2026-09-24T01:29:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司（CBS）新闻
作者：雅各布·罗森
杰克·罗森是负责报道美国司法部的记者。此前他曾作为竞选数字记者跟踪报道特朗普总统2024年竞选活动，还曾担任《与玛格丽特·布伦南会面》节目的助理制片人。
查看完整简历
更新时间：2026年9月24日 / 美国东部时间凌晨1:44 / 哥伦比亚广播公司（CBS）新闻
华盛顿讯 一名联邦法官于周四凌晨暂时阻止特朗普政府高级官员禁止CNN、MS NOW和《政客》杂志进入白宫，并表示应立即恢复三家媒体记者的采访证件。
美国地区法官蒂莫西·凯利批准了三家新闻机构提出的临时救济请求，恢复它们进入白宫园区的资格，以便它们就特朗普总统因报道内容而将它们禁止进入白宫建筑群的举措提起诉讼。
CNN、MS NOW和《政客》的律师辩称，这项限制违反了第一修正案以及记者应享有的正当程序权利。
在一份长达八页的裁决书中，凯利表示，三家新闻机构很有可能证明禁令缺乏正当程序。他写道，相关记者未事先收到禁令通知，也没有机会对禁令提出异议。他还指出，白宫作为禁令理由所援引的CNN、MS NOW和《政客》的部分报道“属于常规报道”，在某些情况下甚至是数月前的旧闻。
凯利还表示，他对特朗普政府所称禁令出于国家安全顾虑的说法“持怀疑态度”。
“在本案起诉前的所有记录中，没有任何迹象表明吊销原告的终身采访证是出于国家安全考量，”这位在特朗普第一任期内获得提名的法官说道，“显然，特朗普总统在宣布‘禁止’原告进入白宫时也并非这么说的——相反，他重点指责原告的报道所谓缺乏真实性和充满负面性。”
在考虑下达更长期的救济措施期间，凯利下达的临时限制令将持续14天。
美国司法部预计将迅速对该裁决提起上诉。特朗普本周早些时候在Truth Social平台上表示，如果凯利做出有利于新闻机构的裁决，其政府将向上诉法院提起诉讼。
特朗普于周五宣布，“即刻起”禁止CNN、MS NOW和《政客》进入白宫，理由是它们“持续‘报道’假新闻”。周六上午，试图进入白宫园区的三家媒体记者被拒之门外，特勤局还收缴了他们的采访证件。
三家新闻机构于周一提起诉讼，对特朗普的禁令提出质疑。记者们的律师表示，该禁令属于对其报道行为的违宪报复，违反了宪法正当程序条款，因为记者们未收到通知，知晓总统会因不喜欢相关报道而拒绝他们进入白宫，也没有机会对该决定作出回应。
“总统的表态明确表明，他实施这项禁令是为了迫使CNN、MS NOW和《政客》对本届政府进行更正面的报道，并威慑其他记者和新闻机构不要报道总统可能视为负面的内容，”三家媒体的律师在诉状中写道。
哥伦比亚广播公司（CBS）新闻和其他数十家新闻机构提交了一份法庭之友意见书，支持这三家媒体，辩称特朗普政府的禁令理由“明显带有基于观点的歧视性”。
美国司法部为总统的禁令进行了辩护，在一份文件中称新闻机构的报道引发了国家安全方面的担忧。他们还表示，这三家媒体的记者未能做到“专业和得体”。
“进入白宫是一项特权，而非一项权利，”政府律师在诉状中写道。
他们辩称，白宫有权“出于令人信服的理由”限制记者进入白宫，包括执行“新闻从业者应遵守的最低专业标准”以及保护机密信息。
美国司法部还披露，白宫新闻办公室已于周二致信每家新闻机构，通知他们总统决定吊销其记者的终身采访证。
信中称，这些新闻机构“表现出违反了获准进入白宫建筑群者应遵守的专业和得体标准的行为，包括传播关于国家安全和其他问题的可证实的虚假信息，以及发布敏感或机密信息”。
白宫给CNN、MS NOW和《政客》下达了周五下午5点的截止期限，要求它们就相关指控作出回应。
这些信件似乎旨在回应新闻机构提出的禁令剥夺了它们正当程序权利的主张。
特朗普的禁令不仅立即影响了各家媒体进入白宫园区的能力，还波及了CNN在白宫电视新闻池中的成员资格——该新闻池还包括其他四家媒体：CBS新闻、ABC新闻、NBC新闻和福克斯新闻。
作为新闻池的一员，CNN本应于周一随特朗普前往纽约参加联合国大会，但因禁令被取消了随行资格。为此，其他四家电视台一同暂停了电视新闻池的运作，以示对CNN的支持。
这个五家电视台组成的电视新闻池负责拍摄总统的相关画面，随后分发给其他新闻池成员及其合作台和订阅用户。只有这些电视台搭建并维护了从白宫或随总统出行时向合作台传输画面的实体基础设施。
在周三下午的听证会上，凯利似乎对特朗普政府的禁令持怀疑态度。法官援引了两项上诉法院判例，这些判例确立了一项先例：当白宫试图吊销记者的采访资格时，第五修正案规定的正当程序权利适用。
“我认为可以公平地说”，这两起判例中规定的程序“在本案中并未得到遵守”，凯利在周三的听证会上说道。
Judge blocks Trump’s ban on CNN, MS NOW and Politico, restoring White House access for now
2026-09-24T01:29:00-0400 / CBS News
By Jacob Rosen
Jake Rosen is a reporter covering the Department of Justice. He was previously a campaign digital reporter covering President Trump’s 2024 campaign and also served as an associate producer for “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.”
