When will Trump let Republican hopefuls make moves to succeed him?

2026-06-20T16:00:26.071Z / CNN

• President Donald Trump has not yet endorsed Vice President JD Vance as his successor for 2028.
• Secretary of State Marco Rubio has emerged as a potential rival, with some Republicans supporting him.
• Trump’s reluctance to anoint an heir keeps potential candidates waiting and the Republican primary timeline uncertain.

AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.

A version of this story appeared in CNN’s What Matters newsletter. To get it in your inbox, sign up for free here.

We recently assessed the large field of Democrats who could run for president in 2028 and are already making moves in that direction.

So it’s a good time to see what’s happening on the Republican side of things. What we know is that the next president won’t be Donald Trump.

The president, not yet to the halfway mark of his second term, has said he won’t try to test the Constitution’s ban on his running for a third term. But he also won’t want to pass the torch any time soon. While the conventional wisdom is that Vice President JD Vance will step in to be Trump’s heir, Trump has made his career by shattering conventional wisdom. There are plenty of other Republicans out there who would like to be president, including Trump’s ambitious Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

I spoke with Steve Contorno, a CNN senior reporter who covers Republicans, to get his sense for when and how a Republican race could get underway.

Our conversation, edited for length, is below.

WOLF: Trump has remade the Republican Party in his image. He says that he will abide by the Constitution and not try to run or keep power for a third term. What is the current thinking about how Republicans might replace him?

CONTORNO:That conversation has to begin with the vice president. When you go to conservative events — Turning Point USA events, Trump rallies, CPAC — and talk to the grassroots, there’s a deference to him. You see that in the polling and the CPAC straw poll, and other sort of indicators.

When Trump was picking his running mate, his team was saying that he was doing so looking for someone who could carry the torch from him.

Trump, though, never really said that overtly, and he’s been very coy about who he wants to succeed him, both publicly and privately. That has led people to wonder whether Trump wants to consider Vance his heir. That has left the door open for people who remain firmly fans of Marco Rubio to fantasize about him.

WOLF: Trump talks about these two and he likes to frame it as an either-or or suggest they could be a team. Is there a rivalry building?

CONTORNO:Everything we’ve heard is that they get along great, and Rubio in public has been very deferential to the vice president. But there are certainly a lot of people in Trump’s orbit and in the Republican Party who remain fans of Rubio. There are people who wanted to see him be the vice president over Vance, who are giddy at the thought that he could ultimately be the person who steps in here.

It’s hard to know how much the hemming and hawing from Trump is authentic, how much of it is his tendency to play his own people off each other, and how much of it is his hesitance to anoint his successor, knowing that it will start the conversations about the post Trump presidency.

He’s very much in his presidency, and he doesn’t want to be considered a lame duck, and one of the ways to protect that is to keep the future and the future Republican Party as cloudy as possible.

WOLF: Vance would have to run from within the Trump administration. Rubio couldn’t be a political candidate as secretary of state. So is the thinking that Rubio will leave the administration at some point?

CONTORNO: I don’t think we’ve seen any indication that he would leave, and given his statements about supporting Vance if he chooses to run, I would not expect Rubio to step down to challenge Vance now. If Vance decides not to run for whatever reason — because he doesn’t feel like he has Trump’s support, because he has a very young family that is going to be growing in the next year, because he doesn’t want to do the job — then perhaps you would see Rubio make some movements. But there would have to be an extraordinary change of circumstances in the relationship between the vice president and the secretary of state, or a significant change in Trump’s posture toward those two men, for Rubio to take such a significant step.

The other thing about Rubio is he’s been in public office for most of his adult life. It has long been known in some circles that he would like to work in the private sector at some point to build some wealth for his family. If the presidency is on the table, perhaps the calculus changes.

WOLF: Rubio is interesting. You said there are people that are kind of giddy for the focus to shift to him. He’s arguably done more with his job inside the Trump administration than anyone else in the cabinet. Is that why people are interested in him?

CONTORNO: There’s this perception that he has handled everything Trump has thrown at him with both professionalism and grace, without angering or embarrassing Trump.

There are a lot of people who were in Trump’s orbit who are from Florida, and a lot of those people were fans of Rubio’s. The donor base likes Rubio a lot. When Trump was trying to choose a running mate, they were among the most vocal in pushing for Rubio, so there’s always been that contingency of Rubio backers.

People who are really plugged in and watching the Trump administration every single day on Fox News like it’s a reality TV show, and are on social media or whatever — they love Rubio, they see him as hyper-competent. Even young people, who are among the people who are most dissatisfied with Trump because of his foreign policy moves, are among the people who I find most enthusiastic about Rubio, which is somewhat counterintuitive.

WOLF: Totally ironic.

CONTORNO:Yeah, because he is in many ways the architect, or at least the enforcer, of this foreign policy. And they’re somewhat skeptical of Vance, because of his past statements about Trump, because of his ties to big tech. Even though Vance is supposedly the isolationist in Trump’s circle, it doesn’t mean he’s won over the people who are most interested in avoiding foreign conflicts.

WOLF: Vance has a new book out about his conversion to Catholicism, and the White House has inserted him into the end-of-war negotiations. What have we learned about him over the past week?

CONTORNO:The timing of the book launch is pretty remarkable, and in some ways this week marked the unofficial kickoff of the 2028 GOP presidential primary. Vance not only launched a promotional tour for his book that landed him on “The View” — hostile territory for most Republicans, but also a familiar stop for ambitious politicians — and forced him to navigate questions about his political future, but he also stepped out as the face of the administration’s deal with Iran. That agreement has sharply divided Republicans and it seems it has the potential to become a significant fault line in a GOP primary. Already we’ve seen Texas Sen. Ted Cruz step out to criticize the pact in deeply unflattering terms — with Vance allies in Trump world responding quickly to clap back at Cruz and his well-known presidential ambitions.

WOLF: It’s only four sitting vice presidents in history who have become president. It would be kind of an anomaly for Vance to succeed Trump. Are they cognizant of that in the administration? Or would the party coalesce around him if Trump endorsed him?

CONTORNO:I think you would certainly see the party coalesce around him. There are so many people who take Trump’s word above all else, and you’re already starting to see some organizations start maneuvering for Vance. Turning Point USA, for example, has already endorsed him. They have not only the platform that was created by Charlie Kirk, but also infrastructure, an organization that has been on the ground in a lot of swing states.

