作者: root

  • 两党议员呼吁特朗普政府不要将阿富汗盟友遣送至不安全国家


    2026-06-11 17:35:06 UTC / 路透社

    作者:帕特里夏·曾格勒

    2026年6月11日 美国东部时间下午5:35 更新于两小时前

    image
    华盛顿,6月11日(路透社)——数十名美国国会议员于周四敦促唐纳德·特朗普政府,取消任何将在本国战争期间为美军效力的阿富汗公民遣送至不安全第三国的计划。

    路透社获得的一封信件显示,包括至少三名共和党议员在内的80多名众议院议员,联名呼吁国务卿马可·卢比奥重新考虑针对1100名被困在卡塔尔等待安置的阿富汗人的安置计划。

    获取路透社美国政治通讯,每周了解美国政治及对全球的影响。点击此处订阅。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    “我们国家信守承诺,保护那些为了保障我们的安全而置身险境的人,这既是道义责任,也是国家安全的必要之举,”牵头撰写这封信的民主党众议员、前陆军游骑兵科罗拉多州的杰森·克劳在一份声明中说道。

    今年早些时候,特朗普政府曾就将这些阿富汗人送往刚果民主共和国进行谈判,而此时距离美国从喀布尔撤军已经过去四年多,这些人仍处于滞留状态。

    2025年底以来,阿富汗人的处境变得更加艰难,此前一名阿富汗移民被控在华盛顿发动袭击,造成一名国民警卫队成员死亡,另一名受伤。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    枪击事件发生后,特朗普政府将矛头指向前总统、民主党人乔·拜登任期内对阿富汗人和其他外国国民的审查漏洞,尽管嫌疑人拉赫曼拉乌拉·拉坎瓦尔是在特朗普任期内获得庇护的。

    特朗普签署了一项行政命令,禁止包括曾为美军工作过的人员在内的阿富汗难民进入美国。

    国会中许多特朗普的共和党同僚已经不再支持曾经两党共同支持的特殊移民签证计划,该计划旨在帮助曾为美军效力的阿富汗人前往美国。

    上周,卢比奥在国会听证会上被问及,尽管这个饱受战乱的非洲国家爆发了埃博拉疫情,本届政府是否仍计划将这些阿富汗人送往刚果(金)。卢比奥回应称,美国正在与“多个国家”进行谈判。

    Democrats, Republicans ask Trump administration not to ship Afghan allies to unsafe countries

    2026-06-11 17:35:06 UTC / Reuters

    By Patricia Zengerle

    June 11, 2026 5:35 PM UTC Updated 2 hours ago

    Special Immigrants from Afghanistan walk through the in-processing building after their evacuation at Camp As Sayliyah, Qatar, August 20, 2021. U.S. Army/Sgt. Jimmie Baker/Handout via REUTERS

    WASHINGTON, June 11 (Reuters) – Dozens of U.S. lawmakers urged President Donald ​Trump’s administration on Thursday to roll back any plans to ship to unsafe third countries Afghan nationals who worked ‌with U.S. forces during the war in their homeland.

    In a letter seen by Reuters, more than 80 House of Representatives members, including at least three Republicans as well as Democrats, appealed to Secretary of State Marco Rubio to reconsider plans for 1,100 Afghans who have been stranded in Qatar ​awaiting relocation.

    Get weekly news and analysis on U.S. politics and how it matters to the world with the Reuters Politics U.S. newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    “It’s both a moral and a national security imperative that our country live up to its promise and ​watch out for those who put themselves in harm’s way to help keep us safe,” Democratic ⁠Representative Jason Crow of Colorado, a former Army Ranger who led the letter, said in a statement.

    Earlier this year, the Trump ​administration was in talks to send the Afghans to the Democratic Republic of Congo, as they remained in limbo more than four ​years after the U.S. withdrawal from Kabul.

    The situation for Afghans in particular has been more difficult since late 2025, after an Afghan immigrant was accused of an attack in Washington that killed one National Guard member and wounded another.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    After the shooting, Trump’s administration pointed to a lack of vetting ​of Afghans and other foreign nationals during the term of former President Joe Biden, a Democrat, although the suspect Rahmanullah ​Lakanwal was granted asylum under Trump.

    Trump signed an executive order preventing Afghan refugees, including those who worked with the military, from entering the U.S.

    Many ‌of ⁠Trump’s fellow Republicans in Congress have stepped back from what was once bipartisan support for efforts like the Special Immigrant Visa program to clear Afghans who had worked with American forces to come to the United States.

    Rubio was queried at congressional hearings last week about whether the administration still planned to send the Afghans to the DRC, despite an Ebola outbreak in the war-torn African ​nation. Rubio responded that the U.S. ​was talking with “multiple countries

  • 事实与特朗普的加州阴谋论不符,于是他调整了这套阴谋论


    2026-06-11T16:18:50.830Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/11/politics/fact-check-trump-california-conspiracy-steve-hilton

    • 唐纳德·特朗普总统声称,是他的公开施压迫使加州官员批准共和党州长候选人史蒂夫·希尔顿获得11月决选资格,而非按原计划操纵初选结果。
    • 加州各郡只是照常计票,希尔顿因获得足够票数而晋级。
    • 希尔顿并未认可特朗普关于加州初选存在舞弊的说法。

    AI生成的摘要已由CNN编辑审核。

    如果你坚信上周加州初选结果遭到操纵,试图阻止像州长候选人史蒂夫·希尔顿这样的共和党人胜出,那么希尔顿成功获得11月决选资格的事实,显然会让你的说法陷入极为尴尬的境地。

    但如果你是像唐纳德·特朗普总统这样经验老道的阴谋论者,你不会在新事实与你的荒诞说法相悖时就停止传播。相反,你只会调整这套阴谋论,让新事实也能被纳入其中。

    特朗普在这类不诚实的叙事变通方面已有多年经验。比如2011年前总统巴拉克·奥巴马公布其夏威夷出生证明长版文件,彻底推翻了特朗普所谓“奥巴马并非在美国出生”的阴谋论后,特朗普并未立刻放弃这套荒谬言论,而是很快改口称那份出生证明是伪造的。

    这一次,特朗普并未承认显然该放弃他关于加州选举被操纵的说法,反而开始宣称他已经迫使操纵选举者屈服——但这只适用于希尔顿的情况,不适用于共和党洛杉矶市长候选人落选的斯宾塞·普拉特。

    请试着跟上他的逻辑。

    希尔顿并未认可特朗普的舞弊说法,他曾表示自己“未看到任何理由”需要采取法律行动。但特朗普周三在白宫对记者称,包括CNN在内的多家媒体预测希尔顿将获得决选资格,这是因为特朗普曾公开警告称民主党正打算操纵结果,阻止希尔顿晋级。特朗普称,正是因为他施加的“压力”,不知名的民主党人才被迫放弃了他们计划用来操纵希尔顿的手段,就像特朗普所说的那样,他们曾用同样手段操纵了普拉特的选举结果。

    特朗普的说法是:“然后我在那件事(普拉特的败选)上对他们施压很重,但我开始谈论史蒂夫·希尔顿,他是个很棒的人。我看到他们说要等两周才能出结果,于是我开始施压。‘这也会发生在史蒂夫·希尔顿身上。’就是——‘听着,你们得留意’——然后他们很快就批准了史蒂夫·希尔顿。他们不想,当时舆论压力太大了。他能获得批准的唯一原因——他本来就拿到了足够的票数,甚至可能是第一名——但他们批准史蒂夫·希尔顿的唯一原因是,他们原本说要等两周,结果当天晚上就批准了他。因为当时舆论压力拉满了,他们就是些骗子。”

    周四上午,他在福克斯新闻频道再次重复了这套说法,称原本“注定会发生在史蒂夫·希尔顿身上的”操纵式败选,最终“因为我持续施压,他们立刻就批准了;他们批准了史蒂夫。这就是一场彻头彻尾的操纵,太离谱了。他们这么快就批准他,就是因为所有人都在盯着这件事”。

    当然,这完全是一派胡言。

    就目前所有可获取的证据而言,加州发生的一切都只是各郡照常计票——和往常一样进度缓慢,但流程合法。在洛杉矶市长初选中,计票结果显示普拉特无法进入晋级决选所需的前两名。在州长职位的州初选中,计票结果则显示希尔顿将进入前两名。

