美国最高法院将审理科罗拉多州普及学前教育项目引发的宗教自由之争


2026-11-02T13:03:32-0500 / CBS新闻

华盛顿讯——美国最高法院将于周二审理一起宗教权利争议,该案核心问题是:科罗拉多州能否以天主教幼儿园拒绝招收不遵守该教会婚姻及性道德教义的家庭的学生为由,将这些幼儿园排除在该州普及学前教育项目之外。

这起名为“圣玛丽堂区诉罗伊案”的案件,是近期关于宗教自由与保护同性恋及跨性别群体免受歧视的最新交锋。

如果天主教原告方胜诉,这项判决将成为美国最高法院近期一系列裁决的延续——目前最高法院以6比3的保守派居多,已数次站在宗教机构一边,支持它们挑战被排除在州政府项目之外的处境,为更多公共资金流向宗教学校打开了大门。

代表该案中天主教幼儿园及家庭的贝克特宗教自由基金会律师阿曼达·迪克在谈及当事人时表示:“科罗拉多州向他们宣传的这个项目是普及性的,该州每个孩子都能从中受益。然而现在已经有多名适龄儿童因宗教义务选择就读天主教幼儿园,却无法享受这项公共福利。他们没法获得该州其他孩子都能享受到的同等待遇。”

科罗拉多州普及学前教育项目

2020年,科罗拉多州选民通过一项投票措施,批准为一项新州府资助项目提供资金,旨在为该州所有4岁儿童提供“广泛可及的免费”学前教育服务。

政府为家庭提供每周15小时学前教育的费用报销,总额每年超过6000美元。该州采用混合供给体系,公立、私立、宗教背景及世俗幼儿园均可参与。参与机构必须签署合同并达到州级质量标准。

创立该普及学前教育项目的法规还规定了反歧视规则,要求参与的幼儿园为符合条件的儿童提供“平等入学机会”,无论其种族、族裔、宗教信仰、性取向、性别认同、收入水平或是否存在残疾。

科罗拉多州估计,全州近2000家幼教机构中,约有4万名儿童有资格参加该普及学前教育项目。

项目推行期间,负责管理34所天主教幼儿园的丹佛总教区对反歧视要求表示担忧,称无法在不违背宗教信仰的前提下合规,特别是涉及性取向和性别认同的规定。

天主教幼教机构申请了针对该规定的宗教豁免,因为它们仅招收符合天主教教义(包括性身份、婚姻及家庭相关内容)的家庭。

但州政府当时拒绝了这一请求,并告知总教区,虽然该机构可以优先招收本教区成员,但不得“违反州法规歧视儿童或家庭”。不过,该学前教育项目的相关规定后来已不再允许宗教背景幼教机构将入学名额限制在本教区成员范围内。

因此,总教区管理的所有幼儿园均未参与该普及学前教育项目。

2023年8月,该总教区、两家设有幼儿园的天主教堂区,以及多名适龄儿童家长提起诉讼,称其被排除在外违反了宪法“自由行使权利条款”。

天主教学校称,该项规定违反了2022年最高法院审理的缅因州学费援助相关案件的裁决。当时最高法院裁定,州政府将宗教学校排除在该项目之外的做法违反了第一修正案。

原告方还指出,州政府在拒绝反歧视规则豁免申请时,对他们采取了区别对待——科罗拉多州曾为世俗行为相关事项提供例外,允许幼教机构优先招收低收入家庭及残疾学生,但却未为宗教相关行为提供同等豁免。

联邦地区法院作出了有利于州政府的裁决,认定反歧视规则中关于性取向和性别认同的条款是中立的,且普遍适用于参与普及学前教育项目的所有机构。美国联邦第十巡回上诉法院维持了下级法院的判决。

最高法院审理的这起争议

在提交给最高法院的文件中,总教区及天主教堂区的律师主张,他们是因宗教信仰的践行而被不公平地排除在普及学前教育项目之外。

迪克表示:“本案的核心问题在于,各州是否能做出诸如承诺推出一项普及性项目,随后却将宗教信仰群体排除在外的行为。”

她指出,天主教家庭“不想仅仅因为选择了天主教教育,就被排除在参与这个普及性项目之外”。

原告方认为,州政府已为其他1000多家幼教机构创造了例外,允许它们为特定社区的4岁儿童提供服务,而这些例外所依据的条款,正是州政府要求天主教学校必须遵守的规定。

总教区称,州政府允许幼儿园优先招收存在特定残疾或贫困儿童,这与“符合条件的儿童应不分收入水平或残疾状况,享有平等学前教育机会”的要求相冲突。

律师还表示,部分幼教机构可以优先招收有色人种儿童或LGBTQ群体家庭的子女。

该案原告、莉莎·希利和丈夫丹尼尔·希利称:“这个项目宣传时号称是普及性的,可到头来,我们却因为信奉天主教、选择为孩子提供天主教教育而遭到歧视。”

