2026-08-21T13:49:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻（CBS News）
作者：迈克尔·休格曼、伊莎贝尔·塔布斯
更新时间：2026年8月21日 / 美国东部时间下午3:15 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻（CBS News）
一名女子发现自己被一名佩戴Meta人工智能智能眼镜的男子秘密拍摄，这一情况是在多年未联系的朋友和陌生人给她发来社交媒体上的一段视频后才被发现的。
“这段视频走红了。在所有平台上的播放量可能超过20万次，”托卢瓦·奥米托沃朱说道。
这一现象正呈上升趋势：内容创作者越来越多地使用可穿戴人工智能技术，在未经当事人同意的情况下，录制普通人的日常画面用于搭讪恶作剧视频。
奥米托沃朱看到自己出现在这类视频中时感到震惊和不悦，该视频目前已被下架。她完全不知道自己被拍摄了，视频发布前也没有人征求过她的同意。
“我毫无话语权，”奥米托沃朱说道，她补充说还有其他女性也曾向她分享过类似的经历。
“情况还要糟糕得多。糟糕到他们甚至不知道是谁拍摄了他们，视频却通过匿名账号被发布到了网上，”她说。
Meta旗下社交媒体巨头Instagram的负责人亚当·莫塞里表示，该平台正在打击骚扰他人或侵犯他人隐私的视频。
“如果你发布的内容是在利用他人并对其进行骚扰，就像我们近期听说和看到的大量搭讪类视频那样，我们会将该内容下架，”他在7月说道。“我们不希望有人偷偷拍摄他人、骚扰他们，然后将视频发布到我们的平台上。”
Meta此前曾因隐私问题受到抨击。
今年5月，得克萨斯州总检察长肯·帕克斯顿对雷朋Meta眼镜展开调查，称该眼镜可能会通过摄像头、扬声器等设备秘密拍摄他人，包括在如厕等私人场合，从而侵犯个人隐私。
“隐私与数据保护是我们在Meta打造每一款产品的核心原则，包括雷朋Meta眼镜，”Meta当时在一份声明中说道。
Meta在接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻采访时表示，其智能眼镜内置隐私与安全功能，包括在眼镜开始录制时会亮起的显眼LED指示灯，以及在指示灯被遮挡或关闭时可阻止录制的软件。
哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的安娜·谢克特对这一功能进行了测试。她发现，在已经开始录制后再遮挡指示灯，禁用机制似乎无法正常工作。
Meta的一位发言人在接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻采访时表示，防篡改功能的设计初衷是在按下录制键前，如果检测到拍摄LED指示灯被遮挡，就会禁用录制功能。
“如果眼镜检测到拍摄LED指示灯被遮挡或阻挡，就会禁用拍摄功能，并提示佩戴者清除遮挡物，”该公司在给哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的一份声明中说道。
Meta补充说，他们将继续“努力改进这项技术”。
另一个隐私方面的复杂问题是，美国大多数州只要求互动记录过程中有一方同意即可，这意味着只有拍摄者本人需要知晓拍摄行为。
奥米托沃朱表示，她认为可穿戴技术对个人隐私构成了巨大威胁。
“如果有人看到有人将手机对着自己，他们还有机会走开，或是上前说‘嘿，我不想让你拍摄’。但有了这些智能眼镜和智能技术，人们就被剥夺了拒绝拍摄的权利，”她说。
Woman covertly filmed by Meta AI smart glasses raises privacy and consent concerns: “I had no say”
2026-08-21T13:49:00-0400 / CBS News
By Michael Sugerman, Isabel Tabs
Updated on: August 21, 2026 / 3:15 PM EDT / CBS News
A woman discovered she had been secretly filmed by a man wearing Meta’s AI-powered smart glasses when friends and people she hadn’t talked to in years sent her a video posted on social media.
“It went viral. Across all platforms, probably over 200,000 views,” Toluwa Omitowoju said.
It’s a growing trend with content creators increasingly using wearable AI tech to record everyday people in prank pickup line videos – often without their consent.
Omitowoju was shocked and displeased to see herself in one such video, which has since been taken down.She had no idea she was being filmed, nor was she asked before the video was posted.
“I had no say,” Omitowoju said, adding that other women have shared similar experiences with her.
“It was a lot worse. It was to the point where they don’t even know who filmed them and yet it’s being posted online under a burner account,” she said.
Adam Mosseri, the head of Meta-owned social media giant Instagram, said the platform is cracking down on videos that harass people or invade their privacy.
“If you’re posting content that is taking advantage of people and harassing them, like a lot of these pickup line kind of videos that we’ve heard of and seen recently, then we’re going to take the content down,” he said in July. “We don’t want people to be surreptitiously taking videos of other people and harassing them and then posting them on our platform.”
Meta has come under fire for privacy concerns before.
In May, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton launched an investigation into Ray-Ban Meta glasses, alleging that the glasses could violate personal privacy by using cameras, speakers and more to covertly film people, including in private moments such as bathroom visits.
“Privacy and data protection are core to every product we build at Meta, including Ray-Ban Meta glasses,” Meta said in a statement at the time.
Meta told CBS News that its glasses have built-in privacy and safety features, including a telltale LED light that turns on when the glasses are recording and software that is supposed to prevent recording if the light is covered or disabled.
CBS News’ Anna Schecter put this feature to the test. She found the disabling mechanism did not appear to work when she covered the light after already starting to record.
A Meta spokesperson told CBS News the tamper detection is designed to prevent recording if the light is covered before pressing record.
“If the glasses detect that the capture LED is covered or obstructed, they will disable capture and prompt the wearer to clear the obstruction,” the company said in a statement to CBS News.
Meta added it continues to “work to improve this technology.”
Another privacy complication is that most states only require the consent of one person to record an interaction, which means only the person recording has to know.
Omitowoju said she believes that wearable technology is a huge threat to personal privacy.
“If someone sees a phone in front of their face, they have the opportunity to step away, to approach someone and say, ‘Hey, I don’t want you to record.’ With these smart glasses and the smart technology, you’re taking away the right of refusal,” she said.
发表回复