作者: root

  • 新闻


    请提供需要翻译的英文新闻文章,我将按照您的要求进行高质量的中文翻译。

    No English content available

  • 特朗普任命之人:司法部反欺诈战的新执行者


    作者:[汉娜·拉比诺维茨]

    更新于1小时17分钟前

    最后更新:2026年2月25日,美国东部时间下午5:48

    发布于2026年2月25日,美国东部时间下午4:32

    [Image_1]

    科林·麦克唐纳

    科林·麦克唐纳/领英

    在总统唐纳德·特朗普于国情咨文演讲中宣布对欺诈发起“战争”后的次日清晨,司法部高级检察官科林·麦克唐纳在参议院司法委员会上表示,他将坚定遵循司法部传统,仅以证据为核心。

    “我是一名职业联邦检察官,”麦克唐纳称,“我遵循事实;我适用法律——这是我工作中唯一的两个考量因素。”

    他的这番话概括了司法部的核心承诺,民主党和共和党政府时期的总检察长都曾反复引用这一承诺。但这番话并未直接回应他被问及的问题:即被任命领导司法部新成立的反欺诈部门的麦克唐纳,是否会听从特朗普的命令,起诉其认定的政敌。

    “你现在身处一个高度政治化的部门,”委员会中的民主党参议员马齐·希罗诺警告道,“我们已经知道,总统将司法部视为他的私人律师事务所,帕姆·邦迪是他的律师。你处于这一链条的下游,我看不出你如何能声称自己保持独立,无论你可能多么希望如此。”

    特朗普政府将广泛存在的欺诈指控作为其起诉工作的主要焦点,同时也将其作为批评民主党官员的政治工具。最引人注目的是,政府将矛头指向明尼苏达州的一起大规模欺诈丑闻,检察官估计该州被盗资金总额可能超过90亿美元。总统特别指责民主党官员允许该州成为“欺诈性洗钱活动的中心”。

    麦克唐纳的职业生涯相对低调,直到一年前他带着妻子和五个孩子搬到华盛顿特区,辞去了在加利福尼亚州南区联邦检察官办公室长达十年的职位,转而加入副检察长托德·布兰奇的办公室。在那里,他的工作涵盖从执法问题到联合主持所谓的“武器化工作组”等各个方面。

    今年1月,特朗普在Truth Social上宣布提名麦克唐纳为“美国司法部首位负责国家反欺诈执法的助理司法部长”,这是他新设立的一个部门,旨在“抓捕和阻止一直以来从美国人民那里窃取财富的欺诈者”。

    新部门在麦克唐纳被提名前就已受到审查。司法部已有多个办公室负责调查刑事和民事欺诈案件,这引发了部分议员和法律专家对设立新部门必要性的质疑。

    副总统JD·万斯在1月初对记者表示,该职位将类似于特别顾问的角色,但“由白宫直接运作,在我和美国总统的监督下进行”,专家们认为这将违背司法部长期以来避免政治干预的努力。

    特朗普在演讲中称将领导“反欺诈战争”的万斯周三表示,此次行动将是一场“全政府行动”,包括财政部在内的其他联邦部门均将参与其中。

    麦克唐纳试图在周三的听证会上缓解对工作重复的担忧,他表示其办公室将与司法部现有的欺诈部门形成“互补”,并最初专注于涉及医疗补助和SNAP(补充营养援助计划)资金滥用的案件——这两起案件均被指发生在明尼苏达州。他还指出,司法部的组织架构图显示他将直接向邦迪和布兰奇汇报,并承诺与联邦、州或地方合作伙伴“无论其政党归属如何”进行合作。

    周三,没有参议员询问麦克唐纳万斯将在其办公室的工作中扮演何种角色。副总统当天稍晚在活动中表示,麦克唐纳“给很多人留下了深刻印象。他当然给我留下了深刻印象。”

    麦克唐纳试图表现出非政治性的努力,却大多未被参议院民主党人理会,他们继续施压要求他明确表示不会听从总统的起诉要求。

    “如果宪法确实要求总统确保法律得到忠实执行,那么如果他们不确保我们阻止这种欺诈行为,那将是失职。”共和党参议员阿什利·穆迪最终打断道,“对吗?”

    “我同意这一点,参议员。”麦克唐纳回答。

    本文已更新,添加了更多细节。

    Meet the man Trump picked to pursue his war on fraud at the Justice Department

    By [Hannah Rabinowitz]

    Updated 1 hr 17 min ago

    Updated Feb 25, 2026, 5:48 PM ET

    PUBLISHED Feb 25, 2026, 4:32 PM ET

    [Image_1]

    Colin McDonald

    Colin McDonald/LinkedIn

    The morning after President Donald Trump declared a “war on fraud” during his State of the Union address, senior Justice Department prosecutor Colin McDonald told the Senate Judiciary Committee and said he would steadfastly follow the department’s tradition to focus only on the evidence.

    “I am a career federal prosecutor,” McDonald said. “I follow the facts; I apply the law — those are the two considerations that come into play for me.”

    His comment paraphrased a promise that’s core to the Justice Department, cited constantly by attorneys general under both Democratic and Republican administrations. But it didn’t directly address what he was asked: Whether McDonald, who is tapped to run a new DOJ division tasked with rooting out fraud, would follow an order from Trump to prosecute one of his own perceived enemies.

    “You are now placed in a highly politicized division,” one of the Democratic senators on the committee, Mazie Hirono, warned. “We already know that the president considers the Department of Justice to be his law firm, Pam Bondi to be his lawyer. You are down the chain and I don’t see how you sit there and tell us that you are going to be independent, as much as you might want to be.”

    The Trump administration has made allegations of widespread fraud a main focus of their prosecution efforts, as well as a political tool to criticize Democratic officials. Most notably, the administration has focused on a wide-ranging fraud scandal in Minnesota that prosecutors estimate could total more than $9 billion in stolen funds. The president has specifically laid blame at the feet of Democratic officials for allowing the state to become a “hub of fraudulent money laundering activity.”

    McDonald’s career was relatively low profile until he moved with his wife and five children to Washington, DC, one year ago, leaving his decadelong post at the federal prosecutor’s office in California’s Southern District to work in Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s office. There, his work focused on everything from law enforcement issues to co-chairing the so-called Weaponization Working Group.

    In January, Trump announced on Truth Social his nomination of McDonald as the “first ever Assistant Attorney General for National FRAUD Enforcement, a new Division at the Department of Justice, which I created to catch and stop FRAUDSTERS that have been STEALING from the American People.”

    The new division was under scrutiny before McDonald was even nominated. The Justice Department already has multiple offices that investigate criminal and civil fraud cases, leading some lawmakers and legal experts to question whether creating the new division is necessary.

    And Vice President JD Vance told reporters in early January that the role will be like that of a special counsel, but “run out of the White House under the supervision of me and the president United States,” which experts said would run afoul to longstanding department efforts to stay separate from political interference.

    Vance, who Trump said in his speech would lead the “war on fraud,” said Wednesday that the effort would be a “whole government approach” that included other federal departments, including the Treasury Department.

    McDonald tried to ease concerns of duplicate efforts during the hearing Wednesday, saying that his office would be “complementary” of the department’s preexisting fraud sections and would initially focus on cases that involved abuses of Medicaid and SNAP funds — both of which are alleged to have taken place in Minnesota. He also pointed to a Justice Department organization chart that showed he would report directly to Bondi and Blanche, and pledged to work with federal, state or local partners “regardless of political party.”

