分类: 未分类

  • 明尼苏达州州长蒂姆·瓦尔兹和司法部长基思·埃利森在周三众议院听证会上面临共和党人连珠炮式的尖锐质问,该听证会聚焦于该州重大欺诈丑闻,多数问题集中在一个核心主题上:他们知道些什么?何时知道的?


    瓦尔兹和埃利森多次被问及首次意识到欺诈问题的具体时间,且遭到包括弗吉尼亚·福克斯议员在内的共和党议员的严厉指责。

    “你没有履职,你没有履职,”福克斯对瓦尔兹说,“你没有保护纳税人的钱。你允许大规模欺诈。你和埃利森先生允许明尼苏达州发生大规模欺诈。不幸的是,正如有人所说,在目前这个阶段你无法被追究个人责任。”

    共和党众议员吉姆·乔丹与瓦尔兹的一段对话立即在社交媒体上引发保守派的强烈反对。

    “你为什么不说实话,解释你为何重启付款?”乔丹在周三关于明尼苏达州欺诈问题的众议院监督委员会听证会上问道。

    这段对话围绕瓦尔兹过去的公开声明展开,即一名法官在2021年4月下令明尼苏达州教育部在因欺诈担忧暂停付款后继续报销。

    乔丹指出,2022年法院授权的一份新闻稿中,当时的拉姆齐县地区法院法官约翰·H·古特曼对州长对事件的描述提出了异议。

    “所以要么你在撒谎,要么法院在撒谎。我只是问你,是哪一个?”乔丹说。

    争议最大的对话之一发生在共和党众议员南希·梅斯的质问中,她追问瓦尔兹该州有多少儿童,自闭症护理支出大幅增加的具体数字,以及为何在瓦尔兹没有给出具体数字的情况下仍发生这种情况。

    “好吧,你之前的借口是——你不知道2017年的自闭症数字——因为你当时不是州长,而今天作为州长你无法回答2024年的数字,你还说你为今天的听证会做了准备。这简直难以置信。”

    瓦尔兹反驳说,他不会成为梅斯的“道具”,她最终说:“我希望你了解这些信息。谢天谢地,你不是美国副总统。”

    共和党众议员克莱·希金斯在另一个激烈时刻质问埃利森,要求他声称自己正在领导打击腐败的斗争,但埃利森没有给出他想要的具体答案,希金斯随后要求埃利森辞职。

    “我不是在谈论医疗补助欺诈,别躲在这后面,”希金斯打断埃利森说,“你有权对州长要求你做的任何事情进行刑事起诉,这件事规模很大。先生,我给你一个机会,你是否在全面领导针对这一重大欺诈的刑事调查工作……还是没有?”希金斯追问。

    “我们是在依法行事,”埃利森说,希金斯再次打断了他。

    “你没有在领导,主席先生,我要说,明尼苏达州的总检察长应该辞职,”希金斯说。

    听证会结束时,气氛再次紧张,共和党众议员尼克·朗沃西建议,尽管瓦尔兹因欺诈丑闻退出竞选连任,但仍在任内的他应因“渎职”被弹劾,并援引明尼苏达州自己的州宪法。

    福克斯新闻数字频道的阿什利·卡纳汉对本报道有贡献。

    Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison faced a barrage of tough questions from Republicans during a Wednesday House hearing on the massive fraud scandal in the state, with most of the questions focused on one key theme: What did they know, and when did they know it?

    Walz and Ellison were asked multiple times for specifics regarding when they were first made aware of the fraud problems and faced sharp rebukes from Republican members, including Rep. Virginia Foxx.

    “You did not do your job, you did not do your job,” Foxx told Walz. “You did not protect taxpayer dollars. You allowed massive fraud. You and Mr. Ellison allowed massive fraud to go on in the state of Minnesota. It is unfortunate, as somebody said, that you can’t be held personally responsible at this stage in the game.”

    An exchange between GOP Rep. Jim Jordan and Walz sparked immediate pushback from conservatives on social media.

    “Why didn’t you tell the truth about why you restarted the payments?” Jordan asked during a House Oversight Committee hearing on Minnesota fraud on Wednesday.

    The exchange centered on Walz’s past public statements that a judge ordered the Minnesota Department of Education to continue reimbursements in April 2021 after the agency had halted payments over fraud concerns.

    Jordan pointed to a 2022 court-authorized news release from then-Ramsey County District Court Judge John H. Guthmann that disputed the governor’s characterization of the events.

    “So either you’re lying or the court’s lying. And I’m just asking you which one is it?” Jordan said.

    One of the most contentious exchanges came during questioning from GOP Rep. Nancy Mace when she pressed Walz for specific numbers on how many children are in his state, the massive increase in autism care spending and why that occurred without getting specific numbers back from Walz.

    “Ok, so your excuse before — that you didn’t know what the 2017 autism numbers were — because you were not governor, and today you can’t answer the numbers about 2024 as governor, and you still said you prepared for this hearing today. It’s unbelievable.”

    Walz shot back that he wouldn’t be a “prop” for Mace, and she eventually said, “I expect you to know this information. Thank God you’re not vice president of the United States.”

    GOP Rep. Clay Higgins confronted Ellison in another heated moment asking him to say he was “leading” the fight against rooting out corruption without getting the specific answer he was looking for, prompting him to call for Ellison’s resignation.

    “I’m not talking about Medicaid fraud, don’t hide behind that,” Higgins said, interrupting Ellison. “You have the authority to prosecute anything criminally that the governor asks you to, and this thing is big. I’m giving you an opportunity sir, are you leading the criminal investigative effort into this massive fraud across the board…or not?” Higgins pressed.

    “We are following the law,” Ellison said before Higgins cut him off again.

    “You are not leading, I’m going to say, Mr. Chairman, that the attorney general of the state of Minnesota should resign,” Higgins said.

    At the close of the hearing, things became tense again when GOP Rep. Nick Langworthy suggested that Walz, who is still serving as governor despite dropping out of his re-election bid due to the fraud scandal, should be impeached for “malfeasance,” citing Minnesota’s own state Constitution.

    Fox News Digital’s Ashley Carnahan contributed to this report.

  • 美国部分医学院将根据政府协议教授营养学


    2026年3月5日 11:06 UTC / 路透社

    • 摘要
    • 该协议是特朗普”让美国再次健康”议程的一部分
    • 52所医学院将提供40小时营养学教育
    • 联邦官员称特朗普政府不会支配课程设置

    华盛顿3月5日电(路透社)- 美国卫生与公众服务部一位高级官员表示,作为与唐纳德·特朗普总统政府达成的协议的一部分,约四分之一的美国医学院将于今年秋季扩大营养学教育项目。

    卫生部长小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪(Robert F. Kennedy Jr.)和教育部长琳达·麦卡恩(Linda McMahon)为推动这一协议,该协议是特朗普”让美国再次健康”议程的一部分,该议程倡导健康饮食,并为肯尼迪全面改革联邦疫苗政策的行动提供了支持。

    路透社伊朗简报通讯为您提供伊朗战争最新动态和分析。点击此处注册。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    根据该自愿承诺,52所医学院将从2026年秋季开始提供40小时的营养学教育或等效的40小时能力培养课程,该官员表示。特朗普政府不会支配课程设置,该官员称。

    肯尼迪表示,此类营养学教育对于更好地使医生能够就与饮食相关的慢性病向患者提供建议是必要的。

    美国约有200所经认证的医学院,其中约160所授予医学博士学位,其余的授予骨科医学博士学位。

    该官员表示,参与自愿承诺的大多数学校是授予医学博士学位的机构,但没有详细说明具体比例。

    上周在华盛顿发表讲话时,肯尼迪描述了与医学院、考试管理机构和认证机构合作设计该协议的过程。

    他表示,一些医学院犹豫是因为他们认为该协议带有党派色彩。特朗普政府已努力影响高等教育,例如以削减联邦资金相威胁,针对大学的多元化项目和变性学生政策,引发了对言论自由和学术自由的担忧。

    “很多学校不愿意参与,因为他们认为这是特朗普的项目,”肯尼迪在2月24日由全国县协会举办的会议上说。

    “我们已经能够说服他们,不存在共和党孩子或民主党孩子这样的情况。我们都希望我们的孩子健康。”

    利娅·道格拉斯(Leah Douglas)在华盛顿报道;马修·刘易斯(Matthew Lewis)编辑

    我们的标准:汤森路透信托原则。

    Some US medical schools to teach nutrition under government deal

    March 5, 2026 11:06 AM UTC / Reuters

    • Summary
    • Deal part of Trump’s Make America Healthy Again agenda
    • Fifty-two medical schools to offer 40 hours of nutrition education
    • Trump administration will not dictate curriculum, says federal official

    WASHINGTON, March 5 (Reuters) – About a fourth of U.S. medical schools will ‌expand their nutrition education offerings this autumn as part of a deal with the administration of President Donald Trump, according to a senior official with the Department of Health and Human Services.