There are others who are eager to jump in on those efforts, but no one wants to step too much out in front of Trump. I think that’s why you’re not seeing other candidates play footsie with the idea of running in 2028 even though we know there are folks who still harbor presidential ambitions in the party — Cruz and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, among others.

There’s not been a ton of activity in Iowa and New Hampshire on the Republican side because of the fear of crossing Trump. But that has also been a challenge for Vance as well, because as much as there are people who assume he would be the heir, he can’t be seen as positioning himself for succeeding Trump before Trump is ready.

WOLF:And from Trump’s perspective, if you’re going to style your presidencies as a reality TV show, picking an heir and simply getting behind that person wouldn’t make for very good ratings.

CONTORNO: Vance has joked about this as well. He had a comment where he quipped that he and Marco are playing in the latest iteration of “The Apprentice.” That’s a joke, but there’s a lot of truth in it. The fact that Vance said it means that they’re all sort of cognizant of Trump’s preference for drama and to keep people in suspense.

WOLF: There’s the 2026 election coming up, and that will reframe a lot of the political conversation, depending on whether Republicans lose the House or the Senate and how that affects Trump’s final two years in office. What is the conventional wisdom about when we could see people start to announce campaigns?

CONTORNO:If you look back in previous cycles, that winter right after the midterms, you start seeing people jump in. It remains to be seen whether anyone dares to launch a campaign, whether formally or informally, that soon. Running for president takes so much time, and if anyone does think they have a legitimate chance of challenging Vance, they’re going to have to start building a following in either Iowa or New Hampshire very quickly after November. So if Trump holds out from endorsing Vance, which is a real possibility, you might start seeing some of these candidates test the waters, knowing that, hey, if there’s an opening because the president isn’t sold on Vance, then we need to start building up that base of support and our financial coffers sooner than later.

For Vance, how long can you wait? How long are you going to sit around and hope that the president gives you the endorsement that was all but promised when you took this job — before you have to just say, “I’m running, whether the president is ready to back me or not”?

It is such a conundrum for these hopefuls and for Vance, because so much of it does rest on Trump’s timing, which I think is why you can kind of throw out the conventional wisdom playbook. They’re all going to be waiting and watching what the president does.

WOLF: Is there space for an anti-Trump or a Trump-fatigue Republican who wants to capitalize on the idea that he is not a popular president and moving Republicans beyond him?

CONTORNO: You’ve seen Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul already suggest he’s considering it, and he would certainly claim that Trump has not governed as a Republican or a conservative, and therefore there needs to be someone in the party who is going to speak to that.

I think you’re going to see people try to make the case that they could be a more effective version of Trump. You saw DeSantis try to do that in 2024, and he’s down in Florida building up his resume, just in case there’s an opening in that lane. Whether there’s a Nikki Haley (former US ambassador to the UN and governor of South Carolina) who wants to try once again to run from the establishment wing, or a fresh voice like Gov. Spencer Cox in Utah, who is trying to bring back a more — I don’t say moderate, but collegial — approach to governing on the right.

In recent primaries, Trump-backed candidates have been so successful that it is going to give any of those people pause in believing they can convince caucusgoers in a deeply conservative pro-Trump state like Iowa — or in New Hampshire, which he has won repeatedly, even when the rest of the party wasn’t ready to embrace him. That’s going to be a real challenge.

WOLF:What are the 2028 markers you’re looking for? What would signal that Vance is either in or out, or Rubio is in or out, or DeSantis is making moves?

CONTORNO: Vance has a book out (it was released on Tuesday), and typically a book is a pretty clear signal that you have some presidential ambitions. That will be closely watched for what’s in that book, and how it’s received, and how he promotes it. It’ll be a little mini test drive for him to get a sense of how the country is feeling about him separate from the president.

Otherwise I’ve talked to people in New Hampshire who have said the unspoken rule right now is don’t come here because you’re going to anger Trump. The Iowa State Fair that’s coming up should traditionally draw a lot of people who are interested in running, and I don’t know if you’re going to see that kind of turnout. Or maybe you get a bunch of people coming to campaign in some of these congressional seats in Iowa that are going to be real battlegrounds. Maybe that’ll be an excuse for Cruz to get back to Iowa and try to put the band back together there.

The midterms are going to be a real indicator of whether you’re going to get a traditional starting line. If the Republicans under Trump pull it off and hold on to the House, then all bets are off, because it’ll be very clear that Trump will remain fully in command of the timeline and the party going forward.

WOLF:Campaigns are very much about money. Are there any indications in the money race?

CONTORNO:There’ll be a lot of hesitance to donate against JD Vance. Even the people in the party who don’t necessarily like Trump and were looking for an alternative in 2024, either in DeSantis or Haley, a lot of those people do like Vance. He has a lot of connections to the fundraising center of the party, and so you’re not going to want to anger both the sitting president and the potential future president by throwing $20 million at Ted Cruz or whoever. Unless you were really, really sure that Vance wasn’t going to get Trump’s support and wasn’t going to be the guy. Any Republican going out there right now trying to fundraise as the JD Vance alternative is going to get crickets in their inbox from the big donor structure.

Biden scores temporary court victory as Trump appointed judge delays release of Hur investigation materials

2026-06-20T13:47:20-04:00 / Fox News

The Heritage Foundation has spent more than two years seeking the recordings through FOIA requests

By Elaine Mallon Fox News

Published June 20, 2026 1:47pm EDT

New audio reveals Biden struggled to recall key moments in his life

Newly released audio from President Biden’s interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur reveals him struggling to recall key dates in his life—highlighting significant memory lapses.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/d3eb69b7-06ce-45ab-aa7f-aa40a850148d

Listen to this article

4 min

Former President Joe Biden has won another three weeks to block the release of audio recordings and transcripts tied to Special Counsel Robert Hur’s classified documents investigation, after a federal judge granted a temporary injunction while a federal appeals court reviews his challenge.

The recordings stem from Biden’s interviews with Mark Zwonitzer, the ghostwriter of his 2017 memoir, “Promise Me, Dad.” U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich, a Trump-appointee, on Friday issued an injunction pending appeal that prevents the Justice Department from releasing the materials while the D.C. Circuit considers the case. The order came just hours after Friedrich denied Biden’s request for a preliminary injunction that would have stopped the release altogether.

