英格兰久攻不下加纳 痛失提前出线机会

2026年6月24日 06:53 / 联合早报

英格兰在第二场小组赛与加纳互交白卷。 （法新社）

“三狮军团”英格兰在新加坡时间星期三（6月24日）清晨进行的2026年世界杯小组赛中表现平平，最终与加纳0比0握手言和。

世界排名第四的英格兰与排名第73位的加纳展开小组头名之争。英格兰此役派出队长凯恩（Kane）和中场核心贝林厄姆（Bellingham）首发登场，试图以强大火力压制对手。

然而，尽管英格兰全场在控球率和传球次数上占据明显优势，并完成19次射门，但仅有三次射正，始终无法攻破加纳门将把守的大门。

面对实力明显占优的英格兰，加纳采取稳守反击策略，防线长时间退守禁区，并不断通过中场拦截限制对手进攻节奏。全场仅完成两次射门的他们，最终凭借顽强的防守顶住压力，在控球率不足三成的情况下成功守住平局。

两轮战罢，英格兰和加纳同样取得1胜1和积4分，前者暂以净胜球优势保住榜首。

L组另外两支球队巴拿马与克罗地亚则在第一轮均未能取得积分，目前分列第三和第四位。两队将在星期三上午7时展开直接对话，争取小组赛首个积分。

点击《联合早报》世界杯专页，获知世界杯比分、赛程和最新新闻等资讯。

White House accuses mainstream media of ‘parroting’ Iranian regime propaganda on nuclear deal terms

2026-06-23T17:54:55-04:00 / Fox News

A US official says Iran agreed to ‘robust’ inspections of nuclear sites following peace talks in Switzerland

By Preston Mizell Fox News

Published June 23, 2026 5:54pm EDT

Trump: Iran to allow inspectors, ‘nuclear honesty’

Fox News senior correspondent Benjamin Hall reports on U.S.-Iran negotiations and the mixed reaction to a potential deal, including growing concerns among Israelis over Hezbollah attacks, on ‘The Story.’

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/e365b5a4-da03-4421-8409-1b0d29252186

Listen to this article

4 min

EXCLUSIVE: The White House slammed the “mainstream media” for citing Iranian state media reports that Tehran has no intention of honoring the nuclear inspection commitments that Vice President JD Vance says were agreed upon.

Iran has agreed to “robust” inspections of its nuclear sites following the peace talks in Switzerland, according to a U.S. official. A White House official spoke to Fox News Digital on Tuesday, calling the sourcing for widespread reports from mainstream media outlets “propaganda from the Iranian regime.”

“For the tireless scolding we hear from the mainstream media about their ‘journalistic ethics’ and ‘integrity of their reporting,’ you’d think they would view the misinformation flowing from Iranian state media with a high level of skepticism,” a White House official told Fox News Digital.

The administration’s memorandum of understanding with Tehran has exposed a divide among Republicans over what constitutes victory after the military campaign against Iran.(Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

“Instead, the American press has spent every waking hour of this negotiating process mindlessly parroting hardliner propaganda from the Iranian regime,” the official added. “The President and Vice President of the United States, along with the entire U.S. negotiating team, are working around the clock to secure a great deal for the American people, and the updates they’ve provided on this process have been the truth.”

LEAVITT REBUKES MEDIA OUTLETS RUNNING WITH IRANIAN NARRATIVES ON 10 DEMANDS

Critics cited Iranian state media’s reporting that nuclear inspections would not be honored, despite Vance and the White House saying that the terms of the deal included the provision.

“Despite their protestations and false statements to the contrary, coupled with the drumbeat of the Fake News, which is doing everything possible to make the U.S. Victory as small and insignificant as possible, Iran has fully and completely agreed to highest level Nuclear inspections long into the future (Infinity!!!),” President Donald Trump said in a Truth Social post.

