2026-09-25T09:01:07-04:00 / 福克斯新闻网
最高法院大法官凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊警告：紧急案卷或沦为“绕过标准审查程序的捷径”
作者：格雷格·诺曼-戴蒙德 福克斯新闻网
发布时间：2026年9月25日 美国东部时间上午9:01
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6405099523112
司法部长托德·布兰奇为特朗普对最高法院邮寄选票裁决的批评辩护
司法部长托德·布兰奇为唐纳德·特朗普总统批评最高法院的权利辩护，相关风险进一步上升。在一项引发争议的邮寄选票裁决出台后，布兰奇辩称，总统完全有权批评政府其他部门。他强调，不同意法院裁决是美国民主运作过程中的自然一环。
NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了！
最高法院大法官凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊严厉抨击同事们加速审理最高法院紧急案卷，称“本院明显变得不再克制，尤其是在涉及争议性议题的待决案件方面”。
紧急案卷有时也被称为“影子案卷”或“临时案卷”，允许当事人请求最高法院迅速介入诉讼，暂时暂停下级法院的裁决。这一程序可能只需数天、数周或数月，相较于法院全面审理案件实质问题的方式，被视为一种更快的救济途径——尽管只是临时救济——后者通常需要漫长的案情陈述和口头辩论环节。
“为何当如此多其他当事人正排队耐心等待法院审理时，却有一方能获得直达美国最高法院的快速通道？”杰克逊周四在哥伦比亚特区大学法学院的演讲中说道，据《国会山报》报道。
“如果我们不小心行事，紧急案卷可能而且将会沦为绕过标准审查程序的捷径，成为某些特权诉讼当事人可以选择性使用的特殊渠道，”她补充道。
最高法院拒绝介入拒绝堕胎的代孕母亲案
最高法院大法官们于2022年10月7日在最高法院拍摄合影。就座从左至右依次为：索尼娅·索托马约尔大法官、克拉伦斯·托马斯大法官、美国首席大法官约翰·G·罗伯茨 Jr.、塞缪尔·A·阿利托 Jr.大法官和埃琳娜·卡根大法官。站在身后从左至右依次为：艾米·科尼·巴雷特大法官、尼尔·M·戈萨奇大法官、布雷特·M·卡瓦诺大法官和凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊大法官。（《今日美国》报业集团通过路透社连线供稿）
据《国会山报》报道，杰克逊发表此番演讲之际，特朗普政府自总统第二任期开始以来已向最高法院提交了40份紧急申请。
通过紧急案卷程序，最高法院批准了特朗普大规模解雇职业雇员以及高调解雇民主党任命官员的举措。它还限制了全国性禁制令的适用，并为引发争议的驱逐和移民拦截行动扫清了道路。
据Politico报道，自特朗普第二任期开始以来，其政府在紧急案卷上诉案中的胜诉率约为80%。
卡瓦诺在中期选举前最高法院败诉的情况下为特朗普在邮寄选票规则案中“提供救命稻草”
2026年3月9日，最高法院大法官凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊在华盛顿特区美国法院的 ceremonial 法庭进行联合授课。（《华盛顿邮报》通过盖蒂图片社供稿）
最高法院的多数派判决经常在意识形态上出现分歧，且很少解释其紧急裁决的理由。这与法院的最终判决不同，后者通常篇幅较长，包含大量协同意见和不同意见。
据《法院新闻社》报道，杰克逊周四还表示，对于那些无法等待下级法院作出完整判决的案件，当事人应当证明存在迫在眉睫的损害，而非由最高法院基于下级法院可能犯错的理由批准暂缓执行申请。
2026年9月12日，美国总统唐纳德·特朗普在爱尔兰都柏林离开阿拉斯安乌恰兰宫时，独自沿着爬满常春藤的墙壁驻足停留。（阿尔图尔·维达克/阿纳多卢通讯社通过盖蒂图片社供稿）
点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP
“最高法院的暂缓执行裁决可能造成重大的现实世界损害，而当本院的裁决未承认这一现实时，它们显得麻木不仁且空洞无力，”杰克逊在报道中被引述道。“如果我们 consistently 在没有明确解释的情况下，持续批准那些对诉讼原告造成实际损害的行为，却未经过法院基于案情全面且公正地裁定该受质疑行为的合法性，那么我们就不能指望公众对我们的司法系统抱有信心。”
福克斯新闻数字频道的阿什利·奥利弗为本报道撰稿。
格雷格·诺曼是福克斯新闻数字频道的记者。
Liberal justice hammers Supreme Court for fast-tracking emergency docket cases
2026-09-25T09:01:07-04:00 / Fox News
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warns emergency docket could become ‘end run around the standard review process’
By Greg Norman-Diamond Fox News
Published September 25, 2026 9:01am EDT
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6405099523112
AG Todd Blanche defends Trump’s criticism of Supreme Court mail ballot ruling
Stakes rise as Attorney General Todd Blanche defends President Donald Trump’s right to criticize the Supreme Court. Following a controversial mail-in voting ruling, Blanche argues that the president is absolutely allowed to be critical of other branches of government. He emphasizes that disagreeing with court decisions is a natural part of how American democracy works.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ripped her colleagues for fast-tracking cases on the high court’s emergency docket, saying “it has been noticeably less restrained, especially with respect to pending cases that involve controversial matters.”
