Meta就社交媒体对儿童造成伤害案达成166.8亿美元和解协议


2026年8月26日 13:03 UTC 1小时前更新 / 路透社

作者:戴安娜·诺瓦克·琼斯


第1/3页

2026年5月20日,一名女子走过美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的Meta实验室。路透社/丹尼尔·科尔

[1/3]一名女子走过美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的Meta实验室。路透社/丹尼尔·科尔 购买授权许可,将在新标签页打开

  • 概要
  • 公司
  • Meta将在全美范围内实施青少年使用保护措施,包括每日使用时长限制和夜间使用屏蔽
  • 此次和解避免了29个州提起诉讼引发的加利福尼亚联邦庭审
  • Meta否认在和解过程中存在不当行为

8月26日(路透社)——Meta平台公司(股票代码:META.O)同意支付最高166.8亿美元,并对Facebook和Instagram进行重大调整,以解决美国多个州提出的指控:该公司刻意设计平台以诱导儿童成瘾、误导消费者关于平台安全性、以及不当收集儿童个人数据。

此次和解解决了29个美国州提起的诉讼,并将终结一场联邦庭审——这场庭审是社交媒体公司损害青少年用户指控迄今最受关注的庭审之一。

路透社每日简报通讯为您提供开启一天所需的全部新闻。点击此处订阅。

广告 · 继续向下滚动

Meta将对使用Facebook和Instagram的儿童设置每日使用时长限制,并限制其夜间使用,同时加强措施防止儿童访问年龄限制内容。

这家总部位于加利福尼亚州门洛帕克的公司在同意和解后否认存在不当行为。

周三达成的和解还解决了加利福尼亚州、伊利诺伊州、新墨西哥州和华盛顿特区就剑桥分析丑闻相关隐私索赔提起的诉讼。在该丑闻中,这家咨询公司收集了数百万Facebook用户的个人数据。这些州将获得4.593亿美元以解决相关诉讼。

Meta股价在早盘交易中上涨2.3%。

广告 · 继续向下滚动

这些诉讼是州政府、地方政府、学区和个人提起的更广泛诉讼浪潮的一部分,他们指控Meta和其他社交媒体公司加剧了全国性的青少年心理健康危机。

加利福尼亚州奥克兰联邦法院的庭审涵盖了加利福尼亚州、科罗拉多州、肯塔基州和新泽西州的指控,即Meta违反了其州消费者保护法。

庭审还涵盖了29个州的指控,即Meta违反了联邦《儿童在线隐私保护法》,在未获得父母通知或同意的情况下,从其明知是儿童的用户处收集个人数据,并利用这些数据训练机器学习和生成式人工智能模型。

Meta长期以来一直辩称,其不可能误导消费者其服务是否会成瘾,因为“社交媒体成瘾”并非公认的精神疾病。

blob:https://www.reuters.com/3a7d78fd-d539-47f6-8381-9eea90019de2

在8月18日庭审开始前,Meta表示加利福尼亚州、科罗拉多州、肯塔基州和新泽西州寻求最高1.4万亿美元的罚款。这些州则表示,罚款金额将接近2000亿美元。

心理健康危机

Meta、Snapchat及其母公司Snap(股票代码:SNAP.N)、YouTube及其母公司Alphabet(股票代码:GOOGL.O)以及TikTok及其母公司字节跳动,仍面临联邦和州法院数千起诉讼,指控它们刻意设计平台成瘾功能,诱导儿童和青少年成瘾,加剧心理健康危机。田纳西州对Meta提起的诉讼庭审于上月在纳什维尔开庭。

联邦案件已由奥克兰的美国地区法官伊冯娜·冈萨雷斯·罗杰斯合并审理,其中包括个人、学区和州政府提起的诉讼。

广告 · 继续向下滚动

今年早些时候,Meta在新墨西哥州提起的标志性诉讼的两个阶段均败诉。今年3月,陪审团认定Meta误导消费者关于其平台的安全性,责令其支付3.75亿美元。8月6日,一名法官认定Meta造成了公共妨害,责令其额外支付5.67亿美元并实施青少年安全措施。