Vice President JD Vance speaks to members of the media after the U.S. and Iran held high-level talks aimed at advancing a deal to end the Middle East conflict at the Lake Lucerne Summit, near Lake Lucerne, Switzerland, on June 22, 2026.(Nathan Howard / POOL / AFP via Getty Images)

A source familiar with the talks expressed frustration to Fox News Digital over the irony of pundits speaking out against the deal for using talking points from Iranian public figures and state media, likening dialogue and reporting to an unwitting support for the Iranian regime.

US OFFICIAL SAYS JD VANCE MADE ‘GREAT PROGRESS’ IN IRAN TALKS, CALLS SNUB REPORTS ‘FOREIGN PROPAGANDA’

A number of reports from mainstream outlets this week cited information surrounding Vance allegedly being snubbed by the Qataris after Qatar’s prime minister and chief negotiator, Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, walked past Vance and warmly greeted Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif instead.

In an interview on Monday with Qatar-funded media outlet, Al Jazeera, Al Thani denied snubbing Vance, saying he had just spent hours with Vance and hadn’t yet greeted Sharif. He blamed the media for misrepresenting the encounter. “And they just made the issue too big,” he said.

The U.S. delegation, including Steve Witkoff, JD Vance and Jared Kushner, arrived in Switzerland.(Nathan Howard/Pool/REUTERS)

A U.S. official told Fox News Digital the U.S. team had already been meeting with Qatari officials for hours, eliminating the need for a ceremonial greeting. The official added that the leaders’ joint remarks before the meeting were organized impromptu rather than as a staged public appearance.

IRANIAN PRESIDENT CALLS FOR NEGOTIATION AND DIALOGUE AS NUCLEAR TALKS CONTINUE

Some reports also said the Iranians walked away from the negotiating table while Vance and the White House delegation were still in Switzerland. The reports mainly cited Iranian state media as a source.

Vance said that there were threats to walk out, but denied the reports and allegations that the Iranians walked away from the table when speaking to the press on Tuesday.

“They didn’t walk out, and their technical team is still here in Bürgenstock, working with our technical team,” Vance said. “When they make threats that aren’t rooted in reality, they have to accept that the President of the United States is actually going to set the record straight. That’s all that happened. So, yes, there was a little bit of threatening, there was a little bit of whining, but at the end of the day, the talks continued, and we made great progress.”

Vice President JD Vance said the Iranians have agreed to allow nuclear inspectors back into their country.(Photo by Spencer Platt / POOL / AFP via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

During a news conference on Tuesday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Tehran will never negotiate its missile defense capabilities with any nation and stated that Iran believes “regional peace and stability can only be achieved through honest dialogue and intra-regional cooperation.”

President Trump told reporters on Tuesday that he expects nuclear inspections to occur “at the appropriate time.”

Preston Mizell is a writer with Fox News Digital covering breaking news.

Federal court allows ICE to expand expedited deportations nationwide

2026-06-23T17:20:00-0400 / CBS News

By Camilo Montoya-Galvez Immigration Correspondent

Camilo Montoya-Galvez is the Immigration Correspondent at CBS News, where his reporting is featured across multiple programs and platforms, including national broadcast shows, CBS News 24/7, CBSNews.com and the organization’s social media accounts.

Read Full Bio

Updated on: June 23, 2026 / 7:26 PM EDT / CBS News

A federal appeals court on Tuesday allowed the Trump administration to move forward with an effort to expand fast-track deportations throughout the U.S., in a legal win for the president’s crackdown on illegal immigration.

The 2-1 decision by a panel of judges at the U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Columbia Circuit allows the Department of Homeland Security to carry out an expansion of the expedited removal process, which empowers federal immigration officials to deport some detainees without court hearings.

Before the second Trump administration, the expedited removal policy was limited to areas close to the border and only applied to recent entrants who could not prove they had been living in the country for more than two weeks.

But the policy allowed to take effect Tuesday — which was drafted in the first week of President Trump’s second term in January 2025 — expands expedited removal to anywhere in the United States. Officials can use it on any unauthorized immigrant who cannot prove they have been in the country for more than two years.

In August 2025, a federal judge found the Trump administration’s expansion of expedited removal violated due process rights,following a lawsuit from immigrant advocacy group Make the Road New York. The panel of appellate judges disagreed Tuesday, invalidating her order.