    没有任何加州官员“批准”了希尔顿的资格,无论是因为特朗普还是其他任何人;不存在幕后决策来满足希尔顿的诉求。真实情况平淡无奇:加州选民参与了投票;各郡进行了计票;媒体最终非官方预测,希尔顿将获得足够票数晋级——该州登记选民中约45%为民主党人,约25%为共和党人;与此同时,媒体非官方预测普拉特无法获得足够票数晋级——在洛杉矶市,民主党选民占比远高于共和党,约为55%比15%。

    事情本该就此结束。但和往常一样,在特朗普这里,事情永远不会结束。

    五年多来,大量证据都未能让特朗普放弃关于他输掉的2020年总统大选的阴谋论谎言。如今一份强有力的矛盾证据,自然也不足以让他放弃这套新的荒唐言论。

    The facts didn’t fit Trump’s California conspiracy theory. So he adjusted the conspiracy theory

    2026-06-11T16:18:50.830Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/11/politics/fact-check-trump-california-conspiracy-steve-hilton

    • President Donald Trump claimed his public pressure forced California officials to approve Republican gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton’s qualification for the November runoffs rather than proceed with a plan to rig the results of the primary.
    • California counties were simply counting votes as usual, and Hilton advanced because he earned enough votes.
    • Hilton hasn’t endorsed Trump’s claims about fraud in the California primaries.

    AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.

    If you’re pushing the baseless conspiracy theory that the results of last week’s California primary elections were rigged against Republicans like gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton, it would seem highly inconvenient that Hilton has succeeded in qualifying for the November runoffs.

    But if you’re a seasoned conspiracy theorist, as President Donald Trump is, you don’t just stop telling a fantastical tale when it is contradicted by new facts. Rather, you simply adjust the conspiracy theory so that the new facts now fit within it.

    Trump has years of experience with this kind of dishonest narrative flexibility. It’s what he employed, for example, after former President Barack Obama released his long-form Hawaii birth certificate in 2011, conclusively disproving Trump’s conspiracy theory that Obama wasn’t actually born in the US. Rather than immediately abandon his nonsense, Trump soon began suggesting the birth certificate was a phony.

    This time, rather than conceding that it’s obviously time to abandon his “rigged election” declarations about California, Trump has begun claiming that he had jawboned the riggers into submission … but only in Hilton’s case, not the case of unsuccessful Republican Los Angeles mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt.

    Try to follow along here.

    Hilton hasn’t endorsed Trump’s fraud claims; he has said he has “seen nothing” to justify any legal intervention. But Trump told reporters at the White House on Wednesday that Hilton’s qualification for the runoff, as projected by CNN and others, happened because Trump had publicly warned that Democrats were about to rig the results to prevent Hilton from qualifying for the runoff. It was because of this Trump “heat,” Trump said, that unnamed Democrats felt compelled to surrender their plan to cheat Hilton like they, according to Trump, cheated Pratt.

    Trump’s story: “And then I hit them hard on that (Pratt’s defeat), but I started talking about Steve Hilton, who’s a fantastic guy. And I saw them say it was going to be two weeks before they knew, and I started hitting them. ‘It’s going to happen to Steve Hilton, too.’ It’s – ‘Watch, you gotta watch’ – and they approved Steve Hilton very quickly. They didn’t want, there was too much heat on them. The only reason he got approved – he had all the votes he needed, probably to be first place – but the only reason they approved Steve Hilton, it was going to be two weeks, they said, and then they approved him that night. Because the heat was on them, because they’re cheatin’ dogs.”

    He repeated the story Thursday morning on Fox News, saying that a rigged defeat “was happening to Steve Hilton” but then “I went on such a tear that they approved it immediately; they approved Steve. It’s such a rigged deal, it’s so crazy. They were, they approved him so fast because everybody was watching.”

    This is, of course, complete hogwash.

    All that has happened in California, as far as all available evidence shows, is that counties are counting votes – slowly, as usual, but legitimately. In the case of the Los Angeles mayoral primary, counting votes has meant that it has become clear that Pratt will not achieve the top-two finish needed to qualify for the runoff. In the case of the state primary for governor, counting votes has meant that it has become clear that Hilton will achieve a top-two finish.

    No California authority “approved him,” whether because of Trump or because of anybody else; there was no behind-the-scenes decision to grant Hilton his wish. The reality is boring: California voters voted; counties counted; media outlets eventually projected, unofficially, that Hilton would earn enough votes to advance in a state in which about 45% of registered voters were Democratic and about 25% were Republican; separately, media outlets unofficially projected that Pratt wouldn’t earn enough votes to advance in a city in which Democrats outnumbered Republicans much more significantly, about 55% to 15%.

    The end. Except, as usual with Trump, not the end.

    A mountainous supply of evidence, over the course of more than five years, has never been sufficient to get Trump to drop his conspiratorial lying about the 2020 presidential election he lost. It’s no surprise that one very strong piece of contradicting evidence hasn’t been sufficient to get him to dump this new round of foolishness.

  • 特朗普提名前SEC主席、现任联邦检察官杰伊·克莱顿担任国家情报总监


    2026年6月11日 美国东部时间下午2:26 / 福克斯新闻网

    克莱顿目前担任纽约南区联邦检察官,此前曾任职于苏利文·克伦威尔律师事务所

    作者:艾玛·巴西,福克斯新闻网

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章播报!

    唐纳德·特朗普总统周四宣布,前美国证券交易委员会主席、现任联邦检察官杰伊·克莱顿将出任下一任常设国家情报总监。

    此次提名是在代理局长威廉·普尔泰短暂履职后作出的,普尔泰是在图尔西·加巴德辞职后接任该职位的。

    特朗普在Truth Social的帖子中表示:“我很高兴宣布提名备受尊敬的杰伊·克莱顿——前美国证券交易委员会主席、全球最知名且最成功的律所之一苏利文·克伦威尔前负责人、现任纽约南区联邦检察官——担任下一任国家情报总监,并且重要的是,他将加入我的内阁。”

    他补充道:“全球法律界中,能像杰伊这样受人尊敬的人寥寥无几。”

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    特朗普说:“我敦促美国参议院尽快确认杰伊的任命。”

    这是一则突发新闻。请返回查看最新进展。

    艾玛·巴西是福克斯新闻数字频道的突发新闻撰稿人。加入福克斯新闻之前,她曾在《每日电讯报》美国夜班团队工作,负责过国际、政治、新闻、体育和文化等多个版面。

    Trump nominates Jay Clayton, former SEC chairman, current US Attorney, as intelligence director

    June 11, 2026 2:26pm EDT / Fox News

    Clayton currently serves as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and previously led Sullivan & Cromwell

    By Emma Bussey, Fox News

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    President Donald Trump announced Thursday that former SEC Chairman and current U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton will be the next permanent director of national intelligence.

    The nomination followed a brief stint by acting Director William Pulte, who took over after Tulsi Gabbard stepped down.

    “I am pleased to announce the Nomination of very Highly Respected Jay Clayton, former Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the former Head of Sullivan & Cromwell, one of the most prominent and successful Law Firms anywhere in the World, and the current United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, to be the next Director of National Intelligence and, importantly, to serve in my Cabinet,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

    “Few people anywhere in the Legal Community are respected at the level of Jay,” he added.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    “I encourage the United States Senate to confirm Jay as soon as possible,” Trump said.

    This is a breaking story. Return for updates.

    Emma Bussey is a breaking news writer for Fox News Digital. Before joining Fox, she worked at The Telegraph with the U.S. overnight team, across desks including foreign, politics, news, sport and culture.

