2026年6月16日 美国东部时间上午9:37 / 福克斯新闻
图恩称“必须有人”向参议员通报情况，与此同时J·D·万斯开展媒体宣传，概述60天时间表
作者：亚历克斯·米勒，福克斯新闻
伊朗与特朗普均对签署和平协议持乐观态度
唐纳德·特朗普总统抨击了潜在伊朗协议条款的泄露，但双方似乎都对达成协议持谨慎乐观态度。批评人士同意拭目以待。
NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章！
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/65b543be-bb42-4ceb-aef4-a1e700b025ad
收听本文
4 分钟
唐纳德·特朗普总统已就结束伊朗战争达成初步协议，但国会尚未看到协议内容，共和党人希望在提供支持前了解细节。
特朗普宣称协议已由所有各方签署，但包括参议院多数党领袖、南达科他州共和党人约翰·图恩在内的参议员仍不清楚协议具体内容。图恩是“八人帮”成员，可接收政府的顶级情报简报。
“我认为即使是在这里密切关注此事的人也不太了解，”图恩说道。
特朗普再次称协议即将达成，随后确认与伊朗达成最后一刻协议，但细节仍保密
唐纳德·特朗普总统已与伊朗达成协议，政府称协议已签署，但国会尚未看到内容，议员们希望在支持前了解细节。（奇普·索莫德维拉/盖蒂图片社；亚伦·施瓦茨/法新社 via 盖蒂图片社；比尔·克拉克/CQ-滚呼公司 via 盖蒂图片社）
在国会等待有关这一期待已久的协议的信息之际，副总统J·D·万斯周一大部分时间都在开展媒体宣传，概述协议的大致内容。当被问及万斯是否应就此向参议员通报情况时，图恩表示：“必须有人这么做。”
“我不知道是不是副总统，但可以肯定的是，我们的议员们会有很多疑问，”图恩说道。
还有一个与伊朗相关的信任问题，即伊朗是否会遵守已达成的任何协议。
“历史表明，掌控伊朗的宗教狂热分子撒谎成性，”路易斯安那州共和党参议员约翰·肯尼迪说道。
伊朗长期的欺骗行径加剧了对新核协议的怀疑，谈判仍在继续
视频：坎塔·艾哈迈德：美伊协议是“为开始谈判而达成的协议”
万斯的媒体宣传活动确实概述了大致时间表：从协议初步签署起约60天，以便就永久结束伊朗核计划进行进一步谈判。
但也有批评者，包括前总统巴拉克·奥巴马，他在接受《早安美国》采访时表示，他“怀疑”特朗普的协议会与他2015年与伊朗达成的协议有何不同。
万斯在哥伦比亚广播公司新闻节目中反驳称，奥巴马的协议“让伊朗的核计划加速发展，本质上是贿赂伊朗人让他们停止该计划”。不过，万斯证实，如果伊朗遵守即将达成的协议的约束条款，将有3000亿美元的重建基金可供伊朗使用。
特朗普和万斯都表示，协议细节将在未来几天公布，可能会在周五于瑞士举行的正式签署仪式上公布。但对一些人来说这还不够。
“我们数十次被告知这场战争已经结束，却数十次感到失望，”参议院少数党领袖、纽约州民主党人查克·舒默说道。“政府内部不同人士的说法不一致。在这些高风险谈判中，细节决定成败，但特朗普甚至都没有透露他与伊朗达成的‘谅解’的文本。”
J·D·万斯透露美伊协议细节，回应纳税人资金是否会流向德黑兰的问题
副总统J·D·万斯2026年6月15日在纽约市福克斯新闻频道工作室与主持人肖恩·汉尼蒂一同参加《汉尼蒂》节目。（罗·罗奇林/盖蒂图片社）
当被问及政府为何未向议员透露协议内容时，一名白宫官员表示：“我们将继续保持我们与国会山之间非同寻常的透明历史，正如我们在整个冲突过程中所做的那样。”
当被问及是否会将最终协议提交给国会时，特朗普在与阿联酋总统谢赫·穆罕默德·本·扎耶德·阿勒纳哈扬会晤时表示：“我之前从未想过这个问题，但我会提交的，我不介意，”随后他将这个想法作为对民主党人的挑战。
“我之前从未想过，甚至从未考虑过，但我会把它提交给国会，”特朗普说道。“我喜欢这个主意。我的意思是，谁会反对呢？让他们看看——让他们拥有核武器吧。民主党人会说，‘哦，他们应该拥有核武器。’他们会抓狂的。我喜欢这个主意。”
虽然共和党人不确定协议的具体细节，但许多人表示，他们希望对最终协议进行投票，以确保协议是永久性的，不会重蹈前总统巴拉克·奥巴马与伊朗达成的《联合全面行动计划》（JCPOA）的覆辙，特朗普在第一任期内就废除了该协议。
“一旦我们拿到最终协议，我们需要对其进行审查并通过，”俄克拉荷马州共和党参议员詹姆斯·兰克福德说道。“唯一能持久的方式——行政协议仅在本届政府任期内有效——你想要的是长期协议。它必须成为法律。”
兰克福德结合对特朗普的了解来解读该协议，并表示：“特朗普总统……在处理这类事情时相当不拘一格。”
点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP
“我不认为他会达成糟糕的协议。这会是我想要的一切吗？可能不会。否则伊朗永远也不会签署，”他说道。“但我不认为他会在这件事上做出过多让步。”
与此同时，尽管国会大部分议员都被蒙在鼓里，但参议院外交关系委员会主席、爱达荷州共和党人詹姆斯·里施可能对协议有所了解。
当被问及是否已获悉政府与伊朗的协议内容时，里施表示：“是的，我已经获悉了。”
“目前我不予置评。这仍在推进中，”里施说道。“我们很快就会讨论此事。”
亚历克斯·米勒是福克斯新闻数字频道记者，负责报道美国参议院事务。
Trump’s Iran deal sparks GOP demands for vote as Congress remains in the dark
June 16, 2026 9:37am EDT / Fox News
Thune says ‘somebody will need to’ brief senators as JD Vance conducts media blitz outlining a 60-day timeline
By Alex Miller, Fox News
Iran and Trump appear optimistic about signing a peace deal
President Donald Trump slammed the leak of the terms of a potential deal with Iran, but both sides appeared to be cautiously hopeful about signing an agreement. Critics agreed to wait and see.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
blob:https://www.foxnews.com/65b543be-bb42-4ceb-aef4-a1e700b025ad
Listen to this article
4 min
President Donald Trump has the beginnings of an agreement to end the war in Iran, but Congress hasn’t seen it, and Republicans want details before lending their support.
