分类: 未分类

  • 舍伍德森林里那棵与罗宾汉传说相关的1200岁橡树已死亡,保护组织称:“对所有人来说都令人心碎”


    2026-06-18T07:24:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    一棵与罗宾汉传说紧密相关的巨型古树可能因游客过度喜爱而“死亡”。

    英国皇家鸟类保护协会周四表示,这棵位于舍伍德森林、已有1200年树龄的“大橡树”今年春天未长出新叶,据此可确认其已死亡。

    该环保组织称,尽管这棵巨型橡树周围的区域已用围栏隔开,但过去两个世纪以来,前来观赏它扭曲枝干和茂密树冠的游客在诺丁汉当地踩踏了土壤,导致雨水难以渗入树根。

    多年来,这片森林一直面临威胁,这棵树过去也曾被传死亡,但该组织后来证实它仍存活。

    但这次情况不同了。

    “这棵树今年未能长出新叶,对所有人来说都令人心碎,”英国皇家鸟类保护协会的霍莉·德雷克在宣布橡树死亡的声明中说道。


    image
    2007年10月19日在英格兰诺丁汉郡拍摄的“大橡树”,传说中罗宾汉曾在此藏身。美联社/西蒙·道森

    据说这棵树曾为传奇13世纪绿林好汉罗宾汉提供庇护——他劫富济贫,在被诺丁汉郡长追捕时藏身于这片森林。

    1790年,海曼·鲁克少校在一本关于橡树的书中提及这棵树,此后首批游客蜂拥而至,它也因此得名“大橡树”。

    目前无法确定这棵树的具体死因,但数百万游客的踩踏是其衰落的原因之一,此外还有用钢缆和支架加固其巨大枝干的干预措施。导致其死亡的原因还有气候变化带来的热浪和干旱。

    树木专家发现,其根系被挤压窒息且营养不良。

    “像大橡树这样的古树是英国的‘保护级白犀牛’,但它们的衰落却远不那么引人注目,”伍德兰信托基金的埃德·派恩说道,“保护它们对我们所处世界的健康至关重要,然而大多数古树都在悄无声息中消失,没有获得像大橡树这样的关注或照料。”

    除了在民间传说中的地位,这片森林还因出产木材闻名:18世纪末至19世纪初,舍伍德橡树为副海军上将霍雷肖·纳尔逊的皇家海军舰船提供了木材,其木材还被用于伦敦圣保罗大教堂的屋顶建造。

    大橡树幸免于砍伐,自20世纪70年代以来一直受到围栏保护。


    image
    2013年6月30日资料照片,一名男孩站在英格兰舍伍德森林大橡树的围栏上。哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    英国皇家鸟类保护协会表示:“尽管这标志着大橡树作为活树的生命走到了尽头,但这并不意味着它的故事就此终结。”

    “这棵树及其下方的土壤将继续成为野生动物的重要庇护所,我们在照料大橡树过程中获得的知识,将有助于保护全国其他的古老橡树,”该组织说道,“通过与合作伙伴制定相关计划,它的遗产将通过其幼苗和与之相关的传说延续下去,这棵树在死后也将继续成为野生动物的重要庇护所。”

    德雷克表示,这棵树将成为人们可以参观的纪念物,“它将活在罗宾汉的传说中,并在死后继续为森林生态系统提供与生前同等的支持。”

    1,200-year-old Robin Hood oak tree in Sherwood Forest has died, group says: “Heartbreaking for everyone”

    2026-06-18T07:24:00-0400 / CBS News

    A massive ancient oak tree linked to the legend of Robin Hood may have been loved to death.

    The 1,200-year-old Major Oak in Sherwood Forest is believed to have died after it didn’t sprout leaves this spring, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds said Thursday.

    Visitors over the past two centuries who viewed the tree’s gnarled limbs and sprawling canopy in Nottingham compressed the soil, making it difficult for rain to reach its roots, the conservation group said, despite the immediate area around the massive oak being fenced off.

    The forest has been under threat for years and the tree had been rumored to have died in the past — only to have the group confirm it was still alive.

    That is no longer the case.

    “The tree’s failure to produce leaves this year is heartbreaking for everyone,” Hollie Drake of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds said in a statement announcing the death.

    The “Major Oak” tree, where Robin Hood allegedly used as a hide out in Sherwood Forest, is seen in Nottinghamshire, England, Oct. 19, 2007. AP/SIMON DAWSON

    The tree is said to have sheltered Robin Hood, the legendary 13th-century bandit who stole from the rich and gave to the poor and took refuge in the forest when being pursued by the sheriff of Nottingham.

    It got its name after being mentioned in a book on oak trees by Major Hayman Rooke in 1790 that led to the first wave of fans who flocked to the forest.

    It’s impossible to say what killed the tree, but the footprints of millions contributed to its downfall, along with intervention to shore up its massive limbs using cables and poles. Climate change that has brought heat waves and drought was also blamed.

    Tree experts found the root system strangled and starved.

    “Ancient trees like the Major Oak are the ‘conservation white rhinos of the U.K.’ but their decline is far less visible,” said Ed Pyne, of the Woodland Trust. “Saving them is vital to the health of the world we live in and yet most disappear quietly, without the recognition or care given to the Major Oak.”

    In addition to its place in folklore, the forest is known for Sherwood oaks that floated the ships of Vice Admiral Horatio Nelson’s Royal Navy in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, and as timbers in the roof of St. Paul’s Cathedral in London.

    The Major Oak was spared from the saw and had been protected by a fence since the 1970s.

    A boy stands on the fence surrounding the Major Oak in Sherwood Forest, England, in a June 30, 2013 file photo. CBS News

    “Although this marks the end of the Major Oak as a living tree, it does not mark the end of its story,” the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds said.

    “The tree and soil beneath it will continue to be a vital refuge for wildlife and the knowledge we have gained by looking after the Major Oak will help preserve other ancient oaks across the country,” the group said. “Its legacy will live on through its saplings and the legends associated with it, with plans being drawn up with our partners, and the tree will continue to be a vital refuge for wildlife.”

    Drake said the tree will be a monument that people can visit, “living on in the legend of Robin Hood and continuing to provide as much support to the forest’s ecosystem in death as in life.”

  • 独家报道:特朗普政府加大力度剥夺归化美国公民的国籍


    2026-06-18T08:00:25.491Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    • 特朗普政府计划在10月前提起至少250起剥夺国籍诉讼,这是其取消公民身份行动的大幅升级。
    • 司法部在不到两个月的时间里已经提起了29起相关诉讼,远超每年不足10起的年均数量。
    • 民事诉讼律师已从其他部门抽调,专门处理针对被指控存在欺诈或犯罪行为的归化公民的案件。

    本文由AI生成摘要,经CNN编辑审核。

    据司法部一名高级官员透露,特朗普政府计划在10月前提起至少250起剥夺国籍诉讼,大幅强化其取消归化美国公民国籍的行动。

    今年不到两个月的时间里,司法部就已提起29起针对外籍裔美国人的剥夺国籍诉讼,指控他们通过欺诈手段获取美国公民身份。

    根据锡拉丘兹大学交易记录获取清算所的数据,2008年至2026年6月12日期间,美国共提起166起剥夺国籍诉讼,年均不足10起。目前司法部的办案速度已远超往年,民事诉讼律师正在积极审查更多案件以提起诉讼。

    此次行动是唐纳德·特朗普总统更广泛、激进的移民议程的一部分——该议程早已超越了针对非法入境者的范畴——也揭示了联邦机构如何调整资源以优先推进该议程。

    据这位司法部高级官员透露,在幕后,司法部已从多个部门抽调民事诉讼律师——包括负责调查欺诈案件的人员,而政府曾将欺诈调查标榜为另一项首要任务——来处理剥夺国籍诉讼。与此同时,许多美国检察官办公室早已承受巨大压力,相关案件正被分派至这些办公室。

    “这是国会数十年来写入法律的合法手段,”这位司法部高级官员告诉CNN,并补充道,剥夺国籍诉讼应被优先处理,“以保护美国公民身份的完整性,确保那些身处美国并享受公民福利的人是依法获得公民身份的,确保合适的人群才能获取公民身份。”

    特朗普政府目前提起的案件涉及被指控在归化申请过程中或此前存在欺诈行为、猥亵未成年人或支持恐怖主义的人员。

    根据联邦法规,如果个人在归化申请过程中作出与申请相关的虚假陈述,或通过非法手段获取公民身份——即他们本不具备申请资格——联邦政府有权撤销其公民身份。剥夺国籍诉讼通常属于上述两类之一,随后将根据具体情况以民事或刑事案件形式推进。

    剥夺国籍程序不适用于在美国出生、凭借出生权获得公民身份的人群。(另外,特朗普曾试图通过行政命令终止自动出生权公民身份,美国最高法院即将对该政策举措的合法性作出裁决。)

    根据美国公民及移民服务局的数据,过去十年里,近800万人成为归化美国公民。

    司法部助理部长布雷特·舒梅特2025年6月的一份备忘录显示,政府已表明将优先处理剥夺国籍案件。舒梅特列出了10类优先案件,包括对国家安全构成威胁的人员、犯下战争罪的人员、存在欺诈行为的人员,以及在归化申请过程中未披露重罪的人员等。

    “这些分类旨在指导民事 division 优先处理哪些案件;不过,这些分类并未限制民事 division 追究任何特定案件,也未按重要性排序,”备忘录中写道。

    剥夺国籍专案组由12名律师组成,他们正在处理积压案件,并持续接收国土安全部转来的案件。这位司法部高级官员表示,积压案件包括身份欺诈案件、前科案件、战争罪案件和恐怖主义案件。

    不过,鉴于案件数量庞大,司法部正从民事 division 的其他办公室抽调人员,包括民事欺诈律师、办公室前线的政治任命官员以及其他律师,以扩大办案能力。

    与此同时,美国检察官办公室也在接收案件,并根据案件的起诉地点将其分派至全国各地。这位司法部高级官员表示,美国检察官办公室可能还会提起“数百起更多”的案件。

    此类案件工作量大且耗时,这也是历届政府在很大程度上仅专注于战争罪和恐怖主义相关人员的部分原因。

    例如,拜登政府四年间总共仅提起了24起相关案件,据司法部数据显示。

    “他们或许能够加快案件提起的流程,但无论在立案前采取何种步骤,诉讼程序本身仍将是他们大规模剥夺公民身份目标的巨大阻碍,”曾在多届政府时期任职于司法部、现为正义联系组织创始人兼执行董事的斯泰西·杨说道。

    剥夺国籍的情况极为罕见,且仅能在联邦法院进行。历史上,美国曾出于多种理由撤销公民身份,包括谎报入境日期、年龄或婚姻状况,以及政治原因。例如,二战期间,美国对亲纳粹的德裔美国人的归化案件进行了审查。

    据熟悉此类案件的人士告诉CNN,司法部的律师此前曾将工作重点放在那些被认定犯下严重罪行的人员身上,这使得他们提交给法院的案件更为明确。不过如今,一些司法部律师感受到越来越大的压力,需要依据法律追究任何可被论证的案件——哪怕是基于文件填写方式的所谓欺诈行为,这些人士说道。

    司法部官员坚称,该机构的工作重点是那些在申请美国公民身份时谎报犯罪记录或在申请期间持续实施犯罪行为的人员。

    “收到停车罚单的人——不会成为我们投入资源关注的对象,甚至可能都不符合法律规定的剥夺国籍条件,”这位司法部高级官员表示。“我们真正关注的是那些对美国实施严重欺诈的人员,找出这些个体并尽快推进程序。”

    “获得美国公民身份是一项特权,在特朗普总统的坚定领导下,司法部对滥用这一程序的行为采取零容忍政策,”代理司法部长托德·布兰奇在6月的一份声明中说道。

    如果政府在剥夺国籍诉讼中胜诉,该人员将恢复获得美国公民身份之前的移民身份。通常情况下,他们会恢复永久居民身份,不过根据剥夺国籍的具体原因,他们也可能面临驱逐出境程序。

    “之所以有如此完善的保护措施,之所以采用清晰且令人信服的证据标准,等等,都是源于最高法院的判例,”波士顿学院法学院教授丹尼尔·坎斯特鲁姆说道。

    坎斯特鲁姆指出,政府对剥夺国籍案件的重视“可能令人担忧”,但目前尚未到引发警觉的地步,因为目前已提起的案件总体上符合历届政府曾追究的案件类型。

    CNN的汉娜·拉比诺维茨为本报道作出了贡献。

    Exclusive: Trump administration ramps up effort to revoke citizenship from naturalized Americans

    2026-06-18T08:00:25.491Z / CNN

    • The Trump administration plans to file at least 250 denaturalization cases by October, a significant increase in efforts to revoke citizenship.
    • The Justice Department has already filed 29 cases in less than two months, far exceeding the annual average of less than 10.
    • Civil litigators have been pulled from other divisions to pursue these cases targeting naturalized citizens accused of fraud or crimes.

    AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.

    The Trump administration plans to file at least 250 denaturalization cases by October, significantly intensifying its effort to revoke citizenship from people naturalized in the United States, according to a senior Justice Department official.

    In less than two months this year, the Justice Department has filed 29 denaturalization cases targeting foreign-born Americans whom it accuses of fraudulently obtaining US citizenship.

    Civil litigators are actively reviewing additional cases to file as the department picks up a pace that has already surpassed previous years: Between 2008 and June 12, 2026, 166 denaturalization complaints were filed, an annual average of less than 10, according to Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse.

    The push is part of President Donald Trump’s broader, aggressive immigration agenda — which has gone well beyond targeting people in the country illegally — and reveals how federal agencies have shifted resources to prioritize that agenda.

    Behind the scenes, the Justice Department has pulled civil litigators from various divisions — including those assigned to investigating fraud, which the administration has flaunted as another top priority — to pursue denaturalization cases, according to the senior DOJ official. The cases are also being sent to US attorney offices at a time when many are already under immense strain.

    “This is a lawful tool that Congress has had on the books for decades,” the senior DOJ official told CNN, adding that denaturalization cases should be prioritized “to protect the integrity of American citizenship and make sure people who are present in this country and have enjoyed the benefits of citizenship are doing so lawfully, and the right people are acquiring citizenship.”

    The cases filed by the Trump administration so far include people who are accused of committing fraud, sexual abuse of a minor, or expressed support for terrorism before or during the naturalization process.

    The federal government has the authority in federal statute to move toward revoking citizenship of an individual if they made false statements that were relevant to the naturalization process or if the citizenship was illegally procured, meaning they weren’t eligible for it. Denaturalization cases generally fall under one of those categories and then proceed as civil or criminal cases depending on the circumstances.

    Denaturalizations do not apply to those who were born in the country and received citizenship through birthright. (Separately, Trump has attempted, via executive order, to end automatic birthright citizenship. The Supreme Court will soon rule on whether that policy move is legal.)

    In the last decade, nearly 8 million people became naturalized US citizens, according to US Citizenship and Immigration Services.

    The administration signaled its intent to prioritize denaturalizations in a June 2025 memo from Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate. Shumate listed 10 categories of priorities for cases, including individuals who pose a danger to national security, engaged in war crimes, engaged in fraud, or committed felonies not disclosed during the naturalization process, among others.

    “These categories are intended to guide the Civil Division in prioritizing which cases to pursue; however, these categories do not limit the Civil Division from pursuing any particular case, nor are they listed in a particular order of importance,” the memo reads.

    The denaturalization unit is made up of 12 attorneys who are working through a backlog of cases and continuing to field referrals from the Department of Homeland Security. The backlog includes identity fraud cases, as well as prior conviction cases, war criminal cases, and terrorism cases, the senior DOJ official said.

    Given the volume, however, the Justice Department is pulling from other offices in its civil division, including civil fraud attorneys, political appointees in the front office, among other attorneys to expand capacity.

    US attorney offices, meanwhile, are also being referred cases and distributing those around the country depending on where the case will be filed. The senior DOJ official said US attorney offices may file “several hundred more” cases.

    The cases are intensive and time-consuming, which is partly why previous administrations have largely focused on people involved in war crimes and terrorism.

    The Biden administration, for example, filed a total of 24 cases over four years, according to the Justice Department.

    “They may be able to expedite the process for initiating these cases, but regardless of the steps they take before cases are filed, the litigation process itself is still going to be a huge impediment to their goal of denaturalizing people in huge numbers,” said Stacey Young, who served at DOJ under multiple administrations and is the founder and executive director of Justice Connection.

    Denaturalization is rare and can only occur in federal court. Historically, the US revoked citizenship for a range of reasons, from lying about a person’s date of arrival, age or marital status to political reasons. During World War II, for example, the US reviewed naturalization cases of German Americans who were pro-Nazi.

    Lawyers in the Justice Department had previously focused their efforts on people who had been found guilty of egregious crimes, making the cases they’d bring to court more clear cut, people familiar with these cases told CNN. These days, though, some Justice Department lawyers are feeling a building pressure to pursue any case that can be argued under the law — even alleged fraud based on how paperwork was filled out, the people told CNN.

    Justice Department officials maintain that the agency is focusing on people who lied about criminal history or criminal acts that were ongoing when they applied for US citizenship.

    “People who got a parking ticket — that’s not going to be somebody that we’re going to focus our resources on and may not even qualify for denaturalization under the statute,” the senior DOJ official said. “It’s really about finding people who have committed serious fraud against the United States and identifying those individuals and proceeding as quickly as we can.”

    “Gaining U.S. citizenship is a privilege and under the steadfast leadership of President Trump, this Department of Justice maintains a zero-tolerance policy for the abuse of this process,” said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche in a June statement.

    If the administration succeeds in a denaturalization case, that person will return to the immigration status they had prior to acquiring US citizenship. Generally, they usually return to their permanent resident status, though depending on the reasons for their denaturalization, they could also face deportation proceedings.

    “The reason for the robustness of the protections, the reason the standard is clear and convincing evidence, etc. is because of Supreme Court decisions,” said Daniel Kanstroom, professor of law at Boston College Law School.

    Kanstroom noted that the emphasis on denaturalizations by the administration is “potentially worrisome” but not currently cause for alarm, since the cases filed so far generally fit the type of cases previous administrations have pursued.

    CNN’s Hannah Rabinowitz contributed to this report.

  • 美国审查驻欧部队 促北约朝欧洲主导迈进


    2026年6月18日 18:21 / 联合早报

    赫格塞斯星期四(6月18日)在布鲁塞尔的北约国防部长会议上,对北约盟友采取严厉措辞,但也承认许多北约成员国在加强防务方面取得长足进步。(路透社)

    美国战争部长赫格塞斯说,五角大楼会在未来六个月内对驻欧部队进行审查,确保北约“在迅速且不可逆转地朝欧洲主导的方向迈进”。

    法新社报道,赫格塞斯星期四(6月18日)在布鲁塞尔的北约国防部长会议上,发表上述言论。华盛顿此前一直在施压欧洲盟国,为自身安全承担更大责任。

    赫格塞斯表明:“这会是一次真正的审查,目的是确保北约正迅速、不可逆转地朝着欧洲主导的方向迈进,并承担起捍卫欧洲的主要责任。”

    北约领导人会议即将在7月召开,美国正不断加大施压力度,力求确保盟国兑现大幅增加国防开支的承诺。

    赫格塞斯强调,今后华盛顿支付用于覆盖北约组织运营成本的会费将取决于盟国是否达到开支目标。

    美国2026年的北约会费约为7亿9000万美元(约10亿新元),赫格塞斯说:“如果其他盟国不紧急增加军费,我们的会费缴纳额就会相应减少。”

    此外,伊朗战争期间,一些北约国家拒绝为美国对伊朗的军事行动提供便利和协助,此举招致美国总统特朗普不满。

    赫格塞斯说,这次审查也旨在确保美国的“准入、驻军和飞越权得到明确界定和保障”。

    “太可耻了。这些盟友让美国的儿女——我们的儿女——置身于危险之中。没有任何借口能够为此开脱。”

    尽管措辞严厉,赫格塞斯还是承认,许多北约成员国在加强防务方面取得进步。

    “一些盟友已经领会我们的意思并采取行动。你们自己心里清楚,我们对此深表感谢。”

    美国审查驻欧部队 促北约朝欧洲主导迈进

    2026年6月18日 18:21 / 联合早报

    赫格塞斯星期四(6月18日)在布鲁塞尔的北约国防部长会议上,对北约盟友采取严厉措辞,但也承认许多北约成员国在加强防务方面取得长足进步。 (路透社)

    美国战争部长赫格塞斯说,五角大楼会在未来六个月内对驻欧部队进行审查,确保北约“在迅速且不可逆转地朝欧洲主导的方向迈进”。

    法新社报道,赫格塞斯星期四(6月18日)在布鲁塞尔的北约国防部长会议上,发表上述言论。华盛顿此前一直在施压欧洲盟国,为自身安全承担更大责任。

    赫格塞斯表明:“这会是一次真正的审查,目的是确保北约正迅速、不可逆转地朝着欧洲主导的方向迈进,并承担起捍卫欧洲的主要责任。”

    北约领导人会议即将在7月召开,美国正不断加大施压力度,力求确保盟国兑现大幅增加国防开支的承诺。

    赫格塞斯强调,今后华盛顿支付用于覆盖北约组织运营成本的会费将取决于盟国是否达到开支目标。

    美国2026年的北约会费约为7亿9000万美元(约10亿新元),赫格塞斯说:“如果其他盟国不紧急增加军费,我们的会费缴纳额就会相应减少。”

    此外,伊朗战争期间,一些北约国家拒绝为美国对伊朗的军事行动提供便利和协助,此举招致美国总统特朗普不满。

    赫格塞斯说,这次审查也旨在确保美国的“准入、驻军和飞越权得到明确界定和保障”。

    “太可耻了。这些盟友让美国的儿女——我们的儿女——置身于危险之中。没有任何借口能够为此开脱。”

    尽管措辞严厉,赫格塞斯还是承认,许多北约成员国在加强防务方面取得长足进步,并称工作正在取得进展。

    “一些盟友已经领会我们的意思并采取行动。你们自己心里清楚,我们对此深表感谢。”

  • 美联储结束征询意见阶段 美国银行将全力推动资本规则调整


    2026-06-18T10:02:38.408Z / https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/us-banks-make-final-push-capital-rule-changes-fed-wraps-up-consultation-2026-06-18/

    • 银行寻求技术调整,或进一步降低部分新增资本要求
    • 四名行业官员透露,银行业计划对交易活动的资本计提提出异议
    • 大型银行还希望根据2015年以来的经济增长重新校准全球系统重要性银行附加费

    华盛顿6月18日路透电——随着美联储进入美国资本规则全面改革的最后阶段,美国大型银行周四将正式向美联储提出调整其旨在减少银行需预留的潜在损失吸收资金的提案。

    据五名行业高管和员工透露,他们的核心诉求包括削减针对华尔街交易活动的资本计提、取消针对未使用信用卡额度计提资本的要求,并进一步调整以降低针对全球互联互通银行征收的附加费的影响。这些官员因讨论未公开的监管事宜和评论信内容而选择匿名。

    通过《每日案卷》新闻简报获取最新法律资讯,直达您的收件箱,开启您的清晨。点击此处订阅

    由美联储牵头的美国监管机构于3月公布了全面资本规则的新宽松草案,据估算将使大型银行的损失吸收资本减少约4.8%,并辩称现行规则正在损害经济。这套所谓的“巴塞尔”规则全面改革了银行的风险计量方式,进而调整了其所需持有的资本规模。

    银行业认为,新提案相较于美联储2023年由民主党官员提出的原始计划有了大幅改进,后者在地区银行破产后曾设想实施20%的资本上调。

    但消息人士称,在分析了数百页的拟议技术调整方案后,银行已发现问题,并将进行最后一搏以求修正。

    银行提交正式评论的截止日期为周四。美联储发言人未回应置评请求。

    “大家都在大力推动未来六个月内完成这项工作,因为监管议程上还有其他事项,”专门从事金融监管业务的美迈斯律师事务所合伙人马修·比桑兹说道。

    放宽资本规则的批评者认为,削减银行资本要求会使银行更容易受到风险冲击,若金融机构陷入困境并限制放贷,可能会损害经济。

    上月,“更好市场”组织经济增长与金融稳定主任菲利普·巴泽尔在一份新闻声明中表示,“强劲的资本标准是银行体系韧性的基础”,因为“它们确保当风险显现时,由银行——而非纳税人、员工或小企业——承担损失”。

    交易、信用卡规则调整

    华尔街银行将辩称,监管机构在为交易活动分配资本时过于保守且一刀切,尤其是考虑到美联储每年会通过“压力测试”健康检查来评估各家银行的风险。高管们表示,行业团体将提议修改规则,大幅削减甚至完全取消美联储针对该业务提出的额外资本要求。

    银行业预计还将反对一项要求,即对被称为“无条件可撤销承诺”的10%未使用信贷额度计提资本,其中最常见的就是未使用的信用卡额度。

    目前,这类信贷额度无需计提资本,因为银行可随时撤销,但监管机构辩称,实际上在经济压力时期,出于客户关系或其他风险管理考量,银行可能不会这么做。

    少数几家大型银行还将再次推动降低美联储在2008年金融危机后对全球系统重要性银行(简称GSIB)征收的资本“附加费”。

    美联储提议进行一次性调整,以计入约2019年以来的经济增长,并为未来的增长设置自动更新机制,这将反过来降低银行相对于经济规模的占比以及由此产生的附加费。但消息人士称,银行将再次主张应计入该附加费自2015年设立以来的所有经济增长。

    不会掀起大规模反对

    银行不会像2023年那样强力反对。多名高管表示,银行已经缩减了诉求,聚焦于最关键的问题。

    据一位熟悉该计划的人士透露,一个行业团体已发现该提案存在近100个问题,但计划仅就其中数十个问题进行申辩。

    路透社此前曾报道,负责制定该规则的美联储监管事务副主席米歇尔·鲍曼曾向银行传达,要求它们在反馈时保持审慎。高管们表示,银行业也希望结束这场耗费多年时间和精力的政策争端。

    本文编辑:米歇尔·普莱斯与奥罗拉·埃利斯

    US banks to make final push on capital rule changes as Fed wraps up consultation

    2026-06-18T10:02:38.408Z / https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/us-banks-make-final-push-capital-rule-changes-fed-wraps-up-consultation-2026-06-18/

    • Banks seek technical tweaks that could further reduce some new capital hikes
    • Industry plans to challenge capital charges on trading activities, four industry officials said
    • Largest banks also want GSIB surcharge recalibrated using economic growth since 2015

    WASHINGTON, June 18 (Reuters) – Large U.S. banks on Thursday will formally pitch the central bank on tweaks to a Federal Reserve ​proposal aimed at reducing the funds they must set aside to absorb potential losses, as the central bank enters the last leg of a marathon ‌overhaul of U.S. capital rules.

