曼焦内联邦案件认罪是否会危及他的州级谋杀审判?


2026-08-14T13:49:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻(CBS News)
作者:马克·奥斯本
更新于:2026年8月14日 / 美国东部时间下午2:56 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

路易吉·曼焦内上周五在与近两起枪杀一名医疗高管致死案相关的联邦案件中认罪,这引发了人们对他的州级谋杀审判将如何进展的疑问,该审判原定仅三周后开庭。

曼焦内承认于2024年12月杀害了联合健康集团(UnitedHealthcare)首席执行官布莱恩·汤普森。他对两项联邦指控认罪:跨州跟踪致人死亡罪以及通过跨州设施实施跟踪致人死亡罪。两项罪名的最高刑期均为终身监禁,曼焦内在法庭上承认他已知晓这一点。

法官已将 sentencing 定在12月18日。

与此同时,曼焦内还面临州级二级谋杀罪以及武器和伪造罪指控。一级谋杀指控已于2025年9月被驳回。

他的辩护团队由知名律师卡伦·弗里德曼·阿尼菲洛领衔,此前多次辩称州级审判构成双重审判。如今他已对联邦指控认罪,辩护方可能会更积极地推进这一主张。

“尽管这只是一起孤立的单一事件,但曼焦内先生从一开始就遭到了不公正对待,他成功驳回了恐怖主义指控和死刑判决,同时还要应对两个司法辖区的同步起诉,因完全相同的行为被两次追责,”阿尼菲洛在认罪听证会结束后在法庭外对记者表示。

阿尼菲洛表示,他们已在州法院提交申请,以双重审判为由驳回相关指控。

以下是曼焦内认罪协议达成后尚存的几个关键问题。

什么是双重审判?它将如何适用于路易吉·曼焦内的案件?

双重审判是美国宪法第五修正案中的一项条款,规定个人不得因同一罪行被两次起诉。

曼焦内在纽约州面临所有指控——他还在被捕地宾夕法尼亚州面临武器指控——均源于对汤普森的枪击案。汤普森是两个孩子的父亲,在曼哈顿人行道上前往公司投资者会议途中遭枪杀。不过,具体的州级指控有所不同。

路易吉·曼焦内2026年8月11日在曼哈顿最高法院与其中一名律师交谈。巴里·威廉姆斯/路透社泳池照片

“根据纽约州有关连续起诉的法律,也就是所谓的双重审判法,不允许一个人因完全相同的罪行被起诉和处罚两次,”阿尼菲洛说道。

但负责州级案件起诉的曼哈顿地区检察官阿尔文·布拉格的发言人表示,其办公室计划继续推进工作,并在法庭上对抗任何质疑。

“自2024年12月以来,曼哈顿地区检察官办公室一直在不懈准备,力争在纽约州最高法院对这起据称冷血杀害布莱恩·汤普森的案件获得定罪,”该发言人在一份声明中表示。“我们很高兴汤普森的家人今天获得了一定程度的追责。尽管联邦 sentencing 仍在待决,但我们已准备好就辩方动议进行诉讼。曼哈顿地区检察官办公室仍致力于为汤普森先生及其家人寻求正义。”

无论法院最终作出何种裁决,州级审判似乎很可能会被推迟。

“值得注意的是,从一开始,州和联邦检察官之间就一直在暗中较劲,首先是关于谁将率先开庭审理,”哥伦比亚广播公司新闻法律记者卡特里娜·考夫曼说道。“联邦检察官曾试图率先开庭,但州级法官明确表示,他认为纽约州在此案中做了所有前期工作。”

纽约州的双重审判规则是否有所不同?

案件发生在纽约州这一事实确实会改变情况。哥伦比亚广播公司新闻特约撰稿人、洛杉矶洛约拉法学院教授杰西卡·莱文森表示,纽约州的法律比第五修正案的双重审判条款对被告更为宽松。

莱文森称,纽约州法律规定,不得因同一行为和同一事实进行连续起诉。

“辩方将辩称,联邦跟踪指控与州级谋杀指控基于同一套行为和同一套事实,”莱文森说道。“检方则会反驳称:‘但州级法律存在例外条款。’这些例外涉及犯罪构成要件不同的情况,比如联邦跟踪罪的构成要件与州级谋杀罪的构成要件存在实质性差异。”

