路透社/益普索民调:随着伊朗战事迁延,美国民众担忧中东局势进一步动荡


2026-08-06T10:06:08.479Z / 路透社

摘要

  • 仅35%的美国人支持这场战争,路透社/益普索民调显示
  • 58%的受访者预计汽油价格将上涨,仅15%认为价格会回落,民调结果显示
  • 本次民调在全国范围内调查了4505名美国成年人,误差幅度为2个百分点

华盛顿8月6日路透电 — 据路透社/益普索最新民调,在美伊开战五个月后,认为中东局势将走向混乱的美国民众比例是认为战争能带来更多稳定者的三倍。

这项为期六天的民调于周一结束,与此同时共和党籍总统唐纳德·特朗普再次放弃此前威胁对伊朗发动“大规模打击”的言论,凸显出这场他最初预言会速战速决的战事所笼罩的不确定性。

订阅《路透伊朗局势简报》新闻通讯,可随时获取伊朗战事的最新进展与分析。点击此处注册

50%的民调受访者认为,未来一年美国在伊朗的军事行动将破坏中东地区稳定,这一比例约是认为战争能为该地区带来更多稳定的受访者比例(17%)的三倍。另有16%的人表示地区稳定状况将大致维持不变,17%的人表示不确定或未回答该问题。

美国民众对汽油价格也持悲观态度。由于伊朗封锁霍尔木兹海峡这一全球石油供应的关键航道,汽油价格已出现上涨。约58%的受访者预计汽油价格将进一步走高,仅有15%的人认为价格会回落。

受访者对俄罗斯入侵乌克兰也持类似悲观看法,多数人担心未来几年冲突局势会恶化,同时也对全球其他地区爆发新冲突表示担忧。

政治风险

民调结果凸显了特朗普及其共和党同僚在11月中期选举中捍卫微弱国会多数席位面临的政治风险。

特朗普于2025年1月连任,期间誓言避免“愚蠢的战争”,这一论调获得了厌倦了2001年9月11日基地组织袭击后二十年战争的选民的共鸣。

与总体支持特朗普的情况不同,共和党内部在如何看待他对伊朗发动的战争上存在严重分歧。尽管80%的共和党人认可特朗普的总统表现,66%的人支持他处理伊朗问题的方式,但仅有不到一半(41%)的共和党人认为,这场战争将在未来一年改善中东地区的稳定局势。

战事已导致伊朗向邻国和商业航运设施发射导弹和无人机,并在黎巴嫩引发新的冲突,该冲突在美国斡旋停火后有所缓和。伊朗支持的也门胡塞武装也威胁将袭击途经红海南端曼德海峡的沙特船只。

曾在特朗普第一任期担任国务院中东事务最高负责人的戴维·申克表示,即便战事迅速结束,其经济影响也可能持续存在。但他同时表示,尚不能确定这场战争会导致中东地区局势更加动荡,他辩称美国和以色列的袭击已大幅削弱了伊朗的军事能力及其地区代理人网络。

“我认为人们并未意识到伊朗军事能力已遭到严重削弱,”现任职于华盛顿近东政策研究所的申克说道。

特朗普于2月底与以色列联手发动的这场战争已耗费美国纳税人至少375亿美元,造成18名美军士兵阵亡,以及数千名伊朗人死亡。

一场不受欢迎的战争

仅有35%的美国人支持这场战争。当被问及哪个政党在处理战争与恐怖主义问题上的方案更优时,登记选民选择民主党多于共和党——37%对36%——这是自2024年12月路透社/益普索开始就该问题进行民调以来,民主党首次领先,当时共和党以39%对28%领先。民调还显示,选民首次在近十年来认为民主党更有能力管理经济。

“这场战争在爆发当天就不受欢迎,且之后愈发不得人心,”华盛顿智库卡托研究所国防与外交政策研究主任贾斯汀·洛根说道。

洛根表示,特朗普面临着艰难的权衡:他为这场冲突设定了雄心勃勃的目标——摧毁伊朗的导弹能力并阻止其获得核武器——同时又试图限制美军伤亡以及由此带来的政治代价。

“战争指挥中的这种混乱或无方向性,正给总统带来更多麻烦,”洛根说道。

对乌克兰、中国的担忧

民调发现,美国民众还严重担忧现有战事会升级以及新的战争爆发。约58%的受访者表示,担心俄乌冲突局势恶化——目前美国及其欧洲盟友正向乌克兰提供武器和情报支持。

另有55%的人担忧中国会在台湾问题上引发冲突,48%的人担心俄罗斯会与乌克兰以外的欧洲国家爆发战争。37%的人担忧美国会因格陵兰岛问题开战。

本次路透社/益普索民调以线上方式开展,共收集了全国4505名美国成年人的反馈,误差幅度为2个百分点。

杰森·兰热与西蒙·刘易斯华盛顿报道;斯科特·马龙与桑吉夫·米格拉尼编辑

我们的报道准则:汤姆森路透社信任原则。

杰森·兰热是专注于政治数据报道的华盛顿通讯员。可发送爆料邮件至jason.lange@thomsonreuters.com

As Iran war drags on, Americans are bracing for more chaos in Middle East, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