    None of the senators asked McDonald Wednesday what role Vance’s would play in his office’s efforts. The vice president said at an event later in the day that McDonald “impressed a lot of people. He certainly impressed me.”

    McDonald’s attempts to appear non-political largely fell on deaf ears among Senate Democrats, who continued to push him to say definitively that he would not listen to prosecutorial demands from the president.

    “If in fact the Constitution requires that the president take care that the laws be faithfully executed, it would be a dereliction of duty if they did not ensure that we stop this fraud,” Republican Sen. Ashley Moody eventually cut in. “Is that correct?”

    “I agree with that, senator,” McDonald said.

    This story has been updated with additional details.

  • 李强:中德经济合作面远大于竞争面


    发布时间:2026年2月26日 07:42 / 来源:联合早报

    中国国务院总理李强(右八)2月25日下午在北京人民大会堂同德国总理默茨(左八)共同出席中德经济顾问委员会座谈会。 (中新社)

    中国国务院总理李强表示,中德经济、产业优势互补的基本格局没有改变,合作面远大于竞争面,完全可以通过塑造良性的竞合关系,更好地携手发展。

    据中新社报道,星期三(2月25日)下午,李强在北京人民大会堂同德国总理默茨共同出席中德经济顾问委员会座谈会。

    李强指出,过去一段时间以来,世界经济的不稳定不确定性总体在上升。中德作为世界两大经济体,通过持续紧密合作,既为各自发展拓展了空间,也为世界经济注入了动能。

    他强调,当前,世界经济仍然面临着较大挑战,单边主义、保护主义在一些国家和地区抬头甚至盛行,使国际经贸秩序遭到严重破坏。越是形势严峻,中德越应当加强合作。唯有合作,才是应对风险的最优解;唯有发展,才是保障安全的必选项。

    李强表示,目前中德经济都呈现回升向好势头。“十五五”时期,两国经贸合作将迎来更加广阔的空间。中德经济、产业优势互补的基本格局没有变,合作面远大于竞争面,完全可以通过塑造良性的竞合关系,更好地携手发展。

    他建议,双方可以重点聚焦三个方面协同发力,实现更高水平的互利共赢。一是做强传统合作的基本盘。两国企业可以继续深耕机械、装备、化工等领域合作,加快业务本土化,不断提升韧性和效率。二是把握未来发展的新机遇。支持两国企业和科研机构推进创新资源双向流动,深入开展技术共研、平台共建、成果共享,还可以共同开拓第三方市场。三是营造投资兴业的好环境。中国将坚定不移扩大高水平对外开放,积极解决德国等外资企业合理诉求。希望德国政府提供开放、公正、非歧视的营商环境,让两国企业遵循市场原则开展合作与竞争。希望中德企业家既为推动两国经贸合作,也为增进双方沟通理解、促进双边关系稳定发挥重要作用。

    吴政隆参加活动。60余位中德企业代表出席。

    李强:中德经济合作面远大于竞争面

    发布时间:2026年2月26日 07:42 / 来源:联合早报

    中国国务院总理李强(右八)2月25日下午在北京人民大会堂同德国总理默茨(左八)共同出席中德经济顾问委员会座谈会。 (中新社)

    中国国务院总理李强说,中德经济、产业优势互补的基本格局没有变,合作面远大于竞争面,完全可以通过塑造良性的竞合关系,更好地携手发展。

    据中新社报道,星期三(2月25日)下午,李强在北京人民大会堂同德国总理默茨共同出席中德经济顾问委员会座谈会。

    李强说,过去一段时间以来,世界经济的不稳定不确定性总体在上升。中德作为世界两大经济体,通过持续紧密合作,既为各自发展拓展了空间,也为世界经济注入了动能。

    他说,当前,世界经济仍然面临着较大挑战,单边主义、保护主义在一些国家和地区抬头甚至盛行,使国际经贸秩序遭到严重破坏。越是形势严峻,中德越应当加强合作。唯有合作,才是应对风险的最优解;唯有发展,才是保障安全的必选项。

    李强说,目前中德经济都呈现回升向好势头。“十五五”时期,两国经贸合作将迎来更加广阔的空间。中德经济、产业优势互补的基本格局没有变,合作面远大于竞争面,完全可以通过塑造良性的竞合关系,更好地携手发展。

    他建议,双方可以重点聚焦三个方面协同发力,实现更高水平的互利共赢。一是做强传统合作的基本盘。两国企业可以继续深耕机械、装备、化工等领域合作,加快业务本土化,不断提升韧性和效率。二是把握未来发展的新机遇。支持两国企业和科研机构推进创新资源双向流动,深入开展技术共研、平台共建、成果共享,还可以共同开拓第三方市场。三是营造投资兴业的好环境。中国将坚定不移扩大高水平对外开放,积极解决德国等外资企业合理诉求。希望德国政府提供开放、公正、非歧视的营商环境,让两国企业遵循市场原则开展合作与竞争。希望中德企业家既为推动两国经贸合作,也为增进双方沟通理解、促进双边关系稳定发挥重要作用。

    吴政隆参加活动。60余位中德企业代表出席。

  • ICE去年10个月内逮捕261名DACA受益人,文件显示


    2026年2月25日 / 美国东部时间下午4:57 / CBS新闻

    根据美国官方政府统计数据,这些数据已提交给国会并由CBS新闻获取,在特朗普政府第二个任期的前10个月内,联邦移民局特工逮捕了261名“童年入境者暂缓遣返”计划(DACA)受益人。

    统计数据表明,在此期间被联邦移民拘留的绝大多数DACA受益人都有犯罪记录。

    这些政府数据是迄今为止最全面的官方统计,显示有多少DACA受益人(也被称为“追梦人”)被特朗普总统的全国性驱逐打击行动所逮捕。

    这些参与奥巴马时期DACA计划的人,在童年时非法进入美国或签证过期滞留。在通过背景调查并满足若干要求后,他们获得了临时工作许可和驱逐保护,包括2007年6月前进入美国、没有严重犯罪记录以及从美国高中毕业或服过兵役。

    国土安全部在给伊利诺伊州民主党参议员迪克·德宾的一封信中表示,在2025年1月1日至11月19日期间,移民和海关执法局(ICE)逮捕了261名DACA受益人,并将其中86人驱逐出境。这一时间框架包括拜登总统任期的最后19天,尽管目前尚不清楚有多少逮捕行动是在他的任内进行的,因为他的政府很少针对DACA受益人。

    国土安全部关于DACA逮捕和驱逐的信件

    国土安全部在信中表示,在被ICE拘留的261名DACA受益人中,有241人(占92%)有“民事移民违规以外的犯罪记录”。国土安全部通常将待审刑事指控和定罪视为犯罪记录。这封信由国土安全部部长克里斯蒂·诺姆签署,未具体说明所称犯罪记录的严重程度。

    CBS新闻已联系国土安全部代表,要求提供更多关于这些被确定有犯罪记录的DACA受益人的指控或定罪性质的详细信息。

    在回应国土安全部信件的声明中,德宾和其他民主党参议员亚历克斯·帕迪利亚和马克·凯利称逮捕DACA受益人“令人深感不安”,并表示拘留“扰乱家庭、危害社区,并造成不必要的社会、情感和经济成本”。

    民主党参议员还对国土安全部提供的犯罪数据提出质疑,指出他们正在要求更多细节。

    “诺姆部长在给我们的信中声称,在被逮捕的261名DACA受益人中,有241人有‘犯罪记录’,但没有提供任何进一步的细节,”他们说。“DACA受益人每次续期保护时都要通过严格的背景调查,而特朗普政府毫不犹豫地逮捕没有严重犯罪定罪的移民,并错误地将他们贴上‘最坏之流’的标签。”

