分类： 未分类

美伊谈判未定 伊朗：未与美方安排任何会谈

2026年6月30日 22:53 / 联合早报

黎巴嫩总统奥恩（右）周一（6月29日）在贝鲁特会见美军中央司令部司令库珀将军（左二）。 （法新社）

（华盛顿／德黑兰综合电）美国和伊朗本周分别派代表到卡塔尔首都多哈，但伊朗表明，前去多哈的是负责跟进美伊谅解备忘录的技术代表团，未来几天不会同美国举行任何级别的谈判。

美国总统特朗普日前称，美伊代表将于本周在多哈会谈。不过，伊朗外交部发言人巴加埃星期一（6月29日）告诉媒体，伊方尚未进入最终协议谈判阶段，并未与美方安排任何会谈。

卡塔尔外交部发言人星期二（30日）也说，美国和伊朗并无计划在多哈直接会谈，而美国总统特朗普的特使维特科夫和女婿库什纳当天在多哈是与卡塔尔调解员会面。

伊朗一名官员则透露，美伊技术团队将在星期三（7月1日）分别同卡塔尔和巴基斯坦的调停官员会面。

巴加埃周一说，伊朗当前的重点是确保美伊谅解备忘录相关条款得到执行。他指出，谅解备忘录第10条涉及的石油销售问题，美方已签发必要许可。至于第11条涉及的解冻伊朗资产问题，相关执行进程也在推进中，而前往多哈的伊朗专家代表团将负责跟进相关事项。

美国和伊朗预留至少60天，以逐步落实谅解备忘录的14项条款。然而，进展一直断断续续，双方互相指责对方违反协议，也互相攻击，使得脆弱的停火协议愈发岌岌可危。

伊朗称周一与阿曼首次开会谈海峡管理

此外，伊朗副外长加里巴巴迪周一在社交媒体发文说，伊朗与阿曼当天在阿曼首都马斯喀特举行了关于管理霍尔木兹海峡的首次会议。

伊朗和阿曼都声称拥有这条国际重要航道的主权。加里巴巴迪说，双方就未来如何管理海峡交换了意见，也达成共识，并指阿曼也认为应该根据所提供的服务收取费用。两国据说已决定就此成立技术委员会。

霍尔木兹海峡的控制权一直处于混乱状态。伊朗近日不断重申它控制着霍尔木兹海峡，并且警告所有船只必须按照伊方划出的通行航线航行，否则将被对付。

自美国与伊朗上周爆发新一轮互击后，船只近日纷纷避开阿曼外海的航行通道，霍尔木兹海峡周末的通行量急剧下降。

研究机构HFI Research称，上星期天（28日）只有四艘油轮和一艘集装箱船在美国海军的护航下，经由阿曼南部水域通道进入波斯湾。航运分析公司Kpler的数据则显示，当天没有船只经此通道离开波斯湾。

以防长：可能随时与伊朗爆发冲突

另一方面，以色列国防部长卡茨周一受访时说，鉴于复杂的安全局势和在黎巴嫩的军事行动，以色列随时可能再同伊朗爆发冲突。

以色列媒体报道，卡茨列举两种可能重启战争的情况：一是特朗普认为美伊停火谈判破裂，不会有成果；二是伊朗攻击以色列。

卡茨说，以色列军方已做好防御和进攻的两手准备，如果以方发现有真实的危险，将发起攻击。

针对黎巴嫩局势，卡茨重申以军在黎巴嫩真主党解除武装之前，不会撤退。

黎巴嫩总统奥恩周一在贝鲁特会见美军中央司令部司令库珀将军，讨论美以黎上周签署的三方框架协议。

奥恩说，黎巴嫩打算在全国范围内行使主权，并将军队部署至紧邻以色列边境的地区。

库珀周一还与黎巴嫩武装部队总司令海卡尔会晤，双方讨论黎巴嫩最新局势发展。

根据三方框架协议，黎巴嫩真主党将被解除武装，而这个任务由黎巴嫩武装部队执行。

获得伊朗支持的真主党强烈反对三方协议，指这出卖黎巴嫩的主权，使以色列占领黎巴嫩合法化。真主党要员已警告，如果把协议强加于他们，黎巴嫩国内可能爆发冲突。

Supreme Court strikes down coordinated campaign spending limits

2026-06-30 10:28 EDT / CBS News

By

Updated on: June 30, 2026 / 11:11 AM EDT / CBS News

Washington — The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down federal limits on the amount of money a political committee can spend in coordination with federal candidates, further unwinding restrictions on the flow of money into congressional campaigns just months ahead of the midterm elections.

In the case National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, the court divided 6-3 along ideological lines in finding that the caps on what are called coordinated party expenditures violate the First Amendment.

The decision joins a line of recent rulings from the court’s conservative majority that have invalidated campaign finance limits on the grounds that they restrict political speech.

