2026-10-09T10:00:45.519Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/09/politics/house-democrats-midterm-chances
众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯周三宣称,民主党夺回多数席位的道路要穿过“特朗普阵营”,该党正全力争夺两年前总统以两位数优势拿下的选区。
但由于资源有限,党内仍在争论是应稳扎稳打,还是尝试扩大优势。
本周,民主党将6名新候选人加入其认为值得优先争取的翻蓝选区名单,这些选区分布在阿肯色州、科罗拉多州、佛罗里达州、纽约州、内华达州和田纳西州——均为唐纳德·特朗普总统此前拿下的选区,其中两个的胜差超过20个百分点。目前民主党本就面临资金紧张的问题,同时还要在俄亥俄州、俄克拉荷马州和印第安纳州等民主党国会竞选委员会认定的竞争选区发力,因此一些议员和战略人士质疑这份名单是否合适。
一名民主党议员周一致电众议院民主党竞选委员会,要求对方解释其如何筛选重点关注和投入资金的竞选活动。
“我们遇到了很多感到不满的候选人,他们不明白自己为何没能入选。这本质上是因为有限的资源需要在不断扩大的竞选版图中分配,”这名议员告诉CNN。
该议员特别提到,新增名单中没有包含民主党人弗雷德·韦尔曼——他正挑战密苏里州共和党众议员安·瓦格纳,而特朗普在该选区的胜差仅为7.9个百分点,比此次新增的部分选区胜差更小。这名议员表示,党领导团队透露还有大约六名其他处于类似局势的候选人,民主党没有资源为他们提供支持。韦尔曼的竞选团队拒绝置评。
民主党众议员汤姆·苏奥齐正在纽约州第3国会选区寻求连任,在竞选最后四周,他的筹款额仅为对手的三分之一不到。他表示,自己认为民主党可能在拿太多精力去争取翻蓝席位,而忽视了保住现有席位(比如他所在的选区)的重要性。
“如果他们能给我更多资金,我的处境会轻松很多。这是一种冒险策略,但我支持领导层的战略,如果我们能在选举夜全部获胜,那将是一场伟大的胜利,”苏奥齐告诉CNN。
民主党国会竞选委员会(DCCC)执行主任朱莉·默茨在一份声明中表示:“我们正在逐区调整有限的资源,以确保重新当选我们的‘前线议员’,并拿下足够多的席位以赢得多数。”
“一个简单的事实是:全国政治环境对共和党来说持续恶化,而我们在最后几周筹集到的资金越多——我们就能扩大更多处于竞争中的选区数量。”
杰弗里斯表示,该党正专注于夺回众议院多数席位,但他没有详细说明他们可能争取多大的优势,以便更轻松地开展执政工作。
“我们正努力争取拿到218个席位(众议院多数席位门槛),然后在此基础上尽可能多地拿下席位,”杰弗里斯说。他补充道,“我们正全力争取翻蓝的绝大多数席位”都来自特朗普此前以“中低个位数优势”拿下的选区,而现在这些选区的胜差可能达到12至15个百分点。
做出这些决定并不容易。特朗普的支持率暴跌,生活成本和柴油价格飙升,不受欢迎的伊朗战争仍在持续。尽管民主党筹集了高达2.3亿美元的资金,但他们始终不得不应对特朗普阵营4亿美元的竞选资金储备。
就连众议院多数党政治行动委员会(House Majority PAC)也公开承认,扩大竞选版图需要更多资金。
“为了保持我们的势头,我们必须在10月21日的运营截止日期前填补3850万美元的预算缺口,”执行主任艾比·柯兰·霍雷尔在发给捐赠者的一封由CNN获得的邮件中写道。“我们最近宣布扩大战场,向更多有竞争力的选区投入资金。新增的竞选活动需要额外的资源。”
杰弗里斯表示,他认为民主党已经抵消了共和党在今年中期选举中的最大优势之一——选区划分操纵战。“共和党绝不可能在德克萨斯州拿下5个席位,也不可能在佛罗里达州拿下4个席位。实际上,把这两个最大的共和党州加起来,他们可能连一个席位都拿不到,”他说,并指出共和党领导层最初曾预计两州能为他们带来9个席位。
他还表示,特朗普在竞选活动中助阵反而帮了民主党。
“唐纳德·特朗普在全国范围内为共和党候选人助选的次数越多,民主党就越有机会让美国民众相信,我们是唯一决心让民众负担得起生活成本的政党,”杰弗里斯说。
不过,一些幕僚、议员和助手认为,鉴于现有资源有限,民主党不应将版图过度扩张到新选区,而应确保保护好胜算较高的现有席位。
“民主党需要扩大竞选版图,但我们也必须真正专注于哪些竞选活动是可以取胜的,”一名资深民主党竞选助手告诉CNN。“仅仅以微弱差距落败并不会额外加分。我们的目标是组建多数席位、拿下众议院,同时也要拿下参议院。所以,输掉几个特朗普支持率领先16个百分点的选区,却仅以一两个百分点惜败——当然,这算是不错的道义上的胜利,但这无关紧要。我们需要的是胜利。”
