官员如何为选举日可能发生的混乱做好准备——包括特朗普带来的威胁


2026-11-02T09:00:15.546Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

选举官员已耗时数月筹备2026年的投票工作,同时也在为可能破坏选举的各类情况做好应对准备。他们正在培训工作人员、加强安保,并准备就可能持续到选举日之后的威胁提起法律诉讼。

“如今我们必须考虑到极为糟糕的最坏情况,无论威胁来自外部势力还是外国势力,”马里科帕县主管托马斯·加尔文表示,“但最重要的是,我们必须做好准备。”

为应对混乱局面做准备是选举运作的一部分。不过,今年各州及地方官员的筹备工作,是在唐纳德·特朗普总统及其盟友加大力度破坏民众对投票诚信的信任、谋求联邦对选举拥有更大控制权的背景下展开的。

“遗憾的是,今年新增了一项此前从未出现过的威胁——我们自己的联邦政府可能会以直接或间接的方式试图干预选举,”民主党籍明尼苏达州州务卿史蒂夫·西蒙在接受CNN采访时表示。

官员们耗时数月琢磨这类干预可能会是什么样子:临时发布行政命令、查扣选票、联邦特工出现在投票站,或企图破坏民众对选举结果的信任。

特朗普及其盟友持续散布非公民大规模投票和选举舞弊的说法,包括针对已在进行的中期选举投票。他们威胁要起诉未能保障投票安全或允许非公民投票的选举官员,并已提起诉讼,试图限制加利福尼亚州有争议选票的计票,以及阿拉斯加州选举结果的认证。

“这类情况频频出现,且大多基于大量虚假信息或半真半假的内容,这实在令人无比沮丧,”科罗拉多县办事员协会执行主任、共和党人马特·克兰表示,“我们会继续全力以赴,确保选举在周二顺利进行,让民众对选举过程充满信心。”

部分选举筹备人员已针对政府在选举日当天或之后采取更极端行动做好准备,比如扰乱投票站、没收选票或选举设备、质疑选举结果,或针对选举管理人员采取行动。

不过到目前为止,特朗普的干预尝试主要在法院展开,以及通过信件要求选举官员搁置部分选票,以便对投票人展开调查——但这类要求已被官员拒绝。全美各地的州已经开始提前线下投票,部分州已开展数周,且尚无联邦政府引发重大混乱的报告。

但官员们仍在为情况可能发生变化做好准备。

上周,特朗普如同对待其他州一样抨击明尼苏达州的选举,在社交平台Truth Social上发文称,共和党候选人落败只可能是“他们在计票时耍了花招作弊”。

“联邦政府将密切关注,”特朗普写道。

对明尼苏达州的官员而言,这番言论恰好验证了他们的担忧和筹备工作——今年他们曾两次参加闭门会议,与其他州的官员一同演练极端情况的应对方案。

“我们这算是打一场假想拳,”西蒙说,“不知道威胁何时、甚至是否会真正来临,只希望永远不会发生。但如果不考虑最坏情况,我们就是愚蠢的。”

其他人则担心联邦干预的最大威胁可能出现在中期选举之后,由对选举结果的质疑和舞弊指控引发。

“政府会说什么来抹黑一切?”克兰表示,“随着这类言论不断升级,人们一直担心,针对选举官员及选举场所的暴力行为会随着虚假信息的增多而加剧。”

各州及地方官员一直在对投票工作人员进行演练,并与当地警方协调,以应对美国移民和海关执法局(ICE)特工或其他联邦特工出现在投票站的情况。

威斯康星州选举委员会建议投票管理人员通知市政办事员、检查徽章或搜查令、记录遭遇情况,并在可能的情况下将特工拒之门外。佐治亚州切罗基县(由共和党籍选举主管领导)在其亲特朗普的州选举委员会要求政府调查该州选举系统后,为投票工作人员新增了类似培训内容。