In an opinion authored by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the high court’s conservative majority said its decision “treats all political parties equally. It will allow all political parties — including the DNC and RNC and the respective Senate and House campaign committees, as well as other parties and party committees — to participate more freely and compete more fully in the political process, and to coordinate more closely with their candidates.”

At the center of the case were limits imposed by Congress through the Federal Election Campaign Act, which was passed to regulate the financing of federal campaigns. In the 2026 election cycle, party committees can spend between $65,300 and $130,600 in coordination with congressional campaigns, and between $130,600 and $4 million with Senate candidates, according to the FEC. Congress amended the law in 2014 to allow unlimited coordinated spending on certain activities, such as election-recount lawsuits or other legal proceedings.

In 2022, then-Senate candidate JD Vance, then-Rep. Steve Chabot of Ohio and two Republican committees filed a lawsuit challenging the spending limits as violations of the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause. A federal appeals court upheld the caps, citing a 2001 Supreme Court ruling that had left an earlier version of the limits intact.

But in the 25 years since that ruling, the composition of the high court changed considerably. It now has a 6-3 conservative majority.

When the dispute arrived at the high court, the FEC under the Trump administration joined with the Republicans in urging the justices to strike down the caps. Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued the limits violate the First Amendment by restricting parties’ right to engage in political speech in coordination with their candidates.

The court appointed an outside lawyer, Roman Martinez, to argue in defense of the limits. Democratic campaign committees also urged the Supreme Court to uphold the caps.

Since 2010, the Supreme Court has issued a series of rulings knocking down campaign finance restrictions. In the landmark case Citizens United v. FEC, decided that year, the high court struck down prohibitions on political spending by corporations. Then, in 2014, the Supreme Court invalidated the limit on the amount of money a donor could contribute to federal candidates in a two-year election cycle.

Its latest decision came in 2022 in a case involving Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican. In that ruling, the high court said a cap on the amount of post-election contributions that can be used to repay a candidate who loaned their campaign money was unconstitutional.

Republicans and Democrats react to ruling

Democrats criticized the ruling as weakening safeguards against corruption in elections, while Republican leaders applauded the court’s decision on free speech grounds.

“This is a decisive First Amendment victory and a major win for the integrity of our political system,” NRCC Chair Rep. Richard Hudson and NRSC Chair Sen. Tim Scott said in a statement. “The Supreme Court made clear that the federal government has no authority to place arbitrary limits on how political parties support the candidates they nominate. By striking down these unconstitutional caps on coordinated spending, the Court has restored core political speech and ensured parties can compete on a level playing field.”

They added, “We are ready to fully support our candidates and put them in the strongest possible position to win in 2026 and beyond.”

President Trump, in a social media post, declared it “A BIG WIN FOR REPUBLICANS and, more importantly, The First Amendment!”

Meanwhile, Democratic Party leaders called the ruling “a win for billionaire donors and special interests who want more influence over the GOP agenda and an invitation for corruption.”

“Republicans have failed the American people with a record that has ripped away health care and raised costs on families, and they know voters will hold them accountable in November — which is exactly why they are rewriting the rules in an effort to drown out the will of the voters by flooding elections with more money from their billionaire backers,” said the statement from DSCC Chair Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, DCCC Chair Rep. Suzan DelBene and DNC Chair Ken Martin.

“Democrats are fighting back for the American people, and in November, voters will reject Republicans’ toxic agenda and efforts to rig the system and weaken our democracy by electing a Democratic House and Senate majority,” they said.

美伊谈判未定 伊朗：未与美方安排任何会谈

2026年6月30日 22:53 / 联合早报

黎巴嫩总统奥恩（右）周一（6月29日）在贝鲁特会见美军中央司令部司令库珀将军（左二）。 （法新社）

（华盛顿／德黑兰综合电）美国和伊朗本周分别派代表到卡塔尔首都多哈，但伊朗表明，前去多哈的是负责跟进美伊谅解备忘录的技术代表团，未来几天不会同美国举行任何级别的谈判。

美国总统特朗普日前称，美伊代表将于本周在多哈会谈。不过，伊朗外交部发言人巴加埃星期一（6月29日）告诉媒体，伊方尚未进入最终协议谈判阶段，并未与美方安排任何会谈。

卡塔尔外交部发言人星期二（30日）也说，美国和伊朗并无计划在多哈直接会谈，而美国总统特朗普的特使维特科夫和女婿库什纳当天在多哈是与卡塔尔调解员会面。

伊朗一名官员则透露，美伊技术团队将在星期三（7月1日）分别同卡塔尔和巴基斯坦的调停官员会面。

巴加埃周一说，伊朗当前的重点是确保美伊谅解备忘录相关条款得到执行。他指出，谅解备忘录第10条涉及的石油销售问题，美方已签发必要许可。至于第11条涉及的解冻伊朗资产问题，相关执行进程也在推进中，而前往多哈的伊朗专家代表团将负责跟进相关事项。

