分类: 未分类

  • 伊朗外长与巴基斯坦总理会谈 重申伊朗停火原则


    2026年4月25日 23:00 / 联合早报

    伊朗外长与巴基斯坦总理会谈 重申伊朗停火原则

    4月25日,巴基斯坦总理谢里夫(左)在伊斯兰堡总理府与伊朗外长阿拉格齐(右二)会晤。 (法新社)

    伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐在巴基斯坦首都伊斯兰堡与巴基斯坦总理谢里夫举行会谈,再次阐明伊朗有关停火和彻底结束战事的原则立场。

    伊朗外交部星期六(4月25日)在社交媒体上发表声明说,双方讨论了各领域双边关系与合作以及地区和国际形势。阿拉格齐赞赏巴基斯坦为结束战争、促成停火所作辛勤努力,强调巴基斯坦在伊朗外交政策和关系中的特殊地位,并表示将进一步发展两国关系。

    新华社引述声明说,阿拉格齐还提及以色列在巴勒斯坦犯下的罪行以及对黎巴嫩领土和国家主权的侵犯。他赞赏巴基斯坦支持巴勒斯坦人民的立场,以及为落实黎以停火所作努力。

    谢里夫说,两国将继续加强双边关系,在多边层面和国际组织中加强协调与合作。

    4月25日,巴基斯坦总理谢里夫(左)在伊斯兰堡总理府与伊朗外长阿拉格齐(右二)会晤。 (法新社)

    伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐在巴基斯坦首都伊斯兰堡与巴基斯坦总理谢里夫举行会谈,再次阐明伊朗有关停火和彻底结束战事的原则立场。

    伊朗外交部星期六(4月25日)在社交媒体上发表声明说,双方讨论了各领域双边关系与合作以及地区和国际形势。阿拉格齐赞赏巴基斯坦为结束战争、促成停火所作辛勤努力,强调巴基斯坦在伊朗外交政策和关系中的特殊地位,并表示将进一步发展两国关系。

    新华社引述声明说,阿拉格齐还提及以色列在巴勒斯坦犯下的罪行以及对黎巴嫩领土和国家主权的侵犯。他赞赏巴基斯坦支持巴勒斯坦人民的立场,以及为落实黎以停火所作努力。

    谢里夫说,两国将继续加强双边关系,在多边层面和国际组织中加强协调与合作。

  • 美军称东太平洋打击疑似运毒船造成2人死亡


    2026年4月25日 / 美国东部时间上午8:53 / 哥伦比亚广播公司/美联社报道

    据美国南方司令部消息,美军周五对东太平洋一艘被指控贩运毒品的船只发动打击,造成2人死亡。

    美军在周五深夜发布于X平台的一份声明中表示,行动中无美军人员伤亡。

    美国南方司令部分享了一段视频,画面显示一艘船只在水面漂浮,随后发生爆炸并起火。该司令部称,他们在已知的走私路线上打击了涉嫌贩毒的人员。

    自去年9月以来,特朗普政府在拉美水域炸毁疑似运毒船只的行动已造成至少183人死亡。其他打击行动也曾在加勒比海展开。美军尚未提供证据证明这些船只确实载有毒品。

    此次袭击行动发生在美国数十年来在该地区部署最大规模军事力量之际,也距离今年1月抓捕时任委内瑞拉总统尼古拉斯·马杜罗的突袭行动仅数月。马杜罗被带到纽约面临贩毒指控,目前已拒不认罪。

    特朗普总统曾表示,美国与拉美贩毒集团处于“武装冲突”状态,并将此类打击行动辩解为遏制毒品流入美国的必要升级举措。

    批评人士对这类船只打击行动的整体合法性提出了质疑。

    U.S. strike on alleged drug boat kills 2 in eastern Pacific, military says

    April 25, 2026 / 8:53 AM EDT / CBS/AP

    The U.S. military launched a strike Friday on a boat accused of ferrying drugs in the eastern Pacific Ocean, killing two people, according to U.S. Southern Command.

    No U.S. military forces were harmed in the operation, it said in a statement on X late Friday.

    U.S. Southern Command shared a video showing a boat floating in the water before an explosion left it in flames. It said it targeted the alleged drug traffickers along known smuggling routes.

    The Trump administration’s campaign of blowing up alleged drug-trafficking vessels in Latin American waters has killed at least 183 people in total since September. Other strikes have taken place in the Caribbean Sea. The military has not provided evidence that any of the vessels were carrying drugs.

    The attacks began as the U.S. built up its largest military presence in the region in generations and came months ahead of the raid in January that captured then-Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. He was brought to New York to face drug trafficking charges and has pleaded not guilty.

    President Trump has said the U.S. is in “armed conflict” with cartels in Latin America and has justified the attacks as a necessary escalation to stem the flow of drugs into the U.S.

    Critics have questioned the overall legality of the boat strikes.

  • 众议院共和党人反对参议院“精简版”计划以结束创纪录的国土安全部停摆


    2026年4月25日 美国东部时间上午8:00 / 福克斯新闻频道

    部分共和党人希望在后续预算法案中纳入国防拨款、开支削减与生活成本相关措施
    亚当·帕克、亚历克斯·米勒 福克斯新闻报道

    【新增】您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章播报!

    参议院共和党人正在推进一项分两步走的计划,以结束创纪录的美国国土安全部(DHS)停摆,但众议院共和党同僚告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,他们并不支持这一策略。

    众多众议院共和党人愈发感到不满:即将推出的纯共和党拨款法案,除了在11月中期选举前为移民执法提供资金外,并未纳入其他政策优先事项。

    “我认为我们还有最后一次和解的机会,”北卡罗来纳州共和党众议员帕特·哈里斯根在接受福克斯新闻数字频道采访时表示,“我知道有些人说有两次机会,但我觉得我们只有一次板上钉钉的机会。”

    “我倾向于把法案规模做大,”他补充道,并提到了国防拨款和负担能力方面的担忧,“我们有很多重要事务要推进,必须把它们落实到位。”

    北卡罗来纳州共和党众议员帕特·哈里斯根主张扩大预算和解法案的范围,纳入国防拨款和生活成本相关的优先事项,但他告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,最终将尊重众议院共和党领导层的指导。

    移民海关执法局停摆之争或限制联邦紧急事务管理局、海岸警卫队仅能应对“危及生命”的紧急情况

    “我尚未下定决心,”众议院自由核心小组成员、路易斯安那州共和党众议员克莱·希金斯告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,他指的是参议院的做法,“我对此存在疑虑。我们认为法案应该更全面。”

    参议院周四早些时候几乎全党派投票通过了一项预算决议,将在唐纳德·特朗普总统剩余任期内为美国移民海关执法局(ICE)和美国海关与边境保护局(CBP)提供资金。

    此前参议院少数党领袖、纽约州民主党众议员查克·舒默拒绝在提案中加入全面改革的情况下为该部门提供资金,因此共和党正通过党派预算和解程序绕过民主党,仅依靠共和党议员的投票为移民执法提供资金。

    众议院议长、路易斯安那州共和党众议员迈克·约翰逊正力争最早于下周通过参议院的预算决议,届时他仅能承受寥寥数票的反对。唐纳德·特朗普总统已设定6月1日的最后期限,要求通过纯共和党法案全面为移民执法提供资金,迫使共和党人迅速行动,容不得半点差错。