    Among their top asks will be reductions to capital assigned to Wall Street trading activities, scrapping a requirement to hold capital against unused credit card lines, and further fixes to reduce the impact of a surcharge levied on globally interconnected banks, according to five industry executives and employees. The officials spoke anonymously to discuss ongoing regulatory matters and the contents of comment letters that are not ​yet public.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    U.S. regulators led by the Federal Reserve in March unveiled new relaxed drafts of sweeping capital rules, which they estimated would reduce big banks’ loss-absorbing capital by ​around 4.8%, arguing the current rules are hurting the economy. The so-called ‘Basel’ rules overhaul how banks measure their risk and in turn how much ⁠capital they need.

    Lenders believe the new proposal is a dramatic improvement from the central bank’s original 2023 plan put forward by Democratic officials keen to impose stricter bank rules, ​which had envisaged a 20% capital hike following regional bank failures.

    But after analyzing hundreds of pages of proposed technical changes, lenders have identified issues which they will make one last-ditch push to ​fix, the sources said.

    The deadline for banks to submit formal comments is Thursday. A Fed spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.

    “There’s a really big push to get it wrapped up in the next six months because there are other items on the regulatory agenda,” said Matthew Bisanz, a partner at Mayer Brown who specializes in financial regulation.

    Critics of the easier rules argue that trimming bank capital requirements ​makes the firms more vulnerable to risks, and could hurt the economy should financial firms falter and restrict lending.

    Last month, Phillip Basil, director of Economic Growth and Financial Stability ​for Better Markets, said in a press statement “strong capital standards are the foundation” of a resilient banking system, because “they ensure that banks—not taxpayers, workers, or small businesses—absorb losses when risks materialize.”

    TRADING, CREDIT CARD CHANGES

    Wall ‌Street banks ⁠will argue that regulators have been too conservative and blunt in assigning capital to trading activities, especially since the Fed annually gauges individual banks’ risks with its “stress test” health checks. Industry groups will suggest changes that could dramatically shrink or even erase the additional capital the Fed has proposed for that business, executives said.

    The banking industry is also expected to push back against a requirement to effectively hold capital against 10% of unused credit lines known as “unconditionally cancelable commitments,” the most common of which is unused credit card lines.

    Currently, such credit lines are ​capital-free because banks can yank them at any ​time, but regulators argue that in ⁠practice lenders may not do that during times of economic stress due to client relationships or other risk management practices.

    A handful of the biggest banks will also make another push to soften the capital “surcharge” the Fed imposed on global systemically important banks in the U.S., or “GSIB,” ​following the 2008 financial crisis.

    The Fed proposed a one-time adjustment to account for economic growth dating back to roughly 2019, as well ​as automatic updates for ⁠future growth, which would in turn reduce banks’ size relative to the economy and the resulting surcharge. But lenders will again argue it should account for growth since its creation in 2015, the people said.

    NO MAJOR CHALLENGE

    Banks do not plan to push back hard the way they did in 2023. Multiple executives said banks have pared back their asks, focusing on the most significant ⁠issues.

    One industry group ​identified nearly 100 issues with the proposal but plans to make the case for only a few dozen, ​according to one of the people who is familiar with the plan.

    Reuters had previously reported that Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman, who is leading the rulewriting effort, had conveyed to banks they should be measured in ​their feedback, and executives said the industry is keen to move on from a policy fight that has sucked up years of time and energy.

    Editing by Michelle Price and Aurora Ellis

  • 美国审查驻欧部队 促北约朝欧洲主导迈进


    2026年6月18日 18:21 / 联合早报

    美国审查驻欧部队 促北约朝欧洲主导迈进

    赫格塞斯星期四(6月18日)在布鲁塞尔的北约国防部长会议上,对北约盟友采取严厉措辞,但也承认许多北约成员国在加强防务方面取得长足进步。 (路透社)

    美国战争部长赫格塞斯说,五角大楼会在未来六个月内对驻欧部队进行审查,确保北约“在迅速且不可逆转地朝欧洲主导的方向迈进”。

    法新社报道,赫格塞斯星期四(6月18日)在布鲁塞尔的北约国防部长会议上,发表上述言论。华盛顿此前一直在施压欧洲盟国,为自身安全承担更大责任。

    赫格塞斯表明:“这会是一次真正的审查,目的是确保北约正迅速、不可逆转地朝着欧洲主导的方向迈进,并承担起捍卫欧洲的主要责任。”

    北约领导人会议即将在7月召开,美国正不断加大施压力度,力求确保盟国兑现大幅增加国防开支的承诺。

    赫格塞斯强调,今后华盛顿支付用于覆盖北约组织运营成本的会费将取决于盟国是否达到开支目标。

    美国2026年的北约会费约为7亿9000万美元(约10亿新元),赫格塞斯说:“如果其他盟国不紧急增加军费,我们的会费缴纳额就会相应减少。”

    此外,伊朗战争期间,一些北约国家拒绝为美国对伊朗的军事行动提供便利和协助,此举招致美国总统特朗普不满。

    赫格塞斯说,这次审查也旨在确保美国的“准入、驻军和飞越权得到明确界定和保障”。

    “太可耻了。这些盟友让美国的儿女——我们的儿女——置身于危险之中。没有任何借口能够为此开脱。”

    尽管措辞严厉,赫格塞斯还是承认,许多北约成员国在加强防务方面取得长足进步,并称工作正在取得进展。

    “一些盟友已经领会我们的意思并采取行动。你们自己心里清楚,我们对此深表感谢。”

    赫格塞斯星期四(6月18日)在布鲁塞尔的北约国防部长会议上,对北约盟友采取严厉措辞,但也承认许多北约成员国在加强防务方面取得长足进步。 (路透社)

    美国战争部长赫格塞斯说,五角大楼会在未来六个月内对驻欧部队进行审查,确保北约“在迅速且不可逆转地朝欧洲主导的方向迈进”。

    法新社报道,赫格塞斯星期四(6月18日)在布鲁塞尔的北约国防部长会议上,发表上述言论。华盛顿此前一直在施压欧洲盟国,为自身安全承担更大责任。

    赫格塞斯表明:“这会是一次真正的审查,目的是确保北约正迅速、不可逆转地朝着欧洲主导的方向迈进,并承担起捍卫欧洲的主要责任。”

    北约领导人会议即将在7月召开,美国正不断加大施压力度,力求确保盟国兑现大幅增加国防开支的承诺。

    赫格塞斯强调,今后华盛顿支付用于覆盖北约组织运营成本的会费将取决于盟国是否达到开支目标。

    美国2026年的北约会费约为7亿9000万美元(约10亿新元),赫格塞斯说:“如果其他盟国不紧急增加军费,我们的会费缴纳额就会相应减少。”

    此外,伊朗战争期间,一些北约国家拒绝为美国对伊朗的军事行动提供便利和协助,此举招致美国总统特朗普不满。

    赫格塞斯说,这次审查也旨在确保美国的“准入、驻军和飞越权得到明确界定和保障”。

    “太可耻了。这些盟友让美国的儿女——我们的儿女——置身于危险之中。没有任何借口能够为此开脱。”

    尽管措辞严厉,赫格塞斯还是承认,许多北约成员国在加强防务方面取得长足进步,并称工作正在取得进展。

    “一些盟友已经领会我们的意思并采取行动。你们自己心里清楚,我们对此深表感谢。”

  • 分析:特朗普虽不惜大让步 美伊协议恐难达成


    2026年6月18日 18:36 / 联合早报

    美伊宣布签署谅解备忘录,初步达成停战协议后,德黑兰在星期三(6月17日)晚间举行聚会,支持伊朗政府的群众高举手机亮起灯光并挥舞国旗。 (路透社)

    (华盛顿综合电)美国政府借伊朗绝不能发展核武和导弹等红线,作为对德黑兰采取军事行动的理由,不过特朗普总统的最新表态凸显他为求与伊朗达成停战,几乎完全摒弃了这些红线。分析指美伊签署的谅解备忘录文本显示美国做出巨大让步,却仅仅换来伊朗放松对霍尔木兹海峡的钳制,最后仍可能无法达成终极协议。

    特朗普星期三(6月17日)在法国出席七国集团(G7)峰会后,召开记者会说明美伊签署的初步停战协议,他虽然重申伊朗永不会拥有核武器,但随后却暗示伊朗应当有权拥有浓缩铀、获准研发弹道导弹,以及动用被美国冻结的巨额美元资产。

    对于浓缩铀,特朗普说:“一些周边邻国有,你却不让他们以发电和其他目的持有,这有点说不过去……你得有点常识。”

    说到弹道导弹,特朗普同样称周边邻国也有,“导弹不是问题,它们可以破坏一些地区,但不会将地球炸毁。”

    至于伊朗被冻结的庞大美元资产,特朗普说:“这不是我们的钱,是他们的。我们在某个时刻冻结,终究还是得归还。如果不还,以后就没人投资美元了。”

    对此,彭博社发表分析文章点出,自前总统奥巴马2015年与伊朗签署“联合全面行动计划”(JCPOA,简称伊朗核协议)后,这三大课题就一直是美国处理伊朗问题的核心争议所在,特朗普本身更多次以此抨击奥巴马在遏止伊朗的威胁方面遭遇重大挫败。

    曾在小布什和特朗普首个任内担任国务院幕僚的惠顿(Christian Whiton)向彭博社说:“特朗普做了很多他之前一直批评奥巴马的事。不论他的本意是什么,他要表明的是美国不会恢复军事行动,因为这么做会造成大萧条时代以来最严重的经济衰退。”

    CNN评论指特朗普满足了伊朗过往要不到的好处

    美国有线电视新闻网(CNN) 全球事务分析员麦格克(Brett McGurk)则发表分析文章指出,以美伊公布的14点谅解备忘录文本来看,特朗普似乎认定能达成任何协议,都比胶着于现状好,伊朗以霍尔木兹海峡要挟美国的策略看来已成功。

    麦格克曾在小布什、奥巴马、特朗普首任和拜登政府的国家安全委员会任职,以往也曾参与跟伊朗的艰难谈判,他指出,这份14点备忘录“给了许多伊朗以往要求过却极少得到”的好处。

    根据备忘录,美国将撤除美军在霍尔木兹海峡的封堵,伊朗将清除水雷等障碍,确保海峡航运恢复至战前水平。然而,伊朗除此就没有其他义务,美国却须在协议签署后豁免伊朗原油和其他石化产品的制裁,等同于恢复在伊朗核协议下,伊朗可享有的条件,每年可从中赚取600亿至700亿美元的石油收入。

    麦格克分析,备忘录关于伊朗资产解冻的条款相当棘手,美国甚至可能须在伊朗履行开放海峡的承诺前就处理这个事项,而且伊朗央行有权指定解冻资金的受益人,除了伊朗核协议,以往其他协议都不曾这么设定。

    麦格克进一步点出,伊朗并未针对核武器做出任何新承诺,特朗普签署备忘录付出极大代价,却仅换来伊朗重申了与伊朗核协议类似的承诺。

    至于外界广为关注的3000亿美元重建基金,备忘录虽没有直接设立这个基金,却要求美国和区域伙伴在未来60天内制定全套计划,且须作为终极协议的一部分。这意味着,没有这笔资金,就没有终极协议。

    麦格克根据备忘录文本和伊朗过去47年来的谈判套路预测,美国政府很难将这份一面倒的备忘录转化成完整的协议,“备忘录标榜要达成的和平,恐怕难以持久”。

    分析:特朗普虽不惜大让步 美伊协议恐难达成

    2026年6月18日 18:36 / 联合早报

    美伊宣布签署谅解备忘录,初步达成停战协议后,德黑兰在星期三(6月17日)晚间举行聚会,支持伊朗政府的群众高举手机亮起灯光并挥舞国旗。 (路透社)