美国和伊朗预留至少60天，以逐步落实谅解备忘录的14项条款。然而，进展一直断断续续，双方互相指责对方违反协议，也互相攻击，使得脆弱的停火协议愈发岌岌可危。

伊朗称周一与阿曼首次开会谈海峡管理

此外，伊朗副外长加里巴巴迪周一在社交媒体发文说，伊朗与阿曼当天在阿曼首都马斯喀特举行了关于管理霍尔木兹海峡的首次会议。

伊朗和阿曼都声称拥有这条国际重要航道的主权。加里巴巴迪说，双方就未来如何管理海峡交换了意见，也达成共识，并指阿曼也认为应该根据所提供的服务收取费用。两国据说已决定就此成立技术委员会。

霍尔木兹海峡的控制权一直处于混乱状态。伊朗近日不断重申它控制着霍尔木兹海峡，并且警告所有船只必须按照伊方划出的通行航线航行，否则将被对付。

自美国与伊朗上周爆发新一轮互击后，船只近日纷纷避开阿曼外海的航行通道，霍尔木兹海峡周末的通行量急剧下降。

研究机构HFI Research称，上星期天（28日）只有四艘油轮和一艘集装箱船在美国海军的护航下，经由阿曼南部水域通道进入波斯湾。航运分析公司Kpler的数据则显示，当天没有船只经此通道离开波斯湾。

以防长：可能随时与伊朗爆发冲突

另一方面，以色列国防部长卡茨周一受访时说，鉴于复杂的安全局势和在黎巴嫩的军事行动，以色列随时可能再同伊朗爆发冲突。

以色列媒体报道，卡茨列举两种可能重启战争的情况：一是特朗普认为美伊停火谈判破裂，不会有成果；二是伊朗攻击以色列。

卡茨说，以色列军方已做好防御和进攻的两手准备，如果以方发现有真实的危险，将发起攻击。

针对黎巴嫩局势，卡茨重申以军在黎巴嫩真主党解除武装之前，不会撤退。

黎巴嫩总统奥恩周一在贝鲁特会见美军中央司令部司令库珀将军，讨论美以黎上周签署的三方框架协议。

奥恩说，黎巴嫩打算在全国范围内行使主权，并将军队部署至紧邻以色列边境的地区。

库珀周一还与黎巴嫩武装部队总司令海卡尔会晤，双方讨论黎巴嫩最新局势发展。

根据三方框架协议，黎巴嫩真主党将被解除武装，而这个任务由黎巴嫩武装部队执行。

获得伊朗支持的真主党强烈反对三方协议，指这出卖黎巴嫩的主权，使以色列占领黎巴嫩合法化。真主党要员已警告，如果把协议强加于他们，黎巴嫩国内可能爆发冲突。

Supreme Court lifts Watergate-era caps on campaign spending

2026-06-30 10:26 AM ET / CNN

By Fredreka Schouten, John Fritze

Updated Jun 30, 2026, 11:35 AM ET

PUBLISHED Jun 30, 2026, 10:26 AM ET

The U.S. Supreme Court on June 29, 2026.

Cheney Orr/Reuters

The Supreme Court on Tuesday lifted a Watergate-era cap on how much money political parties may spend in coordination with candidates, siding with Republicans in a case initially filed by then-Senate candidate JD Vance that experts say could ultimately benefit the GOP in this year’s midterm election.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the opinion for a 6-3 conservative-liberal court.

In the opinion, Kavanaugh wrote that keeping limits in place could “help consign political parties to continued second-tier status as compared to outside groups.”

“Weakened political parties distort the political system,” he added.

The dissent of the court’s liberals, written by Justice Elena Kagan, blasted the Supreme Court for another decision that dismantles campaign finance reforms.

“I’m not sure what to call a remnant of a remnant, but that is what the Court has left today,” she wrote, warning that the legal regime created by the rulings is “increasingly unable to stop political corruption, and thus to preserve our institutions’ democratic legitimacy.”

Since the 1970s, political party committees, such as the fundraising arm of Senate Republicans, have been capped at how much money they may spend in coordination with a campaign. That has pushed a flood of campaign money toward super PACs, which have no spending limits but are unable to run their advertising and other messages past the candidate they want to help.

In 2022, Vance and several party committees — including the National Republican Senatorial Committee — challenged the law as a violation of the First Amendment. From the beginning, they appeared to have the upper hand at the 6-3 conservative court.

