作者: root

  • 乌克兰无人机袭击俄罗斯炼油厂,泽连斯基称若普京继续开战“莫斯科将被焚毁”


    2026年6月18日 美国东部时间7:59 / 哥伦比亚广播公司/美联社

    俄罗斯官员周四表示,乌克兰一周内第二次袭击莫斯科一座大型炼油厂,并中断莫斯科机场的商业航班,这是俄罗斯全面入侵乌克兰四年多以来乌克兰发动的最大规模无人机袭击行动之一。

    乌克兰总统弗拉基米尔·泽连斯基称,此次袭击是对本周俄军袭击基辅一座历史修道院的报复,他还表示“如果俄罗斯继续发动袭击,莫斯科将被焚毁”。

    泽连斯基在发给 WhatsApp 记者群的语音消息中说:“我们不想打这场战争,我们从来都不想,所有人都清楚这一点,我们的盟友也清楚。但如果乌克兰要被焚毁,你们的莫斯科也将被焚毁。”

    他说:“最重要的是,俄罗斯民众开始意识到,发动这场战争的只有普京一人,而普通民众正在为这一切付出代价。”


    2026年6月18日乌克兰无人机袭击莫斯科炼油厂后升起浓烟,摄于社交媒体

    此次袭击发生数小时前,泽连斯基表示,他与特朗普总统和法国总统埃马纽埃尔·马克龙进行了“一次重要的协调通话”,此次通话可能“带来重大变化”。

    泽连斯基称,乌克兰在法国举行的七国集团峰会上赢得了各国领导人进一步支持的关键承诺,其中包括美国的支持。

    俄罗斯媒体发布的画面和视频显示,距离克里姆林宫仅约9英里的莫斯科炼油厂燃起大火,浓密的黑烟笼罩了整座城市。

    据该炼油厂官网信息,莫斯科炼油厂是俄罗斯最大的炼油厂之一,占首都地区燃料市场份额的三分之一以上。该炼油厂上一次遭遇乌克兰无人机袭击是在6月16日,当时发生火灾,但官员称火势很快被扑灭。

    乌克兰多次以俄罗斯石油设施为目标,旨在削减莫斯科的战争经费,让俄罗斯民众感受到入侵的后果。

    本周三名熟悉乌克兰情报评估的乌克兰官员告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,俄罗斯正面临一种关键拦截导弹的短缺,这在很大程度上要归功于乌克兰无人机技术和生产的进步,推动了周四这类袭击次数的增加。

    俄罗斯运输和航空管理部门表示,莫斯科四座机场的航班临时暂停。


    2026年6月18日乌克兰无人机袭击莫斯科炼油厂后升起浓烟,摄于社交媒体

    莫斯科州州长安德烈·沃罗比约夫表示,在周边地区,一架无人机袭击了茹科夫斯基镇的一栋住宅楼,目前该建筑正在疏散人员。

    他还说,该地区其他地方有无人机残骸击中私人住宅、一辆汽车、一座健身中心、一处不明工业设施和一座大型购物中心,购物中心屋顶起火。他表示有一名女性受伤。

    俄罗斯国防部表示,俄军防空部队 overnight 在多个地区击落了555架乌克兰无人机,其中近200架在接近俄罗斯首都时被击落。

    乌克兰空军表示,这一数量大约是俄军 overnight 向乌克兰发射无人机数量的两倍。

    本月早些时候,乌克兰无人机袭击了普京的故乡圣彼得堡,当时普京正在该市与外国贵宾举行一场备受瞩目的经济论坛,此次袭击是普京遭遇的最新一次尴尬事件。

    普京周四在莫斯科以东约430英里的喀山,主持东南亚国家联盟领导人峰会,俄罗斯希望借此加强与该区域集团各国的商业和其他联系。

    泽连斯基在社交媒体上表示:“这是对俄罗斯袭击我们城市和社区的正当回应,也是我们的战士打击支撑俄罗斯战争机器的设施的又一重要成果。现在是结束战争的时候了,俄罗斯必须在外交上采取必要步骤。”

    乌克兰外交大臣安德烈·西比哈在X平台上表示:“今天早上莫斯科市民最常问的问题之一是‘发生了什么?’我可以回答。你们的国家发动了对我们的侵略战争,多年来一直在杀害我们的人民。现在你们知道发生了什么,去问问普京打算什么时候结束这场战争。”

    西方官员和分析人士表示,除了在七国集团峰会上从西方盟友那里获得更多外交和军事援助承诺外,乌克兰近期还依靠高科技无人机在战场上对抗规模更大的俄罗斯军队取得了进展。

    除了扰乱俄罗斯石油生产外,远程无人机袭击还在切断俄军在乌克兰被占领地区的补给线。

    马克龙表示,七国集团峰会“对乌克兰来说非常重要”,因为包括美国在内的支持者承诺提供援助,不过这位法国总统并未透露细节。特朗普执政时期美国削减了对乌克兰的援助,使得欧洲成为最大的军事和财政援助供应方。特朗普与泽连斯基的关系有时较为紧张。

    “美国在乌克兰问题上支持我们,这非常重要,”马克龙说。

    马克龙和特朗普离开巴黎附近的凡尔赛宫后对记者表示:“我们将继续推进援助乌克兰抵抗的工作,帮助其提升自卫和反攻能力。”

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-spoke-with-zelenksyy-and-putin-as-war-rages-on-between-russia-and-ukraine/

    Ukraine drone strike hits Russian oil refinery, Zelenskyy says “Moscow will burn” if Putin continues war

    June 18, 2026 7:59 AM EDT / CBS/AP

    Ukraine hit a major Moscow oil refinery for a second time in a week and disrupted commercial flights at Moscow airports in one of its biggest drone attacks since Russia’s all-out invasion of its neighbor more than four years ago, Russian officials said Thursday.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called the attacks retaliation for a strike that damaged a historic monastery in Kyiv this week, and he said “Moscow will burn” if the Russian attacks continue.

    “We don’t want this war, we never did, and everyone knows it, and our partners know it,” Zelenskiy said in a voice message sent to reporters on a WhatsApp group. “But if Ukraine burns, your Moscow will burn.”

    “The main thing is that the people of Russia begin to feel that it is one man, Putin, who is waging this war, while ordinary people pay the price for everything,” he said.

    Smoke rises from an oil refinery following a Ukrainian drone attack, in Moscow, Russia, June 18, 2026, in a picture obtained from social media. SOCIAL MEDIA/via REUTERS

    The attack came hours after Zelenskyy said he had held “an important coordination call” with President Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron that may “bring about significant change.”

    Zelenskyy said his country had won key pledges of further support from world leaders attending the G7 summit in France, including the U.S.

    Images and video released by the Russian media showed massive fires raging at the Moscow Oil Refinery, located only around 9 miles from the Kremlin. Thick black clouds of smoke rose over the city.

    The Moscow Oil Refinery is one of Russia’s biggest refineries, according to its official website, and accounts for more than a third of the fuel market of the capital region. It was last attacked by Ukrainian drones on June 16, catching fire, but officials said the blaze was swiftly put out.

