分类: 未分类

  • 法院文件显示:国家公园管理局将在独立日假期后抽干水池并修复林肯纪念堂倒影池


    2026-06-25T17:06:41.033Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/25/politics/reflecting-pool-repairs

    美国国家公园管理局运营副主任在周三提交的一份法院文件中表示,该局将在独立日庆祝活动结束后抽干并修复林肯纪念堂倒影池。

    “国家公园管理局计划在独立日庆祝活动结束后开始抽干倒影池,开展修复工作,包括评估并修复池壁衬里的任何损坏,”国家公园管理局运营副主任弗兰克·兰兹在文件中说道。

    这份文件为水池修复工作的启动时间提供了明确时间表。此前,唐纳德·特朗普总统周二在Truth Social平台上称,水池将“在独立日假期之前或之后立即抽干”。

    兰兹在文件中还进一步佐证了特朗普政府关于水池遭破坏的指控,称约有“70根围栏柱顶被扔进池中”,且泡沫密封剂上的填缝料“被利器或剃须刀割开”。

    这位副主任的声明是针对该水池的持续法律诉讼的一部分。近期数周来,该水池一直问题缠身,从破坏指控到藻类爆发,再到蓝色涂层剥落。

    一个非营利组织上月起诉特朗普政府,反对总统下令将水池涂成蓝色的行政令,辩称该项目违反联邦法律,要求内政部在开工前完成包括通知公众、征求其他联邦机构意见在内的咨询程序。

    周一,该非营利组织的律师在另一份文件中表示,近期的事态发展进一步证明,有必要要求政府遵守相关程序步骤。

    但政府方面的律师周三辩称,困扰水池的问题“与原告所质疑的机构决策的合法性毫无关系”。

    今年早些时候,特朗普出于“美化”美国首都的目的,对该水池表现出个人兴趣。3月下旬,他在Truth Social平台上称,自己正与内政部长道格·伯格拉姆合作修复该水池。该水池曾在奥巴马政府时期于2012年完成过为期两年的翻新工程。

    在随后的几周里,特朗普扩大了该项目的范围,并下令进行外观改造,包括将池底涂成类似美国国旗蓝色区域的色调。

    此次翻新工程还被加快推进,以便在美国建国250周年纪念日前完成。

    但就在本月初水池重新注水的一天后,问题就显现了出来:从池边就能看到大量藻类。

    短短几天内,成堆的藻类覆盖了整个水池,促使政府派遣工作人员进行真空清理、安装被称为“臭氧纳米气泡发生器”的过滤系统,并向池中投放了加仑量级的过氧化氢。

    上周,池底的蓝色涂层开始剥落。特朗普随后称已有多人因破坏水池被捕。

    内政部发言人周四告诉美国有线电视新闻网(CNN),目前已有18起针对水池破坏行为的警方报案,另有7人被捕。

    在周三的文件中,兰兹表示,6月9日,美国公园警察接到国家公园管理局的报案,称池内泡沫密封剂上的填缝料有一处被割开。

    特朗普曾多次提及水池上的“一道大裂口”,并持续抨击所谓的破坏其亲自参与的项目的行为。他对此给出了不同的描述:先是称裂口长250英尺,随后又加大了尺寸,之后又改口称“实际上是沿350英尺长的区域有多处刀割痕迹”。

    周三提交的文件并未提及所谓割痕的具体长度。

    《纽约时报》本周早些时候报道称,政府内部文件显示,国家公园管理局工作人员“在水池伸缩缝之间的泡沫材料上发现两处割痕,每处长171英尺”。但该报同时指出,文件并未就这些割痕是如何形成的给出任何指控。

    本周早些时候,CNN采访了多名游客,其中大多数人对此次翻新工程并不满意。

    60岁的马洛里·博伊德是土生土长的华盛顿特区居民,她记得小时候曾沿着水池骑车玩耍。她称此次翻新工程是在浪费纳税人的钱。

    “我认为,我们纳税人在这项出了岔子且本无必要的修复工程上花费如此多资金,简直是一场闹剧,”她周二对CNN说道。

    与此同时,从堪萨斯州到访华盛顿特区的塔德·瓦格纳则对水池现状表示满意。

    “我看过几篇报道称他们为翻新工程投入了大量资金,我觉得效果不错,”瓦格纳说道,他还补充称,关于水池遭到破坏的说法“着实令人失望”。

    从纽约州北部专程前来参观水池的雅克琳·麦克唐纳周二对CNN表示,围绕该水池的争论正在成为历史。

    她称水池“相当恶心”,并补充道:“我告诉孩子们,总有一天我们会在历史书中读到这件事,会读到这座倒影池遭遇了什么,以及这是多么的国之耻辱,我希望能亲口说我当时就在现场。”

    CNN记者迈克尔·威廉姆斯、凯特琳·波兰茨、德文·科尔和丹尼尔·戴尔对本文亦有报道。

    Park Service will drain, repair Reflecting Pool after July Fourth, court filing says

    2026-06-25T17:06:41.033Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/25/politics/reflecting-pool-repairs

    The National Park Service will drain and repair the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool after July Fourth celebrations, the agency’s deputy director for operations said in a court filing Wednesday.

    “The National Park Service plans to begin draining the reflecting pool following the Independence Day celebration to conduct repairs, including assessing and repairing any damage to the lining,” NPS Deputy Director for Operations Frank Lands said in the filing.

    The filing provides a firm timeline for when pool repairs will begin as President Donald Trump said on Truth Social Tuesday that it would be drained “either immediately before or after the Fourth of July.”

    Lands, in the filing, also furthered the Trump administration’s allegations of vandalism, saying in the filing that about “70 fence post tops were thrown into the pool,” and a caulk over the foam sealant “was cut with a sharp knife or razor.”

    The deputy director’s declaration was filed as part of an ongoing legal battle over the pool, which has been riddled with issues in recent weeks from claims of vandalism to algae bloom and peeling blue material.

    A nonprofit sued the Trump administration last month over the president’s order to paint the pool blue, arguing that the project violates federal laws requiring the Interior Department to complete a consultation process that includes notifying the public and getting input from other federal agencies before beginning the work.

    On Monday, lawyers for the nonprofit said in their own filing that recent developments reinforce the need to require the administration to follow certain procedural steps.

    But lawyers for the administration argued Wednesday that the problems plaguing the pool “have nothing at all to do with the legality of the agency decision that Plaintiffs challenge.”

    Trump took a personal interest in the pool earlier this year as part of his efforts to “beautify” the nation’s capital. In late March, he said on Truth Social that he was working to fix the pool along with Interior Secretary Doug Burgum. The pool had previously gone through a two-year renovation in 2012 during the Obama administration.

    In the weeks that followed, Trump expanded the scope of the project and ordered cosmetic changes, including painting the bottom of the pool a shade of blue that resembles the American flag’s blue field.

    The renovation was also expedited so it would be completed before the country’s 250th anniversary.

    But signs that the project did not go according to plan emerged just a day after the reservoir was filled earlier this month with quite a bit of algae visible from the water’s edge.

    Within days, clumps of algae took over the pool, prompting the administration to send in workers to vacuum it out, install a filtration system known as the “ozone nanobubbler” and dump gallons of hydrogen peroxide in the pool.

    Last week, blue material at the bottom of pool began peeling off. The president then said several people were arrested for vandalizing the pool.

    An Interior Department spokesperson told CNN Thursday there have been 18 police reports filed for vandalism of the pool, adding that seven people were arrested.

    In Wednesday’s filing, Lands said on June 9, US Park Police responded to an NPS report of a cut in a caulk over the pool’s foam sealant.

    Trump has repeatedly mentioned a “gash” in the pool as he continues to rail against alleged vandalism of a project he was personally invested in. He has offered varying descriptions — first calling it a 250-foot cut and then increasing that measurement. He later said there were “actually numerous slashes over a very long 350 foot length.”

    Wednesday’s filing did not provide any details about the length of the supposed cut.

    The New York Times reported earlier this week that internal government documents showed that NPS workers “found two cuts in sections of foam between the pool’s expansion joints,” each 171 feet long. However, the Times said, the documents did not make any allegations about how these reported cuts ended up in the pool.

    Earlier this week, CNN spoke with several visitors, a majority of whom were not pleased with the renovation.

    Mallory Boyd, 60, a lifelong DC resident who remembers riding her bike along the pool as a child, called the renovation a “waste” of taxpayer dollars.

    “I think that it is a travesty that we are spending as taxpayers this much money on a restoration that was afoul and for something that was not necessary,” she told CNN on Tuesday.

    Meanwhile, Tad Wagner, who is visiting Washington, DC, from Kansas, was satisfied with the pool.

    “I’ve read a couple of reports that they spent a lot of money to redo it. I think it looks good,” Wagner said, adding that claims that the pool has been vandalized were “really disappointing.”

    Jaclyn MacDonald, who traveled from upstate New York to see the pool, stressed to CNN on Tuesday that the debate surrounding the pool is history in the making.

    Describing the pool as “pretty gross,” she added: “I told my kids that, you know, one day we’re going to read about this in history books, we’re going to read about what happened to this Reflecting Pool and the national disgrace that it is, and I want to be able to say that I was there.”

    CNN’s Michael Williams, Katelyn Polantz, Devan Cole and Daniel Dale contributed to this report.

  • 特朗普在最高法院庇护案中获胜——但自由派大法官警告此举或在边境适得其反


    2026年6月25日 美国东部时间下午3:01 / 福克斯新闻频道

    最高法院为特朗普政府带来了重大移民政策胜利,确认了总统有权终止临时保护身份,并拒绝边境入境寻求庇护者的入境申请。宪法法律律师乔纳森·特利分析了这两项关键的6比3裁决的影响,强调了其对边境主权和美国未来移民政策的意义。

    最高法院周四限制庇护申请的裁决受到移民强硬派的欢迎,但根据三名持不同意见的大法官和涉案移民非营利组织的说法,这项裁决最终可能会增加非法越境人数。

    周四,最高法院在“马伦诉奥特罗·拉多案”中裁定,移民必须实际踏上美国领土才有资格申请庇护,推翻了下级法院要求政府对在入境口岸被拒的部分寻求庇护者进行受理的裁决。尽管这项裁决被广泛认为会让庇护申请更难获批,这也是特朗普政府的目标之一,但索尼娅·索托马约尔大法官和奥特罗·拉多组织均认为,该裁决可能会产生意想不到的后果。

    “本院此前曾承认,移民法规和程序不应被解释为‘产生以非法而非合法地点入境的反常激励’。然而,多数派的解释恰恰做到了这一点,”索托马约尔在反对意见中写道。“它告诉寻求庇护者,如果能非法越境就能申请庇护,但如果耐心在入境口岸等候,则无法申请。”

    奥特罗·拉多组织也持类似观点,在法庭文件中指出,将庇护资格限制在实际进入美国境内的人群,会“产生在入境口岸之间越境的反常激励”,因为这样做的人将比在口岸被拦下的人拥有更多权利。

    最高法院为特朗普带来两项重大移民胜利

    图片)