The emergency docket, sometimes known as the shadow or interim docket, allows parties to ask the Supreme Court to quickly intervene in lawsuits and temporarily pause lower court rulings. The process can take a couple of days, weeks or months, and is viewed as a much speedier, although temporary, way to secure court relief than when the court fully considers the merits of a case, which can include a long briefing schedule and oral arguments.
“Why is it that one party should get a fast pass to the Supreme Court of the United States, when so many other parties are queued up, waiting patiently for the court’s attention?” Jackson said Thursday during a speech at the University of the District of Columbia’s law school, according to The Hill.
“If we’re not careful, the emergency docket can and will become an end run around the standard review process, a special avenue that certain privileged litigants can use selectively,” she added.
SUPREME COURT DECLINES TO INTERVENE IN CASE OF SURROGATE MOTHER WHO REFUSED ABORTION
Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photo at the Supreme Court on Oct. 7, 2022. Seated from left: Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice of the United States John G. Roberts Jr., Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. and Associate Justice Elena Kagan. Standing behind from left: Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh and Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.(USA TODAY Network via Reuters Connect)
Jackson’s speech comes as the Trump administration has submitted 40 emergency applications to the Supreme Court since the start of the president’s second term, The Hill reported.
Through the emergency docket, the Supreme Court has greenlit Trump’s mass firings of career employees and high-profile terminations of Democratic appointees. It has curtailed nationwide injunctions and cleared the way for controversial deportations and immigration stops.
Since the start of Trump’s second term, his administration has won about 80% of its appeals on the emergency docket, according to Politico.
KAVANAUGH THROWS TRUMP ‘A LIFELINE’ ON MAIL BALLOT RULES DESPITE SUPREME COURT LOSS BEFORE MIDTERMS
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson gives a joint lecture in the Ceremonial Courtroom at the U.S. Courthouse in Washington, D.C., on March 9, 2026.(The Washington Post via Getty Images)
The Supreme Court’s majority has often split along ideological lines and offered little reason for its emergency decisions. This differs from final orders from the court, which can be lengthy and include numerous concurring opinions and dissents.
Jackson also said Thursday that parties should be required to prove impending harm in cases that cannot wait for full adjudication by the lower courts, as opposed to the Supreme Court granting stay applications based on whether lower courts could have made mistakes, Courthouse News Service reported.
U.S. President Donald Trump pauses as he walks alone along an ivy-covered wall during his final departure from Aras an Uachtarain on Sept. 12, 2026, in Dublin, Ireland.(Artur Widak/Anadolu via Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“Significant real-world harms can follow Supreme Court stay rulings, and when the court’s orders do not acknowledge that reality, they seem oblivious and ring hollow,” Jackson was quoted as saying. “We cannot expect the public to have faith in our judicial system if, without clear explanation, we are consistently greenlighting harmful acts that do real damage to litigating plaintiffs without a court decision fully and fairly determining the lawfulness of that challenged conduct on the merits.”
Fox News Digital’s Ashley Oliver contributed to this report.
Greg Norman is a reporter at Fox News Digital.
发表回复