澳大利亚人艾琳·帕特森就毒蘑菇案三项谋杀罪名提起上诉


2026年8月19日 / 哥伦比亚广播公司/美联社

被定罪的澳大利亚三重谋杀犯艾琳·帕特森周三对其定罪提起上诉,她被指控用死亡帽蘑菇毒杀了分居丈夫的四名亲属。

维多利亚州上诉法院的三名法官将用两天时间审理她的上诉,涉及2023年7月她在澳大利亚东南部利奥加塔乡村家中制作的牛肉惠灵顿酥皮点心午餐案,她因此被判三项谋杀罪和一项谋杀未遂罪。

去年7月,经过一场牵动全澳大利亚的九周审判,帕特森被判定有罪。

与此同时,检方正在就她的刑期提起上诉,认为判决过于宽大。这位51岁的女子于去年9月被判处终身监禁,必须至少服刑33年才能申请假释。

![Convicted killer Erin Patterson leaves the Supreme Court of Victoria in Melbourne on Sept. 8, 2025. WILLIAM WEST/AFP via Getty Images]

检方检察官布伦丹·基萨内表示,检方将在周四的庭审中主张,应判处帕特森终身监禁且不得假释。

帕特森的辩护律师理查德·埃德尼周三提出上诉的第一项理由是,陪审团成员被安排与一名警方证人及检方团队成员同住一家酒店,这一失误违反了陪审团隔离规定。
“这是非常严重的隔离规定违反行为,”埃德尼在法庭上表示,称其为“灾难性的”。

基萨内表示,没有证据支持这一主张,并告诉法庭:“没有任何陪审员与其他人发生实际接触。”

辩方法律团队的另一名成员维罗妮卡·德拉戈表示,没有证据表明帕特森读过网上帖子,这些帖子称在洛赫和奥特里姆镇附近发现了死亡帽蘑菇。

庭审中听取了一名电信专家的证词,称帕特森的手机曾连接到奥特里姆和洛赫附近的信号塔。

德拉戈表示,该证据仅能表明帕特森的手机可能曾出现在该区域。
“在我们看来,仅此一点就足以说明该证据是多么危险和不公平,”德拉戈说道。

检方律师杰里米·麦克威廉姆斯表示,证据表明帕特森在为分居丈夫的家人准备午餐前不久,有机会故意获取死亡帽蘑菇。

据法新社报道,死亡帽蘑菇(或称毒鹅膏)是世界上毒性最强的蘑菇,约占真菌相关死亡病例的90%。
人们很容易将这种棕白相间的蘑菇与其他蘑菇混淆,据称烹饪后味道鲜美。

“压迫性”盘问

辩方上诉的另一项理由是,检察官纳内特·罗杰斯对帕特森进行了五天的盘问,这“不公平且具有压迫性”。

辩方团队还主张,审判法官克里斯托弗·贝尔允许将帕特森脸书联系人的证据纳入庭审,造成了“不公平的偏见”。

帕特森的分居丈夫西蒙·帕特森受邀参加了这场致命的午餐,但并未出席。他的父母唐·帕特森和盖尔·帕特森,以及盖尔的姐姐希瑟·威尔金森均已死亡。希瑟的丈夫伊恩·威尔金森在医院住了数周后幸存。

帕特森在庭审中辩称,此次投毒是意外事故。

德拉戈辩称,检方在开场陈述时称没有证据表明投毒存在动机,却在结案陈词中暗示帕特森对丈夫的父母及更广泛的帕特森家族怀有敌意,将此作为动机,这导致了司法不公。

在三名法官之一的莱斯利·泰勒法官的提问下,德拉戈表示她并非在指控检方存在故意的职业不当行为。
“这当然不是直接的指控或暗示,但根据我们对所有材料的解读,很明显检方的案件从开始到结束发生了变化,”德拉戈说道。

如果帕特森的上诉成功,法官们可以推翻她的定罪并下令重审。

帕特森周三并未出庭,而是在监狱中通过视频观看了庭审。

在庭审后才公开的预审证词中,西蒙·帕特森表示他怀疑妻子故意用她准备的食物让自己重病。但始终未检出任何毒药。

艾琳·帕特森最初于2021年11月至2022年9月期间被指控三项谋杀未遂罪,罪名均针对其丈夫。她否认了所有指控。检方在2025年4月庭审开始前撤销了所有针对其丈夫的指控。

Australian Erin Patterson appeals 3 murder convictions in poison mushroom case

August 19, 2026 / CBS/AP

Convicted Australian triple-murderer Erin Patterson appealed her convictions Wednesday for poisoning four of her estranged husband’s relatives with death cap mushrooms.