    Ukraine has repeatedly targeted Russia’s oil facilities, aiming to cut Moscow’s revenue for the war and make Russians feel the consequences of the invasion.

    Three Ukrainian officials familiar with the country’s intelligence assessments told CBS News this week that Russia was facing shortages of a key type of interceptor missile, thanks in large part to advances in Ukrainian drone technology and production leading to an increase in the kind of strikes carried out Thursday.

    Flights from four Moscow airports were temporarily halted, transport and aviation authorities said.

    Smoke rises from an oil refinery following a Ukrainian drone attack in Moscow, Russia, June 18, 2026, in a picture obtained from social media. SOCIAL MEDIA/via REUTERS

    In the surrounding Moscow region, a drone hit a residential building in the town of Zhukovsky, and the building was being evacuated, according to Gov. Andrei Vorobyov.

    Elsewhere in the region, drone debris hit private houses, a car, a fitness center, an unspecified industrial facility and a large mall, whose roof caught fire, Vorobyov said. One woman was injured, he said.

    The Russian Defense Ministry said that its air defenses overnight shot down 555 Ukrainian drones over multiple regions, with almost 200 intercepted as they were approaching the Russian capital.

    That was roughly double the number of drones that Russia launched at Ukraine overnight, according to the Ukrainian air force.

    The attack was the latest embarrassment for Russian President Vladimir Putin after a Ukrainian drone attack on his hometown of St. Petersburg earlier this month just as he held a showcase economic forum in the city with foreign VIP visitors.

    Putin on Thursday was in Kazan, some 430 miles east of Moscow, hosting leaders of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations as Russia seeks to bolster business and other ties with the nations of the regional bloc.

    “This is a fully justified response to Russian attacks on our cities and communities, and another important result of our warriors’ work against facilities that sustain Russia’s war machine,” Ukraine’s Zelenskyy said on social media. “It is time the war ended, and Russia must take the necessary steps in diplomacy.”

    Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha said on X: “One of the most popular questions asked by Muscovites this morning is ‘What is going on?’ I can answer. Your country started a war of aggression against ours. For years, it has been killing our people. Now that you know what’s going on, ask Putin when he is planning to end it.”

    As well as gaining pledges of more diplomatic and military help from Western supporters at the G7 summit, Ukraine recently has gained momentum on the battlefield against Russia’s bigger army thanks to its high-tech drones, Western officials and analysts say.

    As well as disrupting Russian oil production, longer-range drone strikes are choking Russian supply lines in occupied regions of Ukraine.

    Macron said the G7 summit was “very important for Ukraine” because its supporters – crucially including the United States – vowed to help it, although the French president provided no details. The U.S. under Trump has cut back assistance to Ukraine, leaving the Europeans as the biggest suppliers of military and financial aid. Trump and Zelenskyy have had an at times strained relationship.

    ″America is with us on Ukraine, that is very important,″ Macron said.

    ″And now we will continue to advance to help Ukraine to resist″ and to build up its ″capacity to defend itself and capacity to counterattack,” Macron told reporters as he and Trump left the Palace of Versailles near Paris.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-spoke-with-zelenksyy-and-putin-as-war-rages-on-between-russia-and-ukraine/

  • 阿联酋规定15岁为社交媒体最低使用年龄


    2026年6月18日 17:29 / 联合早报

    阿拉伯联合酋长国星期四(6月18日)批准一项决议,将社交媒体最低使用年龄设定为15岁。 (路透社)

    阿拉伯联合酋长国星期四(6月18日)批准一项决议,将社交媒体最低使用年龄设定为15岁,成为首个实施这类规定的阿拉伯国家。

    路透社引述阿联酋政府媒体办公室发布的声明,15岁以下儿童不得创建或使用个人社交媒体账户,也无法使用相关平台的全部功能。

    阿联酋规定15岁为社交媒体最低使用年龄

    2026年6月18日 17:29 / 联合早报

    阿拉伯联合酋长国星期四(6月18日)批准一项决议,将社交媒体最低使用年龄设定为15岁。 (路透社)

    阿拉伯联合酋长国星期四(6月18日)批准一项决议,将社交媒体最低使用年龄设定为15岁,成为首个实施这类规定的阿拉伯国家。

    路透社引述阿联酋政府媒体办公室发布的声明,15岁以下儿童不得创建或使用个人社交媒体账户,也无法使用相关平台的全部功能。

  • 全球反无人机需求激增 2030年市场规模料超100亿美元


    您提供的内容本身就是中文,且是已发布的新闻稿件,无需进行翻译。如果您需要将其他英文新闻翻译成中文,可以提供对应的英文原文,我会按照要求为您完成翻译。

    反无人机领域正吸引数十亿美元的投资,它的应用范围已远远超出军事领域,扩展到能源、航运、数据中心、酒店和机场等行业。图为2025年12月4日,一架无人机飞过位于德国卡塞尔的反无人机装置。 (路透社)

    (柏林路透电)无人机入侵扰乱欧洲机场以及袭击中东油田等基础设施,为雷达、干扰器和防御飞行器带来巨大商机,据估计全球反无人机市场正以20%的年增长率快速扩张。

    多年来,无人机技术已给机场带来诸多不便,伦敦盖特威克等机场在2020年之前就曾因无人机警报而被迫暂停航班。随后俄乌战争和中东战争引发的无人机入侵事件,使这些担忧达到了前所未有的程度。

    反无人机领域正吸引数十亿美元的投资,它的应用范围已远远超出军事领域,扩展到能源、航运、数据中心、酒店和机场等行业。

    例如,在挪威境内运营43个机场的Avinor公司已在其机场安装无人机侦察系统,以应对民用无人机入侵对空中交通造成的干扰和延误。

    路透社访问了六家反无人机公司的高管,他们表示来自政府、机场和民用基础设施运营商的订单急剧增加。总部位于荷兰的反无人机公司RobinRadar首席执行官哈明加说:“很多人联系我们,这确实产生了直接影响。”

    延伸阅读

    韩国世界杯训练场出现无人机 被墨西哥军方拦截乌克兰对莫斯科发动创纪录的无人机袭击 直逼炼油厂

    面对庞大上商机,反无人机企业纷纷推出新产品,例如美国Dedrone公司研制出枪形干扰器;波音公司推出一种可与战斗机一同飞行的自主“僚机”,它可更换的机头内装有反无人机干扰器和武器。

    分析师估计,全球反无人机市场规模约为30亿至70亿美元(约39亿到90亿新元),并以每年约20%的速度增长。市场咨询公司MarketsandMarkets则预测,到了2030年,反无人机市场规模将从目前的45亿美元扩展至145亿美元。

    美国无人机探测雷达制造商Echodyne首席执行官弗兰肯伯格说,市场对该公司雷达的需求量去年增加超过一倍,这增长势头至今未见放缓,他们的新厂今年将投入生产,年产能将翻一番,雷达产量将超过3万台。

