最高法院恢复国土安全部公民身份数据工具用于选民审计,为特朗普阵营带来重大胜利


2026-09-25T15:53:35.985Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

作者:蒂尔尼·斯尼德

发布时间:2026年9月25日,美国东部时间上午11:53

8月25日拍摄的美国最高法院外观

J. 斯科特·阿普怀特/美联社

在为唐纳德·特朗普总统寻找非公民选民的行动中取得重大胜利之际,美国最高法院于周五裁定,各州可以使用一项颇具争议的公民身份数据收集工具来审查选民登记名单。

最高法院这份未具名的判决书驳回了相关辩称,即拜登政府此前为方便官员利用该数据系统核查选民公民身份的做法涉嫌违法。

不过判决书同时强调,在选举临近之际,该程序只能用于对选民公民身份进行“个性化”核查,并暗示联邦法律禁止在选举日临近时开展大规模选民清除行动。

三名自由派大法官对该裁决提出了异议。

此次裁定推翻了此前叫停这项被称为“合格外国人系统化核查”(简称SAVE)程序的判决。美国地区法官斯帕克·苏克南南此前曾认定,拜登政府为将该数据程序用于对各州选民登记名单进行全面审查而对其进行改造的做法,违反了联邦隐私法。

多数大法官在判决书中指出,根据联邦法律,“联邦政府有义务回应州和地方选举官员提出的核实选民公民身份的请求”。最高法院表示,下级法院的禁令“阻碍了联邦政府使用其认为最适合这项任务的程序”。

本文为突发新闻,将持续更新。

Supreme Court revives DHS citizenship data tool for voter audits in win for Trump

2026-09-25T15:53:35.985Z / CNN

By Tierney Sneed

PUBLISHED Sep 25, 2026, 11:53 AM ET

The Supreme Court is seen on August 25.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

In a major win for President Donald Trump’s efforts to find non-citizen voters, the Supreme Court on Friday said states can use a controversial citizenship data collection tool for reviewing voter rolls.

The court’s unsigned opinion rejected arguments that the administration likely broke the law by making easier for officials to use the data system to vet voters’ citizenship status.

But the opinion emphasized the use the program for “individualized” checks of a voter’s citizenship as the election approaches, while suggesting federal law prohibits mass purges close to Election Day.

The three liberal justices dissented from the ruling.

The order reverses a ruling that had blocked the use of the program known as Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements or SAVE. US District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan had previously concluded that the administration violated federal privacy law in how it overhauled the data program so it could be used for sweeping reviews of state voter rolls.

Under federal law, the majority wrote, “the federal government has an obligation to respond to requests from state and local election officials seeking to verify the citizenship of voters.” The lower court order, the Supreme Court said, “prevents the federal government from using the program it believes is best suited to the task.”

This story is breaking and will be updated.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2