特朗普250英尺拱门获由其盟友组成的规划委员会批准


2026年11月5日 美国东部时间晚上10:42 / CBS新闻

华盛顿讯——美国国家首都规划委员会周四投票批准了特朗普总统这座250英尺凯旋门的建设方案,为这座计划建于林肯纪念堂与阿灵顿国家公墓之间的纪念碑最终放行。

国家首都规划委员会作为联邦政府负责该区域规划的机构,成员多为特朗普的盟友,在听取了国会议员、退伍军人、建筑师以及华盛顿特区和弗吉尼亚州居民近9小时的公开意见后,以8票赞成、4票反对的结果批准了该项目。

目前尚不清楚这座拱门的建设何时能启动,不过美国司法部上月在一份法院文件中表示,建设最快可能在周四开工。华盛顿的一起法院诉讼可能会推迟特朗普政府的计划。

在周三晚间提交的另一份文件中,特朗普政府称,某建筑公司“可能正在——但不一定是——为筹备开工而开展场外准备工作,以期获得该地块的施工许可”。

会议召开前,国家首都规划委员会执行主任马克·保莱塔建议批准这座纪念美国独立250周年的建筑的最终选址与建设方案。

曾担任管理和预算办公室首席律师的保莱塔,称赞特朗普先生的这一建筑构想“具有历史意义”,并称它将是“人类建造过的最宏伟的拱门”。

但美国众议院自然资源委员会首席民主党众议员加利福尼亚州的贾里德·霍夫曼在听证会上表示,这座拱门是“非法的”,并会“破坏林肯纪念堂与阿灵顿国家公墓之间的庄严关联”。

“这座拱门会玷污美国、我们的理想以及我们的法律,”霍夫曼在向规划委员会发表讲话时说道,并补充称,国会才是辩论这座拟议纪念碑的合适机构。

一位反对该提案的海军陆战队退伍军人吉米·肖内西表示,“这座带着游客、餐车和巴士所营造的狂欢氛围的巨型拱门,对于那些为国家牺牲一切的人及其家属而言,令人反感且是一种侮辱”。

“本届政府非但没有关注军人家庭面临的问题,反而执意要动用纳税人的钱来选址、规划和设计一座无人要求的纪念碑,并且乐于绕过任何可能阻止他们开工的法律法规,”他说道。

根据提交给国家首都规划委员会的文件显示,这座拱门本身高166英尺,顶部设有“三座镀金雕像”——一座女性金色翼雕像,两侧各立一尊金色飞鹰雕像,整体高度达250英尺。该建筑将毗邻罗纳德·里根华盛顿国家机场,不过美国联邦航空管理局认定它“不会对航空导航构成危险”,仅要求“安全照明条件包括一个非常规的永恒火焰标志和持续照明”。

这座拱门还将配备观景台,特朗普政府预计其每日游客量将在2000至22400人之间。

预计拱门建设需耗时三年,它将坐落于波托马克河对岸、林肯纪念堂附近的“纪念圈”中心。目前尚不清楚该项目的总造价,以及谁将承担这笔费用。

特朗普先生在9月曾表示,他的“凯旋门”将是一座“顶级军事综合体”,并将用于停放无人机和存放狙击弹药。但国家首都规划委员会的文件中并未提及军事用途。

美国司法部的律师在10月的听证会上拒绝对国家安全相关细节提供更多信息。

该委员会收到了超过1300条关于该项目的公开意见,其中绝大多数反对该项目。

国家首都规划委员会批准之际,一名联邦法官正在审议是否会暂时阻止拱门的建设。一群越南战争退伍军人,以及弗吉尼亚州和华盛顿特区已提起诉讼,称特朗普政府的行动未经国会授权,且未遵守建设该纪念碑的必要程序。

在周二发布的一项命令中,美国地区法官塔尼娅·舒尔肯要求政府在国家首都规划委员会投票后一小时内通知她,并在拱门施工筹备时提前30分钟通知,以便她有时间决定是否阻止施工。

在上月的一次听证会上,舒尔肯表示,她最关心的问题是越南战争退伍军人是否有法律权利起诉。今年早些时候,最高法院发现,一起旨在阻止白宫宴会厅建设的类似诉讼的原告群体,很可能不具备对该项目提出质疑的法律资格。

在法院文件中,美国司法部称原告的动议“过于夸张”,并敦促舒尔肯遵循最高法院在白宫宴会厅案中的裁决,但原告团体的律师辩称,他们的法律论点与宴会厅案不同,并敦促舒尔肯暂停拱门的建设。

上月在一场听证会上,两名原告——越南退伍军人迈克尔·莱蒙和肖恩·伯恩斯告诉舒尔肯,拱门的建设会影响他们前往阿灵顿国家公墓扫墓的体验,并表示他们会因拱门的规模和用途受到损害。

在10月末提起的另一起诉讼中,弗吉尼亚州和华盛顿特区起诉了该项目,该案件被分配给了舒尔肯,而舒尔肯在前一天刚刚听取了越南退伍军人团体的辩论。该州的总检察长辩称,“一旦被告开工建设这个项目,他们将对我们造成不可挽回的损害”,因为“拱门项目必然会导致各司法管辖区之间的交通堵塞,造成波托马克河的污染和雨水径流,干扰应急服务,并带来众多其他挑战”。

Trump’s 250-foot arch wins approval from planning commission stacked with allies

November 5, 2026 / 10:42 PM EST / CBS News

Washington— The National Capital Planning Commission voted Thursday to approve plans for President Trump’s 250-foot triumphal arch, giving the final go-ahead for the monument that’s set to be constructed between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery.