The two appellate judges in the majority — Trump-appointed Justin Walker and Neomi Rao — found the policy offers sufficient due process protections.

“Make the Road has not shown that the expedited-removal process denies its members notice and an opportunity to be heard,” they wrote.

Last August, a lower court judge called the government’s procedures for ensuring people aren’t accidentally subjected to expedited removal “woefully inadequate,” writing that migrants were not even informed of the fact that being in the country for at least two years is a possible defense. On Tuesday, the appellate court pushed back, finding that standard “would require immigration officers to provide what amounts to legal advice.”

Obama-appointed Circuit Judge Robert Wilkins dissented from the core of the ruling, arguing the policy deprives people of due process rights. In part, he wrote that the policy doesn’t require immigration officials to ask migrants how long they have been in the country, or inform them of the two-year rule.

“Absent such knowledge, the noncitizen is simply left to hope that the immigration officer will conclude that they have met their burden of demonstrating two-years of continuous presence at the initial screening interview,” Wilkins wrote.

James Percival, the top lawyer at DHS, said Tuesday’s order “vindicated our decision to apply the law as written.”

“It’s not too late to take a $2,600 check and a free flight home!” Percival added, referring to the Trump administration’s incentives to push people in the U.S. illegally to self-deport.

Anand Balakrishnan, senior staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union and lead counsel in the lawsuit over the expedited removal policy, said the group is “exploring next steps.”

“The Trump administration’s push for fast-track deportations will subject people to an unfair and error-prone system,” Balakrishnan said in a statement. “This ruling undermines the fundamental principle that people receive due process when the government seeks to deport them.”

Make the Road New York Deputy Director Yaritza Mendez said in a statement: “The Trump administration’s attempt to expand expedited removal is just one of the many attacks that immigrant communities face daily. If allowed to move forward, it would severely undermine due process and lead to countless unjust or wrongful deportations, irreparably tearing apart families forever.”

The expansion of expedited removal is part of a series of Trump administration policies designed to surge deportations by speeding up the process. Last month, the government hired its largest-ever class of immigration judges, onboarding dozens of judges after pushing out more than 100, some of whom allege they were fired for not backing mass deportations.

The administration has also sought to hold large numbers of immigration detainees without bond hearings, drawing scores of legal challenges. And early last year, the government used the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to rapidly deport hundreds of Venezuelan men accused of belonging to the gang Tren De Aragua, drawing due process concerns.

US Commerce Secretary signals possible action on Chinese robots after review, Politico reports

June 23, 2026 8:06 PM UTC / Updated 46 mins ago / By Reuters

U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick speaks in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 11, 2026. REUTERS/Daniel Heuer

June 23 (Reuters) – U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told executives at a closed-door meeting Monday that his department is studying Chinese state-subsidized robotics imports and signaled the administration could take action once the review is complete, Politico reported on Tuesday, citing sources.

“We don’t want state subsidized robotics attacking us in America, this is the arms race that is coming — robotic arms are coming,” the Politico quoted Lutnick as saying. “We need to make sure they’re produced in America so we’re going to study those right now.”

Get weekly news and analysis on U.S. politics and how it matters to the world with the Reuters Politics U.S. newsletter. Sign up here.

Reuters could not immediately verify the report.

Reporting by Preetika Parashuraman in Bengaluru, Editing by Franklin Paul

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

阿里巴巴起诉美国防部 寻求从涉军名单中移除

2026年6月24日 07:11 / 联合早报

阿里巴巴起诉美国国防部，要求将公司名字从涉军名单移除。 （路透社档案照）

中国科技巨头阿里巴巴起诉美国国防部，要求将公司名字从涉军名单移除。

据彭博社报道，阿里巴巴在星期二（6月23日）提交的诉状中称，美国国防部将阿里巴巴列入涉嫌支持中国人民解放军的企业名单时既未提供充分证据，也未作出合理解释。

阿里在向加州圣何塞联邦法院提交的诉状中表示，这一决定违反了美国宪法规定的正当程序原则，也侵犯了公司的言论自由权。

本月早些时候，美国国防部指控包括阿里巴巴、百度、比亚迪在内的多家中国大型企业为解放军提供支持。其他被列入1260H名单的中国企业还包括长鑫存储、长江存储以及机器人开发商宇树科技。