弗吉尼亚州阿灵顿县提起诉讼,要求武装联邦军官不得进入其投票站。亚利桑那州投票权益组织LUCHA已培训选举观察员留意移民特工的动向。

明尼苏达州官员在今年年初经历了明尼阿波利斯的大规模移民执法行动后,耗时数月向选民保证投票站是安全的,并且如果ICE特工出现,官员们已做好应对准备。

一些地方领导人已演练过更具破坏性的场景:联邦特工抵达并没收选票或投票设备。科罗拉多州博尔德县为选举官员开展了培训,讲解联邦搜查令的样式,并鼓励他们与县检察官办公室共同制定应对策略。该州其他官员则专注于建立严格的保管链记录,以便在选票被没收时准确追踪哪些物品被拿走。

“我认为,这对几乎所有人来说都是全新领域,”博尔德县办事员莫莉·菲茨帕特里克在接受CNN采访时表示,“因此我们提供了相关指南,确保大家始终遵守法律。”

佐治亚州富尔顿县的这种担忧源于今年1月联邦调查局(FBI)对选举枢纽的搜查,当时特工带走了2020年数百箱选票和记录。县委员会主席罗布·皮茨表示,他至今仍不知道这些记录的下落,并正在努力找回。他担心选举日可能会再次出现干预。

“最坏情况:选举日,在计票之前,他们就来没收选票,把选票带走。我们该怎么办?”皮茨在接受CNN采访时表示,“有人说这不可能,但我从这届政府身上学到,不可能的事总会发生。不过我们已做好准备。”

司法部计划向全美50个州派遣1000多名选举监察员,这一计划又开辟了一个新的战场。这些监察员是联邦律师——并非执法人员,其权力范围有限,但选举领导人担心,在特朗普领导下改组后的司法部可能会突破这些限制。

明尼苏达州和怀俄明州等多个州禁止司法部监察员直接进入投票站。怀俄明州共和党领导人指责两名监察员在8月初选期间越权,试图询问选民和工作人员,并检查投票机。

科罗拉多州允许监察员进入,但提出了由州务卿办公室人员陪同等条件。司法部拒绝了该方案,将监察员留在了投票站外。同时,明尼苏达州将派遣州级监察员监督联邦监察员——这实际上是对监察员的监督。

司法部表示,其监察员(在美国选举中长期存在的角色)不会扰乱投票,他们的职责是观察并记录可能出现的问题,以便在选举后展开调查和提出异议。

“令人担忧的是,他们在寻找某种东西,寻找其他选举监察员从未找到过的东西,”密歇根州英厄姆县办事员芭布·拜勒姆在接受CNN采访时表示。

拜勒姆自2013年以来一直担任该职务,今年之前从未在其所在县见过司法部监察员。她表示,在8月初选期间,她对监察员的出现感到怀疑——因为司法部提出的理由包括关于该县投票排长队和投票不当的错误说法——但当时一切进展顺利。

“他们没有发现任何异常情况,”她补充道,“那他们为什么还要再来?我觉得,他们再来的目的是为了进一步质疑我们选举的诚信。”

各州在发生任何冲突前已预先起草了潜在的法律异议。其他州已提前聘请了外部律师。他们已做好准备,一旦联邦干预成为现实,将迅速诉诸法院,寻求立即的救济或禁令。

内华达州州务卿西斯科·阿吉拉尔将筹备工作描述为编写“填词游戏(Mad Libs)”式法律文件——文件中留有姓名和管辖范围的空白,以便律师能够快速应对,特别是如果特工出现在投票站或试图没收投票机或选票时。

“我们已确保预先起草了法律文件,并完成了大量法律研究,随时可以启动,以便在情况发生时迅速做出回应,”阿吉拉尔表示,“两大核心问题是:其一,联邦特工进入投票站;其二,联邦人员进入并没收投票机和选票。”

内华达州已处于联邦的监管之下。国土安全部表示,已确定该州有数千名疑似可能登记投票的非公民——而该州领导人对此数据存在争议。

内华达州官员在近几个月收到了七份大陪审团传票,但因法律限制而拒绝披露细节。阿吉拉尔表示,他已被告知自己正接受司法部调查。

他的团队正在同时处理这些调查要求和选举运作工作。

“主要是要让他们放心,我们会努力保护他们,”他说。

司法部上月向内华达州选举官员发出传票,并起诉该州,称其选民登记册中有约2万名疑似可能的非公民,可能在中期选举中投票。政府希望将这些选票分开,在核实身份合法性之前暂不统计。