    尽管反无人机技术备受青睐,但监管方面的挑战和安全问题限制了它在军事领域之外的推广应用。民用机场对于反无人机技术有着严格的限制,目前主要侧重于无人机探测工具。反无人机干扰器可能会扰乱通信和导航,因此不适于在机场周边使用。此外,在民用环境中一般不能使用武器击落无人机。

  • 全球反无人机需求激增 2030年市场规模料超100亿美元


    您提供的内容本身就是简体中文,无需进行翻译。如果您是需要将其他语言(比如英语)的反无人机市场相关新闻翻译成中文,或者有其他语言的原文需要处理,请提供对应的英文原文内容。

    反无人机领域正吸引数十亿美元的投资,它的应用范围已远远超出军事领域,扩展到能源、航运、数据中心、酒店和机场等行业。图为2025年12月4日,一架无人机飞过位于德国卡塞尔的反无人机装置。 (路透社)

    (柏林路透电)无人机入侵扰乱欧洲机场以及袭击中东油田等基础设施,为雷达、干扰器和防御飞行器带来巨大商机,据估计全球反无人机市场正以20%的年增长率快速扩张。

    多年来,无人机技术已给机场带来诸多不便,伦敦盖特威克等机场在2020年之前就曾因无人机警报而被迫暂停航班。随后俄乌战争和中东战争引发的无人机入侵事件,使这些担忧达到了前所未有的程度。

    反无人机领域正吸引数十亿美元的投资,它的应用范围已远远超出军事领域,扩展到能源、航运、数据中心、酒店和机场等行业。

    例如,在挪威境内运营43个机场的Avinor公司已在其机场安装无人机侦察系统,以应对民用无人机入侵对空中交通造成的干扰和延误。

    路透社访问了六家反无人机公司的高管,他们表示来自政府、机场和民用基础设施运营商的订单急剧增加。总部位于荷兰的反无人机公司RobinRadar首席执行官哈明加说:“很多人联系我们,这确实产生了直接影响。”

    面对庞大上商机,反无人机企业纷纷推出新产品,例如美国Dedrone公司研制出枪形干扰器;波音公司推出一种可与战斗机一同飞行的自主“僚机”,它可更换的机头内装有反无人机干扰器和武器。

    分析师估计,全球反无人机市场规模约为30亿至70亿美元(约39亿到90亿新元),并以每年约20%的速度增长。市场咨询公司MarketsandMarkets则预测,到了2030年,反无人机市场规模将从目前的45亿美元扩展至145亿美元。

    美国无人机探测雷达制造商Echodyne首席执行官弗兰肯伯格说,市场对该公司雷达的需求量去年增加超过一倍,这增长势头至今未见放缓,他们的新厂今年将投入生产,年产能将翻一番,雷达产量将超过3万台。

    尽管反无人机技术备受青睐,但监管方面的挑战和安全问题限制了它在军事领域之外的推广应用。民用机场对于反无人机技术有着严格的限制,目前主要侧重于无人机探测工具。反无人机干扰器可能会扰乱通信和导航,因此不适于在机场周边使用。此外,在民用环境中一般不能使用武器击落无人机。

  • 不满涉以言论 以色列外长切断与欧盟最高外交官联系


    2026年6月18日 18:10 / 联合早报

    据欧洲动态新闻网(Euractiv)独家报道,卡拉斯在墨西哥举行的高级别闭门会谈中,将以色列对待加沙和约旦河西岸巴勒斯坦人的方式,与南非种族隔离政策相提并论。图为卡拉斯在欧洲议会就中东局势发表讲话。 (法新社)

    以色列外交部长萨尔宣布,鉴于有报道称欧盟外交与安全政策高级代表卡拉斯将以色列与南非种族隔离政权相提并论,他将切断与卡拉斯的所有联系。

    萨尔星期四(6月18日)在社媒平台X发文说:“最近有报道说,她(卡拉斯)在访问墨西哥期间,将以色列比作南非曾经存在的种族隔离政权……迄今为止,她对此事未作任何否认、回应或评论。”

    他进而写道:“因此,作为以色列外交部长,我别无选择,只能切断与卡拉斯女士的一切联系,直到她收回对世界上唯一犹太国家——也是中东唯一民主国家——的血祭诽谤(blood libel)。”

    “血祭诽谤”指的是一则反犹谣言,声称犹太人会谋杀基督教徒的孩子,用这些小孩的血来进行宗教仪式。

    萨尔还在贴文中说:“欧盟长期以来一直对以色列国采取偏执且可耻的欺骗行为。”

    据欧洲动态新闻网(Euractiv)上周独家报道,卡拉斯在墨西哥举行的高级别闭门会谈中,将以色列对待加沙和约旦河西岸巴勒斯坦人的方式,与南非种族隔离政策相提并论。

    包括列席官员和外交官在内的多名人士告诉欧洲动态新闻网,卡拉斯描述了去年访南非和在约翰内斯堡参观种族隔离博物馆的经历,称自己深受触动。

    她承认以色列拥有自卫权,但同时表明,以色列对哈马斯2023年10月7日跨境袭击的回应,与南非所指控的种族灭绝行为相称,并称以色列在约旦河西岸的定居点破坏以巴两国方案的可能。

    不满涉以言论 以色列外长切断与欧盟最高外交官联系

    2026年6月18日 18:10 / 联合早报

    据欧洲动态新闻网(Euractiv)独家报道,卡拉斯在墨西哥举行的高级别闭门会谈中,将以色列对待加沙和约旦河西岸巴勒斯坦人的方式,与南非种族隔离政策相提并论。图为卡拉斯在欧洲议会就中东局势发表讲话。 (法新社)

    以色列外交部长萨尔宣布,鉴于有报道称欧盟外交与安全政策高级代表卡拉斯将以色列与南非种族隔离政权相提并论,他将切断与卡拉斯的所有联系。

    萨尔星期四(6月18日)在社媒平台X发文说:“最近有报道说,她(卡拉斯)在访问墨西哥期间,将以色列比作南非曾经存在的种族隔离政权……迄今为止,她对此事未作任何否认、回应或评论。”

    他进而写道:“因此,作为以色列外交部长,我别无选择,只能切断与卡拉斯女士的一切联系,直到她收回对世界上唯一犹太国家——也是中东唯一民主国家——的血祭诽谤(blood libel)。”

    “血祭诽谤”指的是一则反犹谣言,声称犹太人会谋杀基督教徒的孩子,用这些小孩的血来进行宗教仪式。

    萨尔还在贴文中说:“欧盟长期以来一直对以色列国采取偏执且可耻的欺骗行为。”

    据欧洲动态新闻网(Euractiv)上周独家报道,卡拉斯在墨西哥举行的高级别闭门会谈中,将以色列对待加沙和约旦河西岸巴勒斯坦人的方式,与南非种族隔离政策相提并论。

    包括列席官员和外交官在内的多名人士告诉欧洲动态新闻网,卡拉斯描述了去年访南非和在约翰内斯堡参观种族隔离博物馆的经历,称自己深受触动。

    她承认以色列拥有自卫权,但同时表明,以色列对哈马斯2023年10月7日跨境袭击的回应,与南非所指控的种族灭绝行为相称,并称以色列在约旦河西岸的定居点破坏以巴两国方案的可能。

