2026-08-11T18:21:47.613Z / 美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）
作者：德文·科尔
发布时间：2026年8月11日，美国东部时间下午2:21
美国总统唐纳德·特朗普（左）与美国商务部长霍华德·卢特尼克于8月6日周四在华盛顿特区白宫椭圆形办公室签署行政令。
亚伦·施瓦茨/CNP/彭博社/盖蒂图片社
唐纳德·特朗普总统遏制出生公民权的最新举措在法庭上再次遭遇质疑，此前曾成功阻止特朗普终结该权利诉求的移民团体，正请求一名联邦法官阻止总统的这一新尝试。
美国最高法院于6月作出裁决，认定特朗普去年连任后发布的一项行政令违宪，因为该命令直接违背了宪法对几乎所有在美国本土出生婴儿的公民权保障。
针对这一裁决，特朗普于上周签署了一项新的行政令，该命令似乎在现有法律基础上进一步收紧了规定，并缩小了公认的例外情形。除其他条款外，该行政令规定，若父母一方为“敌方外国人”、“外国政府雇员”或参与所谓的“生育旅游”，联邦机构将不承认其子女的公民身份。
美国公民自由联盟（ACLU）及其他民权团体的律师周二在新罕布什尔州的一名联邦法官面前表示，新行政令“试图剥夺他们所代表的群体的出生公民权”，“尽管最高法院最近已作出相关裁决”。
“为避免在此问题上产生任何疑问，本院应当明确，政府不得通过任何行政令或其他以行政权力凌驾于出生公民权之上的不当主张，剥夺涉案群体的公民身份，”律师们写道。
这些团体向美国地区法官约瑟夫·拉普兰特提出的诉求，是对这项新行政令的首次直接挑战。在另一桩案件中，此前曾挑战特朗普2025年行政令的律师们已请求马里兰州的一名法官评估，特朗普的新举措是否会非法拒绝其客户的公民身份。
拉普兰特是前总统乔治·W·布什的任命官员，他于去年7月裁定特朗普的第一项行政令违宪，并禁止官员对任何可能受其影响的人执行该命令。该案随后被上诉至最高法院，最高法院维持了他的裁决。
长期以来，最高法院对“凡在美国出生即享有公民权”的规则存在一些公认例外，并在今年夏季的重磅裁决中再次确认了这一点。但这些例外仅限于外交使团人员子女以及“敌对占领期间”出生的“敌方人员”子女。
https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/11/politics/civil-rights-groups-challenge-trumps-new-birthright-citizenship-order
律师：“它站不住脚”：最高法院驳回后特朗普再次瞄准出生公民权
时长：1分57秒
在周二提交给拉普兰特的法庭文件中，美国公民自由联盟表示，特朗普扩大例外情形的尝试明显违法。
“最高法院早已明确，公民权条款的例外情形源自该条款以及法院——而非总统，”他们在提及宪法第十四修正案中有关公民权的条款时写道。
在马里兰州的案件中，代表移民挑战特朗普第一项行政令的律师们向法院表示，司法部告知他们，新举措“仅具有前瞻性效力，在发布指导意见之前不会生效”。律师们在提交的文件中称，司法部未提供有关上周这项行政令的其他信息。
美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）已就此事联系司法部征求评论。
CNN的普里西拉·阿尔瓦雷斯和约翰·弗里策为本报道贡献了内容。
https://www.cnn.com/audio/podcasts/cnn-this-morning/episodes/c149d9b4-b53c-11f0-aeee-ab62e9ecf5fd
Civil rights groups ask judge to block Trump’s new birthright citizenship order
2026-08-11T18:21:47.613Z / CNN
By Devan Cole
PUBLISHED Aug 11, 2026, 2:21 PM ET
US President Donald Trump, left, and Howard Lutnick, US commerce secretary, during an executive order signing in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, August 6.
Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg/Getty Images
President Donald Trump’s latest effort to curb birthright citizenship is facing fresh skepticism in court, with immigrants who successfully fought his earlier bid to end the right asking a federal judge to stop the president’s new gambit.
The Supreme Court ruled in June that an executive order Trump issued after returning to office last year was unconstitutional because it directly conflicted with the Constitution’s guarantee of citizenship for nearly all babies born on US soil.
In response to that decision, Trump signed a new executive order last week that appeared to largely tighten laws already in place and narrow recognized exceptions. Among other things, the order said federal agencies would not recognize the citizenship of children whose parents are not citizens if either parent is “an alien enemy,” “a foreign government employee,” or engaged in so-called birth tourism.
The new order, lawyers with the American Civil Liberties Union and other civil rights groups told a federal judge in New Hampshire on Tuesday, “purports to strip birthright citizenship” from immigrants belonging to a class they represent “despite the Supreme Court’s recent decision.”
“To avoid any doubt in this regard, the court should underscore that the government may not strip away class members’ citizenship through any executive orders or other similarly flawed assertions of Executive power over birthright citizenship,” the attorneys wrote.
The request from the groups to US District Judge Joseph LaPlante is the first direct challenge to the new executive order. In at least one other case, lawyers who previously challenged Trump’s 2025 executive order have asked a judge in Maryland to assess whether the president’s new effort could impermissibly deny citizenship to their clients.
LaPlante, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, had ruled last July that Trump’s first order was unconstitutional and barred officials from being able to enforce it against anyone who may have been impacted by it. That case went up to the Supreme Court, which upheld his ruling.
The high court has long recognized some exceptions to the rule that anyone born in the US has a right to citizenship, and it did so again in its blockbuster decision this summer. But those are limited to children born to diplomats and “enemies” during a “hostile occupation.”
https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/11/politics/civil-rights-groups-challenge-trumps-new-birthright-citizenship-order
Atty: ‘It will not stand’: Trump targets birthright citizenship again after Supreme Court snub
Atty: ‘It will not stand’: Trump targets birthright citizenship again after Supreme Court snub
1:57
In court papers submitted Tuesday to LaPlante, the ACLU said that Trump’s attempt to broaden the exceptions was patently unlawful.
“The Supreme Court has been clear that the exceptions to the Citizenship Clause come from the Clause and the Court – not from the President,” they wrote, referring to the provision of the 14th Amendment that deals with citizenship.
In the Maryland case, lawyers representing immigrants who challenged Trump’s first executive order told the court that the Justice Department conveyed to them that the new action “operates only prospectively and is not effective until guidance is issued.” The department provided no other information about last week’s order, the lawyers said in a filing.
CNN has reached out to the Justice Department for comment.
CNN’s Priscilla Alvarez and John Fritze contributed to this report.
https://www.cnn.com/audio/podcasts/cnn-this-morning/episodes/c149d9b4-b53c-11f0-aeee-ab62e9ecf5fd
发表回复