The legal battle could determine whether Americans ever hear the recordings that helped shape Hur’s decision not to prosecute Biden over his handling of classified documents. The audio has been the subject of intense scrutiny because Hur raised questions about Biden’s memory in explaining why he declined to bring charges against Biden for mishandling classified documents.

Although the Justice Department previously released audio from Biden’s interviews with Hur, the recordings at the center of the current legal battle involve separate conversations between Biden and Zwonitzer.

Hur’s 2024 report repeatedly referenced Biden’s recorded conversations with Zwonitzer. The special counsel described some exchanges as “painfully slow” and said Biden at times struggled to recall events and relay information, observations that fueled scrutiny of the then-president’s cognitive abilities amid an election year.

Former President Joe Biden speaks to a crowd during a fundraising event with the South Carolina Democratic Party at the Columbia Museum of Art on Feb. 27, 2026 in Columbia, S.C.(Sean Rayford/Getty Images)

GREGG JARRETT: RELEASE THE BIDEN TAPES AND LET AMERICANS HEAR THE TRUTH FOR THEMSELVES

The Heritage Foundation and its Oversight Project director Mike Howell have spent more than two years seeking the recordings and transcripts through FOIA requests.

Heritage Foundation officials have argued that the public has a strong interest in reviewing the materials referenced throughout Hur’s report, particularly because the special counsel relied on the recordings in explaining his decision not to pursue criminal charges

Biden has been fighting to keep the potentially embarrassing recordings under wraps.

CNN HOST SUGGESTS ROBERT HUR ‘UNDERSOLD’ EXTENT OF BIDEN MEMORY LAPSES DURING SPECIAL COUNSEL INTERVIEW

After Friedrich denied Biden’s motion for a preliminary injunction on Friday, Biden’s legal team immediately sought emergency relief to preserve the status quo while appealing the decision.

In an emergency filing, Biden’s attorneys argued that disclosure would effectively end the case before appellate judges could review the legal questions involved. They maintained that once the recordings are released, any privacy protections would be permanently lost and the appeal would become largely moot.

Former special counsel Robert K. Hur testifies before the House Judiciary Committee in Washington, D.C., on March 12, 2024. Hur investigated President Joe Biden’s handling of classified documents and published a report with conclusions about Biden’s memory.(Win McNamee/Getty Images)

The filing also stressed that the FOIA litigation has already been pending for more than two years and argued there was no urgent public need requiring immediate disclosure of conversations that occurred roughly a decade ago between Biden and his ghostwriter. Biden’s attorneys noted that the former president is now a private citizen who neither holds nor is seeking public office.

OBAMA-APPOINTED JUDGE WITH TIES TO ANTI-TRUMP CONSPIRACY THEORY HIT WITH MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT

The Justice Department initially withheld the recordings and much of the transcript material under several FOIA exemptions. Earlier this year, however, the department reversed course and determined the records could be released with redactions after concluding that significant public interest existed in understanding evidence relied upon by Hur during his investigation.

After the Justice Department announced plans to release the recordings, Biden filed suit in May to stop the disclosure, claiming the audiotapes contain private conversations that should remain protected from public release and if released, would be in violation of the Privacy Act.

President Joe Biden speaks during an official transition event to thank Ron Klain for his work and to welcome his successor Jeff Zients.(REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)

His legal team argued that the department’s decision violates the Privacy Act and constitutes arbitrary agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Leading Biden’s legal effort is Amy Jeffress, a partner at Washington-based law firm Hecker Fink and a former Justice Department national security official. Jeffress has served as the primary attorney advancing Biden’s challenge to the release of the materials and signed the recent emergency filing seeking to prevent disclosure while the appeal proceeds.

Jeffress has also drawn attention because she is married to U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, an Obama appointee who recently ruled against the Trump administration in a high-profile dispute involving the Kennedy Center. Cooper’s ruling prompted criticism from some Trump allies and conservative commentators who pointed to the judge’s family connection to Biden’s attorney, suggesting a conflict of interest may be at play in Cooper’s work.

Elaine Mallon is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business covering national politics.

From New York to Seattle to DC, more cities are picking democratic socialist leaders

2026-06-20T16:16:36.563Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/20/politics/democratic-socialist-mayors-washington-dc-seattle-new-york

• Democratic socialist Janeese Lewis George won the Democratic primary for mayor of Washington, DC, marking the latest electoral success for candidates aligned with the Democratic Socialists of America.
• The victories extend beyond DC, with democratic socialists winning mayoral races in New York City and Seattle and advancing in Los Angeles.
• Moderate Democrats caution that the far left’s successes are limited to the bluest parts of the country and don’t reflect where the broader party stands.

AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.

On the night of the Democratic primary to be the next mayor of Washington, DC, Janeese Lewis George pushed back on those who doubted the movement that had formed behind her.

Despite speculation that she was primarily drawing support from wealthier, White residents and DC transplants, election results showed that Lewis George, who is Black, won wide support across the district.

“Over the past year, we assembled the most diverse coalition in this city’s history,” Lewis George said, describing a base that included organizers, environmentalists, nurses, transit and federal workers and janitors.

“We are Democrats, independents,” she said. “And democratic socialists.”

Lewis George’s victory in the nation’s capital — after 12 years of the more business-friendly administration of Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser — marks the latest electoral success for candidates aligned with the Democratic Socialists of America and the far left, running broadly on addressing affordability issues like housing and childcare.

Last November, Zohran Mamdani of New York City and Katie Wilson of Seattle won mayoral elections in their cities. Earlier this month, Los Angeles city councilmember Nithya Raman, also a DSA member, advanced to the general election in her city’s mayoral race, despite efforts by incumbent Mayor Karen Bass to elevate a Republican rival, former reality show star Spencer Pratt.

Mamdani is trying to extend his influence in New York City by backing democratic socialists in two US House primaries on Tuesday, including a high-profile test between Rep. Adriano Espaillat and the mayor’s endorsed candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier.

Rallying with his slate of primary candidates on Thursday, Mamdani ripped the Democratic Party as stuck in an “old way of thinking” that would lose future elections.

“Frankly, it will lose in South Carolina and New Hampshire,” he said, referencing traditional early presidential primary states. “It will fall short of 270 electoral votes, because the party of the past will not be what leads us into the future.”

