2026-10-13T23:27:26-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
作者
2026年10月13日 / 美国东部时间晚上11:27 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
华盛顿讯 — 一名联邦法官周二阻止了特朗普总统封禁CNN、MS NOW和《政治报》进入白宫的企图，无限期保留这三家新闻机构记者进入白宫园区的权限。
由特朗普任命的美国地区法官蒂莫西·凯利批准了这些媒体机构提出的初步禁令申请，该禁令将在案件审理期间持续有效。在一份长达26页的判决书中，凯利认定吊销这些记者的白宫长期通行证很可能侵犯了他们的第五和第一修正案权利。
“特朗普总统吊销原告方长期通行证的行为，很可能会让一名理性的记者或新闻机构不敢发表他所反对的报道，”凯利在判决书中写道，“吊销原告方的长期通行证，对他们能否开展工作、以何种方式开展以及在多大程度上开展工作影响重大。”
特朗普曾预料到他的政府会在CNN、MS NOW和《政治报》提起的诉讼中败诉。他上个月在Truth Social平台上表示，如果凯利判他败诉，司法部将提起上诉。
总统上月宣布，将禁止CNN、MS NOW和《政治报》的记者进入白宫园区，理由是这些媒体“持续‘报道’假新闻”。禁令宣布次日，这三家媒体的记者抵达白宫时被拒之门外，美国特勤局收缴了他们的记者证。
这些新闻机构于9月21日提起诉讼，辩称总统的禁令是对其新闻报道的报复，违反了第一修正案。CNN、MS NOW和《政治报》还辩称，他们的记者被剥夺了第五修正案赋予的正当程序权利，因为他们未收到通知，告知其报道可能导致其白宫访问权限被吊销，也没有机会为自己辩护。
这些媒体提起诉讼的次日，白宫新闻办公室向他们发送了信件，告知总统最初吊销其记者记者证的决定，并设定9月25日作为他们回应的最后期限。白宫辩称，CNN、MS NOW和《政治报》的记者违反了专业标准，发表了引发国家安全担忧的文章。
白宫向这些媒体提供了一份报道清单，称这些报道“威胁国家安全和/或散布虚假信息”。但其中大多数文章的作者并没有白宫长期通行证。根据法庭记录，被标记的《政治报》其中一篇6月发表的报道，基于白宫组织的一次电话记者会撰写。在此次电话会上，记者们被指示将引述内容归因为“一名高级政府官员”。
这些新闻机构请求凯利给予临时救济，恢复其记者进入白宫的权限，法官已于上月晚些时候同意了这一请求。
当时的判决是基于新闻机构提出的正当程序论点。凯利当时并未处理他们的第一修正案主张。
CNN、MS NOW和《政治报》还请求凯利给予更长期的救济，使该命令在整个诉讼过程中持续有效。
在上周的一场听证会上，法官就特朗普政府实施禁令的理由，以及政府在法庭上的论点为何与特朗普的公开辩解不一致，向司法部律师提出了质询。
司法部辩称，总统认定这些媒体应被禁止进入白宫，原因是它们违反了专业标准并威胁国家安全。但特朗普曾多次抨击这些媒体“负面”报道他的政府，并称其“不断发布糟糕的报道”。
凯利表示，特朗普“似乎曾多次公开表示”，他采取行动是“因为X和Y，而现在政府却在法庭上说，实际上是因为Z”。
法官还表示，正当程序方面的担忧是司法部需要克服的“最大障碍”。
在判决书中，凯利表示特朗普政府未能提供证据，证明特朗普最初吊销CNN、MS NOW和《政治报》记者长期通行证的决定是基于国家安全理由。
“他在9月18日的帖子中宣布禁令时，并未提及国家安全。当天晚些时候被问及采取这一行动的‘具体原因’时，他也没有提及国家安全。尽管几天后他在随后有关禁令的社交媒体帖子中使用了‘国家安全’一词，但这一表述似乎只是他用来描述原告在报道其政绩或选举成功等话题时所谓的不准确和不公的另一种方式，”他写道。
多年来，特朗普一直因自己不喜欢的报道抨击媒体，称新闻机构为“假新闻”，并攻击个别记者。此前，因美联社拒绝在其行政令将墨西哥湾更名为“美国湾”后使用该名称，特朗普曾阻止美联社参加白宫的某些活动。
美联提起了诉讼，联邦上诉法院允许特朗普限制其进入椭圆形办公室和空军一号——这些场所只有少数白宫记者团成员能够进入。但上诉法院尚未就白宫针对美联社记者的禁令的法律实质问题作出裁决。
特朗普决定禁止CNN、MS NOW和《政治报》的记者进入整个白宫园区，标志着他与媒体多年来的矛盾升级。他在宣布针对这三家媒体的禁令时警告称，他可能会吊销“其他假新闻媒体”的访问权限。
CNN和哥伦比亚广播公司新闻均属于Skydance，这是派拉蒙与华纳兄弟探索公司合并后成立的母公司。
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-travels-to-alaska-for-rally-amid-tight-senate-race-between-sullivan-and-peltola/
Judge blocks Trump’s White House ban targeting CNN, MS NOW and Politico, saying it likely violated 1st Amendment
2026-10-13T23:27:26-0400 / CBS News
By
October 13, 2026 / 11:27 PM EDT / CBS News
Washington — A federal judge on Tuesday blocked President Trump’s attempt to ban CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House, maintaining access to the grounds for reporters from the three news organizations indefinitely.