The majority has in recent years repeatedly invalidated campaign regulations. Several years ago, the court struck down a limit on campaigns’ ability to use post-election funds to repay loans made by candidates. In 2014, the court eliminated limits on how much donors could give to all candidates and parties in aggregate during a two-year period. Four years before that, the court handed down its decision in Citizens United v. FEC, which allowed corporations to spend unlimited sums in candidate elections.

Republicans argued that the caps on coordinated party spending were hopelessly out of step with the court’s modern approach to campaign finance law. And they asserted in briefing that the law “harmed our political system by leading donors to send their funds elsewhere,” such as super PACs.

Related article In this October 2020 photo, Jim Slowikowski oversees the unloading of pallets filled with Washington and Oregon mail-in ballots at a US Postal Service processing and distribution center in Portland, Oregon. Nathan Howard/Getty Images The Supreme Court handed Trump an election case defeat. Is a bigger win for him coming? 6 min read

Financial advantage

Even before the court’s decision was handed down, Republicans entered the election year with a substantial financial advantage over Democrats. The Republican Party has had significantly more cash on hand than the Democratic National Committee in recent disclosure reports.

In recent cycles, however, individual Democratic candidates in key races for Congress typically have outraised Republicans, powered by small-dollar donations. The ruling paves the way for Republican campaign committees to counter Democratic candidates’ longstanding grassroots fundraising edge.

Both Democrats and Republicans have been preparing for the ruling and looking for ways to capitalize on it — although they have been reluctant to telegraph their specific strategies publicly, according to strategists. But the impact of the court’s decision already has been felt by political operatives in Washington.

As they prepared for a new fundraising landscape, some party committees held off on establishing and hiring staff and consultants for so-called “independent expenditure” operations — arms that are firewalled from political parties’ day-to-day functions to focus on advertising in the most competitive races.

What voters will likely see is a flood of new political commercials this year, as party committees race to seize on their newfound ability to work directly with candidates and take advantage of lower advertising rates that broadcasters must offer to candidates close to Election Day under federal law.

This story has been updated with additional information.

CNN’s Tierney Sneed contributed to this report.

联合国：埃博拉可能让非洲损失36亿美元

2026年6月30日 23:57 / 联合早报

5月21日，刚果民主共和国的医护人员正在接收一名感染埃博拉的患者。 （路透社）

联合国星期二（6月30日）说，埃博拉疫情可能给非洲造成高达36亿美元的损失，导致数十万人失业，甚至可能引发发展危机。

路透社报道，刚果民主共和国政府称，自5月15日宣布爆发埃博拉疫情以来，目前已有1307人感染、377人死亡。

这次疫情的源头是邦迪布焦埃博拉病毒株，目前尚无针对它的疫苗或治疗方法。

乌干达报告的病例数量远少于刚果，专家警告称，疫情有可能蔓延至其他邻国，例如南苏丹。

联合国开发计划署驻刚果代表马马说：“如果我们拥有足够的资源并加大力度，就能控制疫情，防止进一步的损失。”

“如果我们不采取行动，这场突发公共卫生事件就有可能演变成一场影响整个区域乃至整个非洲大陆的更加严重且旷日持久的发展危机。”

联合国开发计划署概述了应对疫情的三种方案。报告指出，在疫情控制在两国范围内的最佳情况下，刚果（金）的国内生产总值损失为10亿美元（约13亿新元）。

在疫情蔓延至卢旺达和安哥拉等国的情况下，加上伊朗危机导致的燃料价格上涨，非洲大陆的国内生产总值将减少36亿美元，并造成32.8万人失业。

联合国：埃博拉可能让非洲损失36亿美元

2026年6月30日 23:57 / 联合早报

5月21日，刚果民主共和国的医护人员正在接收一名感染埃博拉的患者。 （路透社）

联合国星期二（6月30日）说，埃博拉疫情可能给非洲造成高达36亿美元的损失，导致数十万人失业，甚至可能引发发展危机。

路透社报道，刚果民主共和国政府称，自5月15日宣布爆发埃博拉疫情以来，目前已有1307人感染、377人死亡。

这次疫情的源头是邦迪布焦埃博拉病毒株，目前尚无针对它的疫苗或治疗方法。

乌干达报告的病例数量远少于刚果，专家警告称，疫情有可能蔓延至其他邻国，例如南苏丹。

联合国开发计划署驻刚果代表马马说：“如果我们拥有足够的资源并加大力度，就能控制疫情，防止进一步的损失。”

“如果我们不采取行动，这场突发公共卫生事件就有可能演变成一场影响整个区域乃至整个非洲大陆的更加严重且旷日持久的发展危机。”

联合国开发计划署概述了应对疫情的三种方案。报告指出，在疫情控制在两国范围内的最佳情况下，刚果（金）的国内生产总值损失为10亿美元（约13亿新元）。

在疫情蔓延至卢旺达和安哥拉等国的情况下，加上伊朗危机导致的燃料价格上涨，非洲大陆的国内生产总值将减少36亿美元，并造成32.8万人失业。

Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, striking down Trump’s order

June 30, 2026 / 11:26 AM EDT / CBS News

Washington — The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down President Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship, reaffirming the more than 100-year-old understanding that nearly all of those born in the United States are citizens.