  • 不满涉以言论 以色列外长切断与欧盟最高外交官联系


    2026年6月18日 18:10 / 联合早报

    不满涉以言论 以色列外长切断与欧盟最高外交官联系

    据欧洲动态新闻网(Euractiv)独家报道,卡拉斯在墨西哥举行的高级别闭门会谈中,将以色列对待加沙和约旦河西岸巴勒斯坦人的方式,与南非种族隔离政策相提并论。图为卡拉斯在欧洲议会就中东局势发表讲话。 (法新社)

    以色列外交部长萨尔宣布,鉴于有报道称欧盟外交与安全政策高级代表卡拉斯将以色列与南非种族隔离政权相提并论,他将切断与卡拉斯的所有联系。

    萨尔星期四(6月18日)在社媒平台X发文说:“最近有报道说,她(卡拉斯)在访问墨西哥期间,将以色列比作南非曾经存在的种族隔离政权……迄今为止,她对此事未作任何否认、回应或评论。”

    他进而写道:“因此,作为以色列外交部长,我别无选择,只能切断与卡拉斯女士的一切联系,直到她收回对世界上唯一犹太国家——也是中东唯一民主国家——的血祭诽谤(blood libel)。”

    “血祭诽谤”指的是一则反犹谣言,声称犹太人会谋杀基督教徒的孩子,用这些小孩的血来进行宗教仪式。

    萨尔还在贴文中说:“欧盟长期以来一直对以色列国采取偏执且可耻的欺骗行为。”

    法英挪拟绕开布鲁塞尔联手协调制裁以色列
    西班牙将提议欧盟暂停与以色列联系国协议

    据欧洲动态新闻网(Euractiv)上周独家报道,卡拉斯在墨西哥举行的高级别闭门会谈中,将以色列对待加沙和约旦河西岸巴勒斯坦人的方式,与南非种族隔离政策相提并论。

    包括列席官员和外交官在内的多名人士告诉欧洲动态新闻网,卡拉斯描述了去年访南非和在约翰内斯堡参观种族隔离博物馆的经历,称自己深受触动。

    她承认以色列拥有自卫权,但同时表明,以色列对哈马斯2023年10月7日跨境袭击的回应,与南非所指控的种族灭绝行为相称,并称以色列在约旦河西岸的定居点破坏以巴两国方案的可能。

    据欧洲动态新闻网(Euractiv)独家报道,卡拉斯在墨西哥举行的高级别闭门会谈中,将以色列对待加沙和约旦河西岸巴勒斯坦人的方式,与南非种族隔离政策相提并论。图为卡拉斯在欧洲议会就中东局势发表讲话。 (法新社)

    以色列外交部长萨尔宣布,鉴于有报道称欧盟外交与安全政策高级代表卡拉斯将以色列与南非种族隔离政权相提并论,他将切断与卡拉斯的所有联系。

    萨尔星期四(6月18日)在社媒平台X发文说:“最近有报道说,她(卡拉斯)在访问墨西哥期间,将以色列比作南非曾经存在的种族隔离政权……迄今为止,她对此事未作任何否认、回应或评论。”

    他进而写道:“因此,作为以色列外交部长,我别无选择,只能切断与卡拉斯女士的一切联系,直到她收回对世界上唯一犹太国家——也是中东唯一民主国家——的血祭诽谤(blood libel)。”

    “血祭诽谤”指的是一则反犹谣言,声称犹太人会谋杀基督教徒的孩子,用这些小孩的血来进行宗教仪式。

    萨尔还在贴文中说:“欧盟长期以来一直对以色列国采取偏执且可耻的欺骗行为。”

    法英挪拟绕开布鲁塞尔联手协调制裁以色列
    西班牙将提议欧盟暂停与以色列联系国协议

    据欧洲动态新闻网(Euractiv)上周独家报道,卡拉斯在墨西哥举行的高级别闭门会谈中,将以色列对待加沙和约旦河西岸巴勒斯坦人的方式,与南非种族隔离政策相提并论。

    包括列席官员和外交官在内的多名人士告诉欧洲动态新闻网,卡拉斯描述了去年访南非和在约翰内斯堡参观种族隔离博物馆的经历,称自己深受触动。

    她承认以色列拥有自卫权,但同时表明,以色列对哈马斯2023年10月7日跨境袭击的回应,与南非所指控的种族灭绝行为相称,并称以色列在约旦河西岸的定居点破坏以巴两国方案的可能。

  • 舍伍德森林里那棵与罗宾汉传说相关的1200岁橡树已死亡,保护组织称:“对所有人来说都令人心碎”


    2026-06-18T07:24:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    一棵与罗宾汉传说紧密相关的巨型古树可能因游客过度喜爱而“死亡”。

    英国皇家鸟类保护协会周四表示,这棵位于舍伍德森林、已有1200年树龄的“大橡树”今年春天未长出新叶,据此可确认其已死亡。

    该环保组织称,尽管这棵巨型橡树周围的区域已用围栏隔开,但过去两个世纪以来,前来观赏它扭曲枝干和茂密树冠的游客在诺丁汉当地踩踏了土壤,导致雨水难以渗入树根。

    多年来,这片森林一直面临威胁,这棵树过去也曾被传死亡,但该组织后来证实它仍存活。

    但这次情况不同了。

    “这棵树今年未能长出新叶,对所有人来说都令人心碎,”英国皇家鸟类保护协会的霍莉·德雷克在宣布橡树死亡的声明中说道。


    image
    2007年10月19日在英格兰诺丁汉郡拍摄的“大橡树”,传说中罗宾汉曾在此藏身。美联社/西蒙·道森

    据说这棵树曾为传奇13世纪绿林好汉罗宾汉提供庇护——他劫富济贫,在被诺丁汉郡长追捕时藏身于这片森林。

    1790年,海曼·鲁克少校在一本关于橡树的书中提及这棵树,此后首批游客蜂拥而至,它也因此得名“大橡树”。

    目前无法确定这棵树的具体死因,但数百万游客的踩踏是其衰落的原因之一,此外还有用钢缆和支架加固其巨大枝干的干预措施。导致其死亡的原因还有气候变化带来的热浪和干旱。

    树木专家发现,其根系被挤压窒息且营养不良。

    “像大橡树这样的古树是英国的‘保护级白犀牛’,但它们的衰落却远不那么引人注目,”伍德兰信托基金的埃德·派恩说道,“保护它们对我们所处世界的健康至关重要,然而大多数古树都在悄无声息中消失,没有获得像大橡树这样的关注或照料。”

    除了在民间传说中的地位,这片森林还因出产木材闻名:18世纪末至19世纪初,舍伍德橡树为副海军上将霍雷肖·纳尔逊的皇家海军舰船提供了木材,其木材还被用于伦敦圣保罗大教堂的屋顶建造。

    大橡树幸免于砍伐,自20世纪70年代以来一直受到围栏保护。


    image
    2013年6月30日资料照片,一名男孩站在英格兰舍伍德森林大橡树的围栏上。哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    英国皇家鸟类保护协会表示:“尽管这标志着大橡树作为活树的生命走到了尽头,但这并不意味着它的故事就此终结。”

    “这棵树及其下方的土壤将继续成为野生动物的重要庇护所,我们在照料大橡树过程中获得的知识,将有助于保护全国其他的古老橡树,”该组织说道,“通过与合作伙伴制定相关计划,它的遗产将通过其幼苗和与之相关的传说延续下去,这棵树在死后也将继续成为野生动物的重要庇护所。”

    德雷克表示,这棵树将成为人们可以参观的纪念物,“它将活在罗宾汉的传说中,并在死后继续为森林生态系统提供与生前同等的支持。”

    1,200-year-old Robin Hood oak tree in Sherwood Forest has died, group says: “Heartbreaking for everyone”

    2026-06-18T07:24:00-0400 / CBS News

    A massive ancient oak tree linked to the legend of Robin Hood may have been loved to death.

