2026-09-30T17:00:29.242Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)
美国总监察长对美联储总部翻新项目的审查发现,时任主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔在管理这项耗资巨大的工程时,没有迹象表明其违反法律或存在不当行为,但报告尖锐批评了鲍威尔和美联储理事会,称其任由项目预算飙升至20亿美元以上。
周三公布的调查结果驳斥了唐纳德·特朗普总统及其盟友的指控——他们称鲍威尔在翻新项目监管中存在刑事过失,特朗普借此作为持续数月施压鲍威尔辞职的手段之一。
“我们未发现合理依据认定存在联邦刑事违法行为,也未发现违反美联储理事会政策、足以构成行政不当行为的情形,”美联储总监察长在这份长达120页的翻新项目报告中写道。
总监察长的调查历时一年,结果显示该翻新项目的总成本较2020年的初始预估几乎翻了一番,目前美联储为该项目编制的预算约为24亿美元。
今年5月上任的美联储主席凯文·沃什在写给总监察长的单独信函中认可了审查结果,同时承诺对项目承包商开展独立审计。美联储发言人除沃什信函内容外拒绝置评。
特朗普因鲍威尔拒绝降息而对其不满,尽管他2017年提名鲍威尔出任这一职位。去年春季,特朗普在一系列攻击时任主席鲍威尔的言论中着重提及了项目超支问题。他曾亲自前往美联储总部视察翻新工程,彻底公开了两人之间的紧张关系。在那次视察期间,鲍威尔甚至当着镜头实时纠正了特朗普的成本估算。
此次批评引发了国会审查,并促使司法部对鲍威尔启动短暂的刑事调查,后因部分共和党议员的强烈反对而暂停。
尽管总监察长的报告驳回了针对鲍威尔的最严重指控,但它指责美联储理事会在多个环节管理不善,得出结论称其“本可以更好地控制成本,缓解部分显著的建筑成本上涨”。
审查发现,项目从一开始就存在问题:理事会未设定价格上限,也未确保投标建筑公司提交完成全部翻新工程的成本估算。
总监察长在报告中写道,美联储理事会也未对项目的日常进展进行足够密切的监控,甚至曾为“推进项目”而拒绝就项目部分内容寻求更具竞争力的投标。
“我们还担忧,如此规模的项目没有正式确立的成功衡量标准来监控其进展,”报告称,并最终得出结论:“理事会未采取诸多可行措施,本可以更好地控制成本,缓解部分显著的建筑成本上涨。”
不过,报告发现,翻新项目中一个备受审视的方面并未导致成本超支:特朗普和国会共和党人所指责的、被视为美联储铺张浪费证据的饮水机、大理石修复及其他装饰性工程。
“这些初始设计方案包含某些曾被国会议员和其他外部利益相关者突出质疑的设计特征,”报告称,“我们未发现这些设计特征对建筑成本的大幅上涨造成实质性影响。”
报告未将项目缺陷归咎于鲍威尔或任何美联储理事会理事,称该流程主要由美联储内部一系列委员会负责管理。
但总监察长建议美联储理事会采取七项整改措施,包括启动项目审计,并在现有合同中搜寻可追回的成本。
沃什在信函中同意落实所有这些建议,指出“以最高效和透明的方式完成工程”的必要性。
他还透露,自己已要求美国总务管理局审查该项目并协助监督翻新工程收尾——此举非同寻常,实际上让联邦机构介入了独立央行的相关事务。
特朗普本人因白宫及华盛顿各地的一系列翻新工程成本问题持续面临审查。最引人注目的是,他正在监督的白宫宴会厅项目已远超最初2亿美元的预算,而政府几乎未说明如何承担额外成本。
这份报告似乎为特朗普长期以来试图影响美联储及其决策的行动画上了或许最引人注目的一笔,其中包括针对鲍威尔以及试图罢免美联储理事会理事丽莎·库克。白宫发言人卡什·德赛在一份声明中未就总监察长未认定存在犯罪行为一事发表评论,但称报告“强化了特朗普总统多次指出的、美联储此前领导层存在的严重管理不善问题”。
“尽管多次向国会和管理与预算办公室保证,项目将得到认真监管,但此前的美联储领导层未能重视或关注成本控制执行,导致美联储的翻新工程成本翻倍,给美国纳税人造成负担,”他补充道。
特朗普也经常在公开场合敦促美联储大幅降息,打破了此前各总统不愿干预央行独立性的惯例。这一情况在沃什5月上任后仍在持续,尽管美联储随后已上调利率。特朗普虽对此决定表示不满,但迄今未直接针对沃什。
鲍威尔于今年5月任期届满时卸任美联储主席一职,但以罕见方式继续留在美联储权力核心的理事会。鲍威尔解释此举是因为“一系列针对美联储的法律攻击威胁到我们在制定货币政策时不受政治因素干扰的能力”。
“我原本早就计划退休,”鲍威尔在4月底对记者表示,“过去三个月发生的事情让我别无选择,只能留任,直到这些问题得到彻底、透明且最终的解决。”鲍威尔补充道,在调查“圆满结束并得到透明处理”之前,他不会离开美联储理事会。
哥伦比亚特区美国检察官珍妮妮·皮尔罗于4月终止了对鲍威尔的特别刑事调查。不过皮尔罗表示,其办公室将审查总监察长的报告,并指出如有必要,可能重启刑事调查。
本文已补充报道内容并更新。
Powell did not break the law with expensive Fed renovations that incensed Trump, report finds
2026-09-30T17:00:29.242Z / CNN
An inspector general review of the Federal Reserve’s headquarters renovation found no sign that then-Chair Jerome Powell broke the law or committed misconduct in his management of the costly project, even as it sharply criticized him and the central bank’s board for allowing the price tag to balloon beyond $2 billion.
