新闻


“租客保护”的“有毒组合”摧毁了3900万美元的保障性住房投资,民主党主导城市纷纷效仿

作者:亚历克·谢梅尔 | 福克斯新闻

发布时间:2026年11月1日 凌晨4:00 EST

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/alec-headshot1.1-alec-schemmel-scaled.jpg

【新报道】您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了

西雅图为保护租客所做的努力,据称导致一笔用于建设保障性住房的3900万美元投资化为泡影,这栋为低收入居民提供住所、共254套公寓的建筑已进入破产接管程序。如今,该项目业主在一场诉讼中赢得了法院裁决,这可能会对费城及其他民主党主导城市的类似诉讼产生影响。

华盛顿州上诉法院于周一裁定,负责西雅图第四大道“艾迪生苑”254套保障性住房开发项目的GRE Downtowner有限责任公司,可以继续推进相关主张,该公司认为该市范围广泛的租赁法规构成了对私人财产的违宪征收。GRE声称,这些限制措施包括一项要求房东未经同意必须接纳特定额外租客的法令,导致租金收缴量暴跌,引发了数百万美元的损失,最终使这项原本可行的保障性住房投资在财务上无法持续。

该开发项目曾参与联邦低收入住房税收抵免计划,该计划为私人投资者提供税收优惠,以换取为低收入居民提供受租金管制的公寓。华盛顿州租赁住房协会执行主任肖恩·弗林解释说,这类开发项目通常利润相对微薄,但联邦税收抵免让它们对投资者具有财务吸引力,有助于将私人资金引入保障性住房项目,否则这些项目可能难以启动建设。

弗林正在协助GRE Downtowner公司处理其与西雅图市的诉讼案,他告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,该市针对房东的一系列法令最终形成了一种“立法的有毒组合”,让一个原本正常运转的保障性住房项目被“摧毁”。


【业主倡导组织抨击马姆达尼的“租赁欺诈报告”及公共房东数据库】

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/APARTMENT-COMPLEX.jpg

这是华盛顿州某住房开发项目的照片。(Wolfgang Kaehler/LightRocket via Getty Images)

根据法院文件,GRE的投资最初在财务上是可行的,该物业在2015年至2018年间实现了正现金流。但西雅图随后颁布了一系列法令,限制犯罪背景调查、扩大租客将额外人员带入公寓的权利、限制某些驱逐行为,并要求在符合条件的租金上涨后提供搬迁援助。GRE声称,其租金收缴率从2018年的93.9%暴跌至2023年的44.1%,造成了近580万美元的累计运营损失。

财务状况恶化最终在2026年1月达到顶点,一名联邦法官在该物业拖欠抵押贷款后指定了一名接管人来控制该物业。

“他们通过的政策对他们声称要帮助的人有害,”弗林警告说,他认为对房东的过度限制最终会伤害租客,因为这会抑制住房投资。“如果人们认为政府可以介入并实施征收——将财产从他们手中夺走,而且他们没有任何法律追索权,就没有人会投资建造更多住房。”


【俄勒冈州民主党提议“休息权法案”,在无家可归危机激增的情况下将公共露营合法化】

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/sean-flynn-RHAWA.jpg

肖恩·弗林是驻西雅图的房地产律师,同时担任华盛顿州租赁住房协会(RHAWA)的主席兼执行主任(福克斯新闻数字频道)

“这一裁决表明,政府可以随心所欲地进行监管,”弗林补充道。“但如果监管达到征收我的不动产的程度,我就有权起诉它。”

乔治梅森大学专攻宪法和财产权的法学教授伊利亚·索明告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,这一裁决比常规程序决策更具影响力,但他警告不要夸大其更广泛的影响。

“这只是具有一定重要性,但其重要性不止于仅影响直接相关方的常规法律裁决,”索明说,他解释说,其他州的法院在审理类似的宪法挑战时,可能会参考华盛顿州的这一裁决。他还表示,该案理论上可能会提交至美国最高法院,但可能性相当低。

西雅图并非唯一对房东实施广泛限制的城市。旧金山长期以来一直实施租金管制和驱逐限制,纽约市在2024年根据该州的“合理驱逐法”扩大了驱逐保护,限制房东驱逐特定租客或拒绝续租的权利,同时允许租客对过高的租金上涨提出质疑。俄勒冈州波特兰市限制房东在筛选潜在租客时使用犯罪记录,并要求在特定租金上涨10%或以上后支付搬迁费。费城也通过了涉及犯罪背景调查的限制措施。这些政策反映了民主党主导的主要城市加强租客权利的更广泛趋势,尽管业主们担忧日益严格的住房法规会带来的后果。


【奥巴马时代的政策被削减,因被指责“推高”住房成本】

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/mamdani-housing.jpeg

前克林顿顾问马克·佩恩就佐兰·马姆达尼在纽约市获胜一事向民主党发出警告,称这位社会主义者的政纲“极端”,敦促他们关注议题而非特朗普(Getty Images)

