参议院委员会投票认定福西藐视国会,拟直接将案件移交司法部以跳过全院投票


2026-08-06T09:14:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)新闻

撰文
更新于:2026年8月6日 / 美国东部时间上午10:49 / 哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)新闻

华盛顿讯 参议院国土安全委员会周四投票认定安东尼·福西博士藐视国会,起因是他在上周委员会作证时拒绝回答问题,委员会认为他不当援引了第五修正案中反对自证其罪的权利。

“对证人提出藐视国会指控是一件严肃的事,应当极少动用,”委员会主席兰德·保罗参议员在周四委员会会议召开时说道,“但藐视国会的权力正是为这类情况设立的。”

由共和党主导的委员会周四以8票赞成、5票反对的结果通过了认定福西藐视国会的决议,所有民主党议员投下反对票,另有两人通过代理投票表示反对。按照常规流程,下一步应提交参议院全院投票,但兰德·保罗告诉哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)新闻,他打算直接将藐视国会决议移交司法部。

image
2026年8月6日,兰德·参议员抵达华盛顿特区参议院国土安全委员会会议现场。安娜·莫尼梅克 / 盖蒂图片社

上周,福西在委员会作证期间对所有被问及的问题均援引了第五修正案。他是在传票要求下出席该听证会的,此次听证是委员会对新冠疫情起源调查的一部分。

听证会召开前,多年来一直指责福西就疫情源头误导公众的肯塔基州共和党参议员保罗,公开了福西在领导美国政府应对新冠大流行期间的1000多页日记。福西在委员会的开场陈述中提及这份文件的公开,称保罗“明显痴迷于要求对我提起诉讼”。

“我能得出的唯一结论是,他召集我出席本次委员会听证会的唯一目的,就是让我说些什么、任何能印证他此前多次公开表态的话,用他的话说就是‘把我送进监狱’,”福西在谈及保罗时说道。

美国宪法第五修正案赋予公民不得自证其罪的权利,但保罗辩称,福西无权援引第五修正案,因为拜登政府时期的赦免已经使他免受起诉。福西的律师上周告诉哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)新闻,福西援引第五修正案特权“有充分的法律依据”。但保罗认为这是一个尚未定论的法律问题。

在周四投票前,保罗强调委员会并非就福西的观点或政策进行表决,而是就“一名已经获得联邦全面赦免的证人,是否能被本委员会下令回答问题——以及公然违抗命令却不受惩罚”这一问题进行表决。

“我们只有一个问题:是否要认定一名证人藐视国会,”保罗说,“这名证人有无数机会回答与我们调查相关的问题,而他111次都选择了拒绝。”

周四上午的委员会会议期间,委员会民主党议员多次尝试暂缓或推迟投票,但均被委员会的共和党多数派否决。

委员会资深民主党议员、密歇根州参议员加里·彼得斯在投票前公开反对该决议,敦促议员们投反对票,并辩称这一举措会损害委员会的公信力,只为达成保罗所谓的“针对单一个人的多年运动”。

“刑事藐视法庭是惩罚性措施。它不能强迫证人回答问题或提供我们所有人都希望看到的文件,”彼得斯说,“但它会开创一个破坏性先例,未来的证人会以此抵制国会的合法监督,削弱本委员会强制作证的能力。”

共和党加速将案件移交司法部

虽然国会藐视指控通常会在委员会审议后提交参议院全院审议,但保罗辩称这一流程并非强制要求。

“我们将于明天将文件送交司法部,不会有任何延误,”保罗周三告诉记者,“这将是委员会的正式建议。”

保罗表示,参议院也可在8月休会后由全院进行投票,他指出这取决于共和党领导层。但他承认,“可能没有必要”这么做,因为司法部的移交程序已经优先推进。

认定福西藐视国会的动议几乎肯定无法达到参议院多数立法通常所需的60票门槛。目前参议院有53名共和党议员,该动议需要获得民主党议员的支持,而民主党近期大多公开为福西辩护。

该决议要求参议院议长、副总统JD·万斯将 detailing 福西拒绝回答问题的报告,送交哥伦比亚特区联邦检察官珍妮娜·皮罗。是否对福西提起指控将由司法部决定。

2021年和2022年由民主党掌控的国会,曾就多名特朗普盟友拒绝配合与国会山骚乱调查相关的传票一事,建议对其提起藐视指控。司法部对史蒂夫·班农和彼得·纳瓦罗提起了诉讼,二人均被定罪并服刑数月。