    对DACA受益人的逮捕和驱逐,与倡导者对特朗普驱逐运动中逮捕了多少“追梦人”的非官方估计相比,有了显著增加。但这也只占数十万处于活跃DACA身份的移民中的一小部分。

    根据美国公民及移民服务局的数据,截至2025年6月底,约有51.6万名“追梦人”参加了DACA,其中大多数居住在加利福尼亚州、德克萨斯州、伊利诺伊州、佛罗里达州和纽约州。

    DACA是少数由民主党总统制定的移民计划之一,特朗普政府第二个任期尚未试图终止,但该政策在法律上面临危险。

    自第二次就职以来,特朗普先生迅速采取行动撤销了许多奥巴马和拜登时期的移民政策,包括撤销数十万来自危机国家移民的临时保护身份。但特朗普政府官员,包括美国公民及移民服务局局长约瑟夫·埃洛,都拒绝公开表示他们打算如何处理DACA。

    特朗普政府第一个任期曾试图终止DACA,称其非法。但最高法院在2020年以技术理由阻止了这一努力,使该政策得以保留,尽管是以“僵尸”形式存在。

    近年来,德克萨斯州和路易斯安那州的联邦法院宣布DACA以及拜登政府将该政策编纂成法律的努力非法。但他们允许现有受益人继续更新其两年期工作许可和驱逐延期。

    然而,由共和党领导的挑战DACA合法性的州去年秋天请求德克萨斯州联邦法官下令特朗普政府逐步终止该政策。目前尚不清楚法官何时会做出裁决以及如何裁决。

    国土安全部在给国会的信中指出,DACA只是一种可以被撤销的临时保护措施。

    “它不附带无限期留在美国的权利或资格。有特定犯罪记录的外国人将不被考虑加入DACA,”国土安全部表示。“此外,违反条款的人也将面临终止和驱逐。”

    正如国土安全部信件中所概述的,DACA被逮捕者中有很高比例有犯罪记录,这与特朗普政府第二个任期内被ICE拘留的总体人数中较低的犯罪率形成鲜明对比。

    在特朗普总统重返白宫的第一年,ICE逮捕了近40万名涉嫌非法滞留美国的移民。根据CBS新闻获取的国土安全部内部文件,不到14%的被捕者有暴力犯罪记录。总体而言,过去一年ICE逮捕的人中有60%有刑事指控或定罪,约40%除民事移民违规外没有任何犯罪记录。

    ICE arrested 261 DACA recipients over 10 months last year, document shows

    February 25, 2026 / 4:57 PM EST / CBS News

    Federal immigration agents arrested 261 beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, during the first 10 months of the second Trump administration, according to official U.S. government statistics that were shared with Congress and obtained by CBS News.

    The statistics indicate the vast majority of DACA recipients taken into federal immigration custody during that period had criminal records.

    The government figures provide the most comprehensive official accounting so far of how many DACA recipients, also known as “Dreamers,” have been swept up by President Trump’s nationwide deportation crackdown.

    Those enrolled in the Obama-era DACA program came to the U.S. illegally or overstayed their visas as children. They were granted temporary work permits and deportation protections after passing background checks and meeting several requirements, including coming to the U.S. before June 2007, not having serious criminal histories and graduating from an American high school or serving in the military.

    In a letter to Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the Department of Homeland Security said that between Jan. 1 and Nov. 19, 2025, ICE arrested 261 DACA beneficiaries and deported 86 of them. That timeframe includes the final 19 days of President Joe Biden’s term, though it is unclear how many of the arrests occurred under his administration, which rarely targeted DACA beneficiaries.

    DHS letter on DACA arrests and deportations

    DHS said in its letter that 241 — or 92% — of the 261 DACA enrollees taken into ICE custody had “criminal histories” outside of civil immigration violations. DHS typically considers pending criminal charges and convictions as criminal histories. The letter, signed by DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, did not specify the severity of the alleged criminal records.

    CBS News reached out to representatives for DHS, including to request more details on the nature of the charges or convictions of the DACA recipients identified as having criminal histories.

    In a statement in response to the DHS letter, Durbin and fellow Democratic Sens. Alex Padilla and Mark Kelly called the arrests of DACA recipients “deeply troubling,” saying the detentions “disrupt families, harm communities, and inflict unnecessary social, emotional, and economic costs.”

    The Democratic senators also questioned the criminal figures provided by DHS, noting they’re demanding more details.

    “Secretary Noem’s response to our letter claims that 241 of the 261 DACA recipients arrested had ‘criminal histories,’ without providing any further details,” they said. “DACA recipients go through strict background checks every time they renew this protection, and the Trump Administration has not hesitated to arrest immigrants with no serious criminal convictions and falsely label them the ‘worst of the worst.’”

    The arrests and deportations of DACA recipients represent a significant increase from unofficial estimates by advocates about how many “Dreamers” had been arrested under Mr. Trump’s deportation campaign. But they also represent a small fraction of the hundreds of thousands of immigrants with active DACA status.

    As of the end of June 2025, roughly 516,000 Dreamers were enrolled in DACA, with the majority living in states like California, Texas, Illinois, Florida and New York, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services data.

    DACA has been one of rare immigration programs created under a Democratic president that the second Trump administration has not yet moved to end, though the policy remains in legal peril.

    Since taking office for a second time, Mr. Trump has moved swiftly to undo numerous Obama and Biden-era immigration policies, including by revoking the Temporary Protected Status of hundreds of thousands of immigrants from crisis-stricken nations. But Trump administration officials, including USCIS Director Joseph Edlow, have declined to say publicly what they intend to do with DACA.

    The first Trump administration tried to terminate DACA, arguing it was illegal. But the Supreme Court blocked that effort on technical grounds in 2020, allowing the policy to survive, though in a zombie-like form.

    In recent years, federal courts in Texas and Louisiana have declared DACA — and the Biden administration’s efforts to codify the policy — illegal. But they have allowed current recipients to continue renewing their two-year work permits and deportation deferrals.

    The Republican-led states challenging DACA’s legality, however, asked a federal judge in Texas last fall to order the Trump administration to gradually terminate the policy. It’s unclear when or how the judge will rule.

    In its letter to Congress, DHS noted DACA is only a temporary protection that can be revoked.

    “It comes with no right or entitlement to remain in the United States indefinitely. Aliens with certain criminal histories will not be considered for DACA,” DHS said. “Further, those who violate the terms are also subject to termination and removal.”

    The high percentage of DACA arrestees with criminal histories, as outlined in the DHS letter, stands in sharp contrast with the lower criminality levels among the overall number of people taken into ICE custody under the second Trump administration.

    In President Trump’s first year back in the White House, ICE arrested nearly 400,000 immigrants suspected of being in the U.S. illegally. According to an internal DHS document obtained by CBS News, less than 14% of arrestees had violent criminal records. Overall, 60% of those arrested by ICE over the past year had criminal charges or convictions, and about 40% did not have any criminal records, beyond civil immigration violations.

