分类: 未分类

  • 艾尔-赛义德回避关于哈森·皮克竞选关联的问题后遭网络炮轰:“真是‘好伙伴’”


    2026年8月31日 美国东部时间下午2:37 / 福克斯新闻

    这位民主党参议院候选人将皮克斥为“来自加利福尼亚的一名普通主播”,尽管后者曾多次现身竞选活动

    作者:基拉·麦克唐纳、安德鲁·马克·米勒、彼得·达布罗萨、保罗·施陶瑟 福克斯新闻

    密歇根州民主党参议院候选人阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德谈支持者哈森·皮克:“我不想和你们讨论加利福尼亚的一名Twitch主播”

    密歇根州民主党参议院候选人阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德认为,记者们在询问有争议的主播哈森·皮克相关问题时“抓错了重点”。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/dbaa9b58-3a8c-4be6-a4e8-04e3f02867b6

    收听本文
    3分钟

    民主党参议院候选人阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德因回避与极左翼主播哈森·皮克的关联问题,正面临一波强烈的网络反对声。皮克曾多次现身密歇根州的竞选活动。

    当被问及皮克对其竞选活动的影响时,艾尔-赛义德告诉记者,这场选举关乎密歇根州,他“没兴趣讨论加利福尼亚的一名社交媒体人士”。

    “但我真的不想和你们讨论加利福尼亚的一名Twitch主播,”艾尔-赛义德说道,“这不是一场严肃的对话。”

    福克斯新闻数字频道随后追问艾尔-赛义德,既然他如此认为,那当初为何邀请皮克前往密歇根。他对此不予理会,当另一名记者问及他是否会谴责皮克时,他再次坚称皮克只是“来自加利福尼亚的一名普通主播”。

    阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德在主播引发反犹主义舆论风暴后淡化与哈森·皮克的关联

    密歇根州兰辛市,民主党参议院候选人阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德在竞选活动中接受记者采访。(福克斯新闻数字频道/保罗·施陶瑟)

    这段视频在社交媒体上疯传,引发广泛嘲讽,艾尔-赛义德正急于与这位拥有约1000万社交媒体粉丝的主播划清界限。

    作家兼政治评论员斯蒂芬·L·米勒在X平台上发帖称:“太离谱了。他们怕他怕到连问题都不敢问深。”

    “到底谁才是候选人?”米勒在另一篇帖子中写道。

    “情况越来越糟了,”共和党政治战略家凯尔·马廷森在X平台上发帖称。

    “我对此很感兴趣,所以这里面肯定有问题,”《市政厅》高级专栏作家库尔特·施利希特在X平台上发帖称。

    在另一篇X平台帖子中,“查理·柯克秀”执行制片人安德鲁·科尔维特写道:“很明显,阿布勒·艾尔-赛义德慌了。他从和哈森·皮克一起参加六场竞选活动、和他一起拍宣传照,到拒绝提及他的名字,现在只把他说成‘加利福尼亚的某个媒体人士’。真是‘好伙伴’。”

    哈森·皮克坚称阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德曾邀请他为密歇根竞选活动“站台”,反对声浪四起

    2026年8月3日,底特律,一场支持艾尔-赛义德竞选的内容创作者派对上,阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德与主播哈森·皮克在泳池边交谈。(朱莉娅·德马雷·尼基森/美联社照片)

    “他可能比卡玛拉还糟……”福克斯新闻撰稿人乔·孔查在X平台上发帖称。

    亲以色列活动家、慈善家亚当·米尔斯坦也在X平台发帖称:“艾尔-赛义德再次拒绝谴责哈森·皮克——而皮克本人最近已经证实,是艾尔-赛义德邀请他为其竞选活动造势,而非反过来。”

    皮克因过往有争议的言论成为民主党内部日益凸显的争议焦点,其中包括他声称“美国活该遭遇9·11袭击”。

    上周,这名主播一段涉及密歇根州民主党联邦众议员第11选区候选人杰里米·莫斯的争议音频片段引发公愤,艾尔-赛义德随后回应了外界对其与皮克交往的不满。

    “我想明确说明,除了我本人和我的竞选发言人之外,没有人能代表本竞选团队,”艾尔-赛义德在一份声明中说道。

    在密歇根州参议院关键选举前一天,艾尔-赛义德与极左翼主播哈森·皮克亲密互动

    2026年4月7日,密歇根州安阿伯市密歇根大学,一场竞选活动结束后,主播哈森·皮克(左)与阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德(中右)与年轻粉丝自拍。(朱莉娅·德马雷·尼基森/美联社照片)

    尽管艾尔-赛义德试图与皮克划清界限,但这名主播曾公开谈及自己受邀加入竞选活动的经历,他在4月与艾尔-赛义德共同参加的一场集会上表示:“阿卜杜勒邀请我和他一起踏上这场征程时,我当即答应了。”

    在周五接受《塞莫福》专栏作家大卫·韦格尔采访时,皮克称艾尔-赛义德还邀请他为自己的竞选活动“站台”。

    艾尔-赛义德将与共和党参议院候选人迈克·罗杰斯角逐现任民主党参议员加里·彼得斯留下的席位,这场选举可能决定参议院的控制权归属。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    福克斯新闻数字频道已联系艾尔-赛义德的竞选团队置评。

    基拉·麦克唐纳是福克斯新闻数字频道制作助理。

    El-Sayed torched online after brushing off questions about Hasan Piker campaign ties: ‘What a pal’

    August 31, 2026 2:37pm EDT / Fox News

    The Democratic Senate nominee dismissed Piker as ‘a single streamer from California’ despite campaign trail appearances

    By Kiera McDonald, Andrew Mark Miller, Peter D’Abrosca, Paul Steinhauser, Fox News

    Michigan Dem Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed on supporter Hasan Piker: ’I don’t want to have a conversation about a Twitch streamer in California’

    Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic Senate nominee in Michigan, argues reporters are ‘missing the boat’ when asking about controversial streamer Hasan Piker.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/dbaa9b58-3a8c-4be6-a4e8-04e3f02867b6

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed is facing a wave of online blowback after dodging questions about his ties to far-left streamer Hasan Piker, a frequent presence on the campaign trail in Michigan.

    When asked about Piker’s influence on his campaign, El-Sayed told reporters the race is about Michigan and that he is “not interested in a conversation about a social media person in California.”

    “But I don’t want to have a conversation about a Twitch streamer in California,” El-Sayed said. “This is not a serious conversation.”

    Fox News Digital then pressed El-Sayed on why he brought Piker to Michigan if that was the case, which he waved off before doubling down and calling Piker “a single streamer from California” when another reporter asked if he would condemn him.

    ABDUL EL-SAYED PLAYS DOWN HASAN PIKER TIES AFTER STREAMER’S VIRAL ANTISEMITISM FIRESTORM

    Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed speaks to reporters on the campaign trail in Lansing, Michigan.(Fox News Digital/Paul Steinhauser)

    The clip exploded across social media and drew widespread ridicule as El-Sayed scrambles to distance himself from the streamer, who has roughly 10 million social media followers.

    In a post on X, writer and political commentator Stephen L. Miller wrote, “Amazing. They are so terrified of him that she literally jumps in one question deep.”

    “Who is the candidate here?” Miller wrote in another post.

    “This keeps getting worse,” Republican political strategist Kyle Martinsen posted on X.

    “I’m interested in it so there’s a problem here,” Townhall senior columnist Kurt Schlichter posted on X.

    In another post on X, “The Charlie Kirk Show” executive producer Andrew Kolvet wrote, “It’s very clear Abul El Sayed is panicking. He went from doing a half dozen campaign stops with Hasan Piker and taking glamor shots with him, to refusing to say his name. Now he’s just ‘some media person in California.’ What a pal.”

    HASAN PIKER INSISTS ABDUL EL-SAYED ASKED HIM TO ‘STUMP’ FOR MICHIGAN CAMPAIGN AMID BACKLASH

    Abdul El-Sayed talks poolside with streamer Hasan Piker at a party for content creators supporting his campaign, Aug. 3, 2026, in Detroit.(Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Photo)

    “He might be worse than Kamala…,” Fox News contributor Joe Concha posted on X.

    Pro-Israel activist and philanthropist Adam Milstein also wrote in a post on X, “El Sayed again refuses to condemn Hasan Piker — who himself recently confirmed it was El Sayed that asked him to campaign for him, not the reverse.”

    Piker has emerged as a growing flashpoint within the Democratic Party over his past controversial remarks, including his claim that “America deserved 9/11.”

    Last week, El-Sayed responded to outrage over his association with Piker after the streamer’s comments on a viral audio clip involving Jewish Michigan state Sen. Jeremy Moss, the Democratic nominee in the state’s 11th Congressional District, sparked outrage.

    “I want to be crystal clear, nobody speaks for this campaign besides me and my campaign spokespeople,” El-Sayed said in a statement.

    EL-SAYED PALS AROUND WITH FAR-LEFT STREAMER HASAN PIKER THE DAY BEFORE CRUCIAL MICHIGAN SENATE ELECTION

    Streamer Hasan Piker, left, and Abdul El-Sayed, center right, take a selfie with young fans following a campaign event, April 7, 2026, at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Mich.(Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Photo)

    Despite El-Sayed’s attempts to distance himself from Piker, the streamer has spoken openly about his invitation to join the campaign, saying at an April rally with El-Sayed, “The reason why, when Abdul asked for me to come on this journey with him, I said yes, absolutely.”

    In a Friday interview with Semafor columnist David Weigel, Piker said El-Sayed also asked him to “stump” for his campaign.

    El-Sayed will face Republican Senate nominee Mike Rogers for retiring Democratic Sen. Gary Peters’ seat in a race that could determine control of the Senate.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Fox News Digital reached out to El-Sayed’s campaign for comment.