中国互联网巨头腾讯控股去年已被列入该名单。

五角大楼更新涉军中企名单 分析称美国视技术栈为战略竞争领域

阿里巴巴表示，围绕这一认定问题，公司数月来一直与美国国防部沟通。至少从今年2月开始，双方就已展开接触，当时国防部曾短暂公布过一版名单，但数分钟后又在未作解释的情况下撤回。

阿里巴巴称，公司曾提交详细证据证明自身并非解放军支持者，当时回答了相关问题并递交书面回应，但美国防部从未作出回复。

尽管被列入名单不会立即带来重大法律后果，但美国防部正越来越多地利用该名单限制相关企业与美军签订合同或获得科研资金。列入1260H名单也被视为向美国投资者发出的警示信号，通常被认为可能是未来将面临更严厉贸易限制的前兆。

2025财年《国防授权法案》规定，自6月30日起，美国国防部不得与任何为1260H名单上的中国企业进行游说或辩护的机构签订合同。

阿里巴巴在诉状中表示，被列入1260H名单后，公司无法继续聘请多年来长期合作的游说机构，包括帮助其挑战“支持军方”标签所需的律师和政策顾问。

阿里巴巴还指出，美国政府缺乏基本的正当程序保障，该公司是通过阅读《联邦公报》才得知自己被认定为中国军方支持者。

It’s a 6-3 Supreme Court: Ideological splits mount ahead of major end-of-term rulings

2026-06-23T21:24:41.463Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/23/politics/6-3-supreme-court

The Supreme Court hit an inauspicious milestone Tuesday as it raced to finish its most divisive pending cases by the end of the month: It has already handed down more 6-3 decisions along ideological lines than it did for the entire term that ended last year.

As it navigates a charged political atmosphere during President Donald Trump’s second term and endures sharp criticism from the left and right, the court has already split into conservative and liberal camps in seven decisions this year — one more than last year — before it even gets to major cases on presidential power and transgender rights.

Some of those decisions, including on whether Trump may fire officials at independent federal agencies like the Federal Trade Commission, may also divide the court along ideological lines. The justices are scheduled to drop their next batch of opinions on Thursday.

Four of the five decisions the court released Tuesday were 6-3.Those included a ruling that barred a Rastafarian man from suing prison officials who violated a federal law when they cut his dreadlocks and a decision that permitted Exxon to sue over property confiscated by the Cuban government in 1960.

The most significant 6-3 decision so far this term was the court’s April ruling that gutted the Voting Rights Act’s power over redistricting disputes. The decision, and several that followed from it, helped Republicans quickly redraw congressional district in Southern states like Louisiana and Alabama to give the GOP an advantage in this year’s midterm elections.

And those numbers do not take into account rulings on the court’s emergency docket, where the liberal and conservative wings have split more frequently.

“The court’s tendency to decide important cases along 6-3 partisan lines is a serious problem for the court’s legitimacy,” said David Cole, a Georgetown Law professor who frequently argued before the court as the legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union. “The justices are supposed to be guided by law, not politics.”

“Even if many divides reflect differences in legal worldview, not politics, the more they divide along party lines, the less credibility the court has as an institution,” Cole said.

To be sure, some of the most important cases this term have brought liberal and conservative justices together. The court’s decision in February to invalidate Trump’s sweeping global tariffs counted three conservatives and three liberals in the majority. Last week, the court unanimously decided that the Second Amendment barred the government from disarming a Texas man just because he frequently smokes pot.

But the number of 6-3 ideological decisions is often trotted out by the court’s critics and its supporters as both attempt to frame the court’s direction as they lodge and parry criticism of how the court is resolving politically fraught issues.The justices themselves will often brush aside the 6-3 outcomes and point out the large share of cases that are decided unanimously, even though those usually involve more technical questions with far less reach.