The conclusions released Wednesday undercut President Donald Trump and his allies’ accusations that Powell had been criminally negligent in his oversight of the renovations — a charge that Trump seized on as part of a monthslong bid to pressure Powell to resign.
“We did not find reasonable grounds to believe that a violation of federal criminal law had occurred and did not identify violations of Board policy warranting an administrative misconduct finding,” the Fed’s inspector general wrote in the 120-page report on the renovations.
The report follows a yearlong investigation into a renovation project that has seen its total cost nearly double from initial estimates in 2020, the inspector general found, with the Fed now budgeting roughly $2.4 billion for the project.
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, who took over the top post in May, concurred with the review’s findings in a separate letter to the inspector general. He also committed to conducting an independent audit of the project’s contractor. A Federal Reserve spokespesron declined to comment beyond the contents of Warsh’s letter.
Trump, who had soured on Powell over his refusal to lower interest rates despite nominating him to the position in 2017, had highlighted the cost overruns in a series of attacks on the then-chair last spring. At one point, he personally visited the Fed headquarters to inspect the renovations, putting the tensions between the two men on full display. During that visit, Powell even fact-checked Trump’s cost estimates in real time before the cameras.
The criticism prompted congressional scrutiny and spurred the Justice Department to briefly open a criminal probe into Powell, before suspending it amid intense backlash from some Republican lawmakers.
Yet while the inspector general report dismissed the most serious accusations levied against Powell, it faulted the Fed’s board for mismanaging the renovations project at several points, concluding that it “could have better controlled costs and mitigated some of the significant construction cost increases.”
The project was troubled from the beginning, the review found, with the board failing to set price caps or ensure that firms bidding on the construction submitted estimates for how much it would cost them to complete the total renovation.
The Fed board also did not monitor the project’s day-to-day developments closely enough, the inspector general wrote, and at one point decided against seeking more competitive bids for elements of the project in order to “keep the project moving.”
“We also found it concerning that a project of this magnitude had no formally established success measures to monitor the project’s progress,” the report said, later concluding that “the Board did not take numerous actions available to it that could have better controlled costs and mitigated some of the significant construction cost increases.”
However, one heavily scrutinized aspect of the renovations did not drive the cost overruns, the report found: The water fountains, marble restoration and other flourishes that Trump and congressional Republicans had highlighted as evidence of the Fed’s largess.
“These initial design plans included certain design features that have been highlighted and questioned by members of Congress and other external stakeholders,” the report said. “We did not find that these design features materially contributed to the substantial construction cost increases.”
The report did not blame Powell or any individual Fed board governors for the shortcomings, describing a process that was instead managed largely by a web of committees inside the central bank.
But the inspector general recommended that the Fed’s board take seven corrective actions, including launching an audit of the project and a search within its existing contracts for costs that might be recouped.
Warsh in his letter agreed to implement all of those recommendations, pointing to the necessity “of completing the work in the most efficient and transparent way possible.”
He also disclosed that he had already asked the Government Services Administration to examine the project and help oversee the completion of the renovations — a notable step that effectively involves a federal agency in the activities of the independent central bank.
The president has faced ongoing scrutiny over the price tags of his own set of renovation projects at the White House and across Washington. Most notably, he’s overseeing the construction of a White House ballroom that has already far exceeded its initial $200 million estimate, with the administration offering little clarity on how it’s covering those additional costs.
The report appears to close perhaps the most striking chapter in Trump’s long-running efforts to influence the Federal Reserve and its decision-making, which included targeting Powell and separate attempts to remove Fed board member Lisa Cook. In a statement, White House spokesman Kush Desai did not weigh in on the inspector general’s not finding a crime, but said the report “reinforces the gross mismanagement that President Trump has repeatedly highlighted by the Federal Reserve’s prior leadership.”
“Despite numerous assurances to Congress and OMB that the project was being carefully overseen, prior Fed leadership failed to be attentive or concerned about cost control enforcement while costs of the Fed’s renovation doubled for American taxpayers,” he added.
Trump has also frequently pressed the Fed in public to slash interest rates, breaking with previous presidents’ reluctance to meddle with the central bank’s independence. That has continued since Warsh took over in May, even as the Fed has since moved to raise interest rates. While Trump expressed frustration with the decision, he has so far declined to personally target Warsh.
Powell stepped down as Fed chair in May when his term expired but took the rare step of remaining on the central bank’s powerful board of governors. Powell explained his decision by citing “the series of legal attacks on the Fed which threaten our ability to conduct monetary policy without considering political factors.”
“I had long planned to be retiring,” Powell told reporters in late April. “The things that have happened really in the last three months have, I think, left me no choice but to stay until I see them through.” Powell added that he would not leave the Fed board until the investigation was “well and truly over with transparency and finality.”
Jeanine Pirro, the US attorney for the District of Columbia, dropped an extraordinary criminal investigation into Powell in April. However, Pirro said her office would review the inspector general report and indicated the criminal probe could be restarted, if warranted.
This story has been updated with additional reporting.
发表回复