transcript:民主党参议员马克·凯利做客《与玛格丽特·布伦南面对面》节目,2026年8月2日
2026-08-02T12:51:02-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
以下是亚利桑那州民主党参议员马克·凯利的采访实录,该采访于2026年8月2日在《与玛格丽特·布伦南面对面》节目中播出。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 我们现在来连线亚利桑那州民主党参议员马克·凯利,他今天上午从俄亥俄州哥伦布市和我们连线。早上好,参议员。
参议员马克·凯利: 早上好,玛格丽特。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 这场我们被告知只会持续四到五周的战争已经进入第六个月了。过去一周,打击目标范围扩大了。伊朗袭击了埃及,我们看到沙特阿拉伯加入美国,对当地受伊朗支持的武装组织实施空袭,而就在昨晚,特朗普总统使用了一个说法,称他正在考虑采取自二战以来从未有过规模的军事行动。你在情报委员会和军事委员会任职,本届政府有没有向你透露过针对伊朗的行动计划?
凯利参议员: 他们没有透露这些最新计划。我认为我们看到的是一位行事相当反复无常的总统,他说一套做一套,这是在升级局势。目前来看,他正试图让我们回到二月份的状态,我觉得如果可以的话,他一定会这么做。如果有一个大的重置按钮,他肯定会毫不犹豫地按下。听着,我们已经有18名美国人丧生,全国范围内的物价都在飙升。我现在就在俄亥俄州,前几天我会见了一些退伍军人,他们的日子过得很艰难。这些都是退伍军人,他们买不起汽油,买不起 groceries,房租也在上涨,但这位总统并没有在处理美国民众真正需要他解决的问题。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 你知道吗,我们的民调显示,这场战争非常不受欢迎,这也拉低了总统本人的支持率。但民主党人的处境更糟。根据哥伦比亚广播公司的民调,当被问及谁在伊朗问题上的处理方式更好时,32%的人支持特朗普和共和党,只有30%的人支持民主党。所以我们已经深陷其中了。民主党是不是需要提出一个明确的方案来结束这场战争?
凯利参议员: 我认为这根本不是总统的方案。这个人在没有战略目标、没有行动计划、没有时间线的情况下就把我们拖进了这场战争。他的国防部长连这场战争都不会指挥,一开始还把尽可能多地向目标投放弹药当作一个好的衡量标准,结果现在我们出现了弹药短缺。这一点都不奇怪。所以他们现在手足无措,陷入了困境,这一切都是他们造成的,而总统必须想办法摆脱当前的局面。不过我要建议他,解决办法不是重复他之前一直在做的事情,不要让他的房地产老友和女婿来负责谈判,而是应该派一些真正懂行的人进来,知道如何和伊朗人沟通,组建一个联盟,重新团结我们的盟友。他不仅疏远了海湾合作委员会的盟友,还疏远了欧洲盟友,这让他更难找到脱身的办法。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 但《华盛顿邮报》报道称,美国驻欧洲最高指挥官格林克维奇将军曾警告五角大楼,他没有足够的资源来保护以色列免受弹道导弹袭击,如果再没有另一艘海军驱逐舰可用,他将不得不在保卫本土和保卫以色列之间做出选择。目前以色列似乎不会重新投入战斗,但这对你来说意味着什么?你有没有从这位最高指挥官那里听说过这些担忧?
凯利参议员: 我没有从格林克维奇那里具体听到过这个问题,但玛格丽特,这并不是什么高深的学问,不难想明白。我们已经向14000多个目标投放了多种弹药,这会给弹药储备带来巨大压力。所以当然,我们的指挥官,可能不仅是欧洲战区,其他地方的指挥官也开始感受到压力,担心如果需要保卫本土或盟友,他们能不能满足需求。你能理解为什么这对他来说是个问题,这都是因为这场战争一开始就没有战略目标,没有目标的话,就很难确定下一步该怎么做。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 没错。
凯利参议员: 我想这就是为什么赫格塞特会试图用打击目标的数量来创造纪录。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 是的,我应该说明一下,五角大楼表示这是媒体的猜测,他们不会对作战能力发表评论。我们已经请他们澄清了这一点。但在补充弹药的问题上,赫格塞特国防部长表示,他需要国会拨款来补充弹药,需要国会拨款来支付军饷,总共需要670亿美元。你最近被问及此事时,曾表示对如何投票支持额外拨款一事尚未决定。你怎么能拒绝这笔必要的资金呢?
