密苏里州国会选区地图之争第三次提交美国最高法院


2026-09-23T08:14:44.244Z / 路透社

作者:安德鲁·钟
2026年9月23日 格林尼治标准时间上午8:14 更新于34分钟前

2026年9月1日摄于美国华盛顿的美国最高法院。路透社/亚伦·施瓦茨/档案照片 购买授权,打开新标签页

  • 摘要
  • 共和党制定的选区地图取消了民主党占据的一个席位
  • 密苏里州最高法院叫停新地图,等待全民公投
  • 联邦法院作出有利于共和党地图的裁决
  • 最高法院已两次介入这场争端

9月23日(路透社)——针对密苏里州旨在偏袒共和党的重划国会选区地图的反对者于周二再次向美国最高法院提起诉讼,此前圣路易斯联邦法院再次下令恢复使用该地图,尽管最高法院此前两次作出相反的裁决。他们敦促最高法院在11月的中期选举中暂停使用该地图。

这场围绕密苏里州美国众议院选区构成的争端的最新紧急请求,是9月内第三次将这一争议提交给美国最高司法机构。

通过《每日案卷》通讯将最新法律新闻直接发送到您的收件箱,开启您的清晨。点击此处订阅。

广告 · 滚动继续阅读

9月10日,最高法院叫停了共和党制定的选区地图,这一决定被认为至少解决了11月3日选举的相关问题。但位于圣路易斯的美国第八巡回上诉法院周一裁定必须使用新地图,这让这场地图之争进一步陷入混乱。

唐纳德·特朗普总统所在的共和党正努力维持对国会参众两院的控制权。

随着中期选举临近,包括反对共和党制定的选区地图的“人民而非政客”组织在内的反对者,请求最高法院阻止第八巡回上诉法院的裁决。

广告 · 滚动继续阅读

密苏里州共和党在2025年通过了新的选区地图,该地图废除了长期担任民主党众议员的伊曼纽尔·克利弗在堪萨斯城占据的众议院席位,这是特朗普支持的更广泛行动的一部分,旨在以有利于共和党众议院候选人的方式重划国会选区。

密苏里州最高法院9月3日一致裁定,根据州法律,共和党制定的选区地图在提交选民公投之前,不得在中期选举中使用。

密苏里州官员请求美国最高法院介入,但保守派大法官布雷特·卡瓦诺在9月8日的裁决中驳回了这一请求。

不久之后,特朗普任命的圣路易斯联邦地区法官斯蒂芬·克拉克发布临时命令,禁止使用除2025年重划地图之外的任何地图,因为这些国会选区界线已在密苏里州8月4日的政党初选中使用。

blob:https://www.reuters.com/7dbea468-2bb8-466f-bec3-43dd78a9b763

克拉克是在州最高法院作出不利裁决后,对密苏里州共和党众议员鲍勃·恩德等人提起的诉讼作出的上述裁决。

地图反对者随后转向美国最高法院,最高法院于9月10日阻止密苏里州使用重划后的地图。没有大法官公开反对这份未署名、未作解释的简短命令。在该行动之后,共和党官员表示,中期选举将使用2022年通过的州原有国会选区地图。

但第八巡回上诉法院继续对克拉克现已被搁置的临时命令提起上诉,并于周一维持了克拉克的裁决。由两名特朗普任命的法官和另一名共和党总统任命的法官组成的第八巡回上诉法院小组,还下令克拉克将其临时命令永久化——这一举措将需要最高法院再次介入。

广告 · 滚动继续阅读

安德鲁·钟在纽约报道;威尔·邓汉姆编辑

我们的标准:汤森路透信托原则,打开新标签页

Battle over Missouri’s congressional map reaches US Supreme Court for third time

2026-09-23T08:14:44.244Z / Reuters

By Andrew Chung

September 23, 2026 8:14 AM UTC Updated 34 mins ago

The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 1, 2026. REUTERS/Aaron Schwartz/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

  • Summary
  • Republican-drawn map erased a Democratic-held district
  • Missouri’s top court blocked new map pending referendum
  • Federal courts issued rulings favoring Republican map
  • Supreme Court has intervened in dispute twice already

Sept 23 (Reuters) – Challengers to a redrawn congressional map in Missouri aimed at ​favoring Republicans returned to the US Supreme Court on Tuesday, urging it to halt its use in November’s ‌midterm elections after a St. Louis-based federal court again ordered its reinstatement despite two previous Supreme Court orders to the contrary.

The latest emergency request involving the battle over the makeup of Missouri’s US House of Representatives districts marks the third time in September that the dispute ​has reached the nation’s top judicial body.

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

On September 10, the Supreme Court blocked the Republican-drawn map, a decision thought ​to have settled the matter, at least for the November 3 elections. But the St. Louis-based ⁠8th US Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday ruled that the new map must be used, injecting still further ​confusion into the fight over the map.

President Donald Trump’s fellow Republicans are striving to maintain control of both chambers of Congress.

With the ​midterms looming, the challengers, including a group opposed to the Republican-drawn map called People Not Politicians, asked the Supreme Court to block the 8th Circuit’s ruling.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Missouri Republicans in 2025 adopted the new map, which dismantled a Kansas City-based House district held by longtime Democratic Representative Emanuel ​Cleaver, as part of a broader effort backed by Trump to redraw congressional districts in ways beneficial to Republican House ​candidates.

The Missouri Supreme Court unanimously ruled on September 3 that under state law the Republican-drawn map could not be used in the midterms ‌until it ⁠is first put to a voter referendum.

Missouri officials asked the US Supreme Court to intervene, but were rebuffed on September 8 in a decision made by conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Soon after, US District Judge Stephen Clark in St. Louis, a Trump appointee, issued a temporary order barring any map except for the redrawn 2025 one because those congressional district lines were already ​used in Missouri’s August 4 ​party primary elections.

blob:https://www.reuters.com/7dbea468-2bb8-466f-bec3-43dd78a9b763

Clark acted ⁠in a lawsuit by Republican US Representative Bob Onder of Missouri and other plaintiffs after the unfavorable ruling by the state’s top court.

The map’s opponents then turned to the US Supreme ​Court, which on September 10 blocked Missouri from using the redrawn map. No justice publicly ​dissented from that ⁠brief order, which was unsigned and gave no explanation. Following that action, Republican officials said the midterms would be held using the state’s previous congressional map, passed in 2022.

But the 8th Circuit proceeded with an appeal of Clark’s now-blocked temporary order, and ⁠on Monday ​it upheld Clark’s decision. The 8th Circuit panel, which included two judges ​appointed by Trump and a third by another Republican president, also ordered Clark to make his temporary order permanent — a move that would require renewed ​Supreme Court intervention.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York; Editing by Will Dunham

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2