    The 1,200-year-old Major Oak in Sherwood Forest is believed to have died after it didn’t sprout leaves this spring, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds said Thursday.

    Visitors over the past two centuries who viewed the tree’s gnarled limbs and sprawling canopy in Nottingham compressed the soil, making it difficult for rain to reach its roots, the conservation group said, despite the immediate area around the massive oak being fenced off.

    The forest has been under threat for years and the tree had been rumored to have died in the past — only to have the group confirm it was still alive.

    That is no longer the case.

    “The tree’s failure to produce leaves this year is heartbreaking for everyone,” Hollie Drake of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds said in a statement announcing the death.

    The “Major Oak” tree, where Robin Hood allegedly used as a hide out in Sherwood Forest, is seen in Nottinghamshire, England, Oct. 19, 2007. AP/SIMON DAWSON

    The tree is said to have sheltered Robin Hood, the legendary 13th-century bandit who stole from the rich and gave to the poor and took refuge in the forest when being pursued by the sheriff of Nottingham.

    It got its name after being mentioned in a book on oak trees by Major Hayman Rooke in 1790 that led to the first wave of fans who flocked to the forest.

    It’s impossible to say what killed the tree, but the footprints of millions contributed to its downfall, along with intervention to shore up its massive limbs using cables and poles. Climate change that has brought heat waves and drought was also blamed.

    Tree experts found the root system strangled and starved.

    “Ancient trees like the Major Oak are the ‘conservation white rhinos of the U.K.’ but their decline is far less visible,” said Ed Pyne, of the Woodland Trust. “Saving them is vital to the health of the world we live in and yet most disappear quietly, without the recognition or care given to the Major Oak.”

    In addition to its place in folklore, the forest is known for Sherwood oaks that floated the ships of Vice Admiral Horatio Nelson’s Royal Navy in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, and as timbers in the roof of St. Paul’s Cathedral in London.

    The Major Oak was spared from the saw and had been protected by a fence since the 1970s.

    A boy stands on the fence surrounding the Major Oak in Sherwood Forest, England, in a June 30, 2013 file photo. CBS News

    “Although this marks the end of the Major Oak as a living tree, it does not mark the end of its story,” the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds said.

    “The tree and soil beneath it will continue to be a vital refuge for wildlife and the knowledge we have gained by looking after the Major Oak will help preserve other ancient oaks across the country,” the group said. “Its legacy will live on through its saplings and the legends associated with it, with plans being drawn up with our partners, and the tree will continue to be a vital refuge for wildlife.”

    Drake said the tree will be a monument that people can visit, “living on in the legend of Robin Hood and continuing to provide as much support to the forest’s ecosystem in death as in life.”

  • 独家报道:特朗普政府加大力度剥夺归化美国公民的国籍


    2026-06-18T08:00:25.491Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    • 特朗普政府计划在10月前提起至少250起剥夺国籍诉讼,这是其取消公民身份行动的大幅升级。
    • 司法部在不到两个月的时间里已经提起了29起相关诉讼,远超每年不足10起的年均数量。
    • 民事诉讼律师已从其他部门抽调,专门处理针对被指控存在欺诈或犯罪行为的归化公民的案件。

    本文由AI生成摘要,经CNN编辑审核。

    据司法部一名高级官员透露,特朗普政府计划在10月前提起至少250起剥夺国籍诉讼,大幅强化其取消归化美国公民国籍的行动。

    今年不到两个月的时间里,司法部就已提起29起针对外籍裔美国人的剥夺国籍诉讼,指控他们通过欺诈手段获取美国公民身份。

    根据锡拉丘兹大学交易记录获取清算所的数据,2008年至2026年6月12日期间,美国共提起166起剥夺国籍诉讼,年均不足10起。目前司法部的办案速度已远超往年,民事诉讼律师正在积极审查更多案件以提起诉讼。

    此次行动是唐纳德·特朗普总统更广泛、激进的移民议程的一部分——该议程早已超越了针对非法入境者的范畴——也揭示了联邦机构如何调整资源以优先推进该议程。

    据这位司法部高级官员透露,在幕后,司法部已从多个部门抽调民事诉讼律师——包括负责调查欺诈案件的人员,而政府曾将欺诈调查标榜为另一项首要任务——来处理剥夺国籍诉讼。与此同时,许多美国检察官办公室早已承受巨大压力,相关案件正被分派至这些办公室。

    “这是国会数十年来写入法律的合法手段,”这位司法部高级官员告诉CNN,并补充道,剥夺国籍诉讼应被优先处理,“以保护美国公民身份的完整性,确保那些身处美国并享受公民福利的人是依法获得公民身份的,确保合适的人群才能获取公民身份。”

    特朗普政府目前提起的案件涉及被指控在归化申请过程中或此前存在欺诈行为、猥亵未成年人或支持恐怖主义的人员。

    根据联邦法规,如果个人在归化申请过程中作出与申请相关的虚假陈述,或通过非法手段获取公民身份——即他们本不具备申请资格——联邦政府有权撤销其公民身份。剥夺国籍诉讼通常属于上述两类之一,随后将根据具体情况以民事或刑事案件形式推进。

    剥夺国籍程序不适用于在美国出生、凭借出生权获得公民身份的人群。(另外,特朗普曾试图通过行政命令终止自动出生权公民身份,美国最高法院即将对该政策举措的合法性作出裁决。)

    根据美国公民及移民服务局的数据,过去十年里,近800万人成为归化美国公民。

    司法部助理部长布雷特·舒梅特2025年6月的一份备忘录显示,政府已表明将优先处理剥夺国籍案件。舒梅特列出了10类优先案件,包括对国家安全构成威胁的人员、犯下战争罪的人员、存在欺诈行为的人员,以及在归化申请过程中未披露重罪的人员等。

    “这些分类旨在指导民事 division 优先处理哪些案件;不过,这些分类并未限制民事 division 追究任何特定案件,也未按重要性排序,”备忘录中写道。

    剥夺国籍专案组由12名律师组成,他们正在处理积压案件,并持续接收国土安全部转来的案件。这位司法部高级官员表示,积压案件包括身份欺诈案件、前科案件、战争罪案件和恐怖主义案件。

