新闻


赫格塞斯称弹劾动议是政策争议,但议员的指控是否构成重罪?
法律专家解析托马斯·马斯蒂议员针对战争部长的决议是否达到弹劾级别

摩根·菲利普斯、阿什利·J·迪梅拉 | 福克斯新闻报道
2026年11月10日 美国东部时间下午4:44

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/morgan-headshot-2.jpg

NEW 现在您可以收听福克斯新闻的文章。

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/00d06428-0da7-4a4e-85e3-a5190fbcd7e2

收听这篇文章
8分钟时长

战争部长皮特·赫格塞斯周二驳斥了弹劾动议,指责议员们试图将对唐纳德·特朗普总统军事政策的分歧转化为可弹劾的罪名。

国会正准备就八项指控投票,指控这位五角大楼负责人违反联邦法律、滥用职权。

“一名心怀不满的议员想就政策分歧大做文章。就是这么回事:政策分歧,而非重罪、轻罪、叛国、贿赂,也并非制宪者在制定弹劾条款时所指的那些罪行,”赫格塞斯周二上午在五角大楼的新闻发布会上表示。

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

“解决政策分歧的恰当手段是立法、辩论,以及下一次总统选举,”他补充道。

但肯塔基州共和党众议员托马斯·马斯蒂周一提出的弹劾决议,超出了对政府军事战略的反对范畴。决议指控赫格塞斯违反国会战争权力、授权非法军事行动,并因一名在职参议员行使宪法权利而对其进行报复。

赫格塞斯抨击针对离任共和党人的弹劾动议是“闹剧”、“作秀”

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/pete-hegseth-pointed-response.jpg

弗吉尼亚州阿灵顿——11月10日:2026年11月10日,在弗吉尼亚州阿灵顿的五角大楼新闻发布会上,美国战争部长皮特·赫格塞斯回答记者提问。肯塔基州共和党众议员托马斯·马斯蒂周一提出针对赫格塞斯的弹劾条款,指控他未经国会授权对伊朗发动战争及其他违宪行为。(图片来源:Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

这场冲突将弹劾的界限置于围绕特朗普国家安全议程的日益激烈的斗争中心,考验议员们能否提出罢免赫格塞斯的宪法依据,还是只是利用弹劾来挑战他们反对的军事和政策决策。

马斯蒂提出的八项条款聚焦特朗普政府最具争议的几项国家安全决策,其中三项指控赫格塞斯在对伊朗的战争期间违反《战争权力决议》。

这位离任的肯塔基州共和党人声称,赫格塞斯未经国会授权就发起敌对行动,在国会下令终止军事行动后仍持续推进,并无视要求撤出美军的法定期限。

其他条款指控赫格塞斯未遵守旨在减少平民伤亡的相关法律,包括针对伊朗一所学校的袭击事件,以及在加勒比海地区对疑似贩毒集团发动非法海上袭击。

7名共和党人反对特朗普,与民主党联手限制伊朗战争权力

该决议还指控赫格塞斯针对亚利桑那州民主党参议员马克·凯利采取报复行动——凯利曾发布视频敦促军人拒绝非法命令,此外还指控赫格塞斯非法指导在也门的军事行动以及抓捕委内瑞拉前领导人尼古拉斯·马杜罗。

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/thomas-massie-november-9-2026.jpg

2026年11月9日,肯塔基州共和党众议员托马斯·马斯蒂在华盛顿特区美国国会大厦外发表弹劾美国战争部长皮特·赫格塞斯的讲话。(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

马斯蒂驳斥了弹劾动议只是对赫格塞斯的工作表现或政府军事政策进行公投的说法。

“问题在于他是否犯下了可弹劾的行为,”马斯蒂周一在X平台上发文称,“答案是肯定的,共八项。”

