上诉法院就纽约市豪华第二套房税案为姆达尼赢得法律胜利


市长针对富裕房主的征税计划仍面临法律挑战

作者:布里塔妮·米勒 | 福克斯新闻

发布时间:美国东部时间2026年11月4日下午3:30

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/brittany-miller-headshot.jpg

纽约市市长佐兰·姆达尼周三赢得一场法律胜利,此前一家州级上诉法院推翻了下级法院的裁决,该裁决曾要求其政府重新推行高端第二套房税。

由四名法官组成的合议庭一致驳回了房主提起的诉讼,认定原告缺乏法律诉讼资格。该裁决推翻了9月斯塔滕岛一名法官作出的裁定,该法官曾要求纽约市重新启动该税的实施程序。

这项裁决允许姆达尼的政府继续征收附加税——也被称为“第二居所税”——这是他向富裕纽约人增税、助力填补该市预算缺口议程的关键部分。

该税目前仍面临其他独立法律挑战。

纽约市法官命令姆达尼重新推行第二套房税的实施

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/mamdani.jpg

该裁决允许纽约市市长佐兰·姆达尼的政府继续征收这项房产附加税,也就是第二居所税。(迈克尔·内格尔/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社,档案照片)

这项附加税于今年5月获得纽约州议会批准,适用于符合条件的第二套房:独栋或联排别墅价值需达到500万美元及以上,公寓或合作公寓则需达到100万美元及以上。

今年7月,纽约市财政局向约1.7万名房主发送了初步征税通知书。

斯塔滕岛一名法官于9月29日裁定,纽约市在推行该税的过程中存在不当行为,命令相关官员重新启动整个流程。该市提出上诉的同时,仍在继续推进该税的征收。

上诉法官认为,收到征税初步通知书或出现在该市房产估值清单上,并不足以构成提起诉讼的充分损害依据。法院还驳回了房主提出的相关主张,即该程序因隐私担忧或申请豁免产生的费用造成了实际损害。

法官为纽约房主就庞大清单获胜,姆达尼的豪华住房税推行目前受阻

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/nyc-walking-brownstone-buildings.png

姆达尼对该裁决表示欢迎,指控富裕房主试图逃避缴纳更多税款。(贝娅塔·扎乌热尔/努尔照片/盖蒂图片社,档案照片)

姆达尼对该裁决表示欢迎,指控富裕房主试图逃避缴纳更多税款。

“从一开始,那些最富有的人就试图利用所有可用的法律途径来保护自己的财富,避免为我们的城市贡献更多资金,”姆达尼表示。

代表这些房主的律师兰迪·马斯特罗批评法院在未审理案件实质内容的情况下就驳回了诉讼。

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/brownstone-apartments-in-manhattan.jpg

纽约曼哈顿的褐石公寓。(贝娅塔·扎乌热尔/努尔照片 via 盖蒂图片社,档案照片)

“令人遗憾的是,尽管市政府承认在推行这项附加税时存在失误,但今天法院却以‘诉讼资格’这一程序性理由绕过了案件实质内容的审理,”马斯特罗在向福克斯新闻数字频道提供的一份声明中表示,“市政府在此处的行为是不负责任的——试图将数千名无需缴纳此项附加税的人卷入其中,让他们必须证明自己确实住在自己的房子里,否则就得交税。

“但如今,这项不合法且混乱的数据收集计划将得不到纠正。”

点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

马斯特罗表示,该附加税下个月将面临另一项关于其合宪性的法律审查。姆达尼则表示,其政府将继续为这项法律辩护,应对萨福克郡的其他法律挑战。

布里塔妮·米勒是福克斯新闻数字频道突发新闻记者,曾是《独立报》记者,2023年毕业于雪城大学。

Appeals court hands Mamdani legal win on NYC luxury second-home tax

Mayor’s plan to tax wealthy property owners still faces legal challenges

By Brittany Miller | Fox News

Published November 4, 2026 3:30pm EST

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/brittany-miller-headshot.jpg

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani scored a legal victory Wednesday after a state appeals court reversed a lower court ruling that had ordered his administration to redo the rollout of a tax on high-end second homes.

The four-judge panel unanimously dismissed the homeowners’ lawsuit, finding that the plaintiffs lacked legal standing. The decision overturned a September ruling by a Staten Island judge who had ordered the city to restart the tax’s implementation.

The ruling allows Mamdani’s administration to continue implementing the surcharge — also known as a pied-à-terre tax — a key part of his agenda to raise taxes on wealthy New Yorkers and help close the city’s budget gap.

The tax still faces separate legal challenges.

NYC JUDGE ORDERS MAMDANI TO REDO SECOND-HOME TAX ROLLOUT

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/mamdani.jpg

The ruling allows NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s administration to continue implementing the property surcharge, or pied-à-terre tax.(Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images, File)

The surcharge, approved by the New York state Legislature in May, applies to qualifying second homes valued at $5 million or more for one- to three-family properties and $1 million or more for condos and co-ops.

The city’s Department of Finance sent initial determination notices to approximately 17,000 property owners in July.

A Staten Island judge ruled Sept. 29 that the city had mishandled the rollout and ordered officials to restart the process. The city appealed while continuing to implement the tax.

The appellate judges found that receiving an initial tax notice or appearing on the city’s property valuation list did not establish sufficient harm to bring the lawsuit. The court also rejected the homeowners’ arguments that the process caused concrete injuries through privacy concerns or the costs of seeking exemptions.

MAMDANI’S LUXURY-HOME TAX ROLLOUT DERAILED FOR NOW AS JUDGE DELIVERS WIN TO NYC HOMEOWNERS OVER MASSIVE LIST

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/nyc-walking-brownstone-buildings.png

Mamdani welcomed the ruling, accusing wealthy property owners of trying to avoid paying additional taxes.(Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto/Getty Images, File)

Mamdani welcomed the ruling, accusing wealthy property owners of trying to avoid paying additional taxes.

“From day one, those with the most have attempted to use every legal avenue available to shield their wealth and avoid contributing more to our city,” Mamdani said.

Randy Mastro, an attorney representing the homeowners, criticized the court for dismissing the lawsuit without addressing the merits of their challenge.

https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/brownstone-apartments-in-manhattan.jpg

Brownstone apartments in Manhattan, N.Y.(Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto via Getty Images, File)

“It’s a shame that, after the City admittedly botched the rollout of this surcharge, the court today took the procedural offramp of standing to avoid addressing the merits of this case,” Mastro said in a statement shared with Fox News Digital. “What the City has done here is unconscionable — trying to ensnare thousands of people who don’t owe this surcharge into having to prove they live in their own homes or else have to pay it.

“But now, this lawless and chaotic data collection scheme will go unremedied.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Mastro said the surcharge faces another legal test next month over its constitutionality. Mamdani said his administration would continue defending the law against separate challenges in Suffolk County.

Brittany Miller is a Fox News Digital breaking news writer and former Independent reporter who graduated from Syracuse University in 2023.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

湘ICP备2026001899号-2