    不过,鉴于案件数量庞大,司法部正从民事 division 的其他办公室抽调人员,包括民事欺诈律师、办公室前线的政治任命官员以及其他律师,以扩大办案能力。

    与此同时,美国检察官办公室也在接收案件,并根据案件的起诉地点将其分派至全国各地。这位司法部高级官员表示,美国检察官办公室可能还会提起“数百起更多”的案件。

    此类案件工作量大且耗时,这也是历届政府在很大程度上仅专注于战争罪和恐怖主义相关人员的部分原因。

    例如,拜登政府四年间总共仅提起了24起相关案件,据司法部数据显示。

    “他们或许能够加快案件提起的流程,但无论在立案前采取何种步骤,诉讼程序本身仍将是他们大规模剥夺公民身份目标的巨大阻碍,”曾在多届政府时期任职于司法部、现为正义联系组织创始人兼执行董事的斯泰西·杨说道。

    剥夺国籍的情况极为罕见,且仅能在联邦法院进行。历史上,美国曾出于多种理由撤销公民身份,包括谎报入境日期、年龄或婚姻状况,以及政治原因。例如,二战期间,美国对亲纳粹的德裔美国人的归化案件进行了审查。

    据熟悉此类案件的人士告诉CNN,司法部的律师此前曾将工作重点放在那些被认定犯下严重罪行的人员身上,这使得他们提交给法院的案件更为明确。不过如今,一些司法部律师感受到越来越大的压力,需要依据法律追究任何可被论证的案件——哪怕是基于文件填写方式的所谓欺诈行为,这些人士说道。

    司法部官员坚称,该机构的工作重点是那些在申请美国公民身份时谎报犯罪记录或在申请期间持续实施犯罪行为的人员。

    “收到停车罚单的人——不会成为我们投入资源关注的对象,甚至可能都不符合法律规定的剥夺国籍条件,”这位司法部高级官员表示。“我们真正关注的是那些对美国实施严重欺诈的人员,找出这些个体并尽快推进程序。”

    “获得美国公民身份是一项特权,在特朗普总统的坚定领导下,司法部对滥用这一程序的行为采取零容忍政策,”代理司法部长托德·布兰奇在6月的一份声明中说道。

    如果政府在剥夺国籍诉讼中胜诉,该人员将恢复获得美国公民身份之前的移民身份。通常情况下,他们会恢复永久居民身份,不过根据剥夺国籍的具体原因,他们也可能面临驱逐出境程序。

    “之所以有如此完善的保护措施,之所以采用清晰且令人信服的证据标准,等等,都是源于最高法院的判例,”波士顿学院法学院教授丹尼尔·坎斯特鲁姆说道。

    坎斯特鲁姆指出,政府对剥夺国籍案件的重视“可能令人担忧”,但目前尚未到引发警觉的地步,因为目前已提起的案件总体上符合历届政府曾追究的案件类型。

    CNN的汉娜·拉比诺维茨为本报道作出了贡献。

    Exclusive: Trump administration ramps up effort to revoke citizenship from naturalized Americans

    2026-06-18T08:00:25.491Z / CNN

    • The Trump administration plans to file at least 250 denaturalization cases by October, a significant increase in efforts to revoke citizenship.
    • The Justice Department has already filed 29 cases in less than two months, far exceeding the annual average of less than 10.
    • Civil litigators have been pulled from other divisions to pursue these cases targeting naturalized citizens accused of fraud or crimes.

    AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.

    The Trump administration plans to file at least 250 denaturalization cases by October, significantly intensifying its effort to revoke citizenship from people naturalized in the United States, according to a senior Justice Department official.

    In less than two months this year, the Justice Department has filed 29 denaturalization cases targeting foreign-born Americans whom it accuses of fraudulently obtaining US citizenship.

    Civil litigators are actively reviewing additional cases to file as the department picks up a pace that has already surpassed previous years: Between 2008 and June 12, 2026, 166 denaturalization complaints were filed, an annual average of less than 10, according to Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse.

    The push is part of President Donald Trump’s broader, aggressive immigration agenda — which has gone well beyond targeting people in the country illegally — and reveals how federal agencies have shifted resources to prioritize that agenda.

    Behind the scenes, the Justice Department has pulled civil litigators from various divisions — including those assigned to investigating fraud, which the administration has flaunted as another top priority — to pursue denaturalization cases, according to the senior DOJ official. The cases are also being sent to US attorney offices at a time when many are already under immense strain.

    “This is a lawful tool that Congress has had on the books for decades,” the senior DOJ official told CNN, adding that denaturalization cases should be prioritized “to protect the integrity of American citizenship and make sure people who are present in this country and have enjoyed the benefits of citizenship are doing so lawfully, and the right people are acquiring citizenship.”

    The cases filed by the Trump administration so far include people who are accused of committing fraud, sexual abuse of a minor, or expressed support for terrorism before or during the naturalization process.

    The federal government has the authority in federal statute to move toward revoking citizenship of an individual if they made false statements that were relevant to the naturalization process or if the citizenship was illegally procured, meaning they weren’t eligible for it. Denaturalization cases generally fall under one of those categories and then proceed as civil or criminal cases depending on the circumstances.

    Denaturalizations do not apply to those who were born in the country and received citizenship through birthright. (Separately, Trump has attempted, via executive order, to end automatic birthright citizenship. The Supreme Court will soon rule on whether that policy move is legal.)

    In the last decade, nearly 8 million people became naturalized US citizens, according to US Citizenship and Immigration Services.

    The administration signaled its intent to prioritize denaturalizations in a June 2025 memo from Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate. Shumate listed 10 categories of priorities for cases, including individuals who pose a danger to national security, engaged in war crimes, engaged in fraud, or committed felonies not disclosed during the naturalization process, among others.

    “These categories are intended to guide the Civil Division in prioritizing which cases to pursue; however, these categories do not limit the Civil Division from pursuing any particular case, nor are they listed in a particular order of importance,” the memo reads.

    The denaturalization unit is made up of 12 attorneys who are working through a backlog of cases and continuing to field referrals from the Department of Homeland Security. The backlog includes identity fraud cases, as well as prior conviction cases, war criminal cases, and terrorism cases, the senior DOJ official said.

    Given the volume, however, the Justice Department is pulling from other offices in its civil division, including civil fraud attorneys, political appointees in the front office, among other attorneys to expand capacity.

    US attorney offices, meanwhile, are also being referred cases and distributing those around the country depending on where the case will be filed. The senior DOJ official said US attorney offices may file “several hundred more” cases.

    The cases are intensive and time-consuming, which is partly why previous administrations have largely focused on people involved in war crimes and terrorism.

    The Biden administration, for example, filed a total of 24 cases over four years, according to the Justice Department.

    “They may be able to expedite the process for initiating these cases, but regardless of the steps they take before cases are filed, the litigation process itself is still going to be a huge impediment to their goal of denaturalizing people in huge numbers,” said Stacey Young, who served at DOJ under multiple administrations and is the founder and executive director of Justice Connection.