U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, who was appointed by Mr. Trump, granted the outlets’ request for a preliminary injunction, which will remain in place while the case moves forward. In a 26-page decision, Kelly found that the revocation of their journalists’ hard passes likely violated their Fifth and First Amendment rights.
“It is likely that President Trump’s revocation of Plaintiffs’ hard passes is the sort of action that would deter a reasonable reporter or news organization from publishing stories to which he objects,” Kelly wrote in his decision. “The revocation of Plaintiffs’ hard passes matters a lot as to how, whether, and to what extent they can do their jobs.”
Mr. Trump had anticipated that his administration would lose in court to CNN, MS NOW and Politico. He said on Truth Social last month that if Kelly ruled against him, the Justice Department would appeal.
The president announced last month his decision to ban journalists from CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House grounds because of what he said was their “constant ‘reporting’ FAKE NEWS.” Reporters from the three outlets who showed up at the White House the day after the ban was announced were turned away and had their press credentials taken by the U.S. Secret Service.
The news organizations filed their lawsuit on Sept. 21 and argued the president’s ban retaliated against them because of their news coverage, in violation of the First Amendment. CNN, MS NOW and Politico also argued their reporters were denied their Fifth Amendment right to due process because they were not provided notice that their reporting could lead to their White House access being revoked or the opportunity to respond.
The day after the outlets filed their suit, the White House Press Office sent them letters informing them of the president’s initial decision to revoke their journalists’ press credentials and setting a Sept. 25 deadline for them to respond. The White House argued that reporters from CNN, MS NOW and Politico violated standards of professionalism and published articles that raised national security concerns.
The White House provided the outlets with lists of pieces that it said “threatened national security and/or spread falsehoods.” But most of the articles were written by journalists who do not have White House hard passes. One of the flagged stories from Politico, which was published in June, was based on a press call organized by the White House. During the call, reporters were instructed to attribute quotes to a “senior administration official,” according to court records.
The news outlets asked Kelly to grant them temporary relief and restore their journalists’ access to the White House, which the judge agreed to do late last month.
His decision then was based on the press organizations’ due process argument. Kelly did not address their First Amendment claims.
CNN, MS NOW and Politico also asked Kelly to grant them longer-term relief, which would remain in place as the litigation plays out.
In a hearing last week, the judge pressed a Justice Department lawyer on the Trump administration’s justifications for the ban and why the government’s argument in court appeared to differ from Mr. Trump’s public justification.
The Justice Department has argued that the president determined the outlets should be denied access to the White House because they violated standards of professionalism and threatened national security. But Mr. Trump has repeatedly attacked the outlets for “negative” coverage of his administration and for publishing “constantly bad stories.”
Mr. Trump “seems to have said publicly and on several occasions” that he was taking action “because of X and Y, and now the government is coming to court saying no, it was actually Z,” Kelly said.
The judge also said the due-process concerns were “the biggest hurdle” for the Justice Department to surmount.
In his decision, Kelly said the Trump administration failed to put forward evidence that Mr. Trump’s decision to revoke hard passes for CNN, MS NOW and Politico journalists initially was based on national security grounds.
“When he announced the ban with his post on September 18, he did not mention national security. When he was asked later that day about the ‘particular reason’ for his action, he did not mention national security. And while it is true, days later, that he used the phrase ‘national security’ in subsequent social media posts about the ban, that expression appears to have been simply another way for him to describe Plaintiffs’ alleged inaccuracies and unfairness in their reporting about topics like his achievements or electoral success,” he wrote.
Mr. Trump has for years denounced the media over coverage that he dislikes, calling news outlets “fake news” and lobbing attacks against individual reporters. The president stopped the Associated Press from attending certain events at the White House over its refusal to use the name “Gulf of America” after his executive order changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico.
The AP sued and a federal appeals court allowed Mr. Trump to restrict its access to the Oval Office and Air Force One, places where only a subset of the White House press corps goes. But the appeals court has not yet ruled on the legal merits of the White House’s ban targeting AP journalists.
Mr. Trump’s decision to keep CNN, MS NOW and Politico journalists from the entire White House campus marked an escalation of his yearslong feud with the press. When he announced the ban targeting the three outlets, the president warned he could revoke access for “other Fake News Media Outlets.”
CNN and CBS News are both part of Skydance, the parent company formed by the merger of Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-travels-to-alaska-for-rally-amid-tight-senate-race-between-sullivan-and-peltola/
发表回复