  • 特朗普政府推迟2.59亿美元付款,要求明尼苏达州提出停止福利计划的方案


    By Emma Colton
    Fox News

    Published February 25, 2026 5:55pm EST

    副总统JD·万斯周三宣布,特朗普政府正在暂时停止向明尼苏达州提供医疗补助资金,给民主党籍明尼苏达州州长蒂姆·瓦尔兹60天时间,以整顿该州的资金分配方式。

    “我们决定暂时停止向明尼苏达州拨付部分医疗补助资金,以确保明尼苏达州认真履行其作为美国人民税款管理者的义务,”万斯周三在新闻发布会上表示。该发布会由医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心主任梅赫梅特·奥兹出席。

    这一宣布是在总统唐纳德·特朗普周二晚间国情咨文演讲中猛烈抨击明尼苏达州欺诈行为之后做出的。明尼苏达州因所谓的社会项目和福利项目欺诈事件而备受震动,这些欺诈行为可追溯至新冠疫情期间,调查人员估计涉案金额可能高达90亿美元。

    特朗普在国情咨文讲话中指出副总统正在领导政府的”反欺诈战争”。

    [image_1]

    副总统JD·万斯与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心主任梅赫梅特·奥兹于2026年2月25日就打击欺诈行为发表讲话。(Oliver Contreras / AFP via Getty Images)

    万斯周三解释说:”我们正在停止将流向州政府的联邦付款,直到州政府认真履行其阻止对美国纳税人实施欺诈的义务。”

    副总统继续表示,官员们已经核实,明尼苏达州一个旨在为自闭症儿童提供课后照料的项目实际上被欺诈者利用。

    “很多人正靠美国纳税人的慷慨致富,”万斯说,”但更根本、更重要的是,这意味着明尼苏达州有需要这些服务的孩子,但这些服务没有给到孩子,而是给了明尼阿波利斯的欺诈者。这是不可接受的。这就是我们今天采取行动要切断的问题。”

    [image_2]

    参议员乔尼·恩斯特因明尼苏达州大规模欺诈丑闻将州长蒂姆·瓦尔兹评为她每月的”揭发奖”得主。(Jim Vondruska/Getty Images)

    奥兹补充说,这一暂停标志着医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心”采取的最大规模反欺诈行动”,随后他详细说明政府如何推迟向该州拨付资金。

    高度编辑的审计显示明尼苏达州医疗补助存在广泛漏洞

    “到明尼苏达州的医疗补助资金将被推迟2.59亿美元,我现在正在向州长瓦尔兹及其团队宣布这一决定,”奥兹说,”这是基于对2025年最后三个月的审计结果。重申一下:本月将不会向明尼苏达州支付2.5亿美元的医疗补助索赔款项。”

    “我们已通知该州,我们会给他们这笔钱,但我们会扣留它,只有在他们提出并实施全面的纠正行动计划以解决问题后才会发放,”奥兹说,”如果明尼苏达州未能清理系统,该州今年将累积10亿美元的递延付款。”

    奥兹表示,瓦尔兹有60天时间对他和政府发送给瓦尔兹的相关信件作出回应。

    福克斯新闻数字版周三下午联系了瓦尔兹的办公室请求置评,但尚未收到回复。

    奥兹继续表示,他相信瓦尔兹会认真对待此事,并指出欺诈行为不仅发生在明尼苏达州,其他州也存在类似情况。

    [image_3]

    医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心主任梅赫梅特·奥兹于6月30日在华盛顿特区美国司法部举行的新闻发布会上出席会议。(Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

    “这些计划不成比例地涉及移民社区,”奥兹继续说道,”他们有保护,能够…组织行动,有时他们不明白正在发生什么。”

    万斯补充说,政府并不愿意采取这一举措,但由于明尼苏达州”对联邦税款漫不经心”,这是必要的。

    “我们只需要明尼苏达州州长和政府做一件非常简单的事情,就是在向某人提供医疗补助资金之前,认真核实他们是否提供了声称提供的服务,”副总统称欺诈行为是”一种耻辱”。

    明尼苏达州民主党人因向索马里人欺诈损失180亿美元向移民局要求赔偿

    特朗普在周二的国情咨文中强调了欺诈问题,指出尽管明尼苏达州成为焦点,但其他州也存在根深蒂固的欺诈行为。

    [image_4]

    总统唐纳德·特朗普在国情咨文演讲中警告伊朗核计划。(Kenny Holston/The New York Times via AP)

    “在这场掠夺美国的腐败中——它真的在掠夺美国——没有比明尼苏达州更惊人的例子了,那里的索马里社区成员从美国纳税人那里掠夺了约190亿美元,”特朗普说,”哦,我们掌握了所有信息。”

    “实际上,这个数字要高得多,加利福尼亚州、马萨诸塞州、缅因州和许多其他州的情况甚至更糟。这种腐败正在撕裂一个国家的结构,而我们正在以难以置信的力度打击它,”他继续说道,随后提名万斯为领导打击欺诈的政府官员。

    相关文章

    [image_5]

    JD·万斯发起”反欺诈战争”,承诺铲除非法移民”窃取”的纳税人资金

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Trump administration defers $259M in payments until state proposes plan to stop welfare schemes

    By Emma Colton
    Fox News

    Published February 25, 2026 5:55pm EST

    Vice President JD Vance announced Wednesday that the Trump administration is temporarily halting Medicaid funding to the state of Minnesota, giving Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz 60 days to clean up how the state doles out funding.

    “We have decided to temporarily halt certain amounts of Medicaid funding that are going to the state of Minnesota in order to ensure that the state of Minnesota takes its obligations seriously to be good stewards of the American people’s tax money,” Vance said Wednesday in a press event attended by Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Mehmet Oz.

    The announcement comes after President Donald Trump railed against fraud in the Gopher State Tuesday evening in his State of the Union address. Minnesota has been rocked by alleged fraud surrounding social programs and welfare programs stretching back to the COVID-19 pandemic that investigators estimate could top $9 billion.

    Trump pointed to his vice president as leading the administration’s “war on fraud” amid his State of the Union remarks.

    [image_1]

    Vice President JD Vance, alongside Medicare and Medicaid Administrator Mehmet Oz, speaks about combatting fraud Feb. 25, 2026.(Oliver Contreras / AFP via Getty Images)

    Vance explained Wednesday that “we are stopping the federal payments that will go to the state government until the state government takes its obligations seriously to stop the fraud that’s being perpetrated against the American taxpayer.”

    The vice president continued that officials have verified that a program in Minnesota intended to provide after-school care to autistic children actually benefited fraudsters.

    “A lot of people are getting rich off the generosity of American taxpayers,” Vance said. “But more fundamentally, and more importantly than that, it means that there are kids in Minnesota who deserve these services, who need these services, and they’re not going to those kids. They’re going to fraudsters in Minneapolis. That is unacceptable. And that’s the sort of thing that we’re cutting off with this action today.”

    [image_2]

    Sen. Joni Ernst named Gov. Tim Walz the recipient of her monthly “Squeal Award” for the sweeping Minnesota fraud scandal.(Jim Vondruska/Getty Images)

    Oz added that it is that the pause marks “the largest action against fraud that we’ve ever taken” at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, before launching into how the administration is deferring funds to the state.

    HEAVILY-REDACTED AUDIT FINDS MINNESOTA MEDICAID HAD WIDESPREAD VULNERABILITIES

    “It’s going to be $259 million of deferred payments for Medicaid to Minnesota, which we’re announcing as I speak, to Governor Walz and his team,” Oz said. “That’s based on an audit of the last three months of 2025. Restated: a quarter billion dollars is not going to be paid this month to Minnesota for its Medicaid claims.”

    “We have notified the state and said that we will give them the money, but we’re going to hold it and only release it after they propose and act on a comprehensive corrective action plan to solve the problem,” Oz said. “If Minnesota fails to clean up the systems, the state will rack up $1 billion of deferred payments this year.”

    Walz has 60 days to respond to a letter Oz and the administration sent to Walz on the matter, Oz said.

