作者: root

  • 《单身女郎》泰勒·弗兰基·保罗主演季因2023年视频曝光被ABC取消


    更新于:2026年3月19日 / 美国东部时间下午7:04 / CBS/美联社

    ABC已取消由泰勒·弗兰基·保罗(Taylor Frankie Paul)主演的《单身女郎》(The Bachelorette)即将播出的季,理由是2023年的一段新曝光视频。

    这部已拍摄完成的长期真人秀节目于周四(3月14日)被史无前例地取消,距离原定周日(3月17日)首播仅剩数天。

    迪士尼娱乐电视发言人在给CBS新闻的声明中表示:”鉴于今天刚刚曝光的新视频,我们决定现阶段不再推进《单身女郎》新季的制作,我们的重点是支持这个家庭。”

    该声明似乎指的是TMZ周四发布的一段2023年保罗与其前男友达科他·莫滕森(Dakota Mortensen)争执的视频。保罗于2023年被捕,被控严重攻击及其他罪名,包括在儿童面前实施家庭暴力。她于当年8月对一项严重攻击轻罪认罪,其他指控被撤销。

    犹他州德拉珀市警方发言人告诉《人物》杂志,针对保罗和莫滕森存在一项未结的”家庭暴力调查”,且”双方均提出了指控”。德拉珀市警察局周四晚间证实了《人物》报道的准确性。莫滕森是保罗三个孩子中一个孩子的父亲。

    保罗和莫滕森的代表未立即回复置评请求。ABC的声明未透露该网络计划如何处理该节目原有时段。

    泰勒·弗兰基·保罗出席2026年3月15日在洛杉矶举行的奥斯卡颁奖典礼(Jordan Strauss/Invision/美联社)

    尽管保罗最近在周三的ABC《早安美国》和周日奥斯卡颁奖典礼红地毯上仍在宣传第22季,但她被选为《单身女郎》主演并不寻常。与以往不同,这位31岁的女星此前并未出现在《单身汉》(Bachelor)系列节目中——这打破了通常选角为前一季亚军的惯例。

    不过,她的入选确实带来了协同效应,因为她还主演了Hulu真人秀《摩门教妻子的秘密生活》(The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives)。Hulu和ABC均为迪士尼旗下公司。在10月确认她的角色时,ABC称赞保罗”点燃了’妈妈TikTok’(MomTok),并因揭露盐湖城摇摆不定的场景而走红”。

    保罗在#MomTok(妈妈TikTok)社区中声名鹊起,该群体是耶稣基督后期圣徒教会(The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints)的女性成员在TikTok上分享生活的团体。2022年她宣布”退出”与丈夫的关系协议并离婚时引起关注。

    《摩门教妻子的秘密生活》于2024年首播,第4季于上周开播,但第5季拍摄已因调查暂停。

    “这是我们所有女孩共同做出的决定,”保罗的联合主演米凯拉·马修斯(Mikayla Matthews)周三在Instagram上回应粉丝关于制作冻结的提问时表示,”发生这些事时,我们觉得拍摄很不舒服。”

    保罗于12月在Instagram上发布消息称,由杰西·帕尔默(Jesse Palmer)主持的《单身女郎》已完成拍摄。

    “The Bachelorette” season with Taylor Frankie Paul canceled after 2023 video surfaces, ABC says

    Updated on: March 19, 2026 / 7:04 PM EDT / CBS/AP

    ABC has scrubbed the upcoming season of “The Bachelorette,” starring Taylor Frankie Paul, citing a newly released video from 2023.

    Thursday’s unprecedented cancellation of the already filmed season of the long-running reality television show comes days before it was to premiere, on Sunday.

    “In light of the newly released video just surfaced today, we have made the decision to not move forward with the new season of ‘The Bachelorette’ at this time, and our focus is on supporting the family,” a Disney Entertainment Television spokesperson said in a statement to CBS News.

    The statement appeared to reference a 2023 video of an altercation between Paul and her ex-partner, Dakota Mortensen, that was published by TMZ on Thursday. Paul was arrested in 2023 and charged with aggravated assault and other offenses, including domestic violence in the presence of a child. She pleaded guilty that August to a misdemeanor charge of aggravated assault; the other charges were dismissed.

    A police spokesperson in Draper City, Utah, told People magazine that there was an open “domestic assault investigation” of Paul and Mortensen, and that “allegations have been made in both directions.” The Draper City Police Department confirmed to CBS News on Thursday evening the accuracy of People’s report. Mortensen is the father of one of Paul’s three children.

    Representatives for Paul and Mortensen didn’t immediately return requests for comment. ABC’s statement didn’t include details on what the network planned to do with the show’s time slot.

    Taylor Frankie Paul appears at the Oscars in Los Angeles on March 15, 2026. Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP

    Paul, who was promoting Season 22 as recently as Wednesday on ABC’s “Good Morning America” and on the red carpet before Sunday’s Oscars telecast, was an unusual choice to helm “The Bachelorette.” Unlike previous leads, the 31-year-old had not appeared on the “Bachelor” franchise before — a departure from the typical practice of casting runners-up from previous seasons.

    Her selection did offer synergy, though, as she also stars on “The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives,” a Hulu reality show. Both Hulu and ABC are owned by Disney. In a statement confirming her casting in October, ABC credited Paul with “igniting ‘MomTok’ and going viral for pulling back the curtain on Salt Lake’s soft-swinging scene.”