  • 美国正监控南海某争议沙洲附近的中国动向


    2026年6月11日 美国东部时间下午1:49 / 哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS News)

    作者:奥利维亚·加齐斯
    奥利维亚·加齐斯负责为哥伦比亚广播公司报道情报与国际安全事务。她曾两次获得艾美奖提名,曾陪同美国国务卿出访全球各地,并为哥伦比亚广播公司的电视、广播、网络和流媒体平台提供关于情报、外交政策及其他安全议题的报道。

    查看完整简历

    华盛顿讯 —— 美国情报机构正密切监控南海一处争议沙洲的动向,因越来越多担忧认为,中国可能正在为在该地区最敏感的海上热点之一建立更永久存在铺平道路,此举可能进一步激化与菲律宾的紧张关系,并考验华盛顿对条约盟友的承诺。

    据熟悉相关情报的美国官员透露,分析人员正在仔细审查中国近期在斯卡伯勒浅滩附近开展的一系列海上行动。这片无人居住但战略位置重要的环礁距菲律宾吕宋岛以西约140英里。这些官员因需讨论国家安全问题,要求匿名接受哥伦比亚广播公司采访。官员们表示,中国政府在该环礁中部部署了北京方面所称的“科研设施”,此举激怒了对这片争议环礁提出主权要求的菲律宾。

    美国已就该设施向中国政府提出交涉。据官员透露,中国共产党的军事力量——中国人民解放军声称该设施不具备军事用途,但中国官员也未完全否认该设施内某些部分可被解放军使用。

    美国国家情报总监办公室未回应置评请求。

    斯卡伯勒浅滩在菲律宾被称为巴霍德马辛洛克,在中国被称为黄岩岛,位于菲律宾专属经济区范围内的南海海域,但北京方面在2012年的紧张对峙中实际控制该区域后,一直在此保持近乎不间断的存在。

    一些美国官员担忧,近期的行动可能是中国长期努力巩固对南海争议海域控制权的又一个渐进步骤——菲律宾官员也持有这一观点。

    菲律宾当局本周早些时候披露了斯卡伯勒浅滩内出现浮动设施的情况。菲律宾政府西菲律宾海国家特别工作组周二发布的一份声明称,空中监视发现了一个6米×6米的浮动平台,上面似乎装有天线。近期的影像还显示有人员站在该平台上,菲律宾海岸警卫队的监测显示该平台一直在浅滩内运作。

    “外交部已就该浮动设施的非法存在与中华人民共和国政府采取了适当的外交行动,”该工作组表示,并补充称菲律宾相关机构正在评估该设施的“性质、用途及影响”。

    中国驳斥了菲律宾的抗议,称该平台位于其控制的区域,而非菲律宾的控制区域。

    中国驻美使馆发言人刘鹏宇在接受哥伦比亚广播公司采访时表示:“黄岩岛始终是中国的领土。中国对黄岩岛及其邻近海域拥有无可争辩的主权。在中国黄岩岛开展包括科研在内的活动,完全是中国的主权权利。”

    “中方敦促菲律宾停止在海上的一切侵权、挑衅和虚假指控,”刘鹏宇续称,“中方敦促美方停止挑拨离间、制造对抗。”

    这一动向引起了美国情报分析师和军事规划者的关注,因为中国历史上曾逐步实际控制有争议的海上设施,随后再扩大存在规模。在过去十年间,北京方面将南沙群岛的多处礁盘和岩礁改造为配备机场、深水港、雷达系统和导弹阵地的加固型人工岛。

    “过去20年来,我们见证了自二战以来中国人民解放军最大规模的军事集结,”退役海军上将约翰·阿奎利诺2022年在接受美联社采访时表示,当时他担任美国印度洋-太平洋司令部司令。“他们提升了所有作战能力,这种武器化集结对该地区构成破坏稳定的影响。”

    对中国在该地区活动的担忧一直是美国军事规划的 recurring 议题。去年,哥伦比亚广播公司曾报道,美国军方已制定计划,针对近期中国在斯卡伯勒浅滩附近的挑衅行动开展“武力展示”,旨在向华盛顿表明其意在遏制北京的扩张存在,并捍卫菲律宾的主权和长期捕鱼权。

    去年,北京宣布计划在该区域设立“国家自然保护区”,此举遭到美国国务卿马可·卢比奥的谴责,马尼拉官员也将其视为中国巩固控制权的又一步骤。

    “北京将斯卡伯勒礁列为自然保护区,是又一次胁迫行径,旨在以包括阻止菲律宾渔民进入传统渔场在内的方式,损害邻国利益,推进其在南海广泛的领土和海洋主张,”卢比奥在一份声明中表示,“中国在斯卡伯勒礁的行动继续破坏地区稳定。”

    U.S. monitoring Chinese activity in South China Sea around disputed shoal

    2026-06-11 1:49 PM EDT / CBS News

    By

    Olivia Gazis
    Olivia Gazis covers intelligence and international security matters for CBS News. Twice Emmy-nominated, she has traveled worldwide with the secretary of state and contributes reporting on intelligence, foreign policy and other security topics across CBS News broadcast, radio, online and streaming platforms.

    Read Full Bio

    Washington — U.S. intelligence agencies are closely monitoring activity at a disputed shoal in the South China Sea amid growing concerns that China may be laying the groundwork for a more permanent presence at one of the region’s most volatile maritime flash points, a move that could further inflame tensions with the Philippines and test Washington’s commitment to a treaty ally.

    Analysts are scrutinizing a series of recent Chinese maritime operations near Scarborough Shoal, an uninhabited but strategically located atoll roughly 140 miles west of the Philippine island of Luzon, according to U.S. officials familiar with the intelligence who spoke to CBS News under condition of anonymity to discuss national security issues. The officials said the Chinese government installed what Beijing has called a “scientific structure” in the middle of the reef, which has angered the Philippines in the disputed atoll.

    The U.S. engaged the Chinese government over the structure. The People’s Liberation Army, the military wing of the Chinese Communist Party, claimed the structure was not military, but Chinese officials also did not fully disavow that some element within the structure could be used by the PLA, according to the officials.

    The Office of the Director of National Intelligence has not responded to a request for comment.

    The Scarborough Shoal, known in the Philippines as Bajo de Masinloc and in China as Huangyan Dao, sits within Manila’s exclusive economic zone in the South China Sea, but Beijing has maintained a near-constant presence around the shoal after seizing de facto control in a tense 2012 standoff.

    Some U.S. officials worry that recent activity could represent another incremental step in China’s long-running effort to consolidate control over disputed features across the South China Sea — a view shared by Philippine officials.

    Philippine authorities disclosed the presence of a floating structure inside Scarborough Shoal earlier this week. In a statement released Tuesday, the Philippine government’s National Task Force for the West Philippine Sea said aerial surveillance had identified a 6-by-6-meter floating platform equipped with what appeared to be an antenna. Recent imagery also shows personnel standing atop the structure, while monitoring by the Philippine Coast Guard indicated the platform was operating inside the shoal.

    “The Department of Foreign Affairs has already undertaken appropriate diplomatic action with the government of the People’s Republic of China in connection with the illegal presence of this floating structure,” the task force said, adding that Philippine agencies were assessing the “nature, purpose, and implications” of the installation.

    China rejected Philippine objections, maintaining that the platform is located in an area under its control, not the Philippines’.

    “Huangyan Dao has always been China’s territory. China has indisputable sovereignty over it and its adjacent waters,” Liu Pengyu, an embassy spokesperson for China, told CBS News. “It is fully within China’s sovereign rights to carry out activities including scientific research at Huangyan Dao.”

    “China urges the Philippines to stop all infringement activities, provocations and false accusations at sea,” Liu continued. “China urges the U.S. to stop sowing discord and stoking confrontation.”

    The development has drawn the attention of U.S. intelligence analysts and military planners because of China’s history of gradually establishing physical control over disputed maritime features before expanding its presence. Over the past decade, Beijing transformed several reefs and outcroppings in the Spratly Islands into fortified artificial islands equipped with airfields, deep-water ports, radar systems and missile sites.

    “Over the past 20 years we’ve witnessed the largest military buildup since World War II by the PRC,” said retired Navy Adm. John Aquilino in 2022 during an interview with the Associated Press and the U.S. Indo-Pacific commander. “They have advanced all their capabilities and that buildup of weaponization is destabilizing to the region.”

    Concerns about Chinese activity in the area have been a recurring feature of U.S. military planning. Last year, CBS News reported that the U.S. military had drawn up plans to stage a “show of force” against recent Chinese aggression near the Scarborough Shoal that was intended to signal Washington’s intent to push back against Beijing’s expanding presence and defend Philippine sovereignty and long-standing fishing rights.

    Last year, Beijing announced a plan to create a “national nature reserve” in the area that drew condemnation from Secretary of State Marco Rubio and was viewed by officials in Manila as another step toward solidifying Chinese control.

    “Beijing claiming Scarborough Reef as a nature preserve is yet another coercive attempt to advance sweeping territorial and maritime claims in the South China Sea at the expense of its neighbors, including by preventing Filipino fishermen from accessing these traditional fishing grounds,” Rubio said in a statement. “China’s actions at Scarborough Reef continue to undermine regional stability.”

