2026-09-24T13:20:57.03Z / 路透社
记者：内特·雷蒙德与凯瑟琳·杰克逊
2026年9月24日 美国东部时间下午1:20 更新于1小时前
美国司法部长托德·布兰奇2026年9月15日于华盛顿白宫玫瑰园举行新闻发布会。路透社/乔纳森·恩斯特
- 摘要
- 司法部长托德·布兰奇宣布计划提起上诉
- 最高法院曾两次在这类遣返问题上支持特朗普
- 该政策是特朗普移民打击行动的一部分
波士顿9月24日（路透社）——美国司法部长托德·布兰奇周四表示，唐纳德·特朗普政府将请求美国最高法院允许其继续快速将移民遣送至非本国的第三国，且不给予他们就目的地提出任何安全顾虑的机会。
布兰奇作出上述宣布之际，移民权益律师于周三晚间获得联邦上诉法院的一项命令，该命令生效了一项裁定，认定美国国土安全部针对所谓第三国的遣返政策非法。
《虚假信息监测》简报汇总国际虚假信息叙事，每期都包含“真实还是虚假？”测试题。点击此处注册。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
总部位于波士顿的美国第一巡回上诉法院应移民权益律师的要求发布了该命令。这些律师在得知政府计划于周四开展第三国遣返航班、将移民送往三个非洲国家后，请求法院介入。
布兰奇在社交媒体帖子中表示，第一巡回法院的命令“阻止我们开展所有针对非法外国人的第三国遣返，而这是遏制非法移民浪潮的完全合法且极为宝贵的工具”。
外界此前便预计政府会提起上诉。在同一案件中，最高法院曾两次解除保护移民正当程序权利的法官初步禁令，随后应政府请求批准将八名男子遣返回南苏丹。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
作为特朗普移民打击行动的一部分，国土安全部于2025年3月出台了一项政策，允许在美国移民当局获得可靠外交保证、即移民不会遭受迫害或酷刑的情况下，将移民送往此类国家。
但该政策还规定，在将移民送往未向国务院作出此类保证的第三国之前，仅需提供最低限度的通知。
该政策遭到了可能受其影响的移民提起的集体诉讼挑战。美国地区法官布莱恩·墨菲——民主党前总统乔·拜登的任命官员——于2月搁置了该政策。
第一巡回法院于周五基本维持了墨菲的裁决，认为移民法要求移民获得有意义的机会，就如果被遣返至这些国家可能面临的迫害或酷刑问题提出任何顾虑。
但据挑战该政策的原告律师称，国土安全部坚称周五的裁决尚未生效，并计划于周四从弗吉尼亚州起飞一架航班，将移民送往布隆迪、卢旺达和中非共和国。
政府的立场依据是，第一巡回法院于3月发布了一项暂停墨菲裁决的命令。第一巡回法院于周三晚间应原告请求解除了该3月命令。
“该命令明确表明，任何航班或巴士都不应开展第三国遣返行动，”代表原告的全国移民诉讼联盟律师特里娜·雷almuto说道。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
补充了关于上诉的更多细节以及原告律师的评论
凯瑟琳·杰克逊报道；多伊纳·恰库与威尔·邓汉姆编辑
我们的准则：汤森路透信托原则
US to seek Supreme Court relief after court blocks third-country removals
2026-09-24T13:20:57.03Z / Reuters
By Nate Raymond and Katharine Jackson
September 24, 2026 1:20 PM UTC Updated 1 hour ago
U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche holds a press conference in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 15, 2026. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
- Summary
- Attorney General Todd Blanche announces planned appeal
- Supreme Court twice has backed Trump on these deportations
- Policy is part of Trump’s immigration crackdown
BOSTON, Sept 24 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump’s administration will ask the US Supreme Court to allow it to continue to swiftly deport migrants to countries other than their own without offering them the chance to raise any safety concerns about their destination, US Attorney General Todd Blanche said on Thursday.
Blanche made the announcement after immigrant rights lawyers secured an order from a federal appeals court on Wednesday night that put into effect a ruling deeming the US Department of Homeland Security’s policy on deportations to so-called third countries unlawful.
The Misinformation Monitor newsletter rounds up international misinformation narratives, with a “Real or Fake?” quiz in every edition. Sign up here.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
The Boston-based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals issued that order at the request of immigrant rights lawyers, who asked it to intervene after they learned that the administration had planned a third-countries deportation flight scheduled for Thursday that would send migrants to three African nations.
Blanche in a social media post said the 1st Circuit’s order “blocked us from conducting all third-country removals of illegal aliens, an entirely legal and invaluable tool to stem the tide of illegal immigration.”
An appeal had been expected. Earlier in the same case, the Supreme Court twice lifted a judge’s preliminary injunction protecting migrants’ due process rights and later cleared the way for eight men to be deported to South Sudan, at the administration’s request.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
As part of Trump’s immigration crackdown, DHS adopted a policy in March 2025 allowing migrants to be sent to such countries if US immigration authorities receive credible diplomatic assurances the migrants will not be persecuted or tortured.
But the policy also called for only minimal notice before a migrant could be sent to a third country that had not given the State Department such assurances.
The policy was challenged in a class action lawsuit by migrants who could be subject to it. US District Judge Brian Murphy, an appointee of Democratic former President Joe Biden, set aside the policy in February.
The 1st Circuit largely upheld Murphy’s ruling on Friday, holding that immigration law requires migrants be given a meaningful chance to raise any concerns that they might have about facing persecution or torture if they are deported to those countries.
Yet DHS took the position that Friday’s ruling was not yet in effect and was planning a flight out of Virginia on Thursday that would take migrants to Burundi, Rwanda and the Central African Republic, according to lawyers for the plaintiffs challenging the policy.
The administration based its position on the fact that the 1st Circuit in March issued an order pausing Murphy’s ruling. The 1st Circuit dissolved that March order late on Wednesday at the request of the plaintiffs.
“The order makes crystal clear no flights or buses should carry out third-country removals,” said Trina Realmuto, a lawyer for the plaintiffs at the National Immigration Litigation Alliance.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Adds further details throughout on appeal, comment from plaintiff lawyer
Reporting by Katharine Jackson; Editing by Doina Chiacu and Will Dunham
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
发表回复