    Health ​Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Education Secretary Linda McMahon have pursued ​the deal as part of Trump’s Make America Healthy Again agenda, which promotes healthy ⁠eating and has also underpinned Kennedy’s actions to overhaul federal vaccine policy.

    The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Under the voluntary ​commitment, 52 medical schools will administer 40 hours of nutrition education or a ​40-hour competency equivalent starting in autumn 2026, said the official. The Trump administration will not dictate the curriculum, the official said.

    Kennedy has said such nutrition education is necessary to better equip doctors ​to advise patients on diet-related chronic disease.

    There are about 200 accredited medical schools ​in the U.S., roughly 160 of which offer doctor of medicine degrees. The remainder offer ‌doctor of ⁠osteopathic medicine degrees.

    The majority of the schools joining the voluntary commitment are MD-granting institutions, said the official, without elaborating on the breakdown.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Speaking in Washington last week, Kennedy described working with medical schools, exam administrators and accreditors to design the agreement.

    He ​said some medical schools ​hesitated because they ⁠perceived the deal to be partisan. The Trump administration has made efforts to influence higher education, like threatening to cut federal funding ​to universities over diversity programs and policies for transgender students, raising ​concerns about ⁠free speech and academic freedom.

    “A lot of them didn’t want to do it because they thought it was a Trump program,” Kennedy said on February 24 at a ⁠conference held ​by the National Association of Counties.

    “We’ve been able ​to convince them that there’s no such thing as Republican children or Democratic children. We all want ​our kids to be healthy.”

    Reporting by Leah Douglas in Washington; Editing by Matthew Lewis

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 卡尼吁加澳携手合作 加强对抗霸权 | 联合早报


    发布/2026年3月5日 18:03

    (堪培拉综合电)加拿大总理卡尼星期四提出,加拿大与澳大利亚应成为战略伙伴而非竞争对手,两国携手合作将加强与包括美国在内的超级大国谈判的实力。

    卡尼星期四(3月5日)访问澳洲期间向澳洲国会发表演讲,这是自2007年以来加拿大领导人首次在澳洲国会发言。

    卡尼说,他此次来访是为了在全球架构因接连不断的危机而分崩离析之际,重申渥太华与堪培拉的同盟关系。他指出,加澳虽然在地理上相隔遥远,但理应成为“战略表亲”。

    他说:“在旧世界……我们倾向于把彼此视为竞争对手。在新世界,我们应该成为战略合作伙伴,在提升战略自主性的同时,加大投资、加快技术合作,增强供应链韧性,以及扩大国内加工能力。”

    卡尼说,在大国竞争的世界中,中等强国面临的选择是:要么争取大国青睐,要么联合起来增强实力。他认为,中等强国的当务之急是制定规范,并参与制定新规则,以共同应对日益被霸权大国主导的世界格局。

    他强调:“中等强国不能仅仅筑起更高的墙,并退到墙后。我们必须共同合作。”

    澳洲总理阿尔巴尼斯星期四在国会致辞时也说,卡尼来访反映了加澳在世界舞台上发挥更大作用的共同抱负。

    阿尔巴尼斯说:“澳洲和加拿大是正在变化的世界中的中等强国。我们无法逆转变革,但可以支持自己与我们的公民,同时互相支持。”

    卡尼指出,两国可以合作发展战略优势的领域包括关键矿物、人工智能(AI)、贸易,以及无人机和卫星等防御设备。

    他也宣布,加澳当天早些时候签订了一系列与关键矿产有关的新协议,包括澳洲加入七国集团(G7)矿产联盟。

    这个联盟由加拿大主导,是全球拥有主要矿产储备的民主国家组成的最大集团,旨在促进全球关键矿产的多样化,并保障生产和供应。加拿大和澳洲共生产全球约三分之一的锂和铀,以及超过40%的铁矿石。

    澳洲是卡尼亚太之行的第二站。他此前已访问印度,星期五(6日)离开澳洲后将续程前往日本。

    卡尼吁加澳携手合作 加强对抗霸权 | 联合早报

    发布/2026年3月5日 18:03

    (堪培拉综合电)加拿大总理卡尼星期四提出,加拿大与澳大利亚应成为战略伙伴而非竞争对手,两国携手合作将加强与包括美国在内的超级大国谈判的实力。

    卡尼星期四(3月5日)访问澳洲期间向澳洲国会发表演讲,这是自2007年以来加拿大领导人首次在澳洲国会发言。

    卡尼说,他此次来访是为了在全球架构因接连不断的危机而分崩离析之际,重申渥太华与堪培拉的同盟关系。他指出,加澳虽然在地理上相隔遥远,但理应成为“战略表亲”。

    他说:“在旧世界……我们倾向于把彼此视为竞争对手。在新世界,我们应该成为战略合作伙伴,在提升战略自主性的同时,加大投资、加快技术合作,增强供应链韧性,以及扩大国内加工能力。”

    卡尼说,在大国竞争的世界中,中等强国面临的选择是:要么争取大国青睐,要么联合起来增强实力。他认为,中等强国的当务之急是制定规范,并参与制定新规则,以共同应对日益被霸权大国主导的世界格局。

    他强调:“中等强国不能仅仅筑起更高的墙,并退到墙后。我们必须共同合作。”

    澳洲总理阿尔巴尼斯星期四在国会致辞时也说,卡尼来访反映了加澳在世界舞台上发挥更大作用的共同抱负。

    阿尔巴尼斯说:“澳洲和加拿大是正在变化的世界中的中等强国。我们无法逆转变革,但可以支持自己与我们的公民,同时互相支持。”

    卡尼指出,两国可以合作发展战略优势的领域包括关键矿物、人工智能(AI)、贸易,以及无人机和卫星等防御设备。

    他也宣布,加澳当天早些时候签订了一系列与关键矿产有关的新协议,包括澳洲加入七国集团(G7)矿产联盟。

    这个联盟由加拿大主导,是全球拥有主要矿产储备的民主国家组成的最大集团,旨在促进全球关键矿产的多样化,并保障生产和供应。加拿大和澳洲共生产全球约三分之一的锂和铀,以及超过40%的铁矿石。

    澳洲是卡尼亚太之行的第二站。他此前已访问印度,星期五(6日)离开澳洲后将续程前往日本。

  • 肯尼迪成立新美国自闭症研究小组,将调查潜在病因


    2026年3月5日 上午11:08 UTC / 路透社

    美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)部长小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪在美国华盛顿特区卫生与公众服务部的新闻发布会上,讨论了美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)最新自闭症及发育障碍监测(ADDM)网络调查的结果,… 继续阅读

    • 摘要
    • 新小组包含疫苗怀疑论者,引发自闭症专家担忧
    • 小组或探讨争议性疫苗关联
    • 外部专家警告,聚焦疫苗研究可能转移自闭症其他研究资金

    华盛顿,3月5日(路透社) – 根据一些新小组成员的说法,卫生部长小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪重组的美国自闭症咨询委员会纳入了疫苗怀疑论者,旨在引导联邦研究资金用于调查自闭症病因及其他共病问题,如共存的医疗障碍。

    肯尼迪是长期反疫苗活动家,曾暗示接种疫苗会导致自闭症,这与科学证据相悖。他于1月重组了跨机构自闭症协调委员会,新任命21名公众成员。新委员会中超过三分之一的成员也宣扬被揭穿的疫苗与自闭症之间的关联。

    立即订阅《每日法讯》新闻通讯,获取最新法律新闻,直抵您的收件箱。立即注册

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    一些自闭症专家,包括前委员会成员,表示新成员可能会损害联邦自闭症研究。本周,一些前成员成立了自己的替代咨询委员会,这是公共卫生专家对肯尼迪改革联邦疫苗政策以及他所监管机构传播的错误信息感到担忧的最新举措。

    尚无严格研究发现自闭症与疫苗或药物之间存在关联。自闭症专家将自闭症发病率上升主要归因于诊断标准更加包容。

    该委员会定于3月19日首次召开会议,将为肯尼迪提供关于联邦自闭症研究重点的非约束性指导,包括如何分配数亿美元研究资金的建议。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    肯尼迪向唐纳德·特朗普总统承诺,他将找出自闭症的病因,大多数研究人员认为自闭症部分与遗传因素以及子宫内暴露于污染物或有害物质有关。肯尼迪的”让美国再次健康”运动(Make America Healthy Again)的许多支持者(其中一些人被任命为委员会成员)也认为疫苗会导致自闭症,并主张减少儿童接种次数。

    委员会主席西尔维娅·福格尔(Sylvia Fogel)是哈佛医学院的精神病学家和讲师,她告诉路透社,委员会将解决自闭症研究中的空白,如病因触发因素,以更好地服务于重度自闭症患者及其家庭。

    “自闭症并非单一疾病。联邦策略应反映其复杂性,而非将其简单化,”福格尔说。

    卫生与公众服务部发言人安德鲁·尼克松(Andrew Nixon)表示,新委员会旨在团结不同的声音,”扩大委员会的视角并不改变联邦研究以严谨科学为基础的事实。”