    在国土安全部停摆之前,众议院共和党领导层曾透露,将推出《一个宏大美好法案》的预算和解续集,纳入一系列多样化的优先事项,例如国防补充拨款、针对欺诈行为的开支削减以及旨在降低生活成本的政策。

    普通共和党议员担忧即将出台的预算法案不会包含这些条款,这有可能危及这一时间表。

    保守派众议院自由核心小组的成员已对参议院为移民执法提供资金的“精简版”预算和解法案表示不满。(安德鲁·哈尼克/盖蒂图片社)

    众议院保守派还强烈反对参议院通过一项两党合作的部分国土安全部拨款法案,该法案将移民海关执法局和边境巡逻队从正常拨款程序中剥离,使这两个机构无法获得资金。

    在参议院民主党人多次阻挠国土安全部拨款法案后,参议院通过了一项立法,为民主党人会支持的部分国土安全部部门提供资金。众议院尚未审议该法案。

    “参议院送交的法案完全无法被保守派接受,”众议院自由核心小组主席、马里兰州共和党众议员安迪·哈里斯周四在谈及参议院的部分国土安全部法案时表示,“我们绝不会以任何方式投票支持为移民执法拨款为零的法案,”他补充道。

    “需要通过和解法案为移民海关执法局和边境保护局提供资金,这一前提令我反感,”希金斯告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,“这种事在国会山从未有过,拿出一项拨款法案,挑挑拣拣剔除你不想要的内容,孤立整个机构……我反对这整个前提。”

    国会最后一刻匆忙为国土安全部拨款的幕后细节

    【图片说明】国土安全部本周警告称,其资金不足,无法继续支付员工薪资至5月。(希瑟·迪尔/盖蒂图片社)

    参议院共和党人基本一致支持将法案范围收窄,担心添加更多内容可能会阻碍议员们的推进进度。

    参议院预算委员会主席、南卡罗来纳州共和党众议员林赛·格雷厄姆试图加快后续预算法案的通过流程,仅邀请参议院司法委员会和参议院国土安全与政府事务委员会两个委员会参与该程序。

    “绝大多数共和党人团结一致,做成了民主党人拒绝配合的事:在特朗普总统任期内,为边境巡逻队和移民海关执法局提供三年半的全额资金,”格雷厄姆在上议院通过预算蓝图后于周四表示,“作为参议院预算委员会主席,我为我的同僚们感到非常自豪。”

    尽管如此,一些参议院共和党人同意众议院同僚的观点,希望扩大后续法案的规模,因为他们担心在中期选举前不会再有第二次机会。

    路易斯安那州共和党参议员约翰·肯尼迪认为,尽管领导层承诺今年晚些时候可能会推出第三项和解法案,但共和党人仍应尝试扩大法案规模。

    “我不是说有人在撒谎,他们没有。人们可能确实打算推出第三项和解法案,”肯尼迪在参议院议场说道,“但你面前的可不是小鹿斑比的弟弟,不会有第三项和解法案的。你清楚这点……我也清楚。这就是最后机会了。这是离开车站的末班车。”

    【图片说明】路易斯安那州共和党参议员约翰·肯尼迪辩称,今年不太可能推出第三项预算和解法案,并补充道,即将出台的以移民执法为重点的法案是11月中期选举前的“末班车”。(格雷姆·斯隆/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    目前尚不清楚众议院最终是否会修改参议院为移民执法提供资金的预算蓝图。

    对决议案的任何修改都将把法案退回参议院进行和解,并且在国会正式启动和解程序之前,还需要进行多轮马拉松式投票。

    【点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP】

    与此同时,国土安全部本周警告称,其资金不足,无法继续支付员工薪资至5月。

    4月初,特朗普下令该部门动用现有资金,为在2月中旬开始的拨款停摆期间被休假或上岗却未领到薪水的联邦雇员补发工资。

    House GOP pushes back on Senate’s ‘skinny’ plan to end record-breaking DHS shutdown

    April 25, 2026 8:00am EDT / Fox News

    Some Republicans want defense funding, spending cuts and cost-of-living measures added to the next budget bill

    By Adam Pack , Alex Miller Fox News

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Senate Republicans are forging ahead with a two-step plan to end the record-breakingDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) shutdown, but their House counterparts tell Fox News Digital they are not on board with the strategy.

    A swath of House Republicans have voiced growing frustration that a forthcoming GOP-only funding package does not include other policy priorities beyond funding immigration enforcement ahead of November’s midterm elections.

    “I think we’ve got one last opportunity for reconciliation,” Rep. Pat Harrigan, R-N.C., told Fox News Digital in an interview. “I know some people are talking about two, but I think we’ve got one guaranteed shot.”

    “I like the idea of making it bigger,” he added, mentioning defense funding and affordability concerns. “We’ve got a lot of important stuff to do and we need to get it done.”

    Rep. Pat Harrigan, R-N.C., is advocating for a larger budget reconciliation package that could include defense funding and cost-of-living priorities, but he told Fox News Digital he would ultimately defer to House GOP leadership’s guidance.

    ICE SHUTDOWN FIGHT MIGHT RESTRICT FEMA, COAST GUARD TO ‘LIFE-THREATENING’ EMERGENCIES

    “I’m undecided,” Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., a member of the House Freedom Caucus, told Fox News Digital, referring to the Senate’s approach. “I’ve got issues with it. We believe it should be more expansive.”

    The Senate approved a budget resolution early Thursday largely along party lines that would fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for the rest of President Donald Trump’s term.

    Republicans are pursuing the partisan budget reconciliation process to bypass Democrats and fund immigration enforcement with GOP votes after Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., refused to fund the department without sweeping reforms added to the proposal.

    House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., is racing to pass the Senate’s budget resolution as early as next week, at which point he can afford to lose only a handful of votes. President Donald Trump has set a June 1 deadline to fully fund immigration enforcement through a GOP-only bill, forcing Republicans to act quickly with little room for error.

    Before the DHS shutdown, House Republican leadership teased a budget reconciliation sequel to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that would incorporate a diverse set of priorities, such as a defense supplemental package, spending cuts targeting fraud and policies aimed at lowering the cost of living.

    Concerns among rank-and-file Republicans that a forthcoming budget bill will not include those provisions threaten to jeopardize that timeline.

    Members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus have voiced frustration about the Senate’s “skinny” budget reconciliation package to fund immigration enforcement.(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

    House conservatives have also fiercely objected to the Senate passing a bipartisan partial DHS bill carving out ICE and the Border Patrol from the normal appropriations process and keeping those two agencies unfunded.

    After Democrats in the upper chamber repeatedly filibustered DHS funding bills, the Senate approved legislation funding parts of the department that Democrats would support. The House has yet to take up that legislation.

    “The bill the Senate sent over is totally unacceptable to conservatives,” House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris, R-Md., said Thursday, referring to the upper chamber’s partial DHS bill. “We will never vote or support in any way a bill that puts in a zero” for immigration enforcement, he added.