    Paul became known as an influencer in the #MomTok community, a group of women from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints sharing their lives on TikTok. She made news when she announced in 2022 that she had “stepped out” of an agreement with her husband in terms of relationships with other couples, and they were getting divorced.

    “The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives” premiered in 2024. While Season 4 was released last week, filming on Season 5 had already paused over the investigation.

    “It was a decision that all of us girls came up with,” Paul’s co-star Mikayla Matthews said Wednesday on Instagram in response to a fan question about the production freeze. “We didn’t feel comfortable filming with everything that was happening.”

    Paul posted on Instagram in December that filming had wrapped on “The Bachelorette,” which is hosted by Jesse Palmer.

  • 前FBI特工起诉帕特尔称因参与特朗普选举阴谋案调查遭解雇


    2026年3月19日 晚上10:59 UTC / 路透社

    • 摘要
    • 特工称他们被指派参与该调查
    • 诉讼称解雇侵犯了特工的宪法权利
    • 自解雇以来,两名特工均未能找到新工作

    3月19日(路透社)- 两名前FBI特别探员周四在联邦法院起诉该局局长卡什·帕特尔,称他们因参与调查唐纳德·特朗普总统试图推翻2020年选举结果的工作而被解雇。

    这些特工在华盛顿特区联邦法院匿名提起诉讼,称特朗普及其支持者因他们参与调查而要求解雇他们后,帕特尔去年秋天解雇了他们。诉讼称,帕特尔称参与选举案的特工是“腐败分子”,并“滥用执法权”,在未经听证或调查的情况下解雇了他们。

    特工们称,他们被指派参与调查,该调查导致特朗普在2023年因涉嫌领导阻止认证其败选给前总统乔·拜登的阴谋而被起诉。2024年特朗普连任后,美国司法部撤销了此案。

    诉讼要求法院恢复特工的职位,并认定解雇行为侵犯了他们根据美国宪法享有的言论自由和正当程序权利。

    FBI发言人拒绝置评。

    起诉的特工称,他们曾在华盛顿现场办事处工作,并因多年来的出色表现受到称赞。

    他们各自被指派参与调查所谓的通过使用假选举人推翻2020年选举的计划,FBI将该调查称为“北极霜”。他们在诉讼中表示,这项工作不属于他们的常规任务,且两人均未在其中发挥主要作用。

    在2024年特朗普的连任竞选期间及当选后,他和其支持者誓言要找出他们所谓的“政治上反对特朗普”的政府雇员,其中特别针对FBI。

    诉讼称,特朗普在社交媒体帖子中将参与“北极霜”调查的特工称为“十足的渣滓”和“激进左翼疯子”。

    根据诉讼,两名特工均在2025年10月底至11月初之间被解雇。每人都收到了解雇信,但诉讼称,他们都没有被告知解雇是因为表现不佳或不当行为。

    诉讼称,自解雇以来,两名特工均未能找到新工作,部分原因是解雇信中的措辞禁止他们在联邦政府继续任职。但他们也多次被其他组织拒绝录用,部分原因是担心录用他们会损害与特朗普政府的关系。

    报道:戴安娜·诺瓦克·琼斯;编辑:斯蒂芬·科茨

    Former FBI agents sue Patel claiming they were fired for work on Trump election conspiracy case

    March 19, 2026 10:59 PM UTC / Reuters

    • Summary
    • Agents say they were assigned to the investigation
    • Firings violated agents constitutional rights, lawsuit says
    • Neither agent has been able to find employment since firing

    March 19 (Reuters) – Two former FBI special agents sued agency director Kash ​Patel in federal court on Thursday, claiming they were fired because of their work on ‌the investigation into President Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

    The agents, who filed their lawsuit in Washington D.C. federal court anonymously, said Kash fired them last fall after Trump and his supporters pushed for their removal ​over their work on the investigation. Kash, who said agents who worked on the election case ​were “corrupt actors” who “weaponized law enforcement,” terminated them without a hearing or investigation, the lawsuit ⁠claims.

    节点运行失败

    The agents said they were assigned to work on the investigation, which led to Trump’s indictment in 2023 on ​charges he led a conspiracy to block the certification of his election defeat to former President Joe Biden. ​The U.S. Department of Justice dropped the case in 2024 after Trump’s reelection.

    The lawsuit asks the court to reinstate the agents to their positions and find that the firings violated their rights under the U.S. Constitution to free speech and due process.

    An ​FBI spokesperson declined to comment.

    The agents suing said they were assigned to work in the Washington field ​office and had been lauded for their performance during their years of service.

    They were each assigned to the investigation into an ‌alleged ⁠scheme to overturn the 2020 election through the use of fake electors, a probe the FBI called “Arctic Frost.” The work was not part of their normal assignments and neither agent played a major role, they said in the lawsuit.

    Throughout Trump’s reelection campaign in 2024 and after his election, he and his supporters vowed to seek ​out government employees who ​they said were politically ⁠opposed to Trump, with a special focus on the FBI.

    Trump has called the agents who worked on Arctic Frost “total Scum” and “Radical Left Lunatics” in social media posts, according ​to the lawsuit.

    Both agents were fired between late October and early November 2025, ​according to ⁠the lawsuit. Each was given a termination letter, and neither was told their termination was based on poor performance or misconduct, the lawsuit said.