In a divided decision in the case Trump v. Barbara, the Supreme Court split 6-3 in finding that Mr. Trump’s policy is unlawful. Five of the justices — Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson — agreed that Mr. Trump’s executive order violates the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote separately to say he believes the order violates federal law.

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented.

With the decision, the Supreme Court has now invalidated a second of Mr. Trump’s signature initiatives from his second term, joining its ruling striking down many of his tariffs in February. The president signed his directive aiming to restrict birthright citizenship on his first day back in the White House as part of a sweeping crackdown on immigration.

“Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights — to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land,’” Roberts wrote in the majority opinion. “We keep that promise today.”

Thomas, joined by Gorsuch, argued that the majority’s account of the history of the rule for American citizenship “is not historically accurate.”

“The Court today takes the extraordinary step of holding facially unconstitutional the President’s Order excluding from citizenship the children of foreign temporary visitors and illegal aliens,” he wrote. “In doing so, the Court adds to the sad history of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was designed and understood to secure equal rights for the freed blacks but has instead been repurposed for political projects that the Reconstruction Congress did not support.”

Trump’s order

A cornerstone of Mr. Trump’s immigration agenda, his executive order sought to deny automatic American citizenship to babies born to parents in the country illegally or temporarily. The order would have upended the long-held interpretation of the Constitution’s Citizenship Clause as granting citizenship to almost all people born in the U.S.

But the directive never took effect, since it was blocked by every federal court that examined it.

The Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” Congress codified that language in federal immigration law, first in 1940 through the Nationality Act, and again in 1952 in the Immigration and Nationality Act.

The Supreme Court considered the meaning of the clause in a landmark case in 1898 and affirmed the rule of citizenship by birth, with rare exceptions for the children of foreign diplomats, occupying armies and members of Native American tribes. Congress in 1924 enacted legislation conferring citizenship on all Native Americans born in the U.S.

Mr. Trump’s executive order sought to change the long-held definition of who is an American. The president and his administration argued that unrestricted birthright citizenship has served as a powerful incentive for illegal immigration and birth tourism. They said the Citizenship Clause has been misread since the mid-20th century.

While the administration said Mr. Trump’s measure would have applied only prospectively, the effects would have been far-reaching. An estimated 250,000 babies born in the U.S. would be denied citizenship each year under the executive order, according to the Migration Policy Institute and Penn State’s Population Research Institute.

In a sign of the case’s importance to Mr. Trump, he attended the oral arguments in April, becoming the first sitting president in modern history to view such proceedings at the high court. Still, the president indicated in social media posts across the past few months that he believed he may not prevail before the Supreme Court.

Mr. Trump’s executive order was met almost immediately with legal challenges in courts across the country. Judges in New Hampshire, Washington, Massachusetts and Maryland quickly blocked enforcement of the policy nationwide.

The Trump administration pursued emergency appeals of those decisions, eventually landing the issue before the Supreme Court last year. But those cases involved the scope of the lower court orders, known as nationwide injunctions, and not the legality of Mr. Trump’s effort to limit birthright citizenship.

After the high court curbed lower courts’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions, another challenge was filed in New Hampshire on behalf of all children who would be covered by the birthright citizenship policy. It was that case that landed before the high court, though in this instance, the justices weighed whether it violated federal law or the Constitution.

AI让诈骗更逼真 网安局：钓鱼攻击举报跌两成未必反映实况

2026年6月30日 19:28 / 联合早报

AI摘要

• 去年本地通报网络钓鱼攻击减少21%，但网安局指实际规模可能被低估，因许多无财务损失案件未通报。
• 诈骗分子利用生成式AI制作高仿真语音、视频、电邮及网站，提升诈骗逼真度与成功率。
• 受感染系统与设备激增142%，中小企业仍是勒索软件主要目标；家用路由器须于2027年底前符合更高安全标准。
• 专家预警未来三年AI将成网络安全关键变量，公众须提高警惕，通过可信渠道核实可疑请求。

本摘要由AI辅助生成，仅供参考

本地去年通报的钓鱼攻击虽减少21%，但新加坡网络安全局指出，这一数据或低估真实规模，因为不少未造成财务损失的案件没通报。越来越多诈骗分子也利用生成式AI制作高仿真的诈骗内容，包括电邮、网站甚至语音，大幅提升攻击成功率。 （档案照片）

