2026-09-03T10:02:13.647Z / 路透社
纽约9月3日电(路透社)——不到一年前,得克萨斯州州长格雷格·阿博特还将该州誉为“人工智能发展的中心”。如今,在连任竞选期间,他却呼吁对数据中心实施全面的新限制。
而他绝非孤例。
订阅《每日案卷》简报,清晨直达最新法律资讯
请点击此处注册。
全美范围内,随着民主党在11月中期选举前借民众对数据中心的反对浪潮造势,共和党人正日益背离美国总统唐纳德·特朗普的亲人工智能议程。
至少五个州的共和党候选人——包括密歇根州、威斯康星州和宾夕法尼亚州——近期在数据中心问题上采取了更强硬的言辞,或提议限制其发展,这在共和党内部形成了新的分歧。
“这场辩论正将支持经济增长的本能和在人工智能竞赛中击败中国的努力,与民众对负担能力的强烈反对对立起来,”紫色战略咨询公司的共和党战略家布拉德·戴斯普林说道。
最引人注目的转变发生在得克萨斯州——这个以保守派为主、盛产石油的州多年来一直致力于将自身重塑为全国科技中心。充足的土地和友好的商业法规吸引了太空探索技术公司(SpaceX)和甲骨文公司(Oracle)等顶尖科技企业,也招揽了埃隆·马斯克等富豪企业家。
即便在这里,公众舆论也已急剧转向反对数据中心。反对者称,数据中心推高了水电账单,灯光污染了夜空,且并未创造足够的税收收入或就业岗位来抵消各州为其提供的激励政策。
得克萨斯州政治项目8月的一项民调显示,仅有30%的受访者会支持在自己社区内建设数据中心。
根据选举记录、公司和委员会披露信息,大型科技公司正奋起直追,已为中期选举投入超过3亿美元,并展开大规模广告宣传活动,向消费者普及数据中心的益处。
但随着反对声浪蔓延,阿博特呼吁对数据中心出台广泛的新规定,废除针对其建设的税收激励政策,并限制在农村社区的开发。他于8月3日宣布的一项州审计已 effectively暂停了新电网连接的审批。
共和党总检察长肯·帕克斯顿目前正处于一场激烈的参议院竞选当中,他在人工智能问题上的立场也趋于强硬,于上月末公布了一项计划。其竞选团队称,该计划将保持美国的竞争力,同时阻止“数据中心的负面影响”。
阿博特和帕克斯顿的立场转变使其与党首特朗普产生分歧。特朗普周一在“真相社交”平台的帖子中警告称,反对数据中心的美国人最终可能会“落后且贫穷”。
共和党官员淡化了与特朗普的分歧。
“我们将建议候选人做对他们及其社区最有利的事,”共和党全国委员会全国新闻秘书娜塔莉·巴尔达萨雷说道,“这不是一刀切的做法。”
角力造势
得克萨斯州是全美人工智能相关数据中心发展规模最大、增速最快的市场之一,其境内拥有开放人工智能公司(OpenAI)位于阿比林的旗舰星门园区,以及其他多个大型项目。
帕克斯顿曾将人工智能数据中心视为就业创造和经济增长的引擎。2013年,作为州参议员的他投票支持一项税收激励政策,该政策后来成为得克萨斯州数据中心投资的主要推动力。
今年2月,得克萨斯州胡德县的地方官员请求帕克斯顿就他们是否有权暂时叫停数据中心开发发表意见。据总检察长办公室网站消息,该请求至今仍在处理中。
帕克斯顿的民主党对手詹姆斯·塔拉里科指责他搞政治机会主义,并指出他接受了科技行业的竞选捐款。
“他害怕自己与大型数据中心公司的关联会让他输掉选举,所以可悲地试图改变立场,”塔拉里科在一份声明中说道。
帕克斯顿的竞选团队未回应有关其在数据中心问题上立场转变的提问,但指责塔拉里科也从部分相同的企业利益集团手中拿钱,并在2023年担任得克萨斯州参议员时投票支持针对大型数据中心的销售税激励政策。
“他是个伪君子,被沿海亿万富翁捐赠者收买,”帕克斯顿的竞选团队在一份声明中说道。
分析师表示,两位候选人都试图将自己定位为对抗财力雄厚的捐赠者的民粹主义者,这一迹象表明形势已发生巨大变化。
长期以来一直将自己定位为美国企业捍卫者的共和党人,如今越来越认识到“与这些数据中心背后的大型科技公司保持一定距离很重要”,马里兰大学政治学家大卫·卡罗尔说道。
在州长竞选活动中,阿博特的民主党竞争对手吉娜·希诺霍萨将数据中心问题称为“本届选举季的斗争焦点”。
“所有人都知道,他暂停新数据中心开发审批的政策将在11月4日,也就是选举次日到期,”希诺霍萨在一次采访中说道。
阿博特竞选团队的新闻秘书爱德华多·莱尔在一份声明中表示,州长“已指示得克萨斯州监管机构确保数据中心不会占用社区所需的水资源或得克萨斯州电网所需的电力……降低消费者的电费,并为自身的电力基础设施买单”。
大型科技公司奋起直追
观察人士称,数据中心之所以成为今年中期选举的突出议题,是因为大型科技公司对公众反对声浪的反应迟缓。
“两年来民众一直在反对,但该行业并未以所需的力度参与其中,”曾为共和党总统候选人米特·罗姆尼担任顾问的资深政治战略家凯文·马登说道。
顶尖人工智能公司正试图弥补这一失误。