“It bothers me because it’s not accurate,” Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a conservative, said last month at the George W. Bush Presidential Center of the focus on 6-3 decisions. The far higher share of opinions that are decided unanimously, Barrett said, “is not the narrative that’s portrayed in the media.”

https://www.cnn.com/

An explosive appeal from Trump over E. Jean Carroll sexual abuse verdict stalls at the Supreme Court

1:22

Speaking at the Reagan Library last month, Justice Neil Gorsuch made a similar point.

“Nine old people appointed by five different presidents over the course of 30 years from all around the country, and we are able to resolve cases lower courts disagreed on unanimously 40% of the time,” said Gorsuch, who was Trump’s first nominee to the high court. “I think that’s something.”

The high court has decided more than half of its 46 decisions so far this term unanimously, a slightly higher share than last year by the end of June. But the biggest and most complicated decisions delivered in the final days of a term are rarely unanimous. With a dozen cases still waiting for a ruling this year, the share of unanimous cases will likely plummet.

From 2020 to 2024, nearly 14% of the court’s merits decisions were split along ideological lines, according to data compiled by SCOTUSblog.

Even before the court turned toward its final month, the justices increasingly were sniping at one another — in written opinions and in public — over their role in the redistricting cases.

“Courts are apolitical,” liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the court’s most junior justice, said last month. “We have to be scrupulous about sticking to the principles and the rules that we apply in every case and not look as though we’re doing something different in this kind of context.”

Jackson’s point echoed a dissent she wrote in an emergency docket case days earlier involving Louisiana’s ability to quickly redraw its congressional districts. Justice Samuel Alito, a member of the court’s conservative wing, responded in a brief concurring opinion by describing Jackson’s points as “trivial at best” and “baseless and insulting.”

“What principle has the court violated?” Alito wrote. “The principle that we should never take any action that might unjustifiably be criticized as partisan?”

In addition to the decisions Tuesday on religion and Exxon’s ability to sue Cuban entities, the court split 6-3 in a decision that will make it easier for the government to deport green card holders who are convicted of certain crimes. It also split along ideological lines on the most substantial holding of a decision that blocks members of the Falun Gong religious movement from suing Cisco for selling equipment to the Chinese government they said aided and abetted the group’s torture.

Over the next week, the court is expected to rule on Trump’s effort to end birthright citizenship as it has been understood for more than a century as well as the president’s attempt to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. Based on the oral arguments, those decisions may well wind up with some conservatives and liberals together in the majority.

But also pending are cases dealing with the president’s power to fire the leaders of other independent agencies, turn away asylum seekers at the border and cancel temporary deportation protections for Haitian and Syrian nationals. The court is considering an important Second Amendment case over a Hawaii law that makes it harder to carry guns into private property open to the public, like retail stores.

And it is weighing two cases dealing with laws enacted by West Virginia and Idaho that ban transgender girls from competing on girls’ sports teams.

All of those are candidates for splitting the court 6-3.

ODNI under Pulte fires 6 staff, sends 45 back to home agencies

2026-06-23T18:24:00-0400 / CBS News

By

Updated on: June 23, 2026 / 6:54 PM EDT / CBS News

Just over 50 career and political intelligence staff at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence have been removed from their roles since Bill Pulte became the agency’s acting director, Friday.

Six career and political intelligence staff were terminated and 45 were sent back to their home agencies, according to three sources familiar with the personnel moves.

Pulte has been asking deputies and other directors for suggestions about cuts. Some of the ODNI deputies pushed for more cuts, but Pulte said that the 51 was enough for now, one of the sources said.

One source characterized the cuts as thoughtful and methodical. No staffers have been removed from the counterterrorism group.

No further firings are planned for now, two of the sources said.

The cuts follow hundreds of staff reductions last year by former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who stepped down last week. Last year’s planned downsizing sought to bring the office’s headcount from 2,000 to around 1,300.

President Trump has pushed for further cuts, directing Pulte to “execute the immediate and needed downsizing of the office” in a Truth Social post earlier this month.