Aparna Raj, a democratic socialist who is currently leading her primary for a council seat in Northwest Washington, argued Democrats must offer a forward-looking message.

“If we are going to provide a positive vision, and a positive alternative, in comparison to Trump and authoritarianism, we have to actually provide a positive thing for people to vote for,” she said. “And that is people seeing that elected officials care about working people.”

But moderate Democrats caution against reading too much into the DSA’s wins, arguing that the far left’s successes are limited to the bluest parts of the country and their policies don’t resonate in Republican-leaning or swing districts.

“It is certainly true that they’ve had some success in these very, very blue areas, but that is not indicative of where the broader party is in the rest of the country,” said Matt Bennett, the executive vice president for public affairs at Third Way, a center-left think tank. “The danger for Democrats is that the party massively over-interprets what is happening in these races.”

The growth in democratic socialists’ influence comes as Democrats are grappling with what kind of leaders are more electable and what messages will resonate most with voters beyond vowing to oppose President Donald Trump. Other heavily Democratic cities have taken different approaches.

In San Francisco, voters rejected both the moderate incumbent, London Breed, and the race’s prominent progressive standard-bearer, Aaron Peskin, in 2024, pivoting instead to Daniel Lurie, a Levi Strauss heir and philanthropic executive who ran as a political outsider. Lurie has drawn bipartisan praise amid his focus on street conditions, public safety and government efficiency.

But in Chicago, Mayor Brandon Johnson, who isn’t a democratic socialist but was celebrated by organizers when he was elected in 2023, has faced a protracted budget battle and bitter fights with the city council over property taxes. Lawsuits and staffing chaos at the Chicago school board, paired with simmering disputes between the teachers and service employees’ unions, have eroded key bases of support.

In New York, democratic socialists are seeking to push back on the idea that their success is limited.

“DSA’s electoral theory of change is really about starting from building the bench at the lowest levels of office,” Ashik Siddique, the DSA’s national political committee co-chair, told CNN.

Siddique pointed to the rise of leaders like Lewis George, who was first elected to DC’s council in 2020, and Mamdani, who was first elected to the New York state assembly the same year.

In the 7th District, where Rep. Nydia Velázquez announced she won’t seek re-election, Mamdani is backing state assemblymember and democratic socialist Claire Valdez against Brooklyn borough president Antonio Reynoso, who was endorsed by the incumbent.

And in the 10th District, he’s also backing former city comptroller Brad Lander, a progressive and primary rival-turned-ally, against incumbent Rep. Daniel Goldman.

Gustavo Gordillo, the co-chair of the New York City DSA, said the results of the June 23 primaries will serve as a proof point for members of the political establishment who aren’t sure if Mamdani’s win was a fluke.

“They’re paying attention closely to see, ‘How seriously do we have to take these people?’” he said. “We think that our performance this election cycle will help decide those questions.”

There’s already evidence that Mamdani’s rise has built up the party locally. The New York City DSA chapter grew from 5,900 members when it endorsed Mamdani to 14,000 members today, Gordillo said.

While the DC Democratic primary for mayor was a contest between the progressive-left and a more centrist candidate, former at-large councilmember Kenyan McDuffie, the elections in New York’s 7th and 13th Districts are between the “left and further left,” said Reynoso.

He and Velázquez were early supporters of Mamdani. Reynoso’s political base, which includes the progressive Working Families Party, was part of the movement that backed Mamdani last year.

“The coalition to get him elected was very broad and expansive. It had to be to take down the establishment, and we were all a part of that,” Reynoso told CNN. “We’re family in here, so we’re just a brother and a sister fighting for community.”

For the democratic socialists who’ve been elected to office, their administrations have had to navigate the realities of governing as they try to implement their campaign promises.

Wilson, a self-described democratic socialist, ousted moderate incumbent Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell in November 2025. Encouraging Mamdani comparisons, Wilson positioned herself against Harrell’s more punitive approach to public safety and encampment sweeps.

Since taking office, however, Wilson now finds herself directing a crackdown on an open-air drug market in a high-profile Seattle intersection, amid pushback to leniency policies.

“While increased police presence is one part of this new approach, we know we can’t arrest our way out of these problems,” Wilson wrote in a statement this week.

In New York City, Mamdani has made some progress on his agenda, including a $1.2 billion state investment in early childhood education, while other campaign promises like making public buses free have stalled. As he marked his first 100 days in office in April, Mamdani doubled down on his democratic socialist politics.

“I know there are many who use ‘socialist’ as a dirty word, something to be ashamed of,” Mamdani said. “They can try all they want, but we will not be ashamed of using government to fight for the many, not simply the few.”

Lewis George, who is expected to face minimal opposition in the November general election, has vowed to lower utility bills, build tens of thousands of new affordable housing units and implement universal affordable childcare.

And she has said she would take on a more combative approach against the Trump administration than the current mayoral administration to protect DC’s autonomy. But that, too, will require a balancing act that will only become apparent in office. Ahead of Tuesday’s election, the president threatened a federal takeover of the district if Lewis George won.

“We are not going to be able to stand up for our autonomy and fight for DC statehood, ultimately, by just complying in advance,” Lewis George said during a press conference Thursday. “I’ve also been very clear that I will work with anyone, including the president, for the best interests of DC residents.”

丹戎巴葛时隔多年再现“武林大会” 会馆团体招生居民同欢

2026年6月20日 23:19 / 联合早报

各参与舞狮武馆有15分钟的擂台表演时间，图为冈州会馆的舞狮武术演出。 （周国威摄）

外家拳、太极拳、南狮、海南狮、金狮及粉色女龙……六家龙狮或武术团体成员在达士敦坪公园设擂台各展身手，希望借此招收新人并传承武术文化。现场气氛热闹非凡，吸引周围的组屋居民，他们有的从窗户探头眺望，有的下楼一同欣赏表演。

首届“达士敦文化节”共售出400张门票，现场吸引许多公众围观。（周国威摄）

首届“达士敦文化节”星期六（6月20日）下午举行，来自新加坡精武体育会、新加坡鹤山会馆武术醒狮团、冈州会馆、禅山六合体育会、光武国术团和文忠居民委员会龙狮团的代表齐聚达士敦坪公园（Duxton Plain Park）。参与的成员涵盖男女老幼，更不乏跨国籍和跨种族的面孔，展现传统文化的多元包容性。