弗林警告说,西雅图住房政策的影响远不止于第四大道“艾迪生苑”项目,他认为日益增多的限制措施已将开发商和小型房东赶出西雅图——这座曾经住宅建设蓬勃发展的城市。

“曾几何时,从我的办公室望出去,能看到一台又一台起重机在建住房,”弗林说。“它们现在都消失了,而且不会再回来了。”

弗林认为,投资的下降最终会伤害普通租客,导致住房选择减少、成本上升。

“当你剥夺提供某种产品的投资动力时,得到的将是更差的产品、更高的价格,”他说。“投资者很敏感,用脚投票。因此住房会减少,且可获得的住房质量也会下降。”


【纽约市租金委员会异议者警告,马姆达尼支持的冻结措施可能长期损害保障性住房:“缓慢的消耗”】

GRE的诉讼依据一种称为“反向征收”的法律原则寻求赔偿,该原则允许财产所有者在认为政府行为实际上征收或损坏了其财产却未提供公正补偿时,寻求赔偿。GRE认为,西雅图的各项法令,无论单独来看还是整体来看,都过度限制了其财产权,该市应对由此产生的损失承担财务责任。

西雅图市检察官办公室告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,官员们正在审查这项上诉裁决,并评估下一步行动。“我们尚未就是否上诉作出决定,”幕僚长安东·诺尔特在周四的一封电子邮件中表示。

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/georgia-homes.jpg

这是2022年11月13日,美国佐治亚州亚特兰大市中心的住宅建筑。(Elijah Nouvelage/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

“我认为此案的原告至少在室友条款上理应胜诉,”索明告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,指的是西雅图对房东将特定额外租客排除在租赁物业之外的能力的限制。

索明提到了最高法院在Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid一案中作出的6比3的裁决,该裁决认定,加州要求农业雇主允许工会组织者进入其私人财产的规定,属于第五修正案下的实际征收。他认为西雅图的《室友法令》引发了类似的宪法问题,因为该法令要求房东接纳他们从未签订租赁合同的额外租客。

“我认为最有力的绝对主张就是针对该法令的这一条款,即他们必须接纳这些他们从未签订任何合同、从未筛选过的人,”索明说。“允许他们进入自己的土地的额外要求,超出了合同约定的范围,同样的情况也适用于西雅图这起案件。”

亚历克·谢梅尔是福克斯新闻数字频道的政治记者,他来自北卡罗来纳州夏洛特,目前居住在华盛顿特区-巴尔的摩大都会区。

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6407612818112

‘Toxic cocktail’ of renter protections destroyed $39M affordable housing investment as Dem cities follow suit

By Alec Schemmel | Fox News

Published November 1, 2026 4:00am EST

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/alec-headshot1.1-alec-schemmel-scaled.jpg

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

Seattle’s effort to protect renters allegedly helped destroy a $39 million investment meant to provide affordable housing, sending a 254-unit apartment complex that served lower-income residents into receivership. Now, its owners have scored a court victory in a battle that could influence similar fights in Philadelphia and other Democrat-led cities.

The Washington Court of Appeals ruled Monday that GRE Downtowner LLC, the company behind Seattle’s 254-unit Addison on Fourth affordable housing development, can proceed with claims that the city’s sweeping rental regulations amounted to an unconstitutional taking of private property. GRE alleges the restrictions, including an ordinance requiring landlords to accommodate certain additional occupants without their consent, sent rent collections plummeting, triggered millions in losses and ultimately made the once-viable affordable housing investment financially unsustainable.

The development operated under the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program, which offers tax incentives to private investors in exchange for providing rent-restricted apartments to lower-income residents. Sean Flynn, executive director of the Rental Housing Association of Washington, explained that while such developments typically generate relatively modest profits, the federal tax credits make them financially attractive to investors, helping bring private money into affordable housing projects that might otherwise struggle to get built.

Flynn, who is working with GRE Downtowner in its case against the City of Seattle, told Fox News Digital that the city’s successive ordinances targeting landlords ultimately created a “toxic cocktail of legislation” that took a functioning affordable housing property and “destroyed it.”

PROPERTY OWNER ADVOCACY GROUPS PUSH BACK ON MAMDANI’S ‘RENTAL RIPOFF REPORT,’ PUBLIC DATABASE OF LANDLORDS

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/APARTMENT-COMPLEX.jpg

A photo of a housing development in the state of Washington.(Wolfgang Kaehler/LightRocket via Getty Images)

According to court filings, GRE’s investment initially proved financially viable, with the property generating positive cash flow from 2015 through 2018. But as Seattle enacted a series of ordinances restricting criminal-background checks, expanding tenants’ ability to bring additional occupants into their apartments, limiting certain evictions and requiring relocation assistance following qualifying rent increases, GRE alleges its rent collections collapsed from 93.9% in 2018 to just 44.1% in 2023, contributing to nearly $5.8 million in cumulative operating losses.

The financial deterioration ultimately culminated in a federal judge appointing a receiver in January 2026 to take control of the property following a mortgage default.