宪法法学专家乔纳森·特利基本认同弹劾动议站不住脚,认为马斯蒂的八项条款中有六项应当直接驳回。

“在我看来,八项条款中有六项都不应成立,包括涉及伊朗的条款,”特利周二在X平台上发文称。

特利承认,国会在主张自身战争权力方面具有合法的宪法利益,但他认为马斯蒂正试图利用弹劾来解决长期以来关于总统权力的争议。他指出,包括比尔·克林顿、巴拉克·奥巴马和乔·拜登在内的两党总统都声称拥有未经国会批准就发起军事行动的广泛权力。

“马斯蒂不会通过弹劾来‘解决’这一问题,”特利写道,他认为特朗普是在行使其前任长期主张的权力。

共和党众议员托马斯·马斯蒂针对战争部长皮特·赫格塞斯提出八项弹劾条款

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/defense-hegseth-senate-committee-capitol-hill-04-30-2026-fox-news.jpg

美国国防部长皮特·赫格塞斯于2026年4月30日周四在华盛顿国会山出席参议院军事委员会听证会。(Cliff Owen/AP Photo)

副总统JD·万斯周二则认为,议员们正将弹劾作为行使立法权力的替代手段。

“皮特·赫格塞斯是否犯下了可弹劾的罪行?这个问题很荒谬,答案显然是否定的,”万斯在X平台上写道。

“国会有太多工具来表达其政策分歧。他们不用这些工具,反倒要试图弹劾皮特·赫格塞斯,”他继续说道。

万斯认为,这一动议的背后动因较少是针对伊朗战争,更多是反对赫格塞斯在五角大楼推行的更广泛改革,包括将美军调离欧洲和乌克兰,以及重组军队高级领导层。

特朗普的五角大楼改组重振了一场历史悠久的总统权力博弈

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/pete-hegseth-pushes-back-impeachment-talk.jpg

弗吉尼亚州阿灵顿——11月10日:2026年11月10日,在弗吉尼亚州阿灵顿的五角大楼新闻发布会上,美国战争部长皮特·赫格塞斯发表讲话。肯塔基州共和党众议员托马斯·马斯蒂周一提出针对赫格塞斯的弹劾条款,指控他未经国会授权对伊朗发动战争及其他违宪行为。(图片来源:Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

“这跟伊朗无关,而是因为皮特挑战了五角大楼的官僚体系,”万斯写道。

戏剧性视频显示美军袭击期间,疑似贩毒船只燃起火球

特利驳回了涉及马杜罗抓捕事件的弹劾条款,他指出美国抓捕巴拿马前领导人曼努埃尔·诺列加的相关法院先例。

但特利区分了这些关于行政权力的争议与他认为更严重的两项指控:针对疑似贩毒集团的海上袭击,以及赫格塞斯对待参议员马克·凯利的做法。

“‘双重打击’指控若属实将构成战争罪,”特利写道,并指出特朗普和赫格塞斯否认发布过此类命令。

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/trump-hegseth-1.jpg

因凯利发布敦促军人拒绝非法命令的视频而惩罚他的举动,也引发了关于在职参议员言论自由权利及潜在不当指挥影响力的严重问题,特利认为。

不过,他并未得出任何一项指控符合弹劾的宪法标准的结论,称需要更多证据。

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

民主党支持共和党议员发起的赫格塞斯弹劾动议,暗示明年1月还有更多动作

“我将研究这两项指控的相关证据,”他写道,称两者都存在潜在问题,但难以被认定为“重罪和轻罪”。

宪法规定可因叛国、贿赂或其他重罪和轻罪而实施弹劾,该标准不要求证明存在犯罪行为。国会历史上一直将严重滥用公职权力视为潜在弹劾理由,尽管具体界限仍存在争议。

这一区别使得仅因涉及军事政策就驳回相关指控的论点变得复杂。议员们可以不同意国防部长的决策,而这种分歧并不构成可弹劾的不当行为,但指控某官员明知故犯违反法律或滥用职权,则会引发不同的宪法问题。