    部分成员将疫苗与自闭症联系起来


    在1月改革之前,西蒙斯基金会(Simons Foundation)和自闭症之声(Autism Speaks)等主要自闭症组织,以及约翰·霍普金斯大学和塔夫茨大学等高校的研究人员构成了委员会21名公众成员的主体。

    根据2024年草案报告,该小组建议进一步研究共病的身体和行为健康状况,如癫痫、胃肠道问题和焦虑症。

    自闭症之声倡导副总裁大卫·西特科夫斯基(David Sitcovsky)在一份声明中表示,更广泛的代表性将加强委员会,但影响将取决于是否保持科学基础。

    新小组包含更多活动家,自闭症自我倡导者仅3人(法律规定的最低人数),而之前为7人,研究型大学代表也寥寥无几。路透社对成员公开声明和隶属关系的审查显示,至少有8人与疫苗导致自闭症有关联,或与支持这些说法的组织有联系,其中一些人称其子女接种疫苗后患上自闭症。

    小组成员金杰·泰勒(Ginger Taylor)创建了名为”疫苗如何导致自闭症”的网站,她在Substack帖子中写道,委员会的首要任务是调查疫苗与自闭症之间的关联。

    新成员约翰·吉尔摩(John Gilmore)是自闭症行动网络(Autism Action Network)联合创始人,他表示自己26岁的儿子接种疫苗后患上自闭症,希望引导更多研究关注自闭症发病率上升问题。

    “现在委员会中的许多声音被刻意排除了20多年,”他说。

    包括吉尔摩和福格尔在内的几名成员,参加了9月由MAHA研究所主办的自闭症活动小组讨论,MAHA研究所所长马克·戈顿(Mark Gorton)是反疫苗活动家,也是肯尼迪2024年总统竞选的重要资助者。

    当被问及部分成员对疫苗的看法如何影响委员会工作时,福格尔表示,针对麻疹腮腺炎风疹(MMR)疫苗和含硫柳汞疫苗的研究未显示与自闭症存在因果关系。

    “现有证据非常充分,必须予以承认,”福格尔说。

    不过,她表示,研究应探讨各种暴露因素(包括免疫或炎症应激)如何影响自闭症结果。

    专家担忧


    周二,十几名自闭症倡导者、研究人员和几名前委员会成员成立了独立自闭症协调委员会,制定自己的自闭症研究战略计划。

    自闭症科学基金会主席、前政府委员会成员艾莉森·辛格(Alison Singer)表示,将联邦资金投入研究疫苗与自闭症之间的关联(大多数专家认为这是既定科学),会削减对其他研究机会的资助,如自闭症的遗传率或与环境暴露的关联。

    “美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的资金并非无底洞,”辛格说,”如果我们将有限资源投入重新调查疫苗,就没有资金研究自闭症的实际潜在病因。”

    路透社报道,记者 Leah Douglas 和 Ahmed Aboulenein
    编辑:Caroline Humer 和 Bill Berkrot

    我们的标准:路透社信托原则。

    Kennedy’s new US autism panel to examine potential causes

    March 5, 2026 11:08 AM UTC / Reuters

    U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. discusses the findings of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) latest Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network survey, during a press conference at the Department of Health and Human Services in Washington, D.C., U.S.,… Read more

    • Summary
    • New panel includes vaccine skeptics, raising concerns among autism experts
    • Panel could explore controversial vaccine links
    • Outside experts warn focus on vaccines may divert funds from other autism research

    WASHINGTON, March 5 (Reuters) – A U.S. autism advisory board remade by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to include vaccine skeptics aims to steer federal research spending toward investigating causes of the condition, as well as other issues ​like co-occurring medical disorders, according to some new panel members.

    Kennedy, a longtime anti-vaccine activist who has suggested the inoculations cause autism, contrary to scientific evidence, reset the Interagency Autism Coordinating ‌Committee in January with 21 new public members. More than a third of the new committee members have also promoted the debunked link between vaccines and autism.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Some autism experts, including former committee members, have said the new members could undermine federal autism research. This week, some former members created their own alternative advisory board, the latest in a series of similar efforts by public health experts concerned about Kennedy’s overhaul of federal vaccine policy and what they see as misinformation coming from agencies he ​oversees.

    No rigorous studies have found links between autism and vaccines or medications. Autism experts attribute rising rates of the condition largely to more inclusive diagnosis criteria.

    The committee, due to first meet ​on March 19, will provide non-binding guidance to Kennedy on federal autism research priorities, including recommendations on allocating hundreds of millions of dollars in research spending.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Kennedy ⁠has promised President Donald Trump he will identify the cause of autism, which most researchers suggest is linked in part to genetics and exposure in utero to pollutants or harmful contaminants. Many of Kennedy’s supporters in ​the Make America Healthy Again movement – some of whom were named to the committee – also believe vaccines can cause autism and advocate for fewer childhood vaccinations.

    Committee chair Sylvia Fogel, a psychiatrist and instructor at Harvard Medical ​School, told Reuters the committee will address gaps in autism research like causal triggers in an effort to better serve people with profound autism and their families.

    “Autism is not monolithic. Federal strategy should reflect that complexity rather than flatten it,” Fogel said.

    Department of Health and Human Services spokesman Andrew Nixon said the new committee is meant to unite a range of voices and that “expanding perspectives on the panel does not change the fact that federal research is grounded in rigorous ​science.”

    SOME MEMBERS LINK VACCINES AND AUTISM


    Until January’s overhaul, major autism groups like the Simons Foundation and Autism Speaks, and researchers from universities including Johns Hopkins and Tufts accounted for most of the committee’s 21 members ​from the public.

    That panel recommended further research into co-occurring physical and behavioral health conditions, like epilepsy, gastrointestinal issues and anxiety disorders, according to a draft 2024 report.

    David Sitcovsky, vice president of advocacy at Autism Speaks, said in a ‌statement that broader ⁠representation would strengthen the committee, but that its impact would depend on retaining a grounding in science.

    The new panel contains more activists, just three autistic self-advocates – the minimum required by law – down from seven, and few representatives from research universities. At least eight have tied vaccination to autism or are connected to organizations that support those claims, including several who say their children developed autism after being vaccinated, according to a Reuters review of their public statements and affiliations.

    Panel member Ginger Taylor, who created a website called “How Do Vaccines Cause Autism?”, wrote in a Substack post that her top priority for the committee is investigating the link ​between vaccines and autism.

    John Gilmore, a new panel ​member and co-founder of the Autism Action Network ⁠who says his 26-year-old son developed autism after being vaccinated, said he wants to steer more research toward rising autism rates.

    “A lot of the voices that are on the (committee) now have been deliberately excluded for 20-odd years,” he said.

    Several, including Gilmore and Fogel, appeared on panels at a September autism event hosted by ​the MAHA Institute, whose president, Mark Gorton, is an anti-vaccine activist and was a significant funder of Kennedy’s 2024 presidential campaign.

    Asked how some members’ views ​on vaccines will affect the ⁠committee’s work, Fogel said studies of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and thimerosal-containing vaccines have not shown a causal link to autism.

    “That body of available evidence is substantial and must be acknowledged,” Fogel said.

    Still, research should examine how various exposures, including immune or inflammatory stress, might affect autism outcomes, she said.

    EXPERT CONCERNS


    On Tuesday, a dozen autism advocates, researchers and several former committee members formed the Independent Autism Coordination Committee to create its own strategic plan for autism ⁠research.

    Alison Singer, ​president of the Autism Science Foundation and a prior government committee member, said investing federal dollars into researching a link between ​vaccines and autism, which most experts consider settled science, would cut into funding for other research opportunities, like autism’s heritability or link to environmental exposures.

    “There’s not a bottomless pit of money at the NIH that can be used to fund research,” Singer said. “If ​we devote our very limited resources towards reinvestigating vaccines, we won’t have money to look at actual potential causes of autism.”