  • 特朗普称将提名杰伊·克莱顿出任国家情报总监


    2026年6月11日 美国东部时间下午3:27 / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    作者:玛格丽特·吉文 美国有线电视新闻网报道

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/11/politics/video/trump-will-nominate-jay-clayton-dni

    美国有线电视新闻网的鲍里斯·桑切斯和阿莱娜·特里尼就特朗普总统周四宣布提名南纽约地区联邦检察官杰伊·克莱顿出任下一任国家情报总监一事进行了报道。

    4:23 • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    当日政治要闻 11个视频

    特朗普称将提名杰伊·克莱顿出任最高情报职位
    04:23
    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    五角大楼封锁与疏散系虚惊,两名消息人士透露
    01:11
    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    首次一睹白宫草坪上的UFC“八角笼”
    00:37
    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    伊朗高级官员告诉CNN:除非美国尊重伊朗利益,否则战争将持续
    00:44
    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    马里兰州州长韦斯·摩尔回应有关其兵役经历的质疑
    05:57
    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    听听共和党众议员马克斯·米勒前妻描述虐待指控的警方录音,米勒否认相关指控
    05:05
    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    随着特朗普新一波攻击邮寄投票与选举欺诈调查,2026年中期选举担忧加剧
    05:33
    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    一名民主党人分享从比尔·盖茨在爱泼斯坦调查案作证中得到的启示
    00:46
    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    美国称针对伊朗击落美军直升机一事发起新一轮空袭
    01:38
    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    特朗普家族推出纪念白宫UFC赛事的纪念币,售价最高达11999.99美元
    03:21
    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    特朗普声称伊朗协议可在数日内签署
    00:37
    正在播放
    • 消息来源:美国有线电视新闻网

    Trump says he will nominate Jay Clayton to top intelligence post

    2026-06-11 3:27 PM EDT / CNN

    By Margaret Given, CNN

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/11/politics/video/trump-will-nominate-jay-clayton-dni

    CNN’s Boris Sanchez and Alayna Treene on President Trump’s announcement Thursday that he’s nominating Jay Clayton, the US attorney for the Southern District of New York, to be his next director of national intelligence.

    4:23 • Source: CNN

    Politics of the Day 11 videos

    Trump says he will nominate Jay Clayton to top intelligence post

    04:23

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Pentagon lockdown and evacuation was due to a false alarm, two sources say

    01:11

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Get a first look at UFC ‘octagon’ on White House lawn

    00:37

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    War will continue unless US respects Iran’s interests, senior Iranian official tells CNN

    00:44

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Maryland Gov. Wes Moore addresses questions about his military service

    05:57

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Hear police audio of GOP Rep. Max Miller’s ex-wife describing abuse claims, which he denies

    05:05

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Concerns grow over 2026 midterm elections amid new Trump attacks on mail-in voting, election fraud probes

    05:33

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Democrat shares his takeaways from Bill Gates’ testimony in Epstein probe

    00:46

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    US says it launched new wave of strikes against Iran over downed US helicopter

    01:38

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Trump family promoting coins commemorating White House UFC fight; cost up to $11,999.99

    03:21

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

    Trump claims Iran deal could be signed in days

    00:37

    Now playing
    • Source: CNN

  • 美国最高法院推翻前推特员工在沙特间谍案中的妨碍司法定罪


    2026-06-11 16:33:07 / 路透社

    2019年11月21日,美国加利福尼亚州都柏林,因在候审期间获释而离开圣丽塔监狱的前推特公司雇员艾哈迈德·阿布阿莫(Ahmad Abouammo)。路透社/凯特·芒施 资料图

    路透社6月11日电——美国最高法院周四推翻了一名被控为沙特阿拉伯从事间谍活动的前推特雇员的妨碍司法定罪,称其因明知伪造文件以阻碍联邦调查局调查而受审的州法院管辖有误。

    大法官们一致裁定,美国司法部2022年在旧金山的陪审团面前在加利福尼亚州对艾哈迈德·阿布阿莫定罪的做法是错误的,因为他与联邦调查局特工的唯一互动是在他位于华盛顿州西雅图的家中。

    订阅《每日案卷》新闻简报,将最新法律新闻直接发送至您的收件箱,开启您的清晨时光。点击此处注册。

    自由派大法官埃琳娜·卡根(Elena Kagan)代表法院撰写判决意见称,尽管阻碍调查的伪造文件罪“相对容易举证”,但法律限制了检方就该项指控对被告人提起诉讼的管辖地。

    “伪造文件罪的审判必须在被告人伪造文件的地点进行,”卡根写道,“本案中该地点是西雅图——从管辖地角度来说,也就是华盛顿西区联邦地区法院。”

    此次裁决并未涉及阿布阿莫被判有罪的其他几项刑事指控,包括他充当外国政府未注册代理人以及实施电信欺诈和诚实服务欺诈的罪名。现年47岁的阿布阿莫最初被判处3年半监禁,2025年6月在上诉期间获释出狱。

    阿布阿莫的律师托拜厄斯·洛斯-伊顿(Tobias Loss-Eaton)拒绝置评。负责审理此案的加利福尼亚北区联邦地区法院美国检察官办公室的代表未立即回应置评请求。

    阿布阿莫2013年至2015年在推特工作,当时这家社交媒体平台尚未被亿万富翁埃隆·马斯克收购并更名为X,他当时担任该公司中东和北非地区媒体合作经理。

    据检方指控,阿布阿莫在推特旧金山办事处工作期间,向一名沙特官员提供了两名在推特上发帖的沙特持不同政见者的机密信息,以换取一块价值4.2万美元的手表以及两笔各10万美元的电汇汇款。

    阿布阿莫后来搬到西雅图,创办了一家社交媒体咨询公司。根据法庭记录,当两名驻旧金山的联邦调查局特工飞往西雅图到他家中对他进行约谈时,阿布阿莫否认向该沙特官员提供过机密信息,并称所收款项是他提供咨询服务的报酬。

    检方称,当特工要求他提供能够佐证其说法的文件时,阿布阿莫伪造了一张发票,并通过电子邮件发送给其中一名特工,这也成为了妨碍司法指控的依据。

    内特·雷蒙德 波士顿报道;威尔·邓汉姆 编辑

    我们的报道准则:汤森路透信托原则。

    内特·雷蒙德负责报道联邦司法系统与诉讼相关新闻。您可通过nate.raymond@thomsonreuters.com与他取得联系。

    US Supreme Court overturns ex-Twitter employee’s obstruction conviction in Saudi spy case

    2026-06-11 16:33:07 / Reuters

    Ahmad Abouammo, a former Twitter Inc employee accused of spying for Saudi Arabia, leaves Santa Rita jail after being freed pending trial, in Dublin, California, U.S. November 21, 2019. REUTERS/Kate Munsch/File Photo

    June 11 (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court overturned on ​Thursday an obstruction conviction of a former Twitter employee accused of spying for Saudi Arabia, ‌saying he was tried in the wrong state for knowingly falsifying a document to impede an FBI investigation.

    The justices unanimously ruled that the U.S. Justice Department wrongly in 2022 secured Ahmad Abouammo’s conviction in California from a jury in San Francisco, when his ​only interactions with FBI agents had been at his home in Seattle in Washington state.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    Liberal Justice ​Elena Kagan, writing for the court, said that while the offense of falsifying a ⁠document to impede an investigation “is relatively easy to prove,” the law restricts where the prosecution can take ​someone to trial on that charge.

    “The trial for falsifying a document must take place where the defendant falsified ​the document,” Kagan wrote. “Here that was in Seattle – meaning in venue terms, the Western District of Washington.”

    The ruling did not touch on the other criminal counts for which Abouammo was convicted including charges that he acted as an unregistered agent of ​a foreign government and committed wire and honest services fraud. Abouammo, 47, was released from prison in June ​2025 while the appeal was pending after being initially sentenced to 3-1/2 years in custody.

    Tobias Loss-Eaton, a lawyer for Abouammo, declined ‌to ⁠comment. Representatives for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California, which had tried the case, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    Abouammo worked at Twitter from 2013 to 2015, prior to the social media platform being acquired by billionaire Elon Musk and renamed X, and served as its media partnerships ​manager for the Middle East ​and North Africa region.

    According ⁠to prosecutors, Abouammo while working at Twitter’s San Francisco office provided confidential information to a Saudi official about two Saudi dissidents posting on Twitter in exchange for ​a watch worth $42,000 and two wire transfers of $100,000 each.