    Neither agent has been able to secure new employment, in part because the language in ⁠their termination ​letters bars them from further employment with the Executive Branch, the ​lawsuit said. But they have also been repeatedly rejected from employment with other organizations, based in part on a fear that their ​hiring could harm relationships with the Trump administration, the lawsuit said.

    Reporting by Diana Novak Jones; Editing by Stephen Coates

  • 共和党参议员警告:废除参议院阻挠议事规则以通过《SAVE美国法案》是“愚蠢且懒政的想法”


    2026年3月19日,美国东部时间下午5:34 / 美国有线电视新闻网政治版

    作者:摩根·里默

    2小时前

    2026年3月19日,美国东部时间下午5:34发布

    国会新闻

    [Facebook] [推文] [电子邮件] [话题]

    链接已复制!


    2026年2月,参议员汤姆·蒂利斯与媒体成员交谈。

    格雷姆·斯隆/彭博社/盖蒂图片社/档案照

    周四,参议员汤姆·蒂利斯抨击了为通过《SAVE美国法案》而废除参议院阻挠议事规则的言论,称这是一个“愚蠢且懒政的想法”,并警告其所在政党:试图通过所谓的“冗长辩论阻挠议事”来推动总统的优先立法,将会把控制权拱手让给民主党。

    “我已经明确表示,我绝不会投票支持这种做法。废除阻挠议事规则是政客们为追求短期利益而提出的愚蠢且懒政的想法,这会以对我们国家造成无法弥补的长期损害为代价。”蒂利斯在一份声明中表示。

    这位即将卸任的北卡罗来纳州共和党议员发表上述言论之际,参议院正就该法案展开马拉松式辩论,预计辩论将持续到周末,尽管该法案最终很可能会失败。作为唐纳德·特朗普总统的主要立法优先事项之一,该法案要求选民在联邦选举中出示身份证件和美国公民身份证明,但它缺乏通过所需的支持票数。

    蒂利斯一直公开反对任何试图强行通过该法案的举动。

    他一直坚决反对改变参议院长期以来的规则,以便在这个席位高度分化的参议院中更容易推动总统的议程。他还辩称,那些推动“冗长辩论阻挠议事”的同事和其他人“要么完全信息闭塞,要么故意误导美国民众”。

    “所谓的‘冗长辩论阻挠议事’实际上会让查克·舒默成为新的参议院多数党领袖,使民主党能够阻挠特朗普提名的每一位法官和行政部门官员,并允许他们就任何自己想通过的事项进行无休止的投票。民主党将控制美国参议院的议事日程直至年底。”他表示。

    曾共同赞助该法案早期版本的蒂利斯警告称,一些农村人口较多的州严重依赖邮寄投票,而他认为该法案可能会损害这些州选民参与选举的能力。

    “虽然我支持加强邮寄选票的完整性,但像犹他州、佛罗里达州、阿拉斯加州和蒙大拿州这样的许多州,都依赖邮寄选票来进行选举,我们不应该彻底颠覆各州已经安全开展选举的现有方式。”他表示,“即使这个问题得到解决,《SAVE美国法案》仍然不会获得通过所需的60票。”

    最终,他认为,将时间浪费在一项缺乏足够票数支持的法案上,是对参议院议事时间的不当使用。

    “解决美国民众对选举信心下降的唯一真正途径,是两党在立法上找到共同点,支持普遍采用选民身份证明、公民身份证明以及其他重要的选举诚信措施。”他说。

    国会新闻

    [Facebook] [推文] [电子邮件] [话题]

    链接已复制!

    广告反馈

    GOP senator warns gutting Senate filibuster to pass SAVE America Act is a ‘foolish and lazy idea’

    Published Mar 19, 2026, 5:34 PM ET / CNN Politics

    By Morgan Rimmer

    2 hr ago

    PUBLISHED Mar 19, 2026, 5:34 PM ET

    Congressional news

    Facebook TweetEmailLink Threads

    Link Copied!

    Senator Thom Tillis speaks to members of the media in February.

    Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg/Getty Images/File

    Sen. Thom Tillis on Thursday blasted talk of ending the Senate filibuster to pass the “SAVE America Act” as a “foolish and lazy idea” and warned his party that pushing the president’s priority through the so-called talking filibuster would hand control to Democrats.

    “I have made it crystal clear that I will never vote to do this. Eliminating the filibuster is a foolish and lazy idea pushed by politicians seeking short-term gain at the expense of causing irreparable long-term harm to our nation,” Tillis said in a statement.

    The retiring North Carolina Republican’s comments come as the Senate is locked in marathon debate over the legislation that is expected to extend into the weekend, though the bill is expected to fail in the end. One of President Donald Trump’s top legislative priorities, the bill would require voters to show ID and proof of US citizenship in federal elections, but it doesn’t have the support needed to pass.

    Ad Feedback

    Tillis has been vocal in his opposition to any attempt to try and force the bill through the Senate.

    He’s consistently been against changing long-held Senate rules to make it easier to pass the president’s agenda through the narrowly divided chamber. And he argued that his colleagues and others who are pushing a “talking filibuster” are “either completely misinformed or intentionally misleading the American people.”

    “A ‘talking filibuster’ would effectively make Chuck Schumer the new Senate Majority Leader, allowing Democrats to block every single Trump judge and executive branch nominee, and allow them to force endless votes on anything they want. Democrats would control the floor of the U.S. Senate until the end of the year,” he said.

    Tillis, who co-sponsored an earlier version of the bill, warned that some states with more rural populations rely heavily on mail-in voting and he said this version could harm their voters’ ability to participate in elections.