The office is charged with overseeing the country’s intelligence agencies and helping them coordinate with each other. It was created in response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, which investigators widely believe was preceded by a failure of intelligence agencies to share information.

Since then, Gabbard and some lawmakers have argued the ODNI has become bloated and has added more bureaucracy to the intelligence community — worsening a problem it was created in part to resolve.

Republican Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, said earlier this month the office has “grown far beyond its original mandate.” Many of the office’s staff hail from other intelligence agencies but have been detailed to ODNI, and Cotton argued large numbers of them should be returned to their “home agencies.”

Sen. Mark Warner and Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrats on the Senate and House intelligence panels, warned Pulte against making large-scale staff cuts, calling it an inappropriate course of action for an acting official without national security experience.

“While there is room to consider responsible reductions to ODNI’s workforce, any large cuts would follow on a substantial downsizing that has already occurred in 2025 and risk jeopardizing the mission of an organization explicitly created after 9/11 to prevent any future such terrorist attack,” the two Democrats wrote in a joint statement.

After Gabbard announced in May that she would resign from the post, Mr. Trump said he would install Pulte, a housing finance official, as acting director of national intelligence. He later nominated Jay Clayton, the top federal prosecutor in Manhattan, to serve as Senate-confirmed director.

Mr. Trump’s pick for acting director of national intelligence, who assumed the role on Friday, has sparked intense pushback in Congress. Democrats, and some Republicans, questioned the selection due to his lack of national security experience.

Democratic Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado said Sunday he’s worried that “Americans are at risk” with Pulte serving as DNI “because we have someone who’s incompetent at the head of this agency,” in an interview on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.”

In addition to Pulte’s lack of national security experience, Democrats have railed against the pick for his role in investigations into Mr. Trump’s political foes. Crow, who serves on the House Intelligence Committee, said he’s “obviously concerned that this is somebody who’s a political attack dog, and his single biggest qualification is that he’s loyal to Donald Trump and is willing to go after Donald Trump’s enemies.” But he said more immediately, he’s concerned about Americans’ safety.

“This is a really important position. This sits atop our intelligence agencies, and by law, Congress mandated that this person have significant intelligence experience because they have to make sure that we’re keeping Americans safe, which is not what Bill Pulte is capable of doing,” Crow said.

Since Pulte’s selection, Democrats have declined to extend Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which grants intelligence agencies broad authority to spy on overseas targets, causing the legal provision to expire earlier this month.

And as Senate GOP leaders tried to bring an end to the impasse by moving to quickly confirm Clayton as permanent director of national intelligence, the president abruptly called for Clayton’s confirmation hearing to be canceled last week.

Talks on extending FISA Section 702 were already strained, with some members of both parties pushing for stricter guardrails and arguing the program can scoop up Americans’ communications without a warrant. Intelligence officials say the program is essential to national security.

Asked whether Democrats have miscalculated, Crow said “not at all.”

“I know how important it is, but I’m unwilling to trade Americans’ constitutional rights, privacy and essential civil liberties for temporary extension to this program,” Crow said.

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said on “Face the Nation” that “any Democrat that shuts down FISA at a time of great peril for the United States is making a huge mistake.”

“We’re playing with fire here, no matter what side does it,” Graham said. “America needs FISA up and running.”

Margaret Brennan, Kaia Hubbard and Joe Walsh contributed to this report.

中国深化涉麻精药品等成瘾性物质打击整治

2026年6月24日 07:45 / 联合早报

中国国务委员、国家禁毒委员会主任王小洪要求，深化涉麻精药品等成瘾性物质打击整治，持续向毒品犯罪发起凌厉攻势。

据中新社报道，在第39个国际禁毒日到来之际，王小洪星期二（6月23日）到北京市少年宫、北京市禁毒科技中心和国药物流有限责任公司调研禁毒工作，看望慰问一线禁毒工作者。

他说，要深入学习贯彻中共总书记习近平关于禁毒工作的重要指示精神，坚定拥护“两个确立”、坚决做到“两个维护”，树立和践行正确政绩观，坚持综合施策、系统治理，进一步健全毒品治理体系，纵深推进新时代禁毒人民战争。