    Abouammo later relocated to Seattle ​and started ⁠a social-media consulting company. When two San Francisco-based FBI agents flew to Seattle to interview him at his home, Abouammo denied giving the Saudi official confidential information and said the payments were instead for consulting work he did, ⁠according to ​court records.

    When the agents asked for documents to support his ​story, Abouammo created a fake invoice that he then emailed to one of them, prosecutors said, leading to the obstruction charge.

    Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Will Dunham

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    Nate Raymond reports on the federal judiciary and litigation. He can be reached at nate.raymond@thomsonreuters.com.

  • 特朗普提名检察官杰伊·克莱顿出任下一任国家情报总监


    2026年6月11日 美国东部时间14:14 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    撰稿
    更新于:2026年6月11日 / 美国东部时间下午3:32 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    华盛顿——特朗普总统周四宣布,他提名现任美国纽约南区联邦检察官杰伊·克莱顿出任下一任国家情报总监,旨在打破国会山的僵局,该僵局正阻碍一项关键间谍工具的延期。

    总统在Truth Social平台的一篇帖子中宣布了这一决定,并敦促参议院“尽快”确认克莱顿的提名。

    “全球法律界几乎无人能达到杰伊这样的受尊重程度。我敦促美国参议院尽快确认杰伊的提名,”总统写道。克莱顿曾于2017年至2020年担任美国证券交易委员会主席。

    image
    杰伊·克莱顿,纽约南区联邦检察官,2026年3月9日周一在纽约的一场新闻发布会上聆听发言。赛斯·温尼格 / 美联社

    特朗普先生提名的代理国家情报总监比尔·普尔特遭到国会民主党人和部分共和党人的强烈批评。这场争端导致《外国情报监控法》第702条规定的无证搜查授权延期工作陷入停滞,该授权将于本周末到期。

    民主党人拒绝同意任何延期,只要普尔特即将担任该职位。总统表示,普尔特将于6月19日接替图尔西·加巴德,而他宣布提名克莱顿并未改变这一时间表。

    参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩对这一举措表示赞赏,他告诉记者,克莱顿“以极其能干的管理者身份拥有极佳声誉”。这位南达科他州共和党人表示,他希望这一举措能帮助结束围绕《外国情报监控法》的僵局,并承诺将尽快完成确认程序:“我不知道‘现实可行’的标准是什么,但我们将竭尽所能。”

    但参议院情报委员会民主党最高成员、弗吉尼亚州参议员马克·沃纳向记者表示,他反对在普尔特仍将担任代理国家情报总监的情况下延长该法案,不过他补充说自己对克莱顿“极为敬重”。

    “如果图尔西·加巴德能留任到我们完成他的确认程序,这或许是一条出路,”沃纳说。

    这位弗吉尼亚州民主党人质疑白宫解决僵局的诚意,他指出众议院已经离开华盛顿,目前无法批准任何延期法案。
    “我完全不明白他为什么要等到众议院休会后才行动,”他说。

    参议院少数党领袖、纽约州民主党人查克·舒默也呼应了这一观点,称普尔特“必须下台”。

    周四早些时候,众议院一项短期《外国情报监控法》延期提案未能获得足够支持,民主党人将此归咎于普尔特的提名。参议院共和党人也曾尝试通过一致同意程序通过短期延期法案,但长期以来一直寻求改革第702条的俄勒冈州民主党参议员罗恩·怀登提出了反对。

    总统此前曾表示,他正在面试五名候选人以担任长期国家情报总监一职。该职位负责监督美国18个情报机构。

    克莱顿于2025年8月获确认出任曼哈顿联邦检察官。该办公室被认为是美国最负盛名、最受关注的检察官办公室之一,以起诉涉及公共腐败、内幕交易和其他金融犯罪的白领案件而闻名。

    该办公室目前正在调查多起与伊朗相关的政府行动前后石油和预测市场异常交易有关的案件。该办公室还牵头对委内瑞拉前领导人尼古拉斯·马杜罗提起诉讼。

    克莱顿上任时并无刑法相关经验。作为沙利文·克伦威尔律师事务所的律师,他专门从事融资和并购业务。除了短暂担任联邦检察官的经历外,目前尚不清楚他在国家安全事务方面有何经验,而根据法律规定,这是出任国家情报总监的必要条件。

    去年11月,在特朗普先生在Truth Social平台呼吁展开调查后,时任司法部长帕姆·邦迪表示,克莱顿将调查已故性犯罪者杰弗里·爱泼斯坦与知名民主党人的关联。总统的这一指令正值政府面临发布完整爱泼斯坦档案的压力之际。目前尚不清楚该倡议是否有任何实际进展。

    最近,克莱顿还对加州初选漫长的计票过程提出了质疑。
    “在选举诚信方面,我们表现得极为糟糕,”克莱顿本周在接受CNBC采访时表示。“美国民众质疑这一点是完全合理的。”

    特朗普先生表示,普尔特可能会“发现一些关于选举被操纵的真相”。这番言论值得注意,因为加巴德今年早些时候曾出席联邦调查局对佐治亚州富尔顿县一个选举中心的搜查行动。目前尚不清楚克莱顿若获确认,是否会继续开展此类调查。

    Trump nominating prosecutor Jay Clayton to be next director of national intelligence

    2026-06-11 14:14 EDT / CBS News

    By
    Updated on: June 11, 2026 / 3:32 PM EDT / CBS News

    Washington — President Trump on Thursday announced he’s nominating Jay Clayton, the current U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, to be the next director of national intelligence, aiming to end a stalemate on Capitol Hill that is holding up the extension of a key spy tool.

    The president announced the move in a post on Truth Social, and urged the Senate to confirm Clayton “as soon as possible.”

    “Few people anywhere in the Legal Community are respected at the level of Jay. I encourage the United States Senate to confirm Jay as soon as possible,” the president wrote. Clayton served as the head of the Securities and Exchange Commission from 2017 to 2020.

    Jay Clayton, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, listens during a news conference in New York, Monday, March 9, 2026. Seth Wenig / AP

    Mr. Trump’s pick for acting director of national intelligence, Bill Pulte, has attracted strong criticism from Democrats and some Republicans on in Congress. The dispute has stalled work on an extension of a warrantless surveillance authority under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which is set to lapse this weekend.

    Democrats are refusing to agree to an extension as long as Pulte is set to assume the role. The president said Pulte will take over for Tulsi Gabbard on June 19, and his announcement of Clayton’s nomination did not change that timeline.

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune applauded the move, telling reporters that Clayton has “a great reputation of being an incredibly competent manager.” The South Dakota Republican said he’s hopeful that the move will help bring an end to the standoff over FISA and pledged to confirm him as quickly as possible: “I don’t know what ‘realistic’ is, but we’re going to probe the limits of it.”

    But Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, indicated to reporters that he opposes extending FISA with Pulte still set to become acting director of national intelligence, though he noted that he has “great respect” for Clayton.

    “If there was a way that Tulsi Gabbard will stay in her position until we could get him confirmed, that could be a way out,” Warner said.

    The Virginia Democrat questioned the White House’s seriousness about the impasse, noting that the House has already left Washington and would be unable to approve an extension at this hour.

    “Why he waited until after the House broke, I have no idea,” he said.

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, echoed that Pulte “has got to go.”

    An effort to approve a short-term FISA extension failed to secure enough support in the House earlier Thursday, with Democrats citing the Pulte pick. Senate Republicans also attempted to approve short-term extensions by unanimous consent, but Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, who has been seeking reforms to Section 702, objected.

    The president previously said he was interviewing five people to be the long-term DNI. The role is responsible for overseeing the nation’s 18 intelligence agencies.

    Clayton was confirmed as the U.S. attorney for Manhattan in August 2025. The office is considered one of the most prestigious and high-profile in the country, and is known for its prosecution of white-collar cases involving public corruption, insider trading and other financial crimes.

    The office is currently investigating a number of cases involving suspicious trades in the oil and prediction markets timed with various government actions against Iran. It is also the office that is leading the prosecution against Venezuela’s former leader Nicolás Maduro.

    Clayton came into the role without experience in criminal law. As an attorney at the firm Sullivan & Cromwell, he specialized in capital-raising and mergers and acquisitions. Apart from his brief tenure as U.S. attorney, it is unclear what experience he has in national security matters, which is a requirement under the law to serve as DNI.