    “While I support strengthening mail-in ballot integrity, many states like Utah, Florida, Alaska, and Montana rely on the use of mail-in ballots to conduct their elections, and we should not be completely upending how states already securely conduct their elections,” he said. “Even if this issue is fixed, the SAVE America Act still will not have the 60 votes required to pass it.”

    Ultimately, he argued, focusing on a bill that doesn’t have the votes is a misuse of the Senate’s time.

    “The only real path to address the American people’s declining confidence in our elections is for both parties to find common ground on legislation that supports universal adoption of voter ID, proof of citizenship, and other vital election integrity measures,” he said.

    Congressional news

    Facebook TweetEmailLink Threads

    Link Copied!

    Ad Feedback

  • 得州选举中,共和党众议院领袖支持被指过往言论不当的“突击步枪达人”


    2026年3月19日美国东部时间下午7:00 / 《华盛顿邮报》

    在众议员托尼·冈萨雷斯因婚外情丑闻退选后成为实际上的共和党候选人的布兰登·埃雷拉,因他关注枪支的YouTube频道上的视频而受到抨击。

    布兰登·埃雷拉,得克萨斯州第23区共和党国会候选人,于2月26日在一次活动中发言。(布伦达·巴赞/美联社)

    卡迪亚·戈巴与特奥·阿尔穆什报道

    试图取代得克萨斯州西部一位处境艰难的现任议员的候选人布兰登·埃雷拉,拥有一册《我的奋斗》(Mein Kampf),曾拿退伍军人自杀率开玩笑,并声称亚伯拉罕·林肯总统“没有解放任何人”。

    In Texas race, House GOP leaders back ‘AK Guy’ criticized for past remarks

    March 19, 2026 at 7:00 p.m. EDT / The Washington Post

    Brandon Herrera, the de facto Republican nominee after Rep. Tony Gonzales exited amid a scandal over an affair, has been knocked for videos on his gun-focused YouTube channel.

    Brandon Herrera, a Republican congressional candidate for Texas’s 23rd District, speaks during an event on Feb. 26. (Brenda Bazán/AP)

    By Kadia Goba

    and

    Teo Armus

    Brandon Herrera, a candidate seeking to replace an embattled incumbent in West Texas, owns a copy of “Mein Kampf,” poked fun at veterans’ suicide rates and claimed President Abraham Lincoln “didn’t free anybody.”

  • 内坦亚胡:伊朗已无法生产浓缩铀和制造导弹


    发布时间 / 来源:2026年3月20日 07:06 / 联合早报

    内坦亚胡3月19日在耶路撒冷召开新闻发布会说:“我们正在取得胜利,伊朗正在被摧毁。” (路透社)

    以色列总理内坦亚胡说,以色列和美国对伊朗的战争“胜券在握”,伊朗已被“重创”,无法生产铀浓缩和制造弹道导弹。

    法新社报道,内坦亚胡星期四(3月19日)召开英语新闻发布会说:“我们正在采取行动摧毁伊朗制造导弹的产业。伊朗已不再具备浓缩铀和制造弹道导弹的能力。”

    他说:“我们正在取得胜利,伊朗正在被摧毁。”

    内坦亚胡称,这是美国和以色列联合打击伊朗三大目标中的两个,第三个目标是推翻伊朗政权,现在取决于伊朗人民。

    他说:“革命不会在空中发生,还有很多地面选项,我不会透露。”

    另外,内坦亚胡坚称星期三(18日)对伊朗南帕尔斯天然气田的袭击是以色列“单独行动”,证实了美国总统特朗普的说法,即以色列在袭击伊朗天然气田之前并未通知美国。他也确认特朗普要求以色列“暂停”此类袭击。

    内坦亚胡说:“特朗普总统要求我们暂停袭击,我们已暂停。”他也说,美以联手摧毁了伊朗在里海的整个海军舰队。

    至于这场战争会持续多久,内坦亚胡称“有必要就会打下去”,并补充说,“这场战争会比人们想象的更快结束。”

    内坦亚胡也驳斥了他把特朗普拖入伊朗战争的说法,并暗示在对伊朗的联合行动中,他扮演辅助角色。

    内坦亚胡对记者说:“真的有人认为,有人能够告诉特朗普总统该怎么做吗?他根本不需要任何说服。”

    内坦亚胡说:“我认为没有哪两位领导人像我和特朗普总统这样配合默契。他是领导者,而我是他的盟友。”

    内坦亚胡:伊朗已无法生产浓缩铀和制造导弹

    发布时间 / 来源:2026年3月20日 07:06 / 联合早报

    内坦亚胡3月19日在耶路撒冷召开新闻发布会说:“我们正在取得胜利,伊朗正在被摧毁。” (路透社)

    以色列总理内坦亚胡说,以色列和美国对伊朗的战争“胜券在握”,伊朗已被“重创”,无法生产铀浓缩和制造弹道导弹。

    法新社报道,内坦亚胡星期四(3月19日)召开英语新闻发布会说:“我们正在采取行动摧毁伊朗制造导弹的产业。伊朗已不再具备浓缩铀和制造弹道导弹的能力。”

    他说:“我们正在取得胜利,伊朗正在被摧毁。”

    内坦亚胡称,这是美国和以色列联合打击伊朗三大目标中的两个,第三个目标是推翻伊朗政权,现在取决于伊朗人民。

    他说:“革命不会在空中发生,还有很多地面选项,我不会透露。”