    (华盛顿综合电)美国政府借伊朗绝不能发展核武和导弹等红线,作为对德黑兰采取军事行动的理由,不过特朗普总统的最新表态凸显他为求与伊朗达成停战,几乎完全摒弃了这些红线。分析指美伊签署的谅解备忘录文本显示美国做出巨大让步,却仅仅换来伊朗放松对霍尔木兹海峡的钳制,最后仍可能无法达成终极协议。

    特朗普星期三(6月17日)在法国出席七国集团(G7)峰会后,召开记者会说明美伊签署的初步停战协议,他虽然重申伊朗永不会拥有核武器,但随后却暗示伊朗应当有权拥有浓缩铀、获准研发弹道导弹,以及动用被美国冻结的巨额美元资产。

    对于浓缩铀,特朗普说:“一些周边邻国有,你却不让他们以发电和其他目的持有,这有点说不过去……你得有点常识。”

    说到弹道导弹,特朗普同样称周边邻国也有,“导弹不是问题,它们可以破坏一些地区,但不会将地球炸毁。”

    至于伊朗被冻结的庞大美元资产,特朗普说:“这不是我们的钱,是他们的。我们在某个时刻冻结,终究还是得归还。如果不还,以后就没人投资美元了。”

    对此,彭博社发表分析文章点出,自前总统奥巴马2015年与伊朗签署“联合全面行动计划”(JCPOA,简称伊朗核协议)后,这三大课题就一直是美国处理伊朗问题的核心争议所在,特朗普本身更多次以此抨击奥巴马在遏止伊朗的威胁方面遭遇重大挫败。

    曾在小布什和特朗普首个任内担任国务院幕僚的惠顿(Christian Whiton)向彭博社说:“特朗普做了很多他之前一直批评奥巴马的事。不论他的本意是什么,他要表明的是美国不会恢复军事行动,因为这么做会造成大萧条时代以来最严重的经济衰退。”

    CNN评论指特朗普满足了伊朗过往要不到的好处

    美国有线电视新闻网(CNN) 全球事务分析员麦格克(Brett McGurk)则发表分析文章指出,以美伊公布的14点谅解备忘录文本来看,特朗普似乎认定能达成任何协议,都比胶着于现状好,伊朗以霍尔木兹海峡要挟美国的策略看来已成功。

    麦格克曾在小布什、奥巴马、特朗普首任和拜登政府的国家安全委员会任职,以往也曾参与跟伊朗的艰难谈判,他指出,这份14点备忘录“给了许多伊朗以往要求过却极少得到”的好处。

    根据备忘录,美国将撤除美军在霍尔木兹海峡的封堵,伊朗将清除水雷等障碍,确保海峡航运恢复至战前水平。然而,伊朗除此就没有其他义务,美国却须在协议签署后豁免伊朗原油和其他石化产品的制裁,等同于恢复在伊朗核协议下,伊朗可享有的条件,每年可从中赚取600亿至700亿美元的石油收入。

    麦格克分析,备忘录关于伊朗资产解冻的条款相当棘手,美国甚至可能须在伊朗履行开放海峡的承诺前就处理这个事项,而且伊朗央行有权指定解冻资金的受益人,除了伊朗核协议,以往其他协议都不曾这么设定。

    麦格克进一步点出,伊朗并未针对核武器做出任何新承诺,特朗普签署备忘录付出极大代价,却仅换来伊朗重申了与伊朗核协议类似的承诺。

    至于外界广为关注的3000亿美元重建基金,备忘录虽没有直接设立这个基金,却要求美国和区域伙伴在未来60天内制定全套计划,且须作为终极协议的一部分。这意味着,没有这笔资金,就没有终极协议。

    麦格克根据备忘录文本和伊朗过去47年来的谈判套路预测,美国政府很难将这份一面倒的备忘录转化成完整的协议,“备忘录标榜要达成的和平,恐怕难以持久”。

  • 英媒:摩根大通禁止香港员工使用Anthropic模型


    2026年6月18日 16:03 / 联合早报

    美国投行摩根大通已禁止香港员工访问Anthropic的人工智能(AI)模型。 (路透社档案照片)

    英国媒体报道,美国投行摩根大通已禁止香港员工访问Anthropic的人工智能(AI)模型,显示这一技术在美国境外的应用正面临极其严格的审查。

    据路透社引述《金融时报》报道,三名知情人士透露,由于Anthropic与摩根大通的许可协议中有关“使用条款”的特定措辞,摩根大通已将Claude模型从其驻港员工获批使用的大型语言模型(LLM)内部名单中移除。

    在此之前,高盛也做出了类似决定,于今年4月将Claude从其香港员工的获准使用工具名单中剔除。

    今年4月,Anthropic首次向少数企业和机构开放Mythos模型测试,并警告该模型具备发现网络安全漏洞的能力,不宜广泛推广。今年6月初,Anthropic发布了Mythos级模型的首个公开版本Fable 5,但为管控其突破网络漏洞的能力,同步设置了许多限制措施。

    然而,华盛顿仍以国家安全为由下达紧急出口管制令,迫使Anthropic在全球范围内关停Mythos 5和Fable 5模型。

    延伸阅读

    美国担忧Anthropic模型被中俄等军情机构利用

    随着中美两国在AI技术、数据安全以及先进计算工具获取方面的紧张关系不断升温,西方科技公司开发的AI技术在海外市场的应用正面临愈发严苛的限制。

    多年来,华盛顿一直对用于训练AI的晶片实施严密管控,而此次则直接将审查触角伸向了模型本身。

    尽管美国企业开发的AI模型并未向中国大陆开放,但只要遵守美企设定的使用限制,香港在很大程度上仍是这些模型获准运营的市场。

    英媒:摩根大通禁止香港员工使用Anthropic模型

    2026年6月18日 16:03 / 联合早报

    美国投行摩根大通已禁止香港员工访问Anthropic的人工智能(AI)模型。 (路透社档案照片)

    英国媒体报道,美国投行摩根大通已禁止香港员工访问Anthropic的人工智能(AI)模型,显示这一技术在美国境外的应用正面临极其严格的审查。

    据路透社引述《金融时报》报道,三名知情人士透露,由于Anthropic与摩根大通的许可协议中有关“使用条款”的特定措辞,摩根大通已将Claude模型从其驻港员工获批使用的大型语言模型(LLM)内部名单中移除。

    在此之前,高盛也做出了类似决定,于今年4月将Claude从其香港员工的获准使用工具名单中剔除。

    今年4月,Anthropic首次向少数企业和机构开放Mythos模型测试,并警告该模型具备发现网络安全漏洞的能力,不宜广泛推广。今年6月初,Anthropic发布了Mythos级模型的首个公开版本Fable 5,但为管控其突破网络漏洞的能力,同步设置了许多限制措施。

    然而,华盛顿仍以国家安全为由下达紧急出口管制令,迫使Anthropic在全球范围内关停Mythos 5和Fable 5模型。

    延伸阅读
    美国担忧Anthropic模型被中俄等军情机构利用

    随着中美两国在AI技术、数据安全以及先进计算工具获取方面的紧张关系不断升温,西方科技公司开发的AI技术在海外市场的应用正面临愈发严苛的限制。

    多年来,华盛顿一直对用于训练AI的晶片实施严密管控,而此次则直接将审查触角伸向了模型本身。

    尽管美国企业开发的AI模型并未向中国大陆开放,但只要遵守美企设定的使用限制,香港在很大程度上仍是这些模型获准运营的市场。

  • 巴拉克·奥巴马直面民主党仍需完成的工作——以及他自身仍需面对的课题


    2026-06-18T09:00:26.485Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    • 随着巴拉克·奥巴马耗资8.5亿美元的总统图书馆在芝加哥揭幕,尽管有部分人士批评他的执政时期,他仍是民主党内部最主要的团结性人物。
    • 奥巴马仍在为11月的中期选举为候选人提供建议、谋划战略。
    • 批评者认为奥巴马政府时期不够大胆激进,其执政遗产正引发争议。

    本文由AI生成摘要,并经CNN编辑审核。

    芝加哥——

    当地时间周四,美国前总统巴拉克·奥巴马终于得偿所愿:他的文字被镌刻在石碑上,一座纪念其总统任期的纪念碑将融入芝加哥天际线。

    过去几个月里,奥巴马在这座耗资8.5亿美元的多功能总统中心里四处察看,他在游乐场的滑梯上滑行,试坐各处座椅,并提醒工作人员给部分椅子加装防滑垫,以免刮花地板。他还要求重新制作一段关于体育主题展览的全部文案,因为原版文案读起来不像是真正的体育爱好者所写,这让他感到不满。

    但在图书馆揭幕前夜,他对一场由其竞选团队和政府团队前成员参加的聚会表示,他并不沉迷于怀旧,也不打算沉溺其中。

    “我认为怀旧意味着一种情绪,即过去的某段时光在某种程度上是黄金时代、更加美好,但如今已遥不可及,”他在周三说道,“这会让我们推卸责任,因为它会让我们产生‘好吧,那时候很棒,但现在是现实,我们对此无能为力’的想法。”

    这位美国第44任总统还未准备好淡出历史。而许多民主党高层也不希望他如此。

    “相较于如今美国共和党所代表的理念,‘希望与变革’仍是极具说服力的对立叙事,”众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯对CNN表示。

    在卸任 Oval Office 十年后,奥巴马仍是美国民众认可度最高的在世总统,也是在因领导层争端和关键议题路线分歧而陷入分裂的民主党内部最主要的团结性人物。但在周四揭幕仪式VIP观礼区之外,人们对他的遗产评价则更为复杂。

    在部分人看来,在唐纳德·特朗普成功赢得两次大选之后,谈论“希望与变革”听起来显得天真幼稚,或是与现实脱节的陈词滥调。尤其是在左翼崛起阵营的批评者看来,奥巴马在总统任内被认为不够大胆激进,尤其是在外交政策和经济议题上,这正是导致民主党乃至整个国家当前处境的根源。

    伊利诺伊州州长JB·普利茨克是奥巴马的旧友,他将这座总统中心描述为一项“积极投入的事业,旨在为未来培养和推举领导人”。

    “我非常反对‘巴拉克·奥巴马应为后续发生的一切负责’这种说法,”他补充道,“我想我们所有人都在很多方面对当下的处境负有责任。我的意思是,我没有投票支持那些事,但我们都对如今国家的现状负有一份责任。”

    整座总统中心里,处处可见奥巴马要求增设的标识,主题均为“未竟之业”——这个短语曾在他的第二任期演讲中出现,也贯穿了他卸任后的公开活动。

    博物馆的多个展区都收录了不同声音,有人认为奥巴马执政期间走得太远,也有人认为他做得不够,涉及移民、气候变化、医疗保健和枪支暴力等议题——后者常被奥巴马称为其总统任期最大的败笔。

    每座总统图书馆都带有圣徒传记式的叙事色彩。例如“经济危机与复苏”展区介绍了奥巴马接手的银行业崩盘状况,并解释了他如何“大胆采取行动拯救经济,并在新的增长与繁荣基础上进行重建”。根据CNN提前获取的预览照片,“未竟之业”牌匾将国会归咎为未能解决奥巴马认为存在的经济深层问题的原因,包括“让员工更易组建工会、保障带薪病假和家庭休假,以及提高最低工资标准”。

    “他接过了民权运动的遗产,却将其拱手让给了华尔街,”经济领域作家马特·斯特勒尔说道,他领导着自由主义智库美国经济自由项目。斯特勒尔补充道:“他为唐纳德·特朗普的威权主义埋下了导火索。他创造了唐纳德·特朗普得以上台的环境。”

    但民主党高层仍迫不及待地随时与奥巴马站在一起。

    “时隔10年、20年再去评判是很难的。我年轻时是一名出色的运动员,但我能想到每一场比赛,如果能重来一次,我本可以做得更好,”新泽西州参议员科里·布克说道,他曾在斯坦福大学打过橄榄球,“但在当时那个时代,巴拉克·奥巴马是英雄,他拯救了我们的经济,并在一些具体指标上推动了国家进步,这些影响持久且仍在发挥作用。”

    杰弗里斯经常与奥巴马通电话或当面交流。他们的谈话内容从私人话题到战略评估,再到政治建议,比如支持去年的政府停摆事件相关举措。

    杰弗里斯有望在11月民主党夺回众议院多数席位后出任议长,他用芝加哥体育界的比喻来形容奥巴马在民主党中持续发挥的核心作用。

    “奥巴马总统在任时就像迈克尔·乔丹,”杰弗里斯说,“卸任后他就像菲尔·杰克逊。”

