2026年9月21日 美国东部时间06:52 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻（CBS News）
作者：雅各布·罗森
雅各布·罗森是负责报道美国司法部的记者。此前他曾作为竞选数字记者报道特朗普总统2024年竞选活动，还曾担任《玛格丽特·布伦南与本周面见》节目的副制片人。
查看完整简历
更新于：2026年9月21日 美国东部时间07:01 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
CNN、MS NOW与Politico周一宣布，这三家新闻机构将就特朗普政府对其实施的白宫采访禁令提起诉讼，认为该禁令违反了第一修正案中关于言论自由的规定。
特朗普周五在Truth Social的帖子中表示，他将禁止CNN、MS NOW和Politico进入白宫，这是特朗普政府针对他认为报道不利的新闻机构采取的最新行动。
三家新闻机构在周一的联合声明中表示，他们在周六被拒绝进入白宫且记者证被吊销后，将起诉以立即恢复采访资格。
“这无疑是对第一修正案最直接的攻击，”新闻机构提交的法律动议中写道，“从建国初期开始，历届总统就曾对本国政府的新闻报道基调与内容提出过异议和批评。”
该诉讼请求华盛顿特区的法官尽快采取行动，阻止白宫就该禁令采取进一步措施。作为媒体 pool 团队成员，CNN原计划周一随总统出行。
周五声明发布后，特朗普对记者表示，此时出台禁令“毫无理由”，并暗示此举并非针对某一特定事件。
“我认为不应允许有人前来撰写虚假报道。他们就是假新闻，毫无公信力，”特朗普说，“当然，如果他们想写，那是他们的自由，但我没必要让他们进入我的——进入人民的白宫。”
新闻自由记者委员会主席布鲁斯·布朗称该禁令“完全违宪”。他表示，将新闻机构拒之白宫门外的决定“是典型的基于观点的歧视，如果遭到起诉，法院将很快予以驳回”。
特朗普政府过去曾试图将新闻机构赶出白宫及其他场所。去年，特朗普因美联社拒绝配合他将墨西哥湾改称“美国湾”的声明，禁止其参加部分白宫活动。
这家通讯社随后以违反第一修正案为由提起诉讼，起初华盛顿特区的一名联邦法官裁定白宫必须恢复该通讯社的采访资格，但上诉法院后来允许该禁令生效。
此次上诉裁决的依据是，美联社交际被禁止进入椭圆形办公室、空军一号等仅少数白宫记者团成员可进入的受限区域——这一政策比CNN、MS NOW和Politico遭遇的全面禁令范围更窄。上诉法院法官表示，白宫不能基于记者的观点，将其排除在“对媒体普遍开放”的场所之外，例如新闻简报室。
在法律程序推进期间，白宫接管了媒体 pool 的管理权。媒体 pool是一个小型轮换团队，每日跟随总统报道并向其他新闻机构分发信息和影像。印刷媒体 pool 按轮换机制运作，包括美联社在内的通讯社如今已不像以往那样频繁被允许进入空军一号或椭圆形办公室等场所。
本届政府还限制了新闻机构进入五角大楼的权限。去年，国防部要求获得五角大楼日常采访资格的记者签署一系列规定，其中一条暗示，“索要”敏感信息的记者可能被认定为安全风险，并被逐出五角大楼。包括CBS新闻、ABC新闻、NBC新闻、福克斯新闻和CNN在内的多数新闻机构拒绝签署相关规定，随后离开了五角大楼。
今年早些时候一名法官否决了部分规定后，国防部改变了策略，开始要求所有进入五角大楼的记者必须由政府工作人员陪同。上诉法院允许该政策继续实施。
在特朗普首届政府任期内，白宫曾试图吊销前CNN记者吉姆·阿科斯塔的白宫采访证。CNN提起诉讼后，一名联邦法官支持阿科斯塔，下令恢复其记者证，认定特朗普政府侵犯了阿科斯塔受第五修正案保护的正当程序权利。白宫随后遵守了该裁决。
凯瑟琳·沃森对本文亦有报道贡献
CNN, MS NOW and Politico to sue to restore White House access
2026-09-21 06:52 EDT / CBS News
By Jacob Rosen
Jake Rosen is a reporter covering the Department of Justice. He was previously a campaign digital reporter covering President Trump’s 2024 campaign and also served as an associate producer for “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.”