The NCPC, which acts as the federal government’s planning agency for the region and is stacked with Trump allies, voted 8-4 to greenlight the project after almost 9 hours of public comments from members of Congress, veterans, architects and Washington, D.C., and Virginia residents.

It’s unclear how soon construction of the arch could start, though the Justice Department said in a court filing last month that it could begin as soon as Thursday. A court challenge in Washington could delay the Trump administration’s plans.

In a separate filing Wednesday night, the Trump administration said that a construction company “may be — but is not necessarily — arranging off-site preparations for construction mobilization in anticipation of permit approval” at the site.

Ahead of the meeting, the NCPC’s executive director, Mark Paoletta, recommended approval of the final site and building plans for the structure, which is supposed to celebrate 250 years of American independence.

Paoletta, the top lawyer at the Office of Management and Budget, heralded Mr. Trump’s “historic vision” for the structure and said it would be the “grandest arch ever built by mankind.”

But California Rep. Jared Huffman, the top Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee, said during the hearing that the arch is “illegal” and would “disrupt the solemn connection” between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery.

“This arch would dishonor America, our ideals, and our laws,” Huffman said during remarks to the planning commission, adding that Congress is the appropriate body for debating the proposed monument.

One Marine veteran who spoke in opposition to the proposal, Jimi Shaughnessy, said “a dominating arch with a carnival-like atmosphere of tourists, food trucks and buses is abhorrent and insulting to those who gave all and to their families.”

“Instead of focusing on the issues facing military families, this administration is intent on spending taxpayer dollars to site, plan, and design a monument no one asked for, and are content with bypassing any laws or regulations that may prevent them from breaking ground,” he said.

The arch itself will be 166 feet tall and topped with “three gilded figures” — a gold, winged female figure flanked by a gold flying eagle on each side — bringing its overall height to 250 feet, according to documents filed with the NCPC. The structure will sit close to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, though the Federal Aviation Administration determined it will pose “no hazard to air navigation,” with a “condition for safety lighting that includes a non-standard eternal flame and continuous floodlighting.”

The arch will also feature an observation deck, and the Trump administration has estimated that it could draw between 2,000 and 22,400 visitors each day.

It’s expected to take three years to build the arch, which will be located in the center of what is called Memorial Circle, across the Potomac from the Lincoln Memorial. It’s unclear how much the project will cost, and who will foot the bill.

Mr. Trump said in September that his “Triumphal Arch” would be a “top grade Military Complex” and house drones and sniper ammunition. But the documents from the NCPC do not include the military usage

Lawyers for the Justice Department declined to provide more details about the national security features in an October hearing.

The commission received more than 1,300 public comments about the project, most of which were in opposition, it said.

The NCPC’s approval comes as a federal judge is weighing whether to temporarily block construction of the arch. A group of Vietnam War veterans, as well as the Commonwealth of Virginia and the city of Washington, D.C., have filed lawsuits arguing that the Trump administration is acting without congressional authorization and is not complying with the required procedures to construct the monument.

In an order Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan required the government to provide her notice within one hour of any NCPC vote and a thirty-minute notice to any preparation for construction of the arch to give her time to issue a decision on whether to block construction.

In a hearing last month, Chutkan said the most important issue for her is whether the Vietnam War veterans had the legal right to sue. Earlier this year, the Supreme Court found that a group of plaintiffs who brought a similar suit to block the White House ballroom construction likely did not have legal standing to challenge the project.

In court filings, the Justice Department called the plaintiffs’ motions “breathless” and urged Chutkan to follow the Supreme Court’s decision in the White House ballroom case, but attorneys for the groups of plaintiffs argued that their legal arguments were different than the ballroom case and urged Chutkan to halt the arch’s construction.

Two of the plaintiffs, Vietnam veterans Michael Lemmon and Shaun Byrnes, told Chutkan in a hearing last month that the arch construction would impact their experience when visiting graves at Arlington National Cemetery, and said they would be harmed by the arch’s size and purpose.

In a separate suit brought in late October, Virginia and the District of Columbia sued, and the case was assigned to Chutkan, who had heard arguments the day before from the Vietnam veterans group. The state’s attorneys general argued that “as soon as Defendants break ground on this project, they will inflict irreparable harm” on them because “the Arch project will inevitably snarl traffic between the jurisdictions, produce pollution and stormwater runoff in the Potomac, interfere with emergency services, and pose numerous other challenges.”

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2