伊尔汉·奥马尔风波为何挥之不去


宪法仅赋予众议院判定议员资格与驱逐议员的权力,总统并无此权限

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/Pergram.jpg 作者:查德·佩格拉姆 福克斯新闻

发布时间:2026年10月31日 美国东部时间下午12:07

新疑云浮现:联邦政府为何终止奥巴马时期对奥马尔婚姻的调查

报道显示,奥巴马政府曾在2016年就众议员伊尔汉·奥马尔的过往婚姻展开调查,其中包括她为帮助哥哥获取移民福利而与其结婚的指控。随着联邦政府重新展开审查,以及调查处理方式引发的诸多疑问,这些指控再度浮出水面。

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/03898492-1460-401a-8051-85b876b262ab

收听本文

7分钟时长

唐纳德·特朗普总统在竞选集会中常有他惯用的炒作话术。

他近期称赞了俄亥俄州共和党籍参议员乔·赫斯特德的身材,仍然频频抨击前总统乔·拜登和副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯。

但近几周来,总统将明尼苏达州民主党众议员伊尔汉·奥马尔列入了高频攻击名单。目前,国土安全部与司法部正就奥马尔涉嫌移民欺诈及财务披露报告问题展开调查。

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

特朗普称伊尔汉·奥马尔可能入狱或被驱逐出境,并称她“是国家的耻辱”

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/ilhan-omar-minneapolis-minnesota.jpg

明尼苏达州民主党众议员伊尔汉·奥马尔周三在新闻发布会上发言,她指责唐纳德·特朗普总统致使她遭到死亡威胁和袭击。(美联社照片/亚当·格雷)

“她所做的就是使用假名,以及其他虚假的东西,”总统对奥马尔愤愤不平。“她用假名宣誓就职。我觉得她应该立即辞去国会议员职务。”

特朗普声称民主党“已经放弃了她的席位”。

但他们没有这么做。

总统还宣称“她将不被法律允许成为那个庄严的政客团体的一员”。

这并不准确。

总统无权决定谁能进入国会。美国宪法第一条第五款将这一权力赋予参议院和众议院,规定两院有权“审查本院议员的选举、选举结果报告和资格”。宪法还规定,两院可“惩罚本院议员之 disorderly行为;经三分之二议员同意,得开除一名议员”。

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/ilhan-omar-field-hearing-minnesota.jpg

明尼苏达州民主党众议员伊尔汉·奥马尔于2026年1月16日出席在明尼苏达州圣保罗市明尼苏达州参议院大楼举行的现场听证会。(吉姆·冯德拉斯卡/盖蒂图片社)

我们提及这些职责,是因为众议院可能需要就奥马尔的“资格”问题展开博弈。尤其是《纽约时报》报道显示,这位明尼苏达州民主党人曾在2016年受到奥巴马时期司法部的审查。此外,该调查显示联邦政府发现她可能存在欺诈婚姻的证据。

如果情况属实,那么奥马尔的公民身份可能会引发质疑,进而导致她是否有资格当选国会议员这一问题。尤其是如果查明她是通过欺诈手段获得公民身份的话。

共和党人已经针对奥马尔多年。而跨党派的民主党人则担心这可能会分散精力、带来麻烦——尤其是在下周中期选举后共和党可能掌控众议院的情况下。

为何将伊尔汉·奥马尔逐出国会比特朗普预期更难的幕后考量

对奥马尔的调查始于2016年她竞选州议员期间,当时贝拉克·奥巴马还是总统。调查持续到拜登政府时期,最终联邦政府在2021年终止了调查。

特朗普政府在10月突袭奥马尔的住所,查获了电子设备和文件后,奥巴马为这位国会议员进行了辩护。

“美国民主的一项基本原则是,政府不得仅仅因为个人的政治信仰或言论就选择性针对他们,”这位前总统表示。“但特朗普政府正是这样对待国会议员伊尔汉·奥马尔的。”