    “The very premise of needing a reconciliation bill to pass funding for ICE and CBP is repulsive to me,” Higgins told Fox News Digital. “That sort of thing has never been done up here, to take an appropriations bill and sort of cherry pick what you don’t want in it and isolate whole agencies … I’m against that whole premise.”

    BEHIND THE SCENES OF CONGRESS’ ELEVENTH-HOUR RUSH TO FUND THE DHS

    DHS warned this week it is short on funds to continue paying its employees through May.(Photo by Heather Diehl/Getty Images)

    Senate Republicans are largely unified on keeping the package as narrow as possible out of concern that adding more to the pot could stall lawmakers’ progress.

    Senate Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., has sought to expedite the passage of a forthcoming budget bill by involving in the process just two panels —the Senate Judiciary and the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committees.

    “The vast majority of Republicans stuck together to do something Democrats are refusing to do: Fully fund the Border Patrol and ICE for three and a half years through the Trump presidency,” Graham said Thursday after the upper chamber adopted the budget blueprint. “As Senate Budget Committee Chairman, I am very proud of my colleagues.”

    Still, some Senate Republicans agree with their House colleagues who want to supersize the forthcoming package out of fear that they may not get another shot before the midterms.

    Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., argued that Republicans should try to beef up the package despite promises from leadership that there could be a third bite at the apple later in the year.

    “I’m not saying anybody’s lying, they’re not. People probably intend to do a third reconciliation bill,” Kennedy said on the Senate floor. “But you’re not looking at Bambi’s baby brother here. There won’t be a third reconciliation bill. You know it … and I know it. This is it. This is the last train leaving the station.”

    Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., has argued a third budget reconciliation package is unlikely to materialize this year, adding the forthcoming immigration enforcement-focused bill is the “last train leaving the station” ahead of November’s midterm elections.(Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    It is unclear whether the House will ultimately modify the Senate’s budget blueprint funding immigration enforcement.

    Any changes to the resolution would kick it back to the Senate for reconciliation and require another marathon vote series before Congress could officially unlock the reconciliation process.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    DHS, meanwhile, has warned this week it is short on funds to continue paying its employees through May.

    Earlier in April, Trump ordered the department to use existing funds to provide back pay to federal employees who had been furloughed or reported to work without their salary during the funding lapse, which began in mid-February.

  • 伊朗议员:已拟定管理霍尔木兹海峡综合方案


    2026年4月25日 23:17 / 联合早报

    路透社4月25日获得的图片显示,伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队在霍尔木兹海峡扣押“埃帕米农达斯”号(Epaminondas)货轮。 (路透社)

    据伊朗迈赫尔通讯社报道,伊朗议会议员贝赫纳姆·赛义迪说,伊朗已就管理霍尔木兹海峡形成一个综合方案。

    伊朗迈赫尔通讯社星期六(4月25日)报道,赛义迪在接受通讯社采访时说,方案的一项重要内容是,在所有信函和商业文件中,仅承认“波斯湾”这个名称,不接受任何其他名称。区域内航行的船舶和舰艇必须获得伊朗的许可。霍尔木兹海峡的主权将完全掌握在伊朗手中。

    新华社引述报道说,赛义迪还说,伊最高国家安全委员会或武装部队总参谋部认定为敌对国家的船只不得通过霍尔木兹海峡,以色列船只绝对禁止通过该区域。通过该区域的船只须就安全、环境保护、航运管理、许可发放等事项缴纳相关费用,且优先以里亚尔支付。

    对于给伊朗造成损失的国家,赛义迪说,相关国家必须先与伊朗就赔偿方式达成协议,伊方才会向其船只发放通行许可。

    他透露,方案已提交伊朗伊斯兰议会国家安全委员会,一旦议会全体会议恢复,该方案将提交议长团,并在全体会议上进行审议。方案也可能通过最高国家安全委员会批准并发布。

    伊朗国防部:敌人试图体面逃离战争泥潭

    另据伊朗学生通讯社报道,伊朗国防部发言人指出,敌人正试图体面地逃离战争泥潭。

    发言人说,伊朗军队如今是主导力量,敌人正试图体面地从其深陷的战争泥潭中逃离,他们摧毁伊朗导弹和军事力量的企图已完全失败,霍尔木兹海峡已处于伊朗强大控制之下。

    伊朗议员:已拟定管理霍尔木兹海峡综合方案

    2026年4月25日 23:17 / 联合早报

    路透社4月25日获得的图片显示,伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队在霍尔木兹海峡扣押“埃帕米农达斯”号(Epaminondas)货轮。 (路透社)

    据伊朗迈赫尔通讯社报道,伊朗议会议员贝赫纳姆·赛义迪说,伊朗已就管理霍尔木兹海峡形成一个综合方案。

    伊朗迈赫尔通讯社星期六(4月25日)报道,赛义迪在接受通讯社采访时说,方案的一项重要内容是,在所有信函和商业文件中,仅承认“波斯湾”这个名称,不接受任何其他名称。区域内航行的船舶和舰艇必须获得伊朗的许可。霍尔木兹海峡的主权将完全掌握在伊朗手中。

    新华社引述报道说,赛义迪还说,伊最高国家安全委员会或武装部队总参谋部认定为敌对国家的船只不得通过霍尔木兹海峡,以色列船只绝对禁止通过该区域。通过该区域的船只须就安全、环境保护、航运管理、许可发放等事项缴纳相关费用,且优先以里亚尔支付。

    对于给伊朗造成损失的国家,赛义迪说,相关国家必须先与伊朗就赔偿方式达成协议,伊方才会向其船只发放通行许可。

    他透露,方案已提交伊朗伊斯兰议会国家安全委员会,一旦议会全体会议恢复,该方案将提交议长团,并在全体会议上进行审议。方案也可能通过最高国家安全委员会批准并发布。

    伊朗国防部:敌人试图体面逃离战争泥潭

    另据伊朗学生通讯社报道,伊朗国防部发言人指出,敌人正试图体面地逃离战争泥潭。

    发言人说,伊朗军队如今是主导力量,敌人正试图体面地从其深陷的战争泥潭中逃离,他们摧毁伊朗导弹和军事力量的企图已完全失败,霍尔木兹海峡已处于伊朗强大控制之下。

  • 伊朗议员:已拟定管理霍尔木兹海峡综合方案


    2026年4月25日 23:17 / 联合早报

    路透社4月25日获得的图片显示,伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队在霍尔木兹海峡扣押“埃帕米农达斯”号(Epaminondas)货轮。 (路透社)

    据伊朗迈赫尔通讯社报道,伊朗议会议员贝赫纳姆·赛义迪说,伊朗已就管理霍尔木兹海峡形成一个综合方案。

    伊朗迈赫尔通讯社星期六(4月25日)报道,赛义迪在接受通讯社采访时说,方案的一项重要内容是,在所有信函和商业文件中,仅承认“波斯湾”这个名称,不接受任何其他名称。区域内航行的船舶和舰艇必须获得伊朗的许可。霍尔木兹海峡的主权将完全掌握在伊朗手中。

    新华社引述报道说,赛义迪还说,伊最高国家安全委员会或武装部队总参谋部认定为敌对国家的船只不得通过霍尔木兹海峡,以色列船只绝对禁止通过该区域。通过该区域的船只须就安全、环境保护、航运管理、许可发放等事项缴纳相关费用,且优先以里亚尔支付。

