新闻


文字实录:参议员伯尼·桑德斯做客《玛格丽特·布伦南直面国家》节目,2026年8月9日
2026-08-09T12:37:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

以下是佛蒙特州独立参议员伯尼·桑德斯的采访实录,该采访于2026年8月9日在《玛格丽特·布伦南直面国家》节目中播出。


玛格丽特·布伦南: 现在我们连线从伯灵顿赶来的佛蒙特州独立参议员伯尼·桑德斯。参议员,早上好。

参议员伯尼·桑德斯: 早上好。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 距离中期选举还有86天。周二的明尼苏达州,你背书的现任副州长、进步派候选人佩吉·弗拉纳根,将与温和派候选人安吉·克雷格展开角逐。你认为这场选战将和密歇根州一样势均力敌吗?

参议员桑德斯: 我认为这会是一场势均力敌的竞选。我非常希望佩吉能获胜。玛格丽特,我们在明尼苏达州、密歇根州以及全美各地看到的情况是,民众都清楚我们身处一个被操纵的经济体系中。有60%的美国人靠 paycheck to paycheck(注:月光族, paycheck指工资支票)过活,人们买不起食品杂货、住房和医疗保健这些基本生活必需品。但与此同时,美国最富有的人却变得更加富有。民众已经厌倦了现状政治和精英阶层的政策,他们渴望真正的变革。佩吉·弗拉纳根正是致力于推动真正的变革,敢于对抗大金钱利益集团。超级政治行动委员会和亿万富翁们正斥巨资涌入明尼苏达州,这背后自有原因。密歇根州的情况也是如此。他们不想看到有人站出来为明尼苏达州的工薪阶层发声。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 但你仍然相信弗拉纳根能最终胜出?

参议员桑德斯: 你说什么?

玛格丽特·布伦南: 你确信弗拉纳根会赢得选举?

参议员桑德斯: 不,我并不确信。我认为这会是一场极其胶着的竞选。我了解到她的竞选资金被对手以7比1的比例远超,在这种情况下,任何人都很难获胜。但她拥有出色的地面竞选团队,我知道她得到了大量草根民众的支持,我也会尽我所能帮助她赢得选举。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 好的。我知道你很少参与州长竞选,除了缅因州的情况。但威斯康星州的民主社会主义者弗朗西斯卡·洪有望赢得民主党初选。最近她的一些社交媒体帖子引发了不少关注,她的竞选纲领包括免费儿童保育、国营杂货店、扩大医疗补贴,还希望对百万富翁提高所得税。其中一些主张似乎和你的政策纲领一致,我想知道,你为什么没有支持她?她的部分主张是不是对你来说过于激进了?

参议员桑德斯: 不,对富人增税,确保威斯康星州乃至全美国的每个人都能将医疗保健作为一项权利,在我看来这相当合理。只是我们能够参与的竞选数量有限。我的大部分精力都集中在帮助候选人当选美国参议员和众议员上。所以除了一个例外,我们没有参与过任何州长竞选。那个例外是我认识多年的缅因州人士。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 那位人士现在正在缅因州竞选参议员?

参议员桑德斯: 没错,正是如此。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 密歇根州的投票人数创下了历史纪录,但选举结果比许多人预期的还要接近。前公共卫生官员阿卜杜勒·埃尔赛义德博士仅以1个百分点的优势获胜。此后,特朗普总统表示,他对埃尔赛义德获胜感到高兴,因为他认为埃尔赛义德是更容易击败的候选人,这基本是他的言下之意。《经济学人》的民调显示,民主党获胜的概率已降至48%,民主党掌控参议院的几率为49%。显然,你希望扭转这一局面,针对这一预测,你认为民主党应该采取什么样的联盟策略?

参议员桑德斯: 玛格丽特,我对这一分析的看法略有不同。在我看来,密歇根州埃尔赛义德的胜利是现代政治史上最非凡的胜利之一。你想想,你有没有听说过一位候选人在被对手以9比1的资金优势碾压的情况下还能获胜?那场竞选中,亿万富翁资助的超级政治行动委员会投入了6000万美元,其中一半来自美国以色列公共事务委员会(AIPAC),但埃尔赛义德还是成功胜出。现在,我们在全美各地看到的情况是,工薪阶层已经受够了——美国是世界上唯一一个不将医疗保健作为一项人权向所有人提供保障的主要国家。他们受够了严重的收入和财富不平等。谁会认为——我知道在国会和媒体里我们很少讨论这个话题,但我认识的所有人都不会认同,如今美国有一个人——马斯克先生拥有的财富比美国社会底层一半人口的财富总和还要多。谁会认为我们应该维持一个腐败的竞选财务体系,让亿万富翁们破坏美国的民主?我们之所以能获胜,是因为无论保守派还是民主党人,都已经厌倦了现状,厌倦了目前存在的严重不平等。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 你曾致信国会民主党领袖和民主党全国委员会,呼吁为选举提供公共资金,并要求民主党禁止政治行动委员会参与初选。我理解你这一主张的原则性立场。但与共和党及其雄厚的竞选资金储备相比,民主党确实面临着资金资源短缺的问题。民主党为什么要主动解除武装?