    Kiera McDonald is a Production Assistant for Fox News Digital.

  • 黑客泄露从美国司法部窃取的敏感执法文件


    2026-08-31T17:11:15.798Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    作者:肖恩·林加斯(Sean Lyngaas)

    更新于31分钟前
    更新于美国东部时间2026年8月31日下午3:37
    发布于美国东部时间2026年8月31日下午1:11

    数字安全 联邦机构 俄罗斯

    image

    2022年7月,华盛顿特区烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局(ATF)总部讲台上的该局标识。

    塞缪尔·科鲁姆 摄 / 盖蒂图片社 资料图

    一个疑似操俄语的网络犯罪团伙于周一泄露了其从美国司法部烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局窃取的疑似敏感执法文件。

    据美国有线电视新闻网和一名独立网络安全研究人员对数据的审查,此次泄露的文件似乎包含过往烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局调查目标的信息,以及对他们手机通讯的分析内容。部分文件涉及特定烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局探员以及他们参与的知名案件。

    该研究人员罗恩·法贝拉(Ron Fabela)表示,这批数据涵盖与武装抢劫、纵火、爆炸物案件和凶杀案相关的调查。他还提到,文件中提及的案件有很大一部分属于该局休斯顿外勤分局的工作范畴。

    烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局周一在一份声明中称,目前“无法证实泄露数据的真实性、性质或范围”,该机构正与司法部及其他联邦机构合作,“评估相关情况并采取适当行动”。

    “正如烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局此前所言,受影响的系统并未连接至——且此次事件也未波及——该局其他业务系统。该局履行职责的能力未受影响,”该机构的声明补充道。

    烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局上周首次披露此次黑客攻击事件,称其达到了需要通知国会的“重大”网络安全事件标准。根据联邦法律,“重大”网络事件通常指可能损害美国国家安全、外交政策或经济利益的事件。

    一个名为麒麟(Qilin)的活跃勒索软件团伙此前已宣称对此次入侵负责;周一,该团伙开始在其暗网受害者网站上泄露文件。近年来,该团伙以制造业、零售业和医疗行业为攻击目标,思科公司的网络情报部门因此将其列为“全球范围内最活跃、破坏性最强的勒索软件威胁之一”。

    另一家追踪勒索软件团伙的网络安全公司哈尔西恩(Halcyon)表示,该公司“有高度把握”认定麒麟团伙为俄语使用者。

    此次烟酒火器与爆炸物管理局遭黑客攻击,是联邦机构面临的又一困扰——这些机构本就时常追捕网络犯罪分子。2023年,美国法警局遭遇勒索软件攻击,导致该局调查对象的个人信息泄露。同年,据知情人士透露,黑客入侵了联邦调查局纽约外勤办公室用于调查儿童色情制品图像的计算机系统,其中包括用于存储与杰弗里·爱泼斯坦案相关图像的系统。

    数字安全 联邦机构 俄罗斯

    Hackers leak sensitive law enforcement files stolen from the DOJ

    2026-08-31T17:11:15.798Z / CNN

    By Sean Lyngaas

    Updated 31 min ago

    Updated Aug 31, 2026, 3:37 PM ET

    PUBLISHED Aug 31, 2026, 1:11 PM ET

    Digital security Federal agencies Russia

    The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives logo is seen on a podium at the ATF headquarters in Washington, DC, in July 2022.

    Samuel Corum/Getty Images/File

    A likely Russian-speaking cybercriminal gang on Monday leaked what appear to be sensitive law enforcement files it stole from the Justice Department’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

    The dumped files appear to include information on targets of past ATF investigations and analyses of their phone communications, according to a review of the data by CNN and an independent cybersecurity researcher. Some of the files correspond to specific ATF agents and high-profile cases they apparently worked on.

    The data cover investigations related to armed robbery, arson, explosives and homicide, according to the researcher, Ron Fabela. A chunk of the cases mentioned in the files fall under the work the ATF’s Houston Field Division, Fabela said.

    In a statement on Monday, ATF said it “cannot confirm the authenticity, nature, or scope” of the leaked data at this time and that the agency was working with the Department of Justice and other federal agencies to “assess the claims and take appropriate actions.”

    “As ATF previously stated, the affected system was not connected to – and the incident did not affect – ATF’s other operational systems. ATF’s ability to carry out its mission has not been impacted,” the agency’s statement continued.

    ATF originally disclosed the hack last week, saying it met the threshold for a “major” cybersecurity incident that requires notifying Congress. Under federal law, a “major” cyber incident is generally one that could harm US national security, foreign policy or economic interests.

    A prolific ransomware group called Qilin previously claimed responsibility for the breach; on Monday, the group began leaking the files from its dark -web victim site. The group has claimed victims in the manufacturing, retail and healthcare sectors in recent years, leading Cisco’s cyber-intelligence unit to brand it one of the “most prolific and damaging ransomware threats on a global scale.”

    Halcyon, another cybersecurity firm that tracks ransomware groups, has said it has “high-confidence” that Qilin are Russian speakers.

    The ATF hack is the latest headache for federal agencies involving the cybercriminals they often pursue. A 2023 ransomware attack on the US Marshals Service affected personal information of the subjects of the service’s investigations. That same year, hackers breached a computer system the FBI’s New York field office used in investigations of images of child sexual exploitation, including a system used to store images related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, according to people briefed on the matter.

    Digital security Federal agencies Russia

  • 共和党斥巨资攻击民主党数据中心,特朗普为何却喊出“让数据说了算”?


    2026年8月31日 美国东部时间下午1:21 / CNN政治频道

    作者:达纳·巴什,CNN

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/31/politics/video/cnn-reporting-data-center-ad-spending-ip

    共和党斥巨资攻击民主党数据中心。特朗普为何却喊出“让数据说了算”?

    《政坛内参》节目

    在《政坛内参》节目中,达纳·巴什剖析了CNN最新报道:今年全美与数据中心相关的政治广告支出高达3100万美元,其中几乎全为负面广告。节目嘉宾小组深入探讨了两党对数据中心日益高涨的反对声浪、候选人如何调整竞选说辞,以及这一议题对中期选举的潜在影响。

    Republicans are spending big attacking Democrats on data centers. So why is Trump saying ‘let data reign’?

    2026-08-31 1:21 PM EDT / CNN Politics

    By Dana Bash, CNN

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/31/politics/video/cnn-reporting-data-center-ad-spending-ip

    Republicans are spending big attacking Democrats on data centers. So why is Trump saying ‘let data reign’?

    Inside Politics

    On “Inside Politics,” Dana Bash breaks down new CNN reporting on $31 million in political ad spending tied to data centers this year, almost all negative. The panel unpacks growing bipartisan backlash to data centers, how candidates are recalibrating their messages and the potential impact on the midterms.

  • “落后又贫穷”:特朗普向抵制关键技术的社区发出严厉警告


    2026年8月31日 美国东部时间下午2:21 / 福克斯新闻

    总统称反对数据中心正中中国下怀
    作者:阿曼达·马西亚斯

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/6a80bac3-c74a-4701-a9f9-92ba3d9070fa

    收听本文
    3分钟

    唐纳德·特朗普总统周一针对针对数据中心的日益强烈的反对声浪发出警告,那些拒绝建设此类设施的社区可能会错失美国人工智能繁荣带来的就业和经济收益。

    “全美各地的社区之所以不想要数据中心,唯一的原因就是他们最终想变得落后又贫穷,”特朗普在Truth Social的一篇帖子中写道。“如果他们想要成功致富,实现更低的税率和遍地的工作机会,那就让数据产业蓬勃发展吧,”他补充道。

    特朗普将能源主导地位和美国在人工智能领域的领导地位作为其第二任期的核心支柱,将数据中心作为他推动美国保持对中国领先优势的核心举措。

    “中国对这场反数据中心运动再满意不过了,”特朗普写道,他认为对新建数据中心的抵制可能会削弱美国在全球人工智能竞赛中的优势。

    选举举报人警告外国势力斥巨资让美国人反对人工智能

    唐纳德·特朗普总统已将能源主导地位和人工智能作为其第二任期的核心优先事项。(彭博社/盖蒂图片社)

    数据中心热潮也已成为中期选举的一个热点问题,人们对电价上涨、水资源消耗和快速开发的担忧,与数据中心能带来的就业、投资和美国人工智能领域的主导地位承诺产生了冲突。

    这种紧张局势已在全美各地上演。

    特朗普特别批评了得克萨斯州州长格雷格·阿博特的做法,称这个孤星州对待数据中心的态度是一个“错误”,并指出数据中心项目能为愿意接纳它们的社区带来经济投资。

    德克萨斯州已巩固了其在该行业的巨头地位,在高纬环球2026年全球数据中心市场排名中,达拉斯位列全球第一大主要数据中心市场。但数十亿美元的新投资也带来了巨大的电力需求,以及谁应为支持这一热潮所需的基础设施买单的争议。

    阿博特已着手解决这些担忧,他指示监管机构确保数据中心承担为其服务所需的基础设施成本,并呼吁开发商自行增加发电能力,而非将成本转嫁给德克萨斯州居民。

    美国南部某州在全球增长最快的行业之一中登顶

    包括州长格雷格·阿博特在内的德克萨斯州领导人一直致力于将该州打造成大型数据中心开发的目的地,尽管官员们仍在应对新项目可能给电网带来的压力。(安塔内·塔维提安/路透社)

    与此同时,在宾夕法尼亚州,州长乔希·夏皮罗最近对大型数据中心开发实施了新的限制要求。

    其他州州长则采取了更为严格的立场。纽约州民主党州长安德鲁·科莫(注:原文此处应为Kathy Hochul,即凯西·霍楚尔)对新建超大规模数据中心实施了为期一年的禁令,各州都在应对电价上涨、电网可靠性和开发速度方面的担忧。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    数据中心开发在孤星州如火如荼,北德克萨斯州在该行业领先市场的新全球排名中位居榜首。(靖家洋/特约撰稿人/法新社/盖蒂图片社)

    数据中心容纳了为人工智能和云服务提供动力的服务器和计算设备,需要大量电力来运行和冷却。大多数美国人可能从未进过数据中心,但他们一直在不知不觉中依赖数据中心。

    各州日益多样化的限制和要求可能会使特朗普推动数据中心快速扩张的计划复杂化,因为社区需要在美国的人工智能雄心与对电力成本、水资源使用和开发的担忧之间做出权衡。

    阿曼达·马西亚斯报道商业、经济与政治的交集,重点关注政策决策如何塑造市场、企业和美国工人。

    ‘Backwards and poor’: Trump issues dire warning to communities blocking critical technology

    August 31, 2026 2:21pm EDT / Fox News

    The president said opposition to data centers plays into China’s hands

    By Amanda Macias

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/6a80bac3-c74a-4701-a9f9-92ba3d9070fa

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    President Donald Trump took aim Monday at the growing backlash against data centers, warning that communities that shut the door on the facilities risk missing out on the jobs and economic gains of America’s AI boom.