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

奥巴马表示,当前的调查让她的生活“天翻地覆”,并将其定性为“恐吓某人”的行为。

争议性网红兼主播哈桑·皮克在调查期间询问奥马尔本周过得如何。

“这对我来说很正常,”奥马尔回应道。“这是我习惯的情况。”

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/ilhan-omar-walks-past-questions-about-wealth.jpg

明尼苏达州民主党众议员伊尔汉·奥马尔在国会大厦地下室行走交谈的画面。(福克斯新闻数字频道)

奥马尔的一名发言人表示,她“一再坚决否认这一无稽、令人反感的阴谋论”。

但奥马尔十年前曾受到审查的迹象,让外界更难将此次调查视为博客圈传出的右翼无端猜测。

“是谁下令[终止]调查的?”福克斯新闻撰稿人保罗·莫罗问道。“据报道,两届政府都展开了相关案件调查。我们现在知道有多少疑点了。”

奥马尔在2016年竞选州议员时,她的竞选团队发布了一份美国检察官的信件,该信称“并未调查也未要求对奥马尔展开调查”。

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

那么她是否已被证明清白?还是旧调查的消息会火上浇油?

“奥马尔会说,‘他们调查过了,什么也没发现’,”明尼苏达大学政治学教授凯瑟琳·皮尔森表示。“但我认为这也会成为共和党人会利用的一个谈资。所以双方都会试图利用这一点为自己谋利。”

约翰·内格尔是奥马尔下周选举中的共和党对手,他将此次新调查视为政治工具。

“随着她住所被突袭,大家要记住这是一项非常严重的指控,”内格尔表示。“在我看来,索马里在她的生活中是第一位的,而我们对她来说不过是提款机。”

特朗普推动罢免奥马尔将面临最高法院的历史性考验,但法律专家称这是“未知”的曲折

至少有一名共和党人准备将奥马尔逐出众议院。

“如果证据表明她不是美国人,就必须立即将她驱逐,而且可能要入狱,”佛罗里达州共和党众议员兰迪·法恩表示。“我认为,一个外国人可能在国会任职的想法应该让美国人感到恐惧。”

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

但另一位众议院共和党人则敦促谨慎行事。

“我们需要掌握所有事实,”新泽西州共和党众议员克里斯·史密斯表示。“我希望调查是彻底、公正、完全光明正大的。”

还有一个关于正当程序的问题。

“伦理委员会应该启动调查。驱逐现任议员需要众议院三分之二的支持。我非常怀疑民主党人会同意。而且在没有调查结果的情况下肯定不会。”纽约州共和党众议员迈克·劳勒对福克斯新闻表示。“我认为至少,伦理委员会在我们复会后应立即推进调查。”

中期选举后议员返回华盛顿之际,这可能会成为众议院的一个真正的烫手山芋。更不用说明年新一届国会开幕时奥马尔是否能获得席位的问题了。如果民主党赢得众议院,众议院少数党领袖、纽约州民主党众议员哈基姆·杰弗里斯——有可能成为议长——是否会被迫在共和党试图排除奥马尔的情况下解决奥马尔的席位问题?

事实上,在新议长于1月3日宣誓就任整个众议院之前,就会提出这样一项排除动议。议长将为434名议员宣誓就职,随后对有关这名议员的相关问题进行投票。如果民主党赢得众议院,温和派民主党人首次正式就奥马尔席位问题进行全院投票。

对奥马尔投反对票对这些新议员中的一些人可能有利,考虑到他们选区的战场政治属性。但民主党高层会向新议员施压,要求他们在这个棘手问题上与本党团一致投票吗?