在该党令人觊觎的“红转蓝”名单列出的46场竞选中,众议院多数党政治行动委员会已为其中28场提供资金支持,并计划在选举日前至少再投入15场。据广告追踪机构AdImpact的数据,该委员会参与了12场特朗普胜差达到10个百分点或更高的竞选。截至选举日前,他们还预订了7个特朗普胜差至少10个百分点的选区的广告位。
据AdImpact的数据,该委员会已从内布拉斯加州、加利福尼亚州和密歇根州的竞选中撤资,因为他们对在这些选区获胜充满信心。包括迈克尔·布隆伯格的“Everytown”在内的外部组织正在填补全国范围内8场长期以来被民主党列为目标的高关注度竞选,以便众议院多数党政治行动委员会能够将资金转移到其他地方,包括更多竞争激烈且偏红的选区。
据AdImpact的数据,从周五到选举日,众议院多数党政治行动委员会将成为中期选举中最大的广告投放商,总支出将达到1.71亿美元。其共和党对手国会领导基金在同一最后阶段的预订支出约为1.08亿美元。
可以肯定的是,议员们认为,选择稳扎稳打还是扩大优势是一个“幸福的难题”,而且这两种选择并非互斥。
将候选人加入“红转蓝”名单也不代表一定会提供资源,而是向捐赠者发出信号,让他们关注某些特定竞选。最新加入名单的许多选区都属于性价比高的市场,在竞选后期投入少量资金就能比在纽约或德克萨斯州等媒体市场昂贵且拥挤的地区发挥更大作用。
“‘红转蓝’计划全靠自己运作,”一名与“红转蓝”候选人合作的民主党战略家告诉CNN。“一旦获得该资格,你就得靠自己出去筹款,说服捐赠者认为这场竞选值得投入。”
一些民主党团体,比如VoteVets,采取了更有针对性的资金投放策略,专注于“民主党能够获胜的地方,而不是寄希望于‘幸运落败者’”,一名民主党幕僚表示。党内许多人仍对希拉里·克林顿2016年输给特朗普感到耿耿于怀,他们部分归咎于当时民主党试图扩大优势而非专注于真正的摇摆选区。
“我认为问题在于,以我们现有的资源,应该把钱投在哪里?我想每个民主党人都不会忘记2016年的希拉里,”一名民主党战略家告诉CNN。
该党已经看到一些早期迹象,表明扩大竞选版图的策略可能取得成功。
民主党众议员马克·波坎此前一直呼吁DCCC将米切尔·伯曼加入值得争取的翻蓝选区名单,伯曼正挑战威斯康星州众议院行政委员会主席布莱恩·斯泰尔。直到今年9月该党内部民调显示差距缩小,伯曼才终于入选。
当时,党内一些人对此感到惊讶,因为斯泰尔拥有巨大的资金优势。
“两周前我还不看好这场竞选。事实上,如果你当时问我,我会说绝无可能,”一名在2018年“蓝色浪潮”期间为民主党扩大竞选版图工作的民主党幕僚告诉CNN。
从那以后,米切尔的民调差距已经缩小。随后资金开始涌入:据HMP发给CNN的邮件显示,DCCC已投入27.1万美元购买广告位,众议院多数党政治行动委员会也购买了价值88万美元的数字广告。战略人士指出,在斯泰尔这样的选区发起进攻,迫使共和党将原本可以投入其他地方的资源转移过来。
如今这名幕僚的态度已经转变,他告诉CNN:“这只是反映了当前的政治环境。”波坎表示,共和党在筹款上的优势可能不像许多人担心的那样是障碍。
“我认为到11月底或11月中旬,我们真正要讨论的话题将是:金钱可能首次没有像往常一样发挥同等影响力,”波坎告诉CNN。
民主党面临的风险很高。正如过去两年所显示的那样,微弱的多数席位更难凝聚起来通过立法、实现本党的优先政策目标。
“我们在1月3日第120届国会开幕时拥有的多数席位越大,我们执政、真正改善民众生活的能力就越强,”民主党众议员布拉德·施耐德说,他代表众议院温和派民主党人联盟,正努力帮助本党拿下更多席位。“我认为我们不应该支持那些只是努力竞选的候选人,我们只是想让他们知道我们认可他们的努力,但我们知道他们赢不了。我们应该参与那些我们有机会获胜的竞选。”
CNN的大卫·赖特和莎拉·费里斯对本文亦有贡献。
Democrats fear they might be reaching too far in push for huge House margin
2026-10-09T10:00:45.519Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/10/09/politics/house-democrats-midterm-chances
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries declared Wednesday that the path to a Democratic majority goes through Trump country, with his party seriously battling for seats that the president won by double digits two years ago.