    Reporting by Leah Douglas and Ahmed Aboulenein in Washington; Editing by Caroline Humer and Bill Berkrot

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 他们曾在伊拉克作战,如今却成民主党中反对对伊朗开战的最响亮声音


    作者:劳伦·福克斯(Lauren Fox)、莎拉·费里斯(Sarah Ferris)
    1小时31分钟前发布
    发布时间:2026年3月5日,美国东部时间凌晨5:30

    众议员尤金·温德曼(Eugene Vindman)周三在华盛顿特区发表讲话。
    布莱恩·多齐尔(Bryan Dozier)/NURPHO/美联社

    众议员尤金·温德曼(Eugene Vindman)是一代因中东“持久战”经历而投身国会的年轻民主党人之一。

    这些民主党人是对唐纳德·特朗普总统决定将美国卷入对伊朗战争的最早、最直言不讳的批评者——这一立场使他们与党内一些更倾向干预主义的成员产生分歧。

    “我不会为伊朗政权和阿亚图拉(指伊朗最高领袖)流泪。我理解威胁,但也明白战争容易开始、难以结束。”曾是25年军龄老兵的温德曼周三上午在美国国会大厦外与六位民主党退伍军人并肩站立时表示,“将美国的鲜血和财富投入到这场我们本不必参与的冲突中,这是一种承诺。”

    3月2日,一架隶属于第37打击战斗机中队的F/A-18E“超级大黄蜂”战机降落在东地中海“杰拉尔德·R·福特”号航母的飞行甲板上。
    美国海军

    “当华盛顿的精英们敲起战争鼓点,捶胸顿足,谈论战争代价并表现得强硬时,他们根本不会想到自己要去打仗。”科罗拉多州众议员杰森·克劳(Jason Crow)补充道,他曾在伊拉克执行过三次任务。

    党内领袖,包括众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯(Hakeem Jeffries),正在放大这些声音,民主党人正试图在战争迅速升级的余波中寻求出路。尽管温德曼和他的民主党退伍军人同僚们知道,在共和党主导的国会中阻止特朗普的行动几乎没有胜算,但他们正试图向持怀疑态度的美国公众发声——认为特朗普政府违背了中期选举前几个月的核心承诺。

    但这对民主党人来说是一条艰难的路线。党内领袖正在努力应对党内的尖锐分歧,尤其是亲以色列派系预计将在周四的关键众议院投票中违抗领导,试图限制特朗普在海外的军事权力。宾夕法尼亚州参议员约翰·费特曼(John Fetterman)是周三参议院中唯一反对类似投票的民主党人。

    3月3日周二,参议员约翰·费特曼在华盛顿特区国会山对记者发表讲话。
    伊丽莎白·弗兰茨(Elizabeth Frantz)/路透社

    目前,大多数民主党人坚决谴责特朗普未经国会批准就对伊朗发动打击的决定。但该党也将很快被迫面对支持在伊朗冲突中部署美军的现实,包括是否要再投入数十亿美元以维持美国行动的问题。

    党内领袖急于避免重蹈覆辙,避免重蹈20多年前伊拉克战争中困扰他们的分裂局面。他们也清楚,这场冲突可能持续数周、数月甚至更久,这将考验民主党保持团结的能力。

    据两名了解会议情况的人士透露,周二晚上的闭门会议上,杰弗里斯与约六位亲以色列民主党人会面,试图争取他们支持战争权力法案,过程中近一小时都在听取同僚的反对意见。

    但此次会议并未让这些成员承诺支持该法案。

    “这并没有改变我的想法。”参加会议的众议员格雷格·兰兹曼(Greg Landsman)告诉美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)。

    3月3日周二,众议员格雷格·兰兹曼(右)回答美国有线电视新闻网记者马努·拉朱(Manu Raju)的提问。
    美国有线电视新闻网

    几小时前,兰兹曼对政府对伊朗的初步打击表示了出人意料的支持,并誓言反对旨在限制总统未经国会批准使用武力的两党决议——他认为该决议可能会削弱美军在海外的行动能力。

    “我更倾向于‘国家优先’,所以在这种情况下,我认为对国家和我的选民(选区)最有利的就是国家安全。对我来说,这是显而易见的:他们有机会摧毁伊朗政权的特定军事资产,让我们更安全。”兰兹曼表示,但他补充说,如果伊朗冲突“超出当前目标”,国会应该拥有发言权。

    国会大厦另一端,费特曼的立场更为激进,他指责党内因“害怕”自由派基础而压制对特朗普行动的支持。

    “我们为什么不能都说‘世界更安全了’?”当被问及大多数民主党人对打击行动的反对时,费特曼对记者说,“为什么不能承认地球上最邪恶的人被消灭了?”

    然而,兰兹曼和费特曼的观点与包括国家安全民主党人在内的许多同僚形成鲜明对比。后者认为,特朗普的行动使国家安全大幅下降,而没有考虑到美军的代价。

    “如果我再听到一个从未在军营服役一天的‘鹰派’坐在华盛顿镀金办公室里或海湖庄园(Mar-a-Lago)里,空谈战争却从未经历过战争是什么样子,我会发疯的。”纽约州民主党众议员帕特·瑞安(Pat Ryan)怒吼道,他是一名曾两次被部署到伊拉克的战斗老兵。

    瑞安属于一群民主党人,他们大多40多岁,在美军25年驻伊阿期间(约1999-2024年)曾在伊拉克和阿富汗服役。温德曼称,他的双胞胎兄弟亚历克斯(Alex)曾在伊拉克被“伊朗制造的”炮弹在简易爆炸装置(IED)袭击中受伤。

    民主党领袖坚决否认费特曼关于他们向自由派基础“讨好”的指控。

    3月3日周二,参议员布莱恩·沙茨(Brian Schatz)和科里·布克(Cory Booker)与媒体成员交谈。
    联合报道

    夏威夷州民主党参议员布莱恩·沙茨警告同僚,在这场政治博弈中不要过度思考。

    “从地缘政治角度看,这是一个战略错误;从道德层面看,这值得质疑;从政治层面看,这极度不受欢迎。所以不要自作聪明。”他在谈到对战争权力法案持观望态度的民主党人时说道。

    但战争权力的斗争只是开始。民主党人是否应该在伊朗冲突中拥有更多发言权,这是一回事;而面对伊朗长期战事可能迫使他们就为美军提供补给等更大问题表态,这是完全不同的挑战。

    已有迹象表明,国会可能需要在未来几周或几个月内通过法案,提供更多资金和武器,至少要补充此次冲突中消耗的弹药。这一问题可能在中期选举前数月进一步加剧党内分歧。

    “我想确保我们的军人和地区内的美国公民得到尽可能的保护。”亚利桑那州民主党参议员、退伍军人马克·凯利(Mark Kelly)表示,“我们必须保护我们的部队,现在有很多人处于危险之中,所以我们会仔细审视他们的提议。”

    亚利桑那州民主党参议员鲁本·加列戈(Ruben Gallego)是一名曾在伊拉克服役的海军陆战队战斗老兵,他表示将仔细审查任何补充资金请求,但他认为这对议员尤其是退伍军人来说是个难题。周六早上看到伊朗袭击的消息时,他只有一个想法:“又来了。”

    “一方面,我希望确保我们的部队拥有所需的所有装备来保障安全;另一方面,在已经有1万亿美元预算、且又额外增加1750亿美元国土安全部预算的情况下,为一场‘选择性战争’花费500亿美元,这非常困难。”他说。

    (注:文中所有人物职务、事件时间及地点均严格按照原文信息翻译,未作调整。)

    They fought in Iraq. Now they’re the Democrats’ loudest voices against the war in Iran.

    By Lauren Fox, Sarah Ferris
    1 hr 31 min ago
    PUBLISHED Mar 5, 2026, 5:30 AM ET

    Rep. Eugene Vindman speaks in Washington, DC, on Wednesday.

    Bryan Dozier/NURPHO/AP

    Rep. Eugene Vindman is among a generation of young Democrats who ran for Congress, in part, because of their experience fighting a forever war in the Middle East.

    These Democrats are some of the earliest and most vocal critics of President Donald Trump’s decision to enter the US into war with Iran — a view that puts them at odds with some of the more interventionist members of their party.

    “I will not be shedding a tear for the Iranian regime and the Ayatollah. I understand the threat but I also understand that wars are easy to start and hard to finish,” Vindman, a 25-year Army veteran, said Wednesday morning outside the US Capitol, standing shoulder to shoulder with a half-dozen fellow Democratic veterans. “This is a commitment of American blood and treasure to a conflict that we didn’t need to be engaged in.”

    An F/A-18E Super Hornet aircraft, attached to Strike Fighter Squadron 37, lands on the flight deck of the Gerald R. Ford in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea on March 2.

    US Navy

    “When elites in Washington bang the war drums, pound their chest, talk about the costs of war and act tough, they’re not talking about them doing it,” added Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado, who served three tours in Iraq.

    Party leaders, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, are amplifying those voices as Democrats seek to navigate the fallout from the quickly escalating war. While Vindman and his fellow Democratic veterans know they have little chance of blocking Trump’s actions in the GOP-led Congress, they’re trying to speak to a skeptical American public – arguing that the Trump administration has betrayed a core promise with the midterms just months away.

    But it’s a difficult line for Democrats to walk. Party leaders are navigating sharp divisions within their ranks, particularly among a pro-Israel bloc that is expected to defy leadership in a key House vote on Thursday that will attempt to curb Trump’s military powers overseas. One Democrat, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, opposed a similar vote in the Senate on Wednesday – the only Democrat to do so.

    Sen. John Fetterman speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on Tuesday, March 3.

    Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters

    For now, most Democrats are firmly condemning Trump’s decision to strike Iran without first seeking congressional approval. But the party will also soon be forced to contend with the reality of supporting US troops in the conflict in Iran, including questions about whether to spend billions of dollars more to shore up US operations.