    “The only reason that communities throughout the U.S.A. should not want Data Centers is if they want to end up being backwards and poor,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. “If they want to be successful and rich, with far lower taxes and jobs all over the place, let Data Reign,” he added.

    Trump has made energy dominance and U.S. leadership in artificial intelligence central pillars of his second term, placing data centers at the center of his push to maintain America’s edge over China.

    “China could not be happier with this anti Data Center movement,” Trump wrote, arguing that resistance to new facilities risks undercutting America’s edge in the global AI race.

    ELECTION WHISTLEBLOWER WARNS FOREIGN ACTORS ARE SPENDING BILLIONS TO TURN AMERICANS AGAINST AI

    President Donald Trump has made energy dominance and artificial intelligence key priorities for his second term.(Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    The data center boom has also emerged as a midterm flashpoint, as concerns over rising electricity costs, water use and rapid development collide with promises of jobs, investment and U.S. dominance in artificial intelligence.

    That tension is already playing out across the country.

    Trump has specifically criticized Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s approach, calling the Lone Star State’s stance toward data centers a “mistake” and pointing to the economic investment the projects can bring to communities willing to host them.

    Texas has cemented its status as a heavyweight in the industry, with Dallas ranking as the world’s No. 1 primary data center market in Cushman & Wakefield’s 2026 Global Data Center Market Comparison. But billions of dollars in new investment have also brought enormous electricity demands and questions over who should pay for the infrastructure needed to support the boom.

    Abbott has moved to address those concerns, directing regulators to ensure data centers cover the infrastructure costs needed to serve them and calling on developers to add their own power generation rather than shift costs onto Texas residents.

    A SOUTHERN STATE JUST TOOK THE TOP SPOT IN ONE OF THE WORLD’S FASTEST-GROWING INDUSTRIES

    Texas leaders, including Gov. Greg Abbott, have sought to position the state as a destination for large-scale data center development even as officials grapple with the strain new projects could place on the electric grid.(Antranik Tavitian/Reuters)

    Meanwhile, in Pennsylvania, Gov. Josh Shapiro recently imposed new requirements on large data center developments.

    Other governors have taken a more restrictive stance. Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul imposed a one-year moratorium on new hyper-scale data centers as states grapple with concerns over electricity costs, grid reliability and the pace of development.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Data center development is surging across the Lone Star State, with North Texas taking the top spot in a new global ranking of the industry’s leading markets.(Yasuyoshi Chiba/Contributor/AFP/Getty Images)

    Data centers house the servers and computing equipment that power artificial intelligence and cloud services, requiring vast amounts of electricity to operate and cool. Most Americans may never see the inside of one, but they rely on data centers constantly, often without realizing it.

    The growing patchwork of state restrictions and requirements could complicate Trump’s push for rapid data center expansion as communities weigh America’s AI ambitions against concerns over electricity costs, water use and development.

    Amanda Macias covers the intersection of business, economics and politics, with a focus on how policy decisions shape markets, businesses and American workers.

  • 共和党委员会请求美国最高法院保留低价广告费率使用权


    2026年8月31日 下午4:38 UTC / 路透社

    作者:约翰·克鲁泽尔
    2026年8月31日 下午4:38 UTC 更新于3小时前

    image

    • 摘要
    • 下级法院裁定委员会无权享受低价广告费率
    • 最高法院6月驳回联合支出上限规定
    • 共和党主要委员会的资金储备远超民主党

    华盛顿8月31日路透电 — 在唐纳德·特朗普所在政党力争在11月中期选举中掌控国会之际,两个共和党委员会已向美国最高法院请求保留一项联邦政策,该政策可让它们获得长期以来政治候选人享有的广播电视广告折扣费率。

    美国全国共和党参议员竞选委员会和美国全国共和党国会竞选委员会在周一公开的一份文件中请求大法官们叫停下级法院的裁决,该裁决实际上阻止了它们享受联邦通信委员会(FCC)所谓的“最低单位收费”规则带来的优惠。

    即刻开启您的晨间资讯:每日法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱,订阅《每日案卷》通讯。点击此处注册。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    该政策要求广播公司在大选前60天内播出特定政治广告时收取折扣费率,今年的这一窗口将于本周五开启。联邦通信委员会于3月发布指南称,政党委员会在购买与候选人联合投放的广告时,有资格享受低价费率。

    最高法院6月裁决支持共和党挑战者,废除了政党与候选人之间的联合支出联邦限制,此后该FCC政策的重要性显著提升。一名共和党官员向路透社表示,该裁决与委员会获得低价广告时段的资格相结合,意味着“我们的资金能比以往发挥更大作用”。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    共和党希望在11月3日的中期选举中保住对众议院和参议院的控制权。

    根据联邦选举委员会8月提交的文件,三大共和党委员会——共和党全国委员会、全国共和党国会竞选委员会和全国共和党参议员竞选委员会——截至7月底的现金储备约为2.79亿美元,是民主党同行约1.36亿美元资金的两倍多,民主党委员会还背负着近1800万美元的债务。

    包括佐治亚州参议员乔恩·奥索夫在内的一群民主党候选人于6月提起诉讼,试图阻止最低单位收费政策适用于政党委员会。

    位于里士满的美国第四巡回上诉法院于8月25日支持民主党挑战者,裁定政党无权享受低价广告费率。该裁决促使共和党委员会向最高法院提出请求,要求在FCC广告费率政策于本周生效前叫停第四巡回上诉法院的裁决。

    在法庭文件中,共和党委员会表示,它们已经“根据这些规则编制了数千万美元的广告采购预算”。它们补充道:“但由于第四巡回上诉法院的裁决,广播电台已经取消了这些费率。”

    最高法院6月以6票赞成、3票反对的裁决,凭借其保守派多数席位,认定限制政党在候选人参与下用于竞选活动的支出金额违反了美国宪法第一修正案对政府剥夺言论自由的保护。

    这是近几十年来取消竞选资金限制的最新一项裁决,也是最高法院在近期结束的任期内作出的多项有利于共和党人的裁决之一。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    约翰·克鲁泽尔 报道;威尔·邓汉姆 编辑

    我们的标准:路透社信任原则,打开新标签页

    Republican committees ask US Supreme Court to preserve access to cheaper ad rates

    2026-08-31 4:38 PM UTC / Reuters

    By John Kruzel

    August 31, 2026 4:38 PM UTC Updated 3 hours ago

    People walk in front of the Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 30, 2026. REUTERS/Cheney Orr Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    • Summary
    • Lower court said committees not entitled to lower ad rates
    • Supreme Court in June rejected coordinated-spending caps
    • Major Republican committees’ war chest dwarfs Democrats

    WASHINGTON, Aug 31 (Reuters) – Two Republican committees have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to preserve a federal policy ​that would give them access to discounted television and radio advertising rates long available to political ‌candidates, as President Donald Trump’s party seeks to keep control of Congress in the November midterm elections.

    The National Republican Senatorial Committee and National Republican Congressional Committee asked the justices in a filing made public on Monday to halt a lower court’s ruling that effectively blocked them from benefiting ​from the Federal Communications Commission’s so-called “lowest unit charge” rule.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    That policy requires broadcasters to charge discounted rates for ​airing certain political advertisements within 60 days of a general election, a window that opens this ⁠year on Friday. The FCC in March published guidance saying that party committees are eligible for the cheaper rates ​when buying ads coordinated with candidates.

    The FCC policy gained greater significance after the Supreme Court in June struck down federal restrictions ​on spending coordinated between parties and their candidates, siding with Republican challengers. One Republican official told Reuters that the combination of that ruling and the committees’ eligibility for cheaper airtime means, “Our dollars can go further than they could before.”

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Republicans are hoping to retain control of ​the House of Representatives and Senate in the November 3 midterms.

    The three major Republican committees — the Republican National Committee, the ​National Republican Congressional Committee and the National Republican Senatorial Committee — ended July with about $279 million in cash. That was more than double ‌the ⁠roughly $136 million held by their Democratic counterparts, which also carried nearly $18 million in debt, according to Federal Election Commission filings in August.

    A group of Democratic candidates including Senator Jon Ossoff of Georgia sued in June to try to block the lowest unit charge policy from applying to party committees.

    The Richmond-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on August 25 sided ​with the Democratic challengers, ruling ​that political parties are not ⁠entitled to the low-cost ad rate. That ruling prompted the Republican committees to ask the Supreme Court to halt the 4th Circuit’s ruling before the FCC ad-rate policy takes effect ​this week.

    In court papers, the Republican committees said they have already budgeted “tens of millions ​of dollars in ⁠ad buys under these rules.” They added, “But because of the 4th Circuit’s decision, broadcast stations are already rescinding those rates.”