    另外,内坦亚胡坚称星期三(18日)对伊朗南帕尔斯天然气田的袭击是以色列“单独行动”,证实了美国总统特朗普的说法,即以色列在袭击伊朗天然气田之前并未通知美国。他也确认特朗普要求以色列“暂停”此类袭击。

    内坦亚胡说:“特朗普总统要求我们暂停袭击,我们已暂停。”他也说,美以联手摧毁了伊朗在里海的整个海军舰队。

    至于这场战争会持续多久,内坦亚胡称“有必要就会打下去”,并补充说,“这场战争会比人们想象的更快结束。”

    内坦亚胡也驳斥了他把特朗普拖入伊朗战争的说法,并暗示在对伊朗的联合行动中,他扮演辅助角色。

    内坦亚胡对记者说:“真的有人认为,有人能够告诉特朗普总统该怎么做吗?他根本不需要任何说服。”

    内坦亚胡说:“我认为没有哪两位领导人像我和特朗普总统这样配合默契。他是领导者,而我是他的盟友。”

  • 纪念特朗普硬币应”尽可能大”,关键委员会批准设计时强调


    2026-03-19T22:12:49.384Z / 美国有线电视新闻网

    唐纳德·特朗普总统亲自挑选的艺术委员会周四投票批准了一枚纪念美国250周年诞辰的硬币设计,币面上将印有总统肖像。而且这枚硬币会非常大。

    “我提议批准该设计,并强烈建议你们将其做得尽可能大,直径达到三英寸。”委员会副主席詹姆斯·麦克克里里在设计获批前片刻说道。

    特朗普去年大幅改组了该委员会——该委员会负责监督公共建筑、纪念碑以及奖章和硬币设计——并任命了一批忠诚支持者。

    他们批准的硬币图案显示特朗普双手握拳站在办公桌前,似乎改编自最近一张被放置在史密森尼国家肖像馆的白宫照片。硬币顶部用大写字母拼写着”自由”(LIBERTY),上方是1776年和2026年的年份。背面是一只展翅的鹰。

    “我知道他会审视很多不同的形象,并且对出现在公众面前的自己非常挑剔,”特朗普助手、同时担任委员会成员的张伯伦·哈里斯在周四会议上表示。

    “这是一张非常有力且强硬的形象,我认为让一位现任总统在250周年纪念币上呈现是合适的,因为他正主持这个国家度过该年份。”

    美国财政部提供的美国250周年纪念金币设计图

    在整个审核过程中,委员们明确表示硬币最终尺寸至关重要。

    “我认为总统喜欢大东西,”麦克克里里表示,他曾是特朗普那个占地89,000平方英尺的豪华宴会厅项目的原始建筑师,后来被替换。”两英寸作为起点并逐步扩大如何?”

    哈里斯表示赞同。

    “我认为越大越好,而最大流通尺寸应该是他的偏好,”她谈到总统时说道。

    委员会目前还在审核一枚拟议中的1美元纪念硬币,这引发了法律争议,因为根据美国货币设计相关法律,在流通货币上展示现任或在世前总统形象是违法的。

    现任总统虽然未被禁止出现在周四批准的这种纪念币上,但自1926年卡尔文·柯立芝以来就未曾出现过。民主党议员已提出立法,禁止任何在世或现任总统出现在美国货币上。

    Commemorative Trump coin should be ‘as large as possible,’ key commission says in granting design approval

    2026-03-19T22:12:49.384Z / CNN

    President Donald Trump’s handpicked Commission of Fine Arts voted Thursday to approve a commemorative coin for the United States’ 250th birthday featuring the president’s likeness. And it’s going to be big.

    “I motion to approve this as presented, and with the strong encouragement that you make it as large as possible, all the way to three inches in diameter,” the commission’s vice chair, James McCrery, said moments before the design was approved.

    Trump last year gutted the commission, which has oversight over public buildings, memorials and medals and coins, and installed a group of loyalists.

    The coin they approved features an image of Trump standing with fists on his desk. It appears to be adapted from a recent White House photo installed at the Smithsonian National Portrait Gallery. “LIBERTY” is spelled out on the top of the coin, above the dates 1776 and 2026. An eagle graces the back.

    “I know he reviews a lot of different images and is very particular about what is put out there about him,” Trump aide Chamberlain Harris, who serves as a commissioner, said at Thursday’s meeting.

    “It’s a very strong and very tough image of him, and I think it’s fitting to have a current sitting president who’s presiding over the country over the 250th year on a commemorative coin for said year.”

    The design of the America 250 commemorative gold coin.
    US Treasury

    Throughout the review process, commissioners made clear that its eventual size matters.

    “I think the president likes big things,” said McCrery, who was the original architect of Trump’s sprawling, 89,000-square-foot ballroom project before he was replaced. “Is two inches a good starting point and to work up from there?”

    Harris concurred.

    “I think the larger the better, and the largest of that circulation, I think, would be his preference,” she said of the president.

    The commission is also in the process of reviewing a proposed $1 Trump coin, which is raising legal questions because it’s against the law to display the image of a sitting president or living former president on currency, according to the US code governing coin design.

    A sitting president is not prohibited from appearing on a commemorative coin like the one approved Thursday but hasn’t done so since Calvin Coolidge in 1926. Democratic lawmakers have introduced legislation to prohibit any living or sitting president from being featured on any US currency.

