2026-08-04T10:10:11.34Z / 路透社
2026年7月29日,美国代理司法部长托德·布兰奇在美国华盛顿国会山哈特参议院办公楼内穿行。路透社/安娜·罗斯·莱登/资料图片 购买授权许可,打开新标签页
- 内容摘要
- 布兰奇有望向司法部长提名更近一步
- 参议院全体确认投票或于本周晚些时候举行
- 此次投票前,布兰奇已终止“反政治迫害基金”并缩小针对特朗普的税务审计豁免范围
华盛顿8月4日路透电 —— 托德·布兰奇有望在周二通过其美国司法部长提名道路上的一道关键关卡,但围绕他所称将终结唐纳德·特朗普总统“反政治迫害”基金、并缩小给予特朗普豁免过往税务申报审计权限的协议,仍存在诸多疑问。
布兰奇曾是特朗普的私人律师,现任代理司法部长。他于周日同意修改该基金及税务豁免协议的条款,以争取两名持观望态度的共和党参议员的支持,但批评人士称,这些修改力度仍不足。
通过《每日案卷》新闻简报将最新法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱,开启您的清晨阅读。点击此处订阅。
他发布的命令称已终止该基金,并指示相关税务豁免协议仅禁止对特朗普、其儿子及其家族企业的过往税务申报进行审计。不过,该协议仍允许对未来的税务申报进行审计。
两名持观望态度的参议员约翰·科宁和汤姆·蒂利斯周一表示,他们对该协议感到满意,并将投票支持布兰奇的提名在司法委员会推进。预计该委员会将批准此项提名,这将为本周晚些时候的参议院全体确认投票扫清障碍。
批评人士称布兰奇达成的协议是一场“闹剧”,认为该协议无法阻止特朗普日后重启该基金,也无法解决特朗普政府为其规避税务审查的伦理问题。一些人呼吁共和党人通过立法,明确禁止该基金被重启,并终止特朗普的税务保护措施。
“司法委员会及其成员不应满足于代理司法部长仅兑现承诺将相关内容写入法规,”委员会成员、民主党参议员亚当·希夫在一份声明中说道。
围绕特朗普税务豁免权和18亿美元“反政治迫害基金”的争议,源于特朗普针对美国国税局的100亿美元诉讼的和解协议。
该基金旨在支持那些声称因政治活动而遭到不当起诉的人,可能会令那些称因参与2021年1月6日美国国会大厦袭击事件而遭联邦政府 targeting 的特朗普盟友受益。
“真正的承诺”
批评人士称其为共和党人的“分肥基金”,并指出特朗普的私人律师并未签署布兰奇终止该基金的命令,尽管最初的和解协议要求所有当事方批准才能做出任何修改。特朗普的律师尚未就此事公开置评。
司法部和布兰奇在法庭上拒绝表态“反政治迫害基金”永远无法重启,而特朗普则多次表示他非常支持发放这笔款项的想法。
上周,在科宁和蒂利斯要求提供书面证据证明该基金已终止、税务豁免协议将被缩减后,司法委员会推迟了确认投票。
科宁和蒂利斯称他们代表了 fellow 共和党参议员的观点,他们的要求是特朗普第二任期内最引人注目的共和党党内反抗事件之一,此前特朗普一直要求其政党成员绝对效忠。
就该基金提起诉讼的倡导组织“民主前进”周一致信司法部,要求其宣布该项目永久取消,打开新标签页。
“他们要求美国参议院议员相信‘反政治迫害基金’已不复存在,却又拒绝就该基金的运作和未来在法庭上做出真正有约束力的承诺,以此讨好总统,”“民主前进”主席斯凯·佩里曼说道。
在布兰奇的领导下,司法部起诉了特朗普认定的对手,同时颠覆了司法部长期以来的独立规范。布兰奇还负责公布了已故性犯罪者杰弗里·爱泼斯坦的相关文件。他还吹嘘犯罪率持续下降。
丹·罗森茨威格-齐夫报道;安迪·沙利文和斯蒂芬·库茨编辑
我们的准则:汤森路透信托原则,打开新标签页
Blanche set to clear nomination hurdle after deal wins senators’ vote
2026-08-04T10:10:11.34Z / Reuters
Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche walks through the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 29, 2026. REUTERS/Anna Rose Layden/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
- Summary
- Blanche is expected to take step closer to attorney general nomination
- Full Senate confirmation vote could take place later this week
- Vote comes after Blanche narrowed tax audit immunity for Trump and ordered ‘weaponization fund’ dead
WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters) – Todd Blanche is expected to clear a hurdle on Tuesday on his path to nomination for U.S. attorney general, but questions persist about a deal he said would end President Donald Trump’s “anti-weaponization” fund and narrow an agreement giving Trump immunity from audits of past tax returns.
Blanche, Trump’s former personal lawyer and the current acting attorney general, agreed on Sunday to amend the terms of the fund and the tax immunity deal in order to win the backing of two holdout Republican senators, although critics say the amendments do not go far enough.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
He issued orders that he said ended the fund, and directed that the related tax immunity agreement only barred audits on past tax returns of Trump, his son and their family business. The agreement, though, allows for tax audits on future tax returns.
The holdout senators, John Cornyn and Thom Tillis, said on Monday they were pleased with the agreement and would vote to advance Blanche’s nomination through the Judiciary Committee. Approval by the committee, which is expected, would clear the way for a Senate confirmation vote later this week.
Critics called the deal Blanche struck a “farce,” arguing it does not prevent Trump from resurrecting the fund later and does not resolve the ethics of Trump’s administration shielding him from tax scrutiny. Some called on Republicans to pass legislation that would explicitly bar the fund from being revived and end Trump’s tax protections.
“The Judiciary Committee and its members should not settle for less than the Acting Attorney General following through on his promise of helping to write this into statute,” Democratic Senator Adam Schiff, who sits on the committee, said in a statement.
The dispute over Trump’s tax immunity and the $1.8 billion weaponization fund stems from a settlement of Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS.
The fund is meant to support people who claim they have been unfairly prosecuted for their political activities, and could benefit Trump allies who have said they were targeted by the federal government for their involvement in the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.
“REAL COMMITMENTS”
Critics have called it a Republican slush fund and noted that Trump’s personal lawyers did not sign off on Blanche’s order to end it, even though the original settlement requires approval from all parties to make any changes. Trump’s lawyers have not publicly commented on the matter.
The Justice Department and Blanche have refused in court to say the weaponization fund could never be resurrected, and Trump has repeatedly said how much he loves the idea of the payouts.
The Judiciary Committee postponed its confirmation vote last week after Cornyn and Tillis demanded written proof that the fund was dead and the tax immunity deal would be scaled back.
The demands from Cornyn and Tillis, who said they represented views held by fellow Republican senators, were among the highest-profile Republican revolts against the president in his second term, when he has called for complete loyalty from his party.
Democracy Forward, an advocacy group which is suing over the fund,
sent a letter Monday, opens new tab
asking the DOJ to declare the program permanently canceled.
“They ask members of the United States Senate to believe the Anti-Weaponization Fund is dead while they seek to preserve favor with the president through refusing to make real commitments backed up in court regarding the operation and future of the fund,” said Skye Perryman, president of Democracy Forward.
Under Blanche’s leadership, the Justice Department has prosecuted Trump’s perceived enemies while upending long-standing norms of the department’s independence. Blanche also oversaw the release of files related to late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. He has also touted declining crime numbers.
Reporting by Dan Rosenzweig-Ziff; editing by Andy Sullivan and Stephen Coates
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
发表回复