    Fox News Digital reached out to Walz’s office Wednesday afternoon for comment and has yet to receive a reply.

    Oz continued that he believes Walz will take the matter seriously, and noted fraud is not exclusive to Minnesota, but also other states.

    [image_3]

    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz attends a press conference at the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., on June 30.(Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

    “These schemes disproportionately involve immigrant communities,” Oz continued. “They’re insulated, they’re able to … organize efforts, and sometimes they don’t understand what’s going on.”

    Vance added that the administration does not want to make this move, but it is needed due to Minnesota being “careless with federal tax dollars.”

    “All we need the governor and the administration of Minnesota to do is something quite simple, which is to show that before you give Medicaid funds to somebody, you’re taking seriously whether they provided the services that they say that they’re providing,” the vice president said, calling the fraud a “disgrace.”

    MINNESOTA DEMOCRATS DEMAND REPARATIONS FROM ICE AFTER LOSING $18 BILLION TO SOMALI FRAUD

    Trump spotlighted the fraud in his State of the Union address Tuesday, underscoring that while Minnesota has taken the spotlight, schemes run deep in other states as well.

    [image_4]

    President Donald Trump warned during his State of the Union speech about Iran’s nuclear program.(Kenny Holston/The New York Times via AP)

    “When it comes to the corruption that is plundering — it really, it’s plundering America — there’s been no more stunning example than Minnesota, where members of the Somali community have pillaged an estimated $19 billion from the American taxpayer,” Trump said. “Oh, we have all the information.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “And in actuality, the number is much higher than that, and California, Massachusetts, Maine and many other states are even worse. This is the kind of corruption that shreds the fabric of a nation, and we are working on it like you wouldn’t believe,” he continued, before naming Vance as the administration leader taking on fraud.

    Related Article

    [image_5]

    JD Vance spearheads ‘war on fraud,’ promises to root out taxpayer money ‘stolen’ by illegal immigrants

  • 消息人士称,联邦调查局国会事务负责人即将离职


    2026年2月25日 / 美国东部时间下午6:16 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    联邦调查局(FBI)国会事务办公室负责人马歇尔·耶茨(Marshall Yates)正在离开该局,多位消息人士向哥伦比亚广播公司新闻透露。

    据直接了解此事的其他消息人士称,耶茨曾是国会山的一名工作人员,去年他担任联邦调查局在跨部门武器化工作组(Interagency Weaponization Working Group)的代表之一。该工作组由来自至少12个不同政府部门的数十名政府官员组成,其任务是执行特朗普总统对其政治对手进行报复的计划。

    耶茨是被指派到该工作组的几名联邦调查局雇员之一。

    这些消息人士称,他还参与了司法部领导的武器化工作组的相关工作,涉及对1月6日骚乱者的起诉,以及被解雇的前联邦调查局特工的潜在复职事宜。这些特工声称,他们在拜登政府期间因对新冠疫情协议有异议、1月6日事件及其他问题而被解雇。

    一位消息人士称,耶茨的最后工作日预计是周五。ProPublica网站此前报道了他离职的消息。

    一位熟悉耶茨计划的消息人士告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,他辞职是为了有更多时间陪伴家人,目前正在协助寻找继任者。

    哥伦比亚广播公司新闻联系耶茨寻求置评。

    作为国会事务负责人,耶茨一直是与参议院司法委员会主席查尔斯·格拉斯利(Charles Grassley)讨论的关键人物。

    在过去一年中,格拉斯利多次公布了与联邦调查局对特朗普总统调查相关的一系列文件,即所谓的”北极霜冻”(Arctic Frost)行动,但未隐去特工姓名。

    这些名字公开后,联邦调查局解雇了这些特工。其中就包括沃尔特·贾尔迪纳(Walt Giardina),他曾参与调查特朗普及其政治盟友的案件。

    前代理联邦调查局局长布莱恩·德里斯科尔(Brian Driscoll)和其他前高级官员已对联邦调查局提起诉讼,指控华盛顿特区办公室当时的负责人在一次会议中恳求联邦调查局局长卡什·帕特尔(Kash Patel)和耶茨不要向国会山披露贾尔迪纳的姓名,称贾尔迪纳的妻子正死于癌症,这样做还会”引发大量网络辱骂和暴力威胁”。

    后来,格拉斯利办公室的记录中公布了贾尔迪纳的名字,他随后被解雇。

    耶茨此前曾在肯塔基州共和党众议员托马斯·梅西(Thomas Massie)的办公室工作,后者正因司法部处理爱泼斯坦案件档案发布问题与司法部展开激烈言辞交锋。

    他还曾是众议员莫·布鲁克斯(Mo Brooks)的助手,并与选举诚信网络(Election Integrity Network)合作。该网络由克莱塔·米切尔(Cleta Mitchell)牵头,米切尔是一名律师,曾参与推翻2020年总统选举结果的相关活动。米切尔对佐治亚州富尔顿县的选票提出质疑,并与特朗普总统和佐治亚州务卿进行了通话,在通话中,总统要求他”找到”足够的选票来推翻乔·拜登在该州的胜选结果。

    FBI’s head of congressional affairs stepping down, sources say

    February 25, 2026 / 6:16 PM EST / CBS News

    Marshall Yates, who led the FBI’s congressional affairs office, is departing from the bureau, multiple sources told CBS News.

    Yates, a former Capitol Hill staffer, last year served as one of the FBI’s representatives on the Interagency Weaponization Working Group, which is composed of dozens of government officials from at least 12 different government offices who are tasked with carrying out President Trump’s quest for retribution against his political enemies, according to other sources with direct knowledge of the matter.

    Yates was one of several FBI employees assigned to the group.

    He has also been involved with the Justice Department-led Weaponization Working Group on topics including the prosecutions of Jan. 6 rioters and the potential reinstatement of fired former FBI agents who have claimed they were removed during the Biden administration for complaints about COVID-19 protocols, the Jan. 6 cases and other issues, those sources said.

    Yates’ last day is expected to be Friday, a source said. His departure was reported earlier by ProPublica.

    A source familiar with Yates’ plans told CBS News he was stepping down to spend more time with family and is working to help find his replacement.

    CBS News reached out to Yates for comment.

    As the head of congressional affairs, Yates has been the key point person for discussions with Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley.

    Over the last year, Grassley has repeatedly released a series of documents related to the FBI’s investigation into President Trump, known as “Arctic Frost,” without redacting agent names.

    After those names became public, the FBI went on to fire them.

    Among them was Walt Giardina, a former agent who worked on investigations into Trump and his political allies.

    Former Acting FBI Director Brian Driscoll and other former senior officials have filed a lawsuit filed against the FBI, alleging that the then-head of the D.C. office begged FBI Director Kash Patel and Yates in a meeting not to disclose Giardina’s name to Capitol Hill, telling them that Giardina’s wife was dying of cancer and that doing so would also “trigger a torrent of online abuse and threats of violence.”

    Giardina’s name was later released in records from Grassley’s office, and Giardina was fired.

    Yates previously worked on Capitol Hill for Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who is locked in a war of words with the Justice Department over its handling of the release of the Epstein files.

    He was also previously an aide to Congressman Mo Brooks and worked with the Election Integrity Network, a group spearheaded by Cleta Mitchell, a lawyer who was involved in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. Mitchell raised questions about ballots in Fulton County, Georgia, and participated in a call with Mr. Trump and the Georgia secretary of state, in which the president asked him to “find” enough votes to overturn Joe Biden’s victory in the state.