    64岁的奥巴马曾在公开和私下场合对自己在政坛的参与度感到不快,部分原因是特朗普的持久影响力,以及前总统乔·拜登执政期间的表现。

    但尽管奥巴马每年都不愿在每个选举周期中奔波超过数日竞选,他仍享受着自己在民主党政坛的主导地位——即便他的多位密友顾问(其中几位接受了CNN的本次采访)认为,他的参与不仅仅是出于虚荣心。

    “这当然令人受用,但背后指向了更重要的事实:美国民众大体上仍认同他的愿景和主张,”埃里克·舒尔茨说道,他曾在奥巴马白宫团队任职,之后一直协助奥巴马规划卸任后的活动,“如今是黑暗时期,但如果全国各地的民选官员都在寻求他的发声,这就很好地证明,他的整套理论仍能引起广泛共鸣。”

    衡量民主党候选人对奥巴马态度的一个简单标尺,是向其办公室提出的背书请求数量——据知情人士透露,这一数字始终居高不下。另一个标尺是去年加州的焦点小组调查,结果显示他是民主党推动该州新选区划分提案的最佳代言人。还有各种场合的引用:从洛杉矶共和党市长候选人斯宾塞·普拉特声称“我觉得我和他有着相同的经历”,到佛罗里达州众议员黛比·沃瑟曼·舒尔茨在一段视频中宣布将参选一个非裔人口占多数的选区,背景墙上就挂着一张复古的“HOPE(希望)”竞选海报。

    当奥巴马参与今年春季弗吉尼亚州民主党成功推动但随后被推翻的选区划分公投活动时,杰弗里斯指出,该议题双方的广告都引用了这位前总统的言论。

    2025年6月,佐赫兰·曼达尼在纽约市市长初选中获胜后不久,奥巴马就打来电话,就如何开展治理工作提供建议,并提出愿意充当他的倾听者。这一举动让双方都提升了公信力:曼达尼赢得了当时33岁的民主社会主义者怀疑论者的认可,奥巴马则赢得了他一直希望与之并肩的年轻变革者的支持。

    据知情人士透露,在今年早些时候的一次会议接近尾声时,奥巴马照例提出,如果需要更多帮助可以随时告知。曼达尼起初提出的一个想法并不契合,之后又回来请求协助推广他推动的全民育儿计划。

    奥巴马随后与曼达尼一同在布朗克斯的一家托儿中心为学龄前儿童读书、合唱《公共汽车轮子》,这场活动安排在奥巴马夫妇前往纽约观看他们联合制作的百老汇戏剧期间。这与曼达尼2013年的推文形成了鲜明对比:当时这位21岁的鲍登学院学生还在网上写道,“奥巴马不是已经证明了, lesser evil(较小的恶)其实也坏得要命吗?”这条推文至今仍在。

    尽管奥巴马并未像2020年大选前那样正式接待潜在的2028年总统候选人,但他已经在华盛顿办公室接待了马里兰州州长韦斯·摩尔和宾夕法尼亚州州长乔希·夏皮罗,进行了长时间的会谈。

    “我理解人们当下对事态发展的不满,”摩尔说道,“我也有同感。我认为有人对政府的防御姿态感到不满,有人对国家当前的发展方向感到不满。奥巴马总统不是问题的根源。正是像他这样的领导,才是我们此前见过的这类问题的解药。”

    不仅仅是在博物馆里,人们正在辩论奥巴马的个人遗产。

    “当然,我本希望能有更好的结果,比如单一支付者医保体系之类的,”亚利桑那州众议员亚萨明·安萨里说道,她去年在众议院民主党新人会议上介绍了奥巴马,并描述了奥巴马生动讲解2010年通过《平价医疗法案》时的政治博弈过程,“但那是2000年代,那时候不可能实现。”

    安萨里高中时期就曾为奥巴马的竞选活动挨家挨户拉票。她说,20年后在会议室里见到他,而她自己也刚拿到国会徽章几个月,这种感觉 surreal(超现实)。

    “我们这一代新领导人正在崛起,现任议员、全国各地各级参选的候选人,他们代表着当下新一代高中生的希望与变革,”安萨里说道,“这就是奥巴马的全部遗产。”

    希望与特朗普

    据了解奥巴马想法的人士透露,奥巴马目前将自己的角色定位为:通过精心选择的发声时刻,确保另一种世界观取得胜利。他正在推进“奥巴马学者”公民参与项目。他希望继续践行小马丁·路德·金所说的“道德宇宙的弧线终将弯曲”(他经常引用这句话),同时也试图为民主党掌舵,避免其走向他认为会适得其反的方向。

    奥巴马和特朗普都不愿放过对方,医疗保健和中东等议题贯穿了两人的总统任期。特朗普经常在社交媒体上提及奥巴马的中间名侯赛因。而就在周三,特朗普在对比两人与伊朗的谈判时说道:“他们都嘲笑奥巴马,说他是个愚蠢的狗娘养的。”

    当然,在此之前,奥巴马在图书馆揭幕前夕接受《早安美国》采访时批评了特朗普对伊朗的战争政策,并表示:“毋庸置疑,未来达成的任何协议,都不太可能比我们最初达成的协议有显著不同或显著改善。”

    奥巴马决定不邀请特朗普出席揭幕仪式,摒弃了总统图书馆揭幕的传统两党合作惯例,上一次此类惯例还是在2013年乔治·W·布什的图书馆揭幕仪式上。特朗普则在社交媒体上发布了一张AI生成的图片,显示一个垃圾袋堆在奥巴马的塔楼顶部,并配文称这里将成为“仇视美国者的‘麦加’!”

    奥巴马对特朗普连任的担忧依然强烈,尤其是在共和党人不愿加以抵制的情况下。但当他得知共和党参议员比尔·卡西迪两周前未经宣布前来参观中心时,感到十分欣慰。卡西迪因在弹劾特朗普的审判中投下定罪票,未能重新获得特朗普阵营的支持,上个月在路易斯安那州初选中落败。

    卡西迪当时正在该地区参加孙女在芝加哥大学的毕业典礼,距离中心仅几个街区,工作人员为他预留了预展门票。两人并无活跃的私人关系,事后也未交谈。据了解奥巴马反应的人士透露,奥巴马表示,这正是他希望这座中心所承载的精神。

    周三晚间,米歇尔·奥巴马与丈夫一同出席了前竞选团队和政府团队成员的活动,她提出了更为尖锐的目标。她表示,这座中心的意义在于“将这段遗产留存下来,让任何人——任何人——都无法装作这一切从未发生过”。

    Barack Obama confronts the work that remains for Democrats — and for him

    2026-06-18T09:00:26.485Z / CNN

    • As Barack Obama opens his $850 million presidential center in Chicago, he remains a primary unifying figure in the Democratic Party even as some criticize his time in office.
    • Obama continues advising candidates and shaping strategy ahead of November’s midterm elections.
    • His legacy faces debate from critics who see his presidency as insufficiently bold.

    AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.

    Chicago—

    Former President Barack Obama on Thursday is getting what he wanted for so long: his words carved into stone, a monument to his presidency entering the Chicago skyline.

    Walking through his $850 million, multiuse presidential center the past few months, Obama went down the slide in the playground and tried out the chairs, noting which ones needed stoppers to keep from scuffing the floors. He asked for the whole text of an exhibit on sports to be redone, frustrated that the original text didn’t seem written by a true fan.

    But he also told a gathering of his campaign and administration alumni, the night before the center’s opening, that he didn’t believe in nostalgia and didn’t intend to wallow in it.

    “I think nostalgia implies this sentiment that there’s this thing in the past that was somehow golden and better, but is unattainable now,” he said Wednesday. “And it lets us off the hook, because it makes us feel like, ‘Well, you know, that was wonderful, but now, this is the reality, and there’s not much we can do about it.’”

    The 44th president isn’t ready to fade into history. And many top Democrats don’t want him to.

    “Hope and change still remain incredibly powerful as a counter-narrative to what the Republican Party at this moment stands for in America,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told CNN.

    A decade after he walked out of the Oval Office, Obama is still the most popular living president and the primary unifying figure in a party racked by leadership disputes and fights over its direction on key issues. But his legacy beyond those elbowing for their spots in the VIP section of Thursday’s opening is more complicated.

    To some, talk of hope and change can come off as naïve or a disconnected relic after President Donald Trump’s two successful campaigns. Particularly to his critics on the rising left, Obama’s perceived lack of boldness while president, particularly on foreign policy and economic issues, is exactly what led their party and the country overall to now.

    Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, an old Obama friend, described the presidential center as an “active, engaged endeavor to lift up and train leaders for the future.”

    “I really reject the notion that somehow Barack Obama is responsible for what came after,” he added. “I guess we’re all responsible in many ways for where we are. I mean, I didn’t vote for it, but we all have a share of responsibility for where the country is today.”

    Throughout the presidential center, there are signs Obama asked to be added throughout, all on the same theme: “The Work That Remained,” a phrase that popped up in his second-term speeches and throughout his post-presidency.

    Voices are featured in several spots through the museum arguing that Obama went too far or didn’t go far enough, including on topics such as immigration, climate change, healthcare and gun violence — the last of which he has often cited as a great failure of his presidency.

    Hagiography comes with every presidential library. The “Economic Crisis and Recovery” exhibit, for example, notes the banking collapse Obama inherited and explains how he “responded boldly to rescue and rebuild it on a new foundation for growth and prosperity.” The “Work That Remained” plaque blames Congress for not addressing what Obama believed were the underlying problems of the economy, including “to make it easier for employees to form unions, for guaranteed paid sick and family leave, and for a higher minimum wage,” according to a preview photograph shared with CNN.

    “He took the legacy of the Civil Rights Movement and traded it to Wall Street,” said Matt Stoller, a writer on economics who leads the liberal American Economic Liberties Project. Added Stoller: “He lit the fuse for authoritarianism under Donald Trump. He created the world for Donald Trump to come into.”

    But top Democrats are eager to stand with Obama whenever they can.

    “It’s very hard to sit 10, 20 years later and cast judgment. I was a beast of an athlete back in my day, but there’s not a game that I played that I can’t think of things I could have done better if I could go back and relive them,” said New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, who played football at Stanford. “But in the time, Barack Obama was a hero and saved our economy and advanced our nation along really specific indices that are lasting and still are making a difference.”

    Jeffries is frequently on the phone or in rooms with Obama. Their conversations range from the personal to gut checks on strategy to political advice like supporting what became last year’s government shutdown.

    Jeffries, who is on track to be House speaker if Democrats take the majority in November, offered a Chicago sports reference to describe how central he sees Obama’s ongoing role for the party.

    “President Obama was Michael Jordan while he was in office,” Jeffries said, “and he’s Phil Jackson out of it.”

    Obama, 64, has bristled publicly and privately about how involved he’s been in politics, in part due to Trump’s enduring influence and the way that former President Joe Biden’s time in office turned out.

    But despite his annual reluctance to campaign more than a few days in each election cycle, Obama still loves the dominance he has in Democratic politics – even as his closest advisers, several of whom spoke to CNN for this story, argue his engagement is about more than ego.

    “It’s certainly flattering, but points to something more important: the country is still largely aligned with his vision and his story,” said Eric Schultz, an adviser who’s been helping Obama craft his post-presidency since working for him in the White House. “It’s a dark time, but if elected officials from across the country are seeking his voice, that’s a pretty good sign that his theory of the case still very much resonates.”

    An easy measure of how Democratic candidates feel about Obama is the rate of endorsement requests coming into his office that, according to people familiar with the matter, has remained as high as ever. Another is the focus groups in California last year that showed him the best messenger for Democrats’ ballot proposition to newly gerrymander the state. Or all the ways he’s invoked, from Republican Los Angeles mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt arguing, “I feel like him and I have the same experience,” to Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz announcing she would run in a majority-Black district in a video with a vintage “HOPE” poster displayed over her shoulder.

    When Obama got involved with the spring campaign for Virginia Democrats’ successful but since-overturned gerrymandering referendum, Jeffries noted that ads on both sides of the issue featured comments from the former president.

    Not long after Zohran Mamdani won his primary for New York City mayor in June 2025, Obama was on the phone, giving advice on getting governing right, offering to be a sounding board. Both got a credibility bump: Mamdani with skeptics of a then-33-year-old democratic socialist, Obama with the young change-makers he always wants to be counted with.

    According to people familiar with the matter, toward the end of a meeting earlier in the year, Obama made his standard offer to let him know if there was more he could do to help. Mamdani pitched one idea that didn’t gel, then came back asking for help promoting his push for universal childcare.

    Obama joined Mamdani to read to preschoolers and sing “Wheels on the Bus” at a childcare center in the Bronx, arranged around a trip to New York the Obamas were making to see a performance of the play they are co-producing on Broadway. It felt an especially long way from Mamdani’s 2013 tweets, like the one still up from the then-21-year-old Bowdoin student, “Hasnt Obama shown that the lesser evil is still pretty damn evil?”