    In November, then-Attorney General Pam Bondi said Clayton would investigate the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s connections to prominent Democrats, after Mr. Trump called for an investigation on Truth Social. The president’s directive came amid pressure on the administration to release the full Epstein files. It’s unclear what, if anything, from the initiative.

    More recently, Clayton has also questioned the lengthy vote counting process in California’s primaries.

    “On the integrity side, we’re doing an absolutely terrible job,” Clayton told CNBC this week. “And the American people are right to question it.”

    Mr. Trump said Pulte may “find out some things about the rigged elections,” a notable comment after Gabbard attended an FBI search of an election center in Fulton County, Georgia, earlier this year. It’s not clear if Clayton, if confirmed, would continue such probes.

  • 特朗普推动3500亿美元“自由武器库”计划遭共和党质疑


    2026年6月11日 美国东部时间下午2:16 / 福克斯新闻频道

    参议员约翰·肯尼迪称在中期选举前通过任何法案都“让我头疼”,党内团结裂痕显现
    作者:亚历克斯·米勒、亚当·帕克 福克斯新闻

    NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章播报!

    唐纳德·特朗普总统希望国会一举大幅增加军事拨款,并通过搁置已久的选民身份证和公民身份核验法案,但许多共和党人并不看好这项计划。

    特朗普周三呼吁国会共和党人再次绕过民主党反对派,“立即”通过第三份预算和解法案,其中包括3500亿美元国防开支,以及搁置已久的《保护美国选民资格(SAVE)美国法案》。

    “这是对我国军队的历史性投资,甚至比里根总统时期的规模还要大!和解法案3.0是实现我们的勇士所需的整整1.5万亿美元国防预算的唯一途径,以此打造‘自由武器库’,”特朗普在真相社交平台上写道。

    特朗普的《拯救美国法案》尽管遭遇共和党反抗,仍在参议院显现转机

    2026年6月3日,唐纳德·特朗普总统在华盛顿特区白宫椭圆形办公室签署行政令期间。(肖恩·图/法新社/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    总统的这项请求发布数小时前,他刚将共和党人的第二份预算和解法案签署生效,该法案将在他总统任期剩余时间内为移民执法提供700亿美元资金。特朗普的《一项宏伟法案》也是通过预算和解程序通过的。

    但许多共和党人至少对重启预算和解程序的想法态度冷淡,而在11月中期选举临近之际,立法日程所剩无几,这一程序需要共和党内部严格团结一致才能推进。

    共和党内部也尚未完全接受特朗普提出的1.5万亿美元国防开支请求,一些议员对绕过正常拨款程序来增加国防开支表示担忧。

    特朗普呼吁再次尝试推进该计划之际,他与国会共和党人在政策决策上的分歧日益加剧,这使得在国会山通过立法变得更加困难。

    尽管参议院分歧加剧,特朗普仍取得胜利,通过700亿美元移民海关执法与边境巡逻拨款法案

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6398078831112

    一些支持再次通过党派路线推进该程序的共和党人承认,此举不太可能成功。此外,由于民主党反对,国会不太可能在11月中期选举前通过任何其他法案。

    “我认为,从现在到中期选举之间通过任何法案的可能性都非常、非常渺茫,”路易斯安那州共和党参议员约翰·肯尼迪说。“说这话让我头疼,但我认为这是政治现实。”

    参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩(南达科他州共和党人)没有完全关闭再次推进和解法案的大门,但他指出,共和党内部对推进该法案存在疑虑。

    “你必须拿出能够赢得支持的方案,”图恩说。“你已经听到我们一些议员对另一项和解法案表达了看法。”

    本周早些时候,在一场激烈的参议院拨款委员会听证会上,缅因州共和党参议员苏珊·柯林斯和肯塔基州共和党参议员米奇·麦康奈尔一致认为,另一项和解法案不太可能通过,尤其是将数十亿美元额外国防开支作为附加内容的情况下。

    众议院通过700亿美元拨款法案后,特朗普锁定移民执法资金至任期结束

    2026年6月10日,众议院议长迈克·约翰逊(路易斯安那州共和党人)在华盛顿特区国会山接受媒体采访。(蒂尔尼·L·克罗斯/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社)

    参议院拨款委员会主席柯林斯表示:“和解程序并非最佳途径。”
    “要通过和解法案将非常困难,”柯林斯说。

    在特朗普公开背书之前,众议院就已经在讨论第三份和解法案。众议院议长迈克·约翰逊(路易斯安那州共和党人)曾有信心,他所在的议院将在8月休会前通过第三份预算法案。

    但一些共和党议员对该法案的可行性提出了质疑,理由是共和党在众议院仅占微弱多数,而且缺乏能够团结全党一致的统一政策主张。

    “我还没有听到足够多的政策提案,让我相信这项计划能够成功,但我当然持开放态度,”纽约州共和党众议员尼克·兰格沃利周三对福克斯新闻数字频道说。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

    加利福尼亚州众议员凯文·凯利原本是共和党人,后来转为无党派人士,他曾投票反对特朗普提出的700亿美元移民执法法案,他表示自己不太可能支持第三次尝试。

    “我们现在已经养成了一个习惯:一个政党掌权后就推出和解法案,另一个政党掌权后也如法炮制,这种循环并不好,”这位加州议员对福克斯新闻数字频道说。“这正是加剧我们这里功能失调循环的原因之一。”

    亚历克斯·米勒是福克斯新闻数字频道记者,负责报道美国参议院事务。

    Trump’s push for $350 billion ‘arsenal of freedom’ hits GOP skepticism

    June 11, 2026 2:16pm EDT / Fox News

    Sen. John Kennedy says passing anything before midterms ‘gives me heartburn’ as party unity fractures

    By Alex Miller, Adam Pack, Fox News

    NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

    President Donald Trump wants Congress to supercharge military funding and pass stalled voter ID and citizenship verification legislation in one fell swoop, but many Republicans aren’t sold on the plan.

    Trump on Wednesday called on congressional Republicans to steer around Democrats’ opposition again and “immediately” pass a third budget reconciliation package, including $350 billion in defense spending coupled with the stalled Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act.

    “This is a GENERATIONAL Investment in our Military, even bigger than President Reagan’s! Recon 3.0 is the ONLY path to the full $1.5 TRILLION DOLLAR Military Budget our Warriors need in order to build THE ARSENAL OF FREEDOM,” Trump said on Truth Social.

    TRUMP’S SAVE AMERICA ACT SHOWS SIGNS OF LIFE IN THE SENATE DESPITE REPUBLICAN REVOLT

    President Donald Trump during an executive order signing in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on June 3, 2026.(Shawn Thew/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    The president’s request came just hours after he signed Republicans’ second budget reconciliation bill into law that would fund immigration enforcement through the rest of his presidency for $70 billion. Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act was also passed through budget reconciliation.

    But many Republicans are lukewarm at best to the idea of restarting the budget reconciliation process, which would require strict party unity amid a dwindling calendar of legislative days heading into the November midterm elections.

    The GOP has also yet to fully come around to Trump’s $1.5 trillion defense spending request, and some lawmakers have voiced concern about circumventing the normal appropriations process to boost defense spending.

    Trump’s plea for a third bite at the apple comes as he and congressional Republicans are increasingly at odds over policy decisions that have made passing legislation on the Hill all the more difficult.

    TRUMP SCORES VICTORY DESPITE GROWING GOP DIVIDE AFTER SENATE PASSES $70B ICE, BORDER PATROL FUNDING PACKAGE

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6398078831112

    Some Republicans who have pushed for a third attempt at the party-line process have acknowledged that it’s unlikely to work. Further, Congress is unlikely to pass any other bills before the midterm elections in November because of Democratic opposition.

    “I think it’s a very, very long shot that anything passes between now and the midterms,” Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said. “It gives me heartburn to say that, but I think that’s political reality.”

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., didn’t completely close the door on another reconciliation bill, but he noted that there is skepticism among Republicans on moving forward.

    “You’ve got to have something that you can win on,” Thune said. “And you’ve heard some of our folks already express their views on another reconciliation bill.”

    Earlier in the week, during a contentious Senate Appropriations hearing, Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., both agreed that another reconciliation bill was unlikely to happen, particularly as a dumping ground for billions in additional defense spending.