  • 特朗普政府”第三国”驱逐政策非法,法官裁定


    发布于2026年2月25日,美国东部时间下午5:33 / 来源:美联社

    image

    (注:此处图片为示例占位符,实际发布时请根据原文配图调整)

    Members of Venezuela’s General Directorate of Military Counterintelligence stand guard as a flight carrying migrants deported from the United States arrives at Simon Bolivar International Airport in Maiquetia, Venezuela, on January 19. Maxwell Briceno/Anadolu/Getty Images

    联邦法官周三裁定,特朗普政府将移民驱逐至与其无任何联系的”第三国”的最新政策属非法行为,必须予以废除。这起案件已上诉至美国最高法院。

    马萨诸塞州美国联邦地区法官布莱恩·E·墨菲(Brian E. Murphy)同意暂停其裁决15天,以便政府有时间对其最新裁决提出上诉。墨菲指出,美国最高法院去年曾支持政府的立场,暂停了他此前的裁决,并为载有几名移民的航班完成前往战乱中的南苏丹(他们与该国毫无联系)的行程扫清了障碍。

    墨菲表示,挑战国土安全部该政策的移民有权在被驱逐至第三国前获得”有意义的通知”并提出异议。法官总结道,该政策”在移民能够提出质疑之前就实施驱逐,从而使针对第三国遣返的有效质疑失效”。

    “这些是我们的法律,本法院怀着对生在美国的非凡幸运的深深感激,确认这些法律以及我国的基本原则:即任何’人’在这个国家都不应’在未经正当法律程序的情况下被剥夺生命、自由或财产’。”墨菲写道。

    今年6月,最高法院保守派多数派裁定,移民官员可快速将人员驱逐至第三国。自由派大法官索尼娅·索托马约尔(Sonia Sotomayor)和凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊(Ketanji Brown Jackson)对此表示异议,称该裁决给予政府特殊待遇。

    墨菲称,唐纳德·特朗普总统领导的政府多次违反——或试图违反——他的命令。他指出,去年3月,国防部在未提供他发布的临时限制令所要求的程序的情况下,将至少6名类成员驱逐至萨尔瓦多和墨西哥。国土安全部于3月30日发布了第三国驱逐的新政策指南,就在墨菲下达命令两天之后。

    “简单的事实是,没有人知道任何类成员个人诉求的是非曲直,因为(政府官员)隐瞒了基本事实:即驱逐目的地国家。”墨菲写道(他由民主党总统乔·拜登提名进入司法界)。

    墨菲表示,国土安全部的第三国驱逐政策针对的是那些已获得保护、免于被遣返至其祖国的移民——在这些国家,他们担心遭受酷刑或其他形式的迫害。

    移民和海关执法官员称,今年5月被送往南苏丹的8名男子在美国被判有罪,且已收到最终驱逐令。

    Trump administration’s ‘third country’ deportation policy is unlawful, judge rules

    Published Feb 25, 2026, 5:33 PM ET / Source: Associated Press

    Members of the Venezuela’s General Directorate of Military Counterintelligence stand guard as a flight carrying migrants deported from the United States arrives at Simon Bolivar International Airport in Maiquetia, Venezuela, on January 19.

    Maxwell Briceno/Anadolu/Getty Images

    The Trump administration’s latest policy of deporting immigrants to “third countries” to which they have no ties is unlawful and must be set aside, a federal judge ruled Wednesday in a case that already reached the nation’s highest court.

    US District Judge Brian E. Murphy in Massachusetts agreed to suspend his decision for 15 days, giving the government time to appeal his latest ruling in the case. Murphy noted that the US Supreme Court ruled in the administration’s favor last year, pausing his previous decision and clearing the way for a flight carrying several migrants to complete its trip to war-torn South Sudan, where they had no ties.

    Murphy said migrants challenging the Department of Homeland Security’s policy have the right to “meaningful notice” and an opportunity to object before they are removed to a third country. The policy “extinguishes valid challenges to third-country removal by effecting removal before those challenges can be raised,” the judge concluded.

    “These are our laws, and it is with profound gratitude for the unbelievable luck of being born in the United States of America that this Court affirms these and our nation’s bedrock principle: that no ‘person’ in this country may be ‘deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law,’” Murphy wrote.

    In June, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority found that immigration officials can quickly deport people to third countries. Liberal justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, saying the ruling gives the government special treatment.

    Murphy said President Donald Trump’s administration has repeatedly violated — or tried to violate — his orders. Last March, he noted, the Defense Department deported at least six class members to El Salvador and Mexico without providing the process required under a temporary restraining order that Murphy issued. DHS issued its new policy guidance for third-country removals on March 30, two days after Murphy’s order.

    “The simple reality is that nobody knows the merits of any individual class member’s claim because (administration officials) are withholding the predicate fact: the country of removal,” wrote Murphy, who was nominated to the bench by Democratic President Joe Biden.

    Murphy said the DHS third-country removal policy has targeted immigrants who were granted protection from being sent back to their home countries, where they feared being tortured or persecuted in other ways.

    Eight men who were sent to South Sudan in May had been convicted of crimes in the US and had final orders of removal, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials have said.

  • 古巴:美籍快艇闯古巴领海并开火 边防队还击打死四人


    2026年2月26日 07:06 / 联合早报

    古巴海岸警卫队在古巴海岸附近与一艘美国注册的快艇发生交火,造成四人死亡,六人受伤。

    事件发生在古巴比亚克拉拉省附近领海内,法新社引述古巴内务部星期三(2月25日)在哈瓦那发布的通报称,当一艘边防警卫队船只靠近这艘佛罗里达州注册的快艇以核实乘客身份时,“船上有人开枪”,导致古巴船只的船长受伤。

    内政部说,“冲突导致四名外方人员死亡,另有六人受伤”,并补充说,伤者已疏散并接受了医疗救助。

    通报没有提及外方袭击者身份。内务部说,主管部门正在调查这一事件。

    佛州将对枪击事件展开调查

    美国佛罗里达州总检察长说,政府已对古巴边防警卫队枪杀四人的事件展开调查。

    在古巴当局称该快艇“非法”并称遭到枪击后,总检察长詹姆斯·乌斯迈尔(James Uthmeier)在社交媒体上发帖称:“我已经指示州检察办公室与联邦、州和执法部门的合作伙伴合作,展开调查。”

    乌斯迈尔是首名就此事件发表评论的美国官员,他说,古巴政府不可信赖,佛州将竭尽全力追究责任。

    新华社报道,现阶段,古巴与美国关系紧张加剧。1月29日,美国总统特朗普签署行政令,威胁对向古巴提供石油国家的输美商品加征从价关税。2月6日,古巴宣布一系列措施应对美国新一轮石油封锁。

    古巴:美籍快艇闯古巴领海并开火 边防队还击打死四人

    2026年2月26日 07:06 / 联合早报

    古巴海岸警卫队在古巴海岸附近与一艘美国注册的快艇发生交火,造成四人死亡,六人受伤。

    事件发生在在古巴比亚克拉拉省附近领海内,法新社引述古巴内务部星期三(2月25日)在哈瓦那发布的通报称,当一艘边防警卫队船只靠近这艘佛罗里达州注册的快艇以核实乘客身份时,“船上有人开枪”,导致古巴船只的船长受伤。