Read Full Bio
Updated on: September 24, 2026 / 1:44 AM EDT / CBS News
Washington — A federal judge early Thursday morning temporarily blocked senior Trump administration officials from barring CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House and said their journalists’ press credentials must be immediately restored.
U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly granted a request from the three news outlets for temporary relief that reinstates their access to the White House grounds while they challenge President Trump’s move to ban them from the complex because of their coverage of his administration.
Lawyers for CNN, MS NOW and Politico have argued that the restriction violates the First Amendment and their right to due process.
In an eight-page ruling, Kelly said the three news outlets are likely to succeed in showing the bans lacked due process, writing that the journalists were not given prior notice of the bans or an opportunity to challenge them. And he noted that some of the CNN, MS NOW and Politico stories that the White House cited as justification for the bans were “routine” and, in certain cases, months old.
Kelly also said he is “skeptical” of the Trump administration’s claim that the bans were motivated by national security concerns.
“[Nothing] in the record that predates this suit suggests that the revocation of Plaintiffs’ hard passes was motivated by national security concerns,” said the judge, who was nominated by Mr. Trump during his first term. “Certainly, that is not what President Trump said when he announced that he was ‘banning’ Plaintiffs from the White House—instead, he focused on the alleged lack of truthfulness and negativity of Plaintiffs’ reporting.”
Kelly’s temporary restraining order will remain in place for 14 days while he weighs granting longer-lasting relief.
The Justice Department is expected to swiftly appeal the decision. Mr. Trump said on Truth Social earlier this week his administration would turn to the appeals court if Kelly ruled in favor of the news outlets.
Mr. Trump announced Friday that “effectively immediately,” he was banning CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House because of their “constant ‘reporting’ FAKE NEWS.” On Saturday morning, reporters from the three outlets who attempted to enter the White House complex were turned away and had their press credentials taken by the Secret Service.
The news organizations filed a lawsuit challenging Mr. Trump’s ban on Monday. Lawyers for the journalists said the ban amounted to unconstitutional retaliation for their coverage of the president and violated the Constitution’s Due Process Clause because their reporters did not receive notice that the president would deny them access because of reporting he dislikes or an opportunity to respond to the decision.
“The President’s statements make clear he implemented the ban to coerce more favorable coverage of the administration from CNN, MS NOW, and POLITICO, and to deter other journalists and news organizations from reporting that the President might view as unfavorable,” lawyers for the outlets wrote.
CBS News and dozens of other news organizations submitted a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the three outlets, arguing that the Trump administration’s reasons for banning them are “are transparently viewpoint discriminatory.”
The Justice Department has defended the president’s ban, arguing in a filing that the news organizations’ reporting raises national security concerns. They also said journalists for the three outlets failed to act with “professionalism and decorum.”
“Access to the White House is a privilege, not a right,” government lawyers wrote in a filing.
They argued that the White House has “compelling reasons” for restricting the reporters’ access to the White House, including enforcing “minimum standards” of professionalism for the press and protecting classified information.
The Justice Department also revealed that the White House Press Office sent letters to each of the news organizations Tuesday notifying them that the president decided to revoke their journalists’ hard passes.
The letters claim that the news outlets have “exhibited behavior in violation of the standards of professionalism and decorum expected of those given access to the White House Complex, including by trafficking in verifiable falsehoods about national security and other issues, and publishing sensitive or classified information.”
The White House gave CNN, MS NOW and Politico a deadline of 5 p.m. Friday to respond to its claims.
The letters appear designed to address the news outlets’ claims that the ban deprived them of due process.
Mr. Trump’s ban had an immediate impact not only on each outlets’ ability to access the White House grounds, but also CNN’s participation in the White House television pool, which also includes four other outlets: CBS News, ABC News, NBC News and Fox News.
CNN was supposed to travel with Mr. Trump to New York on Monday for the United Nations General Assembly as part of the press pool, but was removed from the trip because of the ban. As a result, the four other networks suspended the television pool altogether in support of CNN.
The five-network television pool captures footage of the president that is then distributed to the other members of the TV pool and their affiliates and subscribers. Only those networks have set up and maintained the physical infrastructure to transmit to affiliates footage from the White House and when traveling with the president.
During a Wednesday afternoon hearing, Kelly appeared skeptical of the Trump administration’s ban. The judge pointed to two appellate court cases that established the precedent that the Fifth Amendment’s right to due process applies when the White House tries to revoke a journalist’s access.
“I think it is fair to say” that the process laid out in those two cases “wasn’t followed here,” Kelly said in Wednesday’s hearing.
发表回复