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

投票支持奥马尔席位的民主党人会让共和党立即有机会针对代表摇摆选区的新议员提出指控。投票排除或驱逐奥马尔将成为整个两年任期内最重要的投票之一。

我们甚至还未探讨进步派和民主社会主义者——这些新加入众议院的议员——可能会如何猛烈抨击温和派民主党人不支持自己的同僚。这可能会在民主党内部造成严重分裂。

点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

这一风波不会消失。奥马尔是一个极具争议的人物。共和党人相信他们可以继续利用这一话题造势。特朗普总统对奥马尔有他惯用的炒作话术,众议院共和党人可能也会如此。

查德·佩格拉姆目前担任福克斯新闻频道(FNC)首席国会记者。他于2007年9月加入该网络,常驻华盛顿哥伦比亚特区。

Why the Ilhan Omar saga isn’t going away

The Constitution grants only the House the power to judge qualifications and expel members, not the president

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/Pergram.jpg By Chad PergramFox News

Published October 31, 2026 12:07pm EDT

Questions emerge over why feds dropped Obama-era investigation into Omar marriage

Reports indicate the Obama administration investigated allegations surrounding Rep. Ilhan Omar’s past marriage in 2016, including claims that she married her brother to help him obtain immigration benefits. The allegations have resurfaced amid renewed federal scrutiny and questions surrounding the handling of the investigation.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/03898492-1460-401a-8051-85b876b262ab

Listen to this article

7 min

President Donald Trump has his favorite riffs during campaign rallies.

He’s recently complimented the physique of Sen. Jon Husted, R-Ohio. He still calls out former President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.

But in recent weeks, the president spun Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., into heavy rotation on his playlist. The Department of Homeland Security and Justice Department are now probing Omar for alleged immigration fraud and financial disclosure reports.

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

TRUMP SAYS ILHAN OMAR COULD GO TO JAIL OR BE DEPORTED, CALLS HER ‘A DISGRACE TO OUR COUNTRY’

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/ilhan-omar-minneapolis-minnesota.jpg

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., speaks during a press conference on Wednesday, in which she blamed President Donald Trump for death threats and attacks against her.(AP Photo/Adam Gray)

“What she did was use a fake name and other things that are fake,” the president groused about Omar. “She used the fake name to be sworn in. I assume she must immediately resign from Congress.”

Trump argued that Democrats “just conceded her seat.”

They didn’t.

And the president declared that “she will not be legally allowed to be a member of that august body of politicians.”

Not accurate.

The president doesn’t decide who gets to sit in Congress. Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution grants that power to the House and Senate. It charges both bodies with authority to “be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members.” The Constitution goes on to say that the House and Senate may “punish its Members for Disorderly Behavior; and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.”

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/ilhan-omar-field-hearing-minnesota.jpg

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., attends a field hearing at the Minnesota Senate Building on Jan. 16, 2026, in St. Paul, Minn.(Jim Vondruska/Getty Images)

We bring up those responsibilities because it’s possible that the House may need to tangle with the “qualifications” of Omar. Especially since the New York Times reported that the Minnesota Democrat faced scrutiny by the Obama-era Justice Department in 2016. Moreover, that inquiry says the feds found evidence that she may have entered into a fraudulent marriage.

If that’s the case, there could be questions about Omar’s citizenship. And thus, whether she’s even permitted to serve in Congress. Especially if it’s found she was naturalized as a citizen via bogus means.

Republicans have been after Omar for years. Across the aisle, Democrats are concerned this could be a distracting headache. Especially if they seize control of the House after the midterms next week.

THE HITCHHIKER’S GUIDE TO WHY REMOVING ILHAN OMAR FROM CONGRESS COULD BE HARDER THAN TRUMP EXPECTS

The inquiry into Omar began in 2016 when she ran for the state legislature. Former President Barack Obama was in office. The investigation continued into the Biden administration. The feds terminated the inquiry in 2021.

After the Trump administration raided Omar’s home in October — seizing electronics and documents — Obama defended the congresswoman.

“It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say,” the former president said. “But that’s exactly what the Trump administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar.”