本地去年通报的网络钓鱼攻击虽减少约两成，但新加坡网络安全局指出，许多案件可能没有通报，实际情况可能更严峻。

与此同时，诈骗分子不断演变手法，借助人工智能（AI）生成语音克隆和深伪（deepfake）视频等内容，让诈骗更逼真，也更难识破。

根据网安局星期二（6月30日）发布的最新《新加坡网络概况》报告，本地去年通报约4800起网络钓鱼攻击，较前一年的约6100起，减少21%。

在假冒的行业中，银行和金融服务业连续四年居首，占所有通报案件约七成，其次是政府机构和物流业。

尽管举报数字下降，报告强调，这并不代表网络钓鱼活动减少。网安局指出，由于不少未造成财务损失的案件没有通报，因此统计数字可能让人们低估网络钓鱼活动的真实规模。

当局也提醒，越来越多诈骗分子利用生成式AI制作高仿真的诈骗内容，包括电邮、网站甚至语音，并开发可绕过多重身份验证的工具，配合各种手法，诱导受害者授权付款或更改账户资料。

受感染系统与设备激增142％ 中小企业仍是勒索软件主要目标

去年本地侦测到约28万4300个受感染的网络系统与电子设备，较前一年的11万7300个，激增142%。网安局指出，这主要是因为恶意活动持续活跃，加上侦测能力提升。

为加强相关设备的保安，当局规定，所有在本地出售的家用路由器，最迟须在2027年底符合网络安全标签计划第二级标准，包括采用更强的身份验证机制，以及更安全的数据储存方式。

在勒索软件方面，本地去年通报165起案件，较2024年的159起增加约4%。由于网络安全能力和资源相对有限，中小企业仍是主要受害群体。

至于遭恶意窜改的网站，则由2024年的67个减至去年的62个。

网安局局长许智贤指出，网络威胁日益复杂、AI及量子科技迅速发展，当局须比攻击者更快一步，加强系统防护、及早发现漏洞并完成修补。

他也说，网安局正与国际伙伴及业界加强合作，确保快速发展的新技术能提升整体网络安全，而非削弱防护能力。

“政府、企业与公众须携手合作，在推动数码创新的同时，建立兼具信任与安全的网络环境。”

专家：未来三年 AI将成为影响网安形势关键因素

微软新加坡首席安全官庄振忠受访时说，网络安全不再只是资讯科技人员面对的问题，而是与民众日常生活息息相关。

他说：“网络威胁已渗透银行服务、电子支付、通讯及政府服务等各个层面，新加坡作为高度数码化的经济体，尤其容易受到影响。”

他预计，未来三年，AI将成为影响网络安全形势的关键因素。随着生成式AI普及，诈骗分子可在短时间内制作大量逼真的诈骗内容，大幅提升诈骗的规模与效果。

“公众经常接获冒充政府机构、银行、物流公司或电商平台的诈骗信息。与过去不同的是，这些信息不仅语句通顺、内容贴近现实情境，甚至会配合报税季或大型网购活动等时间点，让公众更容易上当。”

他强调，诈骗手法越趋精密，公众不能单靠科技防御，更须提高警惕与判断力。“对于任何突如其来的请求，应通过已知且可信的渠道核实，不要因对方制造紧迫感而仓促行动。”

Probe into ‘subversive’ anti-AI Singham network is ‘enormous,’ former Treasury advisor says

New report links Singham-backed activists to campaigns that stalled $23.6B in AI and data center investment across 14 states

2026-06-30T06:00:06-04:00 / Fox News

By Asra Q. Nomani Fox News

Published June 30, 2026 6:00am EDT | Updated June 30, 2026 7:21am EDT

Singham funding one of ‘most subversive political networks’ in America: former senior Treasury advisor

Sam Lyman, a former speech writer for Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, says a Department of Justice probe into Singham network is an “enormous development.” Now head of research at the Bitcoin Policy Institute, he says activists from the Singham network have played a major role in organizing nationwide protests against AI and data center projects.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/8809e0e2-e8ba-4b14-9d04-a7809642d12d

Listen to this article

7 min

FIRST ON FOX: Former Treasury senior advisor and chief speechwriter Sam Lyman says the Southern District of New York’s investigation into the finances behind the activist network tied to American Marxist businessman Neville Roy Singham marks one of the most significant developments yet in the federal government’s scrutiny of the organization and far-left protests in the U.S.

“It’s an enormous development because it’s one of the first legal actions that’s taking a deeper look into this network, which is among the most subversive political networks here in the United States, period,” Lyman told Fox News Digital.

Lyman was reacting to Fox News Digital’s exclusive report that U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton from the Southern District of New York has opened a grand jury investigation into the finances behind Singham’s sprawling activist network.

The former Treasury official, who now serves as head of research at the Bitcoin Policy Institute, released a new report on Monday, first obtained by Fox News Digital, examining the Singham network’s role in organizing opposition to artificial intelligence infrastructure and data center development across the country.