2026-08-06T10:06:08.479Z / Reuters

Summary

  • Just 35% of Americans approve of war, Reuters/Ipsos poll shows
  • 58% expect gasoline prices to worsen while 15% expect improvement, poll shows
  • Poll surveyed 4,505 U.S. adults nationwide and had 2-point margin of error

WASHINGTON, Aug 6 (Reuters) – Five months into the U.S. war with Iran, Americans who expect the Middle East to slide toward chaos outnumber those who see the war bringing more stability ​by three to one, according to a new Reuters/Ipsos poll.

The six-day poll concluded on Monday, as Republican President Donald Trump again backed away from threatened “massive attacks” on ‌Iran, underscoring uncertainty surrounding a conflict he initially predicted would bring a swift victory.

The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

Fifty percent of poll respondents said they thought U.S. military action in Iran would destabilize the Middle East over the next year, about three times the 17% who said the war would lead to more stability in the region. Another 16% said stability would stay about the same and 17% said they were unsure or didn’t answer the question.

Americans were also pessimistic about gasoline prices, which ​have risen as Iran has choked off traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for global oil supplies. Some 58% said they expected gas prices to worsen, while ​just 15% expected them to improve.

Respondents held similarly grim views about the Russian invasion of Ukraine, with a majority fearing it will get worse over ⁠the next few years, and also raising concerns about new conflicts arising elsewhere on the world stage.

POLITICAL RISK

The findings underscore the political risks for Trump and his fellow Republicans as they seek to ​defend narrow congressional majorities in November’s midterm elections.

Trump returned to office in January 2025 vowing to avoid “stupid wars”, a message that resonated with voters weary of the two decades of war that followed the September ​11, 2001, al Qaeda attacks.

Republicans, in contrast with their general support for Trump, were sharply divided on how they see his war with Iran playing out. While 80% of Republicans approve of Trump’s performance as president and 66% back his handling of Iran, fewer than half – 41% – think stability in the Middle East will get better over the next year as a result of the war.

The war has led to Iranian missile and drone attacks against neighboring ​countries and commercial shipping, and sparked new fighting in Lebanon, which has reduced in intensity since a U.S.-brokered truce. The Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen have also threatened Saudi shipping transiting the Bab al-Mandeb ​chokepoint at the southern end of the Red Sea.

David Schenker, who served as the State Department’s top Middle East official during Trump’s first term, said the economic effects could persist even if the fighting ended quickly. But ‌he said it ⁠was not certain the war would result in a more unstable Middle East, arguing that U.S. and Israeli attacks had significantly weakened Iran’s military capabilities and the regional proxy network.

“I don’t think there’s an understanding of the nature of the degradation of Iran’s capabilities, which is significant,” said Schenker, now with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

The war, which Trump launched with Israel in late February, has cost U.S. taxpayers at least $37.5 billion, killed 18 U.S. service members and killed thousands of Iranians.

AN UNPOPULAR WAR

Just 35% of Americans approve of the war. Asked which political party has a better approach to handling ​war and terrorism, registered voters picked Democrats over ​Republicans – 37% to 36% – the first time Democrats ⁠led since Reuters/Ipsos polling began posing the question in December 2024, when Republicans led 39% to 28%. The poll also showed voters now see Democrats as better able to manage the economy for the first time in about a decade.

“This war was unpopular the day it started, and it’s gotten more unpopular since,” said ​Justin Logan, director of defense and foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute, a Washington think tank.

Logan said Trump faced a difficult tradeoff: ​He has set ambitious goals ⁠for the conflict – destroying Iran’s missile capabilities and preventing it from ever obtaining a nuclear weapon – while seeking to limit U.S. casualties and the political costs that could come with them.

“That incoherence, or rudderlessness, in the conduct of the war is causing more problems for the president,” Logan said.

WORRIES ABOUT UKRAINE, CHINA

The poll found that Americans also have significant concerns that wars underway will get worse and that new wars will break out. ⁠Some 58% said ​they were concerned the Russia-Ukraine war, in which Washington and European allies have supported Kyiv with weapons and intelligence, could get ​worse.

Another 55% said they worried about China engaging in conflict with Taiwan while 48% were concerned a war could break out between Russia and a European country other than Ukraine. Some 37% worried the U.S. would go to war over Greenland.

The Reuters/Ipsos ​poll was conducted online, gathering responses from 4,505 U.S. adults nationwide. It had a margin of error of 2 percentage points.

Reporting by Jason Lange and Simon Lewis; editing by Scott Malone and Sanjeev Miglani

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Jason Lange is a Washington correspondent focused on political data. Send tips to jason.lange@thomsonreuters.com

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2