    Though he has not been officially bringing in prospective 2028 presidential candidates as he was already doing at this point ahead of the 2020 election, Obama has hosted both Maryland Gov. Wes Moore and Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro at his Washington office for longer meetings.

    “I understand the frustrations that people have right now with the way things are going,” Moore said. “I share them. I think there are people frustrated with the level of defensiveness, I think the people frustrated with the direction the country’s going right now. President Obama is not the reason for it. It was leadership like his that was the antidote when we saw this before.”

    It’s not just in the museum where Obama is debating his own legacy.

    “Of course I would have wanted something better and single-payer and the rest,” Arizona Rep. Yassamin Ansari, who introduced him last year at a meeting with other freshman House Democrats and described his eye-opening rundown of dealing with the politics of passing the Affordable Care Act, which passed in 2010. “But this was the 2000s and that wasn’t going to happen.”

    As a junior in high school, Ansari was knocking on doors for Obama’s campaign. She said seeing him 20 years later in the room with her, just a few months after she got her own congressional pin, was surreal.

    “We have a new generation of leaders coming up right now, current members, people running for office at different levels across the country who represent hope and change for the new group of high schoolers that are out there right now,” Ansari said. “That’s Obama’s entire legacy.”

    Hope and Trump

    Obama sees his role at this point more as ensuring a different worldview will win out through carefully chosen moments of speaking out, according to people familiar with his thinking. He is building his Obama Fellows civic engagement programs. He wants to keep doing more of the bending of “the arc of the moral universe,” as Martin Luther King Jr. said in a quote he often cites, while also trying to provide a rudder to keep his party from moving in directions he fears will be self-defeating.

    Neither Obama nor Trump is letting the other go, given the issues like healthcare and the Middle East that shaped both their presidencies. Trump often posts about Obama using his middle name, Hussein. And just on Wednesday, Trump said in comparing their respective negotiations with Iran, “They laughed at Obama and they said, ‘He’s a stupid son of a bitch.’”

    That was, of course, after Obama in an interview with “Good Morning America” leading up to the library opening criticized Trump’s war in Iran and said, “It is doubtful that any agreement that arises is going to be significantly different or a significant improvement from the deal that we had in the first place.”

    Obama decided not to invite Trump to the opening, eschewing the traditional bipartisanship around presidential centers last seen at George W. Bush’s library in 2013. Trump posted an AI-generated image showing a garbage bag atop Obama’s tower and saying it will be “a ‘Mecca’ for those who hate America!”

    Obama’s despair about Trump’s second term remains high, particularly around Republicans not pushing back. But he was pleased when he heard GOP Sen. Bill Cassidy, who lost his Louisiana primary last month after failing to re-ingratiate himself with Trump for his vote in an impeachment trial to convict him over the January 6 riots, made an unannounced visit to the center two weeks ago.

    Cassidy was in the area for his granddaughter’s graduation from the University of Chicago a few blocks away, and staff reached out for advance tickets to the soft launch. The two don’t have an active relationship and didn’t talk after. According to a person familiar with his reaction, Obama said that’s part of the spirit he wants for the center.

    Appearing with her husband on Wednesday night at the campaign and administration alumni event, Michelle Obama offered a more pointed goal. She said the center was there “to lay this legacy so that nobody — nobody — can act like this didn’t happen.”

  • 分析:特朗普虽不惜大让步 美伊协议恐难达成


    2026年6月18日 / 联合早报

    美伊宣布签署谅解备忘录,初步达成停战协议后,德黑兰在星期三(6月17日)晚间举行聚会,支持伊朗政府的群众高举手机亮起灯光并挥舞国旗。 (路透社)

    (华盛顿综合电)美国政府借伊朗绝不能发展核武和导弹等红线,作为对德黑兰采取军事行动的理由,不过特朗普总统的最新表态凸显他为求与伊朗达成停战,几乎完全摒弃了这些红线。分析指美伊签署的谅解备忘录文本显示美国做出巨大让步,却仅仅换来伊朗放松对霍尔木兹海峡的钳制,最后仍可能无法达成终极协议。

    特朗普星期三(6月17日)在法国出席七国集团(G7)峰会后,召开记者会说明美伊签署的初步停战协议,他虽然重申伊朗永不会拥有核武器,但随后却暗示伊朗应当有权拥有浓缩铀、获准研发弹道导弹,以及动用被美国冻结的巨额美元资产。

    对于浓缩铀,特朗普说:“一些周边邻国有,你却不让他们以发电和其他目的持有,这有点说不过去……你得有点常识。”

    说到弹道导弹,特朗普同样称周边邻国也有,“导弹不是问题,它们可以破坏一些地区,但不会将地球炸毁。”

    至于伊朗被冻结的庞大美元资产,特朗普说:“这不是我们的钱,是他们的。我们在某个时刻冻结,终究还是得归还。如果不还,以后就没人投资美元了。”

    对此,彭博社发表分析文章点出,自前总统奥巴马2015年与伊朗签署“联合全面行动计划”(JCPOA,简称伊朗核协议)后,这三大课题就一直是美国处理伊朗问题的核心争议所在,特朗普本身更多次以此抨击奥巴马在遏止伊朗的威胁方面遭遇重大挫败。

    曾在小布什和特朗普首个任内担任国务院幕僚的惠顿(Christian Whiton)向彭博社说:“特朗普做了很多他之前一直批评奥巴马的事。不论他的本意是什么,他要表明的是美国不会恢复军事行动,因为这么做会造成大萧条时代以来最严重的经济衰退。”

    CNN评论指特朗普满足了伊朗过往要不到的好处

    美国有线电视新闻网(CNN) 全球事务分析员麦格克(Brett McGurk)则发表分析文章指出,以美伊公布的14点谅解备忘录文本来看,特朗普似乎认定能达成任何协议,都比胶着于现状好,伊朗以霍尔木兹海峡要挟美国的策略看来已成功。

    麦格克曾在小布什、奥巴马、特朗普首任和拜登政府的国家安全委员会任职,以往也曾参与跟伊朗的艰难谈判,他指出,这份14点备忘录“给了许多伊朗以往要求过却极少得到”的好处。

    根据备忘录,美国将撤除美军在霍尔木兹海峡的封堵,伊朗将清除水雷等障碍,确保海峡航运恢复至战前水平。然而,伊朗除此就没有其他义务,美国却须在协议签署后豁免伊朗原油和其他石化产品的制裁,等同于恢复在伊朗核协议下,伊朗可享有的条件,每年可从中赚取600亿至700亿美元的石油收入。

    麦格克分析,备忘录关于伊朗资产解冻的条款相当棘手,美国甚至可能须在伊朗履行开放海峡的承诺前就处理这个事项,而且伊朗央行有权指定解冻资金的受益人,除了伊朗核协议,以往其他协议都不曾这么设定。

    麦格克进一步点出,伊朗并未针对核武器做出任何新承诺,特朗普签署备忘录付出极大代价,却仅换来伊朗重申了与伊朗核协议类似的承诺。

    至于外界广为关注的3000亿美元重建基金,备忘录虽没有直接设立这个基金,却要求美国和区域伙伴在未来60天内制定全套计划,且须作为终极协议的一部分。这意味着,没有这笔资金,就没有终极协议。

    麦格克根据备忘录文本和伊朗过去47年来的谈判套路预测,美国政府很难将这份一面倒的备忘录转化成完整的协议,“备忘录标榜要达成的和平,恐怕难以持久”。

    分析:特朗普虽不惜大让步 美伊协议恐难达成

    2026年6月18日 / 联合早报

    美伊宣布签署谅解备忘录,初步达成停战协议后,德黑兰在星期三(6月17日)晚间举行聚会,支持伊朗政府的群众高举手机亮起灯光并挥舞国旗。 (路透社)

    (华盛顿综合电)美国政府借伊朗绝不能发展核武和导弹等红线,作为对德黑兰采取军事行动的理由,不过特朗普总统的最新表态凸显他为求与伊朗达成停战,几乎完全摒弃了这些红线。分析指美伊签署的谅解备忘录文本显示美国做出巨大让步,却仅仅换来伊朗放松对霍尔木兹海峡的钳制,最后仍可能无法达成终极协议。

    特朗普星期三(6月17日)在法国出席七国集团(G7)峰会后,召开记者会说明美伊签署的初步停战协议,他虽然重申伊朗永不会拥有核武器,但随后却暗示伊朗应当有权拥有浓缩铀、获准研发弹道导弹,以及动用被美国冻结的巨额美元资产。

    对于浓缩铀,特朗普说:“一些周边邻国有,你却不让他们以发电和其他目的持有,这有点说不过去……你得有点常识。”

    说到弹道导弹,特朗普同样称周边邻国也有,“导弹不是问题,它们可以破坏一些地区,但不会将地球炸毁。”

    至于伊朗被冻结的庞大美元资产,特朗普说:“这不是我们的钱,是他们的。我们在某个时刻冻结,终究还是得归还。如果不还,以后就没人投资美元了。”

    对此,彭博社发表分析文章点出,自前总统奥巴马2015年与伊朗签署“联合全面行动计划”(JCPOA,简称伊朗核协议)后,这三大课题就一直是美国处理伊朗问题的核心争议所在,特朗普本身更多次以此抨击奥巴马在遏止伊朗的威胁方面遭遇重大挫败。

    曾在小布什和特朗普首个任内担任国务院幕僚的惠顿(Christian Whiton)向彭博社说:“特朗普做了很多他之前一直批评奥巴马的事。不论他的本意是什么,他要表明的是美国不会恢复军事行动,因为这么做会造成大萧条时代以来最严重的经济衰退。”

    CNN评论指特朗普满足了伊朗过往要不到的好处

    美国有线电视新闻网(CNN) 全球事务分析员麦格克(Brett McGurk)则发表分析文章指出,以美伊公布的14点谅解备忘录文本来看,特朗普似乎认定能达成任何协议,都比胶着于现状好,伊朗以霍尔木兹海峡要挟美国的策略看来已成功。

    麦格克曾在小布什、奥巴马、特朗普首任和拜登政府的国家安全委员会任职,以往也曾参与跟伊朗的艰难谈判,他指出,这份14点备忘录“给了许多伊朗以往要求过却极少得到”的好处。

    根据备忘录,美国将撤除美军在霍尔木兹海峡的封堵,伊朗将清除水雷等障碍,确保海峡航运恢复至战前水平。然而,伊朗除此就没有其他义务,美国却须在协议签署后豁免伊朗原油和其他石化产品的制裁,等同于恢复在伊朗核协议下,伊朗可享有的条件,每年可从中赚取600亿至700亿美元的石油收入。

    麦格克分析,备忘录关于伊朗资产解冻的条款相当棘手,美国甚至可能须在伊朗履行开放海峡的承诺前就处理这个事项,而且伊朗央行有权指定解冻资金的受益人,除了伊朗核协议,以往其他协议都不曾这么设定。

    麦格克进一步点出,伊朗并未针对核武器做出任何新承诺,特朗普签署备忘录付出极大代价,却仅换来伊朗重申了与伊朗核协议类似的承诺。

    至于外界广为关注的3000亿美元重建基金,备忘录虽没有直接设立这个基金,却要求美国和区域伙伴在未来60天内制定全套计划,且须作为终极协议的一部分。这意味着,没有这笔资金,就没有终极协议。

    麦格克根据备忘录文本和伊朗过去47年来的谈判套路预测,美国政府很难将这份一面倒的备忘录转化成完整的协议,“备忘录标榜要达成的和平,恐怕难以持久”。

  • 移民父母被捕引发儿童心理健康危机


    2026年6月18日 美国东部时间5:00 AM / KFF健康新闻

    洛杉矶讯——15岁的达米安·泽梅尼奥从学校回家的那一刻就察觉到不对劲。

    他的姨妈坐在餐桌旁啜泣。而他父亲——那天早上还步行送他去公交站,承诺放学后带他去吃晚餐的人——却不在家。

    45岁的单身父亲索尔·泽梅尼奥当天前往移民海关执法局办公室进行例行报到,这是他多年来一直遵守的要求。据他的律师透露,这位父亲曾获得暂缓遣返许可,得以留在美国并工作。但在10月3日那天,执法人员将他驱逐回墨西哥,而他自9岁起就未曾在那里生活过。泽梅尼奥一家表示,达米安的母亲从未参与过儿子的生活,因此自达米安幼年起,父亲便是他唯一的监护人。

    身为美国本土出生的达米安,突然发现自己与父亲相隔数千英里,还有一道戒备森严的边境将他们分开。这位原本开朗的十年级学生既没有驾照,也只会做几道简单的饭菜,从未独自生活过,如今却要独自度过青春期,父亲的身影只能定格在手机里的二维照片中。