与此同时,赫格塞斯坚称决议中引用的军事行动是合法的,且是总统下令开展的。

“我支持所有这些行动。我为执行它们感到自豪,明天我还会这么做,”赫格塞斯周二表示。

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/pete-hegseth-state-of-force-quantico-scaled.jpg

美国战争部长皮特·赫格塞斯于2026年9月30日在弗吉尼亚州匡蒂科的海军陆战队基地发表《军队状态》演讲。赫格塞斯向初级军官、入伍领导及特别嘉宾,包括安杜里尔工业公司联合创始人帕尔默·勒基发表了讲话。(Getty Images)

特朗普总统在新闻发布会后也为这位国防部长撑腰,称赞他的表现并抨击马斯蒂——马斯蒂今年早些时候输掉了共和党初选。

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

白宫发言人奥利维亚·威尔士告诉福克斯新闻数字版:“在短短不到两年的时间里,赫格塞斯部长与特朗普总统并肩合作,恢复了美国在世界舞台上的实力,建立了几代人以来最强大的军队,并在五角大楼树立了尚武精神。特朗普总统和赫格塞斯部长采取了大胆且必要的行动,阻止伊朗政权发展核武器,将毒贩恐怖分子尼古拉斯·马杜罗绳之以法,并保护我们的国土免受危险恐怖分子和贩毒集团的伤害——拯救了美国人民的生命。”

“这场闹剧恰恰证明了我们一直以来的看法:托马斯·马斯蒂和民主党人更热衷于玩弄政治游戏,而非致力于改善美国人民的生活,”威尔士补充道。

特朗普内阁官员纷纷支持赫格塞斯,柯林斯、伯古姆、罗林斯、马伦和特纳在社交媒体上发布了支持言论。鲁比奥和布兰奇也公开为赫格塞斯辩护。

点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用

鲁比奥称赫格塞斯“相当有效地”执行了特朗普的命令,布兰奇则驳斥了有关他有任何非法或不当行为的说法。

众议院预计将在周二晚上就推进马斯蒂弹劾决议的动议进行投票。弹劾需获得众议院简单多数票,而罢免赫格塞斯则需参议院三分之二多数票通过。

此次投票将考验议员们是将这些指控视为弹劾的理由,还是通过国会立法和监督权力解决此类争议更为恰当。

Hegseth labels impeachment push a policy dispute, but do lawmakers’ allegations rise to high crimes?

Legal experts break down whether Rep. Thomas Massie’s resolutions against War Secretary rise to impeachment level

By Morgan Phillips , Ashley J. DiMella | Fox News

Published November 10, 2026 4:44pm EST

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/morgan-headshot-2.jpg

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

blob:https://www.foxnews.com/00d06428-0da7-4a4e-85e3-a5190fbcd7e2

Listen to this article

8 min

War Secretary Pete Hegseth pushed back against an impeachment effort Tuesday, accusing lawmakers of trying to turn disagreements over President Donald Trump’s military policies into impeachable offenses.

Congress is preparing to vote on eight articles alleging the Pentagon chief violated federal law and abused his authority.

“One disgruntled congressman wants to shred it over policy disagreements. That’s what it is: policy disagreements, not high crimes, not misdemeanors, not treason, not bribery, not the kinds of offenses the founders intended when they wrote the impeachment clause,” Hegseth said at a Pentagon press conference Tuesday morning.

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

“The proper remedy for a policy disagreement, it’s legislation, it’s debate, it’s the next presidential election,” he added.

But the impeachment resolution introduced Monday by Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., goes beyond objections to the administration’s military strategy. It alleges that Hegseth violated congressional war powers, authorized unlawful military operations and retaliated against a sitting senator for exercising his constitutional rights.