凯利参议员: 玛格丽特,去年我们通过了超过一万亿美元的国防预算,这还是有史以来第一次。当时我们被告知这是对国防部的一次性世代投资,但在我看来,他们把这笔钱挥霍掉了。现在他们又来要1.5万亿美元,再加上一项追加拨款。我们快要达到全球其他所有国家一年国防开支的总和了,这太不负责任了,现在他们还想要一张空白支票。听着,我会确保部队有足够的装备来保卫自己和美国——
玛格丽特·布伦南: ——所以你会投票支持那670亿美元?——
凯利参议员: ——但他们需要拿出一个合理的方案。那1.5万亿美元预算里,有很多系统我非常确定根本不会奏效。他们还在为洲际弹道导弹研发天基拦截器,这方面的物理原理非常非常复杂,这不会让我们更安全。还有一些系统我们根本不需要。他们需要明白,我们国家的资源不是无限的。我们的国债已经达到39.5万亿美元,而他们要求的国防预算是我2021年进入参议院时的两倍,整整翻了一番。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 你刚才提到你现在在俄亥俄州,正在为 fellow Democrats 拉票。距离中期选举还有大约90天的时间。我们看了最近的昆尼皮亚克大学民调,结果显示民主党人的支持率只有2%到3%,比特朗普总统的支持率还要低。你面临很多不利因素:共和党在筹款方面比民主党更有优势,选区重划——我知道民主党说这对他们不利,但共和党也存在不公正划分选区的问题——我们看到明尼苏达州和密歇根州的党内斗争,还没有真正迹象表明民主党人能够团结起来支持一位共同的候选人。你有多担心民主党会输掉这场选举,或者最终只能以极其微弱的优势胜出?
凯利参议员: 我认为我们还是有机会的,尽管共和党在得克萨斯州开始的不公正选区划分试图操纵选举结果,让局面变得更艰难,这给他们带来了优势。但这位总统在中期选举总统中支持率处于历史低位,而且他没有满足美国民众的需求。你看,汽油价格涨到了每加仑4美元以上,一半的美国人都难以负担食品开支,房租上涨,住房拥有率下降。美国民众真的过得很艰难。所以我们有机会夺回众议院的控制权,我相信我们能做到。在参议院方面,情况很有挑战性,我不会把这说得太乐观,但我们还有90天的时间。我们在很多地方都有机会,比六个月前预想的要多。一年半以前,我会说我们没有机会夺回参议院的控制权,但因为唐纳德·特朗普为美国民众做的工作一塌糊涂,我认为我们有机会夺回参议院的控制权,这也是我为什么会在这里支持谢罗德·布朗。你知道,他2024年的选举没有成功,但他绝对有机会在2026年的俄亥俄州选举中获胜,不过这需要付出一些努力。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 让我问问明天可能发生的事情。代理国家情报局长比尔·普尔蒂表示,他将把最高职位移交给刚刚获得参议院确认的杰伊·克莱顿。民主党人的反对意见也曾是阻碍《外国情报监控法》授权通过的因素之一。我想知道,这次领导层变更后,民主党人的反对意见会不会消失?
凯利参议员: 我不能代表所有人,但对我来说会的。比尔·普尔蒂根本就不适合这个职位,他根本就不该担任这个职务。据他自己说,他解雇了大约一半的情报局长办公室工作人员。说实话,我本来就觉得那里的人太多了,但这家伙根本就不合格,他甚至都不太清楚国家情报总监办公室是做什么的。所以我很难想象他在决定解雇谁、留下谁的时候做得有多好。而且我们现在还正处于一场战争当中。所以我猜,等我们理清头绪之后,可能会发现他解雇了一大批不该解雇的人。所以希望周一他就能离开办公室,我们就能讨论《外国情报监控法》的延期问题了。
玛格丽特·布伦南: 好的,马克·凯利参议员,感谢你今天上午抽出时间接受采访。
Transcript: Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Aug. 2, 2026
2026-08-02T12:51:02-0400 / CBS News
The following is the transcript of an interview with Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona that aired on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on Aug. 2, 2026.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We turn now to Arizona Democratic Senator Mark Kelly, who joins us from Columbus, Ohio, this morning. Good morning to you, Senator.