    The Supreme Court in a 6-3 ruling in June powered by its conservative majority decided that a cap on the amount of ⁠money parties ​can spend on campaigns with input from candidates violates the U.S. Constitution’s ​First Amendment protections against government abridgment of freedom of speech.

    It was the latest decision eliminating campaign funding limits in recent decades and marked one of ​several rulings the court issued during its recently concluded term that favored Republicans.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

  • 乔治·桑托斯成为首位被卡尔希终身禁赛者


    2026-08-31T16:53:53.715Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/31/politics/george-santos-kalshi-ban

    预测市场平台卡尔希(Kalshi)周一对一场竞争激烈的众议院选区共和党候选人处以罚款,并对前众议员乔治·桑托斯实施了该平台有史以来首次终身禁赛,此前双方已就内幕交易展开调查。

    北卡罗来纳州候选人劳里·巴克哈特在给美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)的一份声明中承认,她曾押注自己的竞选,并表示自己犯了一个“愚蠢的错误”。

    这是迄今为止最受关注的政治内幕交易案例,即候选人或工作人员利用自身掌握的内幕信息或能够影响选举结果的优势进行市场交易。专家警告称,随着今年预测平台的普及,这种行为正日益成为一种风险。

    “我押注了自己,真的,”巴克哈特说道,“这是个愚蠢的错误,我一发现问题就努力弥补了。可以说,我在卡尔希的交易生涯很短暂。”

    卡尔希在周一的一份法律文件中指出,巴克哈特的交易金额不足1000美元,且配合了平台的内部调查,因此将被禁赛三年。

    而针对桑托斯的终身禁赛,则源于他今年早些时候就自己能否出席国情咨文演讲所下的内幕赌注。桑托斯曾在2023年臭名昭著地被国会驱逐,后因一起无关的欺诈案入狱,但去年凭借特朗普的减刑提前获释。

    如今,像卡尔希和Polymarket这类允许用户对体育、选举、娱乐等事件下注的预测市场,每周的交易量已达数十亿美元。相关企业和联邦监管机构已承诺将打击内幕交易和市场操纵行为。

    今年早些时候,卡尔希曾因类似行为暂停了两党共三名小型政治候选人的账户。

    CNN与卡尔希存在合作关系,并使用其数据报道重大事件。CNN的编辑人员不得在预测市场进行交易。

    巴克哈特一案是首个公开披露的国会竞选候选人押注自身竞选的案例,且该案发生在一个关键选区。

    唐纳德·特朗普总统已背书退役陆军上校巴克哈特,她也是全国共和党国会委员会“让美国再次强大多数派”计划首批提名的候选人之一,该计划旨在助力共和党人拿下民主党掌控的席位。

    北卡罗来纳州第一国会选区是中期选举中竞争最激烈的众议院选区之一。该区域涵盖北卡罗来纳州东部大部分乡村地区,自2023年起由民主党众议员唐·戴维斯担任代表。

    共和党州议员去年对该选区进行了重新划分,这是特朗普在中期选举前在全国范围内推动有利于共和党的选区重划计划的一部分。根据库克政治报告的分类,该选区目前被评为“倾向共和党”,是共和党有望拿下民主党席位的最佳机会之一。

    巴克哈特曾在2024年与戴维斯竞选该席位,在选区重划前以不到2个百分点的差距落败。她在启动本次竞选前,去年曾在国防部短暂任职。

    民主党人抓住卡尔希公布的这一结果攻击巴克哈特。

    戴维斯在社交媒体帖子中称,巴克哈特的行为是“丧失公众信任的不可饶恕的失信行为”,并指责她将竞选活动当作“牟利的机会”。

    民主党国会竞选委员会发言人麦迪逊·安德鲁斯在一份声明中表示,“绝不可能信任她能为北卡罗来纳州民众担任一名有道德操守的议员”。

    卡尔希平台的一位发言人证实,针对桑托斯的终身禁赛是该平台首例。

    “嘿@卡尔希,感谢你们把我终身禁赛出你们的赌博平台。咱们看看你们还能撑多久,”桑托斯周一在X平台上发文称,这番话针对的是当下的一场法律纠纷,即卡尔希这类预测公司应被各州归类为赌博平台,还是继续由联邦政府按金融市场进行监管。

    监管预测市场的联邦监管机构也对桑托斯的行为展开了调查。美国商品期货交易委员会今年7月宣布达成和解,对桑托斯处以17500美元罚款,并结案。

    卡尔希执法主管鲍比·德诺尔周一表示,该公司正对巴克哈特、桑托斯以及其他几名违反平台规则的交易员采取行动。

    “除乔治·桑托斯外,所有人员都配合了我们合规部门的调查,他们将被暂时禁赛,”德诺尔说道。

    CNN已联系桑托斯置评。

    他此前否认存在不当行为,并称相关指控“荒谬可笑”。在有关其可疑交易的公开报道传出后,他曾在社交媒体上抨击卡尔希,称其为“掠夺性应用程序”。

    本文已更新最新信息。

    George Santos becomes first person to get lifetime ban from Kalshi

    2026-08-31T16:53:53.715Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/31/politics/george-santos-kalshi-ban

    The prediction market Kalshi on Monday fined the Republican nominee in a competitive House race and imposed its first-ever lifetime ban, against former Rep. George Santos, after insider trading investigations.

    The North Carolina candidate, Laurie Buckhout, admitted in a statement to CNN that she bet on her own campaign and said she made a “dumb mistake.”

    This is the highest-profile example to date of political insider trading, where candidates or staffers trade on markets where they possess inside information or can influence the outcome. Experts have warned the practice is a growing danger as prediction platforms have exploded in popularity this year.

    “I bet on myself. Literally,” Buckhout said. “It was a dumb mistake, and as soon as I learned there was an issue, I worked to make it right. Safe to say my career as a Kalshi trader was short-lived.”

    Kalshi noted in a legal filing on Monday that she traded less than $1,000, cooperated with their internal investigation, and will get a three-year suspension.

    The lifetime ban against Santos, meanwhile, stems from insider bets he placed about his potential appearance at the State of the Union earlier this year. Santos infamously was expelled from Congress in 2023 and went to prison in an unrelated fraud case but was released early thanks to a Trump commutation last year.

    Prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket – where people can wager on sports, elections, entertainment and more – now see billions of dollars in weekly trading volume. The companies and federal regulators have pledged to crack down on insider trading and market manipulation.

    Earlier this year, Kalshi suspended three minor political candidates, hailing from both parties, for similar conduct.

    CNN has a partnership with Kalshi and uses its data to cover major events. CNN’s editorial employees aren’t permitted to trade on prediction markets.

    The Buckhout case is the first publicly known instance of a nominee running for Congress caught betting on their own campaign. And it came in a critical district.

    President Donald Trump has endorsed Buckhout, a retired Army colonel, and she was one of the first candidates named to the National Republican Congressional Committee’s “MAGA Majority” program for the midterms. The program promotes the party’s most promising recruits to flip Democratic-held seats.

    North Carolina’s 1st Congressional District is one of the most competitive House districts in the midterms. It covers a mostly rural region of eastern North Carolina and has been represented by Democratic Rep. Don Davis since 2023.

    Republican state lawmakers redrew the district last year as part of Trump’s nationwide push for GOP-friendly redistricting ahead of the midterms. It is now classified as “Lean Republican” by the Cook Political Report, making it one of Republicans’ best shots at netting a seat.

    Buckhout ran against Davis in 2024 and lost by fewer than 2 percentage points before the district was redrawn. She briefly worked for the Department of Defense last year before launching her latest campaign.

    Democrats seized on the Kalshi announcement to attack Buckhout.

    In a social media post, Davis said Buckhout’s actions were “a disqualifying breach of public trust” and chided her for using the campaign as “an opportunity to cash in.”

    Madison Andrus, a spokeswoman for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said in a statement “there is no chance she can be trusted as an ethical representative for North Carolina families.”

    The Santos case is the first lifetime ban on the Kalshi platform, a spokesperson confirmed.

    “Hey @Kalshi thanks for the lifetime ban from your gambling platform. Let’s see how much longer you guys are around for,” Santos posted Monday on X, referring to the ongoing legal battle over whether prediction companies like Kalshi should be regulated by the states as gambling or continue to be regulated by the federal government as financial markets.

    Federal regulators that oversee prediction markets also investigated Santos for his conduct. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced a settlement in July, imposing a $17,500 fine against Santos and closing the government’s probe.

    Kalshi’s head of enforcement, Bobby DeNault, said Monday that the company was taking action against Buckhout, Santos, and a few other traders who broke the site’s rules.

    “All but one individual (George Santos) cooperated with our Compliance Department inquiries and will be banned temporarily,” DeNault said.

    CNN has reached out to Santos for comment.

    He previously denied wrongdoing and called the allegations “preposterous.” After public reports about his questionable trades, he attacked Kalshi on social media, calling it “a predatory app.”

    This story has been updated with new information.