HEGSETH RIPS IMPEACHMENT PUSH FROM OUTGOING REPUBLICAN AS ‘FARCE,’ ‘STUNT’

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/pete-hegseth-pointed-response.jpg

ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA – NOVEMBER 10: U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth takes questions from reporters during a news conference at the Pentagon on November 10, 2026 in Arlington, Virginia. U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-TX) introduced articles of impeachment against Hegseth on Monday, saying he violated the Constitution by waging war in Iran without congressional authorization and other charges. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The clash puts the limits of impeachment at the center of a growing fight over Trump’s national security agenda, testing whether lawmakers can make a constitutional case for removing Hegseth or are just using impeachment to challenge military and policy decisions they oppose.

Massie’s eight articles center on several of the Trump administration’s most controversial national security decisions, with three accusing Hegseth of violating the War Powers Resolution during the war against Iran.

The outgoing Kentucky Republican alleges that Hegseth initiated hostilities without congressional authorization, continued military operations after Congress directed their termination and disregarded statutory deadlines requiring the withdrawal of U.S. forces.

Other articles accuse Hegseth of failing to comply with laws intended to minimize civilian casualties, including in connection with a strike on an Iranian school, and conducting unlawful maritime strikes against suspected drug traffickers in the Caribbean.

7 REPUBLICANS REBEL AGAINST TRUMP, VOTE WITH DEMS TO REIN IN IRAN WAR POWERS

The resolution also alleges that Hegseth retaliated against Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., over a video urging service members to refuse unlawful orders, and unlawfully directed military operations in Yemen and the capture of former Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/thomas-massie-november-9-2026.jpg

Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., speaks on impeaching U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth outside the U.S. Capitol on Nov. 9, 2026 in Washington, D.C.(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Massie has rejected the suggestion that the impeachment effort is simply a referendum on Hegseth’s job performance or the administration’s military policies.

“The question is whether he committed impeachable acts,” Massie wrote on X Monday. “And the answer is yes, eight times.”

Constitutional law scholar Jonathan Turley largely agreed that the impeachment effort was on shaky ground, arguing that six of Massie’s eight articles should be dismissed outright.

“In my view, six of the eight articles should be nonstarters, including the Iranian articles,” Turley wrote on X Tuesday.

Turley acknowledged that Congress has a legitimate constitutional interest in asserting its war powers, but argued that Massie was attempting to use impeachment to settle a longstanding dispute over presidential authority. Presidents of both parties, including Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, have claimed broad authority to launch military operations without congressional approval, he noted.

“Massie is not going to ‘litigate’ the matter through impeachments,” Turley wrote, arguing that Trump was exercising authority long claimed by his predecessors.

GOP REP THOMAS MASSIE INTRODUCES 8 ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT AGAINST WAR SECRETARY PETE HEGSETH

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/defense-hegseth-senate-committee-capitol-hill-04-30-2026-fox-news.jpg

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth testifies before the Senate Armed Services Committee, on Capitol Hill, in Washington, Thursday, April 30, 2026.(Cliff Owen/AP Photo)

Vice President JD Vance, however, argued Tuesday that lawmakers were using impeachment as a substitute for exercising their legislative powers.

“Has Pete Hegseth committed impeachable crimes? The question is absurd and the answer is: obviously not,” Vance wrote on X.

“Congress has so many tools for registering its policy disagreements. Rather than use them, they’re going to try to impeach Pete Hegseth,” he continued.

Vance suggested the effort was driven less by the war with Iran than by opposition to Hegseth’s broader changes at the Pentagon, including shifting U.S. forces away from Europe and Ukraine and reorganizing the military’s senior leadership.

TRUMP’S PENTAGON SHAKE-UP REVIVES A PRESIDENTIAL POWER PLAY WITH A LONG HISTORY

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/pete-hegseth-pushes-back-impeachment-talk.jpg

ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA – NOVEMBER 10: U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon on November 10, 2026 in Arlington, Virginia. U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-TX) introduced articles of impeachment against Hegseth on Monday, saying he violated the Constitution by waging war in Iran without congressional authorization and other charges. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

“This isn’t about Iran, this is about the fact that Pete took on the bureaucracy at the Pentagon,” Vance wrote.