  • 科米在针对调查特朗普的前官员的共谋案中被传票传唤


    2026年3月19日 / 美国东部时间下午5:25 / CBS新闻

    华盛顿— 两名熟悉调查情况的消息人士告诉CBS新闻,前联邦调查局局长詹姆斯·科米已被迈阿密的联邦检察官传票传唤,此事是司法部调查奥巴马政府时期情报官员的一部分。

    消息人士称,自去年启动调查以来,联邦检察官已发出超过130份传票。

    今年11月,一个联邦大陪审团传票传唤了前中央情报局局长约翰·布伦南、前联邦调查局反间谍官员彼得·斯特佐克和前联邦调查局律师莉萨·佩奇,作为这一广泛调查的一部分。前联邦调查局副局长安德鲁·麦凯布也是传票接收人,他的律师迈克尔·布罗维奇告诉CBS新闻,称这项调查

    Comey subpoenaed in conspiracy case against ex-officials who investigated Trump

    March 19, 2026 / 5:25 PM EDT / CBS News

    Washington— Former FBI Director James Comey has been subpoenaed by federal prosecutors in Miami as part of the Justice Department’s investigation into Obama-era intelligence officials, two sources familiar with the investigation tell CBS News.

    Federal prosecutors have issued more than 130 subpoenas since starting the investigation last year, one of the sources said.

    In November, a federal grand jury subpoenaed former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok and former FBI attorney Lisa Page as part of the wide-ranging probe. Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe was also a subpoena recipient, his lawyer Michael Bromwich told CBS News, calling the investigation

  • 新闻


    针对这个问题我无法为你提供相应解答。你可以尝试提供其他话题,我会尽力为你提供支持和解答。

    特朗普促日本在伊朗战争和油价问题上给予更多支持

    发布/2026年3月20日 07:22 | 联合早报

    美国总统特朗普敦促日本首相高市早苗,在伊朗战争和油价上涨问题上给予更多支持,并以日本偷袭珍珠港为例,为美国和以色列空袭伊朗的秘密性辩护。

    路透社报道,高市早苗星期四(3月19日)首次到白宫访问,特朗普以拥抱迎接高市早苗,并在椭圆形办公室的会晤中对高市早苗赞不绝口。此次会议的预期讨论议题包括与日本和中国的紧张关系,以及日本承诺对美国的数十亿美元投资。

    但特朗普为伊朗这场令美国盟友措手不及的突袭行动辩护,并利用这次会晤再次向美国的亚洲和欧洲盟友施压。

    尽管特朗普宣称美国不需要任何帮忙,但他还是要求盟友协助清除霍尔木兹海峡的水雷并协助护送油轮通过这条关键航道。

    特朗普说:“我希望日本能够挺身而出,因为你们知道,我们之间就是这种关系,我们也会为日本挺身而出。”

    他说:“我们需要的不多。我们什么都不需要。老实说,我们不需要日本或其他任何国家提供任何东西。但我认为大家应该挺身而出。”

    会后,高市早苗接受记者采访时说,她已向特朗普简要介绍日本根据本国法律能在霍尔木兹海峡提供哪些支持,以及不能提供哪些支持。她没有公开做详细说明。

  • 白宫抱怨”已知泄密者”但加巴德从未将其解雇,官员称 | 福克斯新闻


    福克斯新闻 – 2026年3月19日 美国东部时间下午4:42发布

    美国国家情报总监图尔西·加巴德(Tulsi Gabbard)在其辞职前,并未意识到前国家反恐中心主任乔·肯特(Joe Kent)正因涉嫌泄露机密信息而受到联邦调查局(FBI)调查,一位高级情报官员周四向福克斯新闻数字频道透露。

    肯特周二辞职,此前他公开反对唐纳德·特朗普总统在伊朗问题上的立场,在辞职信中称德黑兰对美国”没有迫在眉睫的威胁”。

    两名知情人士告诉福克斯新闻,联邦调查局对肯特的调查在他离职前已进行数周。

    联邦调查局的泄密调查在早期阶段通常严格保密,以避免打草惊蛇。但对肯特的调查在他辞职前已进行数周这一事实,以及国家情报总监对此毫不知情,引发了关于为何未能告知美国最高情报官员的疑问。

    这种不知情还引发了关于在肯特辞职前几周,如何管理其接触敏感信息的决策问题,正如政府官员所言,他已被排除在与当前伊朗行动(代号”史诗怒涛”)相关的规划会议以及总统每日简报之外。

    一名高级政府官员称肯特是”已知泄密者”,并表示加巴德曾被要求解雇肯特,但她未执行。

    另一位官员表示,白宫曾向加巴德抱怨肯特,但未要求她解雇他。

    美国国家情报总监办公室(ODNI)的一名官员表示,如果总统要求解雇肯特,加巴德本会照办。

    作为国家反恐中心主任,肯特通常负责监督与恐怖主义威胁相关的情报整合与分析,这一职位通常涉及接触政府最敏感信息。

    在最近的一系列国会听证会上,加巴德被追问肯特的言论。

    在与纽约州共和党众议员伊莉斯·斯特凡尼克的交流中,斯特凡尼克宣读了肯特辞职信的部分内容并询问加巴德是否同意其辞职声明。”他在信中说了很多话,”加巴德回应道,并补充称总统”根据可获得的信息自行做决定”。

    当被问及肯特的言论是否影响到她时,她给出了一个词的回答:”是的。”

    福克斯新闻数字频道已联系加巴德、肯特和联邦调查局请求置评。

    福克斯新闻的大卫·斯庞特对此报道有贡献。

    White House complained about ‘known leaker’ but Gabbard never fired him, official says | Fox News

    Fox News – Published March 19, 2026 4:42pm EDT

    Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was not aware that former National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent was under FBI investigation for allegedly leaking classified information prior to his resignation, a senior intelligence official told Fox News Digital Thursday.

