美国法官叫停特朗普政府对公平住房组织资助的全面改革


2026-08-26 20:31:55 UTC / 路透社

作者:内特·雷蒙德

2026年8月26日 世界协调时20:31 更新于20分钟前

[1/2]2025年3月28日,美国加利福尼亚州欧文市,建筑工人使用木材搭建住宅。路透社/迈克·布莱克

  • 内容概要
  • 住房和城市发展部计划将5600万美元拨款中的4600万美元分配给5个项目
  • 法官指出住房和城市发展部未就拨款项目的全面改革作出合理解释
  • 法官称,改革计划将使长期合作的公平住房组织无法参与该项目

路透社波士顿8月26日电——一名联邦法官周三阻止了唐纳德·特朗普政府重组一项联邦拨款计划的举措,该计划将把资金从100多家此前长期获得资助、用于预防和调查住房歧视的非营利组织转移出去。

美国波士顿地区法官明恩·乔恩裁定,美国住房和城市发展部未就其对该机构运营的、旨在打击住房歧视的一项数十年历史的拨款计划实施“全面改革”的决定作出合理解释。

每日案卷专栏将最新法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱,开启您的晨间资讯。点击此处订阅。

广告 · 滚动继续阅读

此次诉讼由全国公平住房联盟和马萨诸塞州公平住房中心提起,两组织于7月起诉要求叫停此次改革。

原告方律师、赖尔曼·考尔克斯律师事务所的莉拉·米勒在一份声明中表示,这一裁决“恰当地认可了争议的利害关系,维护了法治”。

住房和城市发展部未回应置评请求。

乔恩是民主党总统乔·拜登任命的法官,他表示,长期以来国会一直认为有必要为公平住房组织提供资助,以支持住房和城市发展部的工作,而该部门此前一直通过多年期拨款为这些组织提供资金。

广告 · 滚动继续阅读

但他指出,住房和城市发展部在7月颠覆了这一公平住房法案执行体系,宣布2025财年的国会拨款将不会用于私人执法倡议,也不会用于国会1987年设立的公平住房倡议计划下的多年期拨款。

据公平住房组织的律师介绍,过去住房和城市发展部通常会颁发100多份拨款,金额从7.5万美元到42.5万美元不等。

住房和城市发展部反而计划将国会划拨的5600万美元中的4600万美元用于5个项目,其中2500万美元将流向一所法学院。剩余的1000万美元可用于州或地方机构。

“住房和城市发展部的改革实际上有效地阻断了那些自公平住房倡议计划实施以来年复一年践行该计划使命的住房组织,”乔恩说道。

blob:https://www.reuters.com/b73cafc3-24a5-4262-9923-325209f1cbef

特朗普政府还试图通过附加条款,迫使拨款接受者签署与住房资助无关的条件才能获得资金,要求他们不得使用任何资金支持“性别意识形态”或“非法移民”相关活动。

住房和城市发展部辩称,其有权施加这些条件,并且对拨款计划的改革是一项大规模现代化努力的一部分,旨在扩大参与范围。

但乔恩表示,这种“简洁的描述在形式和实质内容上都远远达不到要求”,而且“很难看出被告在制定这些改革时如何或在何处参考了相关数据”。

广告 · 滚动继续阅读

内特·雷蒙德波士顿报道;奥罗拉·埃利斯编辑

我们的准则:汤森路透信托原则。

US judge blocks Trump overhaul of funding for fair housing groups

2026-08-26 20:31:55 UTC / Reuters

By Nate Raymond

August 26, 2026 8:31 PM UTC Updated 20 mins ago

[1/2]Construction workers use wood and lumber to build residential homes in Irvine, California, U.S., March 28, 2025. REUTERS/Mike Blake

  • Summary
  • HUD planned to direct $46 million of $56 million to five grants
  • Judge says HUD failed to explain sweeping changes to grant program
  • Plan would bar longstanding fair housing groups from program, judge says

BOSTON, Aug 26 (Reuters) – A federal judge on Wednesday blocked President Donald Trump’s administration from ‌restructuring a federal grant program to redirect money away from over 100 non-profit organizations that had historically received funding to help prevent and investigate housing discrimination.

U.S. District Judge Myong Joun in Boston ruled the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development had failed to ​provide a reasoned explanation for its decision to implement “sweeping changes” to a decades-old grant program run ​by the agency designed to combat housing discrimination.

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

His ruling came in a lawsuit by the ⁠National Fair Housing Alliance and the Massachusetts Fair Housing Center, which sued in July to block the ​changes.

Lila Miller, a lawyer for the plaintiffs at the law firm Relman Colfax, in a statement said the ruling “rightfully ​recognizes the stakes at issue and protects the rule of law.”

HUD did not respond to a request for comment.

Joun, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden, said Congress had long recognized the need to provide funding for fair housing organizations to help support ​the work of HUD, which had funded them through multi-year grants.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Yet he said HUD in July upended that ​system of enforcing the Fair Housing Act by announcing it would not allocate any of its congressionally appropriated funding for the ‌2025 fiscal ⁠year to private enforcement initiatives or to multi-year grants issued through the Fair Housing Initiatives Program, which Congress created in 1987.

In the past, HUD would typically award over 100 grants ranging from $75,000 to $425,000, according to lawyers for the fair housing groups.

HUD instead planned to use $46 million of the $56 million that Congress had appropriated for just five grants, $25 million ​of which would go to ​a law school. The ⁠remaining $10 million could go to a state or local agency.

“The effect of HUD’s restructure effectively bars the very housing organizations that have been effectuating FHIP’s mission year after ​year since its enactment,” Joun said.

blob:https://www.reuters.com/b73cafc3-24a5-4262-9923-325209f1cbef

The Trump administration also sought to force grant ​recipients to sign ⁠onto unrelated conditions to receive funding, by imposing requirements that they not use any funding to support “gender ideology” or “illegal immigration.”

HUD had argued it had the discretion to impose those conditions and that the changes it was making to the ⁠grant program ​were part of a large-scale modernization effort designed to broaden participation.

But ​Joun said that the “pithy description falls woefully short of the mark in both form and substance,” and it was “hard to see how or ​where Defendants relied on relevant data in crafting these changes.”

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Aurora Ellis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2