    TRUMP LOCKS IN ICE FUNDING THROUGH END OF PRESIDENCY AFTER HOUSE PASSES $70B PACKAGE

    House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., speaks to members of the media at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on June 10, 2026.(Tierney L. Cross/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

    Collins, who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee, said, “Reconciliation is not the best approach.”

    “It would be very difficult to get the reconciliation bill approved,” Collins said.

    Discussions on a third reconciliation package were underway in the House prior to Trump’s public endorsement. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has voiced confidence that his chamber will clear a third budget bill by the August recess.

    But some GOP lawmakers have questioned its viability amid Republicans’ slim majority and the potential lack of a unifying policy idea to keep the conference together.

    “I haven’t quite heard enough policy proposals that lead me to think it’s going to gel, but I’m certainly open-minded,” Rep. Nick Langworthy, R-N.Y., told Fox News Digital on Wednesday.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Rep. Kevin Kiley, I-Calif., a Republican-turned-independent who voted against Trump’s $70 billion immigration enforcement measure, indicated he isn’t likely to support a third attempt.

    “We have now gotten to this habit of one party takes power, they do reconciliation bills and the other party does it, and this cycle hasn’t been good,” the California lawmaker told Fox News Digital. “It’s one of the things that fed the cycles of dysfunction that we have around here.”

    Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.

  • 特朗普如何在伊朗问题上自欺欺人


    2026-06-11T16:51:41.084Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/11/politics/trump-iran-deceiving-analysis

    • 唐纳德·特朗普总统曾多次表示与伊朗达成协议指日可待,同时却淡化军事威胁,对伊朗的挑衅行为轻描淡写。
    • 他一再放宽最后期限、发出空洞威胁的做法,向德黑兰传递出一个信号:他没有重启敌对行动的意愿。
    • 中期选举临近,特朗普面临越来越大的压力,需要解决这场可能已成为共和党政治负担的冲突。

    本文由AI生成的摘要经CNN编辑审核。

    唐纳德·特朗普总统深谙精心打造脱离现实的叙事之道。

    但在过去两个半月左右的时间里,他编造出一个主要目的似乎是为了自欺欺人的幻境。

    他将伊朗描绘成迫切希望达成协议的一方,仿佛协议总在眼前触手可及。他还一再选择相信伊朗,放宽自己设定的最后期限,收回威胁言论,并淡化伊朗的挑衅行为以及明显违反停火协议的举动。

    这种模式周一再次上演:就在特朗普表示计划攻占哈尔克岛仅数小时后,他再次取消了原定的袭击行动。和以往一样,他声称谈判取得了所谓进展。

    这种做法的问题在于,它已经相当明确地表明特朗普无意重回战争——他更希望彻底了结这一切,即便伊朗一直在利用他的犹豫态度。

    而越来越明显的是,特朗普一味寄望的乐观态度,只是推迟了不可避免的敌对行动重演——就在特朗普最新声称即将达成协议之前,敌对行动已于本周重新爆发。

    特朗普对与伊朗达成潜在协议的不切实际幻想,似乎主要延长了这场战争及其带来的经济痛苦——并让局势更临近2026年中期选举,而伊朗正日益将此次选举作为重要的筹码。

    即便过去24小时内敌对行动升级——主要起因是伊朗击落了一架美军阿帕奇直升机,飞行员最终获救——特朗普也几乎是极不情愿地被拖回了战场。

    在周二的社交媒体帖子中,他淡化了伊朗击落直升机事件的严重性,同时表示:“尽管如此,美国出于必要,必须对此次袭击作出回应。”当天他在接受《华尔街日报》采访时同样表示,伊朗的袭击“没什么大不了”。周三在谈及报复行动时,他说:“我想我们有权这么做。”

    特朗普还夹杂了一些措辞强硬的言论,称他会对伊朗施以重击——甚至在周四的社交媒体上表示,美军很快将“攻占哈尔克岛”,而这场行动可能需要地面部队,还可能造成重大人员伤亡。

    但仅仅几分钟后,他就在福克斯新闻频道上淡化了这一可能性,反复提及美国民众对这类军事行动缺乏“兴趣”。

    “我不确定全国民众是否有意愿这么做,”特朗普说道。

    他很快又重复了一遍:“我不确定全国民众是否有意愿这么做。这没关系,我理解这一点。”

    “我不想派地面部队,但如果我想这么做,我们可以派出一小支军队,占领整个地区,”他说。

    总统随后补充道:“我不知道美国是否有意愿去做我真正更愿意做的事情。”

    但看起来往往是特朗普本人缺乏开战的决心。

    战争初期,他一再为伊朗设定最后期限,要求伊朗投降,否则将采取行动,但即便德黑兰未满足他的要求,他还是放宽了期限。(这也被称为虚张声势。)

    4月7日,特朗普宣布了一项仓促达成的停火协议,似乎没人同意该协议的条款。随后,尽管伊朗并未做到特朗普坚持要求的一件关键之事,政府仍试图维持停火协议的表面姿态。他最初表示,停火协议“取决于……霍尔木兹海峡的全面、立即和安全开放”——但这一要求从未得到落实。

    而当伊朗似乎在其他方面违反停火协议时,特朗普及其政府一再竭力淡化此事。

    特朗普也多次释放出强烈希望避免再次开战的信号。例如,上周他两次提及吉米·卡特和伊朗人质危机这个前车之鉴。

    “我不想让士兵陷入那种危险,”特朗普在6月3日说道。“我记得吉米·卡特在伊朗人质事件中遇到了不少麻烦。我永远不想让我们的人民陷入那种危险。”

    次日,在淡化派遣部队回收高浓缩铀的可能性时,他补充道:“我不想成为吉米·卡特,你懂的——我不想当吉米·卡特。”

    换言之,特朗普不愿再次开战的态度已经毫不掩饰。

    盟友可能会将特朗普的立场浪漫化为一种姿态或战略布局,但这似乎只会鼓励伊朗坚持要求从和平协议中获得更有利的条款。

    事实上,特朗普泄露自己的意图并一再放过对方的做法存在一个问题:这给了伊朗筹码。

    这并不意味着特朗普最终不会大举重启战争。

    但这不禁让人发问,例如,当明确伊朗未满足特朗普提出的停火协议需重新开放海峡的要求时,政府为何没有做出更强烈的回应。

    这似乎是相当严重的违反协议行为,但政府基本对此置之不理。

    而美国两个月来试图迁就伊朗并非没有代价。伊朗最大的优势之一就是时间。尽管特朗普可能认为美国对海峡的封锁正在重创伊朗经济,但他自己也处于竞选时钟的压力之下。

    随着中期选举临近,共和党可能会向特朗普施加更大压力,要求他结束这场看起来可能成为他们政治负担的冲突——因为通胀仍在飙升。这可能迫使他做出一些非常艰难的抉择——要么重回战争,要么以结束这一糟糕局面为名达成一份并非最优的协议。

    而这是特朗普如今越来越无法忽视的一个真实选择。

    本文已补充报道内容并更新。

    How Trump has deceived himself on Iran

    2026-06-11T16:51:41.084Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/11/politics/trump-iran-deceiving-analysis

    • President Donald Trump has repeatedly said a deal with Iran is imminent while backing away from military threats and downplaying Iranian provocations.
    • His pattern of relaxed deadlines and hollow threats has signaled to Tehran that he lacks the will to resume hostilities.
    • With midterm elections approaching, Trump faces mounting pressure to resolve a conflict that may have become a political liability for Republicans.

    AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.

    President Donald Trump is nothing if not studied at crafting elaborate alternate realities.

    But for the last two and a half months or so, he conjured one that seemed primarily aimed at deceiving himself.

    He painted Iran as desperate to cut a deal, which always seemed to be right around the corner. And he repeatedly gave Tehran the benefit of the doubt, relaxed his own deadlines, walked back his threats and downplayed Iran’s provocations and apparent ceasefire violations.

    The pattern played out again Monday, when Trump yet again backed off on threatened attacks just hours after saying he planned to take over Kharg Island. As he has before, he cited supposed progress in negotiating an agreement.

    The problem with this approach is that it has made it pretty clear that Trump lacks the will to go back to war — that he prefers to just be done with it all, even as Iran plays on his reluctance.

    And it increasingly appears as though Trump hoping against hope just delayed an inevitable return to the kind of hostilities that resumed this week before Trump’s latest claim of an imminent bargain.

    Trump’s fanciful treatment of a potential deal with Iran appears to have mostly prolonged the war and its economic pain — and brought the situation closer to the 2026 midterm elections, which increasingly loom as a major leverage point for Iran.

