最高法院或站在天主教 preschool 一边,对决科罗拉多州项目之争


2026年11月3日 美国东部时间下午2:12 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

华盛顿讯——周二,最高法院似乎很可能站在天主教 preschool 一边,这些 preschool 正在对科罗拉多州拒绝为其免于遵守反歧视要求、不让其参与该州 universal preschool 项目的决定提出质疑。

这场纠纷的核心反歧视规定是《圣玛丽教区诉罗伊案》,该规定要求参与项目的学校为所有儿童提供“平等机会”入学,无论其种族、宗教、性取向、性别认同及其他特征如何。

科罗拉多州准备实施该项目时,负责管理34所天主教 preschool 的丹佛总教区曾申请豁免该反歧视规定,因为这些学校只录取赞同天主教教义的家庭,包括婚姻、家庭和性别认同方面的教义。

但该州拒绝了这一 accommodation 请求,称天主教学校不能“违反州法规对儿童或家庭进行歧视”。

随后,该总教区、其两个教区及一个家庭将该州告上法庭,称其被排除在 universal preschool 项目之外违反了宪法的《自由实施条款》。下级法院支持该州,称反歧视规定中有关性取向和性别认同的条款是中立的,且普遍适用于所有参与 universal preschool 项目的机构。

不过,在周二持续两小时的辩论中,法院的保守派多数法官似乎很可能会作出有利于天主教 preschool 的裁决。此类裁决将延续最高法院近期一系列裁决的方向,该法院拥有6-3的保守派多数席位,此前已多次支持宗教机构,反对其被排除在州福利项目之外,这为更多公共资金流向宗教学校打开了大门。

口头辩论

几位保守派大法官多次提出担忧,认为该反歧视规定实际上是将宗教实体排除在 universal preschool 项目之外的后门手段。

“您同意,科罗拉多州不能说天主教学校、福音派学校或正统犹太学校被排除在universal preschool项目之外,对吗?”艾米·科尼·巴雷特大法官问科罗拉多州副司法部副部长海伦·诺顿。“那请解释,这与您明知这些学校无法同意而强加条件,两者有什么区别?”

巴雷特暗示,反歧视要求的效果是将持有传统信仰的机构“挤出”项目。

“为什么不寻求双赢?”布雷特·卡瓦诺大法官就该州拒绝豁免天主教 preschool 一事问诺顿。他指出,科罗拉多州 universal preschool 项目有超过2000所 preschool 参与,而丹佛总教区管理的只有34所。

“有很多机会尊重宗教信徒的权利,也尊重LGBTQ家长在这2000所学校中为孩子找到合适学校的权利,”他说。

塞缪尔·阿利托大法官提到了科罗拉多州近期在宗教自由案件中败诉的记录,在这些案件中,最高法院曾支持基督教面包师、网站设计师和咨询师。

“在其他第一修正案案件中,我们掌握了该州的记录,”阿利托对诺顿说。“我们该如何看待这一点?”

但科罗拉多州副司法部副部长诺顿表示,科罗拉多州“欢迎”宗教 preschool 加入其项目。

“科罗拉多州唯一的要求是,它们必须符合所有接受公共资金的 preschool 必须满足的相同条件,无论宗教性质还是世俗性质,”她说,并补充称宗教 preschool 可以教授有关性、性别或婚姻的教义,而且“在接受公共资金的同时,完全可以教授这些教义”。

贝基特宗教自由基金会的律师尼古拉斯·里夫斯代表该总教区出庭,他表示,科罗拉多州拒绝给天主教 preschool 提供公共福利,是因为它们的宗教活动。

三位自由派大法官都提出担忧,认为天主教学校正在向该州要求“特殊” accommodation,允许其根据受保护的特征歧视家庭。

埃琳娜·卡根大法官表示,最高法院2022年涉及缅因州学费援助项目的案件确立的原则是,州不能区别对待宗教机构。

“这不是本案的争议原则,”她说。“本案的争议原则是,是否必须对它们更好?”

ketanji·布朗·杰克逊大法官表示,该总教区及其 preschool 正在要求一项“特殊规定”,允许其因学生或其父母的性取向或性别认同而拒绝接收学生。

科罗拉多州的 universal preschool 项目是在2020年该州选民批准一项投票措施后启动的,该措施为新项目提供州资金,旨在为该州所有4岁儿童“广泛提供免费” preschool。

每个家庭每周可获得15小时 preschool 费用的报销,每年报销金额超过6000美元。该州采用混合提供模式,公立、私立、宗教及世俗 preschool 均可参与。参与的机构必须签署合同并符合州质量标准。

设立 universal preschool 项目的法规还规定了反歧视规定。

科罗拉多州估计,全州近2000家 providers 中约有4万名儿童符合 universal preschool 的资格,而该总教区的34所天主教 preschool 并未参与该项目。

Supreme Court seems likely to side with Catholic preschools in fight over Colorado program

November 3, 2026 / 2:12 PM EST / CBS News

Washington — The Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared likely to side with Catholic preschools challenging Colorado’s refusal to exempt them from a nondiscrimination requirement and let them participate in its universal preschool program.