在北京市少年宫，王小洪实地调研“护航青少年健康成长”禁毒宣传主题活动开展情况，观摩禁毒文化作品展、禁毒戏剧社、“禁毒卫士”体验营等活动，并与现场开展活动的青少年互动交流。他指出，要创新开展全民禁毒宣传教育，以防范药物滥用为重点，突出抓好青少年毒品预防教育，筑牢青少年识毒拒毒防线，共同呵护青少年特别是未成年人健康成长。

在北京市禁毒科技中心，王小洪深入了解缴获麻精药品检验鉴定和禁毒科技应用等工作。他强调，要紧密结合推进公安机关新质战斗力提升工程，加强禁毒基础技术研究，健全毒情监测预警网络，强化科技赋能禁毒实战，深化涉麻精药品等成瘾性物质打击整治，持续向毒品犯罪发起凌厉攻势。

王小洪还到国药物流有限责任公司，仔细听取麻精药品经营和流通管理等情况介绍。他要求，围绕麻精药品生产、储存、运输、销售、使用等各环节，坚持全链条追溯制度，推进落实信息化管理措施，建立完善更加积极主动的行刑衔接机制，严防出现流弊、形成滥用。

Biden judge overruled on key Trump immigration policy

June 23, 2026 7:24pm EDT / Fox News

The 2-1 ruling vacates a lower court order that had blocked the policy on due process grounds

By Elaine Mallon, Fox News

Fox News Justice correspondent David Spunt has the details on Abraham Hermosillo Alvarez, the alleged ringleader of a plot to attack the White House UFC event, on ‘America Reports.’

The Trump administration scored a major immigration win Monday after a federal appeals court revived its nationwide expedited removal policy, clearing the way for the Department of Homeland Security to resume fast-track deportations of eligible illegal immigrants.

The ruling allows federal immigration authorities to quickly remove certain migrants found anywhere in the country if they were not lawfully admitted or paroled into the U.S. and cannot show they have continuously lived in the country for at least two years.

In a 2-1 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated a lower court order that had blocked the policy, concluding that challengers were unlikely to succeed on their claims that the expansion violates constitutional due process protections.

“DHS thereby exercised its discretion to apply its expedited-removal authority to the maximum extent allowed by law,” Judge Justin Walker wrote for the court.

TRUMP’S ICE LAUNCHES BOLD COURTHOUSE MIGRANT ARREST STRATEGY TO FAST-TRACK DEPORTATIONS BIDEN AVOIDED

Federal law enforcement officers with Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Enforcement and Removal Operations conducted a traffic stop and detained people in Washington on Nov. 17, 2025.(Alex Brandon/AP Photo)

DHS praised the ruling.

“For years, DHS has arbitrarily limited expedited removal to 14 days even though it applies to illegal aliens who entered the country illegally within the last two years,” DHS General Counsel James Percival said in a statement to Fox News Digital. “Today, the D.C. Circuit vindicated our decision to apply the law as written. It’s not too late to take a $2,600 check and a free flight home!”

The ruling reverses a nationwide stay issued by U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb, a Biden appointee, who found the policy created a significant risk that individuals could be wrongly deported before having a meaningful opportunity to prove they were exempt from expedited removal.

The Trump administration first expanded expedited removal nationwide during Trump’s first term in 2019. The Biden administration later rescinded the policy before DHS reinstated it shortly after Trump returned to office in January 2025.

The majority concluded that the Constitution requires the government to notify illegal immigrants when they are facing deportation and give them an opportunity to respond, but does not require immigration officials to explain every potential legal defense that could prevent their removal.

APPEALS COURT GRANTS TRUMP SHORT-TERM WIN OVER BOASBERG IN IMMIGRATION RULING

“The constitutional requirement is notice of the action the government is taking and the grounds for it, plus an opportunity to respond,” Walker wrote. “It is not a requirement that the government explain how the individual might prevail.”

The court rejected arguments that DHS must proactively inform individuals they can avoid expedited removal by proving they have continuously lived in the United States for at least two years.