这对夫妇的孩子在圣玛丽堂区上学,他们估算自己已从普及学前教育项目中损失了约2.4万美元的报销费用。准备送第三个孩子就读圣玛丽堂区幼儿园的埃丽卡·纳格尔表示,该项目本可为她家节省约1.8万美元。

纳格尔称:“我们因为自己的天主教信仰被迫付出代价,这实在难以接受。这是双重标准——因为你能看到其他学校为服务的社区获得了豁免,可轮到天主教学校为我们服务的社区申请豁免时,却遭到了拒绝。”

天主教堂区认为,科罗拉多州因宗教信仰践行将它们排除在普及学前教育项目之外,其行为应受到最严格的司法审查。它们指出,州政府未能证明将宗教学校排除在项目之外具有紧迫的合法利益。

原告在一份文件中称:“科罗拉多州的这一偏向必然会导致更多该州儿童被导向认同其性与婚姻观念的幼儿园。”

特朗普政府在本案中为天主教原告提供支持。

但为该项目辩护的科罗拉多州官员表示,参与项目的宗教幼儿园可以依据自身信仰开展教学和课程设置,只需遵守适用于其他幼教机构的相同“平等机会”规定即可——该规定要求“所有幼儿园,无论世俗还是宗教背景,都必须在不基于受保护群体身份排斥家庭的前提下提供公共资助的服务”。

州政府指出,天主教幼儿园希望在不遵守反歧视要求的情况下获得公共资金,以便它们可以基于学生或家长的性取向或性别认同拒绝招收学生。

科罗拉多大学法学院教授斯科特·斯金纳-汤普森表示:“当州政府为某件事背书,而承办机构却能说‘不欢迎你们’时,这传递出了某种信号。即使存在次优选择,也仍会对被拒绝、不得不寻找次优选择的人造成深远的负面影响。”

斯金纳-汤普森称,科罗拉多州的法律并未要求参与普及学前教育项目的学校改变教学内容。

“科罗拉多州并没有告诉这些学校应该相信什么、不应该相信什么,应该践行什么、不应该践行什么,”他说,“他们只是说,如果你想开办一家幼儿园并获得这项补贴,请接纳LGBTQ儿童和家庭。”

科罗拉多州官员在提交给最高法院的文件中辩称,总教区和天主教幼儿园要求州政府允许它们以不同于其他所有参与幼儿园的条件获得公共资金,根据这些条件,它们将可以基于受保护群体身份排斥家庭。

州政府指出:“宪法不支持这种结果。”

Supreme Court to hear religious liberty fight over Colorado’s universal preschool program

2026-11-02T13:03:32-0500 / CBS News

Washington — The Supreme Court on Tuesday is set to hear a dispute over religious rights when it weighs whether Colorado can exclude Catholic schools from its universal preschool program over their refusal to enroll students from families that don’t adhere to the church’s teachings on marriage and sex.

The case, known as St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, is the latest clash over religious liberty and efforts to protect gay and transgender people from discrimination.

If the Catholic plaintiffs prevail, the decision would join a line of recent rulings in which the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has sided with religious institutions challenging their exclusion from state programs, opening the door for more public dollars to flow to religious schools.

“This is a program that was sold to them in Colorado as being universal, every child in the state would benefit,” Amanda Dixon, a lawyer with the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which is representing the Catholic preschools and families in the case, said of her clients. “Yet they’ve had multiple children now go through preschool who haven’t been able to benefit because they feel religiously obligated to send their kids to Catholic schools. They can’t get the same benefit that everyone in the state is getting.”

Colorado’s universal preschool program

Colorado voters approved a ballot measure in 2020 to provide state funding for a new program that intended to make preschool “widely available for free” to all 4-year-olds in the state.

Families are reimbursed for the cost of 15 hours of preschool per week, which amounts to more than $6,000 per year. The state uses a mixed-delivery system, meaning public, private, faith-based and secular preschools can participate. Those that do must sign a contract and meet state quality standards.

The statute that created the universal preschool program also imposed a nondiscrimination rule. It requires participating preschools to provide eligible children with an “equal opportunity to enroll,” regardless of race, ethnicity, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, gender identity, income level or disability.

Colorado estimates there are roughly 40,000 children who are eligible for universal preschool across nearly 2,000 providers.

When the program was being implemented, the Archdiocese of Denver, which oversees 34 Catholic preschools, raised concerns about the nondiscrimination requirement and its ability to comply without compromising its religious beliefs, particularly on sexual orientation and gender identity.

The Catholic providers sought a religious exemption to the mandate, since they only admit families that align with the Catholic Church’s teachings, including on sexual identity, marriage and family.