    目前尚不清楚对此裁决表示庆祝的国土安全部是否已为寻求庇护者非法越境人数可能上升做好准备。福克斯新闻数字频道周四联系国土安全部征求评论,但该部门未予回应。

    由塞缪尔·阿利托大法官领导的保守派多数派淡化了这种可能性,称这种担忧“言过其实”。

    图片)

    司法部在这场事关重大的最高法院边境案件中指责法院削弱行政权力

    “入境核验并不会永久阻止任何外国公民抵达美国并随后申请庇护,”阿利托代表多数派写道。“另一方面,非法入境可能代价高昂且危险重重,还会带来不利的法律后果。在不当地点入境属于犯罪行为。如果外国公民在被遣返后非法再次入境,将丧失庇护资格。”

    “因入境核验而延误入境和检查的外国公民,除非有充分理由立即申请庇护,否则更愿意承担非法入境的所有风险,”他补充道。

    特朗普政府为经过背景审查的移民放宽庇护冻结政策,但保留对“高风险”国家的禁令

    图片)

    入境核验指的是限制每天有多少寻求庇护者可以接近或进入美国入境口岸进行受理的做法。根据这项政策,移民通常会被告知在墨西哥等候,直到美国官员确认口岸有受理能力。

    阿利托的推理不足以说服索托马约尔和其他持不同意见的大法官。

    “但关键不在于非法入境总能让寻求庇护者获得净收益;而在于国会不太可能设计出这样一种制度:庇护仅对非法踏上美国边境的人开放,却不对那些试图遵守法律、但在入境口岸入口处被移民官员拦下的人开放,”她写道。“还有一个不幸的现实是,尽管多数派提到了不利后果,但许多寻求庇护者不顾一切逃离本国遭受的迫害,愿意冒着重大风险申请庇护。”

    索托马约尔随后援引了国土安全部监察长办公室2018年的一份报告,该报告发现入境核验产生了“意想不到的后果”,导致“一些原本会寻求合法入境美国的外国公民非法越境”。

    该报告是在下级法院裁定边境被拒的移民可以申请庇护之前发布的,这意味着其涵盖的情况与最高法院确立的新现状相当。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    “本届政府已经证明,边境可以阻止非法入境。随着边境墙建设的推进,威慑非法越境的能力只会增强,”右翼组织美国移民改革联合会的诉讼主管马特·克拉波告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。

    “只要联邦政府将边境安全作为优先事项,非法越境就不应成为主要担忧,”他补充道。

    Trump scores SCOTUS asylum win — but liberal justice warns it could backfire at border

    June 25, 2026 3:01pm EDT / Fox News

    The Supreme Court delivers significant immigration victories for the Trump administration, affirming presidential authority to end temporary protected status and turn away asylum seekers at the border. Constitutional law attorney Jonathan Turley breaks down the impact of these crucial 6-3 decisions, highlighting their implications for border sovereignty and future immigration policy in the United States.

    The Supreme Court’s Thursday decision to restrict asylum applications, hailed by immigration hawks, could actually end up increasing illegal crossings, according to the three dissenting justices and immigration nonprofit involved in the case.

    On Thursday, the Supreme Court held in Mullin v. Al Otro Lado that migrants must physically set foot in the United States in order to be eligible for asylum, reversing lower court rulings that had required the government to process certain asylum seekers turned away at ports of entry. While the decision is broadly viewed as making asylum claims more difficult to secure, an objective of the Trump administration, Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Al Otro Lado both argue that it may have unintended consequences.

    “This Court has previously recognized that immigration statutes and procedures should not be construed to ‘create a perverse incentive to enter at an unlawful rather than a lawful location. ​​Yet, the majority’s construction does exactly that,” Sotomayor wrote in her dissent. “It tells asylum seekers that they may apply for asylum if they can make it across the border illegally but that they cannot apply if they patiently wait at the edge of a port of entry.”

    Al Otro Lado argued on similar lines, stating in a court filing that restricting asylum access to those who physically enter the United States would”create a perverse incentive to cross the border between ports of entry” as people who do so will receive greater rights than those stopped at ports.

    SUPREME COURT HANDS TRUMP TWO MAJOR IMMIGRATION VICTORIES

    Asylum seekers seen walking toward the southern border in Tijuana, Mexico and a image of a courtroom in the Concord Immigration Court. Kyra Lilien, an immigration judge is suing the Trump administration over her termination, alleging she was fired because of her political affiliations.(Getty Images; Concord Immigration Court)

    It is unclear if the Department of Homeland Security, which celebrated the decision, has prepared for the potential uptick in asylum seekers illegally crossing the border. DHS did not respond to a request for comment when reached by Fox News Digital on Thursday.

    The conservative majority, led by Justice Samuel Alito, downplayed this possibility, calling the concern “overstated.”

    Pro and anti-Trump demonstrators rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on April 1, 2026, before justices hear oral arguments on whether President Donald Trump can deny citizenship to children born to parents who are in the United States illegally or temporarily.(J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press)

    DOJ ACCUSES COURTS OF UNDERCUTTING EXECUTIVE POWER IN HIGH-STAKES SUPREME COURT BORDER CASE

    “Metering does not permanently bar any alien from arriving in the United States and then applying for asylum,” Alito wrote for the majority. “Illegal entry, on the other hand, may be expensive and dangerous, and it carries adverse legal effects. Entry at an improper location is a crime. An alien becomes ineligible for asylum if he unlawfully re-enters the country after having been removed.”

    “An alien whose admission and inspection are delayed due to metering would need a powerful reason to apply for asylum immediately for it to be preferable to run all the risks of illegal entry,” he added.

    TRUMP ADMIN EASES ASYLUM FREEZE FOR VETTED MIGRANTS, KEEPS BANS ON ‘HIGH-RISK’ NATIONS

    Migrants cross illegally through a hole in a fence near El Paso, Texas, on Dec. 22, 2022, after the U.S. Supreme Court halted the removal of Title 42, a policy used to block migrants at the southwest border.(Allison Dinner/AFP)

    Metering refers to the practice of limiting how many asylum seekers can approach or enter a U.S. port of entry each day for processing. Under the policy, migrants were often told to wait in Mexico until U.S. officials determined the port had capacity.

    Alito’s rationale was not enough to convince Sotomayor and the other dissenting justices.

    “The point, however, is not that illegal entry always produces a net windfall for asylum seekers; it is that Congress was unlikely to devise a system in which asylum is available to those who unlawfully set foot over the border, but not to those who attempt to comply with the law and are physically blocked from entering at the threshold of a port of entry by an immigration officer,” she wrote. “It is also the unfortunate reality that, despite the adverse consequences the majority cites, many asylum seekers are desperate enough to flee the persecution they face in their home countries that they are willing to run significant risks to apply for asylum.”

    Sotomayor went on to cite a 2018 DHS Office of the Inspector General report that found metering had “unintended consequences” which “le[d] some aliens who would otherwise seek legal entry into the United States to cross the border illegally.”

    The report was published before lower courts held that migrants turned away at the border could apply for asylum, meaning that the conditions it covered are comparable to the new status quo set by the Supreme Court.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “This administration has demonstrated that the border can be secured against illegal entries. As border wall construction continues, the ability to deter illegal crossings will only improve,” Matt Crapo, the director of litigation at the right-wing Federation for American Immigration Reform, told Fox News Digital.

    “So long as the federal government makes border security a priority, illegal crossings should not be a major concern,” he added.

  • 埃隆·马斯克被下令在选举抽奖相关案件中作证;其中一起诉讼可能被缩小范围


    2026-06-25 19:45:54 UTC / 路透社

    作者:乔纳森·斯坦普尔

    2026年6月25日 世界标准时间晚上7:45 更新于2分钟前

    image
    2026年4月29日,美国加利福尼亚州奥克兰的联邦法院内,埃隆·马斯克前往参加其针对OpenAI营利性转型的诉讼庭审。路透社/曼努埃尔·奥贝戈索 资料图

    企业

    太空探索技术公司 关注
    特斯拉公司 关注

    6月25日(路透社)——一名联邦法官下令埃隆·马斯克在两起拟议的集体诉讼中宣誓作证,这些诉讼指控他在2024年大选前于摇摆州承诺每日发放100万美元奖金,以此欺骗选民。

    得克萨斯州奥斯汀的美国治安法官苏珊·海托华在周四的裁决中还建议,马斯克及其政治行动委员会美国政治行动委员会(America PAC)在其中一起诉讼中面临一项指控,即他们诱骗选民提供个人身份信息,以此作为该抽奖活动的一部分。她表示,相关的违约指控应被驳回。

    订阅每日案卷新闻简报,将最新法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱,开启您的清晨。点击此处注册。

    广告 · 继续向下滚动

    马斯克的律师没有立即回应置评请求。两起诉讼的原告律师也没有立即回应类似的置评请求,或暂无置评。

    原告方:100万美元获奖者并非随机抽取

    两名来自亚利桑那州的原告乔伊·哈维奇和杰奎琳·麦卡弗蒂表示,马斯克和美国政治行动委员会误导了七个摇摆州的选民签署支持美国宪法的请愿书,同时承诺100万美元的获奖者将“像抽奖一样随机选出”。

    她们称选民实际上没有任何中奖机会,并援引马斯克一名律师的说法,表示18名获奖者是因为他们“可能成为美国政治行动委员会的优秀代言人”而被选中的。

    广告 · 继续向下滚动

    马斯克创立美国政治行动委员会是为了支持共和党人唐纳德·特朗普2024年总统竞选的成功,并于当年10月在宾夕法尼亚州的一场市政厅活动中宣布了该抽奖活动。

    他同时也是全球首富,旗下企业包括电动汽车制造商特斯拉(TSLA.O,打开新标签页)以及火箭和卫星公司太空探索技术公司(SPCX.O,打开新标签页)。

    法官:马斯克是否轻率发言尚不明确

    在建议麦卡弗蒂的欺诈指控继续推进时,海托华表示,马斯克在称奖金发放将“随机”进行时是否行事轻率,仍是一个悬而未决的问题。

    法官援引了美国政治行动委员会主任克里斯托弗·杨在2026年2月的证词中所言,他对马斯克的措辞“感到惊讶”。

    “这不是我们——你知道的,在咨询法律顾问后——讨论该项目及其运作方式时所采用的方式,”杨说道。

    位于奥斯汀的美国地区法官罗伯特·皮特曼将对海托华的建议进行审查。

    blob:https://www.reuters.com/ca54afd7-dbe3-41ac-9f2e-4165d2e4a7d7

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-ordered-testify-election-lottery-cases-one-lawsuit-may-be-narrowed-2026-06-25/
    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-ordered-testify-election-lottery-cases-one-lawsuit-may-be-narrowed-2026-06-25/
    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-ordered-testify-election-lottery-cases-one-lawsuit-may-be-narrowed-2026-06-25/
    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-ordered-testify-election-lottery-cases-one-lawsuit-may-be-narrowed-2026-06-25/
    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-ordered-testify-election-lottery-cases-one-lawsuit-may-be-narrowed-2026-06-25/
    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-ordered-testify-election-lottery-cases-one-lawsuit-may-be-narrowed-2026-06-25/
    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-ordered-testify-election-lottery-cases-one-lawsuit-may-be-narrowed-2026-06-25/

    马斯克和美国政治行动委员会同时要求驳回哈维奇的诉讼。皮特曼将自行裁决他们的动议。

    广告 · 继续向下滚动

    乔纳森·斯坦普尔 纽约报道
    马修·刘易斯 编辑

    我们的准则:汤森路透信托原则,打开新标签页

    Elon Musk ordered to testify in election lottery cases; one lawsuit may be narrowed

    2026-06-25 19:45:54 UTC / Reuters

    By Jonathan Stempel

    June 25, 2026 7:45 PM UTC Updated 2 mins ago

    Elon Musk walks to attend the trial in his lawsuit over OpenAI for-profit conversion at a federal courthouse, in Oakland, California, U.S., April 29, 2026. REUTERS/Manuel Orbegozo/File Photo

    Companies

    Space Exploration Technologies Corp Follow
    Tesla Inc Follow

    June 25 (Reuters) – A federal judge ordered Elon Musk to testify under oath in two proposed class actions accusing him of defrauding voters in swing states before the ​2024 election by promising a $1 million-a-day giveaway.