阿尼菲洛在周五听证会结束后对记者表示,曼焦内的辩护团队确实会在案件中提出双重审判的抗辩理由。

“他受到的待遇与纽约州其他被控此类罪行的被告都不同,”她说。“不过值得庆幸的是,纽约州法律不允许这种情况发生。”

2026年8月14日,路易吉·曼焦内的辩护团队(左起:雅各布·卡普兰、马克·阿尼菲洛和卡伦·弗里德曼·阿尼菲洛)在曼焦内承认杀害联合健康集团首席执行官布莱恩·汤普森后,离开曼哈顿联邦法院。蒂莫西·A·克莱里/法新社 via 盖蒂图片社

双重审判是否适用于路易吉·曼焦内的案件?

将由负责州级案件的纽约州最高法院法官格雷戈里·卡罗决定纽约州的双重审判条款是否适用于曼焦内的州级审判。

曼焦内的辩护团队表示,他们已在一份法庭文件中提出了这一抗辩理由。

“今天的认罪触发了双重审判法,我们刚刚在州法院提交了动议,解释为何根据纽约州的双重审判保护条款,州级指控必须被驳回,”阿尼菲洛在周五说道。

此外,还需要确定曼焦内周五在公开法庭上承认杀害汤普森的供述是否可以在州级审判中被采纳,莱文森表示。

“我认为辩方在此次认罪交易中可能争取到了两个结果,”莱文森说道。“其一,承担责任,希望这能成为法官量刑时的从轻情节。其二……希望在公开场合承认‘我认罪’这一行为,在法律层面上等同于起诉。”

“他希望根据禁止连续起诉的纽约州法律,法官能够驳回对他的谋杀指控,”莱文森补充道。“我认为这对他来说是一个很难成立的论点。”

律师兼法律分析师乔·坦布林诺告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,他认为曼焦内的联邦认罪不应排除州级审判。

“纽约州的法律旨在预防故意谋杀,而联邦政府则旨在防止跟踪或跨州跟踪受害者并导致其死亡。因此我们面临的是两种不同类型的指控,构成要件也不同,”坦布林诺说道。“这些指控旨在防范不同类型的伤害。所以我不认为双重审判会阻止纽约州继续进行起诉。”

汤普森的家人在认罪后发表的一份声明中似乎表示,他们希望看到州级审判继续进行。

“我们深知纽约州和宾夕法尼亚州仍有额外的诉讼程序要进行,我们将继续为布莱恩应得的正义而努力,”他们说道。

Does Mangione’s guilty plea in federal case jeopardize his state murder trial?

2026-08-14T13:49:00-0400 / CBS News

By Mark Osborne

Updated on: August 14, 2026 / 2:56 PM EDT / CBS News

Luigi Mangione’s guilty plea on Friday in the federal case tied to the shooting death of a healthcare executive nearly two years ago is now generating questions about what will happen with his state murder trial, scheduled to get underway in just three weeks.

Mangione admitted Friday to killing UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December 2024. He pleaded guilty to federal charges of interstate stalking resulting in death and stalking through use of interstate facilities resulting in death. Both carry a maximum potential sentence of life in prison, which Mangione acknowledged in court he understood.

The judge scheduled sentencing for Dec. 18.

Meanwhile, Mangione is also facing state charges of second-degree murder and weapons and forgery charges. A first-degree murder charge was tossed out in September 2025.

His lawyers, led by high-profile attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo, have repeatedly argued the state trial amounted to double jeopardy. It’s a claim they will likely pursue even more aggressively now that he’s pleaded to the federal charges.

“Despite this being a single, isolated event, Mr. Mangione has been unfairly treated since the outset in every way and has successfully fought off terrorism charges and the death penalty, while also fighting at the same time two simultaneous prosecutions in two jurisdictions who are trying to punish him twice for the exact conduct,” Agnifilo told reporters outside court after the plea hearing.

Agnifilo said they have filed in state court to dismiss those charges based on the double jeopardy claim.

Here are some of the biggest questions remaining in the wake of Mangione’s plea deal.

What is double jeopardy and how would it apply to Luigi Mangione?

Double jeopardy is a clause in the Fifth Amendment that says individuals cannot be prosecuted twice for the same crime.

All of Mangione’s crimes in New York — he is also facing weapons charges in Pennsylvania, where he was arrested — stem from the shooting of Thompson, a father of two who was gunned down on a Manhattan sidewalk as he headed to a company investors conference. The specific state charges, however, are different.