科罗拉多县办事员协会共和党领导人克兰表示,他接触过的地方官员在执行选举工作时,“一直在留意”这些传票。

“现在压力更大,因为哪怕一个小失误都可能被放大成一场全国性的虚假信息运动,”克兰在接受CNN采访时表示。

选举官员在选举日前后正走在一条微妙的线上:既要为最坏情况做好准备,又不能让民众对前往投票站感到恐惧。

亚利桑那州州务卿阿德里安·丰特斯反对对联邦行动的担忧,称他认为制造恐惧是政府策略的一部分——且其威胁会受到法律限制。

“这些威胁本身就是在煽动选民恐惧。民众感到担忧,就正中政府下怀,”丰特斯在接受CNN采访时表示,“我不是要对此掉以轻心,但现实是,在事情发生之前,这只是毫无实际行动的威胁。”

其他选举领导人也赞同他的担忧:政府监督中期选举的承诺可能会让选民不愿前往投票站。他们强调,没有证据表明选举日会出现阻止人们投票的混乱情况。

他们的筹备工作只是预防措施——而非让民众远离投票站的理由。

不过丰特斯已耗时数月,确保地方官员理解州对选举的管理权,以及地方执法部门已做好执行联邦监督界限的准备。

他的表态是:任何干扰选民的人都将面临后果,无论对方是活动人士还是联邦特工。

“如果他们违反法律,我们就会起诉,”他说,“就这么简单。”

选举官员还在筹备应对私人公民、活动人士或党派观察员可能对投票站和计票站造成的干扰。

网络上,活动人士已在传播关于选举被操控的旧有说法,以及关于选票和投票机的所谓问题。明尼苏达州起诉了包括詹姆斯·奥基夫在内的两名右翼网红,指控他们在8月初选期间于多个投票站录制视频的行为构成非法投票和身份盗窃等重罪。

官员们担心,这些叙事可能会成为质疑选举结果或破坏公众对选举结果信任的工具。

选举办公室多年来一直在加强防御措施,安装了更多摄像头、防弹玻璃和更严格的准入管控措施。近几周,佐治亚州选举工作人员在处理邮件选票时戴着手套和口罩,此前全国各选举办公室和议员收到了可疑信件。

佐治亚州欧文县的投票工作人员在选举日还将配备另一项设备:恐慌按钮。

How officials are preparing for Election Day disruptions — including from Trump

2026-11-02T09:00:15.546Z / CNN

Election officials have spent months preparing to run the 2026 vote — and bracing for what could disrupt it. They’re training workers, tightening security and readying legal challenges for threats that could stretch well beyond Election Day.

“Lately we have to take into account really horrible, worst-case scenarios, whether that is outside actors or foreign actors,” Maricopa County Supervisor Thomas Galvin said. “But the most important thing is that we have to be prepared.”

Planning for trouble is part of running elections. But this year’s preparations by state and local officials come amid a ramped-up campaign by President Donald Trump and his allies to undermine confidence in voting integrity and assert greater federal control over elections.

“Sadly, a new hazard on the list this time that’s never been on the list before is the possibility that our own federal government would try to interfere somehow, directly or indirectly,” Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon, a Democrat, told CNN.

Officials have spent months considering what that might look like: a last-minute executive order, ballot seizures, federal agents at the polls or efforts to undermine trust in the results.

Trump and his allies continue to allege widespread noncitizen voting and election fraud, including in midterm voting already underway. They have threatened to prosecute election officials who fail to secure the vote or allow noncitizens to cast ballots and have filed lawsuits to restrict the counting of disputed ballots in California and the certification of results in Alaska.

