更新于2026年10月27日 美国东部时间下午6:50
发布于2026年10月27日 美国东部时间下午5:41 ET
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/c-gettyimages-2028787474.jpg
视频 广告反馈
美国司法部未能就前白宫助手关于特朗普与1月6日事件的证词对其提起公诉，消息人士称
1分43秒 来源：CNN
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/c-gettyimages-2028787474.jpg
美国司法部未能就前白宫助手关于特朗普与1月6日事件的证词对其提起公诉，消息人士称
1分43秒
唐纳德·特朗普 联邦机构 1月6日事件
Facebook 推文 邮件 链接 Threads
链接已复制！
关注
据两位知情人士透露，美国司法部检察官周二试图但未能通过大陪审团起诉前白宫助手卡西迪·哈钦森，原因是她就唐纳德·特朗普总统在2021年1月6日美国国会大厦骚乱中所扮演的角色作证。
哈钦森是调查该骚乱的众议院特别委员会的关键证人。她在2022年的爆炸性证词中牵连了特朗普，称他知晓当天可能发生暴力事件，但仍选择推进一场演讲，敦促支持者向国会大厦游行。
哈钦森的律师未回应置评请求。
在周二的简短庭审中，一名司法部律师告诉法官，大陪审团作出了“不赞同”的决定，意味着陪审团驳回了司法部寻求的起诉。
检察官没有提及任何被告的名字，但知情人士确认他指的是哈钦森。
这起旷日持久的案件是针对总统 perceived 政治对手的又一次尝试。共和党人和总统的盟友多次表示，他们认为哈钦森应因证词被处以伪证罪，而该证词引发了特朗普的愤怒。
大陪审团驳回指控的情况较为罕见，尤其是因为检察官必须满足的门槛相对较低——即存在犯罪的合理依据。不过，自特朗普上任以来，大陪审团在几起案件中拒绝提起指控，包括针对前联邦调查局局长詹姆斯·科米的单一指控，以及对纽约总检察长莱蒂西娅·詹姆斯和六名敦促军人违抗非法命令的议员的全面起诉。
知情人士告诉CNN，哈钦森可能面临的起诉已成为议员与司法部员工之间争议的焦点。该部门内部有人认为，没有足够的证据提起可行的刑事案件。
相关文章 前白宫助手卡西迪·哈钦森于2023年9月26日在纽约拍摄肖像照。劳拉·奥利维奥/CNN独家报道：共和党议员推动起诉前白宫助手的1月6日证词 阅读时长5分钟
跨党派议员也呼吁该部门放弃调查。路易斯安那州共和党参议员比尔·卡西迪称此事是总统主导的“法律战”行为。
哈钦森是时任白宫办公厅主任马克·梅多斯的前助手，她告诉特别委员会，特朗普在听到当天他的支持者（被看到持有枪支、刀具等武器）在安检处被拦下后勃然大怒。哈钦森称，她听到特朗普说了类似这样的话：“我才不在乎他们有武器。他们不是来伤害我的。把那些该死的弹夹拿走。让我的人进来。”
她还详细描述了她所听到的特朗普试图迫使车队驶向国会大厦的行为——这一说法遭到了当天与总统在一起的其他人的否认。
调查1月6日骚乱的前特别检察官杰克·史密斯今年早些时候在闭门采访中告诉国会议员，哈钦森在调查中并非强有力的证人，部分原因是她的许多陈述来自二手信息。
哈钦森还声称，时任白宫副办公厅主任托尼·奥尔纳托告诉她，当天特朗普在被阻止前往国会大厦后，曾向一名特勤局成员扑去。
奥尔纳托等人否认了这一说法。
本文已更新了新的进展。
唐纳德·特朗普 联邦机构 1月6日事件
Facebook 推文 邮件 链接 Threads
链接已复制！
关注
Justice Department fails to indict former White House aide over her testimony about Trump and Jan. 6, sources say
Updated Oct 27, 2026, 6:50 PM ET
PUBLISHED Oct 27, 2026, 5:41 PM ET
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/c-gettyimages-2028787474.jpg
Video Ad Feedback
DOJ fails to indict former White House aide who testified about Trump and Jan. 6, sources say
1:43 • Source: CNN
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/c-gettyimages-2028787474.jpg
DOJ fails to indict former White House aide who testified about Trump and Jan. 6, sources say
1:43
Donald Trump Federal agencies January 6th
Facebook TweetEmailLink Threads
Link Copied!
Follow
Justice Department prosecutors on Tuesday tried and failed to secure a grand jury indictment of former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson over her testimony about President Donald Trump’s role in the January 6, 2021, US Capitol riot, according to two people familiar with the matter.
Hutchison was a key witness for the special House committee investigating the riot. Her explosive 2022 testimony implicated Trump, saying he was aware of the potential for violence that day, but still chose to move ahead with a speech urging his supporters to march to the Capitol.
Attorneys for Hutchinson didn’t respond to requests for comment.
In a brief court appearance Tuesday, a Justice Department attorney told a judge the grand jury submitted a “non-concurrence,” meaning the panel rejected the indictment the DOJ sought.
The prosecutor did not reference a defendant by name, but sources familiar with the matter confirmed he was referencing Hutchinson.
The long-running case is yet another attempt to target one of the president’s perceived political enemies. Republicans and allies of the president have repeatedly said they believe Hutchinson should be charged with perjury over her testimony, which drew the ire of Trump.
It is rare for grand juries to reject charges, particularly because the threshold prosecutors must meet is relatively low — that there was probable cause a crime was committed. Nevertheless, grand juries have declined to bring charges in several cases since Trump took office, including a single charge against former FBI Director James Comey and full indictments against New York Attorney General Letitia James and six lawmakers who urged service members to disobey illegal orders.
Hutchinson’s potential prosecution became a point of controversy between lawmakers and employees of the Justice Department, sources familiar with the matter have told CNN. Some inside the department believed there was not enough evidence to bring a viable criminal case.
Lawmakers across the aisle have also called on the department to abandon its investigation. Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana called the matter an act of “lawfare” directed by the president.
Hutchinson, a former aide to then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, told the committee that Trump grew angry upon hearing that his supporters — who were seen that day with weapons, including guns and knives — had been stopped at security checkpoints. Hutchinson said she heard Trump say something similar to, “I don’t effing care that they have weapons. They’re not here to hurt me. Take the effing mags away. Let my people in.”
She also detailed what she heard were Trump’s efforts to force his motorcade toward the Capitol — an account that has been disputed by others who were with the president that day.
Former special counsel Jack Smith, who investigated the January 6 attack, told members of Congress in a closed-door interview earlier this year that Hutchinson wasn’t a powerful witness in the investigation, in part because many of her stories were secondhand.
Hutchinson also claimed then-White House deputy chief of staff Tony Ornato told her Trump lunged at a Secret Service member when the president was told he couldn’t go to the Capitol following his speech that day.
Ornato and others have denied this account.
This story has been updated with additional developments.
Donald Trump Federal agencies January 6th
Facebook TweetEmailLink Threads
Link Copied!
Follow
发表回复