Three judges of the Victoria state Court of Appeal are hearing her appeal over two days against her convictions on three counts of murder and one of attempted murder relating to a lunch of beef Wellington pastries she prepared at her rural home in Leongatha, in southeast Australia, in July 2023.

Last July, Patterson was found guilty of the murders after a nine-week trial that gripped Australia.

Prosecutors, meanwhile, are appealing her sentence, which they argue was too lenient. The 51-year-old was sentenced in September last year to life in prison, and she must serve at least 33 years behind bars before she can apply for release on parole.

Convicted killer Erin Patterson leaves the Supreme Court of Victoria in Melbourne on Sept. 8, 2025. WILLIAM WEST/AFP via Getty Images

Prosecutors will argue at the hearing Thursday that she should be sentenced to life without the possibility of parole, prosecutor Brendan Kissane said.

Patterson’s defense attorney Richard Edney made the first ground for their appeal on Wednesday an error that resulted in jury members being sequestered in the same hotel as a police witness and members of the prosecution team.

“This was a very serious breach of sequestration,” Edney told the court, calling it “catastrophic.”

Kissane said there was no evidence to support that argument, telling the court “there was no actual contact between any juror and any other person.”

Another member of the defense legal team, Veronika Drago, said there was no evidence that Patterson had read online posts that reported death cap mushrooms had been seen near the towns of Loch and Outtrim.

The trial heard evidence from a telecommunications expert that Patterson’s phone connected to towers near Outtrim and Loch.

Drago said the evidence showed only that Patterson’s phone may have been in the area.

“That in and of itself, in our submission, illustrates just how dangerous and unfair that evidence was,” Drago said.

Prosecutor Jeremy McWilliams said the evidence showed Patterson had an opportunity to deliberately source death cap mushrooms shortly before preparing the lunch for her estranged husband’s family.

Death caps — or amanita phalloides — are the deadliest mushrooms in the world, causing some 90% of fungus-related fatalities, according to the AFP news agency.

It’s easy to mistake the brown-and-white mushrooms for others, and they’re said to have a pleasant taste when cooked.

“Oppressive” cross-examination

Another ground for the defense’s appeal was that prosecutor Nanette Rogers’ cross-examination of Patterson over five days was “unfair and oppressive.”

The defense team also argued that trial judge Christopher Bale had caused “unfair prejudice” by allowing evidence from Patterson’s Facebook contacts into the trial.

Patterson’s estranged husband, Simon Patterson, was invited to the fatal lunch but did not attend. His parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail’s sister, Heather Wilkinson, died. Heather’s husband Ian Wilkinson spent weeks in a hospital, but survived.

Patterson argued during her trial that the poisoning was an accident.

Drago argued a miscarriage of justice occurred when the prosecution opened its case saying there was no evidence of a motive for the poisonings, then closed the case suggesting Patterson had animosity toward her husband’s parents and the broader Patterson family, as a motive.

Questioned by one of the three judges, Justice Lesley Taylor, Drago said she was not accusing prosecutors of deliberate professional misconduct.

“It is certainly not a direct allegation or suggestion of that, but what is clear in our submission from the reading of all of the material is that where things started and where it finished by the end of the prosecution case were different,” Drago said.

If Patterson’s appeal succeeds, the judges could overturn her convictions and order a retrial.

Patterson did not attend court on Wednesday and watched the hearing by video from prison.

In pretrial testimony that was only made public after her trial, Simon Patterson said he suspected his wife had deliberately made him seriously ill with food she prepared. No poisons were ever found.

Erin Patterson was initially charged with three counts of attempting to murder him three times between November 2021 and September 2022. She had denied all charges. Prosecutors dropped all charges relating to the husband before her trial began in April 2025.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2