参与活动的舞狮流派各有特色，图为禅山六合体育会七彩狮被的舞狮。（周国威摄）

一开场，不同流派的舞狮随着振奋人心的锣鼓声入场，仿佛在为各自的参与会馆和团体助阵。一眼望去，舞狮狮头各有特色：有披着七彩狮被的禅山六合体育会舞狮、精武体育会独具一格的“金狮”等。

新加坡鹤山会馆武术醒狮团团长庄英申受访时说，鹤山舞狮注重鼓声情感与节奏，以及舞狮的形态，即通过舞步表达狮子的喜怒哀乐。（周国威摄）

结合南北流派特色金狮 重现当年风采

舞狮可分南狮和北狮两大传统流派，本地多数采用南狮，也称“醒狮”，寓意为吉祥如意、驱邪避害、兴旺发达。“金狮”则属北狮，经精武元老一番改造后，狮头镀上闪亮的金纸，并改用竹材“减重”。

精武体育会司理陈清发受访时说，精武体育会的特色包括金狮和外家拳（或北拳）。他在1974年加入精武体育会，记得当时每晚都会有至少50名会员聚集在达士敦坪公园练武，耍拳、翻跟斗。

“我们当时挺受欢迎的，特别是电影《精武门》上映时，更是吸引一批民众报名参加。现在招新人的情况已大不相同，很多家长希望孩子专注学业，让我们更难招到小朋友加入。”

令人鼓舞的是，精武体育会仍有一批年轻会员，10岁的郭铠华是其中一人。

郭铠华在2019年偶然观看了一段舞狮影片后深受吸引，甚至将家里的水桶倒扣过来当作锣鼓敲击，不久后便加入精武体育会。

他受访时说，他正在学习棍法和舞狮，也包括担任狮头和鼓手。“虽然担心练武时会受伤，但我对舞狮的兴趣战胜了恐惧，所以会一直坚持下去不放弃。”

吴睿颖（前排）和父亲吴伟廉（不在图中）、大姐吴睿恩（后排左起）、母亲宋彬彬、二姐吴睿涵，一家五口一起参加光武国术团。（周国威摄）

郭铠华不是现场最年轻的，5岁的吴睿颖和父母及两名姐姐全家齐上阵加入了光武国术团。

父亲吴伟廉（48岁，公司董事）说，一家人四年前入会是希望强身健体，也让家中的四个女子学武防身。

母亲宋彬彬（45岁，销售经理）则说，一家人还有机会随团到中国海南岛表演，与当地武馆会员交流。“原来单在海南岛就分有几个武术派系，让我大开眼界。”

母女三人挥舞粉色女龙展现巾帼矫健身姿

24岁学生司徒宇恩也与妹妹及母亲一起加入文忠居民委员会龙狮团，母女三人都是女子舞龙团的成员。在她们默契的配合和有力挥舞下，粉色龙身在空中蜿蜒翻飞，矫健身姿令现场观众惊叹连连。

司徒宇恩（左一）与妹妹司徒宇容（左三）和母亲余春香（后排右二）是文忠居民委员会龙狮团的女子舞龙团成员。（周国威摄）

司徒宇恩告诉记者，她自去年9月加入龙狮团以来，已参与几次表演，但最大的收获是结识这群团友。“我在学校较少接触不同年龄层和背景的朋友，与大家建立的友谊，我觉得很宝贵。”

丹戎巴葛集选区议员符策翔受访时说，这一区有许多华人会馆和武馆，且每个都历史悠久。“不过，仍有一些居民不知道这些武馆原来近在咫尺。因此，我希望这场活动能让居民接触这些文化，多参与他们的活动。”

他说，建国总理李光耀年少时，曾在达士敦坪公园观看武馆训练，这也是达士敦文化节在这个地点举行的意义。

负面事件缠身形象受创 武汉大学纪委书记由中纪委干将空降引议论

2026年6月20日 23:32 / 联合早报

中国名校武汉大学因数起争议事件重创形象后，中纪委干将王晗空降担任武大党委副书记、纪委书记、国家监委驻武大监察专员。图为他在中国官方2016年制作的反腐专题片中露面，披露高官落马细节。 （YouTube频道“CCTV记录”截图）

中国名校武汉大学因数起争议事件重创形象后，中共中央纪委干将王晗被空降担任武大中共党委副书记、纪委书记、国家监委驻武大监察专员。

分析认为，武大此番人事调整并未脱离中管高校纪检监察体制改革后的大框架；高校处于舆论风口浪尖虽会引起高层关注，但人事变动可能与具体的公共事件并无直接关联。

武大官网星期二（6月16日）发文称，学校在星期一（15日）开会宣布这项领导班子调整决定。武大中共党委书记朱孔军说，调整是上级部门通盘考虑、审慎研究决定的，“学校党委完全拥护、坚决服从”。他同时强调，要牢牢把握社会主义办学方向，加快建设“红色武大”。

这则消息星期六（20日）被中国媒体大量转发后冲上网络热搜。武大过去一年里深陷多起引爆舆论的争议事件，加上王晗身为中纪委反腐干将的背景，让这项任命引起众多议论。

从“永远的校长”刘道玉主政时提倡的自由民主学风，到校园内每年春季樱花盛开吸引满满人潮，武大长期是中国名校中备受关注的网红高校。但去年下半年以来，武大接连因图书馆性骚扰案、开学典礼座椅被指像日本国旗等事件，卷入性别对立与政治情绪洪流，遭中国网民非议至今，被指“意识形态出问题”。

外界指摘下，武大“一把手”已在去年9月换人，由主编过《高校意识形态工作研究》一书的朱孔军接任。有声音认为，王晗此次履新武大也是为了整治各种“乱象”。

公开简历显示，王晗此前在中纪委纪检监察室工作多年，这是以监督办案为主责的最前线反腐部门。2016年，他曾在中国官方制作的反腐专题片中露面，披露高官落马细节。

王晗还长期从事对中共宣传系统的纪检监察工作，2022年3月起任中纪委国家监委驻中央宣传部纪检监察组副组长（副局长级），直至此番南下履新。

包括武大在内，中国目前有31所中共党委书记和校长列入中央管理的重点高校。在这些中管高校中，武大此次开会“宣布中央组织部、中央纪委国家监委关于学校领导班子调整的有关决定”，并公开对外发布消息，以及由没有教育系统背景的中纪委干部空降出任学校纪委书记，均较为罕见。