    Even as hostilities intensified over the last 24 hours — largely in the wake of Iran downing a US Army Apache helicopter whose pilots had to be saved — Trump was almost begrudging about being dragged back in.

    In a Tuesday social media post, he downplayed the severity of Iran downing the helicopter while saying, “Nevertheless, the United States must, of necessity, respond to this attack.” He told the Wall Street Journal the same day that Iran’s attack “wasn’t a big deal.” While talking about retaliation, he said Wednesday, “I guess we have the right to do that.”

    Trump has also mixed in some very tough talk about how hard he would hit Iran — even saying on social media on Thursday that the US military would soon “be taking Kharg Island,” an operation that would likely require ground troops and could risk significant casualties.

    But just minutes later, there he was on Fox News downplaying that possibility by repeatedly citing Americans’ lack of “appetite” for such military action.

    “I’m not sure the country has the appetite for it,” Trump said.

    “I’m not sure the country has the appetite for it,” he soon repeated. “And that’s okay, I understand that.”

    “I don’t want to have boots on the ground, but if I wanted to, we could put a small group of soldiers and take over the whole place,” he said.

    The president later added: “I don’t know that America has the appetite to do what I would really much prefer doing.”

    But it often looks like it’s Trump who lacks the stomach.

    Early in the war, he repeatedly set deadlines for Iran to capitulate or else, only to relax them despite Tehran not meeting his demands. (This is also known as bluffing.)

    Trump on April 7 announced a hastily assembled ceasefire whose terms nobody seemed to agree on. Then the administration tried to keep the appearance of the truce going even though Iran didn’t do the one major thing Trump insisted it had to. He initially said the ceasefire was “subject to … the COMPLETE, IMMEDIATE, and SAFE OPENING of the Strait of Hormuz” — which never happened.

    And when Iran seemed to violate the ceasefire in other ways, Trump and his administration repeatedly strained to downplay it.

    Trump has also sent signals that he’d very much like to avoid going back to war. Last week, for example, he twice cited the cautionary tale that was Jimmy Carter and the Iran hostage crisis.

    “I don’t want to put men in that kind of danger,” Trump said on June 3. “I remember Jimmy Carter had some bad problems in Iran with the hostages. I don’t want to ever put our people in that kind of danger.”

    He added the next day, while downplaying the possibility of sending in troops to recover highly enriched uranium: “I didn’t want to be Jimmy Carter, you know — I didn’t feel like being Jimmy Carter.”

    In other words, Trump’s reluctance to go back to war hasn’t been subtle.

    Allies might fancifully view Trump’s position as posturing or some strategic play. But it seems to have only encouraged Iran to hold out for more favorable terms from a peace deal.

    Indeed, that’s the problem with Trump telegraphing what he wants to do and repeatedly giving the other side a pass: It gives Iran leverage.

    That doesn’t mean Trump won’t ultimately go big in restarting the war.

    But it begs the question why the administration didn’t respond more strongly, for instance, when it became clear Iran wasn’t satisfying Trump’s demand that the ceasefire include reopening the strait.

    That seemed a pretty big violation, but the administration basically ignored it.

    And the US trying to accommodate Iran for two months has not been without a cost. One of Iran’s biggest assets is the passage of time. While Trump might view the US blockade of the strait as bleeding the Iranian economy, he’s on the clock too.

    As the midterm elections approach, Republicans will likely be putting more pressure on Trump to wrap up what looks like a potential political albatross for them thanks to still-spiking inflation. That could force some very difficult decisions — i.e. whether to go back to war or to cut a suboptimal deal in the name of bringing this ugly chapter to a close.

    And that’s a real potential choice Trump increasingly can’t ignore.

    This story has been updated with additional reporting.

  • 华盛顿国家广场现疑似“86 47”标记


    2026年6月11日 / 美国东部时间下午3:06 / 哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)新闻

    华盛顿——据从华盛顿纪念碑顶部拍摄的照片显示,周四华盛顿特区国家广场上出现了疑似印有数字“86 47”的标记。

    据路透社报道,该通讯社的一名摄影师在联邦当局抵达调查这一事件前,发现了这些疑似标记。路透社摄影师拍摄的照片显示,草坪上有模糊的“86 47”痕迹,背景是二战纪念碑。

    其中数字“8”最为清晰,“6”和“7”则稍显模糊,数字“4”在照片中最不显眼。目前尚不清楚这些标记是如何留下的,也不清楚是谁留下的。美国公园警察尚未回复置评请求。

    内政部发言人表示:“国家广场上这种疯狂的破坏行为绝不能容忍。内政部会严肃对待任何针对总统的威胁,我们的美国公园警察将调查这一事件,并追究相关责任人的责任。”


    2026年6月11日,从华盛顿纪念碑拍摄的疑似显示国家广场地面“86 47”标记的照片。内森·霍华德 / 路透社


    朝向林肯纪念堂的广角视野照片。内森·霍华德 / 路透社

    根据韦氏词典,“86”是俚语,意为“扔掉”或“摆脱”。该短语常见于餐厅厨房,起源于20世纪30年代的苏打水柜台。但近期,前联邦调查局局长詹姆斯·科米因去年分享了一张海滩贝壳摆成“86 47”的Instagram帖子而被起诉,该术语因此受到更多关注。

    科米删除了该帖子,并表示他认为贝壳排列传递了一个“政治信息”。这位前联邦调查局局长称,他没有意识到一些人将这些数字与暴力联系在一起。

    科米被指控两项威胁特朗普总统的罪名。他尚未认罪,预计将于9月下旬在北卡罗来纳州新伯尔尼接受传讯。

    特朗普总统曾表示,“86”是一个带有暴力含义的暴徒术语,与“47”搭配时意为“杀死特朗普总统”。特朗普是美国第47任总统。

    他今年4月在Truth Social平台上写道:“八英里外,六英尺深!”

    国家广场被称为“美国的前院”,西起林肯纪念堂,东至美国国会大厦,届时将举办多项纪念美国建国250周年的活动。

    扎克·胡达克为本报道撰稿。

    Markings that appear to show the numbers “86 47” seen on National Mall in Washington

    June 11, 2026 / 3:06 PM EDT / CBS News

    Washington — Markings appeared on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., on Thursday that seem to depict the numbers “86 47,” according to photos taken from the top of the Washington Monument.

    A photographer for the Reuters news outlet saw the apparent markings just before federal authorities arrived to look into the incident, according to the wire service. Photos taken by the Reuters photographer show the faint tracings of “86 47” in the grass with the World War II Memorial in the background.

    The “8” appears most prominently, while the numbers “6” and “7” can be seen less clearly. The number “4” is the least visible in the photos. It was not immediately clear how the markings were made or who made them. The U.S. Park Police did not immediately return to a request for comment.

    A spokesperson for the Interior Department said, “The deranged vandalism on our National Mall will not be tolerated. Any threat against the President is taken very seriously by the Department, and our U.S. Park Police will investigate this incident and hold those responsible accountable.”

    A photo taken from the Washington Monument appearing to show “86 47” on the grounds of the National Mall on June 11, 2026. Nathan Howard / REUTERS

    A wider view, looking toward the Lincoln Memorial. Nathan Howard / REUTERS

    The term “86” is slang meaning to “throw out” or “get rid of,” according to Merriam-Webster. The phrase is commonly used in restaurant kitchens and originated at soda counters in the 1930s, according to the dictionary. But the term gained more attention recently when former FBI Director James Comey was indicted after sharing an Instagram post last year that showed seashells on the beach arranged to form “86 47.”

    Comey deleted the post and said he believed the shell formation was communicating a “political message.” The former FBI chief said he did not realize that some people associate the numbers with violence.

    Comey was charged with two counts of making threats against President Trump. He has not yet entered a plea and is set to be arraigned in New Bern, North Carolina, in late September.

    Mr. Trump has said the term “86” is a mob term that connotes violence and, when paired with “47,” means “kill President Trump.” Mr. Trump is the 47th president.

    “EIGHT MILES OUT, SIX FEET DOWN!” he wrote on Truth Social in April.

    Dubbed “America’s Front Yard,” the National Mall stretches from the Lincoln Memorial to the west and the U.S. Capitol to the east. It is set to be the site of several events honoring the nation’s 250th anniversary.

    Zak Hudak contributed to this report.

湘ICP备2026001899号-2