    In a decision on Thursday, U.S. ‌Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower in Austin, Texas, also recommended that Musk and his political action committee America PAC face a claim in one of the lawsuits that they tricked voters into providing ​personal identifying information as part of the giveaway. She said a related breach ​of contract claim should be dismissed.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Musk’s lawyers did not immediately respond ⁠to requests for comment. Lawyers for the plaintiffs in both lawsuits did not immediately ​respond to similar requests or had no immediate comment.

    PLAINTIFFS SAY $1 MILLION WINNERS NOT RANDOM

    The ​respective plaintiffs Joy Harvick and Jacqueline McAferty, both from Arizona, said Musk and America PAC misled voters in seven swing states into signing his petition to support the U.S. Constitution, by promising that the $1 ​million recipients would be chosen “randomly” as in a lottery.

    They said voters had no ​real chance of winning and, quoting a Musk lawyer, said the 18 winners were chosen because they ‌might ⁠be good spokespeople for America PAC.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Musk founded America PAC to support Republican Donald Trump’s successful 2024 presidential run, and announced the giveaway at a Pennsylvania town hall that October.

    He is also the world’s richest person, whose businesses include electric car company Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab and rocket ​and satellite company SpaceX (SPCX.O), opens new tab.

    JUDGE ​SAYS IT IS ⁠UNCLEAR IF MUSK SPOKE RECKLESSLY

    In recommending that McAferty’s fraud claim continue, Hightower called it an open question whether Musk acted recklessly when ​he said payouts would be made “randomly.”

    The judge quoted America PAC ​Director Christopher ⁠Young testifying in a February 2026 deposition that he was “surprised” at Musk’s choice of words.

    “It was not the way that we had — you know, with legal counsel and consultation, discussed ⁠the ​program and how it would run,” Young said.

    U.S. District ​Judge Robert Pitman in Austin will review Hightower’s recommendations.

    blob:https://www.reuters.com/ca54afd7-dbe3-41ac-9f2e-4165d2e4a7d7

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-ordered-testify-election-lottery-cases-one-lawsuit-may-be-narrowed-2026-06-25/

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-ordered-testify-election-lottery-cases-one-lawsuit-may-be-narrowed-2026-06-25/

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-ordered-testify-election-lottery-cases-one-lawsuit-may-be-narrowed-2026-06-25/

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-ordered-testify-election-lottery-cases-one-lawsuit-may-be-narrowed-2026-06-25/

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-ordered-testify-election-lottery-cases-one-lawsuit-may-be-narrowed-2026-06-25/

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-ordered-testify-election-lottery-cases-one-lawsuit-may-be-narrowed-2026-06-25/

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/elon-musk-ordered-testify-election-lottery-cases-one-lawsuit-may-be-narrowed-2026-06-25/

    Musk and America PAC also want Harvick’s case dismissed. ​Pitman will decide their motion himself.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York Editing by Matthew Lewis

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

  • 国家公园管理局官员在法庭文件中称:倒影池被刀或剃须刀割破


    2026-06-25T13:56:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    华盛顿 — 国家公园管理局一名高级官员周四在一份法庭文件中表示,该局已于两周多前向当局报告了林肯纪念堂倒影池遭到锋利刀具破坏的情况。

    国家公园管理局运营副局长弗兰克·兰兹表示,该局已于6月9日向美国公园警察报告了这起破坏事件。此前特朗普总统将翻新工程表面剥落归咎于破坏者,而兰兹的声明是首次公开证实倒影池遭到人为破坏。本周早些时候,特朗普对记者称,国家公园管理局或内政部将在法庭上提供他所谓的池面涂层350英尺长切口的证据。

    兰兹在法庭文件中称:“2026年6月9日,在翻新工程基本完工后,美国公园警察接到国家公园管理局关于倒影池受损的报告,包括用锋利刀具或剃须刀割破泡沫密封胶上的填缝材料,以及分层表面材料遭到破坏。”“此外,约70根围栏柱顶被扔进池中。”

    兰兹于2023年就任现职,他声明自己对声明中所述事实有亲身了解,并愿意出庭作证。目前尚不清楚国家公园管理局掌握了何种证据。

    2026年6月23日,华盛顿特区,国民警卫队成员在近期翻新后的林肯纪念堂倒影池附近巡逻。亚伦·施瓦茨 / 路透社

    兰兹在文件中表示,公园管理局计划在独立日庆祝活动结束后再开始抽排水修复倒影池,而非提前。兰兹的声明是“文化景观基金会”针对内政部提起的诉讼的一部分,该诉讼与特朗普政府主导的倒影池涂装工程有关。

    本周早些时候,特朗普在接受哥伦比亚广播公司新闻高级白宫记者埃德·奥基夫采访时坚称,造成1470万美元密封胶工程后出现损坏的原因是破坏者,而非施工本身存在其他问题。池水还再次出现藻类大量繁殖的情况。

    2026年6月24日,林肯纪念堂倒影池池底蓝色涂层出现剥落。美联社照片/拉赫马特·古尔

    据美国公园警察消息,至少有5人因涉嫌与倒影池破坏事件相关的 vandalism 被捕,另有5人收到联邦传票。但相关证据细节尚未公开。

    “没错,到了合适的时机你们就会看到,”特朗普在谈及倒影池受损证据时说道,“你们会在法庭上看到的。你们会在法庭上看到,但你们只需致电公园管理局、致电内政部即可。”

    Reflecting Pool liner was cut with knife or razor, National Park Service official says in court filing

    2026-06-25T13:56:00-0400 / CBS News

    Washington — A top official with the National Park Service said in a court filing Thursday that the agency reported damage to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool caused by a sharp knife over two weeks ago.

    Frank Lands, deputy director for operations for the National Park Service, said the park service reported the damage on June 9 to the U.S. Park Police. Lands’ declaration is the first public record testifying to intentional damage of the pool, after President Trump blamed the renovated project’s peeling surface on vandals. The president told reporters earlier this week that the National Park Service or Interior Department would provide evidence in court of what he called a 350-foot gash to the pool’s coating.

    “On June 9, 2026, after the rehabilitation project was substantially complete, the U.S. Park Police responded to an NPS report of damage to the reflecting pool, including a caulk over the foam sealant that was cut with a sharp knife or razor and destruction of delaminating surface material,” Lands said in the court filing. “In addition, approximately 70 fence post tops were thrown into the pool.”

    Lands, who assumed his current role in 2023, declared he has personal knowledge of the facts stated in his declaration and is willing to testify in court. It’s not clear what kind of evidence the National Park Service has.

    Members of the National Guard patrol the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool after recent renovations in Washington, D.C., June 23, 2026. Aaron Schwartz / REUTERS

    Lands said in the filing that the park service plans to begin draining and repairing the pool after the Independence Day festivities, rather than before. Lands’ statement came about as a part of the Cultural Landscape Foundation’s lawsuit against the Interior Department over the president’s Reflecting Pool paint job.

    In an exchange with CBS News senior White House correspondent Ed O’Keefe earlier this week, Mr. Trump insisted that vandals, rather than other problems with the work, are responsible for the damage seen following the $14.7 million sealant job. The water has also been plagued by a resurgence of algae.

    Peeling is seen in the blue coating on the bottom of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool on June 24, 2026. AP Photo/Rahmat Gul

    At least five people have been arrested for alleged vandalism related to the Reflecting Pool, and five additional people were issued federal citations, according to the U.S. Park Police. But details of the evidence have not been released.

    “Yeah, at the right time you’ll see it,” Mr. Trump said of evidence of damage to the pool. “You’ll see it in court. You’ll see it in court, but all you have to do is call the Parks Department, call the Department of Interior.”

  • 鲁比奥对伊朗谅解备忘录的表态与特朗普、万斯截然不同


    2026-06-25T18:04:58.210Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/25/politics/marco-rubio-iran-agreement

    一周多以来,美国最高外交官一直刻意对一件本应属于其职责范围内的事态保持沉默:一份与伊朗达成的初步协议。

    这让不少人猜测,与其他保守派外交政策鹰派同僚一样,国务卿马可·鲁比奥可能对该协议心存疑虑。

    如今,鲁比奥终于公开表态了。但他的推销说辞与总统唐纳德·特朗普和副总统JD·万斯大相径庭。

    在访问中东盟友以争取支持、安抚盟友担忧的行程中,鲁比奥不仅未对这份饱受争议的谅解备忘录作出强有力的肯定,还就谅解备忘录的具体条款与和平进程发表了明显不同的论调。

    周四的一番表态便是明证,鲁比奥重申了其过往言论,将伊朗领导人称为“宗教……疯子”。

    “伊朗政权由神职人员领导——激进神职人员,”鲁比奥在访问巴林期间说道。“一直以来都是如此,现在依然如此。”

    但就在一周前,特朗普和万斯将伊朗描绘成可能已改弦易辙的形象,引发了诸多热议。

    事实上,特朗普明确驳斥了伊朗现任领导人“被激进化”的说法。

    “我们打交道的人,我认为都非常理性,”6月16日在法国举行的G7峰会上,特朗普说道。“他们很好打交道。他们是强大的人,聪明的人。……但他们并未被激进化,而且,你懂的,他们正致力于帮助自己的国家。”

    万斯抓住机会成为该协议的代言人,他同样暗示,伊朗可能对近50年来的反美外交政策有所悔悟。

    “这些谈判中有一点非常有意思——你会看到,无论是强硬派,还是更多政治人士,都在说,我们过去47年与美国的关系是个错误。让我们翻开新的篇章,”万斯说道。

    万斯和鲁比奥都在发言中留有余地,强调局势可能生变,唯有时间能证明伊朗的真实意图。

    但值得注意的是,这两位特朗普曾公开谈论其2028年竞选前景的高级官员,对德黑兰领导层的看法截然不同。

    这份谅解备忘录最令人费解的疏漏之一,就是未提及终止伊朗的导弹计划。这曾是特朗普政府在战争伊始就明确提出的目标之一,但备忘录对此只字未提。

    更蹊跷的是,特朗普上周明显软化了这一立场。他多次表示,伊朗至少应该被允许拥有一些导弹。

    “他们必须拥有一些,因为其他国家也有,”特朗普说道。他还补充称,“导弹不是问题”,因为“它们不会毁灭地球”。

    特朗普后来在谈及伊朗导弹计划时还表示:“相对而言,我认为这没问题。”