联邦选举备案文件显示,与安道拓人工智能公司(Anthropic)有关联的两个超级政治行动委员会已在得克萨斯州花费超过260万美元,而与开放人工智能公司联合创始人格雷格·布罗克曼有关联的超级政治行动委员会在该州的花费已超过480万美元。根据税务备案文件,元宇宙公司(Meta)已向一个专注于得克萨斯州州级官员候选人的超级政治行动委员会捐赠了约140万美元。
但对于数据中心的支持者来说,改变舆论将是一场艰苦的战斗,他们如今同时面临来自民主党和共和党的反对。
“在两党似乎在所有问题上都存在分歧的当下,两党都反对数据中心,这一点令人震惊,”卡罗尔说道。
海伦·科斯特和唐·科佩基纽约报道;杰西·梅斯纳-哈奇和阿利斯泰尔·贝尔编辑
Texas Republicans turn against data centers, putting big tech on notice
2026-09-03T10:02:13.647Z / Reuters
NEW YORK, Sept 3 (Reuters) – Less than a year ago, Texas Governor Greg Abbott hailed Texas as the “epicenter of AI development.” Now, in his bid for re-election, he is calling for sweeping new restrictions on data centers.
And he’s hardly alone.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
Across the country, as Democrats ride a wave of local opposition to data centers ahead of the November elections, Republicans are increasingly breaking from U.S. President Donald Trump’s pro-AI agenda.
Republican candidates in at least five states – including Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania – have recently adopted tougher rhetoric on data centers or proposed restrictions on their development, creating a new fault line within the party.
The debate is “pitting pro-growth instincts and the push to beat China in the AI race against a populist backlash over affordability,” said Brad Dayspring, a Republican strategist with Purple Strategies.
The most striking shift is happening in Texas, a conservative, oil-rich state that has worked for years to reinvent itself as a national tech hub. Abundant land and business-friendly regulations have attracted leading tech companies like SpaceX
and Oracle
and lured wealthy entrepreneurs like Elon Musk.
Even there, though, public sentiment has turned sharply against data centers, which opponents say drive up electric and water bills, pollute the night sky with lights and don’t create enough tax revenue or jobs to justify the incentives states have paid.
An August poll by the Texas Politics Project found only 30% of respondents would support a data center in their community.