参议员桑德斯: 我们谈的不是解除武装。我们谈论的是在民主党初选范围内,而非大选期间。如今的竞选财务体系是腐败的。在密歇根州,你看到的情况是,美国以色列公共事务委员会在民主党初选中投入3000万美元试图击败埃尔赛义德。他们输了,但现在他们却说会支持共和党候选人罗杰斯。所以你会发现,无论属于哪个党派,特殊利益集团——不仅仅是美国以色列公共事务委员会,还有人工智能行业、加密货币行业——都会接管初选,试图推行他们的观点,实现他们的特殊利益,不管最终胜出的是哪个党派。在我看来,民主党允许某个实体介入初选,而如果他们在初选中失利,就转而支持另一党派的候选人,这简直是疯了。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 好的,我们需要就此展开更多讨论,但我必须先插播广告,稍作休息。请留步,桑德斯参议员。我们马上回来。

[广告插播]

玛格丽特·布伦南: 我们很快将继续采访佛蒙特州独立参议员伯尼·桑德斯,同时还将连线美国国立卫生研究院院长杰伊·巴塔查里亚博士,以及更多《直面国家》节目的内容。请继续收看。

[广告插播]

玛格丽特·布伦南: 欢迎回到《直面国家》。我们继续与参议员伯尼·桑德斯的对话。参议员,在广告插播前,我们谈到了你对超级政治行动委员会及其介入初选的担忧。你说过不希望民主党单方面解除武装。需要明确的是,你提到有6000万美元涌入密歇根州,用于击败阿卜杜勒·埃尔赛义德博士,其中一半资金来自美国以色列公共事务委员会。而正如你所指出的,该委员会现在表示将支持大选中的共和党候选人。你是否认同民主党可以在大选中接受政治行动委员会的资金,但在初选中不行?

参议员桑德斯: 听着,在我们目前所处的世界中,除非我们废除《公民联合组织案》裁决、取消超级政治行动委员会,并转向公共选举资金体系,否则这就是现实。你不能允许民主党候选人被对手以50比1的资金优势碾压,但当前的竞选财务体系确实是腐败的。民主党现在可以掌控初选范围内的情况。大选范围内做不到,但在初选中,民主党可以将超级政治行动委员会排除在外。这才是他们应该做的。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 我想特别谈谈美国以色列公共事务委员会,因为埃尔赛义德博士的竞选纲领包括削减对多国的无条件援助,不仅针对以色列。他说要削减对埃及——他父母移民的国家——、约旦、巴基斯坦和沙特阿拉伯的援助,他列出了多个国家,其中包括以色列。他对以色列和加沙战争的言论引发了大量批评。特朗普总统称这是对犹太人民的仇恨。我知道你在发言时会明确指向右翼的内塔尼亚胡政府,也就是现任总理。你会建议埃尔赛义德博士和其他进步派候选人调整发言方式,以避免招致如此多的批评吗?

参议员桑德斯: 听着,我认为阿卜杜勒的竞选活动非常出色,他完全有能力做出自己的政治判断。但玛格丽特,全美各地的民众都深切担忧——我们国内有太多问题。有民众无家可归,人们买不起医疗保健,而我们却在为右翼极端主义的内塔尼亚胡政府投入数十亿美元,这个政府对巴勒斯坦人民犯下了骇人听闻的暴行。包括我在内的许多专家都认为,当地正在发生的事情是种族灭绝。我认为无论民主党人、共和党人、保守派还是进步派,都不会认为我们应该继续资助这样一个极端主义政府。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 一些“让美国再次伟大”阵营的候选人也提出过类似的主张,但这确实成为了专门针对埃尔赛义德博士的攻击点。