    Party leaders are eager not to repeat history and sow divisions that plagued them over the Iraq war more than 20 years ago. They also know it is just the beginning of a conflict that could go on for weeks, if not months or even longer, that will test Democrats’ ability to stay united.

    In a closed-door meeting Tuesday night, Jeffries met with a bloc of roughly a half-dozen pro-Israel Democrats to make his case for backing the war powers measure, spending nearly an hour hearing the opposition from his fellow members, according to two people familiar with the meeting

    But that meeting ended without a commitment from those members to get in line behind the measure.

    “It didn’t change my mind,” Rep. Greg Landsman, who was one of those who attended the meeting, told CNN.

    Rep. Greg Landsman, right, answers a question from CNN’s Manu Raju on Tuesday, March 3.

    CNN

    Hours earlier, Landsman offered a surprisingly supportive assessment of the administration’s initial strikes in Iran, and vowed to oppose the bipartisan resolution to curb the president’s use of force in the country absent congressional approval, which he said could hamstring the military’s work abroad.

    “I’m more of a country-first guy, so whatever I think is best for the country and for my constituents, for the district, in this case, national security. To me, this was a no brainer. They had a window of opportunity to take out very specific military assets in order to defang the Iranian regime. We will be safer as a result,” Landsman said, though adding that Congress should have a say if the Iranian conflict “goes beyond” its current aims.

    Across the Capitol, Fetterman has gone even further, accusing his party of silencing their support for Trump’s operation because they’re “afraid” of the base.

    “Why can’t we all just say, ‘The world is safer’?” Fetterman told reporters, when asked about most Democrats’ opposition of the strikes. “Why can’t you just acknowledge the most evil people on the face of the earth were erased?”

    The views of Landsman and Fetterman, however, contrast starkly from many of their colleagues, including the bloc of national security Democrats who have argued Trump’s move makes the country dramatically less safe without considering the costs to US troops.

    “If I hear one more chicken hawk who’s never served a single day in uniform sitting in a gold plated office in DC or Mar-a-lago or anywhere else, try to talk tough having never seen what war is about, I’m going to lose my mind,” New York Democrat Rep. Pat Ryan, a combat veteran who was deployed twice to Iraq.

    Ryan is among the group of Democrats, mostly in their 40s, who were deployed throughout Iraq and Afghanistan in the roughly 25 years that the US had troops there. Vindman, who deployed to Iraq, served as an infantry officer, paratrooper and as a military lawyer. His twin brother, Alex, was wounded in an IED attack in Iraq by an “Iranian manufactured” projectile, Vindman said Wednesday.

    Democratic leaders firmly dispute Fetterman’s accusations that they are pandering to a liberal base.

    Sen. Brian Schatz and Sen. Cory Booker speak with members of the media on Tuesday, March 3.

    Pool

    Sen. Brian Schatz, a Democrat from Hawaii, warned Democrats should be careful not to overthink the politics of this.

    “I think this is a strategic mistake in the geopolitical sense, I think it’s morally questionable and it’s politically incredibly unpopular, so don’t outsmart yourself,” he said generally about Democrats who are on the fence about the war powers resolution.

    But the fight over war powers is just the beginning. It is one thing for Democrats to stay united on a question of whether Congress should have more say over initiating a conflict with Iran in the first place, it is an entirely different question for Democrats to confront the reality that a prolonged battle in Iran may force them to contend with bigger questions over supplying US forces in the region.

    Already, there is a signal that Congress may need to pass legislation in the coming weeks or months to provide more funding and weapons to at the very least restock diminished ammunitions used in the conflict so far. That question could further divide Democrats just months before the midterm elections.

    “I want to make sure our service members and US citizens in the region are protected to the extent we could possibly do that,” Sen. Mark Kelly, a Democrat from Arizona and veteran said. “We gotta be able to protect our troops and there are a lot of people in harm’s way right now so we will take a close look at what they propose.”

    Arizona Democratic Sen. Ruben Gallego, a Marine Corps combat veteran who served in Iraq, said he will have to look at any supplemental funding request closely but contends it is a difficult question for lawmakers and veterans in particular. On Saturday morning when Gallego saw the news of the attack in Iran, he had one thought: “Here we go again.”

    “There is one side of me that wants to make sure that all the equipment our troops need to be protected is there, at the same time funding a war of choice for $50 billion when there is already a trillion dollar budget when they have already added another $175 billion to the DHS budget, it makes it very difficult,” he said.

  • 卡尼吁加澳携手合作 加强对抗霸权


    2026年3月5日 18:03 / 联合早报

    加拿大总理卡尼星期四在堪培拉向澳大利亚国会发表讲话,呼吁两国加强战略合作。 (路透社)

    (堪培拉综合电)加拿大总理卡尼星期四提出,加拿大与澳大利亚应成为战略伙伴而非竞争对手,两国携手合作将加强与包括美国在内的超级大国谈判的实力。

    卡尼星期四(3月5日)访问澳洲期间向澳洲国会发表演讲,这是自2007年以来加拿大领导人首次在澳洲国会发言。

    卡尼说,他此次来访是为了在全球架构因接连不断的危机而分崩离析之际,重申渥太华与堪培拉的同盟关系。他指出,加澳虽然在地理上相隔遥远,但理应成为“战略表亲”。

    他说:“在旧世界……我们倾向于把彼此视为竞争对手。在新世界,我们应该成为战略合作伙伴,在提升战略自主性的同时,加大投资、加快技术合作,增强供应链韧性,以及扩大国内加工能力。”

    卡尼说,在大国竞争的世界中,中等强国面临的选择是:要么争取大国青睐,要么联合起来增强实力。他认为,中等强国的当务之急是制定规范,并参与制定新规则,以共同应对日益被霸权大国主导的世界格局。

    他强调:“中等强国不能仅仅筑起更高的墙,并退到墙后。我们必须共同合作。”

    澳洲总理阿尔巴尼斯星期四在国会致辞时也说,卡尼来访反映了加澳在世界舞台上发挥更大作用的共同抱负。

    阿尔巴尼斯说:“澳洲和加拿大是正在变化的世界中的中等强国。我们无法逆转变革,但可以支持自己与我们的公民,同时互相支持。”

    卡尼指出,两国可以合作发展战略优势的领域包括关键矿物、人工智能(AI)、贸易,以及无人机和卫星等防御设备。

    他也宣布,加澳当天早些时候签订了一系列与关键矿产有关的新协议,包括澳洲加入七国集团(G7)矿产联盟。

    这个联盟由加拿大主导,是全球拥有主要矿产储备的民主国家组成的最大集团,旨在促进全球关键矿产的多样化,并保障生产和供应。加拿大和澳洲共生产全球约三分之一的锂和铀,以及超过40%的铁矿石。

    澳洲是卡尼亚太之行的第二站。他此前已访问印度,星期五(6日)离开澳洲后将续程前往日本。

    卡尼吁加澳携手合作 加强对抗霸权

    2026年3月5日 18:03 / 联合早报

    加拿大总理卡尼星期四在堪培拉向澳大利亚国会发表讲话,呼吁两国加强战略合作。 (路透社)

    (堪培拉综合电)加拿大总理卡尼星期四提出,加拿大与澳大利亚应成为战略伙伴而非竞争对手,两国携手合作将加强与包括美国在内的超级大国谈判的实力。

    卡尼星期四(3月5日)访问澳洲期间向澳洲国会发表演讲,这是自2007年以来加拿大领导人首次在澳洲国会发言。

    卡尼说,他此次来访是为了在全球架构因接连不断的危机而分崩离析之际,重申渥太华与堪培拉的同盟关系。他指出,加澳虽然在地理上相隔遥远,但理应成为“战略表亲”。

    他说:“在旧世界……我们倾向于把彼此视为竞争对手。在新世界,我们应该成为战略合作伙伴,在提升战略自主性的同时,加大投资、加快技术合作,增强供应链韧性,以及扩大国内加工能力。”

    卡尼说,在大国竞争的世界中,中等强国面临的选择是:要么争取大国青睐,要么联合起来增强实力。他认为,中等强国的当务之急是制定规范,并参与制定新规则,以共同应对日益被霸权大国主导的世界格局。

    他强调:“中等强国不能仅仅筑起更高的墙,并退到墙后。我们必须共同合作。”

    澳洲总理阿尔巴尼斯星期四在国会致辞时也说,卡尼来访反映了加澳在世界舞台上发挥更大作用的共同抱负。

    阿尔巴尼斯说:“澳洲和加拿大是正在变化的世界中的中等强国。我们无法逆转变革,但可以支持自己与我们的公民,同时互相支持。”

    卡尼指出,两国可以合作发展战略优势的领域包括关键矿物、人工智能(AI)、贸易,以及无人机和卫星等防御设备。

    他也宣布,加澳当天早些时候签订了一系列与关键矿产有关的新协议,包括澳洲加入七国集团(G7)矿产联盟。

    这个联盟由加拿大主导,是全球拥有主要矿产储备的民主国家组成的最大集团,旨在促进全球关键矿产的多样化,并保障生产和供应。加拿大和澳洲共生产全球约三分之一的锂和铀,以及超过40%的铁矿石。

    澳洲是卡尼亚太之行的第二站。他此前已访问印度,星期五(6日)离开澳洲后将续程前往日本。

  • 豪华专机、毛毯和莱万多夫斯基:诺姆第二天听证会几乎毫无想象空间 | 福克斯新闻


    美国国土安全部听证会召开之际,国会议员在如何全面资助该机构的问题上仍陷入僵局

    作者:布雷安妮·德皮施
    福克斯新闻

    发布时间:2026年3月5日 美国东部时间上午5:00

    诺姆在国会的第二天作证明显充满争议,有时甚至极具个人色彩。

    您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章了!