  • 美国联邦贸易委员会与22个州起诉亚马逊,指控其存在秘密广告加价计划


    2026年8月31日 / 美国东部时间下午4:00 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    美国联邦贸易委员会与22个州于周一起诉亚马逊,指控这家电商巨头在其在线搜索广告拍卖中暗中抬高价格,可能让消费者损失数百亿美元。

    这起诉讼指控,未披露的加价行为已持续七年,导致超过100万个亚马逊品牌和卖家在该平台投放广告时需支付的费用上涨。

    参与此次诉讼的还有阿拉斯加、亚利桑那、加利福尼亚、科罗拉多、佛罗里达、爱达荷、伊利诺伊、印第安纳、艾奥瓦、肯塔基、路易斯安那、马里兰、内布拉斯加、新泽西、纽约、北卡罗来纳、俄克拉荷马、宾夕法尼亚、罗德岛、南卡罗来纳、佛蒙特和华盛顿州的总检察长。

    此次诉讼的核心是所谓的第二价格拍卖——这是数字广告交易的行业标准。亚马逊曾告知广告商,他们只需比第二名出价高出“1美分”即可获得某个广告关键词的投放权,但诉讼指控称,亚马逊在约80%的情况下实际向中标者收取了他们自身的出价。

    美国联邦贸易委员会及联合起诉的各州称,这抬高了企业的广告成本。

    “全球最大的在线零售商之一从事不公平和欺骗性行为,其影响可能极为惊人,”美国联邦贸易委员会主席安德鲁·N·弗格森在一份声明中表示。“亚马逊有数百万广告客户被误导,支付了远高于正常水平的价格。这些额外成本很大程度上转嫁给了美国消费者。”

    亚马逊称此次诉讼“毫无根据”,并表示2019年至2025年间,其赞助商品广告的平均中标出价下降了50%。

    “美国联邦贸易委员会的指控从根本上误解了广告商的运营方式,”该公司在一份声明中说道。“广告商是根据实际表现调整出价,而非依据拍卖机制的描述。”

    亚马逊补充道:“即便接受美国联邦贸易委员会存在缺陷的前提,即广告商不会调整出价,我们估计,由于亚马逊优先考虑广告相关性而非仅根据出价选择广告,广告商在2021年至2025年间已节省了超过80亿美元。”

    内部文件

    根据美国联邦贸易委员会诉状中援引的一位亚马逊高管的说法,亚马逊内部文件显示,该零售商清楚广告商是基于他们参与真正第二价格拍卖的信念进行出价的,但员工们据称曾讨论过抬高价格,同时“希望广告商不会注意到并减少出价或广告支出”。

    北卡罗来纳州总检察长杰夫·杰克逊称,亚马逊曾测试在不被广告商察觉的情况下,最多可以增加多少隐藏收费。

    诉讼指控称:“亚马逊煞费苦心地主动向消费者隐瞒其抬高所谓拍卖价格的事实。随着亚马逊越来越确信其广告客户未察觉其行为,它大幅提高了隐藏加价幅度。”

    纽约州总检察长莱蒂西亚·詹姆斯在一份声明中表示,美国联邦贸易委员会和各州正寻求法院禁令,禁止亚马逊实施这一“非法计划”,并要求该公司支付罚款、赔偿金及其他损害赔偿。

    编辑:阿兰·谢特

    FTC and 22 states sue Amazon over alleged secret ad surcharge scheme

    August 31, 2026 / 4:00 PM EDT / CBS News

    The Federal Trade Commission and 22 states on Monday sued Amazon over allegations that the e-commerce giant secretly inflated prices in its online search advertising auctions, potentially costing customers tens of billions of dollars.

    The lawsuit alleges that the undisclosed surcharges were applied for seven years, increasing the prices that more than 1 million Amazon brands and sellers were required to pay to advertise on its platform.

    The FTC’s lawsuit was joined by the attorneys general of Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Vermont and Washington.

    The lawsuit centers on so-called second-price auctions, the industry standard for digital ad deals. Amazon informed businesses that they would pay only “one cent more” than the second-place bidder for an advertising keyword, but the lawsuit alleges that the retailer charged the winners their own price about 80% of the time.

    That raised costs for businesses, alleged the FTC and states joining the suit.

    “When one of the world’s largest online retailers engages in unfair and deceptive conduct, the impact can be staggering,” FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson said in a statement. “Amazon has millions of advertising customers who were misled into paying significantly higher prices. These higher costs were largely passed on to American consumers.”

    Amazon called the lawsuit “misguided,” and said that the average winning bids for sponsored product ads dropped 50% from 2019 to 2025.

    “The FTC’s claim fundamentally misunderstands how advertisers operate,” the company said in a statement. “Advertisers adjust bids based on real-world performance, not descriptions of auction mechanics.”

    Amazon added, “Even accepting the FTC’s flawed premise that advertisers do not adjust bids, we estimate they saved over $8 billion from 2021 to 2025 as a result of Amazon prioritizing ad relevancy over selecting ads on bid price alone.”

    Internal documents

    Internal Amazon documents suggest the retailer was aware that advertisers were bidding based on their belief they were taking part in a true second-price auction, but that employees allegedly discussed raising prices while “hoping that advertisers don’t notice and decrease bids or ad spend,” according to an Amazon executive cited in the FTC’s complaint.

    Amazon allegedly tested how much it could increase hidden charges without being detected by advertisers, according to North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson.

    “Amazon takes great pains to actively conceal from customers the fact that it inflates its purported auction prices,” the lawsuit alleged. “As Amazon’s confidence that its advertising customers are unaware of its conduct has grown, it has substantially increased its hidden surcharges.”

    New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement that the FTC and states are seeking a court order to bar Amazon from pursuing the “illegal scheme” and to require the company to pay penalties, restitution and other damages.

    Edited by Alain Sherter

  • 美加贸易战中的经济专家:“局势正变得越来越糟”


    美国东部时间2026年8月31日星期一下午2:10 / 克里斯顿·刘易斯 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)报道

    美加贸易战中的经济专家:“局势正变得越来越糟”

    加拿大总理马克·卡尼誓言将采取“等额关税”作为反击,以应对美国对价值200亿美元的加拿大商品加征50%关税的举措,此前双方未能达成贸易协议。卡尼的针锋相对措施定于9月8日生效,涉及钢铁、乳制品、家电、农业设备、纸浆、纸张和电子产品。

    经济专家接受了CNN的采访,探讨了这些关税对两国边境地区可能造成的影响。

    15:07 • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/31/politics/video/econ-experts-on-canada-tariffs-83126-ytc

    Economy experts on US-Canada trade war: ‘This is getting worse’

    2:10 PM EDT, Mon August 31, 2026 / By Kriston Lewis, CNN

    Economy experts on US-Canada trade war: ‘This is getting worse’

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney vowed “dollar-for-dollar” tariffs in response to the United States’ 50 percent tariffs on $20 billion in Canadian goods after the two sides failed to reach a trade deal. Carney’s tit-for-tat measures, set to take effect on September 8, will include tariffs on steel, dairy, appliances, agricultural equipment, pulp, paper and electronics.

    Economic experts spoke to CNN about the potential effects of these tariffs on both sides of the border.

    15:07 • Source: CNN

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/31/politics/video/econ-experts-on-canada-tariffs-83126-ytc

  • 特朗普的委内瑞拉石油协议会降低美国油价吗?专家解读来了


    2026年8月31日 美国东部时间下午1:57 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    特朗普总统周五表示,美国与委内瑞拉达成的开采其石油储备的协议“将在未来很长一段时间内大幅降低所有美国人的汽油价格”。目前美国全国平均汽油价格仍高于每加仑4美元,美国消费者可能会想知道援助是否即将到来。

    能源专家表示,别抱太大希望。

    委内瑞拉国家媒体周六报道,美国与委内瑞拉达成的协议涉及开发委内瑞拉17个战略油田,这些油田已探明的石油储量达650亿桶。尽管开采这些原油最终可能会导致更多石油流向美国,但跟踪能源基础设施的非营利组织全球能源监测组织(Global Energy Monitor)表示,新油田从发现到开始产油可能需要15年时间。

    该组织补充说,考虑到地缘政治风险和委内瑞拉石油的特性,这个时间线甚至可能是乐观的。该国所谓的重质原油比美国炼油厂通常加工的轻质原油更难提炼成汽油。

    即便是最为乐观的预测也以年为单位计算。大宗商品分析公司Hilltower Resource Advisors的首席执行官特雷西·舒查特(Tracy Shuchart)在社交媒体帖子中表示,可能需要5到15年的时间,才有足够多的委内瑞拉石油流向美国,从而对国内汽油价格产生影响。

    汽油价格分析机构GasBuddy的石油分析师帕特里克·德哈恩(Patrick De Haan)在周一的研究报告中表示,这一声明“表明白宫仍然对高企的燃油价格感到担忧——但实际上,委内瑞拉石油产量增加带来的任何好处都需要数年时间才能完全显现,短期内不太可能产生显著影响”。

    投资银行瑞银(UBS)的分析师在8月31日的报告中表示,与此同时,美委石油合作项目面临潜在的法律和运营障碍,不太可能在短期内提振石油产量。

    增产需要时间

    根据美国能源信息署的数据,委内瑞拉拥有全球最大的已探明石油储量,略高于3000亿桶。相比之下,美国的已探明石油储量不足500亿桶。

    专家估计,委内瑞拉石油行业多年来投资不足,至少需要1000亿美元才能将其油田恢复至满负荷产能。根据石油输出国组织(OPEC)的最新数据,该国今年第二季度的石油产量已增至约每日110万桶,高于2025年的每日94.1万桶。

    瑞银分析师表示:“委内瑞拉石油行业今年迄今为止的表现凸显了扩大生产绝非易事。在前委内瑞拉总统尼古拉斯·马杜罗下台约8个月后,委内瑞拉的石油产量仅从极低的基数上升了10万至20万桶/日。”

    美国与委内瑞拉的协议以私人合资企业的形式达成,委内瑞拉总统德尔西·罗德里格斯表示,该国授予了一项在这17个油田运营的百年特许权。一位美国官员告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,美国政府将控制合资企业55%的股份,其中包括股权和以成本价从中获取石油的权利。

    美国国务卿马可·卢比奥周五在社交媒体上表示,该项目预计将为委内瑞拉吸引近1000亿美元的私人投资,并创造数千个就业岗位。

    前乔治·W·布什政府白宫能源顾问鲍勃·麦克纳利(Bob McNally)告诉美联社,该协议似乎为私营部门投资委内瑞拉石油行业铺平了道路。

    即便美国在今年1月干预委内瑞拉局势后,雪佛龙仍是唯一一家在委内瑞拉积极开采石油的美国石油公司。其他大型石油公司多年前在委内瑞拉前领导人乌戈·查韦斯将该国石油工业国有化后,就已撤出该国。