But with limited resources, there’s still friction over whether to play it safe, or try to run up the margin.
The tension inside the party came into focus this week when Democrats added six, fresh Democratic candidates to the list of pickup opportunities it felt worth prioritizing from districts in Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, New York, Nevada and Tennessee – all of which President Donald Trump carried, two of them by more than 20 points. In a party already struggling with money– and trying to also win in places like Ohio, Oklahoma and Indiana, where the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has identified districts as in play – some lawmakers and strategists wondered whether the list missed the mark.
One Democratic lawmaker called the party’s House campaign arm on Monday, demanding an explanation on how it is deciding which races to highlight and invest in.
“We are dealing with a lot of upset candidates out there who are wondering why they didn’t make the cut. And it’s just a function of limited resources that have to be spread around an ever-expanding map,” the lawmaker told CNN.
That lawmaker raised in particular why the list of pickups didn’t include Democrat Fred Wellman, who is running to unseat GOP Rep. Ann Wagner in Missouri in a district Trump won by 7.9 points. That is a smaller margin than some of the other races added to the list. The lawmaker said party leaders shared there were about a half dozen other candidates in similar races that the party doesn’t have the resources to support. Wellman’s campaign declined to comment.
Democratic Rep. Tom Suozzi, who is running in New York’s 3rd Congressional District and is being outspent more than two-to-one during the final four weeks of his tough re-election bid, said he feels the party might be gambling by focusing too much on pickups, rather than holding on to seats like his.
“My life would be a lot easier if they gave me more money. It’s a risky strategy. But I support the leadership and their strategy and if we all win on Election Night, it’s going to be a great victory,” Suozzi told CNN.
DCCC Executive Director Julie Merz said in a statement, “We have calibrated our limited resources district-by-district to ensure we re-elect our Frontliners and flip enough seats to win the majority.”
“The simple truth is: the national environment continues to deteriorate for Republicans and the more we raise in these final weeks – the more we can expand the number of districts in play.”
Jeffries said the party is focused on taking back the majority – but he did not detail what margin they might try to create to help them govern more comfortably.
“We’re working hard to get to 218, and then to win as many seats as we can on top of it,” Jeffries said. He added that the “overwhelming majority of seats that we’re working hard to flip” in Trump-won seats are ones he carried from the “mid-to-low single digits into ones that he may have won by 12-15 points.”
The decisions are not easy. Trump’s popularity is plummeting, the cost of living and diesel prices are skyrocketing, and the unpopular Iran war rages on. But despite an eye-popping $230 million fundraising haul, Democrats have consistently had to contend with Trump’s $400 million war chest.
Even the House Majority PAC, the House Democrats’ political action committee, has publicly acknowledged that expanding the map requires more money.
“To maintain our momentum, we must close our $38.5 million budget gap by the October 21 operational deadline,” Executive Director Abby Curran Horrell said in an email to donors shared with CNN. “We recently announced that we’re expanding the battlefield and investing in additional competitive districts. Additional programming requires additional resources.”
Jeffries said he believed that Democrats had neutralized one of the GOP’s biggest advantages in this year’s midterms — the gerrymandering war. “Under no circumstances are Republicans winning five seats in Texas or four seats in Florida. In fact, they may not get the five when you combine the two biggest Republican states together,” he said, noting that GOP leaders had initially believed they’d win nine seats between the two states.
And he said Trump on the campaign trail was helping.
“The more Donald Trump campaigns for Republicans across the country, the better the opportunity for Democrats to further convince the American people that we are the only ones determined to make life affordable for them,” Jeffries said.