SENATOR MARK KELLY: Good morning, Margaret.
MARGARET BRENNAN: We’re now in the sixth month of this war we had been told would last four to five weeks. In the past week, the targets have widened. Iran hit Egypt. We saw Saudi Arabia join the U.S. in bombing Iranian-backed militias there, and then late last night, President Trump used the term that he had been considering military action on levels unseen since World War II. You sit on Intelligence, you sit on Armed Services. Has the administration shared anything in regard to its plans on Iran?
SEN. KELLY: I mean, not these latest plans, and I think what we’re seeing here is a president who has an approach to this that’s just rather erratic. He says one thing, he does another thing. It’s escalatory. At this point, he’s trying to get us back to February, and I think if he could, he would. If he had a big reset button he could hit, he would certainly take that option. Hey, we’ve got 18 dead Americans. Prices have skyrocketed across the country for the American people. I was here in Ohio- I’m here in Ohio now, but I met with some veterans the other day, and they’re struggling. I mean, these are a lot of retired service members that can’t afford to put gas in their car, can’t afford groceries. Rent is going up, and this president is not dealing with the issues that the American people need him to deal with.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, you know, in our polling, we see that this is a very unpopular war, and it’s weighing on the president’s own approval ratings. But Democrats are faring slightly worse. According to CBS polling, when asked who has the better approach to Iran, 32% say Trump and the GOP. Only 30% say the Democrats. So we are in this thing. Do Democrats need to offer an affirmative vision for ending it?
SEN. KELLY: Well, I don’t think it’s the president’s vision. Here’s a guy who got us into this without a strategic goal, without a plan, without a timeline. He’s got a Secretary of Defense that doesn’t know how to manage this war, who decided a good metric at the beginning was just to drop as many munitions as he could on as many targets, and now we’ve got a munitions shortage. Big surprise. So they’re flailing. They’re stuck. They’re responsible for this, and the president is the one that has to try to figure out a way out of this. I would suggest to him, though, that the solution is not to do the same thing that he’s been doing, not to have his real estate buddy and his son-in-law in charge of a negotiation, to put some people in here that know how to do this, how to talk to the Iranians, and put a coalition together, bring our allies back together. He’s alienated not only our GCC allies but our European allies as well, and it’s just making this much harder for him to figure out a way out.
MARGARET BRENNAN: But the Washington Post is reporting that the top U.S. general in Europe, General Grynkewich, warned the Pentagon that he lacks resources to protect Israel from incoming ballistic missiles, and if he’s without another Navy destroyer, he will be forced to choose between defense of the homeland versus that of Israel. It sounds like for the moment Israel’s not rejoining combat operations. But what does that say to you? Have you heard these concerns from this top commander yourself?
SEN. KELLY: I haven’t heard this specifically from Grynkewich on- on this issue, but we- it’s- it’s not- Margaret, it’s not- this isn’t rocket science. It’s not hard to figure out. I mean, we- we struck over 14,000 targets with multiple munitions. That- that is- puts a lot of stress on the magazine depth. So of course, our commanders, probably not only in Europe but in other places are starting to feel some stress on can they meet the need if they need to defend the homeland or our allies. You can see why this is an issue for him, and that’s because at the beginning of this thing there was no strategic goal, and without the goal, it’s hard to figure out what to do next.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.
SEN. KELLY: And I think that’s why, that you know, that’s why Hegseth went just to try to set records on the number of targets hit.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah, I should say for the record that the Pentagon says it’s media speculation, and they don’t comment on operational capabilities. We did ask them to clarify that. But on the point about restocking, Secretary Hegseth says he needs money from Congress to do that to replenish munitions. He needs money from Congress to pay salaries. He needs $67 billion. You recently were asked, and you said you were undecided on how you would vote on additional funding. How do you deny that needed funding?