    埃克森美孚和康菲石油后来成功提起诉讼,要求为被没收的资产获得赔偿。

    瑞银分析师表示,这段历史可能会让石油公司对重新进入委内瑞拉持犹豫态度,即便在当前的协议框架下也是如此。

    “从美国石油公司的角度来看,任何在委内瑞拉的重大投资通常都需要配套一个能够经受住美国和委内瑞拉两国领导层更迭的法律框架,”他们写道。“埃克森美孚和康菲石油等公司仍根据与委内瑞拉此前被没收资产相关的法律判决,获得巨额赔偿。”

    他们补充道:“最终,在委内瑞拉的投资必须在经风险调整后的基础上,比全球其他替代方案更具吸引力。”

    白宫与石油公司举行会议

    白宫发言人泰勒·罗杰斯(Taylor Rogers)告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,特朗普总统定于周二与美国能源炼油商和分销商举行会议,讨论委内瑞拉协议。

    “特朗普总统专注于确保他成功的能源主导议程能够转化为消费者在加油站能获得的最大成本节约,”她说。“作为这一承诺的一部分,总统将与行业领袖会面,共同探讨提高炼油产能、进一步释放整个供应链的美国能源主导地位以及为美国民众降低油价的最佳途径。”

    目前,伊朗局势对汽油价格的影响比与委内瑞拉的协议更大。周日,在美国袭击霍尔木兹海峡的伊朗火箭发射器后,油价上涨。周一,美国基准原油西德克萨斯中质原油的价格上涨2.42美元,或2.9%,至每桶85.78美元。

    纽约大学能源、气候正义与可持续发展实验室主任艾米·迈尔斯·贾菲(Amy Myers Jaffe)告诉美联社,美委石油协议“从长远来看可能会有所帮助,但它不会对劳动节周末的零售汽油价格产生任何影响”。

    阿兰·谢特(Alain Sherter)编辑

    Will Trump’s Venezuela oil deal lower U.S. gas prices? Here’s what experts say.

    August 31, 2026 1:57 PM EDT / CBS News

    By President Trump on Friday said a U.S. deal with Venezuela to tap its oil reserves “will substantially lower Gas Prices for all Americans, long into the future.” With the average U.S. gas price still above $4 a gallon nationwide, American consumers may be wondering if help is on the way.

    Don’t hold your breath, energy experts said.

    The agreement with the U.S. involves the development of 17 strategic oil fields in Venezuela that hold proven reserves of 65 billion barrels of oil, Venezuelan state media reported on Saturday. Although tapping the crude could eventually lead to more oil flowing to the U.S., new fields can take 15 years after discovery to begin producing oil, according to Global Energy Monitor, a nonprofit that tracks energy infrastructure.

    That timeline may even be on the optimistic side, the group added, citing geopolitical risk and the nature of Venezuela’s oil. The country’s so-called heavy crude is harder to refine into gas than the light crude U.S. refiners typically process.

    Even more bullish forecasts are measured in years. Tracy Shuchart, CEO of commodity analytics firm Hilltower Resource Advisors, said in a social media post that it could take five to 15 years before enough Venezuelan oil flows to the U.S. to affect domestic gas prices.

    The announcement is “a signal that the White House remains concerned about elevated fuel prices — though in reality, any benefits from increased Venezuelan output will take years to fully materialize and are unlikely to move the needle in the near term,” GasBuddy petroleum analyst Patrick De Haan said in a Monday research note.

    Meanwhile, the U.S.-Venezuela oil venture faces potential legal and operational obstacles, making it unlikely to boost oil production in the near term, analysts with investment bank UBS said in an Aug. 31 report.

    Boosting production will take time

    Venezuela has the world’s largest proven oil reserves, at just over 300 billion barrels, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. By comparison, the U.S. has less than 50 billion barrels.

    Venezuela’s oil industry has suffered from years of underinvestment, with experts estimating that at least $100 billion is needed to restore its oil fields to full capacity. The country has boosted its oil production this year to about 1.1 million barrels a day in the second quarter, up from 941,000 barrels a day in 2025, according to the latest OPEC data.

    “The performance of Venezuela’s oil sector so far this year underscores that expanding production is no easy feat,” UBS said. “Roughly eight months after former Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro’s removal from office, Venezuelan petroleum output is up by just 100-200 thousand barrels per day from a very low base.”

    The U.S.-Venezuela deal is structured as a private joint venture, with Venezuelan President Delcy Rodríguez saying the country granted a 100-year concession to operate in the 17 oil fields. The U.S. government will control 55% of the joint venture, split between equity and the ability to obtain oil from it at cost, a U.S. official told CBS News.

    The project is expected to attract nearly $100 billion in private investment to Venezuela and support thousands of jobs, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on social media on Friday.

    The deal appears to pave the way for the private sector to invest in Venezuela’s industry, Bob McNally, a former energy adviser in George W. Bush’s White House, told The Associated Press.

    Even after the U.S. intervention in Venezuela in January, Chevron remains the only American oil company actively producing oil in Venezuela. Other major oil companies exited the country years ago after former Venezuelan leader Hugo Chávez nationalized the country’s oil industry.

    ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips later successfully sued for compensation for the confiscation of their assets.

    That history may make oil companies hesitant to re-enter Venezuela, even under the current agreement, the UBS analysts said.

    “From a U.S. oil company’s perspective, any significant investment in Venezuela would generally need to be accompanied by a legal framework that could survive a change in leadership in both the U.S. and Venezuela,” they wrote. “Companies such as ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips are still owed significant amounts under legal judgments related to assets previously expropriated in Venezuela.”

    They added, “Ultimately, investments in Venezuela would have to compare favorably on a risk-adjusted basis with alternatives around the world.”

    White House meeting with oil companies

    Mr. Trump is scheduled to meet with U.S. energy refiners and distributors on Tuesday to discuss the Venezuelan deal, White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers told CBS News.

    “President Trump is laser-focused on ensuring his successful energy dominance agenda translates into the most cost savings possible at the pump for consumers,” she said. “As part of that commitment, the President will meet with industry leaders to collaborate on the best ways to increase refining capacity, further unleash American energy dominance across the entire supply chain and bring down prices for the American people.”

    For now, the Iran war is having a greater impact on gas prices than the agreement with Venezuela. Oil prices rose Sunday after the U.S. attacked Iranian rocket launchers in the Strait of Hormuz. The price for a barrel of West Texas Intermediate, the U.S. benchmark, rose $2.42, or 2.9%, to $85.78 a barrel on Monday.

    The U.S.-Venezuela deal could be “helpful in the long run, but it’s not going to do anything to change the price of gasoline at the retail station for Labor Day weekend,” Amy Myers Jaffe, director of the Energy, Climate Justice and Sustainability Lab at New York University, told AP.

    Edited by Alain Sherter

  • 80岁参议员寻求连任六年——将自己塑造成革命者


    2026-08-31T16:00:29.379Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/31/politics/massachusetts-democratic-senate-primary-markey-moulton

    马萨诸塞州阿灵顿——

    波士顿倾茶事件的核心并非茶叶,当然也不是莫霍克人,尽管当时殖民者们正是身着这套服饰将一箱箱茶叶倒入海中。

    在周二深蓝州马萨诸塞州的民主党参议院初选中,资深参议员埃德·马基正回溯这些革命根源,将自己定位为反建制候选人,挑战众议员赛斯·莫尔顿——尽管他1973年抵达华盛顿的时间仅比乔·拜登晚三年。

    尽管这场竞选被左翼激进主义的言辞所笼罩,但在表面之下,对许多人来说,这场竞争与其说是围绕意识形态议题或施政理念,不如说是野心的碰撞、为未来掌控州内民主党权力的努力,以及个人恩怨。

    现年80岁的马基站在一方,誓言继续为左翼理想而战,这些理想既有他已取得的成就,也有他在多年从政生涯中尚未推动通过的政策。另一方则是47岁的荣誉海军陆战队老兵、已任职六届的国会议员莫尔顿,他曾多次挑战南希·佩洛西及其他多位民主党领袖,令他们颇为不满。莫尔顿将竞选的核心放在代际变革上。

    尽管这场初选被称为中期选举周期最后一场至关重要的民主党党内对决,但马基和莫尔顿的竞选活动中,选民们告诉CNN,他们很难理解这场竞选在党内大辩论中的定位,甚至弄不清“进步派”一词如今究竟意味着什么。

    “对我而言,我觉得就是要致力于帮助工人阶级,致力于提升代表性不足群体的地位。我没有一个单一的评判标准,说如果你不认同这点,就不算进步派,”东北大学法学院学生科林·鲁说道。周六,他和其他大学生作为背景,出席了在多切斯特的国际电气工人兄弟会工会大厅举行的马基竞选集会。这场集会的主讲嘉宾是佛蒙特州参议员伯尼·桑德斯和马萨诸塞州资深参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦。

    “我喜欢成为进步派,”语言学家莉萨·拉沃伊说道。周六下午,她来到了在马萨诸塞州林恩公共草坪举办的莫尔顿筹款派对。她表示,这个问题让她想起了自己作为第二语言英语教师时遇到的一些困境。“使用这些词汇的人可以自己定义其含义,就像星巴克用‘大杯’和‘超大杯’一样……在我看来,进步派就是要打破现有体系,让每个人都能拥有合理的发展机会。”

    沃伦在2012年以局外人进步派英雄的身份当选参议员,她在马基竞选集会的后台(她是当日主要演讲者之一)向CNN给出了自己当下的定义:“进步派是那些相信政府应该发挥作用,为所有人扩大机会,而不仅仅是帮助将更多资源输送给顶层人群的人。”

