2026年9月10日 / 美国东部时间晚上7:33 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
撰稿
经济学家表示,如果共和党在中期选举中继续掌控国会,特朗普总统承诺向每位美国成年人发放5000美元现金,这一举措将推高联邦赤字、重新推高通胀并引发投资者担忧。
特朗普周三晚间在共和党全国委员会中期选举大会上提出这一分红计划后,副总统JD·万斯在接受福克斯新闻采访时表示,美国将利用特朗普政府征收的关税收入为这笔拨款提供资金,并表示该计划将面向中产阶级。
税收基金会联邦税收政策中心高级研究员埃丽卡·约克在接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻采访时表示,这些关税每年可带来约1250亿美元的收入,仅为向美国约2.45亿成年人口每人发放5000美元所需1.25万亿美元资金的十分之一。
约克估计,由于关税收入不足,美国可能需要发行政府债券来为分红买单,将联邦赤字从目前的约1.8万亿美元推高至3万亿美元。
分红计划为何会推高通胀
这笔一次性付款还可能通过刺激消费热潮推高通胀,就像疫情期间多轮联邦刺激支票所产生的效果一样。
经济学家表示,这些刺激支票推动消费者物价在2022年6月达到40年来的峰值。
约克表示,5000美元的现金发放还会扰乱金融市场。在美国国债规模近期首次突破40万亿美元之际,美国国债买家可能会要求更高的收益率,以抵消日益增加的财政风险。
“如果金融市场已经在担忧美国的预算赤字——目前赤字规模处于历史高位且预计还会扩大,而你传递的信息却是‘我们根本不在乎,我们几乎要让赤字翻倍’——这简直是疯了,”约克在评价特朗普的提案时说道。
主张削减美国赤字的无党派智库负责任联邦预算委员会主席玛雅·麦奎因纳斯周四在一份声明中表示,向美国人提供此类付款“在财政上是危险的”。
“很难理解,任何人在审视我们当前的财政和经济状况后,怎么会认为我们需要再借入1.2万亿美元向所有人发放现金,”她说道。
白宫表示,特朗普“一贯证明质疑者是错的”。
白宫发言人戴维斯·英格尔在给哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的一份声明中表示:“末日论者和反对者一贯质疑特朗普总统:当他承诺创建历史性的特朗普账户、通过最惠国条款降低处方药价格、确保边境无人越境、整顿我们的街道、结束小费税、提高实际工资、重新谈判失败的贸易协定并将关键制造业回迁美国时,他们都曾质疑过。”
债务负担进一步加重
许多财政鹰派人士已敦促议员们着手解决不断攀升的联邦债务问题。由于多轮减税和新冠疫情相关支出等因素,美国联邦债务在不到十年的时间里翻了一番。
约克表示,在国家账目中新增1.25万亿美元债务“完全脱离了财政现实”。
不断上升的美国债务推高了国家的利息成本,目前美国政府在债务付息上的支出已经超过了国防或医疗保险的开支。由于联邦财政前景恶化,投资者要求更高的美国国债收益率。这反过来又推高了消费者的借贷成本,包括抵押贷款、汽车贷款和个人贷款。
“债券市场已经在为通胀和美国40万亿美元的债务感到焦虑,”海军联邦信用合作社首席经济学家希瑟·朗在一封电子邮件中说道,“这可能会导致借贷成本进一步飙升。”
朗补充道,由于这些问题,华尔街“基本上不予理会”特朗普政府的分红计划,认为该计划不太可能在国会获得通过,而国会必须批准这项提案。
特朗普总统周四在接受哥伦比亚广播公司得克萨斯分社的独家采访时表示,他认为议员们无需批准这5000美元的拨款。
在周三的演讲中,特朗普还提出了其他降低美国人生活成本的方案。民调显示,生活成本是11月选举前的关键竞选议题。其中包括可能取消信用卡刷卡手续费,他表示这每年可为普通家庭节省约1200美元。
但5000美元的付款计划最受关注,这可能是因为许多消费者表示他们正在为生活成本发愁,汽油价格仍维持在每加仑4美元以上,通胀仍处于高位。
定于周五发布的8月份消费者物价指数数据预计将显示,通胀按年率计算上涨3.3%,远高于美联储设定的2%的年度目标。
约克在接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻采访时表示,虽然5000美元的付款可能会在最初帮助陷入困境的消费者,但此类计划很快会适得其反,进一步推高通胀。圣路易斯联邦储备银行2023年的研究显示,新冠疫情刺激支票在疫情期间推动通胀上涨了2.6%。
“当经济实际上并不需要刺激的时候,我们却用5000美元的付款以如此大规模的方式刺激经济,”她说,“你实际上是在加剧你本打算通过这项提案解决的问题。”
编辑:阿兰·谢特
Trump’s $5,000 dividend would reignite inflation and swell the U.S. deficit, economists say
September 10, 2026 / 7:33 PM EDT / CBS News
By
President Trump’s vow to send $5,000 to every U.S. adult if the Republican Party keeps control of Congress in the midterm elections would drive up the federal deficit, reignite inflation and alarm investors, according to economists.