    “我以为这不是真的,”达米安说,“我直接回了房间,不想出门,甚至不想吃饭。”

    image
    达米安·泽梅尼奥与父亲进行视频通话。单身家长索尔·泽梅尼奥在美国生活了36年后,于10月被驱逐回墨西哥。 卡拉·加切特 摄 KFF健康新闻

    像达米安这样的孩子估计有数十万,其中大多数是美国公民,他们因特朗普政府的驱逐政策而与父母分离。他们的父母要么被驱逐出境,要么被关押在距离家人居住地数英里之外的拘留中心数月之久。这些孩子与他们依赖的成年人被强行分开,有时甚至是通过暴力手段。父母曾在送孩子上学时、在家中以及与孩子一同参加移民报到时被捕。大多数被拘留者并无犯罪记录(未经授权留在美国通常属于民事违规行为)。父母离开后,孩子们的生活陷入恐惧与不确定之中。

    因此,一代移民家庭的儿童正出现可能影响其一生的心理健康问题。

    父母、治疗师以及其他与移民家庭打交道的人士表示,他们已经遇到过出现语言发育迟缓的学龄前儿童、谈及自杀的小学生,以及因焦虑而不敢出门的青少年。多项研究反复证实,将儿童与父母分开会损害他们的健康与发育。失去主要照顾者带来的压力会对儿童的大脑和身体造成严重破坏,增加他们患上精神和身体健康问题的风险,包括抑郁症、焦虑症、创伤后应激障碍、免疫系统减弱以及发育迟缓。

    “你能从他们的脸上看出来,他们的眼神里几乎没了光,”唐尼纪念基督教堂牧师坦尼娅·洛佩兹神父说道,她作为洛杉矶地区宗教领袖组成的支持组织的一员,定期拜访移民家庭。

    这种压力反应带来的健康风险是长期的。童年时期经历过父母分离和其他创伤事件的人,成年后更容易患上心脏病、糖尿病、癌症和其他慢性疾病。

    美国国土安全部在一份声明中表示,移民海关执法局并不会拆散家庭,父母会被问及是否希望与孩子一同被遣返,或指定一名可靠人士在美国照顾孩子。

    但妇女难民委员会和人权医师组织的一份报告发现,许多父母并没有选择权,移民海关执法局通常不会询问被拘留者是否有子女,也不会采取措施确保被留下的孩子的安全。索尔·泽梅尼奥表示,他被驱逐时,移民海关执法局的官员没有询问他儿子的情况,也没有核实达米安的福祉。

    在父亲被驱逐后的几天里,达米安不愿离开房间、不愿吃饭或上学。他不再和朋友说话,也不再玩他最喜欢的电子游戏《恐惧渐深》。一周后回到学校时,这位少年会在课堂上哭泣,或是因情绪崩溃而走出教室。就连他最喜欢的科目——英语,也失去了吸引力。

    达米安和父亲曾形影不离;家人们开玩笑说,他们从未见过两人分开的时候。泽梅尼奥会带着患有注意力缺陷多动障碍、自闭症和其他健康问题的达米安去看医生,为他做饭,帮他梳头。他喜欢带达米安去他们最喜欢的泰国餐厅,或是放学后去买珍珠奶茶。尽管他们经常开玩笑、互相捉弄,泽梅尼奥还是通过带达米安去建筑工地、去家得宝采购材料,让他明白了工作的重要性。

    达米安过去常常对父亲关于责任的励志谈话感到厌烦,而现在,这些谈话却是他最怀念的东西之一。

    “我每天都感谢父亲在离开前教我要坚强,”达米安说。

    在洛杉矶的另一个地方,9岁的雅各布性格腼腆,留着短短的卷发,身形瘦削,表情严肃,他非常想念妈妈。5月的一个周六,他紧紧攥着父亲的手,走在无家可归者、街头小贩和他们居住的狭窄公寓楼外弥漫的尿味之中。他希望妈妈能尽快从移民拘留所被释放,这样他就能再次拥抱她。

    “如果妈妈在这里,我会很开心,”他说,“但现在我不开心。”

    雅各布在某些方面是个典型的9岁孩子。他喜欢玩《罗布乐思》和《街头霸王》,梦想成为一名警察,拥有一只护卫犬,“因为你可以训练它们,它们会保护你”。

    但在与母亲在1月分离之前,他还经历了一段可怕的旅程。雅各布的父亲安德烈斯表示,2024年,他们全家因准军事组织成员威胁要杀害他们而逃离了哥伦比亚的家乡。在前往美国的途中,雅各布在穿越丛林时看到了尸体,与父母一起被持枪绑架并抢劫,目睹了一起强奸案,还不得不靠卖糖果和乞讨赚钱。KFF健康新闻未使用这对父子的真实姓名,因为该家庭担心这会危及他们的庇护申请。

    全家抵达洛杉矶后,雅各布开始做噩梦,极度害怕独处。他的父亲说,自从他开始上学并通过学区接受治疗后,情况有所好转。有那么一小段时间,全家都觉得找到了平静。

    随后,移民官员在一次报到会面中拘留了雅各布的母亲,当时他和安德烈斯正坐在等候室里。安德烈斯说,母亲的庇护申请尚未审结,也没有犯罪记录。父亲说,当官员告知他们妻子被拘留的消息,并递给他们一个装有她钱包和手机的袋子时,他和儿子崩溃了,两人空着手回了家,留下雅各布悲痛欲绝。

    “他吓坏了,”父亲强忍着泪水,声音越来越低地回忆那一刻,“他气得大哭。”

    从那以后,雅各布不愿吃饭或上学。在父亲的坚持下他去了学校,但老师打电话回家询问他为什么在课堂上哭泣。雅各布无法入睡,行为变得叛逆,还责怪父亲。

    “我妈妈什么时候回来?”他问父亲,“他们为什么抓我妈妈?我想妈妈。”

    与此同时,安德烈斯说,他自己也陷入了危机,一边徒劳地安慰儿子,一边为妻子的遭遇感到悲痛、焦虑和绝望。他停了两周的体力劳动工作来照顾雅各布,但这造成了经济压力,有时甚至没钱给妻子的 commissary 账户充值,让她能买到更好的食物并打电话。雅各巴靠那些电话通话度日。

    雅各布列出了所有他想念妈妈的事情,包括她做的饭(肉炒饭、鸡蛋玉米饼)、一起去公园、周末带他去剪头发、周末请他吃麦当劳,还有带他去教堂。最让他想念的是和妈妈的亲密时光。

    “我会躺在她身边,和她一起看视频,”他说,“我妈妈会抱我,我也会抱她。”

    有时他会喷妈妈的香水在自己身上,这样就能闻到她的味道。

    在阿德尔anto移民拘留中心待了近五个月后,雅各布的母亲于5月通过人身保护令申请获释。全家仍生活在被拘留或驱逐的恐惧之中。父亲担心自己也会被拘留,以及这对雅各布意味着什么。安德烈斯目前正在就两人的驱逐令提起上诉。

    布鲁金斯学会最近发表的一项分析估计,自特朗普再次就职以来,已有超过20万名儿童——其中包括14.5万名美国公民儿童——至少有一名父母被拘留。其中约三分之一的孩子年龄在6岁以下。随着联邦政府投入超过2000亿美元用于移民执法,包括从共和党《宏大美丽法案》获得的资金和特朗普本月签署的700亿美元拨款,父母被拘留的儿童数量预计还会增加。

    该报告显示,超过460万美国公民儿童与面临被驱逐风险的父母生活在一起。

    破碎的家庭

    诺埃米是危地马拉籍的母亲和庇护寻求者,她站在洛杉矶北部移民海关执法局办公室的停车场里,她的三个孩子哭嚎着紧紧抱住她,家庭汽车的玻璃碎片散落在他们脚边。

    此前不久,移民特工砸碎了车窗,在她和孩子们完成报到会面等待时,将她的伴侣从车里拖了出来。诺埃米说,他们在屋内时,官员试图将诺埃米与她9岁、7岁和1岁的孩子分开,但在孩子们开始尖叫后放弃了。与此同时,她的伴侣——一名在美国生活了近20年的墨西哥公民——被送往阿德尔anto移民拘留中心。

    “那天发生的事是一场悲剧,一件无法解释的事,”诺埃米说,她要求隐去全名,因为她担心分享自己的故事会遭到政府报复,“这件事会伴随你一生。我的家庭破碎了。”

    位于莫哈韦沙漠的私营阿德尔anto移民拘留中心是距离洛杉矶最近的移民拘留中心,也是美国最大的拘留中心之一。截至4月,该中心日均在押人数超过1700人,隔壁的沙漠景观附属中心另有426名在押人员。

    诺埃米说,自去年12月伴侣被拘留以来,她的孩子们变了一个人。

    她7岁的女儿此前一直快乐爱笑,后来变得抑郁,拒绝吃饭。她曾经优异的成绩一落千丈,还忘记了英语和西班牙语中的字母和数字名称。她和9岁的哥哥难以入睡,不停地问父亲去哪了,怀疑他们是不是做错了什么才导致父亲被带走。

    “为什么这种事会发生在我们身上?”他们问她,“我们很乖,我们在学习。”

    诺埃米最小的女儿本来已经学会走路,却又退回到爬行状态长达三个月。小女孩会在睡梦中哭喊:“爸爸!爸爸!”

    索菲亚·门多萨是洛杉矶县一家社区诊所的治疗师,专门为移民家庭提供服务。她说,与父母分离的儿童会经历一种形式的悲伤。他们很难接受父母不在身边的事实,因为父母还活着,却不在他们身边。这会破坏孩子与父母的依恋关系,以及他们未来建立信任关系的能力。

    许多孩子还会变得极度焦虑、愤怒和恐惧,门多萨说。年幼的孩子经常抱怨身体不适,比如胃痛,出现分离焦虑,还会退回到尿床等更早的行为模式。年龄较大的孩子可能会出现惊恐发作、噩梦和注意力不集中的问题。门多萨表示,失去照顾者还与儿童自杀和物质使用风险增加有关。

    诺曼·戈麦斯是奥克斯纳德的米斯特科原住民社区组织项目的项目经理。她说,去年夏天移民突袭行动震撼社区后,她9岁的女儿拒绝上学达一周之久,不敢离开父母,尽管他们都是合法美国居民。她在学校看到其他孩子因为家人被拘留而哭泣。戈麦斯给女儿看了他们的美国居留证件以安抚她。孩子还要求复印证件给同学们,希望能保护他们。

    “该长大了”

    回到东洛杉矶,达米安和姨妈住在一起,努力适应没有父亲在身边的生活。他说自己的成绩下滑了,因为在学校无法集中注意力。他不再想做以前和父亲一起喜欢做的事,比如外出就餐。

    “乐趣都结束了,”他说,“现在该长大了。”

    image
    达米安·泽梅尼奥在东洛杉矶的家中帮姨妈做午饭。自父亲被驱逐以来,达米安说他学会了更加独立,但他仍然想念父亲,经常感到悲伤、焦虑或愤怒。 卡拉·加切特 摄 KFF健康新闻

    失去父亲让达米安不得不变得更加独立,他和姨妈克劳迪娅·泽梅尼奥都这么说。以前,父亲几乎为他做了所有事。现在,达米安自己洗衣服、帮忙做家务,还自己梳头。他很保护姨妈们,她们都为兄弟的离开悲痛欲绝;他经常拥抱她们,讲笑话逗她们开心。他不想让她们因为自己的悲伤而更难过。

    达米安在校内和校外都接受了治疗。他说自己学会了呼吸练习,有所帮助,但很多时候他仍然感到悲伤和焦虑。有时他会感到愤怒。

    “我尽力去思考,保持专注,”他说,“但现在发生的这一切,当我内心悲痛欲绝时,我无法再伪装‘一切正常’了。”

    索尔·泽梅尼奥现在住在瓜达拉哈拉,他很担心儿子的健康。达米安患有1型神经纤维瘤病这种遗传病,会导致神经组织上长出肿瘤,包括头部的一颗肿瘤,如果不定期看医生并由家人监测,可能会影响他的大脑。他还患有癫痫,出生时只有一个肾脏,这意味着他容易疲劳,不能参加体育运动。索尔担心没有他在身边,儿子无法得到所需的治疗。作为达米安的法定监护人,克劳迪娅·泽梅尼奥正在尽她所能照顾他,但她自己也有两个孩子,还要照顾因中风导致神经系统问题的母亲。

    达米安尽可能多地和父亲通话。他希望能去墨西哥看望父亲,但他没有护照,作为16岁以下的未成年人,在没有父亲在场的情况下申请护照有更多要求。索尔正在与律师合作,争取合法返回美国的许可,但这个过程复杂且充满不确定性。

    所以,目前达米安只能抱着希望,期盼父亲能被允许回来,并努力成为他认为自己应该成为的人。他正计划在本月满16岁时考取驾照。他放弃了上大学的目标,反而想在高中毕业后立即找份工作,帮助姨妈们,并给父亲寄钱。

    他仍然会哭泣,但只会在房间里独自一人的时候。

    KFF健康新闻是一家全国性新闻编辑部,专注于报道健康议题的深度新闻,是KFF——独立的健康政策研究、民意调查和新闻资讯来源——的核心运营项目之一。

    Arrests of immigrant parents create mental health crisis for children

    June 18, 2026 5:00 AM EDT / KFF Health News

    Los Angeles— Damian Zermeño, 15, sensed something was wrong the moment he got home from school.