    马基向CNN给出的进步主义定义是一系列他一直在推动但尚未获得通过的主张:“全民医保、绿色新政、跨性别权利法案、对亿万富翁征税、削减国防预算,将资金转用于医疗、教育和环境正义。”

    莫尔顿的回答是:“在我看来,进步派意味着真正取得进展,我认为这是很大的区别。因为毫无疑问,马基参议员很擅长写新闻稿,擅长写出不会冒犯任何人的措辞完美的声明,但他并没有太多实际作为。”

    这场初选对马萨诸塞州的民主党领袖们而言颇具风险。马基并未激发广泛的热情,许多人曾认为他2020年的胜利——当时时任众议员乔·肯尼迪三世试图在初选中将他拉下马——将是他的告别演出,让他体面地结束职业生涯。当年,马基与纽约州众议员亚历山大·奥卡西奥-科特兹共同提出《绿色新政》,后者帮助提振了马基的竞选活动。

    在私下交谈中,州内官员表示,他们陷入了两难境地:一方面觉得这位参议员只是在走过场,另一方面又个人反感莫尔顿。

    马基获胜的可能性还需结合未来几年马萨诸塞州两个参议院席位和州长职位都可能出现空缺的背景来考量。沃伦在2031年现任任期结束时将年满81岁,州民主党人士猜测,州长莫拉·希利可能会寻求未来总统政府中的职位。

    渴望崭露头角的年轻马萨诸塞州民主党人并不太愿意搅乱这滩他们自己也可能想要涉足的浑水,而且他们对莫尔顿像六年前的肯尼迪一样试图“插队”参选感到不满。

    希利和该州其他多位知名民主党人一样,保持了中立。周日上午,在一场为州参议院临时议长造势的竞选活动中(该议长本人也面临初选挑战),当被问及她内心是否已做出决定时,她稍作犹豫后表示自己已有想法。

    “对马萨诸塞州而言,重要的是我们联邦代表团中要有能够为民众带来切实成果的领导人,能够与我作为州长合作,推进我希望在此地实现的目标,”希利说道。“民众对华盛顿的瘫痪状态深感沮丧。就是要去切实办成事情。”

    至于肯尼迪,他告诉CNN,尽管现任议员带来的从政经验有其好处,但有时也“会固化权力结构”。民主党人“应该好好审视那些维持现状的体制”,他说道。

    截至周日下午,他表示尚未决定周二将投给谁。

    在周六的集会上,马基谈到要在华盛顿再任职六年,称这是马萨诸塞州自1775年以来的革命传统的一部分,同时也谈到了该州废奴运动、妇女选举权运动、同性恋权利运动和医疗保健运动的本土根源。

    “我们就是革命者。感谢各位革命者今天加入我们,”他向欢呼的人群说道,并在演讲结束时随着马文·盖伊和塔米·特雷尔的《山高不可攀》尽情摇摆。

    头戴1775年风格帽子的马基,次日下午在阿灵顿的一场小型集会上谈到了继承保罗·里维尔的精神——他曾骑马穿过该镇警告民众国王的动向。事后在公园的野餐桌旁落座时,马基再次提及里维尔的著名骑行,称他多次面临初选挑战反映了该州的“基因构成”。

    他对将年龄作为竞选议题的说法不予理会,认为这是合理的讨论,但最终无关紧要。马基同样驳斥了《波士顿环球报》在支持莫尔顿的社论中提出的批评,即他在2020年对阵肯尼迪的竞选中做出的承诺并未兑现。他辩称,这一批评并未反映出他提出并支持的所有立法成果。

    “在我看来,重要的不是你的年龄,而是你的理念的时代性。在理念方面,我一直是世界上最年轻的人。所以,我向前看,引领方向,挑战的不仅是共和党建制派,还有民主党建制派,”马基说道。

    奥卡西奥-科特兹在本届初选周期中较2020年更晚才背书马基,此次也没有像上次那样现身他的集会。当CNN询问该如何解读这位国会女议员未出席周六与桑德斯共同举行的集会时,马基的助手并未回应。

    尽管如此,马基的竞选团队仍在努力激发左翼选民的热情,无论是最后请来桑德斯助阵、向大学民主党团体发送邮件提供学生免费坐在这位政治偶像身后的座位,还是与网红展开合作。竞选T恤是亮粉色的,背面的“AGONIZE”(使痛苦)被划掉,下方写着“ORGANIZE”(组织起来)。现场标牌被一名分发人员称为“彩虹埃德”或“埃德,红白蓝”。在倡导《绿色新政》时,马基有一句台词是“把那些石油公司的税收减免给我们!这就是社会主义!”,他知道这句台词能在观众中引发可靠的欢呼。

    他多次抨击莫尔顿,嘲讽道:“在众议院任职12年却几乎毫无建树,如今却突然声称自己当选参议员后就能成为超级巨星。我只是认为,没有任何证据能够支撑这种错误的前提。”

    马基承诺这将是他的最后一个任期,并表示不担心自己有能力胜任这项工作。

    今年以来,桑德斯一直在支持大量挑战现任议员的候选人。周六,他为马基展开了熟悉的指手画脚、情绪激昂的演讲。十多年前,《华盛顿邮报》在报道马基首次参议院就职派对时,曾将他和妻子描述为“二十多年来一直活跃在慈善晚宴和鸡尾酒会圈的常客”。

    “埃德明白共和党人不明白,也有太多民主党人不明白的道理:维持现状的政治和政策对工薪家庭不起作用,”桑德斯说道。

    华盛顿和马萨诸塞州的民主党领袖私下里往往会说,莫尔顿的行事风格被一些人认为傲慢自大、自以为是,这并未给他带来任何好处。因此,尽管他取得了一些立法胜利,比如协助创建了全国988自杀与危机生命线,但莫尔顿深知,如果等待空缺席位,他永远不会成为党内领袖们青睐的人选。

    这也意味着,与肯尼迪不同,莫尔顿在参选之初就清楚自己会招致一些敌意。

    周六下午,在波士顿郊区林恩的绿带凉亭前,一场活动设置了充气城堡和免费冰淇淋车,以鼓励选民前来拜访。莫尔顿看着凉亭外的场景,逐一列出了《波士顿环球报》民调中指出的问题:四分之一的马萨诸塞州居民表示考虑离开该州。

    “当我说赛斯时,你们喊服务!”一名竞选工作人员喊道,试图带动互动问答。

    活动结束后,人群散去,莫尔顿坐在树荫下的长椅上,表示将他描绘为温和派或企业说客的说法虚伪且不真诚。

    他说,此次竞选出现了“我未曾预料到的谎言程度”。他指责马基的竞选团队“充满负面文化”,并细数了多名工作人员和志愿者——他称——在辩论前他上前问候时拒绝与他握手的情况。当听到马基将他的连任竞选比作一场新的革命时,他翻了个白眼。当听到马基及其盟友大肆攻击他在2024年表示不支持跨性别女孩参加女子体育赛事的言论时,他感到恼火——他后来对此立场有所缓和。

    “他谴责特朗普为了政治目的将这些群体武器化,”莫尔顿说道。“那他现在在做什么?”

    莫尔顿对马基的批评直截了当:“我尊重你的工作,我自己也支持其中大部分内容。但你必须承认,这还不够。当我们的电费是全国平均水平的两倍时,你怎么能说你为能源政策感到自豪?当人们在这里买不起房子时,你怎么能说你为保障性住房的工作感到自豪?”

    就在莫尔顿阐述自己的观点时,他5岁的女儿跑了过来,向他展示自己在集市上被面部彩绘师画成了小猫的样子。

    他说,作为父亲的视角推动了他在竞选活动中提出的论点。

    “我的视野曾经可能是未来50年。现在则是未来100年,”莫尔顿说道。

    在这场竞选的背景下,这不仅仅是一种笼统的感受,莫尔顿解释道,他提到了自己的另一个女儿,并将其与8月的一场辩论中的一幕联系起来:当时马基在被问及如何使用人工智能时似乎有些力不从心。

    “六年后,我7岁的女儿将年满13岁,未来几年可能会使用社交媒体。我们都知道社交媒体对孩子有害,而这位如今已86岁的家伙甚至都不理解人工智能,还放任大型科技公司放松对社交媒体的监管,”莫尔顿说道。“有很多自私的理由让人希望参议院效率低下。”

    尽管莫尔顿没有声称自己代表一场革命,但他表示,他的获胜将在大选中产生更直接的连锁反应。

    “如果俄亥俄州或德克萨斯州的独立选民认为民主党人代表的是一个由80岁老人组成的政党,那么他们很难会投票给民主党,”莫尔顿说道。“你可能喜欢詹姆斯·塔拉里科,但说他将前往华盛顿加入埃德·马基这样的团队,与加入下一代领导者的团队,这之间有很大的区别。”

    无论结果如何,这可能都是马萨诸塞州最后一次举行此类竞选:11月的选票上有一个问题,将取消初选制度,采用像加州那样的无党派两轮选举制。

    An 80-year-old senator is asking for six more years — and pitching himself as revolutionary

    2026-08-31T16:00:29.379Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/31/politics/massachusetts-democratic-senate-primary-markey-moulton

    Arlington, Massachusetts—

    The Boston Tea Party wasn’t really about the tea, and it certainly wasn’t about the Mohawks though those were the costumes the colonists wore as they dumped the boxes overboard.

    In Tuesday’s Democratic Senate primary in deep blue Massachusetts, longtime Sen. Ed Markey is harking back to those revolutionary roots as he pitches himself to voters as the anti-establishment candidate against Rep. Seth Moulton – despite arriving to Washington just three years after Joe Biden did in 1973.

    Although the language of the left-wing insurgency surrounds the race, under the surface, the contest for many appears to be less about ideological issues or governing philosophies than a smash-up of ambition, efforts to secure Democratic power in the state in the future, and personal pique.