Big tech companies are trying to play catch-up, pouring more than $300 million into the midterms, according to election records, company and committee disclosures, and rolling out a massive ad campaign to educate consumers about the benefits of data centers.
But as the backlash spreads, Abbott is calling for expansive new regulations on data centers, the repeal of tax incentives for their construction and restrictions on development in rural communities. A state audit he announced on August 3 has effectively paused approvals for new grid connections.
Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, locked in a tight Senate race, has also hardened his stance on AI, unveiling a plan late last month that his campaign says will keep America competitive while stopping the “negative impact of data centers.”
Abbott and Paxton’s rhetorical pivot puts them at odds with Trump, the leader of their party, who warned in a Truth Social post Monday that Americans fighting data centers risked ending up “backwards and poor.”
Republican officials have downplayed the split with Trump.
“We’re going to advise our candidates to do what’s best for them and their communities,” said Natalie Baldassarre, national press secretary for the Republican National Committee. “It’s not a one-size-fits-all approach.”
JOCKEYING FOR POSITION
Texas is one of the nation’s largest and fastest-growing markets for AI-related data center development, hosting OpenAI’s flagship Stargate campus in Abilene, among other major projects.
Paxton once embraced AI data centers as an engine of job creation and economic growth. As a state senator in 2013, he voted for a tax incentive that later became a major driver of data-center investment in Texas.
In February, local commissioners in Hood County, Texas, requested Paxton’s opinion on whether they had the legal authority to temporarily halt development of data centers. Half a year later, the request is still pending, according to the attorney general’s website.
Paxton’s opponent, Democrat James Talarico, has accused him of political opportunism, pointing to campaign contributions he’s accepted from the tech industry.
“He’s scared his ties to big data center companies will lose him the election, so he’s making a sad attempt to reverse course,” Talarico said in a statement.
The Paxton campaign did not respond to questions about his shifting position on data centers, but accused Talarico of taking money from some of the same corporate interests and voting for a sales tax incentive for large data centers as a Texas state senator in 2023.
“He’s a hypocrite who’s bought and paid for by his coastal billionaire donors,” Paxton’s campaign said in a statement.
Both candidates trying to position themselves as populists standing up to deep-pocketed donors is a sign, analysts say, of how much the ground has shifted.
For Republicans especially, who have long positioned themselves as champions of corporate America, there is growing recognition that “it’s important to put some distance between themselves and the big tech companies behind these data centers,” said David Karol, a political scientist at the University of Maryland.
In the governor’s race, Abbott’s Democratic opponent Gina Hinojosa has called data centers “the fight of this election season.”
“Everybody knows that his temporary pause on the approval of new data center developments ends November 4, the day after the election,” Hinojosa said in an interview.
Eduardo Leal, press secretary for Abbott’s campaign, said in a statement that the governor “has directed Texas regulators to ensure data centers do not take water needed by communities or power needed by the Texas grid … lower electricity costs for consumers, and pay for their own electricity infrastructure.”
BIG TECH PLAYS CATCH-UP
That data centers have become such a prominent feature of this year’s midterm elections is a product of big tech being slow to respond to public backlash, observers say.
“Two years of local opposition and the industry wasn’t necessarily engaging at the level they needed to,” said veteran political strategist Kevin Madden, a former adviser to Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney.
Leading AI companies are trying to rectify the mistake.
Two super PACs with ties to Anthropic have so far spent more than $2.6 million in Texas, while super PACs linked to OpenAI co-founder Greg Brockman have spent more than $4.8 million across the state, federal election filings show. Meta
has given about $1.4 million to a super PAC focused on candidates for state office in Texas, according to tax filings.
But changing the conversation will be an uphill battle for data center supporters, who now face resistance from Democrats and Republicans alike.
“It’s striking at a time when the parties seem to disagree on everything that there’s been bipartisan movement against data centers,” Karol said.
Reporting by Helen Coster and Dawn Kopecki in New York; Editing by Jesse Mesner-Hage and Alistair Bell
发表回复