参议员桑德斯: 好吧,我们要明确一点。从特朗普开始,你知道,特朗普本质上是个威权主义者,他会出于种族主义动机攻击埃尔赛义德。埃尔赛义德获胜后,他们立刻宣称他是穆斯林,说我们都应该憎恨穆斯林。你知道,这些人对我们国家面临的重大危机毫无见解,他们所能做的就是诉诸种族主义,给我们扣上共产主义者的帽子,诸如此类的胡言乱语。但我认为,归根结底,密歇根州的民众都明白现状行不通。我们需要像阿卜杜勒这样有勇气站出来为工薪阶层发声的候选人。他是一名医生,还写过一本关于《全民医保》的书。当前的医疗体系已经崩溃,我们必须保障所有人都能获得医疗保健。埃尔赛义德理解这一点,也会帮助我们朝着这个方向前进。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 桑德斯参议员,今天的采访就到这里。接下来我们将和杰伊·巴塔查里亚博士讨论医疗保健问题,我们会继续这部分对话。请稍候,马上回来。

Transcript: Sen. Bernie Sanders on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Aug. 9, 2026

2026-08-09T12:37:00-0400 / CBS News

The following is the transcript of an interview with Sen. Bernie Sanders, Independent of Vermont, that aired on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on Aug. 9, 2026.


MARGARET BRENNAN: And we turn now to Vermont Independent Senator Bernie Sanders, who joins us from Burlington. Good morning to you, Senator Sanders.

SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS: Good morning.

MARGARET BRENNAN: We are 86 days away from the midterms. Tuesday in Minnesota, progressive candidate Peggy Flanagan, the current lieutenant governor, who you have endorsed, is taking on a more moderate candidate, Angie Craig. Do you think this is going to be a similar dynamic to Michigan, where this was a tight race?

SEN. SANDERS: I think it’s going to be a tight race. I hope very much that Peggy wins. I think what we’re seeing in Minnesota, Margaret, in Michigan, and all across this country, is that people understand that we’re living with an economy that is rigged. You have working families. 60% of our people living paycheck-to-paycheck. People can’t afford groceries, housing, healthcare, basic necessities of life. And at the same time, they’re seeing the richest people in this country become even richer. People are tired of the status quo politics and establishment policies-they want real change. And Peggy Flanagan is about bringing about real change, standing up to the big money interests. There is a reason why the super PACs and the billionaires are flooding Minnesota with all kinds of money. Same thing as Michigan. They don’t want somebody to stand up for the working class in Minnesota.

MARGARET BRENNAN: But you still are confident Flanagan is going to pull this off.

SEN. SANDERS: I’m sorry?

MARGARET BRENNAN: You are confident Flanagan will win?

SEN. SANDERS: No, I’m not confident. I think it’s going to be a very, very close race. I think she is being outspent seven to one, and under those circumstances, it’s tough for anybody to win. But she has a good ground game. I know she has a lot of grassroots support, and I’ll do everything that I can to see that she does win.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, I know that you haven’t gotten involved in many governors’ races, with the exception of Maine. But Democratic Socialist Francesca Hong in Wisconsin is expected to win her Democratic primary. There’s been some attention to some of her social media posts recently, but she has this platform of free childcare, state-run grocery stores, more healthcare subsidies. She wants to raise income taxes on millionaires. Some of this does seem to align with your platform, so I’m wondering, you know, why don’t you support her? Is some of what she supports too extreme for you?

SEN. SANDERS: No, raising taxes on the rich, making sure that everybody in Wisconsin or America has health care as a right, sounds quite reasonable to me. I just look-we have a limited number of races that we can be involved in. Most of my focus on is getting people elected to the United States Senate, getting people elected to the House of Representatives. So, with one exception, we have not been involved in a governor’s race. So that’s somebody who I’ve known in Maine for many, many years.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Who, who is now running for the Senate in Maine?

SEN. SANDERS: That’s right. That’s right.

MARGARET BRENNAN: There was in Michigan this historic turnout, but the race was closer than many had expected. Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, former public health official, he did win by just one point. Since that time, President Trump has said he’s happy that he won because he’s going to be an easier candidate to defeat, basically, is what he’s implying. And The Economist has polling showing the party’s victory probability has fallen to 48% putting Democrats’ chances of controlling the Senate at 49%. Obviously, you want to resist that, that if that projection, what’s your strategy on a coalition here?

SEN. SANDERS: Well, I look at that analysis a little bit differently, Margaret. In Michigan, in my view, Abdul’s victory was one of the most extraordinary victories in modern political history. You tell me, have you ever heard of a candidate winning who was outspent nine to one, $60 million in billionaire-funded super PAC money came into that race, half from AIPAC, and yet he managed to win. Now I think what we are seeing all over this country, from coast to coast, is that working people are sick and tired of being the only major country on earth that does not guarantee healthcare to all people as a human right? They’re sick and tired of massive income and wealth inequality. Who believes- now I know we don’t discuss this much in Congress or in the media, but nobody that I know thinks it makes sense that one man in America today. Mr. Musk owns more wealth than the bottom half of American society. Who believes that we should sustain and maintain a corrupt campaign finance system where billionaires are undermining American democracy? The reason that we’re going to win is people, whether you’re conservative or Democrat, tired of the status quo and of the massive levels of inequality that exist right now.