    Markey, 80, in one corner, is vowing to keep fighting for left-wing ideals, which include some successes and some that he hasn’t passed in all his years in power so far. In the other, Moulton, the 47-year-old decorated Marine and six-term congressman who has frustrated Nancy Pelosi and many other Democrats by repeatedly challenging their leadership, has staked his campaign on generational change.

    While the race has been cast as the last big existential Democratic primary of the midterms cycle, voters across Markey and Moulton events told CNN they struggle to make sense of where they fit into the great intraparty debate this contest has been made out to be, and even what the word “progressive” means anymore.

    “I think for me it’s just like you’re committed to helping the working class, committed to lifting up underrepresented groups. I don’t have one issue that if you’re not committed to that, you’re not progressive,” said Northeastern law student Collin Rue, who stood with other university students as the backdrop for Markey’s Saturday rally at an International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers union hall in Dorchester. The event was headlined by Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and senior Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

    “I love being progressive,” said linguist Lisa Lavoie, who came to a Moulton-funded party on the Lynn, Massachusetts, common on Saturday afternoon, noting that the question reminded her of some of her struggles teaching English as a second language. “People who use the words get to define what they mean, just like Starbucks with their ‘Grande’ and ‘Venti’… I see it as moving past the established systems so that everyone has a reasonable chance.”

    Backstage at the Markey rally where she was one of the marquee speakers, Warren — who in 2012 won her seat as the outsider progressive hero — told CNN her current definition: “Progressives are people who believe that government should play a role in expanding opportunity for everyone, not just helping funnel more resources to those at the top.”

    Markey’s definition of progressivism to CNN was a list of ideas that he’s been pushing but so far hasn’t passed: “Medicare for All, Green New Deal, Trans Bill of Rights, taxing billionaires, cutting, slashing the defense budget, transferring the funding over to healthcare, education, environmental justice.”

    Moulton’s answer: “In my view, it means actually making progress, and I think that’s a big difference, because there’s no question that Senator Markey is good at the press release, good at a perfectly worded statement that’s not going to offend everybody, but he hasn’t done much.”

    The primary is dicey for Massachusetts’ Democratic leaders. Markey doesn’t inspire broad passion, and many assumed his 2020 victory — when then-Rep. Joe Kennedy III tried to take him out in the primary — would be his swan song, a career ending on his terms. Progressive stalwart Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York helped galvanize Markey’s campaign that year after he stood with her to introduce the Green New Deal.

    In private conversations, state leaders say they’re stuck between feeling like the senator is going through the motions and a personal dislike for Moulton.

    The potential of a Markey win is also being weighed through the prism of the possibility of both Senate seats and the governor’s office being open in the next few years. Warren will be 81 when her current term expires in 2031 and state Democrats suspect Gov. Maura Healey will want a job in a future presidential administration.

    Eager younger Massachusetts Democrats aren’t too eager to rock a boat they may want to sail on themselves, and they’re not happy that Moulton, like Kennedy six years ago, is trying to jump the line.

    Healey, like many of the state’s other better-known Democrats, stayed neutral. Asked on Sunday morning at a campaign event boosting the state Senate president pro tempore – who’s facing his own primary challenge – whether she’s landed on a decision in her own head, she hesitated slightly before saying she thinks so.

    “What’s important to Massachusetts is that we have leadership in the federal delegation that’s going to get real results for people and that will be a partner with me as governor in doing the things that I want to see happen here,” Healey said. “People are so frustrated that DC seems so broken. It’s like, go get stuff done.”

    As for Kennedy, he told CNN that while the experience that comes with incumbency can have benefits, there are times when it “calcifies power.” Democrats “would do well to examine the structures that perpetuate a status quo,” he said.

    As of Sunday afternoon, he said he had not made up his mind who to vote for on Tuesday.

    At the Saturday rally, Markey talked about getting another six years in Washington as part of a Massachusetts tradition of revolution going back to 1775, but also spoke of the local roots of the abolitionist, suffragette, gay rights and healthcare movements.

    “We are the revolutionaries. Thank you, revolutionaries, for joining us today,” he told the cheering crowd, and finished his speech by doing an extended bop to Marvin Gaye and Tammi Terrell’s “Ain’t No Mountain High Enough.”

    Markey, wearing a 1775 cap, spoke to a smaller gathering in Arlington the next afternoon about picking up the spirit of Paul Revere as he rode through the town warning of a king. Sitting at a picnic table in a park afterwards, Markey again invoked Revere’s famous ride as he claimed that his repeated primary challengers reflect “the genetic make-up” of the state.

    He brushed off mentions of his age as fair game but ultimately insignificant. Markey likewise dismissed the Boston Globe’s complaint in its endorsement of Moulton that he hasn’t delivered on the promises made in the Kennedy race, arguing that the critique was not reflective of all the legislation he’s put together and signed onto.

    “From my perspective, it’s not your age, it is the age of your ideas, and I’ve always been the youngest guy in the world when it comes to ideas. So, I look ahead, I lead the way, and I challenge the establishment, not only from the Republican Party, but from the Democratic Party as well,” Markey said.

    Ocasio-Cortez endorsed him much later this cycle than in 2020, and without the verve or presence by his side this time around. An aide did not answer CNN when asked how to read the congresswoman’s decision not to join the rally with Sanders on Saturday.

    Still, Markey’s campaign has been trying to drum up energy on the left, whether through pulling in Sanders at the end, the email blast to college Democratic groups offering students free seats behind the political icon as he spoke, or leaning into collaborations with influencers. Campaign shirts are bright pink, with the word “AGONIZE” crossed out on the back and “ORGANIZE” written under. Signs are printed in what one staffer handing them out called “Rainbow Ed” or “Ed, White and Blue.” As he advocates for the Green New Deal, Markey has a line about cutting tax breaks for oil companies —“Give us some of that socialism!” — that he knows to work into his speeches for reliable cheers from his crowds.

    He ripped repeatedly into Moulton, sneering, “after being in the House of Representatives for 12 years and accomplishing very little, that all of a sudden he’ll be superstar if he goes to the Senate. I just don’t think the evidence is there in order to, in any way, defend that erroneous premise.”

    Markey has promised this will be his last term and says he has no concerns about his ability to do it capably.

    After spending the year backing an extensive list of challengers to incumbents, in this race, Sanders on Saturday summoned the familiar finger pointing and reddening of the race for Markey, a man who over a decade ago was described along with his wife in a Washington Post write-up of his first Senate swearing in party as “regulars on the charity gala/cocktail party circuit for more than two decades.”

    “Ed understands what Republicans don’t and too many Democrats don’t: That status quo politics and status quo policies are not working for working families,” Sanders said.

    Moulton, Democratic leaders in Washington and Massachusetts tend to say privately, hasn’t done himself any favors with an approach some find standoffish and self-righteous. So, though he’s racked up some legislative wins, like helping create the national 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, Moulton knew that if he waited for an open seat, he’d never be the one party leaders turned to.

    That’s also meant he, unlike Kennedy, came into the race more comfortable with knowing he was going to get some hate.

    Looking out from a gazebo on the greenway in the Boston suburb of Lynn at a bouncy house and free ice cream truck meant to encourage voters to stop by, Moulton on Saturday afternoon ticked through the problems identified in a Boston Globe survey that showed one in four Massachusetts residents saying they considered leaving the state.

    “When I say Seth, you say service!” a campaign worker shouted, trying to get a call-and-response going.

    Sitting on a bench in the shade as the crowd dissipated afterwards, Moulton said the efforts to paint him as a moderate or corporate shill are hypocritical and disingenuous.

    He said there’s been “a level of lying that I did not expect.” He tagged the Markey campaign with a “culture of negativity,” recounting how many staffers and volunteers he says refused to shake his hand when he went over to greet them before their debates. He rolled his eyes at hearing Markey compare his reelection campaign to a new revolution. He got exasperated to hear how much Markey and allies have attacked him over saying in 2024 that he wasn’t in favor of trans kids playing girls’ sports – a stance he’s somewhat backtracked on.

    “He decries Trump for weaponizing these people for political purposes,” Moulton said. “What is he doing?”

    Moulton’s case against Markey is straightforward: “I respect your work, and I’ve supported much of it myself. But you’ve got to admit it hasn’t been enough. How can you say you’re proud of your energy policy when our electric bills are twice the national average? How can say that you’re proud of your work on affordable housing when people can’t afford to live here?”

    As Moulton made his case, his five-year-old daughter came by to show him how she’d been turned into a kitty cat by the face painter at the fair.

    The perspective of being a father, he said, helped push him into the argument he’s been making on the trail.

    “My horizon used to be maybe 50 years out. Now it’s like 100 years,” Moulton said.

    In the context of this race, that’s more than just a general feeling, Moulton explained, bringing up his other daughter and connecting it to a moment in an August debate when Markey seemed to struggle when asked about using artificial intelligence.

    “Six years from now, my 7-year-old will be 13, getting on social media probably within the next few years when we know it hurts kids because the guy who’s now 86 doesn’t even understand AI and gave free rein to big tech to deregulate social media,” Moulton said. “There’s a lot of selfish reasons people want an ineffective Senate.”

    While not claiming to represent a revolution, Moulton said his win would have a more immediate ripple effect in the general election.

    “It’s going to be hard for independent voters in Ohio or Texas to vote for a Democrat if they think he or she represents a party of 80-year-olds,” Moulton argued. “You might love James Talarico, but there’s a big difference between saying he’s going to go to Washington and be a part of a group like Ed Markey versus a next generation leader.”

    Whatever happens, this may be the last time Massachusetts does a race like this: one of the questions on the ballot in November would eliminate primaries in favor of a non-partisan, top-two system like that of California.

湘ICP备2026001899号-2