同样在今年3月,针对Meta和谷歌的个人诉讼的首次庭审以原告胜诉告终。洛杉矶陪审团认定两家公司应对原告凯莉·G.M.的抑郁和焦虑负责,责令二者合计支付600万美元赔偿金。

两家公司均表示将对这些判决提起上诉。

戴安娜·诺瓦克·琼斯报道,亚历克西亚·加拉姆法尔维、杰米·弗里德和马克·波特编辑

我们的标准:汤森路透信托原则。

Meta reaches $16.68 billion settlement over social media harms to children

August 26, 2026 1:03 PM UTC Updated 1 hour ago / Reuters

By Diana Novak Jones

Item 1 of 3 A woman walks by the Meta Lab in Los Angeles, California, U.S., May 20, 2026. REUTERS/Daniel Cole

[1/3]A woman walks by the Meta Lab in Los Angeles, California, U.S., May 20, 2026. REUTERS/Daniel Cole Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

  • Summary
  • Companies
  • Meta agrees to teenage safeguards including daily usage limits and nighttime blocks nationwide
  • Settlement averts California federal trial over claims from 29 states
  • Meta denies wrongdoing in settling claims

Aug 26 (Reuters) – Meta Platforms META.O agreed to pay a maximum $16.68 billion and make major changes ​to Facebook and Instagram to resolve claims by states across the U.S. that the company designed those platforms to addict children, ‌misled consumers about their safety and improperly collected children’s personal data.

The settlement resolves claims brought by 29 U.S. states, and will end a federal trial that had been one of the highest-profile tests yet of allegations that social media companies harmed young users.

The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Meta will impose daily usage limits and restrict nighttime usage by children ​who use Facebook and Instagram, and enhance measures to prevent children from accessing age-restricted content.

The Menlo Park, California-based company denied ​wrongdoing in agreeing to settle.

Wednesday’s settlement also resolves lawsuits by California, Illinois, New Mexico and Washington, D.C., over ⁠privacy claims related to the Cambridge Analytica scandal, where the consulting firm collected personal data of millions of Facebook users. Those states ​will receive $459.3 million to resolve those lawsuits.

Shares of Meta rose 2.3% in early trading.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

The claims were part of a broader wave of litigation brought ​by states, local governments, school districts and individuals alleging that Meta and other social media companies fueled a nationwide youth mental health crisis.

The trial in the Oakland, California, federal court covered claims from California, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey that Meta violated their state laws protecting consumers.

It also covered claims from 29 ​states that Meta violated the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act by collecting personal data from users it knew were children without parental ​notification or consent, and using the data to train machine learning and generative AI models.

Meta has long argued it could not have misled consumers about whether ‌its services ⁠were addictive because “social media addiction” is not a recognized psychiatric condition.

blob:https://www.reuters.com/3a7d78fd-d539-47f6-8381-9eea90019de2

Before the trial began on August 18, Meta said California, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey were seeking up to $1.4 trillion in penalties. The states suggested that the figure would be closer to $200 billion.

A MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS

Meta, Snapchat and its parent Snap SNAP.N, YouTube and its parent Alphabet GOOGL.O, and TikTok and its parent ByteDance still face thousands of lawsuits in federal and state ​courts over claims they knowingly designed ​their platforms to have features ⁠that addict children and teenagers, fueling a mental health crisis. A trial in Nashville over claims brought by Tennessee against Meta began last month.

The federal cases were consolidated before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ​in Oakland, and include lawsuits brought by individuals, school districts and state governments.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Earlier this year, Meta lost ​both phases of a ⁠landmark lawsuit brought by New Mexico. A jury in March ordered it to pay $375 million after finding it had misled consumers about the safety of its platforms. On August 6, a judge found Meta had created a public nuisance and ordered it to pay an additional $567 million and implement youth-safety ⁠measures.

Also in ​March, the first trial over an individual’s claims against Meta and Google ended ​with a verdict in the plaintiff’s favor. A Los Angeles jury found the companies liable for plaintiff Kaley G.M.’s depression and anxiety and ordered them to pay a combined $6 million ​in damages.

The companies have said they will appeal those verdicts.

Reporting by Diana Novak Jones, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi, Jamie Freed and Mark Porter

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2