    但鲁比奥周三在与中东盟友会谈时则态度强硬得多——这些盟友对伊朗使用导弹深感担忧,这完全可以理解。他表示,美国政府与这些盟友立场一致,不会坐视伊朗威胁它们。

    “我们不会做任何损害我们盟友——该地区我们长期盟友——安全的事情,”当被问及伊朗使用导弹和无人机一事时,鲁比奥在科威特说道。

    特朗普政府最初提出的另一项未被列入谅解备忘录的目标,是终止伊朗对真主党、哈马斯等代理组织的支持。

    鲁比奥本周暗示,谅解备忘录在这方面的实际效力可能比表面看起来更强。

    他辩称,协议中关于伊朗、美国及其盟友将避免“任何相互敌对行动,并且不会对彼此威胁或使用武力”的条款,适用于伊朗对代理组织的支持。他表示,“仔细研读”谅解备忘录就能证明这一点。

    “只要伊朗代理组织从伊拉克发射导弹和无人机,像哈马斯和真主党那样参与恐怖活动,该地区的敌对行动和冲突就无法终结,”鲁比奥周二在阿布扎比说道。“因此,我确实认为这一点包含在谅解备忘录中。”

    万斯上周在接受CNN记者杰克·塔珀采访时也提出了类似观点。

    他表示,谅解备忘录的相关条款意味着“伊朗人必须停止资助暴力恐怖组织,停止资助地区动荡”。

    但特朗普的态度却并非如此坚定。

    事实上,上周在G7峰会上,特朗普似乎将代理组织问题与导弹问题一并归为后续待解决事项,作为他所谓“与海湾国家并行努力解决非核问题”的一部分。

    “我们还将谈论他们拥有的恐怖代理组织——我们不希望这种情况发生,”总统说道。

    几乎没有哪个问题像以色列与黎巴嫩真主党之间持续不断的冲突那样,危及到这项初步和平进程。

    在周二阿布扎比的新闻发布会上,鲁比奥表示,黎巴嫩局势与美伊和平进程是两码事。

    “嗯,这个进程是独立的,”鲁比奥说道。“它是独立的,因为黎巴嫩是一个主权国家。它有自己的政府。谈到黎巴嫩以及黎巴嫩国内正在发生的事情,我们将直接与黎巴嫩政府谈判达成协议。”

    但这与谅解备忘录的内容以及万斯的解释难以自洽。

    以色列和黎巴嫩政府都未参与这份谅解备忘录。但该协议据称会迫使美伊的“盟友”——这无疑包括以色列和真主党——参与“立即并永久终止所有战线的军事行动,包括黎巴嫩境内的行动”。

    上周在白宫简报会上被要求解释谅解备忘录中黎巴嫩相关条款时,万斯表示,该条款约束以色列和真主党。

    “这意味着我们期望真主党不会向以色列发射火箭和无人机。我们也期望以色列不会在黎巴嫩肆意行动,对吗?”万斯说道。“双方都必须履行协议中的义务。”

    特朗普和万斯上周还向以色列施加了巨大压力,要求其不要对真主党进行过度报复。他们甚至近乎隐晦地威胁,如果以色列的军事行动破坏了与伊朗的和平进程,就撤回美国对这个长期盟友的支持。

    但这一立场在保守派外交政策鹰派中引发了争议,他们认为政府实际上是在强迫以色列不要自卫反击真主党。

    于是鲁比奥站出来缓和局面。

    但目前尚不清楚他的说法是否真的代表了政府的立场。

    而随着他挺身而出公开表态,这种情况正变得越来越普遍。

    Rubio’s spin on the Iran MOU sounds different from Trump and Vance

    2026-06-25T18:04:58.210Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/25/politics/marco-rubio-iran-agreement

    For more than a week, America’s top diplomat was conspicuously quiet about something that would have seemed very much in his wheelhouse: a nascent agreement with Iran.

    This led plenty to surmise that Secretary of State Marco Rubio, like many of his fellow conservative foreign policy hawks, might have had misgivings about it.

    Well, now Rubio is actually speaking. But his sales pitch sounds quite a bit different from President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance.

    During visits with Middle Eastern allies to rally support and soothe fears, Rubio has not only avoided forceful affirmations of the controversial memorandum of understanding; he’s also sounded a significantly different tone about the particulars of the MOU and the peace process.

    A case in point came Thursday, when Rubio doubled down on his past statements labeling Iran’s leaders as “religious … lunatics.”

    “The Iranian system is led by clerics – radical clerics,” Rubio said during a visit to Bahrain. “That’s what it’s always been led by. And that’s what it continues to be led by.”

    But the comments came a week after Trump and Vance raised plenty of eyebrows by pitching the Iranians as potentially reformed.

    In fact, Trump expressly rejected the idea that its current leaders were “radicalized.”

    “We’re dealing with people that I think are very rational people,” Trump said June 16 at the G7 summit in France. “They were nice to deal with. They were strong people, smart people. … But they’re not radicalized, and they’re, you know, looking to help their country.”

    Vance, who jumped at the chance to be the face of the agreement, likewise suggested the Iranians might be having second thoughts about nearly five decades of anti-American foreign policy.

    “This is a very interesting thing about these negotiations – is you see people, both the hard-liners, but also the more political people, saying our relationship with the United States over the past 47 years has been a mistake. Let’s turn over a new leaf,” Vance said.

    Both Vance and Rubio tempered their comments by emphasizing that things could change and that time would tell what the Iranians’ true intentions are.

    But it’s notable that these top two officials — whose 2028 prospects Trump has openly mused about — offered very different takes on Tehran’s leadership.

    One of the most curious absences from the MOU was anything about ending Iran’s missile program. This had been one of the Trump administration’s stated goals at the start of the war, but the MOU was silent on it.

    Even more curiously, Trump seemed to walk that goal back significantly last week. He said repeatedly that Iran should be allowed to have at least some missiles.

    “They have to have some, because other people have some,” Trump said. He added that “missiles aren’t the problem” because “they don’t blow up the planet.”

    Trump later added of Iran’s missile program: “In relative proportion, I think it’s OK.”

    But Rubio on Wednesday suggested a much tougher line while speaking with Middle Eastern allies who are understandably quite concerned about Iran’s use of those missiles. He said the administration was aligned with those allies and wouldn’t let Iran threaten them.

    “We’re not going to do anything that undermines the security of our allies – our longstanding allies in the region,” Rubio said in Kuwait, when asked about Iran’s use of missiles and drones.

    Another of the Trump administration’s original goals that wasn’t spelled out in the MOU was ending Iran’s support for proxy groups like Hezbollah and Hamas.

    Rubio suggested this week that the MOU was stronger than it might have appeared on that front.

    He argued that the agreement’s statement that Iran, the US and their allies would avoid “any hostile action against each other, and will refrain from the threat or use of force against each other” applied to Iran’s support for the proxies. He said a “careful reading” of the MOU demonstrated that.

    “You can’t have the end of hostilities and conflicts in the region as long as Iranian proxies are launching missiles and drones from Iraq and are participating in terrorism like Hamas did and like Hezbollah did,” Rubio said Tuesday in Abu Dhabi. “So I do think it’s covered by the MOU.”

    Vance offered a version of this same argument last week in an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper.

    He said that that part of the MOU meant that “Iranians have to stop funding violent terrorist organizations, they have to stop funding regional instability.”

    But Trump hasn’t been so firm.

    In fact, at the G7 last week, Trump seemed to lump the proxy issue in with missiles as something to be dealt with later, as part of what he called “a parallel effort with the Gulf nations to address non-nuclear issues.”

    “And we’ll talk also about the terrorist proxies that they have that – we don’t want that to happen,” the president said.

    Few issues jeopardize the nascent peace process like ongoing fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

    In the Tuesday press conference in Abu Dhabi, Rubio indicated the peace process there would be distinct from the US-Iran peace process.

    “Well, that process is separate,” Rubio said. “It’s separate, because Lebanon is a sovereign country. It has a government. And when it comes to Lebanon and what’s happening inside of Lebanon, we’re going to negotiate a deal directly with the Lebanese government.”

    But that’s difficult to square with the MOU and Vance’s explanation of it.

    Neither Israel nor the Lebanese government was party to the MOU. But the agreement purported to force US and Iranian “allies” — which would surely include Israel and Hezbollah — to participate in the “immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon.”

    When asked to explain the Lebanon component of the MOU at a White House briefing last week, Vance suggested it bound Israel and Hezbollah.

    “What that means is we expect Hezbollah is not going to be firing rockets and firing drones at the Israelis. And we also expect that the Israelis are not going to be going wild in Lebanon, right?” Vance said. “Both sides have to honor their end of the deal.”

    Trump and Vance last week also applied significant pressure on Israel not to retaliate against Hezbollah too hard. They even seemed to not-so-subtly threaten to pull US support for its longtime ally if its military actions ruined the peace process with Iran.

    But that stance was problematic with conservative foreign policy hawks, who thought the administration was effectively trying to force Israel not to defend itself against Hezbollah.

    So up steps Rubio to smooth things over.

    But it’s not clear that his version is actually the administration’s posture.

    And as he steps forward to speak out, that’s becoming a trend.