根据《联合早报》梳理，中管高校的纪委书记，大多由同省市教育或纪检系统官员担任，王晗是目前24所北京以外中管高校纪委书记中，唯一出身中纪委的。此外仅少数高校会发新闻稿官宣这一职务调整，且都以“上级决定”来简短说明。

美国智库亚洲协会政策研究所中国分析中心研究助理王晟宇向本报分析，这些变化显示“中央纪委国家监委可能对武汉大学内部治理有一些想法”。“但大趋势上，这也是纪检监察机关所谓‘深化改革’的体现，近年来中管企业和高校的纪委书记也由中组部直接任命，加强了对这些机构的纪律监督。”

中国在2019年将中管高校纪委书记的任命权限提到中央一层，时任武汉大学纪委书记万清祥成为中国首名由中纪委同意任命的高校纪委书记。万清祥在去年底年满60岁，如今由王晗接任。

2022年，中国官方也印发文件，明确中纪委国家监委加强对中管高校纪检监察工作的统筹领导，中管高校纪委书记担任国家监委派驻监察专员，设立监察专员办公室，与学校纪委合署办公。中共政治局常委、中纪委书记李希上任后在2023年的首次外出调研，便到武汉大学调研高校纪检监察体制改革等情况。

在此背景下，王晟宇认为，武大这次人事变动很可能与此前发生的公共事件无直接关联：“公众可能会错意了，武大是标杆，而非黑典型。”

北京分析人士则指出，当高校出现问题时，是需要一些领导班子的调整才能让外界看到改革的信心，“高校总是处在风口浪尖上，对中共形象并没有好处”；如今高校领导班子调整在中组部和中纪委的双重管控下进行，等于是加强了管理，也意味着对高校的腐败问题今后会查得更严。

中国去年有逾40名省管及以上高校领导干部被查，涉及北京大学、中南大学等多所知名高校。高校已成为近年重点反腐领域之一。

杨佳敏冯盛均喜结连理 我国体坛名将齐聚祝贺

2026年6月20日 23:55 / 联合早报

我国羽将杨佳敏（左）和退役泳手冯盛均在星期六完成人生大事。 （陈芷馨摄）

新加坡羽毛球头号女单杨佳敏与退役泳将冯盛均星期六（6月20日）在卫理公会活盼堂（Living Hope Methodist Church）完成人生大事，携手步入人生新阶段。

冯盛均在致辞时分享，两人的缘分始于2020年。当时他通过社交媒体Instagram主动联系杨佳敏，请教训练相关问题，没想到这则讯息最终促成了一段美好姻缘。

杨佳敏则透露，冯盛均是她人生中的第一任男朋友，如今也将成为陪伴自己一生的伴侣。对于即将展开的婚姻生活，她充满期待。

27岁的杨佳敏与34岁的冯盛均星期六上午在教堂举行结婚宣誓仪式，婚宴则将在星期天（21日）举行。出席教堂婚礼的除了双方亲友，也包括多名新加坡国家羽毛球队成员、射击手睿娜、前田径选手叶劲维与陈宗洋，以及现役泳将柯正文等体坛好友。

值得一提的是，印度尼西亚羽毛球女单玛丽斯卡（Gregoria Mariska Tunjung）也专程飞抵新加坡见证好友的大喜之日。两人因长期征战国际赛场而结下深厚友谊，玛丽斯卡此次远道而来出席婚礼，也展现两人间的真挚情谊。

Trump’s new Iran deal faces nuclear blind spot over uranium stockpile, experts warn

June 20, 2026 8:00am EDT / Fox News

Nuclear blind spot could make or break Trump’s new Iran deal, experts warn

The signed deal opened a 60-day negotiating window to nail down the details of the plan

By Alec Schemmel, Fox News

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6398842139112

Rep. Rich McCormick ‘worried’ by Iran deal: ‘I don’t trust them at all’

Rep. Rich McCormick, a Georgia Republican, weighs in on the evolving Iran nuclear talks, reiterating his strong distrust for the Iranian regime. He supports President Trump’s position, labeling the deal an “unconditional surrender” and highlighting concerns that billions in unfrozen assets could empower Iran’s military. McCormick emphasizes the regime’s history of hostility and calls for its change.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump’s new Iran framework is drawing warnings from nuclear experts who say the deal could leave Tehran too much control over its uranium stockpile unless inspectors first locate, secure and verify the material.

The concern centers on language in the reported U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding (MOU) saying the two sides will resolve the fate of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile through a still-to-be-negotiated process. The MOU identifies on-site “downblending,” which means diluting enriched uranium so it is less usable for a nuclear weapon, under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) supervision as the minimum acceptable method for dealing with the material.

The MOU does not explicitly say Iran will retain a civilian nuclear program, but it says the two sides will discuss enrichment and other matters related to Iran’s “nuclear needs” in a final deal.

“Unfettered verification is everything,” Chuck DeVore, Chief National Initiatives Officer at the Texas Public Policy Foundation, told Fox News Digital. “There can be no denial for teams to inspect on the ground. Remote, technological means can achieve a lot, but nothing beats in-person inspections.”

TRUMP NUCLEAR TALKS FACE DEFINING QUESTION: WHAT HAPPENS TO IRAN’S URANIUM STOCKPILE?

A composite image shows President Donald Trump alongside a missile launch with the Iranian flag in the background. Nuclear experts are warning that Trump’s reported Iran framework could leave Tehran too much control over its uranium stockpile unless inspectors first fully account for and secure the material.(Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The warnings from experts come as the MOU has already been signed, while planned follow-up talks in Switzerland aimed at launching technical negotiations were postponed Friday. The delay leaves key nuclear details unresolved as the agreement begins a 60-day window for negotiating a final deal.

IAEA supervision would only be meaningful if inspectors first regain enough access to fully account for Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and ensure Tehran does not retain unchecked control of the material, nuclear experts who spoke with Fox News Digital warned. Meanwhile, a recent IAEA report released this month underscored the agency’s limited visibility into Iran’s declared nuclear program after last year’s military strikes, saying that aside from a single inspection at an Iranian nuclear power plant, the agency “has not received information from Iran” about the status of its other declared nuclear facilities or associated nuclear material. “Nor has the Agency had access” to those sites for in-field verification, the report noted.