“The policies they’re passing are detrimental to the folks they’re actually trying to help,” Flynn warned, arguing that excessive restrictions on landlords ultimately hurt renters by discouraging housing investment. “No one will invest to build more housing if they believe that the government can come in and effectuate a taking – to take the property out from under them – and they have no legal recourse.”

OREGON DEMOCRATS PROPOSE ‘RIGHT TO REST ACT’ DECRIMINALIZING PUBLIC CAMPING AS HOMELESS CRISIS SURGES

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/sean-flynn-RHAWA.jpg

Sean Flynn is a Seattle-based real estate attorney and the President and Executive Director of the Rental Housing Association of Washington (RHAWA)(Fox News Digital)

“What this decision says is government, you can regulate, you can regulate to your heart’s content,” Flynn added. “But if your regulations amount to the point of which you take my real property, I’m allowed to sue you for it.”

Ilya Somin, a George Mason University law professor specializing in constitutional law and property rights, told Fox News Digital that the ruling is more consequential than a routine procedural decision but cautioned against overstating its broader impact.

“This is only moderately significant, but it’s more significant than just a routine legal decision that only affects the people immediately involved,” Somin said, explaining that courts in other states could consider the Washington ruling when weighing similar constitutional challenges. He also said the case could theoretically go to the U.S. Supreme Court, but said that was fairly unlikely.

Seattle is hardly alone in imposing sweeping restrictions on landlords. San Francisco has long enforced rent controls and limits on evictions, and New York City expanded eviction protections in 2024 under the state’s Good Cause Eviction law, limiting landlords’ ability to remove certain tenants or refuse lease renewals while allowing renters to challenge excessive rent increases. Portland, Oregon, limits landlords’ use of criminal histories when screening prospective tenants and requires relocation payments following certain rent increases of 10% or more. Philadelphia has also adopted restrictions involving criminal-history screening. These policies reflect a broader push to strengthen renters’ rights in major Democrat-led cities, even as property owners raise concerns about the consequences of increasingly restrictive housing regulations.

OBAMA-ERA MANDATE SLASHED AFTER BEING BLAMED FOR ‘SKYROCKETING’ HOUSING COSTS

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/mamdani-housing.jpeg

Former Clinton adviser Mark Penn warns Democrats over Zohran Mamdani’s NYC win, calling the socialist’s platform “extreme” and urging focus on issues, not Trump(Getty Images)

Flynn warned that the consequences of Seattle’s housing policies extend well beyond Addison on Fourth, arguing that mounting restrictions have driven developers and smaller landlords away from Seattle — a city once bustling with residential construction.

“Once upon a time [in Seattle,] you could stand from my office and you could see crane after crane after crane building housing,” Flynn said. “They’re gone, and they’re not coming back.”

Flynn argued that the resulting decline in investment ultimately hurts ordinary renters, leaving them with fewer housing options and higher costs.

“When you take the investment incentive out of providing a product, you get worse products at a higher cost,” he said. “Investors listen and they vote with their feet. And as a result, there’s less housing and the housing that is available is of lesser quality.”

NYC RENT BOARD DISSENTER WARNS MAMDANI-BACKED FREEZE COULD HURT AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVER TIME: ‘SLOW BURN’

GRE’s lawsuit seeks compensation under a legal principle known as inverse condemnation, which allows property owners to pursue payment when they believe government actions have effectively taken or damaged their property without providing just compensation. GRE argues that Seattle’s ordinances, individually and collectively, went so far in restricting its property rights that the city should be held financially responsible for the resulting losses.

The Seattle City Attorney’s Office told Fox News Digital that officials are reviewing the appellate ruling and weighing their next steps. “We haven’t made a decision on an appeal yet,” Chief of Staff Dan Nolte said in an email Thursday.

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/georgia-homes.jpg

Housing in front of the Atlanta skyline in Atlanta, Georgia, US, on Sunday, Nov. 13, 2022.(Elijah Nouvelage/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

“I believe the plaintiffs in this case deserve to win at least on that roommate provision,” Somin told Fox News Digital, referring to Seattle’s restrictions on landlords’ ability to exclude certain additional occupants from rental properties.

Somin pointed to the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid , which ruled that a California regulation requiring agricultural employers to allow union organizers onto their private property constituted a physical taking under the Fifth Amendment. He argued that Seattle’s Roommate Ordinance raises a similar constitutional question because it requires landlords to accommodate additional occupants with whom they never entered into a rental agreement.

“I think the strongest per se argument is simply an argument against this provision of the ordinance, which says they have to take these people who they never made any contract with at all, never screened, and so on,” Somin said. “The additional requirement to let them on their land is going beyond what’s in the contract, and the same thing you know would apply here in the Seattle case.”

Alec Schemmel is a Politics Reporter for Fox News Digital who is originally from Charlotte, North Carolina but now resides in the Washington D.C.-Baltimore Metro Area.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6407612818112

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2