SEN. KELLY: Well, Margaret, last year we passed a defense budget that was over a trillion dollars. That was the first time ever. It was sold to us as a one-time generational investment in the department, and in my view, they squandered that. Now they’re coming and they’re asking for $1.5 trillion, plus a supplemental. We’re gonna- we’re approaching the amount of money that every other country on the planet spends on defense in a year. This is irresponsible, and now they want a blank check. Hey, I’m going to make sure the troops have what they need to defend themselves and defend the United States–
MARGARET BRENNAN: — So you would vote for the 67?–
SEN. KELLY: –but they need to come to us– no, not- no, not necessarily. They need to come to us with a reasonable approach here. The $1.5 trillion, you know that has systems that I am very confident aren’t going to work. They’re still working on space-based interceptors for ICBMs. The physics on this is really very, very challenging. It’s not going to make us safer. The other systems that we don’t need. They- they need to understand that we do not have unlimited resources in this country. We’ve got 39 and a half trillion dollars in debt, and the defense budget that they’re requesting is twice what it was when I got to the United States Senate in 2021. It’s twice that budget.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, you mentioned that you’re in Ohio right now, and you were campaigning for fellow Democrats there. We’re about 90 days out from the midterms. We looked at some recent Quinnipiac polling. It showed Democrats have a 23%- two, three percent- approval rating, worse than President Trump’s approval. You’ve got a lot of headwinds. Republicans have an advantage in terms of fund- over Democrats in terms of funding. There’s redistricting that I know Democrats say disadvantages them, though they’ve also gerrymandered. We see interparty fighting in Minnesota and in Michigan with no real promise to unify Democrats over a- a common candidate here. How concerned are you that- that Democrats are going to lose this thing or- or end up with this very, very tight race?
SEN. KELLY: Well, I think we have an opportunity here, despite the Republican gerrymandering that started in- in the state of Texas, to try to you know rig the- the deck, so to say here, and make it more challenging. That- that provides an advantage to them. But this president is historically unpopular for a midterm president, and he’s not meeting the needs of the American people. You know, gas is up over $4 a gallon. Half of Americans are having a hard time affording food, rent, home ownership is down. Rent is up. The American people are really struggling. So we have an opportunity to win back the House, and I am confident we will. On the Senate side, it’s challenging. I’m not gonna- I’m not gonna paint this as a rosy picture, but we’ve got 90 days to go. We have opportunities in a lot of different places, more than we thought we had six months ago. And a year and a half ago, I would say we had no opportunity to win back the Senate. But because of the horrible job that Donald Trump has done for the American people, I think we have a chance we could win back control of the Senate, and that’s why I’m here supporting Sherrod Brown. You know, he- he- he wasn’t successful in 2024. He could definitely win here in 2026, but it’s going to take some effort.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Let me ask you about what may happen tomorrow. Bill Pulte, who is the acting director of National Intelligence, has said that he is going to hand over the top job to the man who was just confirmed by the Senate, Jay Clayton. Democratic objection had been one of the holdups as well in getting that FISA authority passed. I’m wondering, once you see this change of command, are those Democratic objections going to melt away?
SEN. KELLY: I can’t speak for everybody, but for me they will. Bill Pulte was not qualified in any way for this job; should have never had it. He fired, according to him, about half of the director’s office. And hey, I, you know, thought there were too many people over there anyway. But this guy was not qualified. Didn’t even really understand what the Office of National Intelligence did. So I can’t imagine he did a very good job at figuring out who to let go and who to keep. And because we’re also in the middle of a war right now. So I suspect in fact, when we- when we sort this out, we’re gonna probably realize that he fired a bunch of the wrong people. So, hopefully on Monday he is out of the office and we can talk about FISA renewal.
MARGARET BRENNAN: All right, Senator Mark Kelly, thank you for your time this morning.
发表回复