A senior administration official told Fox News Digital on background that the MOU required Iran’s regime to reaffirm that it will not procure or develop nuclear weapons, calling that a critical first step under Iran’s new Supreme Leader.

The official said the U.S. has reached understandings with Iran when it comes to its uranium stockpile, and the new deal is the first step of turning these understandings into real results, which include progress on enriched uranium stockpiles, dismantlement of nuclear sites, an enrichment ban and inspection access. The official added that the U.S. has already had productive discussions with Iran on those issues and, now that the MOU is formally in place, negotiators will work to make quick progress.

US-IRAN TALKS POSTPONED IN SWITZERLAND AMID ISRAEL-HEZBOLLAH TENSIONS; HORMUZ REMAINS A KEY ISSUE

The official also referred Fox News Digital to comments Vice President JD Vance made Thursday, when he said the deal’s benefits depend on Iran following through on its promises.

“They have promised not to enrich. They have promised that they would allow inspectors in to destroy that highly enriched stockpile. And then, of course, it’s not usable anymore. You take it somewhere else,” Vance said. “They promised a number of things, and that’s why the deal contemplates a number of benefits if they do those things. But it doesn’t do anything if they don’t actually meet those promises.”

Vice President JD Vance listens as a reporter asks a question in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, on Thursday, June 18, 2026, in Washington.(Jacquelyn Martin/AP)

Andrea Stricker, deputy director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies’ Nonproliferation Program, told Fox News Digital that any credible agreement must begin with recovering and safeguarding Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile, and not allowing Tehran to keep control of the material while it is diluted inside the country.

“Without verifiably dismantling and destroying all of Iran’s fundamental nuclear capabilities — nuclear material, facilities, centrifuges, manufacturing capabilities, equipment, documentation, and weaponization capacities, and ensuring scientists are redirected to civilian work — Iran’s pledge on paper is meaningless,” she told Fox News Digital, noting that Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile could, if recovered and further enriched, provide enough weapons-grade material for roughly 22 nuclear weapons.

HOW DOES TRUMP SOLVE KEY ‘NUCLEAR DUST’ HANG-UP IN NEGOTIATIONS TO END IRAN WAR?

DeVore was more cautious about assigning a single number to Iran’s potential weapons capacity, saying the estimate depends heavily on the sophistication of the weapon design. He said the same stockpile could translate into fewer basic weapons or be stretched further by a more advanced nuclear program.

He said on-site downblending, if properly verified, would be aimed at making Iran’s roughly 1,000 pounds of 60% enriched uranium unavailable for further enrichment. DeVore cautioned that the material would still need additional processing to be turned into weapons-grade uranium and said he does not believe Tehran can currently do that because key facilities were destroyed in last year’s strikes.

A satellite image shows damage at the Fordo enrichment facility in Iran after U.S. strikes on June 22, 2025.(Maxar Technologies)

Asked what would be needed to make any Iran deal enforceable, DeVore told Fox News Digital the U.S. must avoid repeating what he described as a key weakness of the Obama-era nuclear deal: allowing Tehran to restrict access or keep certain sites off limits. He said the “ultimate question” is on-site verification, warning that Washington cannot allow itself to be pushed into “an agreement for agreement’s sake.”

TOP SENATE REPUBLICAN RIPS INTO TRUMP’S IRAN DEAL, SAYS $300B MAKES OBAMA DEAL LOOK LIKE ‘A PITTANCE’

DeVore also said the Obama-era JCPOA gave inspectors too much notice and too little freedom to inspect suspicious locations as well, arguing that any new deal must avoid a system where Iran can delay, limit or steer inspections before the IAEA gets on the ground.

The flag of Iran waves in front of the International Atomic Energy Agency headquarters in Vienna, Austria.(Florian Schroetter/AP Photo)

DeVore told Fox News Digital that his concern is informed by his experience as a young special assistant for foreign affairs in the Reagan administration, when he worked on verification issues surrounding Cold War-era nuclear agreements with the Soviet Union, including the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty and the Threshold Test Ban Treaty.

In those negotiations, DeVore said, the danger was that the minimum level of verification sought by defense and intelligence officials could become the starting point for diplomats, meaning the final deal could end up below what experts believed was necessary.

“Once you say, ‘This is the minimum we need,’ then that becomes the starting point, so anything agreed to is less than that,” DeVore said. “That’s what I fear.”

Fox News Digital reached out to the IAEA asking whether the agency can currently account for Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and whether it has any comment on the verification questions raised by the reported framework.

6月20日，两列货运列车在慕尼黑发生碰撞后脱轨，两节车厢从桥上坠落，落在道路上。 （路透社）

两列货运列车在德国南部城市慕尼黑一座桥上相撞，导致两节车厢脱轨并坠落到下方街道，造成一人死亡。

事故发生在星期六（6月20日）凌晨。消防部门发言人说，紧急救援部门于凌晨1时40分接到报警，称慕尼黑北部米尔贝茨霍芬区（Milbertshofen）发生一起列车相撞事故，约60名救援人员赶到现场。

新华社引述德国新闻社消息报道，两列货运列车在铁路桥上作业时发生碰撞，导致一列列车脱轨，两节车厢从约五米高的桥上坠落至公路上。

慕尼黑警方发言人告诉路透社，事故具体原因待查。警方未提供死者的更多信息，事发路段可能封闭至星期天（21日）。

Trump says Iran missiles ‘aren’t the problem’ after White House made them central to war rationale

June 20, 2026 10:20am EDT / Fox News

Rubio and Hegseth had described degrading Iran’s missile capabilities as a central objective of Operation Epic Fury

By Morgan Phillips Fox News

Published June 20, 2026 10:20am EDT

Trump discusses Iran, US-India relations during G7 bilateral meeting

President Donald Trump outlines the intricate details of the Iran deal, asserting America’s unparalleled military power during his bilateral meeting with Indian President Narendra Modi.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

For months, senior Trump administration officials argued that Iran’s ballistic missile arsenal helped shield Tehran’s nuclear ambitions and was a key reason the U.S. launched Operation Epic Fury attacks on the country.