    内政部说,“冲突导致四名外方人员死亡,另有六人受伤”,并补充说,伤者已疏散并接受了医疗救助。

    通报没有提及外方袭击者身份。内务部说,主管部门正在调查这一事件。

    佛州将对枪击事件展开调查

    美国佛罗里达州总检察长说,政府已对古巴边防警卫队枪杀四人的事件展开调查。

    在古巴当局称该快艇“非法”并称遭到枪击后,总检察长詹姆斯·乌斯迈尔(James Uthmeier)在社交媒体上发帖称:“我已经指示州检察办公室与联邦、州和执法部门的合作伙伴合作,展开调查。”

    乌斯迈尔是首名就此事件发表评论的美国官员,他说,古巴政府不可信赖,佛州将竭尽全力追究责任。

    新华社报道,现阶段,古巴与美国关系紧张加剧。1月29日,美国总统特朗普签署行政令,威胁对向古巴提供石油国家的输美商品加征从价关税。2月6日,古巴宣布一系列措施应对美国新一轮石油封锁。

  • Anthropic与五角大楼争执背后的原因


    2026年2月25日 / 美国东部时间下午6:33 / CBS新闻

    华盛顿 — 本周五角大楼向Anthropic发出最后通牒:要么允许美军无限制使用其人工智能技术,要么将失去所有政府合同。

    争议的核心在于谁有权控制人工智能模型的使用——是五角大楼还是公司首席执行官。

    五角大楼的AI合同


    去年7月,五角大楼与Anthropic签订了一份2亿美元的合同,用于开发有助于提升美国国家安全的人工智能能力。

    包括OpenAI、谷歌和xAI在内的Anthropic竞争对手去年也获得了五角大楼2亿美元的合同。

    Anthropic目前是唯一通过与数据分析巨头Palantir合作,将其模型部署在五角大楼机密网络上的AI公司。

    一位五角大楼高级官员告诉CBS新闻,由埃隆·马斯克的xAI公司开发的Grok已被允许在机密环境中使用,其他AI公司也在接近这一步。

    五角大楼上月宣布,计划加快人工智能的应用,称该技术可以帮助军方”快速处理情报数据”并”提高作战人员的杀伤力和效率”。

    监管限制的冲突


    据报道,五角大楼与Anthropic的僵局是由美军在1月份抓捕前委内瑞拉总统尼古拉斯·马杜罗的行动中使用其名为Claude的技术引发的。

    消息人士告诉CBS新闻,Anthropic多次要求五角大楼同意某些监管限制,其中包括禁止使用Claude对美国民众进行大规模监控。

    知情人士透露,该公司还希望确保五角大楼不会在军事行动中未经人类干预就使用Claude做出最终目标决策。消息人士称,Claude存在幻觉风险,无法避免致命错误,比如在没有人类判断的情况下发生意外升级或任务失败。

    当被要求置评时,一位五角大楼高级官员表示:”这与大规模监控和自主武器使用无关。五角大楼只下达合法命令。”

    五角大楼官员向Anthropic表达了担忧,即该公司的监管限制可能会阻碍关键行动,例如应对针对美国的洲际弹道导弹。

    负责研究的国防部副部长埃米尔·迈克尔在2月份的一次活动中表示:”任何公司施加的限制都可能造成这样一种情况:我们开始使用这些模型并习惯其运作方式,而当紧急情况需要使用时,我们却被阻止使用。”

    关于当AI被用于打击或杀害军事目标并犯错时,责任在谁——军方还是AI公司——一位国防官员表示:合法性由作为最终用户的五角大楼负责。

    高层领导的表态


    Anthropic首席执行官达里奥·阿莫迪(Dario Amodei)一直直言表达对AI潜在危险的担忧,并将公司品牌定位在安全和透明上。

    上个月,阿莫迪在一篇长文中警告称AI技术存在滥用风险,他写道:”一个强大的AI可以分析数百万人的数十亿对话,评估公众情绪,发现潜在的不忠迹象并在其形成之前加以压制。”

    “民主国家通常有防止军事和情报机构转向针对本国民众的保障措施,但由于AI工具只需少数人操作,有可能规避这些保障措施和支持它们的规范。值得注意的是,一些民主国家的这些保障措施已经在逐渐削弱。”

    阿莫迪长期以来支持他所谓的”合理AI监管”,包括要求AI公司透明化其模型的风险和缓解措施。

    与此同时,特朗普政府倾向于更宽松的监管,并认为严格的AI法规会扼杀创新,使美国AI产业更难竞争。该政府试图阻止所谓的”过度”州级监管。去年曾有一段时间,风险投资家、白宫AI和加密货币顾问大卫·萨克斯指责Anthropic”散布恐惧”,称其对AI监管的兴趣是为了自身利益。

    1月份,国防部长彼得·赫格塞斯(Pete Hegseth)抨击他认为”注入社会正义因素会限制和混淆我们对这项技术的使用”。

    “我们不会使用不允许我们打战争的AI模型,”赫格塞斯宣称,”我们只会用一个标准来评判AI模型:事实准确、任务相关,没有限制合法军事应用的意识形态约束。战争部AI不会’觉醒'(woke),它会为我们工作。我们正在打造准备战争的武器和系统,而不是常春藤盟校教师休息室里的聊天机器人。”

    Anthropic与五角大楼争端的下一步


    知情人士向CBS新闻透露,赫格塞斯给了Anthropic直到2月28日(周五)的期限,要求其同意允许美军无限制使用其技术,否则将面临黑名单。

    五角大楼官员正在考虑援引《国防生产法》,以国家安全为由强迫Anthropic遵守。

    消息人士称,如果无法达成协议,国防官员已讨论将该公司宣布为”供应链风险”,以推动其退出政府合作。

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/pentagon-at-odds-with-tech-company-anthropic-over-ai-model/

    What’s behind the Anthropic-Pentagon feud

    February 25, 2026 / 6:33 PM EST / CBS News

    Washington — The Pentagon gave Anthropic an ultimatum this week: Give the U.S. military unrestricted use of its AI technology or face a ban from all government contracts.

    At the center of the issue is a question of who controls how artificial intelligence models are used, the Pentagon or the company’s CEO.

    The Pentagon’s AI contracts


    The Pentagon awarded Anthropic a $200 million contract in July to develop AI capabilities that would advance U.S. national security.

    Anthropic’s rivals, including OpenAI, Google and xAI were also awarded $200 million contracts by the Pentagon last year.

    Anthropic is currently the only AI company to have its model deployed on the Pentagon’s classified networks, through a partnership with data analytics giant Palantir.

    A senior Pentagon official told CBS News that Grok, which is owned by Elon Musk’s xAI, is on board with being used in a classified setting, and other AI companies are close.

    The Pentagon announced last month that it’s looking to accelerate its uses of AI, saying the technology could help the military “rapidly convert intelligence data” and “make our Warfighters more lethal and efficient.”

    Clash over the guardrails


    The standoff between the Pentagon and Anthropic was reportedly set off by the U.S. military’s use of its technology, known as Claude, during the operation to capture former Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro in January.

    Anthropic has repeatedly asked the Pentagon to agree to certain guardrails, among them a restriction on using Claude to conduct mass surveillance of Americans, sources told CBS News.

    And the company also wants to ensure Claude is not used by the Pentagon for final targeting decisions in military operations without any human involvement, one source familiar with the matter said. Claude is not immune from hallucinations and not reliable enough to avoid potentially lethal mistakes, like unintended escalation or mission failure without human judgment, the source said.

    When asked for comment, a senior Pentagon official said: “This has nothing to do with mass surveillance and autonomous weapons being used. The Pentagon has only given out lawful orders.”

    Pentagon officials have expressed concerns to Anthropic that the company’s guardrails could stand in the way of critical actions, such as responding to an intercontinental ballistic missile launched toward the United States.

