特朗普针对拜登时代驱逐令的异常法律策略在最高法院奏效


该规则允许移民法官在移民寻求庇护或其他救济的期间推迟驱逐程序

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/robert-schmad.jpg 罗伯特·施马德 福克斯新闻

发布时间:美国东部时间2026年10月28日上午10:19

纽约市避难法维持有效,此前一名联邦法官驳回了司法部的诉讼,此举引发了乔·亚伯拉罕的强烈批评,他的女儿凯蒂在一起肇事逃逸车祸中丧生。与此同时,纽约州长凯西·霍楚尔在州长辩论中回避了关于移民犯罪的问题。

全新内容:您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/55a1d96c-4917-4070-a7f3-97f59e2ba6be

收听本文

2分钟

[](https://beyondwords.io/?utm_source=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com&utm_medium=player&utm_campaign=7893)

最高法院在无人持异议的情况下,批准了得克萨斯州与司法部之间的协议,该协议将终止一项拜登时代的移民规则并使其生效。

拜登政府于2024年通过了该规则,正式确立了移民法官通过所谓“行政关闭”程序临时中止某些驱逐程序的流程,其中包括移民在其他联邦程序中寻求移民救济的情况。最高法院的这一举动维持了下级法院取消该规则的裁决,剥夺了一项允许搁置某些驱逐案件的程序。

得克萨斯州于6月起诉联邦政府,称该规则未经适当法律授权便被通过。

司法部同意得克萨斯州的主张,要求审理此案的法官废除该规则,并防止未来出台类似规则。

为险些成为特朗普刺客的嫌疑人致歉的法官在亨特·拜登FBI案中严厉批评司法部

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/doj_texas_gerrymandering_voting_rights.jpg

得克萨斯州州旗与美国司法部标志并排展示。(盖蒂图片社/司法部)

反对者指责得克萨斯州和司法部合谋废除拜登时代的规则,称尽管双方在诉讼中处于对立立场,但仍存在合作关系。

在司法部提出请求的同一天,由乔治·W·布什总统任命的地区法官里德·奥康纳批准了该请求。

特朗普任命的法官在中期选举前数日接连败诉之际,对司法部关上大门

得克萨斯州州长、共和党人格雷格·阿博特表示,他与唐纳德·特朗普总统的合作关系基于双方对公共安全的共同信念。(谢尔比·陶伯/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社;安德鲁·哈尼克/盖蒂图片社)

然而,在8月,三个拥有大量移民人口的城市——马里兰州巴尔的摩市、康涅狄格州纽黑文市以及俄亥俄州哥伦布市——联合移民法律倡导组织“拉丁裔法律中心”,试图介入此案并在上诉中为拜登时代的规则辩护。

这些城市辩称,废除该规则可能导致居民被驱逐,减少他们的税收收入,并赋予他们对该协议提出质疑的法律资格。但奥康纳驳回了这一论点。

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

曼达尼抨击联邦政府针对纽约市移民发动“暴力与恐怖运动”

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/gettyimages-2224699487-scaled.jpg

唐纳德·特朗普总统、第一夫人梅拉尼亚·特朗普与得克萨斯州州长格雷格·阿博特于2025年7月11日在得克萨斯州克尔维尔的希尔乡村青年活动中心参加圆桌会议。(奇普·索德维拉/盖蒂图片社摄)

10月9日,这三个城市和拉丁裔法律中心要求最高法院在他们上诉期间暂时中止下级法院的判决,指责得克萨斯州和联邦政府为废除拜登时代的规则而进行“恶劣的合谋”。

点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用

联邦律师辩称,这些城市及其盟友缺乏对该协议提出质疑的法律资格,因为他们未能证明联邦法院受理其诉求所需的具体损害。

Trump’s unusual legal gambit against Biden-era deportation rule pays off at Supreme Court

The rule allowed immigration judges to delay deportation proceedings while migrants sought asylum or other relief

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/robert-schmad.jpg By Robert Schmad Fox News

Published October 28, 2026 10:19am EDT

New York City sanctuary laws are upheld after a federal judge dismisses a Department of Justice lawsuit, drawing sharp criticism from Joe Abraham, whose daughter Katie was killed in a hit-and-run crash. Meanwhile, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul deflects questions on migrant crime during a gubernatorial debate.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/55a1d96c-4917-4070-a7f3-97f59e2ba6be

Listen to this article

2 min

[](https://beyondwords.io/?utm_source=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com&utm_medium=player&utm_campaign=7893)

The Supreme Court, with no noted dissents, has allowed an agreement between Texas and the Department of Justice ending a Biden-era immigration rule to go into effect.

The Biden administration adopted the rule in 2024, formally establishing procedures for immigration judges to temporarily pause certain deportation proceedings through a practice known as “administrative closure,” including when migrants were pursuing immigration relief through other federal proceedings. The Supreme Court’s move leaves in place a lower court ruling eliminating that rule, stripping away a procedure that allowed certain deportation cases to be put on hold.

Texas sued the federal government in June, arguing that the rule was adopted without proper legal authority.

The Department of Justice agreed with Texas, asking the judge overseeing the case to vacate the rule and prevent similar rules from being adopted in the future.

JUDGE WHO APOLOGIZED TO ACCUSED WOULD-BE TRUMP ASSASSIN LIGHTS UP DOJ IN HUNTER BIDEN FBI CASE

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/doj_texas_gerrymandering_voting_rights.jpg

The Texas state flag flies alongside the logo from the U.S. Department of Justice.(Getty Images/DOJ)

Opponents accused Texas and the Justice Department of colluding to eliminate the Biden-era rule, arguing that the two sides worked together despite being on opposite sides of the lawsuit.

On the same day the DOJ made its request, District Judge Reed O’Connor, an appointee of President George W. Bush, granted it.

TRUMP-APPOINTED JUDGE SLAMS DOOR ON DOJ AS COURT LOSSES PILE UP DAYS AHEAD OF MIDTERMS’

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, said his working relationship with President Donald Trump is based on their shared belief in public safety.(Shelby Tauber/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

In August, however, three cities with large immigrant populations — Baltimore, Maryland; New Haven, Connecticut; and Columbus, Ohio — joined with Centro Legal de la Raza, an immigrant legal advocacy group, in an effort to intervene in the case and defend the Biden-era rule on appeal.

The cities argued that eliminating the rule could lead to residents being deported, reducing their tax revenues and giving them legal standing to challenge the agreement. O’Connor rejected that argument.

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

MAMDANI BLASTS FEDS FOR WAGING ‘CAMPAIGN OF VIOLENCE AND TERROR’ AGAINST NYC’S IMMIGRANTS

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/gettyimages-2224699487-scaled.jpg

President Donald Trump, first lady Melania Trump and Texas Governor Greg Abbott participate in a roundtable event at the Hill Country Youth Event Center on July 11, 2025, in Kerrville, Texas.(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

On Oct. 9, the three cities and Centro Legal de la Raza asked the Supreme Court to temporarily block the lower court’s judgment while their appeal proceeded, accusing Texas and the federal government of engaging in “egregious collusion” to eliminate the Biden-era rule.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Federal lawyers argued that the cities and their allies lacked legal standing to challenge the agreement because they had not demonstrated the concrete injury required for a federal court to consider their claims.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2