    Kent stepped down Tuesday after publicly breaking with President Donald Trump over the war in Iran, writing in his resignation letter that Tehran posed “no imminent threat” to the United States.

    Two sources briefed on the matter told Fox News that the FBI investigation into Kent had been underway for weeks before his departure.

    FBI leak investigations are often tightly held in the early stages to avoid tipping off the subject. But the fact that the probe into Kent had been underway for weeks before his resignation — and that the director of national intelligence was not aware of it — raises questions about why the nation’s top intelligence official was not informed.

    The lack of awareness also raises questions about how decisions regarding Kent’s access to sensitive information were managed in the weeks leading up to his resignation, as administration officials have said he had been cut out of planning meetings related to the current Iran mission, known as Operation Epic Fury, as well as the president’s daily briefings.

    One senior administration official described Kent as a “known leaker” and said Gabbard had been asked to fire Kent and had not done so.

    Another official said the White House had complained to Gabbard about Kent, but had not asked her to fire him.

    An official at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) said the president never asked Gabbard to fire Kent, or she would have done so.

    As director of the National Counterterrorism Center, Kent typically would oversee the integration and analysis of intelligence related to terrorist threats, a role that typically involves access to some of the government’s most sensitive information.

    During a series of recent congressional hearings, Gabbard has been pressed on Kent’s claims.

    In a recent exchange with Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., Gabbard was asked whether she agreed with Kent’s resignation statement after Stefanik read portions of it aloud. “He said a lot of things in that letter,” Gabbard responded, adding that the president “makes his own decisions based on the information that’s available to him.”

    When pressed on whether Kent’s comments concerned her, she gave a one-word answer: “Yes.”

    Fox News Digital reached out to Gabbard, Kent and the FBI for comment.

    Fox News’ David Spunt contributed to this report.

  • 投票过程中,照片身份证获广泛支持,共和党人更可能认为存在选举舞弊——哥伦比亚广播公司新闻民调显示


    2026年3月19日 / 美国东部时间下午6:32 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    作者:詹妮弗·德平托(Jennifer De Pinto)、弗雷德·巴库斯(Fred Backus)

    要求投票时出示照片身份证以及登记时证明公民身份,均获得广泛且常常是两党一致的支持。

    但这并不意味着所有人都认为当前投票系统存在问题。

    通常是共和党人在推动那些认为存在广泛舞弊的人群比例——而且常常认为舞弊具体发生在城市和民主党主导的地区——但即便如此,也并非共和党人的绝大多数都持此观点。

    在其他群体中,包括许多民主党人,存在对公民身份证明要求会阻止合格公民投票的担忧。

    此外,在选举管理方面仍存在地方优先的观点:大多数美国人认为应该由自己所在的州而非联邦政府对选举如何进行拥有最终决定权。

    大多数美国人也表示邮寄投票是可以接受的,而采用邮寄方式投票的人尤其倾向于持此看法。

    总体而言,很少有美国人觉得自己对《SAVE法案》的具体内容了解很多。

    照片身份证和公民身份证明

    投票时出示照片身份证的想法在两党中都获得支持。

    登记时证明公民身份也得到多数人支持,尽管支持比例相对投票时出示照片身份证略低。

    具体而言,在许多人看来,投票身份识别要求需要不仅仅是学生证之类的证件或仅仅是签名。

    如果要求提供证明会怎样?

    需要证明公民身份的感知影响存在明显的党派差异:民主党人更倾向于认为这会阻止美国公民投票,而更多共和党人则认为这会阻止非公民投票。

    大局:美国人对投票过程的看法

    党派立场决定了人们认为问题出在哪里(如果存在问题的话)。

    认为选举系统中存在广泛舞弊的观点在共和党普通党员中更为普遍,比其他群体更甚。

    但即便如此,这也并非压倒性多数,仅略超过一半的共和党人持此看法。

    这并非新现象:自2020年选举以来的数年中,大多数共和党人一贯认为前总统乔·拜登的当选不合法。

    更具体地说,共和党人认为,当存在舞弊时,舞弊往往来自城市地区,而非郊区或农村地区,且来自民主党州而非共和党州。

    邮寄投票——在许多州,这是主要甚至是唯一的投票方式——引发了褒贬不一的看法。大多数共和党人认为它只应该提供给那些无法亲自投票的人。

    共和党人也往往觉得邮寄投票带来更多舞弊。

    但对邮寄投票的看法也会根据人们自己的投票方式而变化。

    大多数在2024年报告采用邮寄方式投票的人认为应该向所有选民开放邮寄投票,这其中包括约一半报告为特朗普投票的邮寄选民。

    共和党人更有可能相信非公民在联邦选举中非法投票的情况经常发生,但即便如此,也并非所有共和党人都持此看法。

    更广泛地说,大多数共和党人认为一个主要问题是有人投了不符合资格的票。

    民主党人看到的问题则相反——即合格选民被阻止投票是一个主要问题。

    但对所有这些问题的看法不一定与《SAVE法案》相关。许多支持身份证和公民身份证明要求的人对《SAVE法案》并不确定,称他们不了解其中的具体内容。

    选举是联邦事务吗?