Trump declared that the deal had already been signed by all parties, but senators, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., who is a member of the Gang of Eight who receives top-level intelligence briefings from the administration, are still in the dark about what exactly it entails.
“I don’t think even the people who follow this stuff closely up here know much about it,” Thune said.
TRUMP AGAIN SAYS DEAL IS CLOSE, THEN CONFIRMS A LAST-MINUTE AGREEMENT WITH IRAN, BUT DETAILS STILL SECRET
President Donald Trump has a deal with Iran the administration says has already been signed, but Congress hasn’t seen it, and lawmakers want details before they back it.(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images; Aaron Schwartz/AFP via Getty Images; Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)
As Congress awaits information on the long-awaited deal, Vice President JD Vance went on a media blitz for much of Monday to provide rough sketches of what’s inside. When asked if Vance should brief senators on the matter, Thune said, “Somebody will need to.”
“I don’t know whether it’s the vice president, but for sure, our members are gonna have a lot of questions about it,” Thune said.
There’s also an issue of trust with Iran and whether it will follow through with whatever has been agreed to.
“History shows that the religious zealots running Iran lie like fish swim,” Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said.
IRAN’S LONG TRAIL OF DECEPTION FUELS SKEPTICISM OVER NEW NUCLEAR DEAL AS TALKS CONTINUE
Video: Qanta Ahmed: US-Iran deal is ‘a deal to begin negotiating a deal’
Vance’s media tour did outline a rough timeline of about 60 days from the initial signing of the deal to allow for further negotiations on a permanent end to Iran’s nuclear program.
But there are critics, including former President Barack Obama, who told “Good Morning America” that he was “doubtful” Trump’s deal would be different from his own agreement with Iran in 2015.
Vance shot back on CBS News that Obama’s deal “took an Iranian nuclear program that it accelerated, and it basically bribed the Iranians to stop that program.” However, Vance confirmed that there would be a $300 billion reconstruction fund available to Iran if it stayed in line with the guardrails of a forthcoming agreement.
Trump and Vance have both said that details of the deal would emerge in the coming days, likely during an official signing ceremony on Friday in Switzerland. But that’s not good enough for some.
“We’ve been told dozens of times that this war is over, and dozens of times we’ve been disappointed,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said. “There have been divergent statements from a variety of people in the administration. In these high-stakes negotiations, the devil is in the details, but Trump still hasn’t even revealed the text of his ‘understanding’ with Iran.”
JD VANCE REVEALS DETAILS OF US-IRAN DEAL, ADDRESSES WHETHER TAXPAYER MONEY WILL GO TO TEHRAN
Vice President JD Vance visits the show “Hannity” with host Sean Hannity at Fox News Channel Studios on June 15, 2026, in New York City.(Roy Rochlin/Getty Images)
When asked why the administration had not revealed the contents of the deal to lawmakers, a White House official said, “We will continue our long history of extraordinary levels of transparency with the Hill, as we maintained throughout the course of this conflict.”
And Trump, when asked during a meeting with the United Arab Emirates President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan if he would send the final deal to Congress, said “I never thought of it, but I would, I wouldn’t mind,” then posed the notion as a challenge to Democrats.
“I never thought about it. Never even thought about it, but I will send it to Congress,” Trump said. “I like the idea. I mean, who wouldn’t approve it? Let’s let’s let them have a nuclear weapon. The Democrats will say, ‘oh, they should have a nuclear weapon.’ They’ll go crazy. I like the idea.”
While Republicans weren’t sure of the specifics of the deal, many said that they wanted a vote on a final product to ensure that it was permanent and wouldn’t end up like former President Barack Obama’s Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) with Iran, which Trump ripped up during his first term.
“Once we have a final agreement, we need to check it out and pass it,” Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., said. “The only way it’s lasting — executive agreements last through the executive — you want a long-term agreement. It’s gotta be law.”
Lankford leaned into the Trump factor in his understanding of the deal and contended, “President Trump … is pretty unconventional the way he does this kind of stuff.”
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“I don’t foresee him going to go make a bad deal in things. Is it gonna be everything I want? Probably not. Or Iran would never, ever sign it,” he said. “But I don’t see him giving away the farm on this.”
Meanwhile, while much of Congress is in the dark, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair James Risch, R-Idaho, may have some insight into the deal.
When asked if he had been read into the administration’s agreement with Iran, Risch said, “I do. I have.”
“I don’t have any comment on it at this point. It’s still a work in progress,” Risch said. “We’ll get to that here pretty quick.”
Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.