MARGARET BRENNAN: You have written a letter that was shared with us to Democratic leaders in Congress and the DNC, calling for public funding of elections and for the party to prohibit political action committees from participating in primary races. I understand your principled argument here. However, Democrats have a financial resource problem that is very real as compared to Republicans and their war chest. Why would the party disarm?

SEN. SANDERS: We’re not talking about disarmament. We’re talking about within the Democratic primary, not in the general election. The campaign finance system today is corrupt. In Michigan, what you had is AIPAC spending 30 million dollars in the Democratic primary trying to defeat Abdul. They lost, and now they’re saying we’re going to support this guy Rogers, who is a Republican. So what you are seeing is it doesn’t matter whether you’re a Democrat, Republican. The special interests, not just AIPAC, it’s the AI people, it’s crypto. They will take over the primaries and try to get their point of view through, get their special interests accomplished, regardless of which party is. So to me, it is insane that the Democrats would allow somebody to come in, an entity to come in, that will then, if they lose, go into the other party.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, we need to talk more about this, but I have to pay our bills here and take a break. So please stay with us, Senator Sanders. We’ll be right back.

[COMMERCIAL BREAK]

MARGARET BRENNAN : We’ll be right back with more from Vermont Independent Senator Bernie Sanders and the head of the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, plus a lot more Face the Nation. So stay with us.

[COMMERCIAL BREAK]

MARGARET BRENNAN: Welcome back to Face the Nation. We return now to our conversation with Senator Bernie Sanders. Senator, before the break, we were talking about your concern about super PACs and their involvement in primaries. You said you don’t want Democrats to unilaterally disarm. Just to clarify, you highlighted 60 million dollars poured into Michigan to defeat Dr. El-Sayed. Half of it came from AIPAC. They are now saying they’re going to support the Republican in the general, which you also pointed out. Are you okay with Democrats accepting PAC money in the general, but not in the primary?

SEN. SANDERS: Look, in the world that we live in, until we get rid of Citizens United and get rid of super PACs and move to public funding of elections, that is the reality. You can’t allow Democratic candidates to be outspent 50 to one, but it is a corrupt campaign finance system, and Democrats can take charge of what takes place within their own primaries right now. General election can’t, but within primaries, Democrats can get super PACs out. That’s what they should do.

MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to focus in on AIPAC in particular because Dr. El-Sayed campaigned on this platform of cutting unconditional aid to countries, not just Israel. He said Egypt, the country his parents immigrated from, cut it to Jordan, cut it to Pakistan, cut it to Saudi Arabia. He listed a number of countries and Israel. His mention of Israel and the war in Gaza has drawn a lot of criticism. President Trump said it’s hate of Jewish people. When you speak, I know you are very specific in referring to the right-wing government of Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister. Would you advise Dr. El-Sayed and other progressive candidates to, to speak in a way that doesn’t invite as much criticism?

SEN. SANDERS: Look, I think Abdul has run a brilliant campaign, and he’s more than capable of making his own political judgments. But I think Margaret, all over the country, people are deeply concerned that when- we have so many problems at home. We have people sleeping out in the streets. People can’t afford health care. We are spending billions and billions of dollars on the right-wing extremist Netanyahu government, which has done horrific things to the Palestinian people. People, many people, experts, including myself, consider what’s going on there as a genocide. And I think whether a Democrat, Republican, conservative, progressive, we don’t think that we should be continuing to fund an extremist government like that.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Some MAGA candidates also make that argument, but this is a real attack line being focused on Dr. El-Sayed in particular.

SEN. SANDERS: Well, let’s be clear. I mean, from Trump on down, you know, you have Trump, who is in many ways an authoritarian type, and he is going to go after El-Sayed because, you know, for racist reasons. I think their first announcement after Abdul won is, he is a Muslim, and we’re all supposed to hate Muslims. You know these guys have nothing to say about the major crises facing our country. All they could do is appeal to racism. We’re communists. You know all kinds of nonsense like that. But I think that at the end of the day, the people of Michigan understand that the status quo is not working. We need a candidate like Abdul who has the guts to stand up for working class families. This guy wrote a book, he’s a doctor, on Medicare For All. The current healthcare system is broken. We got to guarantee healthcare to all people. Abdul understands that and will help us move in that direction.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Senator Sanders, we’ll leave it there. We’re going to talk about healthcare next with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, so we’ll continue that part of the conversation. We’ll be right back.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2