After Mr. Trump raised the idea of such a dividend on Wednesday night at the Republican National Committee’s midterm convention, Vice President JD Vance told Fox News that the U.S. would fund the payment using tariff revenue collected by the Trump administration, and that it would be aimed at the middle class.
Those tariffs are generating about $125 billion in annual revenue — one-tenth of the $1.25 trillion that would be required to pay $5,000 to each of the nation’s roughly 245 million U.S. adults, Erica York, senior economist with the Tax Foundation’s Center for Federal Tax Policy, told CBS News.
Because tariff revenue would fall short, the U.S. would likely need to issue government debt to pay for the dividends, raising the federal deficit to $3 trillion, up from its current level of about $1.8 trillion, York estimated.
Why the dividend would drive inflation
The one-time payments would also likely stoke inflation by fueling a surge in consumer spending, as did the multiple federal stimulus checks during the pandemic.
Economists say those payments contributed to consumer prices reaching a 40-year high in June 2022.
A $5,000 giveaway would also rattle financial markets, York said. With the nation’s debt recently surpassing$40 trillion for the first time, Treasury bond buyers would likely demand higher yields to offset increased fiscal risks, she added.
“If financial markets are already concerned about U.S. budget deficits, which are historically large and are projected to grow, and the message that you’re giving is, ‘We don’t really care. We’re almost going to double our deficits’ — that’s madness,” York said of Mr. Trump’s proposal.
Offering such a payment to Americans would be “fiscally dangerous,” Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan think tank that favors reducing the U.S. deficit, said in a statement on Thursday.
“It’s hard to understand how anyone could look at our current fiscal and economic situation and think we need to borrow another $1.2 trillion to send everyone cash,” she said.
The White House said that Mr. Trump has “consistently proven his doubters wrong.”
“The doomers and naysayers have consistently doubted President Trump: when he pledged to create the historic Trump Accounts, lowered prescription prices with Most Favored Nations, secured the border with no crossings, cleaned up our streets, ended taxes on tips, grew real wages, renegotiated broken trade deals and reshored key manufacturing back to the United States,” White House spokesperson Davis Ingle said in a statement to CBS News.
Piling on debt
Many fiscal hawks have urged lawmakers to start addressing the mounting federal debt, which has doubled in less than a decade due to multiple tax cuts and COVID-related spending, among other factors.
Adding $1.25 trillion in debt to the nation’s ledger is “completely detached from fiscal reality,” York said.
Rising U.S. debt has pushed up the nation’s interest costs, with the U.S. government now spending more on servicing its debt than on national defense or Medicare. Investors are demanding higher Treasury yields due to the worsening federal fiscal outlook. That, in turn, is pushing up borrowing costs for consumers, including mortgages, auto loans and personal loans.
“The bond market is already nervous about inflation and America’s $40 trillion debt,” Heather Long, chief economist at the Navy Federal Credit Union, said in an email. “This would likely cause borrowing costs to jump even further.”
Long added that because of those issues, Wall Street is “largely ignoring” the Trump administration’s dividend plan, writing it off as unlikely to gain traction with Congress, which would need to approve it.
In an exclusive interview with CBS News Texas, President Trump said on Thursday that he doesn’t think lawmakers would need to approve the $5,000 payments.
During his speech on Wednesday, Mr. Trump also proposed other ways to lower the cost of living for Americans, which polls show is a key campaign issue ahead of the November elections. That includes possibly eliminating credit card swipe fees, which he said could save the typical family about $1,200 a year.
But the $5,000 payment has garnered the most attention, likely because many consumers say they’re struggling with the cost of living, with gas prices remaining above $4 a gallon and inflation still elevated.
Consumer Price Index data for August, set to be released on Friday, is expected to show inflation rose at an annual pace of 3.3%, well above the Federal Reserve’s annual target of 2%.
While a $5,000 payment might initially help struggling consumers, such a program would soon backfire by driving inflation even higher, York told CBS News. The COVID stimulus checks caused inflation to rise by 2.6% during the pandemic, according to 2023 research from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
“We would be stimulating the economy in a really massive way with $5,000 payments, when the economy is not really calling for that,” she said. “You’re really kind of worsening the problem that you’re supposedly trying to address with this proposal.”
Edited by Alain Sherter
发表回复