Luigi Mangione talks to one of his lawyers in Manhattan Supreme Court on Aug. 11, 2026. Barry Williams/Pool via REUTERS

“New York law does not permit a person to be prosecuted and punished twice for the exact same crime under a statute that covers successive prosecutions, it’s also known as the double jeopardy law,” Agnifilo said.

But a spokesperson for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who is prosecuting the state case, said his office plans to continue its work and fight any challenges in court.

“Since December 2024, the Manhattan D.A.’s Office has been tirelessly preparing to pursue a trial conviction in New York State Supreme Court for the alleged cold-blooded murder of Brian Thompson,” the spokesperson said in a statement. “We are encouraged that Mr. Thompson’s family received a measure of accountability today. While federal sentencing is pending, we are prepared to litigate the defense motions. The Manhattan D.A.’s Office remains committed to seeking justice for Mr. Thompson and his family.”

Regardless of what is eventually decided in the courts, it seems likely the state trial will be delayed.

“It is significant to note that since the beginning, there has been this jockeying between the state and federal prosecutors, first, about who would go first at trial,” said CBS News legal reporter Katrina Kaufman. “Federal prosecutors tried to go first, but the state judge said emphatically that he felt New York did all the work here.”

Is double jeopardy different in New York?

The fact that the case took place in New York does change the equation. New York has a state law that is more generous to defendants than the Fifth Amendment double jeopardy clause, according to Jessica Levinson, a CBS News contributor and professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles.

The New York state law says you can’t have successive prosecutions for the same course of conduct and the same acts, Levinson said.

“The defense is going to argue that the federal stalking charges and the state murder charges are based on the same set of conduct and the same set of facts,” Levinson said. “The prosecution is going to say, ‘But wait, there’s a carve-out in state law.’ And those exceptions deal with situations where the elements of the crimes, the elements of federal stalking versus the elements of the state murder charge, are substantially different.”

Agnifilo confirmed Mangione’s legal team would pursue the double jeopardy argument in talking to reporters after Friday’s hearing.

“He’s been treated differently from every other defendant charged with this offense in New York,” she said. “However, thankfully, New York law does not allow this.”

Luigi Mangione’s attorneys (L-R) Jacob Kaplan, Marc Agnifilo and Karen Friedman Agnifilo depart federal court in Manhattan after Mangione pleaded guilty to the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, Aug. 14, 2026. Timothy A. Clary/AFP via Getty Images

Does double jeopardy apply to Luigi Mangione’s case?

It will be up to New York State Supreme Court Justice Gregory Carro, who is presiding over the state case, to decide whether New York’s double jeopardy clause applies to Mangione’s state trial.

Mangione’s defense team said it has already moved to make that argument in a court filing.

“Today’s guilty plea triggers the double jeopardy statute, and we just filed our motion in state court explaining why the state charges must be dismissed under New York’s double jeopardy protections,” Agnifilo said Friday.

In addition, it will have to be decided if Mangione’s admission to killing Thompson in open court Friday could be introduced in the state trial, Levinson said.

“I think what the defense believed they could get in exchange for this guilty plea is potentially two things,” Levinson said. “One of them being accepting responsibility and hoping that serves as a mitigating factor when the judge does give a sentence. The other … is the hope that in deciding to say, ‘I’m pleading guilty,’ that includes a prosecution in the legal sense.”

“What he’s hoping is that under New York law, which prohibits successive prosecutions, that means that a judge will dismiss the murder charge against him,” Levinson continued. “I think that’s a difficult argument for him to make.”

Joe Tamburino, an attorney and legal analyst, told CBS News he agreed Mangione’s federal plea should not exclude a state trial.

“New York’s law is trying to prevent intentional murders, whereas the federal government is trying to prevent stalking or crossing state lines to stalk a victim, and the victim dies. So we have two different types of charges with different elements,” Tamburino said. “And those charges are designed to prevent different types of harm. So I don’t think double jeopardy would prevent New York state from continuing with their prosecution.”

Thompson’s family, in a statement after the guilty plea, seemed to indicate they wish to see a state trial.

“We remain mindful that additional proceedings in New York and Pennsylvania are still to come, and we will continue to seek the justice Brian deserves,” they said.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2