Some operatives, lawmakers and aides, though, argue that the party should not try to expand the map too far into new districts with the limited resources available, but rather make sure the safer seats are protected.
“Democrats need to expand the map, but we also need to be really focused on what are the winnable races,” a longtime Democratic campaign aide told CNN. “You don’t get extra points for only losing by one point. This is about building a majority and flipping the House and flipping the Senate. So, losing a couple states or a couple districts that were Trump + 16 and only losing them by one or two. I mean yeah, that’s a nice moral victory, but this shit matters. We need to win.”
Of the 46 races listed on the party’s coveted “Red to Blue” list, House Majority PAC has put money behind 28 of them and is scheduled to spend in at least 15 more between now and Election Day. There are 12 races the group is involved in where Trump won by 10 points or more, according to AdImpact. Between now and Election Day, they’ve made reservations in seven more districts that Trump carried by at least 10 points, according to AdImpact.
In races in Nebraska, California and Michigan, the group has taken money out, according to AdImpact, because they feel so confident about their chances there. Outside organizations like Michael Bloomberg’s group, Everytown, are filling in 8 high-profile races across the country that have long been on Democrats’ target list so the House Majority PAC can move its money elsewhere, including in more competitive and red-leaning areas.
From Friday through Election Day, the House Majority PAC is set to be the largest advertiser in the midterms, spending a total of $171 million, according to AdImpact. The Republican counterpart, Congressional Leadership Fund, has about $108 million booked over the same final stretch.
To be sure, lawmakers argue, deciding whether to play it safe or try to run up the score is a good problem to have, and the options are not mutually exclusive.
Adding members to the “Red to Blue” list is also not a promise of resources, but rather a signal to donors to pay attention to certain races. And many of the latest additions are in cost effective markets where a small investment late in the game can go a lot further than in places like New York or Texas, where the media market is expensive and crowded.
“Red to Blue is what you make of it,” a Democratic strategist who works with ‘Red to Blue’ candidates told CNN. “It’s kind of on you once you get that designation to go out and fundraise off of it and convince donors that it’s worthwhile.”
Some Democratic groups, like VoteVets, have taken a more targeted approach on where they put their money, focusing on “where Democrats can win, and not betting on the lucky loser,” according to a Democratic operative. Many in the party are still haunted by Hillary Clinton’s 2016 loss to Trump, which they blame in part on a desire to run up the score rather than win true battlegrounds.
“I think the question is, with the resources that we have, where do we put them? I always think about Hillary 2016 as something that no Democrat has forgotten,” a Democratic strategist told CNN.
The party has seen some early indications it can be successful in targeting an expanded map.
Democratic Rep. Mark Pocan had been advocating for the DCCC to add Mitchell Berman, the Democrat trying to unseat House Administration Committee Chair Bryan Steil in Wisconsin, to the list of races it felt worthy of trying to flip, but it wasn’t until the party’s own polling saw the gap closing in September that it finally happened.
At the time, some in the party were surprised given Steil’s outsized cash advantage.
“I was not a believer of this race two weeks ago. And in fact, if you called me and asked me about it, I would have been like no way in hell,” a Democratic operative, who worked on expanding the map for Democrats during the 2018 blue wave, told CNN.
Since then, Mitchell has closed the polling gap. Then the money started coming in: the DCCC has made a $271,000 ad buy, and House Majority PAC has bought $880,000 worth of digital ads, according to the HMP email shared with CNN. Strategists point out that going on offense in districts like Steil’s forced Republicans to then divert resources they could have spent elsewhere.
Now that operative is singing a different tune, telling CNN, “it’s just indicative of the environment.” And Pocan said the GOP’s fundraising advantage might not be the obstacle many feared.
“I think the real story we’re going to be talking about at the end of November or mid-November is going to be the story that money didn’t have, for maybe the first time, the same influence it normally does,” Pocan told CNN.
The stakes for Democrats are high. As the last two years have demonstrated, a narrow majority is harder to keep together to pass legislation and achieve your party’s priorities.
“The bigger majority we have going into January 3rd and the 120th Congress, the more ability we will have to govern, to actually make a difference in people’s lives,” said Democratic Rep. Brad Schneider, who represents a coalition of moderate Democrats in the House and is trying to help the party flip more seats. “I don’t think we should be backing candidates because they’re working really hard, and we just want them to know we love them for their effort, but we don’t think they’re going to win. We should be playing in races where we have a shot at winning.”
CNN’s David Wright and Sarah Ferris contributed to this report.
发表回复