“The more this stuff comes up, and the fact that it is based on so much disinformation or half-truths, it’s incredibly frustrating,” said Matt Crane, the Executive Director of the Colorado County Clerks Association and a Republican. “We’re going to keep working our asses off to make sure the election runs well on Tuesday and that people can have confidence in the process.”

Some election leaders have prepared for the administration to potentially take even more drastic steps on or after Election Day, like disrupting polling places, confiscating ballots or election equipment, challenging the results or going after election administrators.

So far, however, Trump’s attempts to interfere have mostly played out in the courts and with letters demanding that election officials set aside certain ballots so that those who cast them could be investigated — requests administrators have been rebuffing. Early in-person voting has been underway in states across the country — in some states, for weeks — and there have been no reports of major disruptions involving the federal government.

But officials are prepared in case that changes.

Last week, Trump attacked Minnesota’s elections, as he has other states’, writing on Truth Social that a Republican candidate could lose only “if they cheat by playing games with the Ballots as they come in.”

“The Federal Government will be watching closely,” Trump wrote.

For Minnesota leaders, it only validated their concerns and preparations, which included two trips to closed-door conferences this year where they met with officials from other states to game out doomsday scenarios — and how they’d respond.

“We are sort of shadow boxing here,” Simon said. “We don’t know when or if the blow will land, and hopefully it never will. But we would be foolish not to be thinking through worst case scenario.”

Others fear the biggest threat of federal disruption could come after the midterms, fueled by challenges to the results and allegations of fraud.

“What’s the administration going to say to try to put a cloud over everything?” Crane said. “And then as all that rhetoric ratchets up over here, the concern is always that violence against election officials and our facilities increases as that disinformation increases too.”

State and local leaders have been drilling poll workers and coordinating with local police on how to respond if ICE officers or other federal agents show up at voting sites.

Wisconsin’s Elections Commission advised poll leaders to alert municipal clerks, inspect badges or warrants, document encounters and keep agents outside when possible. Cherokee County, Georgia, led by a Republican election director, added similar training for its poll workers after its Trump-aligned State Election Board asked the administration to investigate Georgia’s election systems.

Arlington County, Virginia, sued to keep armed federal officers away from its polling places. In Arizona, the voting-rights group LUCHA has trained election observers to watch for immigration agents.

Minnesota officials have spent months reassuring voters that polling places are safe and officials are ready if ICE shows up, following a major immigration enforcement surge in Minneapolis earlier this year.

Some local leaders have rehearsed an even more disruptive scenario: federal agents arriving to seize ballots or voting equipment. Boulder County, Colorado conducted trainings for election officials on what federal warrants look like and encouraged them to strategize with the county attorney’s office on how to respond. Others in the state focused on airtight chain-of-custody records so they can pinpoint what’s been taken if ballots are seized.

“This is new territory, I think, for just about everybody,” Boulder County Clerk Molly Fitzpatrick told CNN. “So, we’ve provided guidance around making sure that you always follow the law.”

For Fulton County, Georgia, that concern follows the FBI search of an election hub in January, when agents took hundreds of boxes of ballots and records from the 2020 election. County Board Chairman Robb Pitts says he still doesn’t know where the records are and is fighting to recover them. He fears another intervention on Election Day.

“Worst possible scenario: Election Day, before the votes are counted, they come in, confiscate the ballots, take them off. What do we do now?” Pitts told CNN. “People say that’s impossible. Well, what I’ve learned with this administration: the impossible is always possible. We’re prepared, though.”

The Justice Department plans to send more than 1,000 election monitors across all 50 states has opened another front. They’re federal lawyers — not law enforcement — with narrowly defined powers, but election leaders fear a DOJ reshaped under Trump could push past those limits.

Minnesota and Wyoming are among several states barring DOJ monitors from direct access to polling places. Wyoming’s Republican leaders accused two monitors of overstepping during the August primary by seeking to question voters and workers and inspect voting machines.

Colorado offered access with conditions, including an escort from the secretary of state’s office. DOJ declined and will keep its monitors outside. Meanwhile, Minnesota is sending state observers to keep tabs on their federal counterparts — effectively monitoring the monitors.