DRAMATIC FOOTAGE SHOWS ALLEGED NARCO BOAT ERUPT IN FIREBALL DURING US MILITARY STRIKE

Turley dismissed the article of impeachment concerning Maduro’s capture, pointing to court precedent involving the U.S. seizure of former Panamanian leader Manuel Noriega.

But Turley drew a distinction between those disputes over executive authority and two allegations he considered more serious: the maritime strikes against suspected drug traffickers and Hegseth’s treatment of Sen. Mark Kelly.

“The ‘double tap’ allegation would be a war crime, if true,” Turley wrote, noting that Trump and Hegseth have denied issuing such orders.

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/trump-hegseth-1.jpg

The effort to punish Kelly over a video urging troops to refuse unlawful orders also raised serious questions about a sitting senator’s free speech rights and potential undue command influence, Turley argued.

Still, he stopped short of concluding that either allegation met the constitutional threshold for impeachment, saying more evidence was needed.

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

DEMOCRATS RALLY BEHIND GOP LAWMAKER’S HEGSETH IMPEACHMENT PUSH, SIGNAL MORE TO COME IN JANUARY

“I will be looking for the underlying evidence on those two articles,” he wrote, describing both as potentially problematic but difficult to establish as “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

The Constitution authorizes impeachment for treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors, a standard that does not require proof of a criminal offense. Congress has historically treated serious abuses of official power as potential grounds for impeachment, though the precise boundaries remain contested.

That distinction complicates the argument that the allegations can be dismissed simply because they involve military policy. Lawmakers can disagree with a defense secretary’s decisions without those disagreements constituting impeachable misconduct, but allegations that an official knowingly violated the law or abused the powers of his office present a different constitutional question.

Hegseth, meanwhile, has maintained that the operations cited in the resolution were lawful and directed by the president.

“I stand behind every one of these operations. I was proud to execute them, and I would do it again tomorrow,” Hegseth said Tuesday.

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/pete-hegseth-state-of-force-quantico-scaled.jpg

U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth gives a State of the Force address at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Quantico, Va., on Sept. 30, 2026. Secretary Hegseth delivered his address to junior officers, enlisted leaders, and special guests including Anduril Industries co-founder Palmer Luckey.(Getty Images)

President Trump also rallied behind his defense secretary following the press conference, praising his performance and attacking Massie, who lost his Republican primary earlier this year.

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/clear.gif

“In just under two years, Secretary Hegseth has worked side-by-side with President Trump to restore American power on the world stage, build the strongest military in generations, and instill a warrior ethos at the Pentagon. President Trump and Secretary Hegseth have taken bold, necessary action to deny the Iranian regime the ability to develop a nuclear weapon, bring narco-terrorist Nicolás Maduro to American justice, and defend our homeland from dangerous terrorists and cartels – saving American lives,” White House spokesperson Olivia Wales told Fox News Digital.

“This spectacle only proves what we’ve known all along: Thomas Massie and the Democrats are far more interested in playing political games than working to improve the lives of the American people,” Wales added.

Trump Cabinet officials rallied behind Hegseth, with Collins, Burgum, Rollins, Mullin and Turner posting messages of support on social media. Rubio and Blanche also defended Hegseth publicly.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Rubio said he carried out Trump’s orders “quite effectively” and Blanche rejected claims that he had done anything illegal or wrong.

The House is expected to vote Tuesday evening on whether to advance Massie’s impeachment resolution. Impeachment would require a simple majority in the House, but removing Hegseth from office would require conviction by a two-thirds majority in the Senate.

The vote will test whether lawmakers view the allegations as grounds for impeachment or a dispute better addressed through Congress’s legislative and oversight powers.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2