    收听本文

    6分钟

    国土安全部部长克里斯蒂·诺姆周三在民主党议员面前有力地捍卫了她所在部门的移民执法政策——这是一场激烈且充满争议的众议院监督委员会听证会的一部分,听证会有时变得极具个人色彩。

    这场听证会是连续两天围绕国土安全部移民执法行动和诺姆领导部门的监督听证会的第二天,此时国会议员在如何为这个庞大的联邦机构提供全面资金支持的问题上仍陷入僵局。

    以下是这场内容丰富的听证会的重要时刻。

    民主党聚焦莱万多夫斯基、“毛毯”和豪华专机

    小组中的一些民主党人将矛头指向科里·莱万多夫斯基作为国土安全部特别顾问所承担的职责。加利福尼亚州民主党众议员西德尼·卡尔马杰-多夫引用了上个月《华尔街日报》的一篇报道,称唐纳德·特朗普总统据称拒绝了莱万多夫斯基担任诺姆幕僚长的请求,“原因是两人之间存在恋爱关系的报道”。

    诺姆和莱万多夫斯基都否认了有关恋情的报道。

    卡尔马杰-多夫直截了当地问诺姆他们关系的性质。“这个人几乎没有管理任何接近国土安全部的机构,甚至没有为像您这样职位的人提供建议的经验,”卡尔马杰-多夫说,指出他作为特别政府雇员的任期已经“远远超过了允许的130天”。

    “他不称职,这让我的选民和我想知道为什么他是您的最高官员,”她补充道。

    “那么,诺姆部长,在您担任国土安全部主任期间,您是否曾与科里·莱万多夫斯基发生过性关系?”

    诺姆转向众议院司法委员会主席吉姆·乔丹简短回应后,才回答了这个问题。“主席先生,我很震惊我们今天在这个委员会里竟然在传播小报垃圾,”她说。

    她对卡尔马杰-多夫说:“女士,我要告诉您的一件事是,他是一名为白宫工作的特别政府雇员。联邦政府中有数千名这样的人。”

    拉斯金称诺姆“飞得太靠近太阳”

    小组的民主党高级成员、马里兰州众议员杰米·拉斯金向诺姆追问莱万多夫斯基在国土安全部的角色细节,但这是在国土安全部使用所谓“豪华专机”的问题背景下。诺姆在前一天的参议院听证会上为使用这些专机进行了辩护,指出它们既用于行政旅行,也用于大规模驱逐。

    拉斯金周三表示,他差点就相信了那个说法。“然后我听说了一场关于特权、傲慢和蔑视的空中事件,我简直不敢相信。”

    “显然,当你的特殊毛毯——你的‘毯子’——被留在其中一架政府专机上而没有被运到新飞机上时,你的特别政府雇员科里·莱万多夫斯基挺身而出,在空中解雇了飞行员,”拉斯金说。

    “一名2003年海岸警卫队学院毕业生和杰出的美国海岸警卫队指挥官……然后他必须立即被重新雇佣,因为没有其他人能在剩下的归途中驾驶你们两人,”拉斯金说。“诺姆部长,你现在飞得很高,也许甚至有点太靠近太阳了。”

    双方的交流明显紧张,很大程度上是因为诺姆的丈夫全程坐在旁听席上。

    斯瓦尔韦尔与诺姆的对峙

    听证会后期,加利福尼亚州民主党众议员埃里克·斯瓦尔韦尔就米格尔·洛佩斯的案件质问诺姆。洛佩斯是一名在美国非法居住约30年的移民,去年被驱逐出境。洛佩斯已婚,妻子是美国居民。“我去墨西哥见了米格尔,”斯瓦尔韦尔告诉诺姆。“他没有工作……而且他离开祖国大约30年后,沟通变得很困难。”

    诺姆打断道:“他有犯罪记录吗?”

    斯瓦尔韦尔承认洛佩斯在1995年曾因“较轻的非暴力指控”认罪,但要求诺姆认识到政府更广泛的驱逐政策造成的“痛苦”。

    “痛苦?”诺姆回应道。“我希望人们能正确行事。如果他们在美国没有合法身份,他们可以回国。我们会支付他们回国的费用。”

    至于洛佩斯,她说:“我希望他通过选择自愿遣返能得到他本可以得到的2600美元。”

    “最恶劣的罪犯”

    最激烈的交锋发生在田纳西州民主党众议员史蒂夫·科恩追问诺姆特朗普政府在驱逐行动中反复承诺打击“最恶劣罪犯”的问题时。

    “告诉我关于‘最恶劣罪犯’的情况,”科恩说。

    诺姆反驳道:“最恶劣的罪犯已经被处理了。我认为你今天冒犯了我身后的家庭。”

    科恩回应称,他无意冒犯任何人,并表示诺姆暗示他这样做是错误的。但诺姆加倍坚持,辩称批评者在淡化非法移民的后果。

    “我在评论这样一个事实,即这些人不是暴力罪犯,而你一直在谈论这些非法进入美国的人不会伤害家庭,”她说。

    科恩指出,根据统计数据,非法移民“比在美国出生的人更不可能犯罪”。

    诺姆随即指向坐在她身后的家庭成员,援引了因芬太尼过量和非法移民司机致命车祸而失去孩子的故事。

    “我身后的绝大多数人都因为毒品而失去了他们的孩子,这些毒品是从南部边境运来的,”诺姆说。“他们死于孩子被毒品过量、非法司机造成的致命车祸。”

    科恩承认这些悲剧,但认为它们与他的更广泛观点无关。“这一切都是真的,而且确实如此,”他说。“但你说你只针对‘最恶劣的罪犯’,但你没有。”

    相关文章:“你应该感到羞耻!”:抗议者在克里斯蒂·诺姆的参议院听证会上被拖走

    布雷安妮·德皮施是福克斯新闻数字版的国家政治记者,报道特朗普政府,重点关注司法部、联邦调查局和其他国家新闻。她曾在《华盛顿 examiner》和《华盛顿邮报》报道国家政治,还在《政治杂志》、《科罗拉多公报》等媒体发表过文章。您可以通过 Breanne.Deppisch@fox.com 向布雷安妮提供线索,或在 X 平台上关注她 @breanne_dep。

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6390394755112

    Luxe jets, blankies, Lewandowski: Noem’s Day 2 hearing left little to imagination | Fox News

    The DHS hearing comes as members of Congress remain deadlocked on how to fully fund the agency

    By Breanne Deppisch
    Fox News

    Published March 5, 2026 5:00am EST

    Noem’s second day of congressional testimony was markedly contentious, and at times, deeply personal.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Listen to this article

    6 min

    Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem forcefully defended her department’s immigration enforcement policies Wednesday before Democratic lawmakers — part of a heated and contentious House Oversight Committee hearing that, at times, grew deeply personal.

    The hearing is the second in back-to-back DHS oversight hearings centered on the agency’s actions on immigration enforcement and Noem’s leadership of the department, and comes as members of Congress remain deadlocked on how to proceed with fully funding the sprawling federal agency.

    Here are the top moments from the action-packed hearing.

    Dems home in on Lewandowski, ‘blankies’ and luxury jets

    Some Democrats on the panel zeroed in on the responsibilities Corey Lewandowski has assumed as a special adviser for the Department of Homeland Security. Rep. Sydney Kalmager-Dove, D-Calif., cited a Wall Street Journal report from last month, that said President Donald Trump allegedly rejected Lewandowski’s request to be Noem’s chief of staff “due to reports of a romantic relationship” between the two.

    Both Noem and Lewandowski have denied reports of an affair.

    Kalmager-Dove asked Noem, point-blank, about the nature of their relationship. “This person has no experience running anything close to the Department of Homeland Security, or even advising someone in your position,” Kalmager-Dove said, noting his role as a special government employee has extended a “well beyond the allowed 130-day” period.

    U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem takes her seat as she arrives to testify during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.(AFP via Getty)

    “He is unqualified, which has left my constituents and I wondering why he is your top official,” she added.

    “So, Secretary Noem, at any time during your tenure as Director of Department of Homeland Security, have you had sexual relations with Corey Lewandowski?”