Read Full Bio
Updated on: September 21, 2026 / 7:01 AM EDT / CBS News
CNN, MS NOW and Politico announced Monday that the news organizations will be filing a lawsuit against the Trump administration over President Trump’s ban of the news outlets from the White House, arguing the ban was unconstitutional on First Amendment grounds.
Mr. Trump said Friday in a Truth Social post that he was barring CNN, MS Now, and Politico from the White House, in the Trump administration’s latest move to target news outlets for what he views as disfavorable coverage.
In a joint statement on Monday, the three news organizations said they are suing to immediately restore access after they were denied entry on Saturday and had their press passes revoked.
“There could not be a more direct assault on the First Amendment,” the legal motion from the news organizations said. “Presidents from the earliest days of the Republic have disagreed with and complained about the tenor and content of press coverage of their administrations.”
The lawsuit is asking a Washington, D.C., judge to move quickly to prevent further action from the White House on the ban. CNN is scheduled to be traveling with the president on Monday as the network pool team.
Speaking to reporters after the announcement on Friday, Mr. Trump said there is “no reason” why the ban was issued when it was, and suggested it wasn’t in response to any specific incident.
“I don’t think somebody should be allowed to come and write fake stories. They’re fake news. And they have no credibility,” Mr. Trump said. “Now, if they want to write them, that’s fine, but I don’t have to let them into my — into the people’s house.”
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press President Bruce Brown called the ban “flatly unconstitutional.” He said the decision to block the outlets from White House grounds was “textbook viewpoint discrimination and will be quickly struck down by the courts if challenged.”
The Trump administration has attempted to remove media outlets from the White House and other spaces in the past. Last year, Mr. Trump barred The Associated Press from attending certain White House events after the news outlet refused to conform to Mr. Trump’s proclamation that the Gulf of Mexico was now the “Gulf of America.”
The wire service sued on First Amendment grounds shortly afterwards, and while a federal judge in D.C. initially ruled that the White House must restore the news outlet’s access, an appeals court later allowed the ban to take effect.
The appellate ruling hinged on the fact that the AP was blocked from certain restricted spaces like the Oval Office and Air Force One that only a small subset of the White House press corps can access — a narrower policy than the outright ban imposed on CNN, MS NOW and Politico. The appeals court judges said the White House can’t ban journalists from spaces that are “generally open to the press,” like the briefing room, based on their viewpoint.
As the legal process played out, the White House assumed control of the press pool, a small, rotating group of journalists who cover the president every day and disseminate information and footage to other news outlets.The print press pool works in rotation so that wire outlets, including the Associated Press, are now not granted access to spaces like Air Force One or the Oval Office as frequently as they once were.
The administration has also curbed news outlets’ access to the Pentagon. Last year, the Defense Department required journalists with daily access to the building to sign onto a slew of rules, including one that suggested reporters who “solicit” sensitive information could be deemed a security risk and kicked out of the Pentagon. Most news outlets — including CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, Fox News and CNN — declined to sign and left the Pentagon.
After a judge struck down some of those rules earlier this year, the Defense Department changed course and began requiring any reporters on Pentagon grounds to be escorted by government personnel. An appeals court allowed that policy to remain in place.
During the first Trump administration, the White House tried to revoke former CNN reporter Jim Acosta’s access to the White House. A federal judge sided with Acosta after CNN sued and ordered his press pass to be restored, finding Acosta’s due process rights under the Fifth Amendment had been violated. The White House obeyed the order.
Kathryn Watson contributed reporting
发表回复