  • 记者手记:美国国会议员争论人工智能能否胜任课堂教学


    2026年6月25日 美国东部时间下午2:53 / 福克斯新闻

    教育工作者警告称,此前匆忙将技术引入课堂并未改善学习成果

    作者:查德·珀格拉姆 福克斯新闻

    福克斯新闻近期的一项民调凸显了民众观念的转变:52%的选民如今认为大型科技公司对美国未来的威胁大于大型政府,持该观点的选民占比为47%。美国参议院一个委员会还就人工智能在课堂的兴起展开讨论,议题包括其对学生学习的影响、隐私担忧以及对美国劳动力市场的潜在影响。议员们正在制定人工智能监管框架。

    新功能:您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    阅读、写作与人工智能算法。

    美国参议院目前正在探讨学生和教师该如何在课堂上使用人工智能。

    这已是大势所趋。

    “问题不在于人工智能是否会影响教育,真正的问题在于我们能否深思熟虑、负责任地引导其应用,”特拉华州教育部长辛迪·马滕在近期的参议院听证会上说道。

    议员们不仅关注人工智能教给学生什么,更关注其教学方式。

    “我们对这项技术的长期认知影响有多少了解?”参议院议员汤米·塔伯维尔(阿拉巴马州共和党)在听证会上问道。

    学校转而采用手写考试,AI作弊现象激增

    2026年2月10日,美国参议员汤米·塔伯维尔(阿拉巴马州共和党)在华盛顿特区返回国会办公室时接受记者采访。(凯文·迪奇/盖蒂图片社摄)

    “我们尚无关于其对社交或认知发展长期影响的因果研究,”InnovateEDU及EDSAFE AI联盟首席执行官艾琳·莫特回应道,该组织致力于课堂技术创新。

    大约12年前,在课堂上向学生普及电子屏幕、iPad和Chromebook笔记本电脑曾风靡一时。但据美国国家教育进展评估(NEAP,俗称“国家成绩单”)的数据,自那次技术热潮以来,高中高年级学生数学和阅读达到年级水平的比例较2009年下降了4个百分点。

    “学生并未更好地掌握学习内容,他们的社交和情感健康也受到了严重影响。我们在推进人工智能教学及使用人工智能教学时,必须确保不会过度依赖技术,批判性思维技能仍然至关重要,”瓦尔多斯塔州立大学的大卫·斯莱克维斯在今年早些时候的众议院听证会上说道。

    这也是议员们对人工智能能否提升课堂表现持怀疑态度的原因。

    “孩子们已经将批判性思考、交友甚至寻求道德建议都外包给了人工智能,”康涅狄格州民主党参议员克里斯·墨菲说道。

    95%的教师表示:AI让学生对学习技术产生危险依赖:民调

    2025年7月23日,康涅狄格州民主党参议员克里斯·墨菲在国会大厦投票结束后接受记者采访。(比尔·克拉克/CQ-滚呼公司摄)

    此外还存在隐私担忧。人工智能可以收集每个学生的学习情况和知识储备。

    人工智能可以获取学生学过哪些课程、掌握不同概念的速度等信息。人工智能或数据经纪商可能会跟踪这些信息数十年,即便学生升入大学乃至进入职场。

    “这些工具获取的学生信息越来越多,甚至可能连我们都没意识到,”马滕警告道。

    教师们已经在借助人工智能制定课程计划和批改作业。小学教师当然可以利用人工智能批改简单的乘法题和拼写作业。但如果教师或教授使用人工智能评分标准来批改创意写作、学期论文这类主观性作业,可能会引发严重问题。

    “一旦开始使用人工智能,人们往往会轻信其输出的所有内容,这会造成严重隐患,”参议院听证会上的QuantHub(一家教育人工智能素养公司)首席执行官约书亚·琼斯说道。

    部分议员怀疑人工智能能否胜任所有教学任务,教育的某些方面难以被复制。

    “儿童与教师之间的基础关系是人工智能无法复刻的,也无法被取代,”弗吉尼亚州民主党参议员蒂姆·凯恩说道。

    为何古典教育或许是人类在人工智能时代未来的关键

    2025年11月6日,弗吉尼亚州民主党参议员蒂姆·凯恩在国会大厦参议院民主党核心小组午餐会外接受记者采访。(比尔·克拉克/盖蒂图片社摄)

    教育工作者想知道人工智能将如何改变他们的角色,以及未来“教师”或“教授”的概念是否与如今人们的认知一致。

    “对于那些认为教学就该如此的教师来说,这种转变可能相当可怕。但我们知道,这并非高效的教学或学习方式。因此,这需要整个教育生态系统做出真正的变革,”曾撰写过人工智能相关文章的教育工作者艾米丽·谢金说道。

    今年春季,全美多地毕业典礼上,即将毕业的大学生对多位科技公司首席执行官发出了阵阵嘘声。原因何在?这些学生或许拿到了毕业证,但他们怀疑仅凭文凭能否在人工智能时代找到待遇优厚的工作。

    OpenAI首席执行官萨姆·奥尔特曼近期在国会大厦与两党多名议员会面,讨论了他们对人工智能的期望与担忧。

    “我理解大学生对未来充满焦虑,”奥尔特曼说道,“我认为未来会有大量工作岗位。我认为人工智能对就业的影响比我们行业内许多人预期的要小,但这并不意味着未来也会一直如此。”

    此外,如果学生因人工智能找不到工作,他们可能会质疑教育的价值。

    “(高中高年级学生)表示他们找不到工作,称30%至40%的人处于失业状态,并将此归咎于人工智能,”密苏里州共和党议员乔希·霍利说道,“我们必须对人工智能做出一些选择,确保它确实对美国劳动力市场有益。我认为很多大学毕业生并不这么认为。”

    新组织警告:对儿童和劳动者的人工智能风险上升速度快于监管

    2026年1月7日,美国密苏里州共和党众议员乔希·霍利抵达国会大厦参加参议员闭门简报会,华盛顿特区。(安娜·莫尼梅克/盖蒂图片社摄)

    霍利认为国会应该就人工智能采取行动,但方式可能与外界预期不同。

    “我们现在就应该通过立法,要求这些科技公司披露其创造了多少就业岗位,或是摧毁了多少就业岗位,”霍利说道。

    加州共和党众议员杰伊·奥伯诺尔特是国会中人工智能议题的主要发声者之一。他近期协助起草了两党联合的人工智能监管立法框架。奥伯诺尔特表示,他理解大学生的担忧。

    “这表明我们整体上在向美国公众阐明人工智能部署的积极前景方面做得非常糟糕,”奥伯诺尔特说道,“人工智能可能会成为我们有史以来发明的最强大的提升人类生产力的工具,这不仅会对我国乃至全球经济产生积极影响,还将创造一波繁荣浪潮,让所有人都能从中获益。”

    众议院议长迈克·约翰逊(路易斯安那州共和党)希望在今年年底前通过一项人工智能监管法案。但国会日程格外紧张。本周众议院提前一天休会。由于《拯救美国法案》——一项要求选民提供公民身份证明的共和党法案——引发争议,下周的日程甚至可能生变。

    但目前尚不清楚法案将如何解决课堂人工智能的具体问题。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    这意味着人工智能可能会在小学、中学乃至高等教育中不受约束地发展。

    除非议员们迅速行动,否则人工智能可能会给我们所有人“上一课”。

    查德·珀格拉姆目前担任福克斯新闻频道(FNC)首席国会通讯员。他于2007年9月加入该电视台,总部位于华盛顿特区。

    Reporter’s Notebook: Lawmakers wrestle over whether AI can make the grade in America’s classrooms

    June 25, 2026 2:53pm EDT / Fox News

    Educators warn that a previous rush to add technology to the classroom failed to improve learning outcomes

    By Chad Pergram Fox News

    A recent Fox News poll highlights changing perceptions as 52% of voters now consider Big Tech a greater threat to the U.S. future compared to Big Government’s 47%. A Senate panel also discusses the rise of artificial intelligence in classrooms, debating its impact on student learning, privacy concerns, and potential effects on the American workforce. Lawmakers are working on an AI regulation framework.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Reading. Writing. And AI algorithms.

    The Senate is now wrestling with how students — and teachers — might use Artificial Intelligence in the classroom.

    It’s inevitable.

    “The question is not whether AI is going to impact education. The real question is whether we will shape its use thoughtfully. Responsibly,” said Delaware Secretary of Education Cindy Marten during a recent Senate hearing.

    Lawmakers are focusing not just on what AI teaches students. But how.

    “What do we know when it comes to long term cognitive impact of the use of this technology?” asked Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., at the hearing.

    SCHOOLS TURN TO HANDWRITTEN EXAMS AS AI CHEATING SURGES

    U.S. Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., speaks to reporters as he returns to his office at the U.S. Capitol on Feb. 10, 2026 in Washington, D.C.(Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

    “We have no causal studies on long term impact on social or cognitive development,” replied Erin Mote, who, as CEO of InnovateEDU and the EDSAFE AI Alliance, works on technological innovation in the classroom.

    Pushing students onto screens, iPads and Chromebooks in the classroom was all the rage about 12 years ago. But since that rush to technology, the percentage of high school seniors performing at grade level in math and reading is down four points from 2009, according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NEAP), sometimes known as the report card of the nation.

    “The students did not learn the content better and their social and emotional health has suffered greatly. We need to ensure as we move forward teaching about and with AI that we do not become overly tech reliant and that critical thinking skills remain imperative” said David Slykhuis of Valdosta State University at a House hearing earlier this year.

    That’s why lawmakers are skeptical that AI can boost classroom performance.

    “Kids have outsourced critical thinking. Have outsourced friendship. Have even outsourced moral advice to AI,” said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn.

    95% OF FACULTY SAY AI MAKING STUDENTS DANGEROUSLY DEPENDENT ON TECHNOLOGY FOR LEARNING: SURVEY

    Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., speaks to a reporter after a vote in the U.S. Capitol on July 23, 2025.(Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc)

    There are also privacy concerns. AI can glean what each student learns and knows.

    AI could harvest what lessons they’ve covered. How fast students picked up different concepts. AI or data brokers could then track that for decades as students head to college or even enter the workforce.

    “These tools are getting more access to more information about our students that we may not even be aware of,” warned Marten.

    Teachers are already leaning on AI to develop lesson plans and grade papers. Elementary teachers can certainly deploy AI to grade simple multiplication tables and spelling. But it could spell trouble if teachers or professors use an AI rubric to grade subjective assignments such as creative writing or a term paper.

    “For those that start using AI, there’s a tendency to trust everything that it spits out that can create serious problems,” said Joshua Jones at the Senate hearing. He’s CEO of QuantHub, an education AI literacy firm.

    Some lawmakers doubt that AI can do everything. And some aspects of education are hard to copy.

    “The foundational relationship between a child and a teacher is not something that AI is going to recreate. It’s not something that I will substitute for,” said Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va.

    WHY A CLASSICAL EDUCATION MAY BE THE KEY TO HUMANITY’S FUTURE IN THE AI ERA

    Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., speaks to reporters outside the Senate Democrats caucus lunch meeting at the U.S. Capitol on Nov. 6, 2025.(Bill Clark/Getty Images)

    Educators want to know how AI may shift their roles. And if the concept of a “teacher” or a “professor,” tomorrow is the same as what we think of today.

    “The idea of pulling that away is probably really scary to teachers who think this is what teaching looks like. But we know that it’s not an effective way for teaching or for learning. And so it’s going to require some real ecosystem shifts,” said educator Emily Cherkin, who has written about AI.

    Graduating college seniors showered several tech CEOs with a chorus of boos at commencement exercises around the country this spring. The reason? These students may have earned a diploma. But they wonder if that’s sufficient for gainful employment in the age of AI.

    OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently met with a host of bipartisan lawmakers at the Capitol about their hopes and fears about AI.

    “I understand that college students have a lot of anxiety about the future,” said Altman. “I think there will be a lot of jobs in the future. I think that the impact on jobs has been less than many people in our field expected. And it doesn’t mean that it will always stay that way in the future.”

    Moreover, students may question the value of an education if they can’t get work due to artificial intelligence.

    “(High school seniors) were saying that they can’t find jobs. Saying that 30 to 40 percent of them are unemployed and they blame AI for this,” said Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo. “We’ve got to make some choices about AI to make sure it actually is good for the American workforce. And I think a lot college grads don’t think it is.”

    AI RISKS TO KIDS, WORKERS RISING FASTER THAN REGULATION, NEW GROUP WARNS

    FILE – U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) arrives to a closed door briefing with senators at the U.S. Capitol on January 7, 2026 in Washington, DC.(Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

    Hawley believes Congress should take action on AI. But not in the ways you might think.