    Noem turned to address House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan briefly before responding. “Mr. Chairman, I am shocked that we’re going down and peddling tabloid garbage in this committee today,” she said.

    To Kalmager-Dove, she said: “Ma’am, one thing that I would tell you is that he is a special government employee who works for the White House. There are thousands of them in the federal government.”

    Corey Lewandowski is seen before a House Intelligence Committee hearing.(Reuters/Jonathan Ernst)

    Raskin says Noem is ‘flying too close to the sun’

    The panel’s ranking Democrat, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., pressed Noem for details about Lewandowski’s role at DHS, though in the context of the question of DHS’s use of so-called “luxury jets.” Noem had defended use of the jets one day prior during Senate testimony, noting they were used for both executive travel and mass deportations.

    Raskin said Wednesday that he had nearly been prepared to buy that story. “And then I heard about an airborne episode of entitlement, arrogance and contempt that I could hardly believe.”

    “Apparently, when your special blanket — your blankie — was left on one of the government jets and not transported over the new one, your special government employee, Corey Lewandowski, chivalrous, stepped forward to fire the pilot, mid-air,” Raskin said.

    “A 2003 Coast Guard Academy graduate and distinguished U.S. Coast Guard commander … [who then] had to be rehired immediately because there was no one else who could fly the two of you on the rest of the journey back home,” Raskin said. “Secretary Noem, you’re flying high now, maybe even a little bit too close to the sun.”

    The exchanges were markedly tense, largely due to the presence of Noem’s husband, who was sitting in the gallery for the duration of the hearing.

    DHS SECRETARY KRISTI NOEM ADDRESSES CALLS FOR HER FIRING, NEW ALEX PRETTI VIDEO

    DHS Secretary Kristi Noem testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee.(Getty Images)

    Swalwell, Noem showdown

    Later in the hearing, Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., confronted Noem about the case of Miguel Lopez, a migrant who had been living illegally in the U.S. for some 30 years prior to his deportation last year. Lopez is married to a U.S. resident. “I went and saw Miguel in Mexico,” Swalwell told Noem. “He doesn’t have a job … and it’s hard for him to communicate” after being away from his home country for roughly three decades.

    Noemi interjected: “Did he have a criminal record?”

    Swalwell acknowledged that Lopez had pleaded guilty to a “lesser nonviolent charge” in 1995, but asked Noem to recognize “the pain” caused by the administration’s broader deportation policy.

    “The pain?” Noem responded. “And I wish people would do things correctly. If they’re not in legal status in this country, they can return home. We will pay for them to return home.”

    As for Lopez, she said, “I hope he got the $2,600 he could have” by choosing to self-deport.

    Federal agents forcibly detain an anti-ICE protester outside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement building on Oct. 12, 2025, in Portland, Oregon.(Mathieu Lewis-Rolland/Getty)

    ‘Worst of the Worst’

    The sharpest exchange came when Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., pressed Noem on the Trump administration’s repeated pledge to target “the worst of the worst” offenders in its removal efforts.

    “Tell me about the worst of the worst,” Cohen said.

    Noem fired back: “The worst of the worst served. I think you’ve offended the families behind me today with that.”

    GOP STATES MOVE TO MAKE CHURCH SERVICE DISRUPTIONS A FELONY AFTER MINNESOTA STORMING

    Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, left, and White House border czar Tom Homan speak with reporters at the White House, Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2025, in Washington.(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

    Cohen responded that he did not intend to offend anyone and said it was wrong for Noem to suggest he had. But Noem doubled down, arguing that critics were downplaying the consequences of illegal immigration.

    “I was commenting on the fact that the individuals aren’t violent offenders, and you keep talking about the fact that these individuals that are in this country illegally don’t harm families,” she said.

    Cohen noted that undocumented immigrants are statistically “less likely” than people born in the U.S. to commit crimes.

    Noem then gestured to family members seated behind her, invoking stories of children lost to fentanyl overdoses and fatal car crashes involving undocumented drivers.

    “The vast majority of these people behind me lost their children due to drugs, overdoses from drugs that came over the southern border,” Noem said. “They died from their kids being hit, accidents on the roads that illegal drivers were driving.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Cohen acknowledged the tragedies but argued they did not address his broader point. “All that’s true and given it’s true,” he said. “But you say you’re only going after the worst of the worst, and you’re not.”

    Related Article

    ‘You should be ashamed!’: Protester dragged from Kristi Noem’s Senate hearing

    Breanne Deppisch is a national politics reporter for Fox News Digital covering the Trump administration, with a focus on the Justice Department, FBI and other national news. She previously covered national politics at the Washington Examiner and The Washington Post, with additional bylines in Politico Magazine, the Colorado Gazette and others. You can send tips to Breanne at Breanne.Deppisch@fox.com, or follow her on X at @breanne_dep.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6390394755112

  • 众议院将在与伊朗战争之际,因共和党强调紧迫性,就结束国土安全部停摆问题再次投票


    2026年3月5日 / 美国东部时间上午6:00 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    华盛顿 — 众议院将于周四再次就资助美国国土安全部(DHS)的法案进行投票,共和党人强调在与伊朗的战争背景下结束部分政府停摆的紧迫性。

    共和党人向民主党施压,要求其支持今年早些时候拨款委员会以两党合作方式达成的一项协议,该协议将资助国土安全部至9月。但这是在1月份联邦探员在明尼阿波利斯第二次致命枪击事件发生之前,这一事件促使民主党人要求在移民执法改革前,不向该部门提供任何资金。

    路易斯安那州共和党人、众议院议长迈克·约翰逊周二在一份声明中表示:“伊朗的军事行动使得拥有一支人员充足、资金全面的国土安全部各部门变得更加紧迫和关键。”

    周三,约翰逊指责民主党人“玩弄政治游戏”,并称有人投票反对资助国土安全部是“可耻的”。

    “如果我们明智的话,现在是时候在家中保持警惕,并确保所有‘门’都锁好,”约翰逊表示。“显然,每个人都明白这是一个威胁加剧的环境。全球紧张局势高企,威胁不断演变,美国的对手正在密切关注我们是否有任何软弱的迹象。”

    路易斯安那州共和党人、众议院多数党领袖史蒂夫·斯卡利斯周三也呼应称,在美国对伊朗发动袭击后,美国国内安全担忧加剧,继续停摆是“危险的”。

    “既然我们面临高度威胁,这不再是假设性的威胁……我们需要比以往任何时候都更加警惕,并拥有一个具备全部能力的运作正常的国土安全部,”斯卡利斯指出,上周末得克萨斯州奥斯汀一家酒吧发生致命枪击事件,以此为例。

    2月14日,国土安全部的资金拨款到期,民主党人和白宫在对联邦移民探员的限制问题上仍存在分歧。双方一直在来回提出反建议,但具体细节尚未公开。据参议院少数党领袖、纽约州民主党人查克·舒默称,双方“仍相距甚远”。

    “但我们仍在谈判并来回交换书面文件,”舒默周二表示。

    上周,参议院第二次未能推进一项资助国土安全部至9月的法案。

    自1月份联邦探员在明尼苏达州击毙蕾妮·古德和亚历克斯·普雷蒂以来,民主党人一直坚定要求改革,包括要求移民探员佩戴随身摄像机和身份标识,禁止佩戴口罩,并强制要求在私人财产上进行逮捕时必须有司法令状。

    尽管僵局主要围绕移民海关执法局(ICE)和海关与边境保护局(CBP),但国土安全部还监督运输安全管理局(TSA)、海岸警卫队和联邦紧急事务管理局(FEMA)。在停摆期间继续工作的员工最近几天开始领不到工资。

    特朗普政府的移民执法行动在停摆期间仍获得资助,这要归功于去年夏天议员们通过的一项数十亿美元的现金注入,用于移民海关执法局和海关与边境保护局,作为《超级大美丽法案》(One Big Beautiful Bill Act)的一部分。

    当被问及民主党人对众议院共和党人在伊朗打击后资助国土安全部策略的回应时,众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯称“整件事都疯了”。

    “唐纳德·特朗普在中东发动未经授权的战争,他称这场战争将持续不断,他决定要花费数十亿美元轰炸伊朗,而不是用纳税人的钱降低正使美国民众不堪重负的食品杂货账单,然后还想用他这场未经授权的战争作为借口,继续用纳税人的钱通过无限制地发动移民海关执法局来欺凌或杀害美国公民,”这位纽约州民主党人周二在新闻发布会上表示。“这说得通吗?因为显然说不通。”

    House to vote again on ending DHS shutdown after weekslong impasse, with GOP stressing urgency amid Iran war

    March 5, 2026 / 6:00 AM EST / CBS News

    Washington — The House will vote again on Thursday on legislation to fund the Department of Homeland Security, as Republicans stress an urgency to ending the partial government shutdown amid the war with Iran.

    Republicans have put pressure on Democrats to support an agreement that appropriators reached on a bipartisan basis earlier this year to fund DHS through September. But that was before a second fatal shooting by federal agents in Minneapolis in January, which prompted Democrats to oppose any funding for the department without reforms to immigration enforcement.

