美国法官叫停五角大楼对Anthropic的黑名单制裁


2026-08-28T01:27:19.988Z / 路透社

作者:杰克·奎因
2026年8月28日 凌晨1:27 UTC 更新于1小时前

2026年6月5日拍摄的插画中,Anthropic标志、键盘与机械手同框 路透社/达多·鲁维奇/插画

  • Anthropic指控五角大楼负责人越权 五角大楼称国家安全风险认定合法
  • 林法官认定该认定“非法且毫无依据”

8月27日(路透社)——美国一名法官周四叫停了五角大楼对AI企业Anthropic的黑名单制裁,这是这家Claude大模型开发商与军方围绕战场AI安全展开的高风险博弈的最新进展。

Anthropic在加州联邦法院提起的诉讼指控,国防部长皮特·赫格斯将Anthropic列为国家安全供应链风险企业的行为越权。美国政府可将此类标签贴给那些可能让军事系统面临对手渗透或破坏风险的公司。

即刻订阅《每日案卷》新闻简报,将最新法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱,开启您的清晨资讯之旅。点击此处注册

广告 · 继续向下滚动

赫格斯的这一前所未有的举措阻断了Anthropic参与部分军事合同的资格,此前Anthropic拒绝允许美军将其Claude AI大模型用于美国监视或自主武器系统。Anthropic高管曾表示,此举可能让公司损失数十亿美元业务,并损害其声誉。

美国地区法官丽塔·林由前民主党总统乔·拜登任命,她在一份长达59页的裁决书中作出上述判决,认定五角大楼的决定“非法且毫无依据”。

“空洞地援引国家安全,并非惩罚和报复政府批评者的空白支票,”她写道。

广告 · 继续向下滚动

Anthropic对这一裁决表示欢迎,并在一份声明中表示,该公司仍“致力于与政府富有成效地合作,利用人工智能服务于国家安全,让所有美国人都能从这项技术中获益”。

五角大楼未立即回应置评请求。

Anthropic认为,AI大模型的可靠性不足以安全应用于自主武器系统,并且反对将其用于国内监视,称此举侵犯人权,但五角大楼则表示,私营企业不应能够限制军事行动。

五角大楼此次将Anthropic列为供应链风险企业,是美国首次根据一项旨在保护军事系统免受外国破坏的冷僻政府采购法规,公开将一家美国公司列入此类名单。

在3月9日提起的诉讼中,Anthropic指控政府违反了宪法第一修正案赋予其的言论自由权,对其有关AI安全的观点进行报复。该公司表示,自己未获得申辩机会,这违反了第五修正案赋予其的正当程序权利。

blob:https://www.reuters.com/dadf876c-9d69-4161-9b60-98544c623d09

诉讼称,这一决定非法、缺乏事实依据,且与军方此前对Claude的赞誉相悖。

根据一份法庭文件,美国司法部反驳称,Anthropic拒绝解除限制可能导致五角大楼在如何使用Claude问题上陷入不确定性,并可能在行动期间导致军事系统失效。

政府表示,此次认定源于Anthropic拒绝接受合同条款,而非其有关AI安全的观点。

Anthropic在华盛顿特区还有另一桩待决诉讼,涉及五角大楼的另一项供应链风险认定,该认定可能导致该公司被排除在民用政府合同之外。

广告 · 继续向下滚动

杰克·奎因在纽约报道;诺琳·瓦尔德和马修·刘易斯编辑

我们的准则:汤姆森路透社信任原则

US judge blocks Pentagon’s Anthropic blacklisting

2026-08-28T01:27:19.988Z / Reuters

By Jack Queen

August 28, 2026 1:27 AM UTC Updated 1 hour ago

Anthropic logo, a keyboard and a robotic hand in this illustration taken June 5, 2026. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration

  • Anthropic alleges Pentagon chief overstepped his authority Pentagon says national security risk designation is lawful
  • Judge Lin found designation was ‘illegal and baseless’

August 27(Reuters) – A U.S. judge on Thursday blocked the Pentagon’s blacklisting of Anthropic, ​the latest turn in the Claude maker’s high-stakes fight with the military over AI safety on the ​battlefield.

Anthropic’s lawsuit in California federal court alleges that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth overstepped his authority when he designated Anthropic a national security supply-chain risk, a label the government can apply to companies that expose military systems to potential infiltration or sabotage by adversaries.

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Hegseth’s unprecedented move, which blocked ​Anthropic from certain military contracts, followed Anthropic’s refusal to allow the military to use its Claude AI models ​for U.S. surveillance or autonomous weapons. Anthropic executives have said it could cost the company billions of ⁠dollars in lost business and reputational harm.

U.S. District Judge Rita Lin, an appointee of former Democratic President Joe Biden, ​made the ruling in a 59-page order where she found that the Pentagon’s decision was “illegal and baseless.”

“The empty invocation of national ​security is not a blank check to punish and retaliate against government critics,” she wrote.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Anthropic welcomed the ruling and said in a statement that it remained “focused on working productively with the government to harness AI for our national security so all Americans benefit from this technology.”

The ​Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Anthropic argues that AI models are not reliable enough to be ​safely used in autonomous weapons and that it opposes domestic surveillance as a violation of rights, but the Pentagon says private companies ‌should not ⁠be able to constrain military action.

The designation made by the Pentagon was the first time a U.S. company has been publicly designated a supply-chain risk under an obscure government-procurement statute aimed at protecting military systems from foreign sabotage.

In its March 9 lawsuit, Anthropic alleged the government violated its right to free speech under the First Amendment of the Constitution by retaliating ​against its views on AI ​safety. The company said ⁠it was not given a chance to dispute the designation, in violation of its Fifth Amendment right to due process.

blob:https://www.reuters.com/dadf876c-9d69-4161-9b60-98544c623d09

The lawsuit says the decision was unlawful, unsupported by facts and inconsistent ​with the military’s past praise of Claude.

The Justice Department countered that Anthropic’s refusal to ​lift the restrictions ⁠could cause uncertainty in the Pentagon over how it could use Claude and risk disabling military systems during operations, according to a court filing.

The government said the designation stemmed from Anthropic’s refusal to accept contractual terms, not its views on AI safety.

Anthropic has ⁠a second ​lawsuit pending in Washington, D.C., over a separate Pentagon supply-chain risk designation ​that could lead to its exclusion from civilian government contracts.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Reporting by Jack Queen in New York; Editing by Noeleen Walder and Matthew Lewis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2