    Denaturalization is rare and can only occur in federal court. Historically, the US revoked citizenship for a range of reasons, from lying about a person’s date of arrival, age or marital status to political reasons. During World War II, for example, the US reviewed naturalization cases of German Americans who were pro-Nazi.

    Lawyers in the Justice Department had previously focused their efforts on people who had been found guilty of egregious crimes, making the cases they’d bring to court more clear cut, people familiar with these cases told CNN. These days, though, some Justice Department lawyers are feeling a building pressure to pursue any case that can be argued under the law — even alleged fraud based on how paperwork was filled out, the people told CNN.

    Justice Department officials maintain that the agency is focusing on people who lied about criminal history or criminal acts that were ongoing when they applied for US citizenship.

    “People who got a parking ticket — that’s not going to be somebody that we’re going to focus our resources on and may not even qualify for denaturalization under the statute,” the senior DOJ official said. “It’s really about finding people who have committed serious fraud against the United States and identifying those individuals and proceeding as quickly as we can.”

    “Gaining U.S. citizenship is a privilege and under the steadfast leadership of President Trump, this Department of Justice maintains a zero-tolerance policy for the abuse of this process,” said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche in a June statement.

    If the administration succeeds in a denaturalization case, that person will return to the immigration status they had prior to acquiring US citizenship. Generally, they usually return to their permanent resident status, though depending on the reasons for their denaturalization, they could also face deportation proceedings.

    “The reason for the robustness of the protections, the reason the standard is clear and convincing evidence, etc. is because of Supreme Court decisions,” said Daniel Kanstroom, professor of law at Boston College Law School.

    Kanstroom noted that the emphasis on denaturalizations by the administration is “potentially worrisome” but not currently cause for alarm, since the cases filed so far generally fit the type of cases previous administrations have pursued.

    CNN’s Hannah Rabinowitz contributed to this report.

  • 美国审查驻欧部队 促北约朝欧洲主导迈进


    2026年6月18日 18:21 / 联合早报

    赫格塞斯星期四(6月18日)在布鲁塞尔的北约国防部长会议上,对北约盟友采取严厉措辞,但也承认许多北约成员国在加强防务方面取得长足进步。(路透社)

    美国战争部长赫格塞斯说,五角大楼会在未来六个月内对驻欧部队进行审查,确保北约“在迅速且不可逆转地朝欧洲主导的方向迈进”。

    法新社报道,赫格塞斯星期四(6月18日)在布鲁塞尔的北约国防部长会议上,发表上述言论。华盛顿此前一直在施压欧洲盟国,为自身安全承担更大责任。

    赫格塞斯表明:“这会是一次真正的审查,目的是确保北约正迅速、不可逆转地朝着欧洲主导的方向迈进,并承担起捍卫欧洲的主要责任。”

    北约领导人会议即将在7月召开,美国正不断加大施压力度,力求确保盟国兑现大幅增加国防开支的承诺。

    赫格塞斯强调,今后华盛顿支付用于覆盖北约组织运营成本的会费将取决于盟国是否达到开支目标。

    美国2026年的北约会费约为7亿9000万美元(约10亿新元),赫格塞斯说:“如果其他盟国不紧急增加军费,我们的会费缴纳额就会相应减少。”

    此外,伊朗战争期间,一些北约国家拒绝为美国对伊朗的军事行动提供便利和协助,此举招致美国总统特朗普不满。

    赫格塞斯说,这次审查也旨在确保美国的“准入、驻军和飞越权得到明确界定和保障”。

    “太可耻了。这些盟友让美国的儿女——我们的儿女——置身于危险之中。没有任何借口能够为此开脱。”

    尽管措辞严厉,赫格塞斯还是承认,许多北约成员国在加强防务方面取得进步。

    “一些盟友已经领会我们的意思并采取行动。你们自己心里清楚,我们对此深表感谢。”

    美国审查驻欧部队 促北约朝欧洲主导迈进

    2026年6月18日 18:21 / 联合早报

    赫格塞斯星期四(6月18日)在布鲁塞尔的北约国防部长会议上,对北约盟友采取严厉措辞,但也承认许多北约成员国在加强防务方面取得长足进步。 (路透社)

    美国战争部长赫格塞斯说,五角大楼会在未来六个月内对驻欧部队进行审查,确保北约“在迅速且不可逆转地朝欧洲主导的方向迈进”。

    法新社报道,赫格塞斯星期四(6月18日)在布鲁塞尔的北约国防部长会议上,发表上述言论。华盛顿此前一直在施压欧洲盟国,为自身安全承担更大责任。

    赫格塞斯表明:“这会是一次真正的审查,目的是确保北约正迅速、不可逆转地朝着欧洲主导的方向迈进,并承担起捍卫欧洲的主要责任。”

    北约领导人会议即将在7月召开,美国正不断加大施压力度,力求确保盟国兑现大幅增加国防开支的承诺。

    赫格塞斯强调,今后华盛顿支付用于覆盖北约组织运营成本的会费将取决于盟国是否达到开支目标。

    美国2026年的北约会费约为7亿9000万美元(约10亿新元),赫格塞斯说:“如果其他盟国不紧急增加军费,我们的会费缴纳额就会相应减少。”

    此外,伊朗战争期间,一些北约国家拒绝为美国对伊朗的军事行动提供便利和协助,此举招致美国总统特朗普不满。

    赫格塞斯说,这次审查也旨在确保美国的“准入、驻军和飞越权得到明确界定和保障”。

    “太可耻了。这些盟友让美国的儿女——我们的儿女——置身于危险之中。没有任何借口能够为此开脱。”

    尽管措辞严厉,赫格塞斯还是承认,许多北约成员国在加强防务方面取得长足进步,并称工作正在取得进展。

    “一些盟友已经领会我们的意思并采取行动。你们自己心里清楚,我们对此深表感谢。”

  • 美联储结束征询意见阶段 美国银行将全力推动资本规则调整


    2026-06-18T10:02:38.408Z / https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/us-banks-make-final-push-capital-rule-changes-fed-wraps-up-consultation-2026-06-18/

    • 银行寻求技术调整,或进一步降低部分新增资本要求
    • 四名行业官员透露,银行业计划对交易活动的资本计提提出异议
    • 大型银行还希望根据2015年以来的经济增长重新校准全球系统重要性银行附加费

    华盛顿6月18日路透电——随着美联储进入美国资本规则全面改革的最后阶段,美国大型银行周四将正式向美联储提出调整其旨在减少银行需预留的潜在损失吸收资金的提案。

    据五名行业高管和员工透露,他们的核心诉求包括削减针对华尔街交易活动的资本计提、取消针对未使用信用卡额度计提资本的要求,并进一步调整以降低针对全球互联互通银行征收的附加费的影响。这些官员因讨论未公开的监管事宜和评论信内容而选择匿名。

    通过《每日案卷》新闻简报获取最新法律资讯,直达您的收件箱,开启您的清晨。点击此处订阅。

    由美联储牵头的美国监管机构于3月公布了全面资本规则的新宽松草案,据估算将使大型银行的损失吸收资本减少约4.8%,并辩称现行规则正在损害经济。这套所谓的“巴塞尔”规则全面改革了银行的风险计量方式,进而调整了其所需持有的资本规模。