    “We ought to pass legislation right now that would require these tech companies to turn over the data on how many jobs they’re creating or how many they’re destroying,” said Hawley.

    Rep. Jay Obernolte, R-Calif., is one of the leading voices in Congress on AI. He recently helped draft a bipartisan framework for legislation to regulate AI. Obernolte says he hears what college students are saying.

    “It’s an indication that we collectively have done a terrible job at articulating to the American public the optimistic case for AI deployment,” said Obernolte. “AI will probably be the most powerful tool for enhancing human productivity that we have ever invented. And that will not only have positive economic consequences for our country and our world, but could create this rising wave of prosperity that literally lifts all the boats.”

    House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., wants to pass an AI regulation bill by the end of the year. But the Congressional calendar is especially clogged. The House skipped out of town a day early this week. Even next week’s schedule may be in jeopardy thanks to a dispute over the SAVE America Act. That’s the GOP bill requiring proof of citizenship to vote.

    But it’s unclear how a bill may address the specifics of AI in the classroom.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    That means AI may continue unbridled in primary, secondary and even collegiate education.

    And unless lawmakers move fast, AI may school us all.

    Chad Pergram currently serves as Chief Congressional Correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC). He joined the network in September 2007 and is based out of Washington, D.C.

  • 特朗普最新宣布进入紧急状态再次让共和党盟友手足无措


    2026年6月25日 美国东部时间下午1:43 / 《华盛顿邮报》

    众议院议长迈克·约翰逊在总统取消住房法案签署仪式的次日前往白宫,将该仪式作为他认为紧急的选举立法的谈判筹码。

    image
    众议院议长迈克·约翰逊(路易斯安那州共和党人)于6月14日在UFC Freedom 250赛事前抵达白宫。(亚历克斯·布兰登/美联社)

    作者:克利夫·R·伍特森小 西奥多里克·迈尔

    众议院议长迈克·约翰逊(路易斯安那州共和党人)已安排周四下午紧急前往白宫,试图解开唐纳德·特朗普总统突然取消两党可负担住房法案签署仪式所引发的僵局。

    Trump’s latest declaration of an emergency leaves GOP allies scrambling again

    June 25, 2026 at 1:43 p.m. EDT / The Washington Post

    House Speaker Mike Johnson heads to the White House a day after the president canceled a signing ceremony for a housing bill, using it as leverage for elections legislation he deems urgent.

    House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) arrives at the White House ahead of the UFC Freedom 250 event on June 14. (Alex Brandon/AP)

    By Cleve R. Wootson Jr. and Theodoric Meyer

    House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) has scheduled a rush visit to the White House on Thursday afternoon to try to unsnarl the knot created when President Donald Trump abruptly canceled a signing ceremony for a bipartisan affordable housing bill.

  • 特朗普痴迷《拯救美国法案》致国会陷入僵局


    2026-06-25T15:17:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    作者:凯特琳·伊莱克 政治记者
    凯特琳·伊莱克是哥伦比亚广播公司新闻网驻华盛顿特区的政治记者。她曾供职于《华盛顿考察家报》和《国会山报》,并入选美国国家新闻基金会2022年保罗·米勒华盛顿报道奖学金项目。

    阅读完整简历

    更新时间:2026年6月25日 / 美国东部时间下午3:20 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    在谷歌上添加哥伦比亚广播公司

    华盛顿——总统特朗普与众议院保守派议员正挟持国会,施压参议院共和党人通过一项名为《拯救美国法案》的选举监管法案。

    特朗普周三突然取消了一项两党在参众两院均获压倒性支持的标志性住房负担能力法案的签署仪式,再次试图将无关立法作为政治筹码,迫使国会通过颇具争议的选举要求,比如出示公民身份证明以及限制邮寄选票。

    众议院此前通过了该法案的非全面版本,得到了少数民主党议员的支持。但此后特朗普要求加入其他共和党优先议题,比如禁止邮寄选票以及跨性别运动员参加女子体育赛事的条款。参议院共和党领袖多次表示,该法案无法获得通过所需的60票门槛支持,无法在参议院推进。

    但这并未阻止特朗普的尝试。他今年早些时候威胁称,除非国会通过《拯救美国法案》,否则不会签署其他多数法案。本月早些时候,特朗普拒绝重新授权一项无证监视权限——该权限是他每日安全简报中大部分情报的来源——除非将该选举法案附加其中。该权限至今仍未获得重新授权。

    周三,就在他即将签署一项数十年来首部全面住房负担能力法案的数小时前——此时住房问题正是众多美国人最关心的议题——特朗普再次要求优先推进《拯救美国法案》。他表示,除非议员们通过他的这项政治宠儿提案,否则不会将住房法案签署为法律。

    在保守派的支持下,特朗普要求参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩争取到足够票数通过该法案,或修改参议院规则以达成目标。但来自南达科他州的共和党人图恩明确表示,参议院共和党人也不会支持修改规则这一选项。尽管如此,共和党领袖仍试图回应保守派的诉求,包括今年早些时候就该法案进行马拉松式的全院辩论,给议员们机会阐述各自立场。

    “正如你所知,我们多次表明我们没有足够票数。但显然他并不希望我们得出这个结论,”图恩周三说道。

    阿拉斯加州共和党参议员丽莎·穆尔科斯基重申了这一观点,并认为特朗普的坚持只会阻碍他自己的议程。

    “如果他因为想要在《拯救美国法案》上有所作为而搁置自己的议程,我想那是他的选择。但这对他毫无帮助,”她周三说道。“这毫无进展。先生,如果你没有足够票数,那就是没有足够票数。”

    众议院议长迈克·约翰逊周四下午在白宫与特朗普会面,讨论后续推进路径。在离开美国国会大厦前,这位路易斯安那州共和党人表示,他期待这场关于“如何重新推动议程”的会议“富有成效”。

    周四上午的新闻发布会上,众议院保守派自由核心小组的成员们抨击参议院休会至7月13日,而非留在华盛顿为特朗普的首要立法优先事项寻找解决方案。参议院原计划接下来两周休假,并提前一天开始假期。

    “参议院太糟糕了,”佛罗里达州共和党众议员拜伦·唐纳兹说道。

    宾夕法尼亚州共和党众议员斯科特·佩里要求参议院恢复工作,并表示众议院议员们将留在华盛顿“尽一切所能”推动该法案送达特朗普面前。

    “我们已经完成了自己的工作,但如果还有更多事情要做,上帝保佑,我们会留下来,哪怕苦熬,”他说道。

    讲话结束后不久,众议院共和党领导层取消了周五的投票,并宣布周四下午仅举行一场投票。众议院目前计划下周大部分时间都处于议事状态,随后从7月3日至7月13日休会。

    但由佛罗里达州共和党众议员安娜·保利娜·卢纳领导的保守派议员实际上已暂停了众议院全院的立法行动,除非《拯救美国法案》在参议院获得通过。凭借微弱的多数优势,众议院共和党领导层需要几乎所有本党议员在党派程序性投票中团结一致,才能推进其立法议程。

    “在我看来,在这项法案通过之前,我不想对任何其他法案投赞成票,”南卡罗来纳州共和党众议员拉尔夫·诺曼周四说道。“我不会为任何其他法案投票。”

    “有人说我们可以通过预算协调程序纳入《拯救美国法案》——这根本行不通,”卢纳说道。

    本届国会期间,共和党已两次利用预算协调程序以党派票数通过立法。该程序允许多数党无需跨党派支持,便可通过具有直接预算影响的立法,将参议院通常需要的60票门槛降至简单多数即可推进。但该程序有严格要求,多名共和党人对利用该策略通过选举法案的可能性表示怀疑。

    卢纳敦促约翰逊 instead 将该选举监管法案附加到《国防授权法案》或特朗普此前提及的关键间谍权限延期法案——即《外国情报监控法》第702条——之上。

    约翰逊表示,他认为《拯救美国法案》的最佳推进路径是将其附加到第三份预算协调法案中。周三,他提议设立一个与协调程序挂钩的“拨款项目”,供各州利用以落实选举相关条款。

    德克萨斯州共和党众议员奇普·罗伊表示,他对“缩水版法案”不感兴趣,并怀疑如果将选举法案附加到党派支出法案中,其结果会比当前情况更好。

    “我们需要完整通过《拯救美国法案》,”罗伊说道。

    总统似乎也对这一想法不屑一顾。周三被问及是否会接受通过协调程序纳入《拯救美国法案》的相关条款时,特朗普回应道:“不太会,不会。”

    易卜拉欣·阿克索伊对本文亦有贡献。

    Trump’s obsession with SAVE America Act drives Congress into a standoff

    2026-06-25T15:17:00-0400 / CBS News

    By Caitlin Yilek Politics Reporter
    Caitlin Yilek is a politics reporter at CBSNews.com, based in Washington, D.C. She previously worked for the Washington Examiner and The Hill, and was a member of the 2022 Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellowship with the National Press Foundation.

    Read Full Bio

    Updated on: June 25, 2026 / 3:20 PM EDT / CBS News

    Add CBS News on Google

    Washington — President Trump and House conservatives are holding Congress hostage over Senate Republicans’ inability to pass a voting regulations bill known as the SAVE America Act.

    Mr. Trump abruptly canceled a signing ceremony Wednesday for a landmark housing affordability bill that has overwhelming bipartisan support in both chambers, seeking once again to use unrelated legislation as political leverage in his push to get Congress to adopt controversial voting requirements, such as showing proof of citizenship and restrictions on mail-in ballots.

    The House has passed earlier versions of the bill that aren’t as sweeping, with support from a handful of Democrats. But the president has since requested to add other Republican priorities, like bans on mail-in voting and transgender athletes’ participation in women’s sports. Senate Republican leaders have repeatedly said the bill does not have the support to reach the 60-vote threshold to advance in the upper chamber.

    That hasn’t stopped the president from trying. He threatened earlier this year not to sign most other bills until Congress passed the SAVE America Act. Earlier this month, Mr. Trump refused to reauthorize a warrantless surveillance authority that is the source of the bulk of the intelligence in his daily security briefing unless the election bill was attached. It still has not been reauthorized.

    And on Wednesday, hours before he was set to sign a bill that marked the first comprehensive housing affordability legislation in decades — a bill that came as the issue is top of mind for many Americans — the president again demanded that the SAVE America Act be prioritized. He said he would not sign the housing legislation into law until lawmakers pass his political pet project.

    Backed by conservatives, Mr. Trump has demanded that Senate Majority Leader John Thune find the votes to pass the legislation, or change the Senate’s rules to make it happen. But Thune, a South Dakota Republican, has made it clear that Senate Republicans won’t support that option either. Still, GOP leaders have tried to address interest from conservatives, including by allowing a marathon floor debate on the measure earlier this year aimed at giving members a chance to make their case.

    “We’ve made the point a number of times, as you know, that we don’t have the votes. But that’s not a conclusion obviously he would like to see us draw,” Thune said Wednesday.

    GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska reiterated the point and argued the president’s insistence is only obstructing his own agenda.

    “If he chooses to hold up his own agenda because he wants action on the SAVE Act, that’s, I guess, his call. It is not helpful to him,” she said Wednesday. “It’s not moving the needle. If you don’t have the votes, sir, you don’t have the votes.”

    House Speaker Mike Johnson was meeting with Mr. Trump at the White House on Thursday afternoon about the path forward. Before leaving the U.S. Capitol, the Louisiana Republican said he expected a “productive” meeting about “how to get the agenda moving again.”

    In a news conference Thursday morning, members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus railed against the Senate for recessing until July 13, instead of staying in Washington to find a path forward on one of Mr. Trump’s top legislative priorities. The Senate was previously scheduled to be off the next two weeks and left a day early for the break.

    “The Senate sucks,” said GOP Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida.

    GOP Rep. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania demanded that the Senate return to work, saying they would stay in town “and do whatever it takes” to get the legislation to Mr. Trump’s desk.

    “We have done our job, but if there’s more to do, God bless it, we will stay and suffer through it,” he said.

    Shortly after the remarks, House GOP leadership canceled Friday votes and announced just one vote Thursday afternoon. The House is currently scheduled to be in session for most of next week and then on break from July 3 until July 13.

    But conservatives, led by GOP Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, have effectively shut down legislative action on the House floor until the SAVE America Act passes the Senate. With their narrow majority, House GOP leaders need nearly all of their members to stick together in party-line procedural votes to advance their legislation.

    “From my standpoint, I don’t want to vote on anything else until this is passed,” GOP Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina said Thursday. “I’m not voting for anything.”

    “The fact that they’re trying to say that we can put the SAVE America Act in reconciliation — it cannot be done,” Luna said.

    Republicans have used the budget reconciliation process twice in this Congress to approve party-line legislation. The process allows the party in the majority to approve legislation with direct budgetary consequences without support from across the aisle, lowering the Senate’s typical 60-vote threshold to a simple majority to advance. But the process has strict requirements, and a number of Republicans have cast doubt on the ability to use the maneuver to approve the elections legislation.

    Luna has urged Johnson instead to attach the voting regulations bill to the National Defense Authorization Act or an extension of a key spy authority known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which Mr. Trump previously suggested.

    Johnson said he believes the best path forward for the SAVE America Act is attaching it to a third budget reconciliation bill. On Wednesday, he pitched the creation of a “grant program” tied to reconciliation that states could draw from to implement elections provisions.

    GOP Rep. Chip Roy of Texas said he’s not interested in “a watered-down version” and was doubtful that the elections measure would see a different outcome than its current fortune if attached to a party-line spending bill.

    “We need the entirety of the SAVE America Act passed,” Roy said.

    And the president also seemed to dismiss the idea. Asked Wednesday whether he would be open to provisions of the SAVE America Act in a reconciliation measure, Mr. Trump responded, “Not really, no.”

    Ibrahim Aksoy contributed to this report.

  • 特朗普政府认定超500名移民儿童将被驱逐出境,参议员透露


    2026-06-25T16:00:25.510Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    据民主党参议员罗恩·怀登透露,特朗普政府已认定美国政府羁押的超500名无人陪伴移民儿童可能被驱逐出境。

    此举标志着特朗普政府针对那些独自抵达美国南部边境、目前正处于羁押状态等待被安置到美国担保人(通常为父母或亲属)家中的移民儿童的行动进一步升级。

    此前,该政府曾试图将美国政府羁押的、独自入境且在美国境内无父母的危地马拉儿童遣返,但该计划被一名联邦法官叫停。

    如今一场类似的行动似乎正在推进——此次行动的目标是那些已被羁押至少六个月、且在美国境内无亲属或监护人的儿童。

    “这是一起严重的体制性失误,将数百名脆弱儿童置于直接危险之中,实际上剥夺了他们受美国监管保护的权利,并将他们重新推入险境,”怀登在写给卫生与公众服务部部长小罗伯特·F·肯尼迪的信中说道。

    “将负责保护这些儿童的机构武器化,是对行政权过度扩张的不可接受的升级,破坏了我国对正当法律程序的承诺,”他补充道。目前尚不清楚所有被认定的儿童是否会被迅速驱逐。

    这位俄勒冈州参议员同时也是负责监督难民安置办公室的参议院财政委员会的 ranking 成员(即少数党首席成员),他要求立即暂停“任何筛查计划和计划中的驱逐行动”,并要求提供有关该行动的更多信息。

    卫生与公众服务部发言人在一份声明中表示:“尽管存在这种不负责任的危言耸听,但我们并没有计划针对这些儿童。拜登政府在未对担保人进行充分审查的情况下匆忙释放这些儿童,导致数千名儿童面临虐待、剥削和人口贩运的风险。特朗普政府正努力确认我们所羁押的无人陪伴外籍儿童的父母或法定监护人,因为确保每个儿童都被安置到经过适当审查的担保人家中是我们的首要任务。”

    隶属于卫生与公众服务部的难民安置办公室负责照料独自抵达美国南部边境的移民儿童。这些儿童通常为逃离本国的危险处境,往往试图与已在美国境内的父母、亲属或监护人团聚或被安置到他们身边。

    怀登所提及的名单上的儿童被归类为在美国境内无担保人,且“主要被全国范围内的难民安置办公室提供商安置在长期寄养家庭中”。他们均已被羁押至少180天。

    根据联邦数据,截至5月,难民安置办公室羁押的无人陪伴儿童平均数量为1816名。其中大多数来自中美洲。

    目前尚不清楚这些儿童的年龄,以及政府计划通过何种移民程序驱逐他们。特朗普政府官员此前曾将遣返危地马拉儿童的行动描述为遣返,称此举是与危地马拉政府协调并应其请求开展的。

    “此举旨在让儿童回到他们的家人和父母身边,而非让他们通过未经核实的担保人或身份不合法的担保人留在美国,”一位前卫生与公众服务部高级官员在接受CNN采访时谈及他们本国的家人时说道。

    据这位前高级官员透露,近几个月来,难民安置办公室一直在识别羁押中可能被驱逐出境的未成年人,除非他们正在申请特定的保护身份。

    与移民儿童合作的移民权益倡导者和律师们对儿童被送回他们原本逃离的环境发出了警告。他们认为,将儿童遣返回本国并不总是符合他们的最大利益。

    无人陪伴移民儿童需经过移民程序,以确定鉴于其本国的情况,他们是否有资格在美国获得救济。据怀登称,在被认定的500多名未成年人中,大多数在移民诉讼中都有法律代表。

    “本届政府一再证明,它并未将儿童的最大利益放在心上。虽然我们目前尚不清楚他们的具体计划,但我们知道,在对待这群极其脆弱的儿童时,他们愿意冷酷无情、无视法律地采取行动,”全国青年法律中心儿童人权与尊严事务主管妮哈·德赛在一份声明中说道。

    去年,该政府试图将羁押中的危地马拉儿童遣返回国的行动引发了律师们的一片混乱,他们称孩子们在半夜被叫醒。当时,76名儿童已准备好被遣返并被送上起飞的飞机,但在一名联邦法官下令暂时阻止驱逐后,他们突然被送回美国羁押场所。

    该政府辩称,他们已与危地马拉政府协调,且这些儿童的父母或法定监护人已提出让他们回国的请求。此案中提交的法庭文件显示,部分父母并未要求孩子回国,且他们是在最后一刻才被告知此事。

    “我获取的新信息表明,该部门正在为另一场违法的驱逐行动奠定基础,这一次规模更大,涉及更多原籍国,”怀登说道。

    Trump administration identifies more than 500 migrant children for removal from the US, senator says

    2026-06-25T16:00:25.510Z / CNN

    The Trump administration has identified more than 500 unaccompanied migrant children in US government custody to be potentially removed from the country, according to Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden.

    The move marks the latest escalation of the Trump administration’s effort to focus on migrant children who arrived at the US southern border alone and are in custody awaiting to be placed with a sponsor, typically a parent or relative, in the United States.

    The administration previously tried to repatriate Guatemalan children in government custody who arrived in the United States alone and didn’t have a parent in the country, but that was stopped by a federal judge.

    A similar effort appears to be underway now – this time, focusing on children who have been in custody for at least six months and don’t have a relative or guardian in the United States.

    “This is a severe institutional failure that places hundreds of vulnerable children in immediate jeopardy, effectively erasing them from the protection of U.S. oversight and thrusting them back into danger,” Wyden said in a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

    “To weaponize the very agency charged with their protection is an unacceptable escalation of executive overreach that undermines our nation’s commitment to due process,” he added. It’s unclear whether all the identified children will be swiftly removed.

    The Oregon senator, who serves as ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee which has oversight over the Office of Refugee Resettlement, demanded the immediate suspension of “any screening initiative and planned removal action,” as well as additional information on the effort.

    In a statement, an HHS spokesperson said: “Despite this irresponsible fearmongering, there are no plans to target these children. The Biden administration rushed the release of these children without adequate sponsor vetting, leaving thousands vulnerable to abuse, exploitation, and trafficking. The Trump Administration is working to identify the parents or legal guardians of unaccompanied alien children in our care because ensuring every child is placed with a properly vetted sponsor is our top priority.”

    ORR, which is housed within HHS, is charged with the care of migrant children who arrive at the US southern border alone. Those children, who are typically fleeing dangerous conditions at home, are often trying to reunite or be placed with a parent, relative or guardian already in the United States.

    The children on the list described by Wyden are categorized as having no sponsor in the US and were “mainly placed in long-term foster care with ORR providers” nationwide. They’ve all been in custody for at least 180 days.

    As of May, there was an average of 1,816 unaccompanied children in ORR custody, according to federal data. The majority are from Central America.

    It’s unclear how old the children are and what immigration process the administration plans to use to remove the children. Trump administration officials had previously described the attempt to remove Guatemalan children as repatriations, citing coordination and requests from the Guatemalan government.

    “The attempt is to have children back with their families and parents, not to be put into the United States with unverified sponsors or sponsors who are not lawfully present,” a former senior HHS official told CNN, referring to family in their home countries.

    Over recent months, ORR has been identifying minors in custody who could be potentially removed from the United States, unless they are seeking certain protections, according to the former senior HHS official.

    Immigrant advocates and attorneys who work with migrant children have raised alarm over kids being sent back to the very conditions they were fleeing. They argue that returning kids to their home country is not always in their best interest.

    Unaccompanied migrant children go through immigration proceedings to determine whether they have relief available to them in the US, given conditions at home. According to Wyden, a majority of the more than 500 identified minors have legal counsel in their immigration proceedings.

    “This administration has repeatedly proven that it does not have the best interests of children in mind. While we don’t yet know precisely what they plan to do, we do know that they are willing to act callously and lawlessly when it comes to this deeply vulnerable population of children,” said Neha Desai, managing director of Children’s Human Rights & Dignity at the National Center for Youth Law, in a statement.