    对于给伊朗造成损失的国家,赛义迪说,相关国家必须先与伊朗就赔偿方式达成协议,伊方才会向其船只发放通行许可。

    他透露,方案已提交伊朗伊斯兰议会国家安全委员会,一旦议会全体会议恢复,该方案将提交议长团,并在全体会议上进行审议。方案也可能通过最高国家安全委员会批准并发布。

    伊朗国防部:敌人试图体面逃离战争泥潭

    另据伊朗学生通讯社报道,伊朗国防部发言人指出,敌人正试图体面地逃离战争泥潭。

    发言人说,伊朗军队如今是主导力量,敌人正试图体面地从其深陷的战争泥潭中逃离,他们摧毁伊朗导弹和军事力量的企图已完全失败,霍尔木兹海峡已处于伊朗强大控制之下。

    伊朗议员:已拟定管理霍尔木兹海峡综合方案

    2026年4月25日 23:17 / 联合早报

    路透社4月25日获得的图片显示,伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队在霍尔木兹海峡扣押“埃帕米农达斯”号(Epaminondas)货轮。 (路透社)

    据伊朗迈赫尔通讯社报道,伊朗议会议员贝赫纳姆·赛义迪说,伊朗已就管理霍尔木兹海峡形成一个综合方案。

    伊朗迈赫尔通讯社星期六(4月25日)报道,赛义迪在接受通讯社采访时说,方案的一项重要内容是,在所有信函和商业文件中,仅承认“波斯湾”这个名称,不接受任何其他名称。区域内航行的船舶和舰艇必须获得伊朗的许可。霍尔木兹海峡的主权将完全掌握在伊朗手中。

    新华社引述报道说,赛义迪还说,伊最高国家安全委员会或武装部队总参谋部认定为敌对国家的船只不得通过霍尔木兹海峡,以色列船只绝对禁止通过该区域。通过该区域的船只须就安全、环境保护、航运管理、许可发放等事项缴纳相关费用,且优先以里亚尔支付。

    对于给伊朗造成损失的国家,赛义迪说,相关国家必须先与伊朗就赔偿方式达成协议,伊方才会向其船只发放通行许可。

    他透露,方案已提交伊朗伊斯兰议会国家安全委员会,一旦议会全体会议恢复,该方案将提交议长团,并在全体会议上进行审议。方案也可能通过最高国家安全委员会批准并发布。

    伊朗国防部:敌人试图体面逃离战争泥潭

    另据伊朗学生通讯社报道,伊朗国防部发言人指出,敌人正试图体面地逃离战争泥潭。

    发言人说,伊朗军队如今是主导力量,敌人正试图体面地从其深陷的战争泥潭中逃离,他们摧毁伊朗导弹和军事力量的企图已完全失败,霍尔木兹海峡已处于伊朗强大控制之下。

  • 图书节选:吉姆·克莱伯恩《最初八位》


    2026年4月25日 / 美国东部时间上午11:44 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    利特尔·布朗出版公司
    我们可能会从本文中推荐的商品获得联盟佣金。

    在《最初八位:塑造国家的黑人开国国会议员个人史》(利特尔·布朗出版公司)一书中,南卡罗来纳州民主党人吉姆·克莱伯恩——该州第九位在众议院任职的黑人议员——讲述了帮助指导美国重建时期及之后发展历程的前任议员们的故事。

    请阅读下文节选,不要错过4月26日罗伯特·科斯塔在《哥伦比亚广播公司周日早间节目》中对克莱伯恩议员的采访!


    吉姆·克莱伯恩《最初八位》
    偏好收听?Audible 目前提供30天免费试用。


    引言

    我一生中大部分时间都在谈论本书中的人物。作为第九位来自南卡罗来纳州的黑人国会议员,最初八位当选国会的黑人议员对我有着特殊的意义。2007年我当选众议院多数党党鞭时,曾要求将他们的肖像挂在我的会议室墙上。

    国会图书馆提供了八幅精美的黑白照片,我至今仍珍藏着。它们时刻提醒着我,我是站在巨人的肩膀上。最初八位议员的反抗与坚毅、承诺与目标、信仰与坚韧的精神遗产,每天都在方方面面激励着我。

    这些肖像挂上去后不久,有一群人来见我,其中一人问起这些人是谁。当我告诉他们时,许多人都表现出惊讶。他们原本以为,第一位代表南卡罗来纳州进入国会的黑人正和他们坐在同一张桌子旁。我带着半开玩笑却意在认真的语气回答:“哦不。在我成为第一位之前,已经有八位了。”

    尽管我一生中大部分时间都了解这些人的事迹,但很多人以为我是第一位,这并不让我意外。毕竟,自八位中的最后一位乔治·华盛顿·默里在国会任职以来,已经过去了近一个世纪,直到1992年我才当选。但这次谈话坚定了我长久以来的愿望:讲述这八位议员的故事,以及他们如何代表内战之后新获得解放的400万黑人,他们在极端反对面前几乎毫无恶意、满怀善意地追求美国人人平等的承诺。

    我始终认为,一个人所能达到的境界,不会超出其人生经历所能赋予的范围。本书核心的八位男性有一个共同经历:他们都出生于内战之前,当时这个国家因奴隶制问题严重分裂。尽管如此,他们年轻时期的成长经历各不相同,这也让每位开创性的议员对公共服务有着独特的理解。

    理查德·哈维·凯恩和罗伯特·布朗·埃利奥特都是北方人,并非在蓄奴州长大。他们成年后才来到南卡罗来纳州,未曾经历过这个国家原罪般的奴隶制的非人道之处。

    与此同时,罗伯特·卡洛斯·德·拉格、阿朗佐·雅各布·兰西尔和托马斯·以西结·米勒有幸在南卡罗来纳州由自由黑人父母抚养长大。作为当时所称的“混血儿”——或者像米勒那样,生父为白人、由自由黑人父母抚养长大——他们从父系那里获得了特权。

    最后,约瑟夫·海恩·雷恩、罗伯特·斯莫尔斯和乔治·华盛顿·默里则有着战前南卡罗来纳州更普遍的黑人经历:他们生来就是奴隶。但每个人都通过独特的方式获得了自由:雷恩通过赎买,斯莫尔斯通过逃亡,默里则通过解放。

    尽管背景和经历各不相同,但最初八位议员都在各自的行业中登上顶峰,并在美国最动荡的时期之一——重建时代——占据了国家历史中的独特位置。本书通过最初八位议员的视角讲述这段历史,按时间顺序展开,展现他们如何推动美国重塑政治和社会结构,以落实《独立宣言》中“人人生而平等”的宣言,同时招致了前南方邦联分子的报复,这些人想要“拯救”南卡罗来纳州,恢复内战前的白人至上状态。

    当然,我是以南卡罗来纳州的视角来定义重建时期的。

    我的故乡南卡罗来纳州部分地区的重建始于1861年末联邦军队的到来,结束于1877年联邦军队撤离该州边境。在这一时期,非裔美国人首次获得了担任政治公职的机会。在随后的几十年里,最初八位议员成为南卡罗来纳州黑人多数群体的领袖。他们中的大多数人在重建时期任职国会,其中斯莫尔斯、米勒和默里是在重建时期之后当选的——不过斯莫尔斯曾在重建时期更早当选过。但正如我将在后续章节中展示的那样,这八位全都是共和党议员的英勇努力,无法阻止那些常自称保守民主党人或南方民主党人的团体所实施的暴力与欺诈。但我认为,这两个称谓都是对我许多尊敬的保守民主党朋友,以及我深爱的引以为傲的南方家人的侮辱。因此在本书中,我将根据他们恢复战前白人至上社会秩序的使命,将他们称为“救赎民主党人”。

    这段历史可能会让当代读者产生一些疑问。为什么最初八位议员都是共和党人?考虑到救赎民主党人的历史,为什么我——第九位议员——是民主党人?