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

Obama said the current inquiry flipped her life “upside down” and characterized it as an effort to “intimidate someone.”

Controversial influencer and livestreamer Hasan Piker asked Omar about how her week was going amid the investigation.

“It tracks for me,” replied Omar. “That’s kind of what I’m used to.”

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/ilhan-omar-walks-past-questions-about-wealth.jpg

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., pictured walking and talking in the U.S. Capitol basement.(Fox News Digital)

A spokeswoman for Omar said that she “has repeatedly and unequivocally denied this baseless, disgusting conspiracy theory.”

But indications that Omar faced scrutiny ten years ago make it harder to characterize this as wild, right-wing conjecture emanating from the blogosphere.

“Who ordered [the investigation] closed?” asked Fox contributor Paul Mauro. “Reportedly, both administrations had opened cases into this. We now know how much smoke there is.”

Omar campaigned for the state legislature in 2016. Her campaign released a letter from the U.S. attorney saying it “wasn’t investigating” nor requesting an inquiry into Omar.

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

So was she cleared? Or does word of the old probe pour petrol on the flames?

“Omar will talk about and say, ‘They’ve looked into this. Nothing came about it,’” said University of Minnesota political science professor Kathryn Pearson. “But I think it’s also a talking point that Republicans will use. So I think sort of both sides will try to use that to their advantage.”

John Nagel is Omar’s Republican opponent on the ballot next week. Nagel views the new investigation as a political wedge.

“With the raid on her home, people should keep this in mind. It’s a very serious accusation,” Nagel said. “As far as I’m concerned, Somalia comes first in her life. And we are nothing more than a piggy bank for her.”

TRUMP PUSH TO OUST OMAR FACES HISTORIC SUPREME COURT TEST, BUT LEGAL EXPERTS SEE ‘UNCHARTED’ TWIST

At least one Republican is ready to bounce Omar from the House.

“If the evidence shows that she is not an American, she has to be removed immediately and probably put in prison,” said Rep. Randy Fine, R-Fla. “I think the idea that a foreigner might be actually serving in Congress should be terrifying to Americans.”

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

But another House Republican urges caution.

“We just need all the facts,” said Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J. “I hope that the investigation is thorough, fair, and absolutely aboveboard.”

And then there is the question of due process.

“The Ethics Committee should commence an investigation. It takes two-thirds of the House to expel a sitting Member. I would highly doubt the Democrats would agree. And certainly not without findings,” Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., told Fox. “I think at a minimum, the Ethics Committee should move forward with an investigation immediately upon our return.”

This could develop into a real hornet’s nest for the House when lawmakers descend on Washington after the midterms. That’s to say nothing of questions about seating Omar when the new Congress starts in January. If Democrats win the House, would House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y. — perhaps as speaker — be forced to grapple with the question of seating Omar if Republicans move to exclude her?

In fact, such a motion to exclude comes right before the new speaker swears in the entire House on Jan. 3. The speaker would swear in 434 members. Then takes votes related to the potential member in question. If Democrats win the House, new, moderate House Democrats might take their first formal floor vote on whether to seat Omar.

Voting against Omar might be good for some of these new members, considering the political nature of their battleground districts. But would the Democratic brass pressure new members to vote with the caucus on such a nettlesome issue?

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

Democrats who vote to seat Omar give Republicans an immediate opportunity to build a case against newly-christened members representing swing districts. A vote to exclude or expel Omar would go down as one of the most important roll calls of the entire two-year Congress.

We haven’t even explored how progressives and Democratic Socialists — new to the House — might rage at moderate Democrats for not supporting their colleague. That could produce a serious schism among Democrats.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

This isn’t going away. Omar is a lightning rod. The GOP believes it can continue to milk this. President Trump has his favorite riffs about Omar. And it’s possible that House Republicans may as well.

Chad Pergram currently serves as Chief Congressional Correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC). He joined the network in September 2007 and is based out of Washington, D.C.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2