U.S. President Donald J. Trump watches the UFC lightweight championship fight during the UFC Freedom 250 event on the South Lawn at the White House on June 14, 2026 in Washington, DC(Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC)

“If due process requires the government to inform individuals of the two-year continuous-presence rule, it presumably also requires informing them of every other basis for contesting expedited removal,” Walker wrote. “Make the Road offers no limiting principle and identifies no authority for so expansive a requirement.”

The majority also dismissed claims that examples of wrongful deportations demonstrated the policy itself was unconstitutional.

“To be sure, the record contains evidence that some aliens have been erroneously subjected to expedited removal despite having been present for more than two years,” the opinion stated. “If so, that’s illegal. But the cause there would be individual officers’ failure to follow the law — not defects in the written directives under review.”

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin testifies before the House Committee on Homeland Security during a hearing on the Fiscal 2027 budget request for the Department of Homeland Security, in Washington, Wednesday, June 3, 2026.(Cliff Owen)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Judge Robert Wilkins dissented, arguing that DHS’s procedures do not give migrants a meaningful chance to prove they have lived in the United States for at least two years and therefore may not qualify for expedited removal.

“DHS is using procedures that do not allow a meaningful opportunity for noncitizens to demonstrate that they have been continuously present in the United States for two years,” Wilkins wrote.

Elaine Mallon is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business covering national politics.

House approves major housing affordability bill, sending bipartisan measure to Trump

June 23, 2026 7:32 PM EDT / CBS News

By

Caitlin Yilek Politics Reporter
Caitlin Yilek is a politics reporter at CBSNews.com, based in Washington, D.C. She previously worked for the Washington Examiner and The Hill, and was a member of the 2022 Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellowship with the National Press Foundation.

Read Full Bio

Washington — The House on Tuesday passed a landmark housing affordability bill, marking a rare bipartisan legislative accomplishment as lawmakers seek to address rising costs ahead of the midterm elections.

House GOP leaders fast-tracked the legislation after the Senate approved it with overwhelming bipartisan support Monday. It passed the House in a 358 to 32 vote and now heads to President Trump to sign into law.

The legislation, known as the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, is the product of months of negotiations and aims to increase housing supply and lower prices. It places limits on corporate investors buying single-family homes, streamlines environmental reviews and removes regulatory barriers to speed up the construction process.

After months of back-and-forth, the four lawmakers spearheading the legislation announced an agreement to move forward. The push was led by GOP Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee; Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee; GOP Rep. French Hill of Arkansas, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee; and Rep. Maxine Waters of California, the top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee.

“This final product advances practical, bipartisan and bicameral solutions to modernize federal housing programs, reduce regulatory burdens, streamline the development process and help build more homes to meet that growing demand and keep the American dream within reach,” Hill said Tuesday on the House floor. “This bicameral bipartisan bill before us today reflects the ideas from both chambers and demonstrates what can be accomplished when Congress focuses on solving problems for the American people.”

Earlier this month, the White House called on Congress to pass the bill, noting the provision setting restrictions on corporate investors owning single-family properties. A presidential proclamation called it “the most comprehensive and consequential housing legislation in the history of our country.”

But how big of an impact the provision will have on affordability is up for debate. Large institutional investors account for just 3% of single-family rentals, or less than half a percent of the total single-family housing stock, according to the think tank Urban Institute.

“A lot of people think that if we get rid of private equity, there will be all these houses available for sale for first-time homebuyers,” said Daryl Fairweather, chief economist at the real estate firm Redfin. “But that’s not going to happen.”

Lawmakers acknowledged there’s still more work to do to address the housing crisis, but touted the legislation as a promising first step.

“Today’s vote proves that it is possible to find bipartisan, common ground on legislation that actually helps the American people. And, importantly, it proves that bipartisan legislation doesn’t have to be the weakest, most milquetoast agreement that doesn’t offend anyone or do too much to help anyone either,” Warren said in a floor speech ahead of Monday’s vote.

Mary Cunningham contributed to this report.