    大多数人认为应该由自己的州而非联邦政府对选举如何管理拥有最终决定权。

    在监督方面,这可能更多取决于谁掌权而非抽象的治理观念。如今,大多数共和党人希望对本州的选举进行更多联邦监督,而大多数民主党人则不希望。在2021年拜登政府时期,情况则相反:民主党人希望更多联邦监督,而共和党人则不希望。

    总体而言,无论党派如何,美国人往往至少对自己的地方和州选举管理表达一定程度的信心(即便不是很多)。

    他们往往认为自己的选票会被正确计票。

    即便他们看到广泛的舞弊——主要发生在城市和民主党主导的地区——大多数共和党人仍然确信自己的投票会被正确计票和记录。

    *

    本次哥伦比亚广播公司新闻/优矩智库(YouGov)民调基于对2500名美国成年人的全国代表性样本进行,调查时间为2026年3月16日至19日。样本根据性别、年龄、种族和教育程度,参照美国人口普查局的美国社区调查、当前人口调查以及2024年总统选举结果进行加权,以确保能代表全国成年人。误差边际为±2.2个百分点。

    核心要点

    哥伦比亚广播公司新闻关于投票过程的民调

    分类:

    • 投票
    • 民意调查

    In voting process, photo ID gets wide support, Republicans more likely to believe there’s fraud, CBS News poll finds

    March 19, 2026 / 6:32 PM EDT / CBS News

    By

    Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus

    Requiring photo ID to vote and proving citizenship to register both find wide and often bipartisan support.

    But that doesn’t mean everyone sees problems with the current voting system.

    It is often Republicans driving the percentages of those who think there is widespread fraud — and often think it’s specifically in cities and Democratic areas — but even then, it’s not an overwhelming majority of them.

    Elsewhere, including among many Democrats, there’s concern that proof of citizenship requirements will prevent eligible citizens from voting.

    And there’s still a local-first perspective on running elections: Most Americans would have their own states, rather than the federal government, have the final say in how elections are run.

    Most Americans also say voting by mail is ok. And people who vote that way are especially inclined to say so.

    In all, few Americans feel they know a lot of specifics about what’s in the SAVE Act.

    Photo ID and proof of citizenship

    The idea of showing photo ID to vote gets support across party lines.

    Proving citizenship to register also gets majority backing, if relatively less than a photo ID to vote.

    Specifically, in the minds of many, identification requirements to vote would need to be more than things like student IDs or just a signature.

    What happens if proof is required?

    The perceived implications of needing to prove citizenship are sharply partisan, though: Democrats are more inclined to say it’ll prevent US citizens from being able to vote, while more Republicans say that it will block non-citizens from doing so.

    The big picture: How Americans feel about the voting process

    Partisanship steers where people think the problems are, if any.

    The notion that there is widespread fraud in the system is far more prevalent among the Republican rank and file, more so than others.

    But that said, it’s not an overwhelming majority, at just over half of Republicans.

    And this is not a new development: in the years since the 2020 election, most Republicans routinely felt former President Joe Biden had not been legitimately elected.

    More specifically, Republicans think that when there is fraud, it tends to come from urban areas, more so than suburban or rural places and from Democratic states, not Republican ones.

    Mail voting — which, in many states, is a substantial or even entirely the way they vote — draws mixed views. Most Republicans feel it should only be available to those unable to physically vote.

    Republicans also tend to feel mail balloting brings more fraud.

    But views on mail voting also change depending on the manner in which people cast their own ballots.

    Most of those who report voting by mail in 2024 say it should be available to all voters, and this includes about half of the mail-in voters who report having voted for President Trump.

    Republicans are far more likely to believe it happens a lot that non-citizens illegally vote in federal elections. But even then, it’s not all Republicans who think so.

    More broadly, most Republicans say a major problem is people casting votes who are ineligible to do so.

    Democrats see something of the opposite issue — that eligible people being prevented from voting is a major problem.

    But views on all this don’t necessarily connect to the SAVE Act. Many who favor ID and proof of citizenship requirements aren’t sure about the SAVE Act, and say they don’t know the specifics of what’s in it.

    Are elections a federal matter?

    Most feel it is their state — not the federal government — that ought to have a final say in how elections are administered.

    In terms of oversight, it may have more to do with who is in power than with abstract views of governance. Today, most Republicans want more federal oversight over their states’ elections, while most Democrats do not. Back in 2021, during the Biden administration, it was the reverse: Democrats wanted more federal oversight, while Republicans did not.

    In all, across party lines, Americans already tend to voice at least some confidence (if not a lot) in their local and state elections administration.

    They tend to think their own votes will be counted correctly.

    Even as they see widespread fraud – primarily in cities and Democratic places – most Republicans are confident that their OWN vote will be counted and recorded correctly.

    *

    This CBS News/YouGov survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 2,500 U.S. adults interviewed between March 16-19, 2026. The sample was weighted to be representative of adults nationwide according to gender, age, race, and education, based on the U.S. Census American Community Survey and Current Population Survey, as well as 2024 presidential vote. The margin of error is ±2.2 points.

    Toplines

    CBS News poll on voting process

    In:

    • Voting
    • Opinion Poll
湘ICP备2026001899号-2