The nondiscrimination mandate at the center of the dispute, St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, requires participating schools to provide children with an “equal opportunity” to enroll regardless of their race, religion, sexual orientation and gender identity, among other characteristics.

When Colorado was preparing to implement the program, the Archdiocese of Denver, which oversees 34 Catholic preschools, sought an exemption from the nondiscrimination rule, since they only enroll families that align with the Catholic Church’s teachings, including on marriage, family and sexual identity.

The state, however, denied the request for an accommodation and said the Catholic schools could not “discriminate against children or families in violation of state statute.”

The Archdiocese, two of its parishes and a family then sued the state, arguing that their exclusion from the universal preschool program violated the Constitution’s Free Exercise Clause. Lower courts sided with the state and said the sexual orientation and gender identity provisions of the nondiscrimination rule are neutral and apply generally to providers participating in the universal preschool program.

But in arguments that spanned two hours on Tuesday, the court’s conservative majority appeared likely to rule in favor of the Catholic preschools. Such a decision would join a line of recent rulings in which the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has sided with religious institutions challenging their exclusion from state benefits programs, opening the door for more public dollars to flow to religious schools.

Oral arguments

Several of the conservative justices repeatedly raised concerns that the nondiscrimination rule was effectively a back-door way to keep religious entities out of the universal preschool program.

“You agree, don’t you, that Colorado could not say that Catholic schools or evangelical schools or Orthodox Jewish schools were excluded from participation in the UPK program?” Justice Amy Coney Barrett asked Helen Norton, Colorado’s deputy solicitor general. “Then explain what the difference is between that and choosing to impose a condition that you know that those schools would be unable to agree to.”

Barrett suggested the effect of the nondiscrimination requirement is to “push out” those with traditional beliefs.

“Why not seek the win-win?” Justice Brett Kavanaugh asked Norton about the state’s refusal to exempt Catholic preschools. He noted that there are more than 2,000 preschools that participate in Colorado’s universal preschool program, and only 34 are overseen by the Archdiocese of Denver.

“There are plenty of opportunities to respect the rights of the religious believers and respect the ability of LGBT parents to find among the 2,000 schools an appropriate fit for their children,” he said.

Justice Samuel Alito raised Colorado’s recent record of losses at the Supreme Court in religious liberty cases, in which the high court sided with a Christian baker, website designer and counselor.

“We have the state’s record” in other First Amendment cases, Alito told Norton. “What should we make of this?”

But Norton, the Colorado deputy solicitor general, said Colorado “welcomes” religious preschools to its program.

“The only thing Colorado asks is that they comply with the same conditions that every publicly funded preschool must meet, religious and secular alike,” she said, adding that religious preschools can teach their beliefs on sex, gender or marriage and are “free to teach them while receiving public funding.”

Nicholas Reaves, a lawyer with the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty who argued on behalf of the Archdiocese, said Colorado is denying Catholic preschools the ability to receive public benefits because of their religious exercise.

The three liberal justices each raised concerns that the Catholic schools were asking for a “special” accommodation from the state that would allow them to discriminate against families based on protected characteristics.

Justice Elena Kagan said that the principle the Supreme Court upheld in a 2022 case involving a Maine tuition-assistance program was that the state cannot treat religious institutions differently.

“That’s not the principle that’s at issue here,” she said. “The principle at issue here is, do you have to treat them better?”

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said the Archdiocese and its preschools are asking for a “special rule” that would allow them to turn away students based on their or their parents’ sexual orientation or gender identity.

Colorado’s universal preschool program launched after voters in the state approved a ballot measure in 2020 to provide state funding for a new program that intended to make preschool “widely available for free” to all 4-year-olds in the state.

Families are reimbursed for the cost of 15 hours of preschool per week, which amounts to more than $6,000 per year. The state uses a mixed-delivery system, meaning public, private, faith-based and secular preschools can participate. Those that do must sign a contract and meet state quality standards.

The statute that created the universal preschool program also imposed a nondiscrimination rule.

Colorado estimates there are roughly 40,000 children who are eligible for universal preschool across nearly 2,000 providers. The Archdiocese’s 34 Catholic preschools do not participate in the program.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2