美国多州起诉特朗普政府削弱濒危物种保护措施

US states sue Trump administration for weakening endangered species protections

2026-09-09 16:34:55 UTC / Reuters

By Jonathan Stempel

September 9, 2026 4:34 PM UTC Updated 37 mins ago

A bald eagle perches on a branch covered in snow during a winter storm in Nyack, New York, U.S., December 14, 2025. REUTERS/Mike Segar/File Photo

• States challenge narrowed definition of harm, rules allegedly putting business over animal protections
• Endangered Species Act credited with saving bald eagle, other animals from extinction
• Interior Department objects to ‘regulatory overreach,’ says it should follow law’s text

Sept 9 (Reuters) – U.S. states filed two lawsuits on ​Wednesday accusing President Donald Trump’s administration of illegally weakening the federal Endangered Species Act, a landmark law that has shielded the bald eagle ​and other wildlife from dangers posed by development.

The lawsuits by the Democratic attorneys general of 20 states and Washington, D.C. were filed less than two months after the Department of the Interior and the Department of Commerce announced final rules that could make it easier for developers, fossil fuel companies and others to disturb lands that environmental advocates say need protection from business interests.

The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

In one ​lawsuit, the states challenged a rule that narrowed the Endangered Species Act’s definition of “harm,” which had long included encroachments on habitats where endangered animals live. The new ​rule allows oil drilling, mining and other activities in those habitats so long as those activities do not directly kill or ⁠injure the animals.

The other lawsuit challenges two rules. One rule eliminates broad protections for newly threatened species unless the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, part of the ​Interior Department, creates species-specific protections. The second rule requires the government to consider objections by businesses before declaring areas as “critical habitats.”

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

“The Trump administration is trying to undermine the law, the will ​of Congress and the will of the people who overwhelmingly support protections for endangered species,” Washington Attorney General Nick Brown said at a press conference. “Instead of stewardship, this administration’s approach to our land, to our water is one of exploitation.”

INTERIOR DEPARTMENT RESISTS ‘OVERREACH’

Both lawsuits were filed in federal courts in northern California, targeting actions by the Fish and Wildlife Service and by the National Marine ​Fisheries Service, part of the Commerce Department.

Copies of the complaints were not immediately available. Environmental groups have also sued to block the revised definition of harm.

“The role ​of federal agencies is to faithfully implement the Endangered Species Act as written, not to expand its reach through interpretations favored by advocacy organizations,” an Interior Department spokesperson said.

blob:https://www.reuters.com/3da59b69-6f72-45a1-8bcd-e87691804499

“This lawsuit seeks ‌to preserve a ⁠decades-old regulatory overreach that expanded the Endangered Species Act beyond the authority granted by Congress,” the spokesperson added. “The department will vigorously defend its authority to implement the law according to its plain text.”

A spokesperson for the fisheries service said that agency does not discuss pending litigation.

Democratic-led states have filed dozens of lawsuits challenging sweeping policy changes during the second White House term of Trump, a Republican.

FUTURE GENERATIONS BENEFIT FROM LAW, STATE AG SAYS

Enacted by Congress in 1973, the Endangered Species Act has been credited with ​saving animals including the California condor, grizzly ​bear and humpback whale from possible ⁠extinction.

Weakening the law aligns with Trump’s goal to reduce regulations that he says constrain American businesses.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

These include the scaling back of a variety of environmental initiatives and standards, including by reducing government support for clean energy and repealing a scientific finding by former President Barack ​Obama’s administration that climate change threatens public health.

Many wildlife advocates consider habitat loss the biggest cause of animal extinction.

“We owe future ​generations a world where ⁠bald eagles soar, sea turtles swim and all wildlife thrives,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement.

LESS DEFERENCE TO FEDERAL AGENCIES

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum has said the Endangered Species Act has been “weaponized” to stop a myriad of projects, weakening competitiveness, undermining national security, and hurting Americans’ pocketbooks.

He has said the new rules more closely align the law ⁠with its ​original intent.

The changes follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in 2024 to overrule a 40-year-old precedent that required ​courts to defer to federal agencies’ reasonable interpretations of laws they administer.

Wednesday’s lawsuits were led by Washington State, California, Maryland and Massachusetts. Other plaintiffs include New York, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of ​Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia and Wisconsin.

Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Cynthia Osterman and David Gregorio

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.