    在19世纪,共和党和民主党的理念与今天截然不同。共和党成立于1854年内战前夕,是亚伯拉罕·林肯领导的反奴隶制政党,主要由北方废奴主义者组成;而民主党则主要得到支持奴隶制的南方地区的支持。因此,内战后直到20世纪初,大多数黑人——包括我的父母——都认同共和党,始终忠诚于“林肯的政党”。然而,两党的意识形态开始发生变化,这一转变在民主党人富兰克林·德拉诺·罗斯福担任总统期间达到顶峰。在此期间,许多非裔美国人被罗斯福的社会纲领吸引,开始转向他所在的政党——尽管他的新政政策将大多数黑人排除在援助之外。这一转变在民主党人哈里·杜鲁门任期间加速,他是首位在全国有色人种协进会全国代表大会上发表讲话的总统,其“公平施政”政策包括武装部队一体化;随后的几届政府也延续了这一趋势,其中尤以民主党人林登·贝恩斯·约翰逊的“伟大社会”计划最为突出,该计划包括医疗保险、医疗补助、1964年《民权法案》、1965年《投票权法案》、1968年《公平住房法案》以及其他解决过去种族歧视影响的立法,而这些都遭到了共和党人的反对。如今,政党重组已十分清晰:黑人的公民和政治权利,曾是共和党创始原则之一,也是我和大多数非裔美国人忠诚的核心价值观,如今由民主党倡导。因此,如今大多数非裔美国人都认同民主党。

    关于本书结构的说明:在比较任何一批政治人物时,出于各种原因,有些人会比其他人更引人注目。在我看来,罗伯特·斯莫尔斯——八位议员中唯一真正的内战英雄,也是仅有的两位出席1868年和1895年制宪会议的黑人之一——这两次会议分别赋予并撤销了该州黑人的政治和公民权利——他的人生不仅是八位议员中最具意义的,也是记忆中南卡罗来纳州所有人中最具意义的。还有约瑟夫·海恩·雷恩,作为首位当选美国众议院议员的黑人,他的口才和地位使他成为另一位极具重要性的人物。罗伯特·布朗·埃利奥特的演说甚至比雷恩更能引起共鸣,他是全国知名的受人尊敬的演说家。斯莫尔斯、雷恩和埃利奥特都在全国范围内声名鹊起,他们的地位自然让他们在本书中获得了更多关注,尽管其他五位的人生经历也能给我们所有人带来启示。

    最后,关于语言的说明:在本书中,“Negro”(黑人)、“Colored”(有色人种,指黑人)和“mulatto”(混血儿)等词汇被谨慎使用。最初八位议员中的大多数都是“混血儿”,这是19世纪和20世纪初的常见称谓,如今却容易引起不适。但针对最初八位议员及其选民最恶毒、最频繁使用的 slur(侮辱性称谓)是N字头单词。由于我对这个词发自内心地反感,因此我在本书中没有完整拼写出来。我还有意减少了“slave”(奴隶)一词的使用,这个词会贬低被违背意愿奴役的人的人格。我将他们称为“the enslaved”(被奴役者),这承认了他们的人性,也点明了强加在他们身上的处境。最后,我还选择遵循新版《芝加哥手册》的指导方针,将“Black”(黑人)大写,将“white”(白人)小写。这是一个相对较新的做法,随着“Black”一词如今更多地与文化和种族相关,而非仅仅描述肤色,这一用法逐渐演变。在与一位图书馆员结婚的58年里,我成了语法的严格遵守者,欣然接受了这一新用法。

    和我们所有人一样,最初八位议员也并非完美无缺。但他们迎难而上,决心以行动证明,种族并不能定义一个人的人性。他们深知,除非美国践行其“自由与正义为所有人”的建国原则,否则我们的国家无法实现其民主理想。

    和我的前任们一样,我的人生也根植于信仰与坚韧。正如我在回忆录《蒙福的经历:真正的南方人,自豪的黑人》中所写的那样:“我所有的经历并非都令人愉快,但我认为它们都是祝福。”的确,我的父亲是一名原教旨主义牧师,母亲是一位热心公益的美容师,他们确保我接受了基于圣经原则的教育基础,并且他们坚持认为,尽管我出生在吉姆·克劳法的枷锁之下,我依然可以取得成功,这让我充满勇气。他们都秉承着父亲常说的哲学:以身作则,言传身教,并且践行了父亲的教诲。正是由于他们的教导和实践,我在12岁时就加入了全国有色人种协进会(NAACP)。作为一名大学生,我自然地抵制那些剥夺和我外貌相似的人公民权利的法律,成为了学生非暴力协调委员会(SNCC)的创始成员,并在20世纪50年代末和60年代初担任学生抗议领袖。在此期间我被监禁和逮捕的经历,只会坚定我对我们所追求事业的奉献精神。后来,在我第一份正式工作——查尔斯顿一所高中的历史教师——期间,我下定决心要准确地讲述我们的历史,而不是通过那些在教科书中试图贬低和排除非裔美国人成就的人的视角。

    一路走来,当我展望未来时,我曾参与的运动所取得的来之不易的成功——1964年《民权法案》、1965年《投票权法案》和1968年《公平住房法案》的通过——给了我信心,让我相信有一天我可以担任公职。这一信念帮助我实现了我的政治目标:尽我所能,确保美国的伟大之处能够为所有人所触及和负担得起。

    就像我的八位前任一样,我的人生旅程中也遭遇过反对和挫折。的确,南卡罗来纳州的历史并不总是美好的。其中一些经历对我和许多其他人来说,尤其是那些和我外貌相似的人来说,非常不愉快。但我们的历史就是历史,我认为应该完整地讲述它。而当我讲述为我和无数后来者铺平道路的最初八位议员的历史时,我从未忘记我们州的座右铭:“只要我尚有气息,我就抱有希望。”

    节选自吉姆·克莱伯恩《最初八位》。版权所有©2025年吉姆·克莱伯恩。经哈切特图书集团旗下子公司利特尔·布朗公司许可转载。保留所有权利。

    Book excerpt: “The First Eight” by Jim Clyburn

    April 25, 2026 / 11:44 AM EDT / CBS News

    Little, Brown & Co.

    We may receive an affiliate commission from anything you buy from this article.

    In “The First Eight: A Personal History of the Pioneering Black Congressmen Who Shaped a Nation” (Little, Brown & Co.), South Carolina Democrat Jim Clyburn, the ninth Black man to represent his state in the House of Representatives, writes of his predecessors who helped direct the course of America during and after Reconstruction.