But the state denied the request and told the Archdiocese at the time that while it can give enrollment preference to its members, it cannot “discriminate against children or families in violation of state statute.” The preschool program’s regulations, however, no longer allow faith-based providers to limit enrollment to their congregants.

As a result, none of the preschools that the Archdiocese oversees participate in the universal preschool program.

In August 2023, the Archdiocese, two Catholic parishes with preschools and parents of preschool-age children filed a lawsuit, arguing that their exclusion violated the Constitution’s Free Exercise Clause.

The Catholic schools said that the mandate violated a 2022 Supreme Court decision in a case involving a tuition-assistance program in Maine. In that decision, the high court ruled that the state’s exclusion of religious schools from the program violated the First Amendment.

The plaintiffs also said that the state treated them differently when refusing to grant them exemptions to the nondiscrimination rule, since Colorado had granted exceptions for secular conduct by allowing preschool providers to prioritize enrollment for students from low-income families and with disabilities, but not religious conduct.

A federal district court ruled in favor of the state, finding that the sexual orientation and gender identity provisions of the nondiscrimination rule are neutral and apply generally to providers participating in the universal preschool program. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit upheld the lower court’s decision.

The fight before the Supreme Court

In papers with the Supreme Court, lawyers for the Archdiocese and Catholic parishes argue that they are being unfairly excluded from the universal preschool program because of their religious exercise.

“This case is about whether states can do things like promise a universal program and then leave religious folks out,” Dixon said.

Catholic families, she said, “don’t want to be excluded from the ability to participate in this universal program just because they’ve chosen a Catholic program.”

The plaintiffs argued that the state has allowed more than 1,000 other preschools to serve 4-year-olds in specific communities by creating exceptions from the very provision it is saying the Catholic schools must follow.

The state allows preschools to prioritize enrollment for children with certain disabilities or who are living in poverty, conflicting with the requirement that eligible children have equal access to preschool services regardless of income level or disability, the Archdiocese argued.

Lawyers also said certain preschools can give enrollment preference to children of color or who are from families in the LGBTQ community.

“It was billed as universal, and instead we’re the ones that are being discriminated [against] because we’ve chosen our Catholic faith and a Catholic education for our children,” said Lisa Sheley, who, with her husband Daniel, is a plaintiff in the case.

The couple’s children attend school in St. Mary’s Catholic Parish, and they estimated that they have lost out on roughly $24,000 in reimbursements from the universal preschool program. Erika Nagle, who is preparing to send her third child to St. Mary Catholic Parish’s preschool, said the program would’ve saved her family around $18,000.

“We’re being forced to pay the price because of our Catholic beliefs,” Nagle said. “And it’s just such a tough pill to swallow — it’s a double standard because you see other schools that have been granted exemptions for communities that they serve. But here come the Catholic schools wanting an exemption for the communities that they serve, and they’re being denied.”

The Catholic parishes said that because Colorado excluded them from the universal preschool program because of their religious exercise, its actions should be evaluated under the most stringent form of judicial scrutiny. The state, they said, has failed to show it has a compelling interest in excluding religious schools from the program.

“The inevitable result of Colorado’s thumb on the scale is that more Colorado children will be funneled toward preschools that share Colorado’s perspective on matters of sex and marriage,” they said in a filing.

The Trump administration is backing the Catholic plaintiffs in the case.

But Colorado officials defending the program said religious preschools that participate can teach and develop curricula according to their faith. They just have to comply with the same “equal opportunity” mandate that applies to the other providers, which “requires all preschools — secular and religious alike — to deliver publicly-funded services without excluding families based on protected-class status,” they said.

The Catholic preschools want to receive public funding without following the nondiscrimination requirement, which would allow them to turn away students based on their or their parents’ sexual orientation or gender identity, the state said.

“When the state is putting its stamp on something and then the entity is able to say, ‘You don’t belong,’ that communicates something,” said Scott Skinner-Thompson, a professor at the University of Colorado Law School. “Even if there is a second-best option, it still deeply negatively impacts the people who are turned away and have to go look for that second-best option.”

Skinner-Thompson said nothing in Colorado’s law requires the schools participating in the universal preschool program to change what they teach.

“Colorado isn’t telling any of those schools what to believe or what not to believe, what to practice or what not to practice,” he said. “All they’re saying is, if you want to have a preschool and get this subsidy, please accept LGBTQ kids and families.”

Colorado officials argued in a filing with the Supreme Court that the Archdiocese and Catholic preschools are asking it to allow them to receive public dollars on terms that are different from the ones applied to every other participating preschool. Under those terms, they would be allowed to exclude families based on protected-class status.

“The Constitution,” the state said, “does not support that result.”

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2