大法官驳回特朗普政府在2026年中期选举前暂停针对美国邮政总局新投票规则禁令的请求
2026年9月15日 美国东部时间11:25 / 福克斯新闻
前特朗普官员详解最高法院赢得邮寄投票官司后后续进展
吉恩·汉密尔顿解释了该裁决允许政府接下来采取的行动、各州何时可能再次提起诉讼，以及联邦机构如何在中期选举前落实特朗普的邮寄投票行政令。
NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章！
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/2af2768a-3192-4d0b-84b6-a77a50831f67
收听本文
3分钟
当地时间周二，美国最高法院驳回特朗普政府有关邮寄投票的重大诉讼请求后，总统唐纳德·特朗普猛烈抨击了最高法院。
“共和党又从美国最高法院拿到了一项糟糕的裁决，最高法院花了极长时间才作出该裁决，还将部分责任归咎于没有时间出台解决方案，以应对我们完全腐败、失控的邮寄投票‘灾难’——这在全世界都是个笑话，我们是唯一一个不得不忍受这种摧毁国家的骗局的国家，”特朗普写道。
总统随后称赞了在周一的裁决中持不同意见的大法官塞缪尔·阿利托和克拉伦斯·托马斯，称两人是“传奇人物”。
最高法院驳回特朗普在中期选举前恢复严格邮寄选票规则的诉求
美国华盛顿特区白宫椭圆形办公室，2026年3月31日周二，唐纳德·特朗普总统展示签署的行政令。特朗普当日签署行政令，旨在加大选民邮寄选票的难度，升级了他长期以来针对数百万美国人使用的邮寄投票方式的运动。(亚伦·施瓦茨/CNP/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社)
“这对共和党乃至美国本身都是重大损失，让激进左翼‘民主党人’在邮寄选票上作弊变得容易得多——现在他们可以毫无阻碍地这么做了！”特朗普写道。
特朗普随后列举了最高法院令他失望的一系列判例，包括推翻其关税政策的裁决，以及废除他终止出生公民权的行政令的判决。
特朗普点名批评两名最高法院大法官就关税裁决发声
“我很难写出对美国最高法院的这番批评——这可能会让我在未来多年付出沉重代价，但作为总统，我觉得为了我们热爱的美国，这么做是我的义务和责任！”他写道。
美国最高法院大法官塞缪尔·阿利托，2022年10月7日，华盛顿特区。(亚历克斯·王/盖蒂图片社)
周一的裁决驳回了特朗普政府请求暂停执行针对美国邮政总局新邮寄选票规则的全面禁令。
这些新规要求联邦选举邮寄选票必须使用带有选举邮件标识的信封，该标识可被高速扫描设备识别，并带有每位选民独有的条形码。
州和地方选举官员还需向美国邮政总局提交信封设计方案供审核，并将基本选民信息上传至美国邮政总局的在线门户。
根据拟议规则，拒绝提供邮寄投票选民信息的州，美国邮政总局将不会递送选票
根据美国邮政总局的规则，不符合要求的邮件将不会被接收，而是退还给选举官员进行更正并重新提交。
最高法院周一的裁决未附多数意见，但大法官布雷特·卡瓦诺发表了协同意见，为特朗普未来可能获胜留下了空间。不过他仍认为，距离选举日太近，无法在2026年中期选举前切实落实这些规则。
美国最高法院大法官布雷特·卡瓦诺在副总统JD·万斯位于华盛顿特区的官邸举办的早餐会上，看着爱尔兰总理米歇尔·马丁发言，这是他为期一周访美行程的一部分。图片拍摄日期：2025年3月12日周三(尼尔·卡森/PA Images via 盖蒂图片社)
点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP
“在我看来，基于法院目前在临时阶段收到的陈述，这项最终规则至少有充分的可能性属于美国邮政总局的法定权限范围，”卡瓦诺写道。“但在2026年选举中执行该规则将是武断且反复无常的，违反《行政程序法》，因为州和地方选举官员没有足够的时间在选举前合理落实该规则。”
安德斯·哈格斯特伦是福克斯新闻数字频道的记者，报道全国政治及重大突发新闻事件。
Trump blasts Supreme Court ‘disaster’ after justices rule against him on mail in voting
Justices rejected the administration’s request to stay an injunction against new USPS ballot rules ahead of 2026 midterms
September 15, 2026 11:25am EDT / Fox News
Former Trump official breaks down what comes next after Supreme Court mail-voting win
Gene Hamilton explains what the ruling allows the administration to do next, when states could return to court and how federal agencies may move to implement Trump’s mail-voting order ahead of the midterms.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/2af2768a-3192-4d0b-84b6-a77a50831f67
Listen to this article
3 min
President Donald Trump lashed out at the Supreme Court on Tuesday after justices ruled against his administration on a major mail-in voting initiative.