    Any company-imposed restrictions “could create a dynamic where we start using them and get used to how those models work, and when it comes that we need to use it in an urgent situation, we’re prevented from using it,” Emil Michael, the undersecretary of defense for research, said at an event in February.

    On the question of when AI is used to strike or kill military targets and makes a mistake, who is liable — the military or the AI company — a defense official said: Legality is the Pentagon’s responsibility as the end user.

    What top leaders are saying


    Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has been vocal in expressing his concerns about the potential dangers of AI and has centered the company’s brand around safety and transparency.

    In a lengthy essay last month, Amodei warned of the potential for abuse of the technologies, writing that “a powerful AI looking across billions of conversations from millions of people could gauge public sentiment, detect pockets of disloyalty forming, and stamp them out before they grow.”

    “Democracies normally have safeguards that prevent their military and intelligence apparatus from being turned inwards against their own population, but because AI tools require so few people to operate, there is potential for them to circumvent these safeguards and the norms that support them. It is also worth noting that some of these safeguards are already gradually eroding in some democracies,” he wrote.

    Amodei has long backed what he describes as “sensible AI regulation,” including rules that would require AI companies to be transparent about the risks posed by their models and any steps taken to mitigate them.

    The Trump administration, meanwhile, has favored a lighter touch, and has argued that stringent AI regulations could stifle innovation and make it harder for the American AI industry to compete. The administration has sought to block what it calls “excessive” state-level regulations. At one point last year, venture capitalist and White House AI and crypto adviser David Sacks accused Anthropic of “fear-mongering” and suggested its interest in AI regulations is self-serving.

    In a January speech, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth derided what he views as “social justice infusions that constrain and confuse our employment of this technology.”

    “We will not employ AI models that won’t allow you to fight wars,” Hegseth declared. “We will judge AI models on this standard alone; factually accurate, mission relevant, without ideological constraints that limit lawful military applications. Department of War AI will not be woke. It will work for us. We’re building war-ready weapons and systems, not chatbots for an Ivy League faculty lounge.”

    What’s next in the Anthropic v. Pentagon saga


    Hegseth gave Anthropic until Friday, Feb. 28, to agree to give the U.S. military unrestricted use of its technology or risk being blacklisted, sources familiar with the situation told CBS News.

    Pentagon officials are considering invoking the Defense Production Act to compel Anthropic to comply on national security grounds.

    Or, if an agreement can’t be reached, defense officials have discussed declaring the company a “supply chain risk” to push it out of government, according to the sources.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/pentagon-at-odds-with-tech-company-anthropic-over-ai-model/

  • 分析:听拜登2024年国情咨文演讲与特朗普2026年国情咨文演讲在经济议题上的相似之处 | 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)政治频道


    2026-02-25T22:36:35.829Z / 美国有线电视新闻网

    分析:听拜登2024年国情咨文演讲与特朗普2026年国情咨文演讲在经济议题上的相似之处

    分析:听拜登2024年国情咨文演讲与特朗普2026年国情咨文演讲在经济议题上的相似之处

    -2:09

    字幕

    • 关闭
    • 英语辅助字幕

    音频

    • 英语

    视频广告反馈

    分析:听拜登2024年国情咨文演讲与特朗普2026年国情咨文演讲在经济议题上的相似之处

    美国有线电视新闻网的卡西·亨特(Kasie Hunt)分析了现任总统唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)2026年国情咨文演讲中关于经济的内容与前总统乔·拜登(Joe Biden)2024年国情咨文演讲在经济议题上的相似之处。

    02:14 • 来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    今日政治新闻 12个视频

    [视频广告反馈]

    分析:听拜登2024年国情咨文演讲与特朗普2026年国情咨文演讲在经济议题上的相似之处

    2:14

    当前播放

    • 来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    [视频广告反馈]

    德州提前投票的可能性分析

    3:18

    当前播放

    • 来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    [视频广告反馈]

    特朗普就伊朗核武器问题发出警告

    1:00

    当前播放

    • 来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    [视频广告反馈]

    当特朗普抨击民主党移民政策时,众议员伊尔汗·奥马尔(Ilhan Omar)大声疾呼

    0:18

    当前播放

    • 来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    [视频广告反馈]

    2028年民主党潜在候选人分析

    3:07

    当前播放

    • 来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    [视频广告反馈]

    为何美国男子冰球队在与特朗普通话后遭到抨击

    4:39

    当前播放

    • 来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    [视频广告反馈]

    一位首席执行官如何赢得特朗普的多样性战争

    2:29

    当前播放

    • 来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    [视频广告反馈]

    “为什么我拿不到退款?”:喜剧演员对最高法院关于特朗普关税的裁决作出反应

    1:09

    当前播放

    • 来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    [视频广告反馈]

    达娜·巴什(Dana Bash)向贝森特部长施压,询问国会在实施关税中的作用

    2:26

    当前播放

    • 来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    [视频广告反馈]

    挑战特朗普关税的企业主对最高法院裁决作出回应

    4:32

    当前播放

    • 来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    新墨西哥州启动“真相委员会”调查爱泼斯坦牧场,委员会主席发声

    5:17

    当前播放

    • 来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    [视频广告反馈]

    特朗普抨击裁定其关税违宪的大法官

    2:02

    当前播放

    • 来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    查看更多视频

    Analysis: Hear the similarities between Biden’s 2024 SOTU address and Trump’s 2026 SOTU address on the economy | CNN Politics

    2026-02-25T22:36:35.829Z / CNN

    Analysis: Hear the similarities between Biden’s 2024 SOTU address and Trump’s 2026 SOTU address on the economy

    Analysis: Hear the similarities between Biden’s 2024 SOTU address and Trump’s 2026 SOTU address on the economy

    -2:09

    Subtitles

    • Off

    • English CC

    Audio

    • English

    Video Ad Feedback

    Analysis: Hear the similarities between Biden’s 2024 SOTU address and Trump’s 2026 SOTU address on the economy

    CNN’s Kasie Hunt breaks down the similarities between President Donald Trump’s 2026 State of the Union address on the economy and former President Joe Biden’s 2024 address.

    02:14 • Source: CNN

    Politics of the Day 12 videos

    Video Ad Feedback

    Analysis: Hear the similarities between Biden’s 2024 SOTU address and Trump’s 2026 SOTU address on the economy

    2:14

    Now playing

    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    The Odds: Early voting in Texas

    3:18

    Now playing

    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    Trump issues warning to Iran on nuclear weapons

    1:00

    Now playing

    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    Rep. Ilhan Omar shouts as Trump slams Democrats on immigration

    0:18

    Now playing

    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    The Odds: 2028 Potential Democratic contenders

    3:07

    Now playing

    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    Why US men’s hockey team is under fire after call with Trump

    4:39

    Now playing

    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    How one CEO is winning Trump’s war on diversity

    2:29

    Now playing

    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    ‘Why can’t I get my refund?’: Comedians react to Supreme Court’s ruling on Trump’s tariffs

    1:09

    Now playing

    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    Dana Bash presses Secretary Bessent on Congress’ role in enacting tariffs

    2:26

    Now playing

    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    Business owner who challenged Trump’s tariffs reacts to Supreme Court decision

    4:32

    Now playing

    • Source: CNN

    New Mexico launches ‘truth commission’ to probe Epstein’s ranch; it’s chair speaks out

    5:17

    Now playing

    • Source: CNN

    Video Ad Feedback

    Trump attacks justices who ruled against his tariffs

    2:02

    Now playing

    • Source: CNN

    See more videos

湘ICP备2026001899号-2