    House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, said in a statement Tuesday that “military action in Iran makes it all the more urgent and crucial to have a fully staffed, fully funded Department of Homeland Security across all departments.”

    On Wednesday, Johnson accused Democrats of “playing political games” and called it “shameful” that anyone would vote against funding DHS.

    “If we’re being wise, now is the time to be vigilant at home and to ensure that all of our doors are locked, so to speak,” Johnson said. “Obviously everyone understands that it’s a heightened threat environment. Global tensions are high, threats are constantly evolving and America’s adversaries are watching for any sign of weakness on our part.”

    House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, a Louisiana Republican, echoed Wednesday that it’s “dangerous” to continue the shutdown amid heightened security concerns in the U.S. in wake of the attack on Iran.

    “Now that we’re at a heightened threat, it’s not just hypothetical threats … we need to be more vigilant than ever and have a fully functioning Department of Homeland Security with all the capabilities,” Scalise said, pointing to a deadly shooting at a bar in Austin, Texas, over the weekend.

    Funding lapsed for the department on Feb. 14, and Democrats and the White House continue to remain at odds on restraints for federal immigration agents. Both sides have been going back and forth with counterproposals, though the details have not been made public. According to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York

    Democrat, both sides are “still far apart.”

    “But we’re still negotiating and exchanging paper back and forth,” Schumer said Tuesday.

    Last week, the Senate failed for a second time to advance a measure to fund DHS through September.

    Since federal agents fatally shot Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minnesota in January, Democrats have remained firm in their demands for reforms, which include requiring immigration agents to wear body cameras and identification, banning them from wearing masks and mandating judicial warrants for arrests on private property.

    Though the standoff has centered on Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection, DHS also oversees the Transportation Security Administration, the Coast Guard and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Workers who have continued to do their jobs during the shutdown have begun missing paychecks in recent days.

    The Trump administration’s immigration enforcement campaign has remained funded despite the shutdown, thanks to a multibillion-dollar cash infusion for ICE and CBP that lawmakers passed last summer as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

    House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who was asked about Democrats’ response to the House GOP strategy for funding DHS in the wake of the strikes on Iran, said, “the whole thing is insane.”

    “Donald Trump launches an unauthorized war in the Middle East, he characterizes it as endless, he decides that he wants to spend billions of dollars to bomb Iran, rather than spend taxpayer dollars to lower the grocery bills that are crushing the American people, and then wants to use his unauthorized war as an excuse to continue spending taxpayer dollars to brutalize or kill American citizens by continuing to unleash ICE without restriction on the American people,” the New York Democrat said at a news conference Tuesday. “Make it make sense, because it does not.”

  • 特朗普盟友扩大参与美国250周年庆典策划


    2026-03-05T10:00:38.177Z / 《华盛顿邮报》

    由特朗普支持的”自由250″组织的出现,与两党委员会引发紧张局势,并招致民主党人的质疑。

    美国东部时间2026年3月5日上午5点 美国东部时间今日上午5点

    7分钟阅读

    50

    1月1日,纪念美国250周年的影像被投射到华盛顿纪念碑上。(Peter W. Stevenson/《华盛顿邮报》)

    作者:丹·戴蒙德、卡特·扎克斯基和艾米丽·戴维斯

    两个团体——一个得到国会认可,另一个获得总统唐纳德·特朗普的支持——正在争夺主办美国250周年庆典的资格,这引发了混乱、信息混乱,以及民主党人的新质疑,他们质问为何与特朗普结盟的团体能获得联邦资金。

    Trump allies expand role in planning America’s 250th anniversary

    2026-03-05T10:00:38.177Z / The Washington Post

    The emergence of the Trump-backed Freedom 250 sparks tensions with a bipartisan commission and draws questions from Democrats.

    March 5, 2026 at 5:00 a.m. EST Today at 5:00 a.m. EST

    7 min

    50

    Images marking America’s 250th year are projected onto the Washington Monument on Jan. 1. (Peter W. Stevenson/The Washington Post)

    By Dan Diamond

    ,

    Cat Zakrzewski

    and

    Emily Davies

    Two groups — one with the imprimatur of Congress, the other with President Donald Trump’s blessing — are jockeying to host celebrations marking America’s 250th anniversary, sparking confusion, muddled messages and new scrutiny from Democrats who ask why the Trump-aligned group is receiving federal money.

  • 新闻


    卡塔尔首都与巴林首都响起爆炸声

    发布时间 / 来源:2026年3月5日 18:17 / 联合早报

    卡塔尔首都多哈上空响起巨大爆炸声。图为3月4日,多哈的滨海大道地区。 (法新社)

    卡塔尔首都多哈上空响起巨大爆炸声。就在几个小时前,官员们宣布正在疏散居住在美国大使馆附近的居民。

    为报复美国和以色列的大规模空袭行动,伊朗对波斯湾国家发动了多轮无人机和导弹袭击。

    法新社驻多哈(Doha)记者称,星期四(3月5日)的爆炸是自伊朗星期六开始袭击卡塔尔这个波斯湾国家以来最猛烈的袭击之一。多哈地平线上升起了一股黑烟。

    就在卡塔尔遭到袭击的几个小时前,卡塔尔首相在与伊朗外长通话时严厉抨击了伊朗。这是自伊朗发动导弹和无人机袭击以来,两国之间的首次高级别接触。

    卡塔尔外交部发表声明称,卡塔尔首相穆罕默德在与伊朗外长阿拉格齐的通话中指责伊朗企图“伤害其邻国,并将它们拖入一场与它们无关的战争”。

    星期四,巴林首都麦纳麦(Manama)也传出爆炸声。

    邻国沙特阿拉伯官员称,他们拦截了三枚巡航导弹和数架无人机。沙特国防部在X网站上发布消息称:“三枚巡航导弹在哈尔吉市附近被拦截并摧毁。”

    另据英国海上贸易行动办公室(UKMTO)通报,一艘油轮在科威特附近海域发生“剧烈爆炸”,造成漏油。

    伊朗精锐部队革命卫队声称已“完全控制”霍尔木兹海峡(Strait of Hormuz)。霍尔木兹海峡是连接波斯湾和印度洋的关键咽喉要道,也是世界上最重要的能源运输通道之一。

    据伊朗媒体报道,伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队星期四说,在战争时期,伊朗有权控制霍尔木兹海峡的通行和航行,美国、以色列和欧洲国家船只禁止通行。

    新华社引述伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队说,属于美国、以色列、欧洲国家及其支持者的军用和商用船只等禁止通过霍尔木兹海峡,“如果被伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队发现,必将遭到打击”。

    卡塔尔首都与巴林首都响起爆炸声

    发布时间 / 来源:2026年3月5日 18:17 / 联合早报

    卡塔尔首都多哈上空响起巨大爆炸声。图为3月4日,多哈的滨海大道地区。 (法新社)

    卡塔尔首都多哈上空响起巨大爆炸声。就在几个小时前,官员们宣布正在疏散居住在美国大使馆附近的居民。

    为报复美国和以色列的大规模空袭行动,伊朗对波斯湾国家发动了多轮无人机和导弹袭击。

    法新社驻多哈(Doha)记者称,星期四(3月5日)的爆炸是自伊朗星期六开始袭击卡塔尔这个波斯湾国家以来最猛烈的袭击之一。多哈地平线上升起了一股黑烟。

    就在卡塔尔遭到袭击的几个小时前,卡塔尔首相在与伊朗外长通话时严厉抨击了伊朗。这是自伊朗发动导弹和无人机袭击以来,两国之间的首次高级别接触。

    卡塔尔外交部发表声明称,卡塔尔首相穆罕默德在与伊朗外长阿拉格齐的通话中指责伊朗企图“伤害其邻国,并将它们拖入一场与它们无关的战争”。

    星期四,巴林首都麦纳麦(Manama)也传出爆炸声。

    邻国沙特阿拉伯官员称,他们拦截了三枚巡航导弹和数架无人机。沙特国防部在X网站上发布消息称:“三枚巡航导弹在哈尔吉市附近被拦截并摧毁。”

    另据英国海上贸易行动办公室(UKMTO)通报,一艘油轮在科威特附近海域发生“剧烈爆炸”,造成漏油。

    伊朗精锐部队革命卫队声称已“完全控制”霍尔木兹海峡(Strait of Hormuz)。霍尔木兹海峡是连接波斯湾和印度洋的关键咽喉要道,也是世界上最重要的能源运输通道之一。

    据伊朗媒体报道,伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队星期四说,在战争时期,伊朗有权控制霍尔木兹海峡的通行和航行,美国、以色列和欧洲国家船只禁止通行。

    新华社引述伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队说,属于美国、以色列、欧洲国家及其支持者的军用和商用船只等禁止通过霍尔木兹海峡,“如果被伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队发现,必将遭到打击”。

湘ICP备2026001899号-2