    Read an excerpt below, and don’t miss Robert Costa’s interview with Congressman Clyburn on “CBS Sunday Morning” April 26!

    *

    “The First Eight” by Jim Clyburn

    Prefer to listen? Audible has a 30-day free trial available right now.

    *

    Introduction

    I have been talking about the subjects in this book for most of my life. The first eight Black men elected to Congress from South Carolina hold a special significance to me, the ninth. When I became House majority whip in 2007, I requested that their portraits be hung on my conference room wall.

    The Library of Congress provided eight elegant black-and-white images, which I still treasure. They are a constant reminder of the shoulders I stand upon. The First Eight’s legacies of resistance and resolve, promise and purpose, faith and fortitude, continue to motivate me every day and in every way.

    Soon after these portraits were hung, a group came to meet with me, and one of them asked who they were. When I told them, many of them expressed surprise. They had assumed that the first Black person to ever represent South Carolina in Congress was sitting at the table with them. I replied with my playful-with-a-purpose style, “Oh no. Before I was first, there were eight.”

    Although I have known about these men for most of my life, it doesn’t surprise me that many people think I am the first; after all, prior to my election in 1992, it had been nearly one hundred years since the last of the eight, George Washington Murray, had served in Congress. But this conversation solidified my long-held aspiration to tell the stories of the Eight and how they represented the four million Blacks newly emancipated after the Civil War, and who pursued America’s promise of equality for all while displaying little malice and much charity in the face of extreme opposition.

    I have always maintained that a person can be no more or no less than their life experiences allow them to be. The eight men at the center of this book shared the common experience of being born before the Civil War, when this country was bitterly divided over slavery. Despite this, the differences in their younger, formative years uniquely informed each pioneering man’s approach to public service.

    Richard Harvey Cain and Robert Brown Elliott were Northerners who did not grow up in slave states. Rather, they arrived in South Carolina as adults, not having experienced the inhumaneness of the nation’s original sin.

    Meanwhile, Robert Carlos De Large, Alonzo Jacob Ransier, and Thomas Ezekiel Miller had the fortune of growing up in South Carolina with free Black parents. As “mulattos,” as they were known — or, in Miller’s case, as someone born to white parents and raised by free Black parents — they enjoyed the privileges that their paternity provided.

    Finally, Joseph Hayne Rainey, Robert Smalls, and George Washington Murray shared the more common Black experience in antebellum South Carolina; they were born enslaved. However, each secured their freedom through unique means — Rainey through purchase, Smalls through escape, and Murray through emancipation.

    Despite their diverse backgrounds and different experiences, each of the First Eight rose to the top of his profession and occupied a unique place in our nation’s history during one of its most turbulent periods: the Reconstruction Era. This book tells the history of this era through the perspectives of the First Eight, unfolding chronologically as they contributed to America’s reinvention of its political and social structures to reflect the Declaration of Independence’s proclamation that “all men are created equal,” while incurring the vengeance of former Confederates who wanted to “redeem” South Carolina to its pre-Civil War stance of white supremacy.

    Naturally, I define Reconstruction through a South Carolina lens.

    Reconstruction came early in parts of my home state with the arrival of the Union troops in late 1861, and ending with the departure of federal troops from its borders in 1877. In this period came African Americans’ first opportunity to serve in political office, and over the ensuing decades, the First Eight emerged as leaders among South Carolina’s Black majority. While most of them served in Congress during Reconstruction, three — Smalls, Miller, and Murray — were elected in the post-Reconstruction era, although Smalls had been elected earlier, during Reconstruction. Yet, as I will show in the pages that follow, the valiant efforts of the Eight, all Republican lawmakers, could not stop the violence and fraud deployed by the group that often referred to themselves as Conservative Democrats, or Southern Democrats. But I consider both these monikers to be insults to many of my conservative Democratic friends, whom I respect, and my proud Southern family members, whom I love. So throughout this publication I will refer to them, according to their mission of redeeming the antebellum social order of white supremacy, as “Redeemer Democrats.”

    This history may raise a few questions for today’s readers. Why were the First Eight Republicans? And given the history of the Redeemers, why am I, the ninth, a Democrat?

    In the nineteenth century, the Republican and Democratic parties espoused very different beliefs than they do today. Founded in 1854 in the lead-up to the Civil War, the Republicans — the anti-slavery party of Abraham Lincoln — were mostly composed of Northern abolitionists, while the Democrats found most of their support in the pro-slavery South. As a result, after the Civil War and well into the beginning of the twentieth century, most Blacks, including my parents, identified as Republicans, remaining loyal to the “party of Lincoln.” However, the ideologies of the two parties began to change, a transformation that culminated in the presidency of the Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt. During this period, many Black Americans, drawn to Roosevelt’s social platform, began to shift toward his party — although his New Deal policies excluded assistance for most Blacks. This shift accelerated under President Harry Truman, a Democrat who became the first president to address the NAACP’s National Convention and whose Fair Deal policies included integration of the armed services; and it continued under subsequent administrations, highlighted by Democratic President Lyndon Baines Johnson’s Great Society programs that included Medicare, Medicaid, the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the 1965 Voting Rights Act, the 1968 Fair Housing Act, and other pieces of legislation addressing the effects of past racial discrimination, which the Republican party opposed. Today, the realignment is clear: Civil and political rights for Blacks, among the founding principles of the Republican Party and the fundamental values that I and most African Americans are loyal to, are now championed by Democrats, and consequently, most African Americans today identify with the Democratic Party.

    A note about the structure of this book: When comparing any group of political figures, for various reasons, some emerge as more significant than others. By my estimation, Robert Smalls — the only bona fide Civil War hero of the Eight and one of only two Blacks to serve as a delegate to the 1868 and 1895 Constitutional Conventions, which granted, then revoked, Black political and civil rights in the state — lived the most consequential life, not just of the Eight, but of any South Carolinian in memory. Then there is Joseph Hayne Rainey, whose eloquence and status as the first Black man elected to the U.S. House of Representatives made him another man of great significance. Robert Brown Elliott, whose words resonated more deeply than even Rainey’s, was a revered orator throughout the country. Smalls, Rainey, and Elliott all rose to national prominence, and their stature naturally results in their receiving more attention in this book, though the lived experiences of the other five also provide lessons to us all.

    Finally, a note about language: Throughout this book, words like “Negro,” “Colored” (a Black person), and “mulatto” (a person of mixed race) are sparingly used. The majority of the First Eight were “mulattos,” a common identifier in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries that tends to engender uneasiness today. But perhaps the vilest and most frequently used slur directed at the First Eight and their constituents was the N-word. Because of my visceral aversion to that word, I have made an editorial judgment not to spell it out fully in this book. I have also intentionally minimized the use of the term “slave,” which dehumanizes the people who were held in bondage against their will. I refer to them as “the enslaved,” which recognizes their humanity and speaks to the condition that was forced upon them. Lastly, I have also chosen to follow the new Chicago Manual of Style guidelines and capitalize “Black” and lowercase “white.” This is a relatively new practice that has evolved, as “Black” is a term now associated more with a culture and race than simply describing skin color. During my fifty-eight years of marriage to a librarian, I became a stickler for grammar and happily adopted this new usage.