DOJ LAUNCHES GRAND JURY PROBE INTO MARXIST MOGUL NEVILLE ROY SINGHAM’S FUNDING OF LEFTIST GROUPS

Video

Researchers conclude that about $23.6 billion in proposed AI and data center investment has been delayed, scaled back or blocked in campaigns where Party for Socialism and Liberation served as “a critical mobilizer in efforts that delayed, scaled back, or blocked the proposed AI infrastructure investment.”

“What we’ve uncovered is that Neville Singham’s network, in particular the Party for Socialism and Liberation, has been boots on the ground in dozens of protests across the country targeting data centers,” Lyman said.

According to the report, the Party for Socialism and Liberation, which has emerged in the past decade as a key political and activist arm of the Singham network, has developed a nationwide organizing operation that has participated in 21 campaigns across 14 states opposing AI infrastructure projects.

The report documents 19 case studies involving cities and counties including: Charlotte, N.C.; Prince George’s County, Md. DeForest, Wisc.; Monterey Park, Calif.; Denver, Co.; Tucson, Ariz.; Athens, Ga.; Durham, N.C.; Madison, Wisc.; New Orleans; Cleveland and other locations.

According to the report, those campaigns resulted in 10 local data center moratoria, one permanent data center ban and four rejected or withdrawn projects. The authors note that the figure likely understates the total impact because several additional campaigns involved projects whose investment values were never publicly disclosed.

REPORT: CHINESE PROPAGANDA, SINGHAM NETWORK, FOREIGN DARK MONEY LINKED TO CAMPAIGNS AGAINST DATA CENTERS

Bitcoin Policy Institute releases a map of protests against data centers by activists from the Party for Socialism and Liberation, a part of the network funded by American Marxist tycoon Neville Roy Singham.(Bitcoin Policy Institute)

The report argues that while many residents have legitimate concerns over water use, electricity demand and land use, activists linked to the Singham network have built a sophisticated nationwide operation that amplifies those concerns through coordinated organizing, demonstrations and political pressure.

“The American opposition to data centers is real and mostly homegrown,” the report states. “But an organized, foreign-aligned party has worked to amplify and convert genuine grievances into actions that slow or degrade America’s buildout of data centers.”

One of the report’s featured examples is Charlotte, N.C., where it says Party for Socialism and Liberation organizers canvassed neighborhoods, circulated petitions and helped organize demonstrations before the City Council unanimously approved a 150-day moratorium on new data centers. According to the report, organizers are now pushing for a permanent ban.

In Prince George’s County, Md., researchers say the Party for Socialism and Liberation chapter in Washington, D.C., helped organize town halls, canvass neighborhoods and gather more than 20,000 petition signatures opposing Lerner Enterprises’ proposed $5 billion Brightseat Tech Park. County officials later paused data center approvals while reviewing local policy.

SEN. TOM COTTON URGES DOJ TO PROBE CHINESE BID TO ‘KNEECAP’ AMERICAN AI

As a network of organizations supported by far-left activist Jodie Evans (second from left) and her husband Neville Roy Singham (right) protest America’s AI development, data centers and other technology advancements, Sen. Tom Cotton (left) sends a letter to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, urging him to investigate the groups for possible violations of the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA).(Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images, Dave Kotinsky/Getty Images)

The report also highlights DeForest, Wisc., where it says Party for Socialism and Liberation organizers joined local residents opposing Blackstone-backed QTS’ proposed $12 billion hyperscale data center campus. Following months of public opposition, village officials declared the proposal “not feasible,” leading the developer to withdraw the project.

In Southern California, the report says the Los Angeles chapter of Party for Socialism and Liberation participated in the “No Data Centers SGV” coalition, which organized petitions, public meetings and a ballot initiative culminating in California’s first permanent municipal ban on new data centers in Monterey Park. According to the report, the coalition also influenced neighboring cities to adopt additional restrictions or temporary moratoria.

Researchers further cite campaigns in Arizona opposing Amazon’s proposed $3.6 billion Project Blue near Tucson and a separate $2 billion AI data center proposal in Chandler, both of which encountered significant setbacks following organized opposition.

The report argues that the campaign against AI infrastructure is only one part of a broader effort by organizations linked to Singham.

“The common thread in all of these nonprofit organizations is that they agitate against American causes—what they call American empire,” Lyman said.

NETWORK FUNDED BY PRO-CCP TECH TYCOON TARGETS PALANTIR AMID ANTI-US PROTESTS THAT SUPPORT THE REGIME IN IRAN

Video

“After Oct. 7, these nonprofit networks and their political affiliates were boots on the ground protesting Israel and any action Israel took in Gaza. They did the exact same thing when President Trump took office and started enforcing immigration laws. Now we’re seeing the exact same thing take place against the technology industry here in the United States.”