The administration says its monitors, a longstanding presence in US elections, won’t disrupt voting. Their role is to observe and document potential problems for post-election investigations and challenges.

“What’s concerning is that they are looking for something. Something no other election monitor has ever been able to find,” Ingham County, Michigan Clerk Barb Byrum told CNN.

Byrum has served in her post since 2013 and has never seen DOJ monitors in her county until this year. She said she was suspicious of their presence during the August primary – because the DOJ’s justification included incorrect claims about long lines and improper balloting in her county – but things went smoothly.

“They didn’t see anything out of the ordinary,” she added. “So why are they coming back? Well, they’re coming back, I think, to cast more doubt on the integrity of our elections.”

States have pre-drafted potential legal challenges before any confrontation occurs. Others have preemptively hired outside attorneys. They’re prepared to rush to court and get immediate relief or an injection if federal interference becomes a reality.

Nevada Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar described preparing “Mad Libs” legal filings, leaving names and jurisdictions blank so lawyers can move quickly, especially if agents come to the polls or attempt to confiscate machines or ballots.

“We made sure to have pre-drafted legal finds and a lot of legal research completed and ready to go to be able to respond in moments if something is actually occurring,” Aguilar said. “And the top two major issues was one, federal agents had polling locations, and two, the feds coming in and taking the machines and the ballots.”

Nevada is already under federal scrutiny. The Department of Homeland Security says it identified thousands of possible noncitizens registered to vote there — figures state leaders dispute.

Nevada officials have received seven grand jury subpoenas in recent months, though they declined to discuss details, citing legal constraints. Aguilar says he has been told he is under DOJ investigation.

His staff is juggling those demands with the work of running an election.

“It’s mostly having to reassure them that we will work to protect them,” he said.

DOJ issued subpoenas to California election officials and sued the state last month, alleging that roughly 20,000 possible noncitizens are on its voter rolls and may be voting in the midterms. The administration wants those ballots separated and withheld from the count until citizenship can be verified.

Crane, the Republican head of the Colorado County Clerks Association, said the local officials he works with have those subpoenas “in the back of their minds” as they try to carry out the election.

“There’s more pressure now because you know one little mistake can be amplified into a national disinformation campaign,” Crane told CNN.

Election officials are walking a delicate line heading into Election Day: preparing for the worst without making voters fear the polls.

Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes pushed back on concerns about federal action, saying he thinks fear is part of the administration’s strategy — and its threats run up against legal limits.

“The threats themselves are the voter intimidation. The idea that voters are worried means that the administration is getting what they want,” Fontes told CNN. “I don’t mean to be blithe about it, but the reality is that until something happens, it’s just an empty threat.”

Other election leaders share his concern that the administration’s promises to scrutinize the midterms could keep voters home. They stress that they have no evidence of planned Election Day disruptions that would prevent people from casting ballots.

Their preparations, they say, are a precaution — not a reason to stay away.

Still, Fontes has spent months making sure local officials understand states’ authority over elections and that local law enforcement is prepared to enforce the boundaries of federal oversight.

His message: Anyone who interferes with voters will face consequences, whether an activist or a federal agent.

“If they’re breaking the law, we’re going to prosecute them,” he said. “It’s just that simple.”

Election officials are also preparing in case private citizens, activists or partisan observers disrupt disrupting polling places and ballot-counting sites.

Online, activists are already pushing recycled claims of rigged elections and alleged problems with ballots and voting machines. Minnesota charged two right-wing influencers, including James O’Keefe, with felony counts of unlawful voting and identity theft for a stunt they recorded at several polling places during the August primary.

Officials fear those narratives could become ammunition to challenge results or undermine public trust in the outcome.

Election offices have spent years strengthening their defenses against threats with added cameras, bullet-resistant glass and tighter access controls. In recent weeks, Georgia election workers have handled mail wearing gloves and masks after suspicious letters reached election offices and lawmakers nationwide.

In Irwin County, Georgia, poll workers are getting another piece of equipment for Election Day: panic buttons.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2