    Like all of us, the First Eight were not perfect. But they rose to the challenges of their time, determined to demonstrate by example that race does not define one’s humanity. They knew that until America lived by its founding principle of “liberty and justice for all,” our country could not achieve its democratic ideals.

    Like my predecessors, my life has been grounded in faith and fortitude. As I wrote in my memoir, Blessed Experiences: Genuinely Southern, Proudly Black, “All my experiences have not been pleasant, but I have considered all of them to be blessings.” Indeed, my father, a fundamentalist minister, and my mother, a civic-minded beautician, ensured that I received a foundation grounded in biblical principles, and I have been emboldened by their insistence that I could be successful despite being born under the yoke of Jim Crow. Both of them were adherents to my father’s oft-stated philosophy that one should lead by precept and example, and they practiced what Dad preached. Because of their teachings and practices, I became involved with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) at the age of twelve. As a college student, I naturally resisted laws that stripped civil rights from those who looked like me, becoming a founding member of the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and a student protest leader in the late 1950s and early 1960s. The incarcerations and arrests I accrued during this period only strengthened my dedication to the causes we pursued. Then, in my first professional job as a high school history teacher in Charleston, I found the resolve to tell our history accurately, not through the lens of those whose textbooks sought to diminish and exclude African American achievements.

    Through it all, as I looked to the future, the hard-won successes of the movements I had served in — the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the 1965 Voting Rights Act, and the 1968 Fair Housing Act — provided the faith and promise that I could one day serve in public office. This assurance helped fulfill my political purpose: to do everything in my power to ensure that the greatness of America is accessible and affordable to all.

    Just like my eight predecessors, I have encountered opposition and set-backs along my journey. Indeed, South Carolina’s history has not always been positive. Some of it has been very unpleasant for me and many others, especially those who look like me. But our history is what it is, and I believe that complete history should be told. And as I tell the history of the First Eight, who have paved the way for me and countless others to come, I have never lost sight of our State’s motto: “While I breathe, I hope.”

    From “The First Eight” by Jim Clyburn. Copyright © 2025 by Jim Clyburn. Reprinted by permission of Little, Brown and Company, a division of Hachette Book Group. All rights reserved.

  • 美国同意委内瑞拉政府为马杜罗支付律师费,结束长达数周的法律对峙


    2026-04-25T13:30:56.772Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    作者:卡拉·斯坎内尔

    更新于美国东部时间2026年4月25日上午10:31

    发布于美国东部时间2026年4月25日上午9:30


    2026年1月5日,纽约市,被罢免的委内瑞拉总统尼古拉斯·马杜罗在武装联邦特工押送下,于曼哈顿直升机坪下机后戴着手铐,被押上装甲车前往曼哈顿一家法院。

    XNY/Star Max/GC Images/Getty Images

    美国已同意允许委内瑞拉政府为被罢免的总统尼古拉斯·马杜罗筹集辩护资金,这场持续数周、给该案蒙上阴影的法律对峙就此结束。

    联邦检察官和马杜罗的律师在周五深夜提交给负责审理该案的法官的联合信函中表示,美国财政部已同意修改一项许可证,允许向马杜罗及其同样面临刑事指控的妻子的律师支付费用,且不会违反美国制裁法。马杜罗及其妻子对毒品和武器指控拒不认罪。

    “修改后的许可证授权辩护律师在特定条件下从委内瑞拉政府获得付款,”检察官和辩护律师告诉法官,付款将使用“2026年3月5日之后委内瑞拉政府可动用的资金”支付。

    马杜罗夫妇和委内瑞拉政府均受到美国制裁,因此任何试图从他们处获取付款的机构都需要获得美国财政部外国资产控制办公室(OFAC)的许可证,以免违反美国制裁法。

    上月末,尼古拉斯·马杜罗的律师巴里·波拉克表示,外国资产控制办公室曾批准后又撤销了一项允许委内瑞拉政府支付其律师费的许可证。

    检察官称这是一起“行政失误”,马杜罗夫妇可以动用他们在委内瑞拉的个人资金支付法律费用,但波拉克辩称,撤销许可证侵犯了马杜罗为指控进行辩护的宪法权利。据波拉克透露,马杜罗夫妇曾作证称他们没有可用的个人资金支付律师费。

    马杜罗的律师此前曾要求法官驳回起诉书,称美国政府阻碍了他们针对一起恐怖主义贩毒共谋案的刑事指控进行辩护的能力。

    在上月的一场听证会上,检察官指控马杜罗夫妇“掠夺委内瑞拉的财富”,并表示美国政府应有能力“利用制裁影响外交政策”。

    “这就是制裁的目的,也是限制资金获取的合理理由,”检察官说道,“法官大人您也知道,这一目的早于本案的刑事诉讼程序。”

    阿尔文·赫勒斯坦法官对政府的立场表示怀疑,称马杜罗及其妻子目前处于联邦羁押状态,他不认为两人构成任何威胁。

    检察官表示,马杜罗夫妇的律师已撤回了他们的法律挑战。

    马杜罗夫妇目前被关押在布鲁克林的大都会拘留中心。

    波拉克曾表示,他将对马杜罗被捕的合法性提出质疑,并辩称马杜罗享有起诉豁免权,因为所指控的非法行为发生在其担任总统期间。

    马杜罗于2013年首次当选委内瑞拉总统。但自2019年以来,美国政府和其他数十个国家均不承认他是委内瑞拉的合法领导人。

    今年3月,特朗普政府承认马杜罗的前副手德尔西·罗德里格斯为委内瑞拉领导人。

    这是突发新闻,将随时补充最新信息。

    US agrees Venezuelan government can pay Maduro’s legal fees, ending weekslong standoff

    2026-04-25T13:30:56.772Z / CNN

    By Kara Scannell

    Updated Apr 25, 2026, 10:31 AM ET

    PUBLISHED Apr 25, 2026, 9:30 AM ET

    Nicolas Maduro is seen in handcuffs after landing at a Manhattan helipad, escorted by heavily armed federal agents, as they make their way into an armored car en route to a courthouse in Manhattan on January 5, 2026, in New York City.

    XNY/Star Max/GC Images/Getty Images

    The US has agreed to allow the Venezuelan government to fund the defense of ousted President Nicolás Maduro, ending a legal standoff that has clouded the case for weeks.

    Federal prosecutors and attorneys for the Maduros informed the judge overseeing the case in a joint letter filed late Friday night that the Treasury Department agreed to amend a license allowing for payments to attorneys for Maduro and his wife, who is also facing criminal charges, without violating US sanctions laws. Maduro and his wife have pleaded not guilty to drug and weapons charges.

    “The amended licenses authorize defense counsel to receive payments from the Government of Venezuela under certain conditions,” prosecutors and lawyers for the defense told the judge, so that the payments are made with money “available to the Government of Venezuela after March 5, 2026.”

    The Maduros and Venezuelan government are both sanctioned by the US, so anybody seeking payment from them needs to obtain a license from the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control to avoid violating US sanctions laws.

    Late last month, Nicolás Maduro’s attorney, Barry Pollack, said the OFAC granted and then revoked a license allowing the Venezuelan government to pay his legal fees.