As reported by Fox News Digital, nonprofits funded by Singham — including CodePink, Tricontinental, People’s Dispatch and Liberation News — have spent years publishing material opposing American AI development and criticizing leading technology companies including Palantir, Google, Amazon and Meta.

Lyman said the network’s organizing capacity has made it an increasingly influential political force.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Bitcoin Policy Institute releases a flowchart on leaders in the Party for Socialism and Liberation active in the effort to stop data center projects.(Bitcoin Policy Institute)

“This network is incredibly good at organizing,” he said. “Self-identified socialists in America are incredibly good at getting out the vote, getting their people to protest and getting them to sign petitions.”

He argued that the federal investigation by the Justice Department’s Southern District of New York reflects growing recognition in Washington, D.C., of Singham’s influence.

“Singham essentially is the figurehead who’s funding all of this,” Lyman said. “It makes sense both from a legal perspective and from a policymaking perspective that the American people are starting to take notice of his subversive activities because they are truly prolific.”

The report concludes by calling for greater transparency into the funding behind the Party for Socialism and Liberation and other organizations tied to Singham, arguing that Americans should know who is financing organized campaigns that seek to shape the future of the country’s AI infrastructure.

Fox News Digital’s Mitch Picasso contributed to this report.

Asra Nomani is senior editor of investigations at Fox News Digital. She is a former reporter at the Wall Street Journal, where she covered stories related to money, politics and society. She is the author of “Woke Army: The Left-Green Alliance That Is Undermining America’s Freedom.”_ She can be reached at asra.nomani@fox.com and on X at @asranomani.

河南人大常委会原副主任刘满仓一审判无期徒刑

2026年6月30日 19:38 / 联合早报

中国河南省人大常委会原副主任刘满仓因涉嫌受贿、利用影响力受贿，星期二（6月30日）被江苏省苏州市中级法院一审公开宣判，决定对刘满仓执行无期徒刑，剥夺政治权利终身，并没收个人全部财产。 （互联网）

中国河南省人大常委会原副主任刘满仓因涉嫌受贿、利用影响力受贿，星期二（6月30日）被江苏省苏州市中级法院一审公开宣判，决定对刘满仓执行无期徒刑，剥夺政治权利终身，并没收个人全部财产。

中国最高法院星期二发布刘满仓被判无期徒刑的消息。苏州中级法院对刘满仓以受贿罪判处无期徒刑，剥夺政治权利终身，并处没收个人全部财产；以利用影响力受贿罪判处有期徒刑十二年，并处罚金200万元（人民币，下同，38.1万新元）。

法院最终决定对刘满仓执行无期徒刑，剥夺政治权利终身，并处没收个人全部财产；对追缴在案的犯罪所得财物及孳息上缴国库，不足部分继续追缴。

公开资料显示，刘满仓生于1955年10月，来自河南西峡，2024年10月被官宣落马。

中共中央纪委国家监委去年4月通报刘满仓被开除党籍。他被指“贪婪腐化，退而不休”“搞迷信活动”“违规收受礼品、礼金、消费卡”等。

经审理查明，1997年至2018年，刘满仓利用任职河南期间多个职务上的便利，以及职权或者地位形成的便利条件，通过其他国家工作人员职务上的行为，为有关单位和个人在项目开发、企业经营、职务提拔等事项上提供帮助。

这些职务涉及中共商丘地委委员、组织部部长，商丘市委常委、组织部部长，商丘市委副书记、市长，商丘市委书记，河南省委常委、副省长，河南省委常委、政法委书记，河南省人大常委会党组副书记、副主任。

1997年至2024年，刘满仓直接或通过其亲属非法收受财物共计折合1.46亿余元。

2019年至2024年，刘满仓退休后利用曾担任河南省人大常委会中共党组副书记、副主任等职权或者地位形成的便利条件，通过其他国家工作人员职务上的行为，为有关单位和个人在土地整治项目上谋取不正当利益，直接或通过其亲属非法收受财物共计折合1.7亿余元。

法院认为，刘满仓的行为构成受贿罪、利用影响力受贿罪。刘满仓受贿数额特别巨大，并使国家和人民利益遭受特别重大损失，应依法惩处；利用影响力受贿数额特别巨大，亦应依法惩处，与其所犯受贿罪并罚。

鉴于刘满仓受贿、利用影响力受贿犯罪中均有未遂情节，归案后如实供述罪行，主动交代监察机关尚未掌握的部分受贿事实，具有重大立功表现，认罪悔罪，积极退赃，犯罪所得财物及孳息绝大部分已追缴到案，具有法定、酌定从宽处罚情节，可对他从轻处罚。法庭遂作出上述判决。

据悉，苏州市中级法院2025年12月4日公开开庭审理了该案。刘满仓当庭表示认罪悔罪。