    Last year, the administration’s attempt to send Guatemalan children in custody back to their home country prompted a scramble among attorneys who said kids were woken up in the middle of the night. At the time, 76 children were prepared for repatriation, placed on planes for departure then abruptly returned to US custody after a federal judge’s order temporarily blocked their removals.

    The administration argued that it had coordinated with the Guatemalan government and that the children had been requested to return by their parents or legal guardians. Court declarations filed in the case revealed that some of the parents had not requested their return and had been provided last-minute notice.

    “The new information I obtained leads me to believe that the Department is laying the groundwork for another lawless deportation effort, this time on a greater scale, across more countries of origin,” Wyden said.

  • 获曼达尼 backing 的社会主义派初选胜出者创立目标为“铲除”西方文明的组织


    2026年6月25日 美国东部时间上午9:50 / 福克斯新闻频道

    达里亚利扎·阿维拉·谢瓦利尔参与创立了哥伦比亚大学种族隔离撤资组织,该组织宣称要终结西方
    作者:彼得·达布罗斯卡 福克斯新闻

    福克斯新闻记者布莱恩·耶纳斯报道了纽约州国会初选胜出的民主党社会主义者,他们倡导激进政策。以议长迈克·约翰逊为首的共和党人警告这种左倾趋势,将这些候选人贴上“马克思主义者”的标签。选民们通过了包括全民医保和废除移民海关执法局(ICE)在内的党纲,引发了人们对民主党未来的担忧。

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/41e7ddba-8095-4f01-9417-b8954f4f6568

    收听本文
    3分钟

    获得纽约市市长佐赫兰·曼达尼支持的社会主义者在周二晚间纽约州第13国会选区初选中胜出,此人在大学时期创立了一个呼吁彻底摧毁西方的组织。

    32岁的达里亚利扎·阿维拉·谢瓦利尔是美国国会民主党候选人,以“社区组织”为职业,她在独立新闻机构《电子起义报》的一篇专栏文章的个人简介中写道,她“参与发起了哥伦比亚大学种族隔离撤资运动的抵制、撤资和制裁活动”。

    “我们是西方人为了彻底铲除西方文明而战,”该组织在2024年已被删除的Instagram帖子中说道。

    2024年5月,也就是她从哥伦比亚大学毕业8年后,谢瓦利尔回到校园,与她创立的这个简称CUAD的组织一起进行抗议,她头戴凯菲耶赫围巾,T恤上印有该组织的名称。

    达里亚利扎·阿维拉·谢瓦利尔,纽约州第13国会选区民主党国会候选人,2026年6月14日在纽约曼哈顿晨边高地社区与选民交谈。(舒兰·黄 为《华盛顿邮报》拍摄/盖蒂图片社)

    阿维拉·谢瓦利尔当年在该校臭名昭著的反对以色列的校园营地中接受了美联社采访,该营地后来被警方驱散。

    获曼达尼 backing 的社会主义者有着反美言论历史,在激烈的民主党初选中获胜

    就在那次事件数月后,CUAD据称发布了其“铲除西方文明”的目标,引发了轩然大波。

    “我们完全声援全球南方每一场解放运动,”该帖子继续写道。“我们的起义是一场国际主义的斗争——我们为之战斗的目标正是解放全人类。”

    “我们反对一切试图破坏被殖民者人格尊严的种族灭绝、优生学政权,”该组织补充道。

    哈桑·皮克庆祝美国比以往任何时候都更“接近”社会主义,同时为纽约州候选人背书

    国会候选人达里亚利扎·阿维拉·谢瓦利尔2026年6月18日在纽约市国王剧院举行的“投票动员”集会上发表讲话。参议员伯尼·桑德斯和市长佐赫兰·曼达尼与她及其他候选人在民主党初选和早期投票前一同进行了竞选活动。(迈克尔·M·圣地亚哥/盖蒂图片社)

    哥伦比亚大学已明确谴责CUAD,并表示该组织与该校没有任何关联。

    阿维拉·谢瓦利尔出生在佛罗里达州,父母是多米尼加移民。她在近年皈依了伊斯兰教。

    “佐赫兰的政党”:曼达尼在社会主义盟友横扫纽约州初选后成为民主党实权人物

    她与该组织的关联被曝光后,引发了强烈的网上反弹,包括来自民主党当选官员的批评。

    “反以色列、反美国、反西方文明。为什么我是美国参议院中唯一一个拒绝为这些自称为共产主义者的人辩解或辩护的民主党人?”宾夕法尼亚州民主党参议员约翰·费特曼周三晚间在X平台上说道。

    达里亚利扎·阿维拉·谢瓦利尔,纽约州第13国会选区民主党国会候选人,2026年6月14日在纽约曼哈顿晨边高地社区与选民玛丽亚·罗德里格斯交谈。(舒兰·黄 为《华盛顿邮报》拍摄/盖蒂图片社)

    阿维拉·谢瓦利尔在已删除的社交媒体帖子中还曾发表过针对白人女性和反美的言论,其中一次她称自己的祖国“该死的耻辱”。

    利蒂希娅·詹姆斯怒批获曼达尼 backing 的社会主义者横扫纽约州初选

    “我忘了拿餐巾纸,所以就用身后的美国国旗擦了手,”她在另一条已删除的帖子中说道。

    “这位女士创立了一个明确目标为铲除西方文明的组织,而一群有钱的白人进步人士明明知道她指的就是他们,却还说‘尽管来’,”X平台网红肖恩·菲茨杰拉德说道。

    国会候选人克莱尔·巴尔德斯(左)、布拉德·兰德(左二)和达里亚利扎·阿维拉·谢瓦利尔(右)2026年6月18日与市长佐赫兰·曼达尼在纽约市举行的“投票动员”集会上一同举手。(迈克尔·M·圣地亚哥/盖蒂图片社)

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    “真正的‘国家高于政党’考验不会围绕特朗普展开,”RealClearInvestigations作家马克·海明威说道。“它将围绕那些公然宣称要铲除西方文明的共产主义国会议员展开。”

    在这个深蓝选区,阿维拉·谢瓦利尔很可能会在11月轻松当选国会议员。

    福克斯新闻数字频道已联系阿维拉·谢瓦利尔的竞选团队。

    彼得·达布罗斯卡是福克斯新闻数字频道的政治记者。

    Mamdani-backed socialist primary winner founded group whose goal is to ‘eradicate’ Western civilization

    June 25, 2026 9:50am EDT / Fox News

    Darializa Avila Chevalier helped launch Columbia University Apartheid Divest, which said it wants to end the West

    By Peter D’Abrosca Fox News

    Fox News’ Bryan Llenas reports on Democratic socialists winning congressional primaries in New York advocating for radical policies. Republicans, led by Speaker Mike Johnson, warn against this leftward shift, labeling the candidates ‘Marxist.’ Voters approved platforms including Medicare-for-all and abolishing ICE, prompting concerns about the Democratic Party’s future.

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    blob:https://www.foxnews.com/41e7ddba-8095-4f01-9417-b8954f4f6568

    Listen to this article

    3 min

    The socialist backed by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani who won Tuesday night’s primary election in New York’s 13th Congressional District founded a group in college that called for the total destruction of the West.

    Darializa Avila Chevalier, 32, a Democratic nominee for U.S. Congress who made career out of “community organizing,” wrote in her biography for an opinion piece in independent news outlet The Electronic Intifada that she “helped launch the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign Columbia University Apartheid Divest.”

    “We are Westerners fighting for the total eradication of Western civilization,” the group said in a now-deleted 2024 Instagram post.

    In May 2024, eight years after she graduated from Columbia, Chevalier was back on campus advocating alongside the group she founded, known as CUAD, wearing a keffiyeh and a t-shirt emblazoned with the group’s name.

    Darializa Avila Chevalier, Democratic candidate for Congress in New York’s 13th Congressional District, speaks with a voter in the Morningside Heights neighborhood of Manhattan on June 14, 2026, in New York, N.Y.(Shuran Huang/For The Washington Post via Getty Images)

    Avila Chevalier was interviewed by the Associated Press at the school’s infamous encampment against Israel that year, which was later broken up by police.

    MAMDANI-BACKED SOCIALIST WITH HISTORY OF ANTI-AMERICAN RHETORIC WINS VICIOUS DEM PRIMARY RACE

    Only months after that, CUAD, caused a firestorm when it reportedly posted its goal of eradicating Western Civilization.

    “We stand in full solidarity with every movement for liberation in the Global South,” the post continued. “Our Intifada is an internationalist one — we are fighting for nothing less than the liberation of all people.”

    “We reject every genocidal, eugenicist regime that seeks to undermine the personhood of the colonized,” the group added.

    HASAN PIKER CELEBRATES AMERICA BEING ‘CLOSER THAN EVER’ TO SOCIALISM AS HE BACKS NYC CANDIDATES

    Congressional candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier speaks during a Get Out the Vote rally at King’s Theater in New York City on June 18, 2026. Sen. Bernie Sanders and Mayor Zohran Mamdani campaigned alongside her and other candidates ahead of the Democratic primary and early voting.(Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

    Columbia University has roundly denounced CUAD, and says it is not affiliated in any way with the school.

    Avila Chevalier was born in Florida to Dominican immigrants. She converted to Islam in recent years.

    ‘PARTY OF ZOHRAN’: MAMDANI EMERGES AS DEMOCRATIC KINGMAKER AFTER SOCIALIST ALLIES SWEEP NYC PRIMARIES

    The surfacing of her affiliation with the group has sparked intense online backlash, including from elected Democrats.

    “Anti-Israel. Anti-America. Anti-Western Civilization. Why am I the only Democrat in the U.S. Senate that refuses to excuse this or defend any of those self-identified communists?” Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., said on X Wednesday evening.

    Darializa Avila Chevalier, Democratic candidate for Congress in New York’s 13th Congressional District, speaks with voter Maria Rodriguez in the Morningside Heights neighborhood of Manhattan on June 14, 2026.(Shuran Huang/For The Washington Post via Getty Images)

    Avila Chevalier also infamously expressed anti-white women and anti-American sentiments in deleted social media posts, one time calling her home country “a f—ing disgrace.”

    LETITIA JAMES FUMES AS MAMDANI-BACKED SOCIALISTS SWEEP NEW YORK PRIMARIES

    “I forgot to get napkins so I just wiped my hand on the American flag behind me,” she said in another deleted post.

    “This lady founded an organization with a stated goal of Eradicating Western civilization, & a bunch of rich white progressives who know she means them, said ‘please do,’” X personality Sean Fitzgerald said.

    Congressional candidates Claire Valdez, left, Brad Lander, second from left, and Darializa Avila Chevalier, right, raise their hands with Mayor Zohran Mamdani during a Get Out the Vote rally in New York City on June 18, 2026.(Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “The real ‘country over party’ test isn’t going to be about Trump,” said RealClearInvestigations writer Mark Hemingway. “It’s going to be over communist Congress members who literally say they want to eradicate Western civilization.”

    In a deeply blue district, Avila Chevalier is likely to waltz her way into Congress in November.

    Fox News Digital reached out to Avila Chevalier’s campaign.

    Peter D’Abrosca is a politics reporter at Fox News Digital.

湘ICP备2026001899号-2