    银行业认为,新提案相较于美联储2023年由民主党官员提出的原始计划有了大幅改进,后者在地区银行破产后曾设想实施20%的资本上调。

    但消息人士称,在分析了数百页的拟议技术调整方案后,银行已发现问题,并将进行最后一搏以求修正。

    银行提交正式评论的截止日期为周四。美联储发言人未回应置评请求。

    “大家都在大力推动未来六个月内完成这项工作,因为监管议程上还有其他事项,”专门从事金融监管业务的美迈斯律师事务所合伙人马修·比桑兹说道。

    放宽资本规则的批评者认为,削减银行资本要求会使银行更容易受到风险冲击,若金融机构陷入困境并限制放贷,可能会损害经济。

    上月,“更好市场”组织经济增长与金融稳定主任菲利普·巴泽尔在一份新闻声明中表示,“强劲的资本标准是银行体系韧性的基础”,因为“它们确保当风险显现时,由银行——而非纳税人、员工或小企业——承担损失”。

    交易、信用卡规则调整

    华尔街银行将辩称,监管机构在为交易活动分配资本时过于保守且一刀切,尤其是考虑到美联储每年会通过“压力测试”健康检查来评估各家银行的风险。高管们表示,行业团体将提议修改规则,大幅削减甚至完全取消美联储针对该业务提出的额外资本要求。

    银行业预计还将反对一项要求,即对被称为“无条件可撤销承诺”的10%未使用信贷额度计提资本,其中最常见的就是未使用的信用卡额度。

    目前,这类信贷额度无需计提资本,因为银行可随时撤销,但监管机构辩称,实际上在经济压力时期,出于客户关系或其他风险管理考量,银行可能不会这么做。

    少数几家大型银行还将再次推动降低美联储在2008年金融危机后对全球系统重要性银行(简称GSIB)征收的资本“附加费”。

    美联储提议进行一次性调整,以计入约2019年以来的经济增长,并为未来的增长设置自动更新机制,这将反过来降低银行相对于经济规模的占比以及由此产生的附加费。但消息人士称,银行将再次主张应计入该附加费自2015年设立以来的所有经济增长。

    不会掀起大规模反对

    银行不会像2023年那样强力反对。多名高管表示,银行已经缩减了诉求,聚焦于最关键的问题。

    据一位熟悉该计划的人士透露,一个行业团体已发现该提案存在近100个问题,但计划仅就其中数十个问题进行申辩。

    路透社此前曾报道,负责制定该规则的美联储监管事务副主席米歇尔·鲍曼曾向银行传达,要求它们在反馈时保持审慎。高管们表示,银行业也希望结束这场耗费多年时间和精力的政策争端。

    本文编辑:米歇尔·普莱斯与奥罗拉·埃利斯

    US banks to make final push on capital rule changes as Fed wraps up consultation

    2026-06-18T10:02:38.408Z / https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/us-banks-make-final-push-capital-rule-changes-fed-wraps-up-consultation-2026-06-18/

    • Banks seek technical tweaks that could further reduce some new capital hikes
    • Industry plans to challenge capital charges on trading activities, four industry officials said
    • Largest banks also want GSIB surcharge recalibrated using economic growth since 2015

    WASHINGTON, June 18 (Reuters) – Large U.S. banks on Thursday will formally pitch the central bank on tweaks to a Federal Reserve ​proposal aimed at reducing the funds they must set aside to absorb potential losses, as the central bank enters the last leg of a marathon ‌overhaul of U.S. capital rules.

    Among their top asks will be reductions to capital assigned to Wall Street trading activities, scrapping a requirement to hold capital against unused credit card lines, and further fixes to reduce the impact of a surcharge levied on globally interconnected banks, according to five industry executives and employees. The officials spoke anonymously to discuss ongoing regulatory matters and the contents of comment letters that are not ​yet public.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    U.S. regulators led by the Federal Reserve in March unveiled new relaxed drafts of sweeping capital rules, which they estimated would reduce big banks’ loss-absorbing capital by ​around 4.8%, arguing the current rules are hurting the economy. The so-called ‘Basel’ rules overhaul how banks measure their risk and in turn how much ⁠capital they need.

    Lenders believe the new proposal is a dramatic improvement from the central bank’s original 2023 plan put forward by Democratic officials keen to impose stricter bank rules, ​which had envisaged a 20% capital hike following regional bank failures.

    But after analyzing hundreds of pages of proposed technical changes, lenders have identified issues which they will make one last-ditch push to ​fix, the sources said.

    The deadline for banks to submit formal comments is Thursday. A Fed spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.

    “There’s a really big push to get it wrapped up in the next six months because there are other items on the regulatory agenda,” said Matthew Bisanz, a partner at Mayer Brown who specializes in financial regulation.

    Critics of the easier rules argue that trimming bank capital requirements ​makes the firms more vulnerable to risks, and could hurt the economy should financial firms falter and restrict lending.

    Last month, Phillip Basil, director of Economic Growth and Financial Stability ​for Better Markets, said in a press statement “strong capital standards are the foundation” of a resilient banking system, because “they ensure that banks—not taxpayers, workers, or small businesses—absorb losses when risks materialize.”

    TRADING, CREDIT CARD CHANGES

    Wall ‌Street banks ⁠will argue that regulators have been too conservative and blunt in assigning capital to trading activities, especially since the Fed annually gauges individual banks’ risks with its “stress test” health checks. Industry groups will suggest changes that could dramatically shrink or even erase the additional capital the Fed has proposed for that business, executives said.

    The banking industry is also expected to push back against a requirement to effectively hold capital against 10% of unused credit lines known as “unconditionally cancelable commitments,” the most common of which is unused credit card lines.

    Currently, such credit lines are ​capital-free because banks can yank them at any ​time, but regulators argue that in ⁠practice lenders may not do that during times of economic stress due to client relationships or other risk management practices.

    A handful of the biggest banks will also make another push to soften the capital “surcharge” the Fed imposed on global systemically important banks in the U.S., or “GSIB,” ​following the 2008 financial crisis.

    The Fed proposed a one-time adjustment to account for economic growth dating back to roughly 2019, as well ​as automatic updates for ⁠future growth, which would in turn reduce banks’ size relative to the economy and the resulting surcharge. But lenders will again argue it should account for growth since its creation in 2015, the people said.

    NO MAJOR CHALLENGE

    Banks do not plan to push back hard the way they did in 2023. Multiple executives said banks have pared back their asks, focusing on the most significant ⁠issues.

    One industry group ​identified nearly 100 issues with the proposal but plans to make the case for only a few dozen, ​according to one of the people who is familiar with the plan.

    Reuters had previously reported that Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman, who is leading the rulewriting effort, had conveyed to banks they should be measured in ​their feedback, and executives said the industry is keen to move on from a policy fight that has sucked up years of time and energy.

    Editing by Michelle Price and Aurora Ellis

湘ICP备2026001899号-2