2026-09-15T22:22:38.347Z / 美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）
作者：萨拉·费里斯
更新于13分钟前
更新时间：2026年9月15日，美国东部时间晚上7:47
发布时间：2026年9月15日，美国东部时间晚上6:22
国会新闻 唐纳德·特朗普
杰瑞德·戈尔登众议员与玛丽·格卢森坎普·佩雷斯众议员
盖蒂图片社/美联社
众议院民主党人怒不可遏，此前两名中间派议员再次违抗党领袖，投票助力推进白宫一项关键议程——这是近几周来的第二次。
据一位知情人士透露，民主党高层对这两名议员的不满情绪尤为强烈，尤其是在摇摆选区寻求连任的玛丽·格卢森坎普·佩雷斯众议员，这直接导致周二晚间这位华盛顿州女议员与一位党内高层在众议院 floor 发生对峙。
该人士透露，投票结束后不久，众议院民主党二号人物、党鞭凯瑟琳·克拉克与众议员格卢森坎普·佩雷斯在议会厅内进行了一场激烈对话，似乎提高了嗓门。（另一名倒戈的民主党人、缅因州众议员杰瑞德·戈尔登将在任期结束后退休，受到的党内反弹相对较小。）
两名民主党人倒戈的投票被称为规则投票。通常情况下，少数党议员会团结一致反对这类程序性投票，而多数党需要这类投票才能将法案提交议会全院审议。
民主党人尤为愤怒的是，此次可提交全院审议的法案中包含一项唐纳德·特朗普总统本人支持的俄罗斯制裁法案。白宫将其列为高度优先事项，以至于政府内部有人私下联系至少一名众议院民主党中间派议员，试图说服该议员支持共和党程序性投票，以换取其家乡的社区项目拨款，该议员告诉CNN。该议员最终还是反对了共和党程序性投票。
尽管部分民主党人支持俄罗斯制裁法案，但他们表示，不愿为了通过该法案而支持共和党规则投票——并违背党内领导层的意愿。
“我很自豪能代表美国最大的乌克兰裔社区之一——那些在击败法西斯主义的斗争中失去父母、子女的人们，”格卢森坎普·佩雷斯在X平台上写道，“我今天的投票让我们离将这些制裁法案签署为法律又近了一步，我期待明天投票切断为这场战争提供资金的俄罗斯石油资金流动。”
两名民主党人再次违抗领导层的决定，迅速重新引发了民主党党团内部关于党纪的复杂争论。在上一次事件发生后，民主党人就已经在讨论如何惩罚在关键程序性投票中反对本党的议员。如今，在中期选举前的最后一周议会会期内，相关讨论迅速升温。
另一位民主党高层、众议员皮特·阿吉拉尔随后公开谴责了这两名倒戈者，并表示党团将讨论对这些议员的潜在惩罚措施。
当被问及如何执行党纪时，他表示：“我们作为一个团队将进行一些讨论，然后再采取行动。”
他还对 fellow 民主党同僚发出了简洁的警告：“我们不应该这么做。”
本文已更新补充更多信息。
Two House Democrats defect again on key vote for Trump agenda
2026-09-15T22:22:38.347Z / CNN
By Sarah Ferris
Updated 13 min ago
Updated Sep 15, 2026, 7:47 PM ET
PUBLISHED Sep 15, 2026, 6:22 PM ET
Congressional news Donald Trump
Reps. Jared Golden and Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez.
Getty Images/AP
House Democrats are fuming after a pair of centrist members once again defied their party leaders by voting to help advance a key White House priority — the second time in recent weeks.
The frustrations at those two Democrats — in particular, Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, who is seeking reelection in a battleground seat — are so high that they led to a confrontation on the House floor Tuesday evening between the Washington congresswoman and a top party leader, according to a person familiar with the exchange.
Rep. Katherine Clark, the No. 2 House Democrat and party whip, appeared to raise her voice in an intense conversation on the floor with Gluesenkamp Perez shortly after the vote, that person said. (The other Democratic defector, Rep. Jared Golden of Maine, is retiring after his term and has faced less party blowback.)
The vote the two Democrats defected on is known as a rule vote. Typically, members of the minority party stick together to oppose these kind of procedural votes, which the majority party needs to bring bills to the floor.
Democrats are particularly irate given that one of the bills that can now be brought to the floor is a Russian sanctions bill that President Donald Trump himself has championed. The White House has made it such a high priority that some in the administration privately reached out to at least one House Democratic centrist, attempting to convince that member to support the GOP procedural vote in exchange for a community project back home, that member told CNN. That member ultimately opposed the GOP procedural vote.
While some Democrats support the Russia sanctions bill, they said they were not willing to back a GOP rule — and cross party leadership — to get that result.
“I’m proud to represent one of the largest Ukrainian communities in America — people who have lost fathers, mothers, sons and daughters in the fight to defeat fascism,” Gluesenkamp Perez said on X, adding, “My vote today gets us one step closer to enacting these sanctions into law and I look forward to voting tomorrow to cut off the flow of Russian oil money fueling this war.”
The decision by the two Democrats to once again flout their leadership has quickly resurfaced a complicated debate about party discipline within the caucus. Democrats had already been discussing ways to punish members who oppose the party on key procedural votes after the last episode. Now, in the final week of session before the midterms, those conversations are quickly heating up.
Another top Democrat, Rep. Pete Aguilar, later called out the two defectors and said their caucus would discuss potential punishments for the members.
Asked about enforcing party discipline, he said, “We’ll have some conversations as a family, and we’ll go from there.”
And he issued a terse warning to fellow Democrats about the behavior: “That’s not what we should be doing.”
This story has been updated with additional information.
发表回复