    Prosecutors said it was an “administrative error” and the Maduros could access their personal funds in Venezuela to cover their legal expenses, but Pollack argued the reversal violated Maduro’s constitutional right to defend against the charges. The Maduros had testified they do not have their own funds available to pay the legal fees, per Pollack.

    Lawyers for the Maduros previously asked the judge to dismiss the indictment, saying the US government was hindering their ability to defense against criminal charges related to a narco-terrorism conspiracy scheme.

    During a hearing last month, prosecutors accused the Maduros of “plundering the wealth of Venezuela” and said the government should have the ability to “use sanctions to influence foreign policy.”

    “That is the purpose of the sanctions and a justifiable reason for limiting access to funds,” the attorney said. “As your honor knows, that purpose predated the criminal case here.”

    Judge Alvin Hellerstein was skeptical of the government’s position, saying Maduro and his wife were in federal custody and he didn’t believe they posed any threat.

    Prosecutors said the Maduros’ attorneys have dropped their legal challenge.

    The Maduros are being held in federal custody at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.

    Pollack has signaled that he will challenge the legality of Maduro’s arrest and argues he is immune from prosecution because the alleged illegal conduct occurred while he was president.

    Maduro was first elected president of Venezuela in 2013. But the US government, along with dozens of other countries, has not recognized him as the legitimate leader of Venezuela since 2019.

    In March, the Trump administration recognized Delcy Rodríguez, Maduro’s former deputy, as the leader of Venezuela.

    This is a breaking news story and will be updated with additional information.

  • 伊朗外长与巴基斯坦官员会谈后离开伊斯兰堡


    2026年4月25日 23:33 / 联合早报

    伊朗外长与巴基斯坦官员会谈后离开伊斯兰堡


    4月25日发布的照片显示,巴基斯坦副总理兼外交部长达尔(左)在伊斯兰堡机场迎接到访的伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐。 (路透社)


    伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐已经离开伊斯兰堡。他于星期五(4月24日)抵达,与巴基斯坦高级官员举行会谈,讨论与美国进行的和平谈判。

    法新社报道,两周前,华盛顿和德黑兰在巴基斯坦首都举行了首轮直接会谈,此前双方就美国和以色列对伊战争达成了临时停火协议。但双方尚未举行第二轮会谈。

    美国特使威特科夫和总统女婿贾里德·库什纳预计将很快抵达伊斯兰堡。

    伊朗外长与巴基斯坦官员会谈后离开伊斯兰堡

    2026年4月25日 23:33 / 联合早报

    伊朗外长与巴基斯坦官员会谈后离开伊斯兰堡

    4月25日发布的照片显示,巴基斯坦副总理兼外交部长达尔(左)在伊斯兰堡机场迎接到访的伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐。 (路透社)

    伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐已经离开伊斯兰堡。他于星期五(4月24日)抵达,与巴基斯坦高级官员举行会谈,讨论与美国进行的和平谈判。

    法新社报道,两周前,华盛顿和德黑兰在巴基斯坦首都举行了首轮直接会谈,此前双方就美国和以色列对伊战争达成了临时停火协议。但双方尚未举行第二轮会谈。

    美国特使威特科夫和总统女婿贾里德·库什纳预计将很快抵达伊斯兰堡。

  • 伊朗外长与巴基斯坦官员会谈后离开伊斯兰堡


    2026年4月25日 23:33 / 联合早报

    伊朗外长与巴基斯坦官员会谈后离开伊斯兰堡

    4月25日发布的照片显示,巴基斯坦副总理兼外交部长达尔(左)在伊斯兰堡机场迎接到访的伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐。 (路透社)

    伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐已经离开伊斯兰堡。他于星期五(4月24日)抵达,与巴基斯坦高级官员举行会谈,讨论与美国进行的和平谈判。

    法新社报道,两周前,华盛顿和德黑兰在巴基斯坦首都举行了首轮直接会谈,此前双方就美国和以色列对伊战争达成了临时停火协议。但双方尚未举行第二轮会谈。

    美国特使威特科夫和总统女婿贾里德·库什纳预计将很快抵达伊斯兰堡。

    4月25日发布的照片显示,巴基斯坦副总理兼外交部长达尔(左)在伊斯兰堡机场迎接到访的伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐。 (路透社)

    伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐已经离开伊斯兰堡。他于星期五(4月24日)抵达,与巴基斯坦高级官员举行会谈,讨论与美国进行的和平谈判。

    法新社报道,两周前,华盛顿和德黑兰在巴基斯坦首都举行了首轮直接会谈,此前双方就美国和以色列对伊战争达成了临时停火协议。但双方尚未举行第二轮会谈。

    美国特使威特科夫和总统女婿贾里德·库什纳预计将很快抵达伊斯兰堡。

  • 泰国退出海域备忘录 柬埔寨表示遗憾


    2026年4月25日 18:42 / 联合早报

    泰国单方面退出双方于2001年签署的关于两国重叠海域问题的谅解备忘录,柬埔寨对此深表遗憾。

    柬埔寨外交与国际合作部星期五(4月24日)发表声明说,备忘录的签署不仅仅是一项技术安排,它体现了两国真诚的意愿和共同利益,即本着诚意,寻求在重叠海域共同开发资源,并同时根据国际法推进海上边界划定工作。“泰国单方面退出2001年备忘录,将背离签署文件所秉持的合作精神。”

    新华社引述声明说,柬埔寨方面始终坚定不移地恪守2001年备忘录的条文和精神,以及促成备忘录签署的善意和诚意。

    泰国首相阿努廷23日说,将废除前首相达信当政时期与柬埔寨签署的一份关于重叠海域问题的备忘录。阿努廷说,此举无需通知柬方,内阁将尽快审议相关决定。泰国海军参谋长他达武·他比达恭说,废除备忘录的原因是其已沿用多年但没有取得进展。柬埔寨目前已加入《联合国海洋法公约》,泰柬可以在公约框架内协商。

    泰国退出海域备忘录 柬埔寨表示遗憾

    2026年4月25日 18:42 / 联合早报

    泰国单方面退出双方于2001年签署的关于两国重叠海域问题的谅解备忘录,柬埔寨对此深表遗憾。

    柬埔寨外交与国际合作部星期五(4月24日)发表声明说,备忘录的签署不仅仅是一项技术安排,它体现了两国真诚的意愿和共同利益,即本着诚意,寻求在重叠海域共同开发资源,并同时根据国际法推进海上边界划定工作。“泰国单方面退出2001年备忘录,将背离签署文件所秉持的合作精神。”

    新华社引述声明说,柬埔寨方面始终坚定不移地恪守2001年备忘录的条文和精神,以及促成备忘录签署的善意和诚意。

    泰国首相阿努廷23日说,将废除前首相达信当政时期与柬埔寨签署的一份关于重叠海域问题的备忘录。阿努廷说,此举无需通知柬方,内阁将尽快审议相关决定。泰国海军参谋长他达武·他比达恭说,废除备忘录的原因是其已沿用多年但没有取得进展。柬埔寨目前已加入《联合国海洋法公约》,泰柬可以在公约框架内协商。

湘ICP备2026001899号-2