“Republicans just got another bad decision from the United States Supreme Court, one that the Court System took forever to give, and then blamed it, in part, on no time left to implement a solution to our totally CORRUPT and out of control Mail-In voting ‘disaster,’ which is a laughing stock all over the World, and where we are the only country that has to endure such a Nation Destroying SCAM,” Trump wrote.
The president went on to praise Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, who dissented from Monday’s order. Trump called the pair “legends.”
SUPREME COURT REJECTS TRUMP BID TO REVIVE STRICT MAIL-BALLOT RULES BEFORE MIDTERMS
US President Donald Trump displays a signed executive order in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, March 31, 2026. Trump signed an executive order Tuesday intended to make it harder for voters to cast mail-in ballots, escalating his long-running campaign against a practice used by millions of Americans.(Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
“It is a big loss for Republicans, and America itself, and makes cheating by the Radical Left ‘Dumocrats,’ on Mail-In Ballots, a much easier thing to do – And now they have an open field to do so!” Trump wrote.
Trump went on to list a series of cases where the Supreme Court has disappointed him, including its decision to strike down his tariff policies and void his executive order ending birthright citizenship.
TRUMP CRITICIZES 2 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES BY NAME OVER TARIFF RULING
“It is not easy for me to write this criticism of the United States Supreme Court – it will likely cost me dearly for years to come – but I feel it my obligation and duty, as President, to do so for the America we love!” he wrote.
United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Samuel Alito on October 7, 2022 in Washington, D.C.(Alex Wong/Getty Images)
The Monday order rejected the Trump administration’s request for a stay in the implementation of a universal injunction against new mail-in ballot rules from the U.S. Postal Service.
The rules would require federal ballot mail to be sent in envelopes bearing an election-mail logo, capable of being scanned by high-speed equipment and carrying a barcode unique to each voter.
State and local election officials would also be required to submit envelope designs to the Postal Service for review and upload basic voter information to an online USPS portal.
USPS WOULDN’T DELIVER BALLOTS IN STATES THAT REFUSE TO FORK OVER MAIL-IN VOTER INFO UNDER PROPOSED RULE
Under the USPS rule, mailings that failed to comply would not be accepted and would instead be returned to election officials to correct and resubmit.
The Court’s Monday order went unsigned, but Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a concurring opinion that allowed room for a potential Trump victory down the line. He nevertheless argued that it is too close to Election Day to realistically implement the rules for the 2026 midterm elections.
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States Brett Kavanaugh watches as Taoiseach Micheal Martin speaks at a breakfast meeting hosted by US Vice President JD Vance at his official residence in Washington DC, , as part of his week long visit to the US. Picture date: Wednesday March 12, 2025(Niall Carson/PA Images via Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“In my view, based on the briefing the Court has received at this interim stage, there is at least a fair prospect that the final rule falls within the Postal Service’s statutory authority,” Kavanaugh wrote. “But applying the rule in the 2026 elections would be arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act because state and local election officials do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the elections.”
Anders Hagstrom is a reporter with Fox News Digital covering national politics and major breaking news events.
发表回复