    His aunt sat at the dining table, sobbing. His father, who’d walked him to the bus stop that morning and promised to take him to dinner when he got back, wasn’t there.

    Saúl Zermeño, a 45-year-old single dad, had gone to a routine check-in appointment at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement office that morning, a requirement he’d complied with for years. The father had deferred action that allowed him to stay and work in the U.S., according to his attorney. But that day, Oct. 3, officers deported him to Mexico, where he hadn’t lived since he was 9 years old. Zermeño had been Damian’s sole caregiver since he was a baby because his mother chose not to be involved in the boy’s life, the family said.

    Suddenly, Damian, who was born in the U.S., found himself separated from his father by thousands of miles and a heavily guarded border. The previously cheerful 10th grader, who doesn’t have a driver’s license and can make a few basic dishes but isn’t used to cooking for himself, faced navigating his teenage years alone, his dad’s presence reduced to a two-dimensional image on his phone.

    “I thought it wasn’t true,” Damian said. “I just went to my room. I didn’t want to leave. I didn’t even want to eat.”

    Damian Zermeño talks to his father over video chat. Saúl Zermeño, a single parent, was deported to Mexico in October after living 36 years in the United States. Karla Gachet for KFF Health News

    Damian is among an estimated hundreds of thousands of children, most of them U.S. citizens, separated from a parent by the Trump administration’s deportation policies. Their mothers and fathers have been deported or locked for months inside detention centers, often miles away from where their families live. These children are separated, sometimes violently, from the adults they depend on. Parents have been arrested while dropping kids off at school, inside their homes, and at immigration check-ins with their children present. Most people detained have no criminal conviction. (Being in the U.S. without authorization is typically a civil offense). With their parents gone, kids’ lives are plunged into fear and uncertainty.

    As a result, a generation of children from immigrant families are exhibiting mental health problems that could affect them for years.

    Parents, therapists, and others who work with immigrant families said they’ve already encountered preschoolers with speech delays, elementary school children who talk of suicide, and teenagers too anxious to leave the house. Research has shown repeatedly that separating children from their parents harms their health and development. The stress of losing a primary caregiver creates havoc in a child’s brain and body, increasing their risk for mental and physical health problems, including depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, a weakened immune system, and developmental delays.

    “You can just see it in their faces; it’s almost like the light has been dimmed in their eyes,” said the Rev. Tanya Lopez, a pastor at Downey Memorial Christian Church who regularly visits immigrant families as part of a support organization made up of Los Angeles-area religious leaders.

    The health risks from this stress response are long-term. People who experience parental separation and other traumatic events as children are more likely to have heart disease, diabetes, cancer, and other chronic conditions as adults.

    In a statement, the Department of Homeland Security said ICE does not separate families, and that parents are asked if they want to be removed from the country with their children or to designate a safe person for them to stay with in the U.S.

    However, a report by the Women’s Refugee Commission and Physicians for Human Rights found that many parents aren’t given that choice, and that ICE often doesn’t ask detainees if they have children or take steps to ensure that children left behind are safe. Saúl Zermeño said ICE officers didn’t ask about his son or check on Damian’s well-being when he was deported.

    For days after his father’s deportation, Damian didn’t want to leave his room, eat, or go to school. He stopped talking to his friends. He stopped playing his favorite video game, Fears To Fathom. When he returned to school a week later, the teenager would cry in class or walk out overwhelmed with sadness. Even his favorite subject — English — lost its appeal.

    Damian and his father were inseparable; family members joked that they never saw one without the other. Zermeño took Damian, who has attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism, and other health conditions, to his medical appointments. He cooked for him and combed his hair. He loved to take Damian to his favorite Thai restaurant or to get boba drinks after school. As much as they joked around and played pranks on each other, Zermeño also taught Damian the importance of work by bringing him along to construction jobs and to find supplies at Home Depot.

    Damian used to get annoyed with his father’s motivational chats about responsibility. Now they’re one of the things he misses most.

    “I thank my dad every day for teaching me to be strong before he left,” Damian said.

    Elsewhere in Los Angeles, Jacob, a shy 9-year-old with cropped, curly hair, skinny limbs, and a serious expression, was missing his mom. On a Saturday in May, he clung tightly to his father’s hand as they walked among homeless people, street peddlers, and the stench of urine that hangs in the air outside the building where they live in a cramped apartment. He hoped his mom would soon be released from immigration detention so that he could hug her again.

    “If my mom was here, I’d be happy,” he said. “Right now, I’m not.”

    Jacob is in some ways a typical 9-year-old. He likes playing Roblox and Street Fighter. He dreams of becoming a police officer and of owning a guard dog, “because you can train them and they defend you.”

    But he also endured a harrowing journey, even before being separated from his mom in January. Jacob’s family fled their home country of Colombia in 2024 because members of a paramilitary group threatened to kill them, his father, Andreis, said. During their journey to the United States, Jacob saw dead bodies while trekking through the jungle, was kidnapped and robbed at gunpoint with his parents, witnessed a rape, and had to sell candy and beg for money, his dad said. KFF Health News is not using the father’s or son’s real name because the family fears it would jeopardize their asylum cases.

    After the family arrived in Los Angeles, Jacob suffered from nightmares and an intense fear of being alone. He started to recover once he began attending school and got connected to therapy through the school district, his dad said. For a short while, the family felt they had found peace.

    Then, immigration officers detained Jacob’s mother at a check-in appointment while he and Andreis sat in the waiting room. The mother has a pending asylum application and no criminal record, Andreis said. The father said he and his son broke down when officers informed them of his wife’s detention, handing them a bag with her wallet and cellphone. They returned home without her, leaving Jacob inconsolable.

    “He was terrified,” the father said, fighting back tears, his voice growing quiet as he recounted that moment. “He was crying with rage.”

    After that, Jacob didn’t want to eat or go to school. When he went to school at his dad’s insistence, his teacher called home to ask why he was crying in class. Jacob couldn’t sleep. He acted out. He blamed his dad.

    “When will my mom come back?” he asked his dad. “Why do they have my mom? I miss my mom.”

    At the same time, Andreis said, he was going through his own crisis, trying in vain to console his son while wrestling with grief, worry, and desperation over what happened to his wife. He stopped his work as a laborer for two weeks to take care of Jacob, but that created financial stress and meant he sometimes couldn’t afford to fund his wife’s commissary account so she could buy better food and make phone calls. Jacob lived for those phone calls.

    Jacob listed all the things he missed about his mom, including her cooking (rice with meat, corn cakes with egg), visiting the park together, and her taking him to get his hair cut, treating him to McDonald’s on the weekend, and bringing him to church. Most of all, he missed being close to her.

    “I would lie down with her, and I’d watch videos with her,” he said. “My mom would hug me and I’d hug her.”

    Sometimes he sprayed her perfume on himself so he could smell her.

    After almost five months at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center, Jacob’s mother was released based on a habeas corpus petition in May. The family is still living in fear of detention or deportation. The father worries he too could be detained, and what that would mean for Jacob. Andreis is currently appealing a removal order for the two of them.

    A recent analysis published by the Brookings Institution estimates that over 200,000 children — including 145,000 U.S. citizen children — have likely had at least one parent detained since President Trump returned to office. About a third of those children are under age 6. The number of children with detained parents is expected to grow as the federal government pours over $200 billion into immigration enforcement, including funding from the GOP’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act and a $70 billion appropriation Trump signed this month.

    More than 4.6 million U.S. citizen children live with a parent at risk of deportation, according to the report.

    Families broken

    Noemi, a Guatemalan mother and asylum seeker, stood in the parking lot at an ICE office north of Los Angeles, her three children wailing and clinging to her, glass from the family’s car scattered at their feet.

    Moments earlier, immigration agents had smashed a window and forced her partner out of the car while he waited for Noemi and the kids to finish a check-in appointment. While they were inside, officers tried to separate Noemi from the couple’s children, ages 9, 7, and 1, but gave up after the kids started screaming, Noemi said. Meanwhile, her partner, a Mexican national who’s lived in the U.S. for almost 20 years, was sent to the ICE detention center in Adelanto.

    “It was something tragic, something inexplicable that happened that day,” said Noemi, who asked to withhold her full name because she fears government retaliation for sharing her story. “It’s something that marks you for your whole life. My family was broken.”

    Located in the Mojave Desert, the privately run Adelanto ICE Processing Center is the immigration detention center closest to Los Angeles and one of the largest in the U.S. It held a daily average of over 1,700 people as of April, and a facility next door called the Desert View Annex held an additional 426.

    Since her partner’s detention in December, Noemi said, their children haven’t been the same.

    Her 7-year-old daughter, till then usually happy and smiling, became depressed and refused to eat. Her once-high grades plummeted, and she forgot the names of letters and numbers in both English and Spanish. She and her 9-year-old brother struggled to sleep and asked constantly about their dad, wondering if he was taken because they’d done something wrong.

    “Why is this happening to us?” they asked her. “We’re good. We’re studying.”

    Noemi’s youngest daughter went back to crawling for three months, even though she’d already learned to walk before her father was taken. The little girl would cry out in her sleep, “Pa! Pa!”

    Sofia Mendoza, a therapist who works with immigrant families at a community clinic in Los Angeles County, said separated children can experience a form of grief. It’s hard for them to come to terms with their parent’s absence because the parent is still alive, but not with them. This can disrupt the child’s bond with that parent and their ability to form trusting relationships in the future, she said.

    Many children also become extremely anxious, angry, and fearful, Mendoza said. Young children often complain of physical symptoms such as stomachaches, develop separation anxiety, and regress to earlier behaviors like bed-wetting. Older children may have panic attacks, nightmares, and difficulty focusing, Mendoza said. Caregiver loss is also associated with increased risk of suicide and substance use in children.

    Norma Gómez, a project manager for the Mixteco Indigena Community Organizing Project in Oxnard, said after immigration raids shook the community last summer, her 9-year-old daughter refused to go to school for a week and was afraid to leave her mom and dad, even though they’re legal U.S. residents. She’d seen other kids at school crying because family members had been detained. Gómez showed her daughter their U.S. residency documents to reassure her. The child asked to make copies for her classmates, hoping they would protect them too.

    “Time to be an adult”

    Back in East Los Angeles, Damian is living with one of his aunts and struggling to adapt to not having his father around. He said his grades have dropped because he can’t focus in school. He no longer wants to do things he used to enjoy with his dad, such as going out to eat.

    “Fun is over,” he said. “It’s time to be an adult right now.”

    Damian Zermeño helps his aunts make lunch at his home in East Los Angeles. Since his father was deported, Damian says, he’s learned to be more independent, but he still misses his dad and often feels sad, worried, or angry. Karla Gachet for KFF Health News

    Being without his father has forced Damian to become more independent, he and his aunt Claudia Zermeño said. Before, his dad did almost everything for him. Now, Damian does his own laundry, helps with housework, and styles his own hair. He’s protective of his aunts, who are both devastated by their brother’s absence; he hugs them frequently and tells jokes to try to cheer them up. He doesn’t want to upset them more by showing his own sadness.

    Damian receives therapy both in and outside of school. He said he’s learned breathing exercises that have helped, but he still feels sad and worried a lot of the time. Sometimes he feels angry.

    “I try my hardest to think, to stay focused,” he said. “But with everything that’s going on, I can’t keep the facade of ‘everything’s normal’ when I feel heartbroken.”

    Saúl Zermeño, now living in Guadalajara, said he’s worried about his son’s health. Damian has a genetic condition called neurofibromatosis Type 1, which causes tumors to grow on nerve tissue in his body, including one in his head that, if not checked regularly by a doctor and monitored by his family, could interfere with his brain. He also suffers from epilepsy and was born with only one kidney, which means he tires easily and doesn’t play sports. Saúl is afraid his son won’t get the care he needs without him there. As Damian’s legal guardian, Claudia Zermeño is doing everything she can for him, but she has two children of her own and is also caring for her mother, who has neurological problems from a stroke.

    Damian talks with his dad as often as he can. He hopes to visit his father in Mexico, but he doesn’t have a passport and, as a minor under 16, there are more requirements to get one without his dad present. Saúl is working with an attorney to get permission to legally return to the U.S., but the process is complicated and uncertain.

    So, for now, Damian’s hanging on to hope that his dad will be allowed to return and is trying to become the man he believes he should be. He’s making plans to get his driver’s license when he turns 16 this month. He’s given up his goal of going to college and instead wants to get a job right after high school to help his aunts and send money to his dad.

    He still cries, but only when he’s alone in his room.

    _KFF Health News_is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at_KFF_— the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism._

湘ICP备2026001899号-2