乔·沃尔什为本报道贡献了内容。

Senate committee votes to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress, seeking to bypass floor vote with DOJ referral

2026-08-06T09:14:00-0400 / CBS News

By

Updated on: August 6, 2026 / 10:49 AM EDT / CBS News

Washington — The Senate Homeland Security Committee voted Thursday to hold Dr. Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress over his refusal to answer questions during testimony before the committee last week, arguing that he inappropriately invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

“Holding a witness in contempt is a serious thing, and it should be rare,” Sen. Rand Paul, the committee chairman, said as the panel gathered Thursday. “But the contempt power exists for precisely this circumstance.”

The GOP-led committee voted 8 to 5 Thursday on the resolution to hold Fauci in contempt, with all Democrats opposing, and two more opposing by proxy vote. While the next step would typically be a vote on the Senate floor, Paul told CBS News that he intends to send the contempt resolution directly to the Justice Department as a referral.

Sen. Rand Paul arrives at a Senate Homeland Security Committee meeting on Aug. 6, 2026 in Washington, D.C. Anna Moneymaker / Getty Images

Last week, Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment in response to every question he was asked before the committee, where he appeared for a hearing under subpoena as part of the panel’s investigation into the origins of COVID-19.

Ahead of the hearing, Paul, a Kentucky Republican who has for years accused Fauci of misleading the public about the source of the outbreak, released more than 1,000 pages of Fauci’s journal entries from his time leading the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Fauci cited the release in his opening statement before the committee, claiming Paul has an “obvious obsession with calling for my prosecution.”

“The only conclusion I can reach is that the sole reason he is calling me before this committee is to get me to say something, anything, that could vindicate his repeated public pledges that I end up, in his words, quote, ‘behind bars,’” Fauci said of Paul.

While the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution grants people the right not to incriminate themselves, Paul has argued that Fauci couldn’t invoke the Fifth because he is already insulated from prosecution by a Biden-era pardon. Fauci’s attorney told CBS News last week that Fauci had “solid legal ground” in asserting his Fifth Amendment privilege. But Paul argues that it’s an unsettled legal question.

Ahead of the vote Thursday, Paul stressed that the panel wasn’t voting on Fauci’s opinions or policies, but the question of “whether a witness, who has received the benefit of a sweeping federal pardon, can be ordered by this committee to answer questions — and then defy that order without consequence.”

“We only have one question: Whether to hold a witness responsible for his contempt toward Congress,” Paul said. “The witness had many chances to answer the questions pertinent to our investigation, and he made his decision 111 times.”

During the committee meeting Thursday morning, Democrats on the committee tried repeatedly to table or postpone the vote, but were blocked by the panel’s GOP majority.

Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan, the top Democrat on the committee, spoke out against the resolution ahead of the vote, urging committee members to oppose it and arguing that it puts the credibility of the panel at risk for the sake of what he called Paul’s “years-long campaign against a single individual.”

“Criminal contempt is punitive. It does not compel a witness to answer questions or produce the documents we’d all like to see,” Peters said. “What it will do is create a damaging precedent that future witnesses will use to resist legitimate congressional oversight and weaken this committee’s ability to compel testimony.”

Republicans fast-track DOJ referral

While contempt of Congress resolutions are typically considered by the full Senate after a committee’s consideration, Paul has argued that the step isn’t required.

“We will send it to the Department of Justice tomorrow so there’s no delay,” Paul told reporters Wednesday. “That will be a committee recommendation.”

Paul said the full Senate could also vote after the chamber returns from August recess, which he noted would be up to GOP leaders. But he acknowledged that “there might not be” a point to doing so, with the prioritization of a DOJ recommendation.

The move to hold Fauci in contempt would all but certainly fall short of the 60-vote threshold needed to advance most legislation in the upper chamber. With 53 Republicans, it would require support from Democrats, who have widely come to Fauci’s defense in recent days.

The resolution dictates that the president of the Senate, Vice President JD Vance, certify the report detailing Fauci’s refusal to answer questions to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Jeanine Pirro. Whether to charge Fauci would be up to the Justice Department.

The Democrat-led Congress in 2021 and 2022 recommended contempt charges for several Trump allies for refusing to comply with subpoenas related to the investigation into the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. The Justice Department charged Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, who were both found guilty and served months in prison.

Joe Walsh contributed to this report.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2