Now, President Donald Trump is suggesting Iran having missiles may not be a problem at all.

“If other countries have them, it’s a little bit unfair for them not to have some. If Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and they all have some, I would say that in relative proportion, I think it’s okay,” Trump said at the G7 international forum Wednesday. “Am I going to let Saudi Arabia have missiles, but (Iran) can’t have them? It doesn’t work that way.”

“Missiles aren’t the problem. They hurt a little location, but they don’t blow up the planet.”

“The Gulf nations will address the nonnuclear issues, as we’ll be talking about the ballistic missiles,” the president added. “And we’ll talk, also, about the terrorist proxies that they have that — we don’t want that to happen.”

A map displays the range of ballistic missiles fired from Iran, highlighting areas within reach.(Fox News)

ISRAELI OFFICIALS REPORTEDLY WARN IRAN’S BALLISTIC MISSILES COULD TRIGGER SOLO MILITARY ACTION AGAINST TEHRAN

Trump made the remarks while discussing whether Iran should be permitted to retain missile capabilities in a news conference at the G7 in Évian-les-Bains, France, just as details of the memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Iran were being released.

The comments strike a much different tone than arguments repeatedly made by senior administration officials in recent months, who described Iran’s ballistic missile force as both a major threat to regional security and a protective shield for Iran’s nuclear program.

“Iran can never have a nuclear weapon, and we will not allow Iran to hide behind the immunity of a massive short-term ballistic missile inventory, or the ability to make them or launch them,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters in a press conference March 3. “What they are trying to do, and have been trying to do for a very long time, is build a conventional weapons capability as a shield to hide behind.”

TRUMP VOWS TO HIT IRAN ‘VERY HARD’ AFTER OBLITERATING NEARLY ’90 PERCENT’ OF REGIME MISSILES

Other senior officials repeatedly described degrading Iran’s missile capabilities as a central objective of Operation Epic Fury.

In remarks at the White House on March 2, days after the start of the operation, Trump said, “Our objectives are clear. First, we’re destroying Iran’s missile capabilities … and their capacity to produce brand new ones.”

War Secretary Pete Hegseth later said March 4 the mission was “laser-focused” on obliterating Iran’s missiles and the facilities that produce them, while White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the same day one of the administration’s primary goals was to “destroy the regime’s deadly ballistic missiles and completely raze their missile industry to the ground.”

Heavy weapons, including ballistic missiles, air defense systems and unmanned aerial vehicles, are displayed during the 44th anniversary of the eight-year war with Iraq, known as Holy Defense Week, at Baharestan Square in Tehran, Iran, on Sept. 25, 2024.(Photo by Fatemeh Bahrami/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Rubio repeatedly returned to the theme throughout the operation, arguing that degrading Iran’s missile force was necessary to prevent Iran from using conventional military power as cover for a future nuclear weapons program.

TRUMP SAYS US, ISRAEL SHATTERED IRANIAN MILITARY CAPABILITIES, PRESSES LEADERS TO SURRENDER: ‘CRY UNCLE’

“This is about very specific objectives,” Rubio told reporters March 30. “The President laid them out on the first night of the operation… Here they are — you should write them down. No. 1, the destruction of their air force. No. 2, the destruction of their navy. No. 3 the severe diminishing of their missile launching capability. And number four, the destruction of their factories so they can’t make more missiles and more drones to threaten us in the future. All of this so that they can never hide behind it to acquire a nuclear weapon. That was our objective from the beginning; that remains our objective now.”

Leavitt made similar comments the same day, saying the objectives of Operation Epic Fury included “destroying their ballistic missiles” and dismantling the infrastructure used to produce them while ensuring Iran never obtains a nuclear weapon.

Trump’s remarks at the G7 also raised questions about the administration’s approach to Iran’s nuclear program, another issue that administration officials had previously described in far less flexible terms.

Trump’s comments also come as the administration pursues a memorandum of understanding with Iran that leaves unresolved one of the central disputes in the nuclear negotiations: the future of Iran’s enrichment program.

Under the framework agreement unveiled in recent days, the United States and Iran agreed to spend 60 days negotiating the fate of Iran’s nearly 900-pound stockpile of near-weapons-grade 60% enriched uranium and any future enrichment activities. Administration officials said the minimum outcome under discussion would involve down-blending the material under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, while acknowledging that key details of a final agreement remain unsettled.

Officials described Iran’s willingness to dilute its stockpile as a significant concession, but also acknowledged that the memorandum does not resolve whether Iran will ultimately be permitted to retain any enrichment capability.

TRUMP REAFFIRMS HARD LINE ON IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL: ‘WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM’

The administration previously had drawn a much harder line on Iran’s nuclear program.(Nathan Laine/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Trump appeared to strike a more accommodating tone when discussing Iran’s access to nuclear power at the G7.

“It is a little hard, though, when you say that somebody wants it, other people have it, other, adjoining states have it. And you’re not letting them have it for purposes of electricity and things like that,” Trump said. “It’s always a little tough. You have to use a little common sense.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The administration previously had drawn a much harder line on Iran’s nuclear program. Special envoy Steve Witkoff said the United States could not allow Iran to retain “even 1%” enrichment capability, while White House officials repeatedly described the end of Iranian enrichment as a red line.

The White House referred back to Trump’s recent remarks on missiles when asked for additional comment. “

“We are going to let the President’s comments stand,” a State Department spokesperson said when asked for comment.

The Pentagon could not immediately be reached for comment.

6月20日，两列货运列车在慕尼黑发生碰撞后脱轨，两节车厢从桥上坠落，落在道路上。 （路透社）

两列货运列车在德国南部城市慕尼黑一座桥上相撞，导致两节车厢脱轨并坠落到下方街道，造成一人死亡。

事故发生在星期六（6月20日）凌晨。消防部门发言人说，紧急救援部门于凌晨1时40分接到报警，称慕尼黑北部米尔贝茨霍芬区（Milbertshofen）发生一起列车相撞事故，约60名救援人员赶到现场。

新华社引述德国新闻社消息报道，两列货运列车在铁路桥上作业时发生碰撞，导致一列列车脱轨，两节车厢从约五米高的桥上坠落至公路上。

慕尼黑警方发言人告诉路透社，事故具体原因待查。警方未提供死者的更多信息，事发路段可能封闭至星期天（21日）。