美国法官允许终止南苏丹裔移民的驱逐保护

US judge allows deportation protections to end for South Sudanese

2026-08-07 16:20:40 UTC / Reuters

By Nate Raymond

August 7, 2026 4:20 PM UTC Updated 2 hours ago

The seal of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is seen in Arlington, Texas, U.S. August 26, 2025. REUTERS/Shelby Tauber Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

• Summary

• Ruling lets DHS end Temporary Protected Status for South Sudan
• Judge rejects arguments that only the attorney general can terminate TPS
• South Sudan first received TPS designation in 2011

Aug 7 (Reuters) – A federal judge on Friday cleared the way for ​U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration to end temporary protections from deportation that had allowed hundreds of ‌South Sudanese nationals to live and work in the United States.

U.S. District Judge Patti Saris in Boston rejected a last-ditch effort, opens new tab by immigrant-rights advocates to maintain South Sudan’s Temporary Protected Status designation after the U.S. Supreme Court in June allowed the administration to end similar protections for thousands ​of people from Haiti and Syria.

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

The Supreme Court’s ruling, powered by its 6-3 conservative majority, curtailed the ability of ​lower-court judges to review the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s efforts under Trump to end ⁠TPS for about a dozen countries.

That designation covers people whose home countries have experienced natural disasters, armed conflicts or ​other extraordinary events, providing eligible migrants temporary protection from deportation and work authorization.

DHS moved in November to terminate TPS for conflict-ridden ​South Sudan, saying the country no longer met the conditions for the designation, which was first issued in 2011.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

The department’s action would have led to the end of protections for more than 232 South Sudanese and at least 73 South Sudanese with pending applications. An ​earlier order by Saris had blocked that from happening.

LEGAL CHALLENGE ON NEW GROUNDS

After the Supreme Court’s ruling, lawyers for a group ​of South Sudanese nationals and the nonprofit African Communities Together urged Saris to once again block the end of TPS on new ‌grounds that ⁠the justices had not addressed.

That included an argument that DHS lacked authority to terminate TPS because the statute that created the TPS program in 1990 referred only to the attorney general as the official who had authority to extend and terminate the deportation protections.

DHS was established later, in 2002, after the attacks of September 11, 2001.

Most of the U.S. Department ​of Justice’s immigration-related functions were ​transferred to it at ⁠that time. Saris, who was appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton, concluded Congress had likewise transferred authority over TPS to DHS.

blob:https://www.reuters.com/e7d676b1-2561-40b1-876e-a85865aa03d9

She said arguments to the contrary rested on a “self-contradictory, self-defeating ​foundation,” since if DHS had no authority to terminate TPS for South Sudan it also ​never had ⁠the ability to extend protections in the first place.

“South Sudan’s original TPS designation would thus be invalid by the same token as its termination,” she said.

James Percival, DHS’s general counsel, in a social media post on X urged other judges hearing similar ⁠TPS cases ​to follow Saris and lift orders preventing it from ending the protections ​for people from other countries.

“Every day these ‘administrative stays’ are in effect is a day the American people are denied what they voted for,” he said.

Spokespeople ​for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Matthew Lewis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab